ML20206L929
| ML20206L929 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1988 |
| From: | Martin R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hunger G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| References | |
| IEB-88-004, IEB-88-4, TAC-69952, TAC-69953, NUDOCS 8811300310 | |
| Download: ML20206L929 (4) | |
Text
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _.
\\
UNITED STATES
.' f NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
,s nAsmaton o.c.meses November 23, 1988 3
f Docket No. 50-277/278 i
Mr. George A. Hunger, Jr.
[
Director-Licensing Philadelphia Electric Company i
Correspondence Control Desk i
P.O. Box 7520 jl Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 l
j
Dear Mr. Hunger:
[
1 i
i
SUBJECT:
RESPONSE TO NRC RULLETIN 88-04 (TAC NOS. 69952, 69953) l
)
l RE:
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION i
On May 5, 1988, the NRC staff issued NRC Rulletin 88-04, "Potential Safety Pelated Pump loss." The bulletin requested the evaluation of all I
i safety-related pumps for 1) pump-to-pump interaction during miniflow opr;ation l
that could result in dead-heading of one or more of the pumps and 2) the i
adequacy of the minimum flow bypass lines with respect to damage resulting from operation and testing in the minimum flow mode. The bulletin also i
requested that within 60 days of receipt of the bulletin, licensees provide a c
r i
written response that (a) sufmarizes the problems and the systems affected, j
(b) identifies the short-term and long-tem modifications to plant operating
(
procedures or hardware that have been or are being implemented to ensure safe
[
i plant operations. (c) identi'ies an appropriate schedule for long-tem resolution of this and/or other significant problems that are identified as a result of this bulletin, and (d) provides justification for centinued operation particularly with regard to General Design Criterion 35 of Appendix
[
i A to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Pegulations (10 CFP, Part 50), "Emergency I
j Core Cooling" and 10 CFR 50.46, "Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core
[
t Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors." Additionally, the 1
staff reouested that within 30 days of completion of the long-term resolution.
actions, that licensees provide i written response describing the actions i
taken.
I t
i i
i 8811300310 881123
\\h PDR ADOCK 05000277 G
PNU
Mr. Hunger,
l By letter dated June 30. 1988 you responded to Bulletin 88-04 Your response adequately provided the information requested in a, b, c. and d above. The staff awaits your description of the long-term resolution actions, due within 30 days of completion of those actions.
Sincerely, 9ehf /%X,L t
f G6ert E. Martin Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
Mr. Hunger DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC POR Local PDR PDI-? Reading SYarga BBoger WButler M0'Brien RFartin RClark TAlexion MMcCoy JLinville, Region !
OGC EJordan BGrimes ACRS (10) i
\\ \\
\\
t i.
i Mr. Hunoer -
i J
By letter dated June 30, 1908 you responded to Bulletin 88-04 Your response i
adequately provided the information requested in a, b, c. and d above. The I
staff awaits your description of the long-term resolution actions, due within 30 days of cocpletion of those actions, i
Sincerely.
1
]
/5/
Robert E. Martin Project Manager l
Project Directorate 1-2 1
Division of Reactor Projects I/I!
Office of Nuclear Peactor Regulation cc: See next page r
i i
l t
I h
[ HUNGER)
PDI-?/PM Pl1-2/?
RPartin:rrr W?utler
// /2788 it/d/88