|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20100L3581996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Submitting Corrected Version of Plant Decommissioning TS Updated to Reflect All Approved Amends ML20082K2461995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Administrative Control 5.3.1,reflecting Organizational Changes That Impact Membership of Decommissioning Safety Review Committee ML17291B3261993-05-18018 May 1993 Proposed TS Section 2.2 Re Activated Graphite Blocks,Section 2.4 Re Channel Calibr & SR 3.2.1 Re Verification of Reactor Bldg Pressure & SR 3.2.2 Re Verification of Pressure Drop Across Each HEPA Filter ML20118B2141992-09-25025 September 1992 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Replacing Radiation Safety with Nuclear Safety, Revising Applicability Requirements for Specs Dealing W/Reactor Bldg Confinement Integrity & Clarifying Items Re Unreviewed Safety Questions ML20096H1961992-05-19019 May 1992 Decommissioning TS Deleting Section 4.2.15 Re LCO 4.2.15 Covering Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20095B0951992-04-14014 April 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Organization,Review & audit-administrative Controls ML20094L2831992-03-19019 March 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Controls & Limits Appropriate for Decommissioning ML20086C5301991-11-15015 November 1991 Proposed Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20091D7631991-10-11011 October 1991 Proposed,Revised Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel Cooling Water Sys Temp ML20082L9311991-08-30030 August 1991 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decommissioning ML20066A3781990-12-21021 December 1990 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Re Reactor Bldg Integrity,Reactor Bldg Ventilation Exhaust Sys,Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation & Pcrv Shielding Water Tritium Concentration ML20059L5891990-09-14014 September 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Design Features Section 6.1 to Permit Removal of CRD & Orifice Assemblies from Core Regions Defueled in Support of Plant Closure Activities ML20042F3151990-04-26026 April 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Defueling ML20006B7921990-01-25025 January 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Title Changes to Section 7.1 ML19332F3561989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Condition for Operations 4.7.3, Fuel Storage Wells & 4.7.5, Instrumentation. ML19332E8901989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control & Control Rod Pair Position Requirements During Shutdown ML19332C8151989-11-21021 November 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Items 2.D.(1) & 2.D.(4) Re Max Power Level & Early Shutdown,Respectively ML19324B6961989-10-30030 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Core & Reactivity Control ML19327B1321989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deleted Limiting Conditions of Operations 4.1.2 Through 4.1.6,deleted Surveillance Requirements 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3 & 5.1.5 & Newly Added Reactivity Control Section ML19351A3271989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs 6.1 Re Defueling Phase Document Design Features ML20248G4731989-10-0101 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re End of Operations ML20248G4461989-09-30030 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Chlorine Detection & Alarm Sys & Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys ML20247G7811989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Documenting Design Features for Defueling Phase of Operation ML20247L1721989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control ML20247J2371989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Fuel Handling & Storage ML20247G7341989-09-14014 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Fire Protection Limiting Condition of Operation & Surveillance Requirements from Tech Specs ML20246K9921989-07-14014 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Documenting Improvements to Battery Surveillance Procedures ML20246L0231989-07-14014 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Rewording Basis for Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.2 Re Operable Circulator ML20244B3771989-06-0909 June 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Early Shutdown of Plant ML20245B3211989-04-14014 April 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Radiation Monitors & Noble Gas Monitors ML20155J6281988-10-14014 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Concerning Administrative Controls ML20155J6111988-10-14014 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Pcrv & Pcrv Penetration Overpressure Protection Surveillance ML20204E8171988-10-13013 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Linear channel-high Neutron Flux Trip Setpoints ML20207E1591988-08-0505 August 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Auxiliary Electric Sys Involving Proposed Change of Dc Batteries ML20155J7181988-06-14014 June 1988 Revised Draft Tech Specs 3/4.6.5.2,deleting Charcoal Filter Test Exceptions After Painting W/Low Solvent paints,6.5.1.2 & 6.2.3.3,reflecting Recent Util Reorganization & 3/4.7.1.5 & 3/4.7.1.6,requiring One Operable Valve Per Loop ML20151R8191988-04-20020 April 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting 10CFR51.5(b)2 ML20151S2471988-04-20020 April 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Pages 4.6-4 & 4.6-8,allowing Up to 5 Consecutive Days to Perform Equalizing Charge W/Station Battery ML20148N2751988-03-29029 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirement to Monitor Ambient Temp in Instrument Penetrations Housing Flow Sensors for Dewpoint Moisture Monitoring Sys ML20149M2901988-02-0808 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Re Plant Protective Sys Trip Setpoint & Operating Requirements ML20149N0391988-02-0505 February 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changes to Administrative Controls to Reflect Organizational Changes in Util & NRC ML20238C3481987-12-23023 December 1987 Proposed re-drafted Tech Specs,Upgrading Sections Re safety- Related Cooling Sys.Related Info Encl ML20236C6361987-10-15015 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Fire Protection Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements ML20235W8611987-10-0101 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Actions on Inoperable Halogen or Particulate Monitors & Conditions Requiring Weekly Gamma Spectral Analysis on Inservice Gas Waste Tank ML20235B0091987-08-28028 August 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Trip Setpoints & Operating Requirements ML20216H7301987-06-25025 June 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Definition of Calculated Bulk Core Temp & Core Average Inlet Temp for Determination of Core Temp ML20210B7081987-04-23023 April 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance & Calibr Requirements of Plant Protective Sys Parameters ML20206P3931987-04-0808 April 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising 3/4.1.7, Reactivity Change W/Temp to Be Consistent W/Increased Values for Calculated Reactivity Worth of Reserve Shutdown Sys,Per Rev 4 to FSAR, Section 3.5.3.3 ML20207P9911987-01-15015 January 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Requiring Both evaporator-economizer Superheater Sections & Both Reheater Sections to Be Available During Operation at Power as Min Number of HXs ML20207D2421986-12-23023 December 1986 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Snubber Tables & Correcting Typos ML20212A0661986-12-19019 December 1986 Proposed Tech Specs Re Steam Line Rupture Detection/ Isolation Sys 1996-02-22
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20148U0111997-06-17017 June 1997 Confirmatory Survey of Group E Effluent Discharge Pathway Areas Fsv Nuclear Station Platteville,Co ML20133D7661996-09-16016 September 1996 Confirmatory Survey Plan for Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project ML20129A4621996-09-11011 September 1996 Rev 0 to Fsv Decommissioning Project Final Survey Requirements for Liquid Effluent Pathway ML20100L3581996-02-22022 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Submitting Corrected Version of Plant Decommissioning TS Updated to Reflect All Approved Amends ML20097C2601996-01-17017 January 1996 Confirmatory Survey Activities Plan for Fsv Nuclear Station PSC Platteville,Co ML20101F2091995-09-18018 September 1995 Issue 7 to DPP 5.4.2, Odcm ML20084B8801995-05-25025 May 1995 Rev 1 to Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Plan for Site Release ML20084B6881995-05-10010 May 1995 Issue 5 to Fire Protection Operability Requirements (Fpor) FPOR-7, Fire Extinguishers ML20082K2461995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Administrative Control 5.3.1,reflecting Organizational Changes That Impact Membership of Decommissioning Safety Review Committee ML20082T2151995-04-12012 April 1995 Issue 7 to Fire Protection Operability Requirements (Fpor) FPOR-12, Fire Detectors ML20082B9411995-03-17017 March 1995 Confirmatory Survey Plan for Repower Area,Fort St Vrain, Platteville,Co ML20082C0801995-03-16016 March 1995 Proposed Confirmatory Survey Plan for Repower Area,Fort St Vrain,Platteville,Co ML20082B9821995-03-15015 March 1995 Instrumentation Comparison Plan Between Orise & Fort St Vrain ML20086S2471995-02-0909 February 1995 Decommissioning Plan for Fort St Vrain Nuclear Generating Station ML20077C7171994-11-30030 November 1994 Issue 9 to FPOR-14, Fire Protection Operability Requirements ML20078C0641994-10-12012 October 1994 Revised Fire Protection Operability Requirements,Including Issue 21 to Depp Table of Contents,Issue 2 to FPOR-22 & Issue 3 to FPOR-23 ML20081J7951994-09-15015 September 1994 Issue 5 to DPP 5.4.2, Odcm ML20063M1551994-02-17017 February 1994 Rev 0 to Fsv Nuclear Station Decommissioning Project Final Survey Plan for Site Release ML20057A6151993-08-30030 August 1993 Issue 2 to FPOR-23, Fire Water Makeup Sys ML17291B3261993-05-18018 May 1993 Proposed TS Section 2.2 Re Activated Graphite Blocks,Section 2.4 Re Channel Calibr & SR 3.2.1 Re Verification of Reactor Bldg Pressure & SR 3.2.2 Re Verification of Pressure Drop Across Each HEPA Filter ML20118B2141992-09-25025 September 1992 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Replacing Radiation Safety with Nuclear Safety, Revising Applicability Requirements for Specs Dealing W/Reactor Bldg Confinement Integrity & Clarifying Items Re Unreviewed Safety Questions ML20114D6871992-09-0101 September 1992 Tritium Leach Test on H-327 Graphite ML20096H1961992-05-19019 May 1992 Decommissioning TS Deleting Section 4.2.15 Re LCO 4.2.15 Covering Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20095B0951992-04-14014 April 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Organization,Review & audit-administrative Controls ML20094L2831992-03-19019 March 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Re Controls & Limits Appropriate for Decommissioning ML20086C5301991-11-15015 November 1991 Proposed Tech Spec Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Pcrv Cooling Water Sys Temps ML20079M4261991-10-11011 October 1991 Revised Abnormal Operating Procedures,Reflecting Deletion of Issue 9 of EP Class ML20091D7631991-10-11011 October 1991 Proposed,Revised Limiting Condition for Operation 4.2.15 Re Prestressed Concrete Reactor Vessel Cooling Water Sys Temp ML20082L9311991-08-30030 August 1991 Proposed Tech Specs Re Decommissioning ML20082H8851991-08-16016 August 1991 Issue 2 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-I-2, Chemical, Petroleum & Hazardous Waste Spill Response ML20091C4141991-08-0202 August 1991 Issue 58 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-L, Loss of Instrument Air Header ML20024H3341991-05-10010 May 1991 Nonproprietary Rev 2 to FSV-P-SCP-100, Fort St Vrain Initial Radiological Site Characterization Program Program Description ML20072V5291991-04-12012 April 1991 Revised Defueling Emergency Response Plan,Including Section 1 Definitions,Section 2 Scope & Applicability,Section 3 Summary of Fsv Derp,Section 4 Emergency Classifications & Section 5 Emergency Organization ML20070V6871991-03-20020 March 1991 Issue 55 to Abnormal Operating Procedure AOP-R, Loss of Access to Control Room ML20072S0521991-03-15015 March 1991 Public Version of Revised Crisis Mgt Implementing Procedures,Including Rev 9 to CMIP-11, Classification of Emergency for McGuire Nuclear Station & Rev 11 to CMIP-12, Classification of Emergency for Oconee Nuclear Station ML20066J1171991-02-15015 February 1991 Issue 56 to Intro Section of Abnormal Operating Procedure (Aop),Issue 58 of AOP-A,Issue 58 to AOP-B,Issue 56 of AOP D-1 & Issue 2 of RERP-TRANSPORTATION ML20066A3781990-12-21021 December 1990 Proposed Decommissioning Tech Specs Re Reactor Bldg Integrity,Reactor Bldg Ventilation Exhaust Sys,Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation & Pcrv Shielding Water Tritium Concentration ML20059L5891990-09-14014 September 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Design Features Section 6.1 to Permit Removal of CRD & Orifice Assemblies from Core Regions Defueled in Support of Plant Closure Activities ML20058N1071990-08-10010 August 1990 Issue 56 to AOP-I, Discussion of Fire ML20042F3151990-04-26026 April 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Defueling ML20006B7921990-01-25025 January 1990 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Title Changes to Section 7.1 ML19332E8901989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control & Control Rod Pair Position Requirements During Shutdown ML19332F3561989-12-0404 December 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Condition for Operations 4.7.3, Fuel Storage Wells & 4.7.5, Instrumentation. ML19332C8151989-11-21021 November 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Items 2.D.(1) & 2.D.(4) Re Max Power Level & Early Shutdown,Respectively ML20064B2111989-11-0909 November 1989 Fort St Vrain Cycle 4 RT-500L Test Rept ML19324B6961989-10-30030 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Core & Reactivity Control ML19327B1321989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deleted Limiting Conditions of Operations 4.1.2 Through 4.1.6,deleted Surveillance Requirements 5.1.1,5.1.2,5.1.3 & 5.1.5 & Newly Added Reactivity Control Section ML19351A3271989-10-13013 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs 6.1 Re Defueling Phase Document Design Features ML20248G4731989-10-0101 October 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re End of Operations ML20248G4461989-09-30030 September 1989 Proposed Tech Specs Re Chlorine Detection & Alarm Sys & Control Room Emergency Ventilation Sys 1997-06-17
[Table view] |
Text
- - -.
i r
t I
i l
9 r
l-
[
Attachment 2 To P-88379 l i
SUMMARY
OF PROPOSED CHANGES b
t t
b t
k I
t a
?
I f
F L
i E
(-
t PDR8010210456 08101.3 P
i ADOCK 05000267 5 PDC 4 t
I
P-88379 Page 2 Attachment 2 October 13, 1988 SECTION LCO 4.4.1 Page 4.4-2. Modify the requirement to shut down the reactor within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> following a power reduction resulting in noncompliance with Figure 3.3-1, to permit 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> to reset detectors per Figure 3.3-1 and an additional 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to shut down the reactor if compliance is not accomplished.
Page 4.4-2. Also, revise actions for Table 4.4-3 to specify actions to "shut down" in lieu of "shutdown" for editorial clarification.
Page 4.4-3b. Correct Items 6 and 7 to read "see Table 3.3-1" instead of "see Table 3.3-2". Table 3.3-2 does not exist.
I i,
t i
C i
3 .
l Attachment 3 l i-To P-88379 !
,t 2
PROPOSED REVISIONS TO LCO 4.4.1 -
l OF THE FSV TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
}
l a
)
I J r i ;
I i i k t i I-i L
4 t
I
~ i l
F I
c ;
t l
F F
I i ,
h L
Fort St. Vrain #1 Technical Specifications
. Amendment #
Page 4.4-2 l For Tacle 4.4-1, the reactor ..all be shut dcwn witnin l 12 nours with two exceptions:
l a. To facilitate maintenance on the Plant Protective System (PPS) moisture menitors, the moisture monitor input trio functions to the Plant Protective System wnich cause scram, loop shutdown, circulator trip, and steam water dump may be disabled for up to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
During the time tnat the Plant Protective System moisture monitor trips are disabled, an observer in direct communication with the reactor operator shall be positioned in the control room in the location of pertinent instrumentation. The observer shall continuously monitor the prima ry coolant moisture levels indicated by at least two moisture monitors and the primary coolant pressure indications, and shall alert the reautor operator to any indicated moisture or pressure change. During the time in which the trip functions are disabled the requirements of LCO's 4.2.10 and 4.2.11 shall be met and primary coolant shall not exceed a moisture concentratton of 100 ppmv.
l b. Tne linear enannel-nign neutron flux TRIP SETPOINTS l must be in compliance with tre recuirements of Figure l 3.3-1 within 12 nours after a cower reduction where a l different TRIP SETPOINT is acciicable, or the reactor l shall oe shut cown witnin the next 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
For Table 4.4-2, the affected loop shall be shut down within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
For Table 4.4-3, perform one of the following witnin 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />s:
I a. Tne reactor shall be shut cown, or I i
l b. tne affected helium circulator shall ce shut down.
For Table 4.4-4, the reactor snall ce shut d wn within 24 hcurs.
If, witnia the irdicated time limit, tne minimur num0er of opera:1e :maanels and tne minimum cegree of recurdancy can be reestsolisnec, the system is censidered normal and no furteer 1:tior needs to be tasen.
l e
Fort St. Vrain #1
. Technical Specifications
. Amendment No.
Page 4.4-3b Sce:1fication LCO 4.4.1 Table 4.4-1 (Part 1)
INSTRUMENT OoERATING REQUIREwENTS FOR PLANT PROTECTIVE SYSTEM. SCRAM TRIP ALLOWABLE NO. FUNCTIONAL UNIT SETPOINT VALUE I 6. Primary Coolant Pressure ---------See Table 3.3-1---------
-Programmed Low l 7. Primary Coolant Pressure ---------See Tatie 3.3-1---------
-Programmed High
- 8. Hot Reheat Header Pressure > 44 psig 3 43 psig
-Lom
- 9. Main Steam Pressure-Lo. 31529 psig 31517 psig
- 10. Plant Electrical System-Loss > 2?dV > 266V 331.5 Seconds 335 Seconds
- 11. Two Looo Trovele Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 12. High Rea: tor Building $ 161 cegree F $ 166 cegree F Temperature (Pice Cavity)
Notes for Tables 4.4 1 through 4.4-4 are or Pages 4.4 8 and 4.4-9
4 Attachment 4 To P-88379 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION ANALYSIS
}
)
P-88379 Page 2 Attachment 4 October 13, 1988 SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALVATION: i The proposed Amendment would modify Technical Specification Section LCO 4.4.1, which provides a listing of the Plant Protective !
System (PPS) instrumentation parameters and the associated bases. I r
The PPS is the ret.ctor protective circuitry and the etreuitry '
oriented towards protecting various plant components from major :
danage. !
The Technical Specification LCO 4.4.1 has been modified to -
clarify the time permitted to reset trip setpoints per the detector decalibration curve, Figure 3.3-1, for the linear channel - high neutron flux channalt following a power reduction.
If the linear channel - high neutron flux channels are outside their ALLOWABLE VALUES, they must be considered inoperable and the appropriate actions apply. The linear channel - high neutron flux RWP and scram will be available but may not be set properly.
Amendment 60 requires a plant shutdown within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. There are various plant situations where power level is automatically reduced and the applicable TRIP SETPOINTS for the linear channel - high neutron flux channels change.
To avoid unnecessary shutdown requirements af ter control rod runback or power reduction events, PSC proposes that an action be r added to the FSV Technical Specifications that allows 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> after ;
a power reduction to regain compliance with Figure 3.3-1 for linear '
channel - high neutron flux. This added action provides a reasonable period ef time to regait! con 11ance, either by adjusting the TRIP !
SETPOINf 5 or by changing power level, during which the iinear channel l
- high neutron flux RWP and scram (which may be improperly set), and I the reheat steam temperature-high scrae provide protection against an l unexpected increase in power level. The likelihood of a rod !
withdrawal accident (for which these scram parameters provide l protection) is small. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> nrderly shutdown requirement !
reduces rapic transients on plant components and is consistent with i actions includad in the FSV Technical Specification Upgrade Program j draf t, submitte.d in Reference 3 (P-88184). ;
BASIS FOR N0 SIG'4IFICANT HAZARDS _ DETERMINATION! [
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant ha:Ards consideration because operation of the Fort St. Vrain Nuclear l Generating Station in accordance with this change would not: [
i
P 88379 Page 3 Attachment 4 October 13, 1988
- 1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. '
The linear channel - high neutron flux parameters are part of the Plant Protective System (PPS). The primary function .
of the linear channel - high neutron flux parameters is to E provide a scram prior to reactor power exceeding 140*. of rated power. Additional protection is provided by a rod withdrawal prohibit prior to reactor power exceeding 120?, of rated power. These high neutron flux scram and RWP actions are backed up by the PPS reheat steam temperature -
high scram. Section 14.2.2 of the FSAR analyzes accident scenarioc that would produce reactor power levels of 140*. of rated power. The condition that is most likely to cause an increase in power level of this nature is a rod withdrawal accident. Section 14.2.2.6 analy:es maximum worth control rod pair withdrawal at full power. Included are scenarios where the reactor is scrammed 88 seconds and 105 seconds af ter accident initiation by the reheat steam temperature -
high scram. These accident analyses are not modified by this amendment.
- 2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previcusly evaluated.
FSAR Section 14.2.2 contains the analysis of core reactivity accidents. Permitting a reasonable amount of time to regain compliance with Figure 3.3-1 for the linear channel - high neutron flux channels and a reasonable amount of time to shut down the reactor in an orderly manner does not change that analysis
- 3) Invo' eve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The margin of safety a g a i r,st an increase in reactivity accident is provided by five protective actions identified in FSAR Section 14.2.2.1. This amendment clarifies the time that is available to regain compliance with Figure 3.3-1 for two of these protective actions following a power reduction that chsnges the applicable trip setpoints for the linear channels. Any reduction of safety during this time is not significant in that all fivt protective actions are available. (The RWP and scram for the linear channels may be improperly set on an interim bases.) The effectiveness of the other three protective actions is analyzed in FSAR Section 14.2.2.6. The other protective actions include reheat steam temperature - high scram, manual scram, and manual actuation of the reserve shutdown system.
?"
O s ,
P-88379 Page 4 Attachment 4 October 13, 1983 In this requested rovision to LCO 4.4.1 for the power reduction situation, 22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br /> woLid be permitted to ensure proper trip setpoints for the linear channel - high neutron flux channels. This could include either adjusting the trip
- setpoints for the lower power level, or increasing reactor power, if appropriate. Also, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> would be permitted to effect an orderly shutdown of the reacto: in the unlikely event that compliance with Figure 3.3-1 could not be regained. Interim Technical Specification LCO 3.1.5 permits 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to restore the control rods to an acceptable configuration following a_ control rod runback. The resetting of the trip setpoints must be done after the control rods are restored to an acceptable configuration.
The twelve hours includes time to position the control rods to conform to the requirements of interim Technical Specification LCO 3.1.5.
PSC considers this change to LCO 4.4.1 justified because adequate protective actions remain in place and a rod i withdrawal accident is a low probability event. During the
- int 1rval in which P e high neutron flux scram trip setpoint may not be in compliance with Figure 3.3-1, the reheat steam l temperature - high scram would be available to protect
]
against an unc~oected increase in reactor power. The RWP and scram due nigh neutron flux would be available but
, may not actuate by the 120% or 140% analyzed values. The i manual scram is also available in addition to the automatic scram and RWP actions.
I I
5 1
I i
I 1