ML20204J517
| ML20204J517 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 10/17/1988 |
| From: | Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20204J506 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-445-88-64, 50-446-88-60, NUDOCS 8810250162 | |
| Download: ML20204J517 (2) | |
Text
f l'
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION TU Electric Dockets:
50-445/88-64 50-446/88-60 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Permits:
CPPR-126 Units 1 and 2, Glen Rose, Texas CPPR-127 During a NRC inspection conducted on September 9 through October 4, 1988, one vio'ation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Preacdu"o for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, as implemented by Section 5.0, Revision 3, of the TU Electric Quality Assurance Plan, requires that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by and accomplished in accordance with documented instructions, procedures, or drawings.
Contrary to the above, welds were not installed in accordance with applicable drawings in the following two examples:
1.
Two undersized welds on the support st::ucture for pipe whip restraints MS-1-002-911-C67W, MS-1-002-912-C67W, MS-1-002-913-C67W, and MS-1-dO2-914-C67W were identified.
Drawing 2323-S1-0576, Figure 7, Revision 3, specifies 5/16-inch fillet welds along the edges of 1/2-inch plates.
The two welds are at least 1/16-inch undersized for the full length of the weld.
2.
On tha same pipe whip restraint support structure as example 1 a single square groove weld was installed in areas where two 1/4-inch fillet welds are specified by DCA 13425, Revision 4.
This welding discrepancy was not identified during an inspection conducted to PCHVP Procedure NQI-3.09-M-004, Revision 5, "Field Verification of Pipe Whip Restraints."
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)
(445/8864-V-02).
8810230162 G81017 PDR ADOCK 0500044'5 o
2 t
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, TU ElectricLis hereby required to submit a written statemer.t.or explanation to the U. S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC, 20555, with a copy to the Assistant Director for Inspection Proerams, Comanche Peak Project Division, Office of Special Project., witi41n 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation:
(1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, t
(3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in j
this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
Where good cause is i
shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
/PF&&
Dated at Comanche Peak Site this 17th day of October 1988 I
i i
}
}
l
---,, ---