ML20205R197

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2 Re Vendor Interface (Programs for All safety-related Components).Response Due No Later than 850501

ML20205R197
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	03/26/1987
From:	Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Shelton D TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8704060258
Download: ML20205R197 (3)

Text

.- . . - . . _ _. _ _ __.

L Docket No. 50-346 March 26,1987 y

Mr. Donald C. Shelton '

Vice President;-Nuclear.

Toledo Edison Company l Edison. Plaza - Stop 712

300 Madison, Avenue-l Toledo, Ohio 43652

Dear Mr. Shelton:

-; c

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INF0PMATIONi ITEM 2.2 (PART ?) GENERIC LETTER 83-?8.

By letters dated July 31, 1984 (No.-1060), January 18, 1985 (No. 1114), and June 10, 1985 (No. 1158), Toledo Edison Company responded to the staff positions of Item 2.2 (Part 2), Vendor Interface'[ Programs For All Safety-Related Components) of Generic Letter 83-28. We have reviewed your-response and have identified additional information required for us to-complete our evaluation. Please provide your response to our information needs given in,the enclosure not later than May 1, '1987.

! The information contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is'not required under P.L.-96-511.

Sincerely,

/S/

John F. Stolz, Director PWR Project Directorate #6 Division of-PWR Licensino-B +

Enclosure:

Pequest for Additional l Information cc w/ enclosure:

See next page GEdison RRG-A LVws PBD-6 Files RIngram . FMiraglia "

l ADe Agazio OGC-MNBB 9604 -

L EJordan ACRS-10 JPartlow BGrimes NThompson I P80-6/J8 PBD- i-ADeA M io GEdi n J fjy /87 J /g 87- 3 /L 7 8704060250 870326 PDR ADOCK 05000346 ' '

f PDR '

r, ,

Fr. Dor.ald C. Sheltor. Cavis-Pesse Puclear rower Statf or Tolede Edison Company Unit fic. 1 CC*

4 Donald H. Hauser, Fso.

! The Cleveland Electric Padiological Health Procrar I illuminating Company Chio Departrent of Health F. 0. Box 5000 I??4 Vinnear Road Cleveland, Obic 44101 Colunbus, Ohic 43?1?

i Mr. Robert F. Peters Attorne.y Gereral Manager, Fuclear Licensing Department of Atterrey Toledo Edisor. Company General' Edison Plaza 30 East Broad Street 300 Madison Avenue Columbus, Chio 43215 Toledo, Ohio 83f:52 Mr. slames W. Harris, Director Gerald Charnoff, Esq. (Addressee Only) i Shaw, Pittman, Potts Division of Power Generation and Trowbridge Ohio Department of Industrial Pe17tions 2300 N Street N.W. 23?3 West 5th Avenue Washington, D.C. 20037 P. O. Rox 825 Columbus, Ohio 43?16 j- Mr. Paul M. Smart, President Ohio Environmental Protection Toledo Edison Company Agency 300 Madison Avenue 361 East Broad Street Toledo, Ohio 4365? Columbus, Ohio 43266-0558 Mr. Robert B. Borsum President, Board of Babcock & Wilcox County Commissioners of Nuclear Power Generation Ottawa County Division Port Clinton, Ohio 4345?

Suite 200, 7010 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 State of Ohio

! Public Utilities Commission Resident Inspector 180 Fast Broad Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Columbus, Ohio 43266-0573 5503 N. State Route ?

Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 Reofonal Administrator, Region III

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

799 Ronsevelt Poad Glen E11yr., 1111ocis 60137 l

l

? I l

_n_

RE0 VEST F0F ADDITIONAL INFORMAT!0F TTEM 2.2 (PART F) " VENDOR IhTERFACE (PROGRAPS FOR ALL SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTSi" 0 APIS BESSE NUCLEAR POWFP ETATION, UNIT I Peview of the licensee's responses dated July 31. 1084, Janua ry 18, 1985, and June 10,198f, for Item 2.T (Part 21 of Generic Letter P3-?B, discloses the r.eed for additional information 6s follows:

A. The licensee states that they actively particip6te in the Nuclear Utility Task Action Committee (NUTAC) progran. The licensee also states that pro-oram enhancements to develop and inplement the NUTAC/VETIP procrar will be made aceneding to the Interorated Living Schedule Program.

The Program enhancements have not been identified. Also, the licensee does not state that their implementation of the NUTAC/VETIP program includes NSSS vendor cont 6ct and direct contact with other vendors of safety-related eouin-ment. Further. the licensee does not show any evidence of a formal review process or overell procedure that is used to ensure that equipment technical information is complete, kept current and available. The licensee needs to address these staff concerrs.

B. The licensee describes the NUTAC/VETIP procram and states that program enhancement will be made to assure that the VETIP pronram is properly controlled and implemented. The licensee states that INPO issues Significant Event Peports. Significant Operatino Fyperience Reports and Operations and Paintenance Reminders. Upon receipt of these documents, the licensee evaluates the information to determine applicability to the  :

facility. This evaluation is documented and corrective actions are taken j as determined necessary.

The licensee does not describe how their procedures were revised to control, implement and incorporate the NUTAC/VETIP program to compen-sate for the lack of a vendor interface for safety-related equipment.

The licensee needs to address this staff concern.

C. The licensee has not committed to all of the program enhancements of the NUTAC/VETIP program. The licensee should verify that the responsibilities of the licensee or applicant and vendors that provide service on safety- i related equipment are defined such that applicable instructions for main-tenance work on safety-related equipment are provided and controlled.

d

...J