|
|---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20211H0381999-08-23023 August 1999
Discusses Tank Waste Remediation Sys Project Established by Us DOE in 1991 to Manage,Retrieve,Treat,Immobilize & Dispose of Approx 204 Million Liters of Radwaste Stored in 177 Underground Tanks Located at Hanford Site,Richland,Wa
ML20195C1021999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards Point Paper Entitled, Process Safety of Proposed Tank Waste Remediation Sys (Twrs), Analyzing Generic TWRS-P Facility as Well as Conceptual Design Approaches Proposed by DOE Contractors
ML20205G5901999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards Proprietary Comments on Guidance Review Document for Construction Authorization Request (Car), RL/REG-99-05, Draft Rev 0,Mar 1999.Proprietary Encl Withheld
ML20206S0261999-01-22022 January 1999
Provides NRC Technical Staff Comments on Bnfl,Inc Criticality Safety Program.Nrc Position Is That Several of Provisions Do Not Adequately or Fully Resolve Issues Raised
ML20236T3611998-07-23023 July 1998
Forwards Tank Waste Remediation Systems Section'S Comments on Bnfl Revised Safety Requirements Document & Integrated Safety Mgt Plan.Comments Range from Difference in Regulatory Requirements to Editorial in Nature
ML20203E0211998-02-13013 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial Safety Assessment Package,Dtd 980124.Encl Withheld
ML20203C3461998-02-0606 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial SAR A-4,dtd 980112,that Was Submitted by Bnfl,Inc & Separate two-volume Technical Rept A-2,dtd 980123.Encl Withheld
ML20212E8321997-10-20020 October 1997
Provides Status of Fee Collection Activities for Fy 1997 & Lists Amount Appropriated to NRC for Fy 1997.Amount Derived from Nuclear Waste Fund & Amount Appropriated for Regulatory Reviews & Other Activities Re Waste Stored at Hanford
ML20148K7641997-06-0909 June 1997
Ack Receipt of Requesting NRC Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Removal from Tanks & Disposal on-site Is Incidental Waste & Not Be Subject to NRC Licensing Authority.W/Diskette
ML20135D8621997-02-27027 February 1997
Submits Comments on Document, Guidance for Review of Twrs Privitization Contractor Employee Concerns Mgt Sys, Dtd Oct 1996
ML20135A7821997-02-18018 February 1997
Submits Response to 970206 RAI Re Hanford Incidental Waste Classification
ML20134J4531997-02-0606 February 1997
Informs That NMSS Would Like to Resolve Noted Issues in Mtg W/D Wodrich & PA Staff That Authored Interim PA Document,In Order to Facilitate Expedited Review Schedule Requested in
ML20134M6781996-11-0707 November 1996
Requests Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Disposal on-site Incidental Waste,Would Not Subj to NRC Licensing Authority
ML20134G0761996-10-29029 October 1996
Forwards Guidance to Staff Which Was Prepared to Assist in Review of Initial Quality Assurance & Employee Concerns Programs,For Info
1999-08-23
[Table view]
Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20211H0381999-08-23023 August 1999
Discusses Tank Waste Remediation Sys Project Established by Us DOE in 1991 to Manage,Retrieve,Treat,Immobilize & Dispose of Approx 204 Million Liters of Radwaste Stored in 177 Underground Tanks Located at Hanford Site,Richland,Wa
ML20195C1021999-05-28028 May 1999
Forwards Point Paper Entitled, Process Safety of Proposed Tank Waste Remediation Sys (Twrs), Analyzing Generic TWRS-P Facility as Well as Conceptual Design Approaches Proposed by DOE Contractors
ML20205G5901999-04-0101 April 1999
Forwards Proprietary Comments on Guidance Review Document for Construction Authorization Request (Car), RL/REG-99-05, Draft Rev 0,Mar 1999.Proprietary Encl Withheld
ML20206S0261999-01-22022 January 1999
Provides NRC Technical Staff Comments on Bnfl,Inc Criticality Safety Program.Nrc Position Is That Several of Provisions Do Not Adequately or Fully Resolve Issues Raised
ML20236T3611998-07-23023 July 1998
Forwards Tank Waste Remediation Systems Section'S Comments on Bnfl Revised Safety Requirements Document & Integrated Safety Mgt Plan.Comments Range from Difference in Regulatory Requirements to Editorial in Nature
ML20203E0211998-02-13013 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial Safety Assessment Package,Dtd 980124.Encl Withheld
ML20203C3461998-02-0606 February 1998
Forwards Proprietary Initial Comments from Review of Initial SAR A-4,dtd 980112,that Was Submitted by Bnfl,Inc & Separate two-volume Technical Rept A-2,dtd 980123.Encl Withheld
ML20212E8321997-10-20020 October 1997
Provides Status of Fee Collection Activities for Fy 1997 & Lists Amount Appropriated to NRC for Fy 1997.Amount Derived from Nuclear Waste Fund & Amount Appropriated for Regulatory Reviews & Other Activities Re Waste Stored at Hanford
ML20148K7641997-06-0909 June 1997
Ack Receipt of Requesting NRC Agreement That Hanford Tank Waste Planned for Removal from Tanks & Disposal on-site Is Incidental Waste & Not Be Subject to NRC Licensing Authority.W/Diskette
ML20135D8621997-02-27027 February 1997
Submits Comments on Document, Guidance for Review of Twrs Privitization Contractor Employee Concerns Mgt Sys, Dtd Oct 1996
ML20134J4531997-02-0606 February 1997
Informs That NMSS Would Like to Resolve Noted Issues in Mtg W/D Wodrich & PA Staff That Authored Interim PA Document,In Order to Facilitate Expedited Review Schedule Requested in
1999-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
s
\ .
? ,; .
Dr. Clark Gibbs, Regulatory Official Regulatory Unit Richland Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 550 Richland, WA 99353
Dear Dr. Gibbs:
SUBJECT:
NRC COMMENTS ON LMAES INITIAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT PACKAGE in accordance with our agreement in the January 29,1997, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 4 Commission, I am providing initial comments from our review of the Initial Safety Assessment Package (ISAP), dated January 24,1998, that was submitted to you by Lockheed Martin Advanced Environmental Systems, Inc. (LMAES). The NRC staff's initial comments resulting from the review of the ISAP are found in the enclosure. Due to the expedited schedule of the LMAES ISAP review, the NRC staff may retum and continue their review of the LMAES ISAP at a later date as time permits, and thus may provide additional comments in the future.
In accordance with the MOU, we have focused our comments on those items which may impact the health or safety of the public, workers, or the environment, consistent with normal NRC practice, or which we have assessed cou:d lead to an inconsistency with the NRC's regulatory approach. The NRC did not review areas of the ISAP related to contractual consistency between DOE and LMAES, which are considered outside the purview of NRC's role as defined by the MOU.
If you have any questions, please call me at (301) 415-7192.
Sincerely, Osth1Gl SiQnUd OY Robert C. Pierson, Chief Special Projects Branch Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards, NMSS l
Enclosure:
i \
LMAES ISAP comments Docket 70-3091 ,
DISTRIBUTION:
Docket 70-3091 *MElIENHEFD SPB r/f OFC SPI), d ._ hB h SPB [ SPB SPB NAME GCNrbrt:ij t diey M6 hierson l DATE a f]/98 k k98 2. /J/98 th/98 / /98 C = COVER E = COVER & ENCLOSURE N = NO COPY g:\lmsevr.gcc OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9802260234 "80213 72 I"" [~(*
PDR ADOCK 07003091-
" "" l ll.....
ll llllll li.lllil.l
.- - - - - - - -