ML20205K026

Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/88-30 on 880912-16.No Noncompliance Noted.Level of Performance Re Liquid Effluents Continues to Warrant High Level of Mgt Attention

ML20205K026
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	10/13/1988
From:	Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:	Firlit J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20205K030	List: IR 05000312/1988030 ML20205K026
References
NUDOCS 8810310536
Download: ML20205K026 (2)

See also: IR 05000312/1988030

Text

- . _ . . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

'

. . . f. . l

d .

. .

!

,

OCT 1s mg

c

r

,

Docket No. 50-312 r

!

-Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station  ;

Sacramento Municipal Utility District  :

14440 Twin Cities Road

Herald, California 95638-9799 7

!

Attention: Mr. J. F. Fir 11t  !

Chief Executive Officer. Nuclear 5

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION [

This letter refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. C. A. Hooker of

this office on September 12-16, 1988, of activities authorized by NRC License l

No. DPR-54 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Hooker with Mr. ,

J. F. Firlit and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the  ;

inspection.  !

!

. Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection  !

report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective l

j examinations of procedures and representative records, intervietis with '!

, personnel, and observations by the inspector. j

.

) We note that your level of performance with respect to liquid effluents f

continuet to warrant a high level of management attention. We racognize and t

appreciate your internal assessments identifying continuing problems in this f

. area; however, the timeliness of your response needs to be improved, f

Specifically, it is difficult to understand why the Chemistry Department had

not received your Audit Report No. 88-A-104, conducted June 1988, as of [

! September 15, 1988. It is our intention to follow your activities in this i

i area closely with particular attention to possible changes in effluent quality I

as plant operation continues. j

i

, No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified as a result of i

'

this inspection. {

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of the letter and the enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. [

. I

! l

{

t

n >

j

' - ])r -  !

L

i

( c

l- 8810310536 881013 , .y qg [

ADOCK 0500 g j-

{DR

1

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

. .

.

'

.. ,

6

. .

'

~2~

DCT 131993

!

,

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to

discuss them with you. [

Sincerely,

L

<

D'I'rnSi}ec

Ross A. yearano,Dir  :

!

Divisio of Radiation Safety  !

and Safeguards l

-

t

Enclosure

Inspection Report No. 50-312/88-30 (

i cc w/ enclosure:  !

J. Vinquist, Quality Asturance Manager l

Steve L. Crunk, Manager, Nuclear Licensing

State of California

! bec w/ copy of enclosure:  ;

Docket File '

Project Inspector

Resident Inspector i

4 G. Cook i

! 8. Faulkenberry  !

! J. Martin J

! T. Foley, NRR  ;

'

!

bec w/o copy of enclosure: (

4 M. Smith  !

'

. LIM 8

b  !

,

!'

REGIONvg

CHooker/Joan HNorth

NO V& GPYuh s RAScara

i

'

10//)/88 10/p /88 104,1/88 10//3/88  ;

l

1

REQUEST COPY ] EST COPY ] ST COPY ] RE ST COPY )

f3) / NO YES / NO li YES / NO ]

"

/ NO ]

V V

.

p ES / NO

TO POR ]

]

-  !

i (

l

.

,

(

i

l

1

1 r

r

i

_ --_-_ _ __ __- _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ ________ _ -- J