ML20205R000

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880926-29.Violation Noted: Failure to Have & Maintain Approved Procedures Utilized by Radiation Protection Ofc to Conduct Liquid Effluent & Environ Sample Radiological Analyses

ML20205R000
Person / Time
Site:	North Carolina State University
Issue date:	11/02/1988
From:	Decker T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205Q992	List: IR 05000297/1988004 ML20205Q987 ML20205R000
References
50-297-88-04, 50-297-88-4, NUDOCS 8811090421
Download: ML20205R000 (1)

Text

. .

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION North Carolina State University Docket No. 50-297 Raleigh, North Carolina License No. R-120 ,

During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on September 26-29, 1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified. in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violatira is listed below:

Technical Specification 6.3.a(8) requires operating proradures to be written, updated periodically and followed for radiation control. These Jrocedures will be maintained by operations personne'..

Contrary to the above, as of September 26, 1988, the licensee failed to have and maintain approved procedures utilized by the Radiation Protection i Office (RPO) to conduct liquid effluent and environmental sample radiological analyses.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, North Carolina State University is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Connission, ATTH: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region 11, and a c"y to the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of  :

Violation" and should include: (1) admission or denial of the violation.

(2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which ha ) been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full ccmpliance '

l will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received within the i

! time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the ,

j license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action '

i as may be proper should not be taken.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

/$'Bf$tJ )?? ' hkr14

[ W Thomas R. Decker, Acting Chief l l Emergency Preparedndss and Radiological Protection Branch Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards Dated at Atlanta, Georgia thist,ufday ofA M m/y y 1988 l

l i

i 89110?O421 881102 PDR ADOCK 05000297

.j O PDC

_ - -. _ _ _ . - , . .- . _ _ . . _ . .- .. ._ . -. _,_ . .