ML20205K026
| ML20205K026 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1988 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Firlit J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205K030 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8810310536 | |
| Download: ML20205K026 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000312/1988030
Text
-
. _ .
. - - _
_ _ _
_ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
-
'
l
f.
.
. . .
d
.
.
.
!
OCT 1s mg
,
c
r
,
Docket No. 50-312
r
!
-Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
14440 Twin Cities Road
Herald, California 95638-9799
7
!
Attention:
Mr. J. F. Fir 11t
!
Chief Executive Officer. Nuclear
5
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION
[
This letter refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. C. A. Hooker of
this office on September 12-16, 1988, of activities authorized by NRC License
l
No. DPR-54 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Hooker with Mr.
,
J. F. Firlit and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the
inspection.
!
!
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
!
.
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
l
j
examinations of procedures and representative records, intervietis with
'!
personnel, and observations by the inspector.
j
,
.
)
We note that your level of performance with respect to liquid effluents
f
continuet to warrant a high level of management attention. We racognize and
t
appreciate your internal assessments identifying continuing problems in this
f
area; however, the timeliness of your response needs to be improved,
f
.
Specifically, it is difficult to understand why the Chemistry Department had
not received your Audit Report No. 88-A-104, conducted June 1988, as of
[
!
September 15, 1988.
It is our intention to follow your activities in this
i
i
area closely with particular attention to possible changes in effluent quality
I
as plant operation continues.
j
i
,
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified as a result of
i
this inspection.
{
'
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of the letter and the enclosure
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
[
I
.
!
l
{
t
n
>
- )r -
!
]
L
j
'
c
i
(
8810310536 881013 ,
.y
qg
[
l-
{DR
ADOCK 0500 g
j-
1
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ .
_ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
_ - _ _
_-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
.
.
'
..
.
,
6
.
.
~2~
DCT 131993
'
!
,
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
[
Sincerely,
D'I'rnSi}ec
L
Ross A. yearano,Dir
<
Divisio of Radiation Safety
!
and Safeguards
l
t
-
Enclosure
Inspection Report No. 50-312/88-30
(
i
cc w/ enclosure:
!
J. Vinquist, Quality Asturance Manager
l
Steve L. Crunk, Manager, Nuclear Licensing
State of California
!
bec w/ copy of enclosure:
Docket File
'
Project Inspector
Resident Inspector
i
G. Cook
i
4
!
8. Faulkenberry
!
!
J. Martin
J
!
T. Foley, NRR
!
'
bec w/o copy of enclosure:
(
4
M. Smith
!
'
LIM 8
.
b
!
REGIONvg
NO V&
i
,
'
!
CHooker/Joan
HNorth
GPYuh s
RAScara
'
10//)/88
10/p /88
104,1/88
10//3/88
l
1
REQUEST COPY ]
EST COPY ]
ST COPY ] RE
ST COPY )
f3) / NO
YES / NO
li YES / NO
]
/ NO
]
V
V
"
TO POR ]
.
p
ES / NO
]
-
!
i
(
l
.
,
i
(
l
1
1
r
r
i
-- -
-
- -
- - -
- -
- - -
-- J