ML20205F392

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses FEMA Findings on Util Transition Plan for Facility.Fema Finds That Six Inadequate Elements Still Remain in Rev 5 & Notes That Five Elements Identified as Inadequate in Regional Assistance Committee Review of Rev 4
ML20205F392
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1985
From: Butler W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Leonard J
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8511050344
Download: ML20205F392 (5)


Text

.

Docket No.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard Vice President - Nuclear Operations Long Island Lighting Co.

Shoreham Nuclear Power Station P.O. Box 618, North Coontry Road Wading River, NY 11792

Dear Mr. Leonard:

SUBJECT:

FEftA FINDINGS ON LILC0 TRANSITI0ft PLAN FOR SHOREHAM u

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has reviewed your letter of August 2,1985(SNR(-1198), which transmitted your response to the FEMA findings developed as a result of the review by the Regional Assistance Comittee s

(RAC) of Revision 4 to the LILC0 offsite Transition Plan for Shoreham. Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum datec October 8,1985, for William J. Dircks of the hRC frcm Samuel W. Speck of FEMA which transmits the results of the RAC review of Revision 5 to the plan.You will also find enclosed a copy of a mcmorandum dated October 24, 1985 from Richard W. Krin.m of FEMA to Edward L.

Jordan of the NRC which contains a correction to page 49 of tne evaluation.

FEMA finds that six inadequate clcnents still remain in Revision 5 and notes that five of these were identified as inadequate in t.ie RAC review of Revision 4.

FEMA indicates that there is a legal authority concern associated with four of the inadequacies and that in some of the inadequacies the legal issues are the najor concerns.

t Walter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated g

cc: Sec next page

, DISTRIBUTION EDocketJtlej LB#2 Reading JParticw BGrimes NRC PDR EHylton s

Local PDR RCaruso E Jordan PRC Systen BBordenick DMatthews NSIC ACR$(16)

LBA LB#2/DL RCar a:dh WRbutler 4

10/

85 10 (/65 h

0511050344 951030 PDR ADOCK 05000322 F

PM

Docket fle.: 50-322 Mr. John D. Leonard Vice President - Nuclear Operations Long Island Lighting Co.

Shoreham Nuclear Fower Station P.O. Box 618, horth Country Road Wading River, NY 11792

Dear Mr. Leonard:

SUBJECT:

FEf;A FIf; DINGS ON LILC0 TRANSITION PLAN FOR SHOREHAh The Feceral Eiaergency Management Agency (FEFA) has reviewed your letter of August 2, 1985(SNRC-1198), which transmitted your response to the FEMA findings developed as a result of the review by the Regional Assistarcc Cornittee (RAC) of F,evision 4 to the LILC0 offsite Transitior. Plan for Shoreham.

Enclosed is a copy of a merr.orandum datec 0ctct4r 8,1985, for William J. Dircks cf thc NRC frcrr. Samuel W. Speck of FEMA which transitits the results of the RAC review of Revision 5 to the plan.Ycu will also find enclosed a ccpy cf a raemorardum dated October 24, 1985 frcu Richarc W. Krirr,m of FEMA to Edward L.

Jordan of the NRC which contains a correction to page 49 of the evaluaticr..

FEMA finds that six inadequate citr.ents still remain in Revision 5 and notes that five of thcsc ucre identified as inadequate in the RAC review of Revision 4.

FEMA indicates that there is a legal authority concern associated with four of the inadequacies erd that in sotie of the inadequacies the icgal issues are the najor concerns.

Walter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated cc: Sec reyt page DISTRIBUTION Docket File LBt2 Reading JPartlow NRC PDR EHylton BGrirres Local PDR RCaruso EJordan PRC Syster EBtrdenick DMatthews NSIC ACRS(16)

LBe LB#2/DL RCa 0:dh WRButler LV 10 PE 10/pf;5

o ur

/

'o UNITED STATES E"

~,,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

5 E

WASHINGTON,0. C. 20555

%*****/

OCT 30 9%

Docket fle.: 50-3'n Mr. John D. Leonaro Vice President - Nuclear Operations Long Islano Lighting Co.

Shorehan liuclear Power Station P.O. Box 610, llorth Country Road hading River,I4Y 11792

Dear Mr. Lecncrd:

SUBJECT:

fella FIllDIliGS Ch LILLO TRANSITI0li PLAN FOR SHOREP/I'.

The Fedr.rt.1 Er.ergency Management Agency (FEl%) has reviewed your letter cf August 2, 1985(SNRC-1190), which transmitted your response tc the FEMA findings developed as a result of the review by the Regional Assistance Comittee (RAC) of Revision 4 to the LILCO offsite Transiticr Plan for Shoreham.

Enclosed is a copy of a memorandum dated October 6, 1985, for William J. Dircks of the I:RC from Samuel W. Speck of fella which trar.smits the results of the RAC review of Revision 5 to the plan. You will also find enclosed a copy of a memorandur. cateo October 24, 1985 fron Richard W. Krimm of FEMA to Edward L.

Jordan of the NRC which contairs a correction to page 49 of the evaluation.

FEl% finos that six inadequate eierents still remain in Revision 5 and notes that five of these were identified as inadequate in the RAC review of Revision 4.

FEMA indicates that there is e lecal authority concern associateo with four of the inacequacles and that in some of the inadecuecies the legal issues are the major conccrrs.

[

u Walter R. Butler, Chief I.icensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated cc: See next page

A

!!r. John D. Leonard, Jr.

Shnreham Nuclecr Fower Station Long Island Lighting Company (list 3) cc:

Morton B. Margulies, Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Aoministrative Judge Board Panel Atomic Safety & Licensing Bocrd l'.S. Nuclear Regulatnry Comission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Dr. Jerry R. Kline Board Panel Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Washington, D.C.

20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conrnission Washington, D.C.

20555 Spence Perry, Esq.

Associate General Counsel Mr. Frederick J. Shon Federal Emergercy Mena5ecent Agency Acministrative Judge kcom 040, 500 C Street, SW Atonic Safety & Licensing Boaro Kashingten, D.C.

20472 l'.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555 Gerald C. Crotty, Esq.

Ben Wiles, Esq.

Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq.

Counsel to the Governor New York State Departnent of Executive Chamber - State Capitot Public Service Albany, New York 12224 Three Empire State Plaza Alta y, New York 12223 Herbert H. Brown, Esq.

Lawrence Coe Lampher, Esq.

W. leylor Reveley, III, Esq.

Karla J. Letsche, Esq.

Hunton & Williams Kirkpatrick & Leckhart 707 East Main Street 1500 N Strcct, N.H. - 8th Floor Pcst Office Box 1535 Washington, D.C.

20036 Richmond, Virginia 23212 Richard M. Kessel Ms. Donna D. Duer Chairman & Executive Director Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel New York State Consumer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Protection Board Washington, D.C.

20555 Room 1725 250 Broadway Regional Administrator, Region I t;ew York, New York 10007 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue James R. Dougherty, Esq.

King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 3045 Porter Street, NW Washington, D.C.

20008 Stephen B. Latham, Esq.

John F. Shea, III, Esq.

Stewart H. Glass, Esq.

Twomey, Latham & Shea Regional Counsel Attorneys at Law Federal Emergency Management Agency Pest Office Box 398 26 Federal Plaza - Room 1349 33 West Second Streeet New York, hew York 10278 Riverhead,f:ew York 11901

, Shoreham(3) cc:

Robert Abrams, Esq.

Anthony F. Earley, Jr., Esq.

Attorney General of the State General Counsel of New York Long Island Lighting Company ATTf:: Peter Bienstock, Esq.

176 East Gid County Road Department of Law Hicksville, i:cw York 11601 State of New York Two Ucrld Trade Center Mr. Lawrence Britt Room 46-14 Shoreham Nuclear Power Station

'New York, New York 10047 Post Office Ecx 618 Wading River, New York 11792 Mr. William Steiger Plant l'!anager hartin Bradley Ashare, Esq.

Shoreham Nuclear Pcwcr Station Suffolk County Attorney Post Office Cox 6EE P. Lee Dennison Building Wasing River, f:cu York 11792 Veteran's hemorial HiS way h

Hauppauge, New York 11700 f1B Technical Associates 1703 Htr.ilton Avenue - Suite K Noman L. Greene, Esq.

San Jose, California 95125 Guggenheimer & Untermyer 80 Pirc Street Honorable Peter Cchelcn Iew York, New York 10005 Suffolk County Executive County Executive / Legislative Building Mr. Robert Hoffnan Veterar's fitnorial Highway Ms. Susan Rosenfeld Hauppauge, New York 11706 lis. Sharlene Sherwin Post Office Box 1355 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger hassapequa, flew York 11758 New York State Energy Office A5ency Building 2 Erapire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Ms. Nora Bredes Shorehan. C'ppcr.cnts Coalition 195 East Main Street Smithtown, New York 117E7 Resident inspector Shoreham NPS U.S. Nuclear F.egulatory Commission Post Office Box B Rocky Point, New York 11776 Fabian G. Palomino, Esq.

Special Counsel to the Governor Executive Charbcr - State Capitol Albany, New York 122E4

e M

,,s 7

y

} Federal Emergency Management Agency 1

Y Washington, D.C. 20472 OCT 241915 MDf0 RANI 1N EDR: Edward L. Jordan Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement Nuc} ear Regu (to Commission FROM:

fp

'W. N1 Assistant Associate Director Office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs

SUBJECT:

Addendum to the FEMA Finding of Revision 5 of the Iong Island Lighting Conpany (LII40) Offsite Emergency Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station h is is to notify you of an administrative error recently discovered in the FEMA finding on Revision 5 of the LIILO Transition Plan for offsite emergency preparedness at the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station. 'lhis finding was sent to the Nuclear Regulatory Ccmnission on October 8,1985.

It was prepared by FEMA Region II and was the result of a full Regional Assistance Consnittee review.

'Ihe error concerned the section dealing with NUREG-0654 element J 12, and appears on page 49 of 66 in Attachment 1 to the finding letter itself (i.e., in the Regional Assistance Cmmittee consensus review of the Plan). The first paragraph of the J 12 review sent on October 8.1985 only applied to Pavision 4 of the Plan; it was left in the current review by mistake.

FEMA Region II has transmitted a corrected page 49, which is attached to this menorandum. 'Ihe erroneous paragraph has been deleted.

Please incorporate this corrected page in all Nuclear Regulatory Conunission copies of the FEMA finding package.

We regret any inconvenience that this oversight may have caused.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me.

/

Attachment As Stated

_ KI h u I o.- t.

u d L f 7/ Q JJ K

ATTACHMENT 1 LILCO Transition Plan for Shoreham - Revision 5 Consolidated RAC Review Dated September 23,1985 Page 49 of 66 (Rev. 10/85)

~

NUREC-0654 Element Review Comment (s)

Rating J.11 Maps are now referenced which include all of the (Cont'd) 50-mile ingestion pathway EPZ (see Procedure OPIP 3.6.6, page Ib of 50, page 5.1.12d; and page 4 of 50, 5.7).

The plan now includes references to taoles listing dairies, farms and food processing plants.

Maps of 50-mile EPZ are housed at the local EOC (see Plan, page 3.6-8a Procedure OPIP 3.6.6, Sections 5.1.1.2, 5.1.2.3, 5.1.3, 5.4, 5.4.1, 5.7, 5.8 and 7.0).

J.12 The plan describes how the maximum number of

'I evacuees would be monitored within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> (see Chapter 3, Section 3.9, B).

In Revision 5 of the plan, LILCO states that in order to monitor the maximum number of evacuees that might be expected to arrive at the Reception Center in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />, a minimum of 70 monitors will be necessary assuming it takes 1 1/2 minutes to monitor each evacuee.

LERO has additional monitors available to monitor vehicles and decon-taminated evacuees.

if these personnel are not needed for vehicle or decoittamination monitoring, they will be directed to assist in the initial monitoring of arriving evacuees.

In Procedure, OPIP 3.9.2, Attachment 3, page 3 of

  • 4, a flow diagram indicates vehicle interiors will be monitored if the exterior is contaminated; however, no action levels nor prescribed actions are indicated if the interior is contaminated. In addition, in the plan on page 4.2-1 and in procedures OPLP 4.2.3 and 3.9.2, there are statements which say that vehicle