ML20205M952

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Listed Sser 4 Inputs for Transmittal to Board.Memo from Eisenhut to Sheppard Re Review of Westinghouse Response Guidelines & Inputs on Crdr & SPDS Also Encl
ML20205M952
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/1986
From: Novak T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Christenbury E
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML20205M956 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0588, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-0896, RTR-NUREG-588, RTR-NUREG-737, RTR-NUREG-896, TASK-1.D.1, TASK-1.D.2, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8605010154
Download: ML20205M952 (2)


Text

s

/

.),

APR 2 5 G6 A

MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward S. Christenbury Director & Chief Counsel Pearing Divison, OEl.D FROM:

Thomas M. Novak, Acting Director Division of PWR licensing-A

SUBJECT:

ASI.B MATTERS PERTAINING TO SEABROOK UNIT 1 Attached for your transmittal to the Board are the following SSER-4 inputs:

1.

Emergency planning providing the staff's review and evaluation of emergency action levels, and 2.

Equipment qualification providing the staff's review and evaluation of j

post-accident time.

Per E. Reis' request, I have enclosed a memo from Eisenhut to Sheppard pertaining to the staff's review of the Westinghouse's emergency response guidelines.

I understand Reis intends to provide this memo to the Board as an indication of the status of this issue.

Also attached are draft SSER-4 inputs on I.D.1 (Control Room Design Review) and I.D.2 (Plant Safety Parameter Display System).

Reis plans to discuss these items with the State of hew Hampshire, which has a contention (NH-10) regarding these items, to determine whether the State of New Hampshire j

considers the information, when formally issued in SSER-4, would be sufficient to have them withdraw their contention.

Since the technical staff and I (by this memo) have concurrred with the SSER-4 inputs, these inputs will be published without further changes.

h Thomas M. Novak, Acting Director Distrib:

Division of PWR licensing-A wDocketiFiles _

Enclosures:

NRC PDR V. Nerses As stated

{

Local PDR M. Rushbrook i\\ g PD#5 R/F l

OFC

PAD 5
PAD 5 1
PADO

_3 _____:_..._______7___

NAME Spst

VSNo na
TM DATE :4/

86

4

/86

4/

86 0FFICIAI. RECORD COPY 8605010154 e60425 PDR ADOCK 05000443 E

PDR

h/

/*

UNITED STATES

,(

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L

\\*****/

APR 2 51986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward S. Christenbury Director & Chief Counsel Hearing Divison, OELD FROM:

Thomas M. Novak, Acting Director Division of PWR licensing-A

SUBJECT:

ASI.B MATTERS PERTAINING TO SEABROOK UNIT 1 Attached for your transmittal to the Board are the following SSER-4 inputs:

1.

Emergency planning providing the staff's review and evaluation of emergency action levels, and

.2.

Equipment qualification providing the staff's review and evaluation of post-accident time.

Per E. Reis' request, I have enclosed a memo from Eisenhut to Sheppard pertaining to the staff's review of the Westinghouse's emergency response guidelines.

I understand Reis intends to provide this memo to the Board as an indication of the status of this issue.

Also attached are draft SSER-4 inputs on I.D.1 (Control Room Design Review) and I.D.2 (Plant Safety Parameter Display System). Reis plans to discuss these items with the State of New Hampshire, which has a contention (NH-10) regarding these items, to determine whether the State of New Hampshire considers the information, when formally issued in SSER-4, would be sufficient to have them withdraw their contention.

Since the technical staff and I (by this memo) have concurred with the SSER-4 inputs, these inputs will be published withhout further changes.

Thomas M. Novak, Acting Director Division of PWR I.icensing-A

Enclosures:

As stated

"