ML20206K340
| ML20206K340 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/23/1988 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206K344 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8811290373 | |
| Download: ML20206K340 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1988026
Text
$ t,0
-
.
,
.
.
c
NOV 2 31988
..
Docket No. 50-346
Toledo Edison Company
ATTN:
Mr. Donald Shelton
Vice President
Nuclear
Edison Plaza
300 Madison Avenue
Toledo, OH 43652
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. P. M. Byron,
D. C. Kosloff, T. D. Reidinger, D. L. Shepard, T. E. Vandel and L. N. Valenti,
of this office on August 16 through September 30, 1988, of activities at
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, authorized by Facility Operating License
No. NPF-3, and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. L. Storz at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection.
During the inspection, two operator license examiners conducted a two phase
inspection of the operator annual operating examination.
The primary
objective of the inspection was to ensure that the Davis-Besse operators were
capable of effectively using the station's abnormal operating procedures.
Observations by the examiners indicated that the operators were able to use
the procedures to bring the facility to a stable, safe condition.
The second
part of the inspection cortpared the content and administration of the
examination against the new NRC requalification guidelines.
The results of
this effort appear to indicate that you have made very little progress in
implementing the requalification training program for simulator scenario
development and exercise evaluation.
Because we view this apparent lack of
progress with some concern, we request that you respond to this weakness
within 30 days of the date of this letter informing us of your proposed
plans and schedule for implementing the new requalification program guidance.
GW
,
\\ \\
s811290373 831123
ppR
ADOCK 05000346
FDL
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
Toledo Edison Company
2 NOV 2 31998
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of
this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC
Public Document Room.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
CBIGI2iAI, CIGNED SY E. G. GRICCGN
Edward G. Greenman, Director
DivisionofReactorProjects
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
No. 50-346/88026(DRP)
cc w/ enclosure:
L. Storz, Plant Manager
DCD/DCB (RIOS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
James W. Harris, State of Ohio
Robert M. Quillin, Ohio
Department of Health
State of Ohio, Public
Utilities Commission
II
III
RII
RI{
RIII
RI
'
WM:
-(h/(*-
Gr% 3)
F
i
De
v tte/ jaw
h1
t
R
urd1ck
eennran
ll IT}l)
dinger /g 7 p
tb ,f$
lillk
h