|
|---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20211H0381999-08-23023 August 1999
Discusses Tank Waste Remediation Sys Project Established by Us DOE in 1991 to Manage,Retrieve,Treat,Immobilize & Dispose of Approx 204 Million Liters of Radwaste Stored in 177 Underground Tanks Located at Hanford Site,Richland,Wa
ML20195C1021999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards Point Paper Entitled, Process Safety of Proposed Tank Waste Remediation Sys (Twrs), Analyzing Generic TWRS-P Facility as Well as Conceptual Design Approaches Proposed by DOE Contractors
ML20205G5901999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards Proprietary Comments on Guidance Review Document for Construction Authorization Request (Car), RL/REG-99-05, Draft Rev 0,Mar 1999.Proprietary Encl Withheld
ML20206S0261999-01-22022 January 1999
Provides NRC Technical Staff Comments on Bnfl,Inc Criticality Safety Program.Nrc Position Is That Several of Provisions Do Not Adequately or Fully Resolve Issues Raised
ML20236T3611998-07-23023 July 1998
Forwards Tank Waste Remediation Systems Section'S Comments on Bnfl Revised Safety Requirements Document & Integrated Safety Mgt Plan.Comments Range from Difference in Regulatory Requirements to Editorial in Nature
ML20203E0211998-02-13013 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial Safety Assessment Package,Dtd 980124.Encl Withheld
ML20203C3461998-02-0606 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial SAR A-4,dtd 980112,that Was Submitted by Bnfl,Inc & Separate two-volume Technical Rept A-2,dtd 980123.Encl Withheld
ML20212E8321997-10-20020 October 1997
Provides Status of Fee Collection Activities for Fy 1997 & Lists Amount Appropriated to NRC for Fy 1997.Amount Derived from Nuclear Waste Fund & Amount Appropriated for Regulatory Reviews & Other Activities Re Waste Stored at Hanford
ML20148K7641997-06-0909 June 1997
Ack Receipt of Requesting NRC Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Removal from Tanks & Disposal on-site Is Incidental Waste & Not Be Subject to NRC Licensing Authority.W/Diskette
ML20135D8621997-02-27027 February 1997
Submits Comments on Document, Guidance for Review of Twrs Privitization Contractor Employee Concerns Mgt Sys, Dtd Oct 1996
ML20135A7821997-02-18018 February 1997
Submits Response to 970206 RAI Re Hanford Incidental Waste Classification
ML20134J4531997-02-0606 February 1997
Informs That NMSS Would Like to Resolve Noted Issues in Mtg W/D Wodrich & PA Staff That Authored Interim PA Document,In Order to Facilitate Expedited Review Schedule Requested in
ML20134M6781996-11-0707 November 1996
Requests Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Disposal on-site Incidental Waste,Would Not Subj to NRC Licensing Authority
ML20134G0761996-10-29029 October 1996
Forwards Guidance to Staff Which Was Prepared to Assist in Review of Initial Quality Assurance & Employee Concerns Programs,For Info
1999-08-23
[Table view]
Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20211H0381999-08-23023 August 1999
Discusses Tank Waste Remediation Sys Project Established by Us DOE in 1991 to Manage,Retrieve,Treat,Immobilize & Dispose of Approx 204 Million Liters of Radwaste Stored in 177 Underground Tanks Located at Hanford Site,Richland,Wa
ML20195C1021999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards Point Paper Entitled, Process Safety of Proposed Tank Waste Remediation Sys (Twrs), Analyzing Generic TWRS-P Facility as Well as Conceptual Design Approaches Proposed by DOE Contractors
ML20205G5901999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards Proprietary Comments on Guidance Review Document for Construction Authorization Request (Car), RL/REG-99-05, Draft Rev 0,Mar 1999.Proprietary Encl Withheld
ML20206S0261999-01-22022 January 1999
Provides NRC Technical Staff Comments on Bnfl,Inc Criticality Safety Program.Nrc Position Is That Several of Provisions Do Not Adequately or Fully Resolve Issues Raised
ML20236T3611998-07-23023 July 1998
Forwards Tank Waste Remediation Systems Section'S Comments on Bnfl Revised Safety Requirements Document & Integrated Safety Mgt Plan.Comments Range from Difference in Regulatory Requirements to Editorial in Nature
ML20203E0211998-02-13013 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial Safety Assessment Package,Dtd 980124.Encl Withheld
ML20203C3461998-02-0606 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial SAR A-4,dtd 980112,that Was Submitted by Bnfl,Inc & Separate two-volume Technical Rept A-2,dtd 980123.Encl Withheld
ML20212E8321997-10-20020 October 1997
Provides Status of Fee Collection Activities for Fy 1997 & Lists Amount Appropriated to NRC for Fy 1997.Amount Derived from Nuclear Waste Fund & Amount Appropriated for Regulatory Reviews & Other Activities Re Waste Stored at Hanford
ML20148K7641997-06-0909 June 1997
Ack Receipt of Requesting NRC Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Removal from Tanks & Disposal on-site Is Incidental Waste & Not Be Subject to NRC Licensing Authority.W/Diskette
ML20135D8621997-02-27027 February 1997
Submits Comments on Document, Guidance for Review of Twrs Privitization Contractor Employee Concerns Mgt Sys, Dtd Oct 1996
ML20134J4531997-02-0606 February 1997
Informs That NMSS Would Like to Resolve Noted Issues in Mtg W/D Wodrich & PA Staff That Authored Interim PA Document,In Order to Facilitate Expedited Review Schedule Requested in
1999-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
_
April 1, 1999 9
./
Dr. D. Clark Gibbs, Regulatory Official Office of Radiological, Nuclear and Process Safety Regulation U.S. Department of Energy Richland Operations Office, Mail Stop A4-70 i P.O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS ON
- GUIDANCE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION REQUEST (CAR)," RUREG-99-05, DRAFT REV. O, MARCH 1999
Dear Dr. Gibbs:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the draft document that is intended for use by your staff in the review of the BNFL Inc. construction authorization request (CAR). As you have indicated, this guidance was developed utilizing the general format of NRC's draft Standard Review Plan (SRP) for licensing of facilities under 10 CFR Part 70, where you deemed this was appropriate for the TWRS-P facility. The review that the staff conducted showed a close correspondence between the RU's draft review guidance document and the June 1998 draf t of the SRP, even though the two guidance documents are intended for different purposes; viz; review of a construction authorization request versus review of a license application. As you are aware, a draft TWRS-P version of the SRP has just recently been released by the NRC as NUREG-1702, dated March 1999. This most recent NRC draft document reflects some recent thinking relative to the application of 10 CFR Part 70 to the TWRS-P project, and thus differs somewhat from the June 1998 draft.
The comments that the NRC staff has developed on your preliminary draft guidance review document are provided in the enclosure. In general, our quick review indicates that the RU's guidance appears to be well written, in that while it is quite comprehensive, it is also relatively clear and concise. In certain areas the guidance appears to be even more direct, explicit, and detailed than the current draft NRC SRP. We very much appreciated the opportunity to review j the preliminary draft guidance document and look forward to seeing the final draft, which is j expected to address the review of the Preliminary Safety Analysis. I If there are any questions regarding these comments, please contact Michael Tokar at (301) 415-7251, or me at (301) 415-7192. f]
Sincerely, > l YS l .h? { Robert C. Pierson, Chief b) g(g Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety 9904070302 990401 PDR ADOCK 07003091 and Safeguards, NMSS C ppg
Enclosure:
As stated \~ !
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket 70-3091 ftlRO PB6CerEr5 NMSS r4 FCss rn SPB rn TWRS staff OFC SPB' sP k , SPB k SPS f ) sPB NAME RShowrnakerij k ey / R rson DATE b d/99 Y ///99 9 / l/99 / /99 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY gtarguttr.wpd OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ,
L