ML20206D287

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-277/88-32 & 50-278/88-32 on 880831-0929.No Violations Noted.Weaknesses Identified in Licensed Operator Requalification Program
ML20206D287
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/08/1988
From: Martin T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Corbin McNeil
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML20206D291 List:
References
NUDOCS 8811170036
Download: ML20206D287 (3)


See also: IR 05000277/1988032

Text

e

A-

.

he

UNITED STATES

,

a%

"t

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

3,

.. .j

REGION I

  • -

't

475 ALLENDALE ROAD

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406

November 8, 1988

Docket Nos.

50-277

50-278

Philadelphia Electric Company

ATTH: Mr. C. A. McNeill

Executive Vice President-Nuclear

Correspondence Control Desk

P. 3. Box 7520

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection Nos. 50-277/88-32 and 50-278/88-32

This letter refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Tracy Walker

of this office on August 31 - Septem' er 29, 1988, at the Peach Bottom plant

u

specific simulator, in

Columbia, Mar 31and and to the discussions of our

findings held by Tracy Walker with Dickinson Smith, Vice President-Peach Bottom

Atomic Power Station, and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection at the NRC Region I Office, King of Prussia, Pa., and to a subse-

quent telephone discussion between Robert Gallo of this office and Dickinson

Smith on October 4, 1988.

Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region I

Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter.

Within these areas, the

inspection consisted of interviews with personnel and observations by the

inspector.

Within the scope of this inspection, no violations were observed.

However, as

discussed in Paragraph 2.1, 2.2, and 3.1, several weaknesses were identified

in the licensed operator requalification program.

In addition, several dis-

crepancies in operator performance were observed as discussed in Paragraph 2.3.

The NRC concerns are listed in Appendix A to this letter.

The NRC requests a

response to these concerns within thirty (30'; days of the date of this letter

indicating the corrective actions taken.

At the exit meeting, Mr. Smith comitted to providing additional simulator

training to all of the operating crews.

The NRC has determined that additional

licensed operator proficiency and shift crew evaluations at the Peach Bottom

simulator are needed.

Arrangements for these additional evaluations are the

'

subject of separate correspondence.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

The response requested by this letter is not subject to the clearance

procedures of the Office of Management and Budget a: required by the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

p

r&

bh b 00

I(

77

1

O

PNV

---

_ _- - _ - - - .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

'

s

.

.

.

~

PhiladelpliiaElectricCompany

-2-

Your cooperation with us in this natter is appreciated.

Sincerely,

Original Signed By:

Thomas T. Martin

Thomas.T. Martin, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A

2. NRC Region I Inspection Report Nos. 50-277/88-32 and 50-278/88-32

cc w/encls:

John S. Kemper, Sr., Senior Vice President-Nuclear

J. W. Gallagher, Vice President, Nuclear Services

E. C. Kistner, Chairman, Nuclear Review Board

Dickinson M. Smith, Vice President, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

Jack Urban, General Manager, Fuels Department, Delmarva Power & Light Co.

John F. Franz, Plant Manager, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station

Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire

W. H. Hirst, Director, Joint Generation Projects Department, Atlantic Electric

Atlantic Electric

Bryan W. Gorman, Manager, External Affairs

Eugene J. Bradley, Esquire, Assistant General Counsel (Without Report)

Raymond L. Hovis, Esquire

Thomas Magette, Power F' ant Siting, Nuclear Evaluations

W. M. Alden, Director, Licensing Section

Doris Poulsen, Secretary of Harford County Council

,

Public Document Room (PDR)

Local Public Document Room (LPOR)

j

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

NRC Resident Inspector

i

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

bec w/encis:

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

Managerrent Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)

Sectioit Chief, DRP

PA0

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

R. Martin, NRR

!

B. Clayton, EDO

RI@

f

RI:DRS

!

RI DR

e

RI:

Li

lle, .

Gallo

Wal

r

y

Lange

-

11/dPf88

11/g/88

11/ /88g.

11/

88

0FFICIAL RECORD OPY

l

-- -_

-.

-

.,

-

s

.

.

.

.

.

Appendix A

NRC Concerns

Licensed Operator Requalification Program:

The lack of attention to training scenario preparation and revision as

-

discussed in Paragraph 2.1

The effect of limited time available for the crew to operate the

-

simulator during training sessions on training effectiveness as disc;ssed

in Paragraph 2.2.

The unclear definition of responsibility between the training department

-

and the Shift Manager for correction of identified performance

deficiencies as discussed in Paragraph 2.2.

Simulation performance deficiencies are being identified but are not

-

being corrected as discussed in Paragraph 3.1.

Licensed Operator Performance

Numerous deficiencies in performance of control board manipulations as

-

discussed in Paragraph 2.3.

Shift Supervisor difficulties with using multiple TRIP procedures

-

simultaneously as discussed in Paragraph 2.3.

Weaknesses in the command end control ability of one Shift Supervisor as

-

discussed in Paragraph 2.3.

The unclear definition of responsibilities and interface between the

-

Shift Managers and Shift Supervisors as discussed in Paragraph 2.3.

Weaknesses in communications between R0s and Shift Supervisors as

-

discussed in Paragraph 2.3.