ML20206K491

Advises That 881005 Rev 8 to QA Program Description Meet Requirements of 10CFR50,App B.Confirms 881108 Telcon Re 881021 Proposal to Reduce Commitments Concerning Restructure of Engineering Assurance Function

ML20206K491
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	11/25/1988
From:	Miller H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8811290428
Download: ML20206K491 (2)

Text

,

O NOV 2 51989 Docket No. 50-346 Toledo Edison Cmpany ATTN: Mr. Donald Shelton Vice President Nuclear Edison Plaza 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, OH 43652 Gentlemen:

Thank you for the submittal of. revision 8 of your Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD), Chapter 17.2, included as part of the 10 CFR 50.71(e) update dated October 5, 1988. The changes included in the submittal were reviewed with special attention to those items discussed in our letter doted September 21, 1988. Based on this review, we find that your QAPD as revised continues to meet the requirements of 10 CFR Part 53, Appendix B.

We have also reviewed the propored reduction in your committments described in your letter dated October 21, 1988. This proposal would restructure the Engineering Assurance (EA) function at Davis-Besse by creating a new Engineering Assurance Section within the Engineering Department which would review specified engineering products. The new EA organization would report directly to the Engineering Director and would function independently of engineering line activities, but outside of the Quality Assurance organization. A telephone conference was cor.;ucted on November 8,1988, between Mr. T. Vandel of this office and Mr. Loren Ramsett and others of your staff to obtain additional details regarding your proposal. Based on our review cf you proposed changes, we conclude that the separate review activities that will be perfomed by your Engineering Assurance group and Quality Assurance group will encompass all of the activities that your are currently performing, and are therefore acceptable.

Your QAPD, when so revised, will continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR Pcrt 50 Appendix B.

If there are changes to other operative QA comitments existing in docketed correspondence outside of Chapter 17.2 of the UFSAR, you are obligated to notify this office. Implementing such changes should be based on 10 CFR 50.54(a)(3) or 10 CFR 50.55 (f)(3) as appropriate.

\

0 j$A22MBE? 8AQg6

. ..w

. Il0Vt51988 Toledo Edison Company 2 We appreciate your timely submittal of the information required by 10 CFR 50.54 (a)(3). Please contact Mr. Monte Phillips of my staff (312/790-5539) with any questions you have regarding this metter.

Sincerely Original Signed By W. D. Shafer H. J. Miller, Director Division of Reactor Safety cc: L. Storz, Plant Manager DCD/DCD (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, R!ll Harold t!. Kohn, Ohio EPA James W. Harris, State of Ohio Robe-t M. Quillin, Ohio Department of Health State of Ohio, Public

, Utilities Conmission S. H. Weiss, NRR LQAB

, 1 f

RI I R

c Yar//

fddl/mc Phi I

s Vr} P D>ayetteprigT .

1,I l er IlfLl

--