ML20205P216

Discusses Allegation RIII-94-A-0118 Re Falsification of Firewatch Records

ML20205P216
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	08/02/1994
From:	Funk D NRC
To:	Grant G NRC
Shared Package
ML20205P063	List: ML20205P059 ML20205P076 ML20205P164 ML20205P195 ML20205P216 ML20205P229 ML20205P305 ML20205P459 ML20205P467 ML20205P480 ML20205P493
References
FOIA-99-76 NUDOCS 9904200078
Download: ML20205P216 (4)

Text

.

August 2, 1994 1

MEMORANDUM FOR: Geoffrey Grant, Cirectar,. Division of Reactor Safety.

FROM: Donald E. Funk Jr., Office Allegation Coordinator

SUBJECT:

ALLEGATION RE: FALSIFICATION OF FIREWATCH RECORDS AT D.C. COOK (AMS NO. RIII-94-A-0118)

On July 18, 1994, this matter was discussed with E. T. Pawlik of the Office of .

Investigations Region III Field Office, and it was concluded that investigative effort by 01:RIII may be warranted for the reason'given below.

Should additional facts or information relating to possible wrongdoing concerning this allegation become available, please notify me promptly.

This allegation will continue to be carried as "open" in the Allegation Management System pending final resolution / closeout by your Division.

Original signed by Donald Fur.k Donald E. Funk Jr.

Office Allegation Coordinator Attachments:

I. AMS Form

2. 7/6/94 J. Belanger memo f

cc w/ attachments:

RAO:RIII DRP:RIII RC:RIII 01:RIII G. C. Wright W. D. Shafer J. R. Creed BASIS: Since willful wrongdoing was alleged, falsification of firewatch records, DRS should convene an Allegation Review Board, with OI and RC present.

1 r <

" 7 (,

9904200078 990414' /

PDR FOIA <

/

OUNTER99-76 PDR 67904 7poo78 b

~

uu.unnu u4ita cuiu neu m f' LTR BPS No. 33: - ALLEGATION ACTION PLAN '(2 Pages)

ALLEGATION ACTION PLAN ALLEGATION NO. RIII- 9/ -A- O f f 8 '

Licensee: D. C, Con K Oocket/ License No: .50 -3) .6 60-31(o Assigned Olvision: DR$ /pj,, , ,c,. , ,,, ps,.,.,//

g g ,j gy, ,

Attached Pertinent Documents //em o fr ,,, An hnd /eled 94, I. Division Action A. Prepared by: - / IM Technical ta f / Dat'e B. Reviewed by: h) N /[ b C. Approved by:

Oa e '

~

. Branch Chief #

II. Allegation Review Board Action "

Alleg ion Review o rd Members 'p i fag

, 4.9 .1 h

• b M  !

I

/ / Approved A 4

is

\cd N bO c, (

/ / Approved with Modifications as Documented in Plan.

9Q%keM f

/ / Disapproved for Following Reasons: "

/ 01 Referral s:s )Jsosas &

A..U..a49...,esA

- . 1.. ....

.i-h*,,,

Ltr bps h h W 3$* %' Revised 10/01/91

/ I f

a cAnk.%% M(er '

's ALLEGATION / PERIPHERAL ISSUE ACTION PLAfi Concerns and any peripheral issues associated with a concern should be documented on a separate page. Each concern and peripheral issue, if any, should'be documented in the follovup report as is stated in this plan. If '

there are several concerns in one area, one page can be used. Otherwise,-a-separate page should be used for each concern.

/ / Concern No. / / Peripheral Issues Associated with' Concern No.

I. Action Evaluation: The following method of resolution is recommended (circle):

A. Send to Licensee Requestir.g Response in Days with RIII followup

• B. Priority R111 Followup C. Followup During Routine Inspection Withir 0 Days D. Followup with Assistance from 01 E. Ito Action - Outside NRC's Charter (describe basis below)

F. llo Action - Without Merit (describe basis below)

G. Refer to H. Other (specify)

If the proposal is to send to the licensee, the Action Plan should describe the general areas we expect the licensee to address.

!!. Inspector's Actions: The following areas at a rainimum will be reviewed during the inspection into the above mentioned concern and/or peripheral issue.

A. Objective B. Methods

, 1. Perscris to be contacted: 1 j

2. Documents and/or activities to be reviewe'd:

3. Time period to be covered:

4. Locations / specific areas to visit:

5. Other areas (specify):

Allegation No. RIII ft-A- 0///

U , ,

.,. qc q.

9

'b,,

ALIJtGATION ACTION PLAN Allegation Number RIII-94-A-0118 This allegation involves the falsification of fire watch records. The problem was identified by licensee personnel and significant action, as documented.in attachment 1, has been taken. This attachment also indicates that some~ follow up was provided by a Region III inspector in June ~of this year (Inspection Report 315/316/94012(DRS)).

The problem appears to involve one individual, who no longer works at DC Cook.

Little could be gained by additional inspection. We therefore recommend'that.

no additional inspection be performed and that'the allegation be closed by.a'.

memorandum to file.

I 4

2

-] 4

_'l

. .