ML20203P760

Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-440/86-09 & 50-441/86-03 on 860414-17.No Violations Noted.Summary of Exercise Weaknesses Requiring Corrective Action,Per 10CFR50,App E,Encl

ML20203P760
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	04/30/1986
From:	Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Edelman M, Edleman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
Shared Package
ML20203P761	List: IR 05000440/1986009 ML20203P760
References
NUDOCS 8605080122
Download: ML20203P760 (3)

See also: IR 05000440/1986009

Text

.- .,

..

s

..

APR 3 01986

Docket No. 50-440

Docket No. 50-441

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company

ATTN: Mr. Murray R. Edelman

Vice President

Nuclear Group

Post Office Box 5000

Cleveland, OH 44101

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. W. Snell and

others of this office on April 14-17, 1986, of activities at Perry Nuclear Power

Plant, Units 1 and 2, authorized by NRC Facility Operating License No. NPF-45

and Construction Permit No. CPPR-149 and to the discussion of our findings with

Mr. A. Kaplan and others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this

inspection. However, weaknesses were identified which will need corrective

action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the attachment to

this letter " Exercise Weaknesses." As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E,

IV.F, any weaknesses that are identified must be corrected.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

this letter, the enclosures, and any response to this letter will be placed

in the NRC Public Document Room.

8605000122 860430

PDR ADOCK 05000440

G PDR

S

.

'

.

.

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating 2

Company APR 3 0 886

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

ga agned by SP 8*'#

W. D. Shafer, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosures:

1. Exercise Weaknesses

2. Inspection Reports

No. 50-440/86009(DRSS);

No. 50-441/86003(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosures:

J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry

Plant Technical Department

M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant

Operations Department

L. O. Beck, General Supervising

Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and

Fuel Management Section

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

James W. Harris, State of Ohio

Robert H. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

RIII RIi:I RII RIII R

V&

er/kst ih($

S St Sne

l$5

Ak

Knop

h

S r

I

VEf

.-- .- . . - - . - . - - -_ _ .. - - .- .-- -

-

.

?

4

EXERCISE WEAKNESSES

i

1. The notification for the declaration of an Alert to the Coast Guard

was not made during the required timeframe of 15 minutes. (50-440/86009-01;

50-441/86003-01) (Paragraph 5.a.2).

2. The inplant team responding to the simulated injured / contaminated man did

not provide complete information to the Control Room regarding the accident

site situation. (50-440/86009-02; 50-441/86003-02) (Paragraph 5.a.3).

3. . Procedural criteria for downgrading an Emergency Action Level (EAL) to a

lesser level were not considered in downgrading the Action Level, and an

unapproved form was utilized in recovery planning. (50-440/86009-03;

50-441/86003-03) (Paragraph 5.b.1).

e

1

.