ML20205S631

Requests Issuance of Encl Draft Ltr to Util Re Review of Comanche Peak Response Team Overview Quality Team Review & Audit Activities.Insp of Activities Will Be Scheduled 1 Month After Issuance of Ltr

ML20205S631
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/02/1986
From:	Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To:	Noonan V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20205F644	List: ML20205F638 ML20205F657 ML20205F725 ML20205F889 ML20205F919 ML20205Q548 ML20205S631 ML20206R633
References
FOIA-87-89 NUDOCS 8606120715
Download: ML20205S631 (2)

Text

__

/ UNITED STATES 8 o,h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 .a wasmNo ton. o. c. 20sss

%,*...+/

MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F THE CPRT OVERVIEW QUALITY TEAM (0QT)

REVIEW AND AUDIT ACTIVITIES As you are aware, members of my staff (J. Gilray and J. Spraul) along with ycur

, consultant (C. Haughney) tret May 14, 1986, with the NRC Region IV inspection staff for Comanche Peak (principal contact, C. Hale) to evaluate the implementa-tion of the OQT review and audit activities. Agreement was reached by participating parties that the procedural controls, review and audit schedules, timeliness of resolving deficiencies, and documented responsibilities for the review and audit activities of the OQT require immediate attention and correction. The charter of I the 0QT is to provide added assurance that the CPRT quality commitments are l properly and effectively implemented. We rely on this function to satisfy the 10 CFR 50 Appendix B requirement for regularly reviewing the statu. and adequscy of the program. As prsently constituted, revisions to the 00T secpe and pro-cedures are necessary for the NRC to place such reliance on the program.

Consequently, we request that you issue the attached proposed letter to W. G.

Counsil of the Texas Utilities Generating Company. <

In accordance with your request of May 6 to provide an inspecticn of the resolution of TRT ISAP's, we plan to schedule a joint Region IV, IE-HQ inspection, which will cover both the OQT implementation activities ard TRT ISAP resolution, about i

one month after issuance of the enclosed letter.

Brian A. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

As stated la+uw 1d6

l hua

/ UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,{ p, g -l WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

\...../

JUN 2 - 1986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR Licensing-A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

REVIEW OF THE CPRT OVERVIEW QUALITY TEAM (0QT)

REVIEW AND AUDIT ACTIVITIES As you are aware, members of my staff (J. Gilray and J. Spraul) along with your consultant (C. Haughney) met May 14, 1986, with the NRC Region IV inspection staff for Comanche Peak (principal contact, C. Hale) to evaluate the implementa-tion of the OQT review and audit activities. Agreement was reached by partici-pating parties that the procedural controls, review and audit schedules, timeliness of resolving deficiencies, and documented responsibilities for the review and audit activities of the 0QT require attention and correction. The charter of the 0QT is to provide added assurance that the CPRT quality commitments are properly and effectively implemented. We rely on this function to satisfy the 10 CFR 50 Appendix 8 requirement for reviewing the status and adequacy of the program. As presently constituted, revisions to the OQT scope and procedures are necessary for the NRC to place such reliance on the program. Consequently, we request that you issue the attached proposed letter to W. G. Counsil of the Texas Utilities Generating Company.

In accordance with your request of May 6 to provide an inspection of the resolu-tion of TRT ISAP's, we plan to schedule a joint Region IV, IE-HQ inspection, which will cover both the 0QT implementation activities and TRT ISAP resolution, about one month after issuance of the enclosed letter.

C Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

As stated

~

Bf7

- - - -