ML20205A093
| ML20205A093 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 08/06/1986 |
| From: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Foster D GEORGIA POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608110301 | |
| Download: ML20205A093 (5) | |
Text
d Upb[Nd Wf s
AUG 0 61986 feorgia Power Company ATTN: Mr. D. O. Foster Vice President and General Manager Route 2 Box 299A Waynesboro, GA 30830
Dear Mr. Foster:
SUBJECT:
V0GTLE READINESS REVIEW - INTERIM REVIEW QUESTIONS - MODULE NO. 6,
" ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT" We have completed an initial review of Module 6, which you submitted to us on April 14, 1986, for evaluation. As a result of the review, the enclosure lists comments and questions which need clarification and a written response.
Please review the comments and provide a written response.
Your input is requested to be received on or before August 22, 1986.
Your assistance in responding to this request for additional information is appreciated.
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNEO BY VIRGIL L. BROWNLEE %
Roger D. Walker, Dir ctor Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
Vogtle Readiness Review Program -
Module No. 6, Questions and Clarifications cq w/ encl:
. b '. H. Miller, Jr.
J
- 8. President P. O'Reilly, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations d E. Conway, Senior Vice President &
d.ProjectDirector D. Rice, Vice President, Project Engineering R. H. Pinson, Vice President, Project Construction (cc w/ encl: Con't see page 2)
DOC O
l PD PD i
^
i TED I
5 mig 06 1996.
Georgia Power Company 2
(cc w/ enc 1: Cont'd)
- 4. T. Beckham, Vice President &
General Manager - Operations
. A. Thomas, Vice President, Licensing 4. S. Read, General Manager Quality Assurance W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality ssurance Manager
. C. Ramsey, Manager -
k eadiness Review R
B. Bockhold, General Manager, Nuclear Operations
&r. Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety
./ and Licensing
'M. H. Googe, Project Construction Manager
@. D. Groover, Quality Assurance Site Manager -
Construction pA. Bailey,ProjectLicensing
, Jianager W. F. Trowbridge, Esq., Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge y W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw, 4
Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge
- f. L. Blake, Jr., Esq., Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge d E. Joiner, Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman and Ashmore J.G.Ledbetter, Commissioner, Department of Human Resources d H. Badger, Office of Planning and Budget v D. Kirkland, III, Counsel, Office of the Consumer's Utility Council (A. C. Teper, Georgians Against Nuclear Energy J. B. Margulies, Esq., Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Dr. O. H. Paris, Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel F A Linenberger, Jr., Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board d anel P
P. Garde, Citizens Clinic, Director Government Accountability Project
AUG 0 01986 1
Georgia Power Company 3
c w/ encl:
Reis, ELD
. Brach, ED0 M. Sinkule, RII E. Christnot, RII NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of Georgia 1
RII RII RII ph 10 h
0 1" EChristnot:dm MSinkule VL8Fownlee LReyes 8/5/86 8/f /86 8/5'/86 8/5/86 j
1 ENCLOSURE V0GTLE READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM - MODULE NO. 6 QUESTIONS, AND CLARIFICATIONS NRR has completed an initial review of Module 6, Electrical Equipment, which was presented to the NRC on April 14, 1986. As a result of the review, one
. branch (Electrical, Instrumentation and Control Systems Branch) of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) has generated questions and clarifications which need a written response. Questions and comments which need a response are as follows:
Electrical, Instrumentation, and Control Systems Branch Commitment Number Commitment Subject Comment 133 Criteria for Safety-Related To be consistent Electrical Power Systems for with other com-Nuclear Power Plants mitment FSAR re-ferences (e.g.,
commitment #134),
FSAR section should be more explicitly identified as 1.9.32.1 rather than 1.9.32.
1552, 1553 Application of Single FSAR section should Failure Criterion be more explicitly identified as 1.9.53.1 rather that 1.9.53 1264 Qualification Test and Indicates commitment Analysis to RG 1.100.
SRP 3.11 of EQ of Mechanical Electrical Equipment does not require direct compliance with this guide.
This guide is primarily applicable to Section 3.10, Seismic Qualification of Cate-gory 1, Instrumentation and Electrical Equipment.
i
~
l o
eo Enclosure 2
Commitment Number Commitment Subject Comment 2361, 2376, 2380 Various FSAR section should 2382,2383 be more explicitly l
identified by stating the exact subsection in which commitment is identified.
If there are any further questions regarding this review, we will be pleased to discuss them.