ML20206G715
| ML20206G715 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 04/08/1987 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8704150117 | |
| Download: ML20206G715 (2) | |
Text
f.
.~~ ~P DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. BOX 33189 CHARLOTTE, N.O. 28242 HAL B. TUCKER Tatarssows vuos passinen, PM) Ommt NiJULEAS eBODUCTION April 8,'
1987 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555
Subject:
RII:PKV/MSL Catawba Nuclear Station Docket No. 50-414 Violation 414/87-05-03
Dear Sir:
Please find' attached our response to the subject Violation.
Very truly yours, C
\\
C <el / $
i sc:
Hal B. Tucker LTP/34/sbn Attachment xc:
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administration U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. P. K. Van Doorn NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station 8704150117 870408 q
PDR ADOCK 05000414 G
POR q
g& j O
ib
. ~c DUKE POWER COMPANY RESPONSE TO VIOLATION FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURE 414/87-05 ;
Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33, Rev. 2, February,1978.
Technical Specification 4.0.2 requires each surveillance requirement to be
-performed within the specified time interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the interval.
2 2
Technical Specification 4.0.4 prohibits entry into an operational mode.unless the surveillance requirements associated with the Limiting Condition for ' Operation have been performed within the stated surveillance interval.
Contrary to the above, on February 2, 1987, the licensee failed to perform PT/2/A/6100/02, Controlling Procedure for Unit Shutdown. This resulted-in the failure to perform various surveillance requirements within a specified time interval of at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> resulting in a violation of Technical Specification 4.0.2 and Technical Specification 4.0.4.
i i
RESPONSE
(1) Admission or Denial of Violation Duke Power Company admits the violation.
1 (2) Reason for Violation Miscommunication between Control Room Operators and a trainee, who was assigned the task of performing the surveillance procedures, resulted in missing PT/2/A/4600/2B, Mode 2 Periodic. Surveillance Items.
The Unit i
Supervisor and the Control Room Operators failed to verify the trainee had completed the proper surveillance procedures.
i
\\
(3) Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved (A) Reviewed this incident with the specific individuals involved to emphasize that required surveillances shall be performed within the specified time frame.
(B) Reviewed this incident in detail at a Shift Supervisor's Meeting conducted on March 20, 1987.
4 1
(4) Corrective Action Taken to Avoid Further Violations Actions taken in Section 3 above ensure avoidance of further violations.
1 (5) Date of Full Compliance Duke Power Company is now in full compliance.
'l
-.. -,