ML20203N414

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Offers No Further Comment on Proposed Amend to 10CFR2 Re Establishing Special Ex Parte in Camera Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning Disclosure or Nondisclosure of Info
ML20203N414
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/12/1984
From: Martin R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Cunningham G
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML20203N408 List:
References
FRN-48FR36358, RULE-PR-2 AB78-1-056, AB78-1-56, NUDOCS 8610080257
Download: ML20203N414 (1)


Text

_ _ _ . - - -_. _ - .

1

- MEL ff December 12, 1984

) M"f"/ p!

PT)0 MEMDRANDUM FOR: Guy R. Cunningham, III Executive Legal Director v FROM: Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator, Region IV i

SUBJRCT: NRC STATEMENT OF FOLICY ON INVRSTIGATIONS. INSFRCTION

) AND ADJUDICATORT FROCEEDINGS - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO j 10 CFR FART 2. RSTABLISHING SFRCIAL RI PARTE IN CAMERA j PROCRDURES FOR RRSOLVING CONFLICTS CONCERNING THE DISCIASURE OR NONDISCIASURE OF INFORMATION I

Fursuant to your request, we have reviewed the revision of the subject Federal Register motice of proposed rulemaking to amend 10 CFR Part 2 which reflected commants received from NRC staff offices, including RIV,

) in response to William Olmstead's memorandum of October 22, 1984. A i draft transmission paper transmitting the Federal Register notice of

) proposed rulamaking to the Commission was also attached.

We consider this revision a marked improvement over the original draft

, version and we have no further comments other than to point out a possible ambiguity over the reference on page 2 of the draf t tran-ission paper and elsewhere to an "in_ camera without other parties present" presentation and an "ex parte in camera oral presentation." While we discussed the a matter with Jane Mopes and she adequately explained that "without other parties present" meant a " paper presentation" as opposed to the other ,

j referenced " oral presentation," we believe that without some clarification l

in the documents themselves, two references may cause confusion to some. ,

l This response represents the comments of both myself and the other RIV l

{ addressee, William L. Brown, Regional Counsel. {

4 Original s' r.ed by:: l i 8610090257 860930 Robert D. l.!artin  !

PR PDR l 2 48FR36358 PDR Robert D. Martin 3 Regional Administrator I

cc: T. Murley, Regional Administrator, RI J. O'Reilly, Regdonal Administrator, RII l

J. Rappler, Regional Administrator, RIII l

l J. Martin, Regional Administrator, RV -

_ - - bec: J. Lieberman, OELD AA -

-> .g g... = ;( @ .................. ........... ......... .......... .......... ..................... ....................

.m.,u.,y.... ...u.,u.,85.... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ....................

DATEh .................. .................... ..................... .................... ..................... .................... ...................

usc ronu sia no.coinacu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

-._ _ ___, _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . ._ . _ - . __ _ _ - -