ML20203L440
| ML20203L440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1998 |
| From: | Gibson G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9803060057 | |
| Download: ML20203L440 (5) | |
Text
..
i
, 3' %-
8,00Hil RN C Atif 0R%t a EDISON An i18(AON iVil #% 4T10% 4L Conipny March 2,1998 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-206,50-361, r 150-362 Semlannual 10 CFR 26 Fitne.,,or Duty Program Data San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1,2, and 3 Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.71(d), this submittal provHes the required semiannual Fitness For Duty program e-+=1ance data for the period of July 1,1997 to December 31, 1997 (Attrhment t
..achment 2 is a summary of information and management actions for &.e reporting period.
If you require any additional information, please so adviso.
Sincerely,
)
G. T. Gibson Manager, Compliance.
1 Attachments:
10 CFR 26 Performance Data cc:
w/ enciosures E. W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV M. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 & 3 L. L. Wheeler, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Unit 1
(
D. B. Spitzberg, NRC Region IV, San Onofre Unit 1 fgrO cc:
w/o enclosures y
J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, Units 2 & 3 9803060057 960302 PDR ADOCK 05000206 PDR h
lll hl R
I' O M 128 San Clememe. CA 42n74 0128
Att: chm:nt i Pege 1 of 2 Fitness for Duty Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 Southem Califomia Edison July,1 December 31,1997 i
Company 6 Months Ending San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Location S. L. Blue, Adm:nistrator, Fitness For Duty (714) 368-2482 Contact Name.
Phone Number Cutoffs:
Screen / Confirmation (ng/ml)
Marijuana 50/10 Barbiturates 300/200 Cocaine 300/150 Benzodiazepine 300/300
\\
Oplates 300/300 Methadone 300/200 Amphetamines 1000/500 Propoxypheno 300/200 Methamphetamine 1000/500 Phencyclindile 25/25 Amohetamir,e
/200 Alcohol (%B/ C)
.04 Testing Results SCE Employees Contractor Personnel Total (Short term or.ly)
Average Number w"ih Unescorted Access 162a 592 223E
^..wgories
- Tests
- Failures
- Tests
- Failures Pre Access
._.151 0
_ 321 5
For cause:
Observed Behavior 0
0 5
1 Post Accident
_Q
__Q 0
0 Random
.f32 1
_1,13 1
Follow-Up 11 0
17
.__ Q 01her
_.32
_D
_21 0
Total
.Hg1 1
.424 7
Number of Employees Referred To Mandatosy Treatment 1
Number of PersonnelWith Access Restored Employees O
Contract
__2 Total Number of Random Tests _10_1 Random Testing Rate 25.70%
a g
.___Q
Attach nent 1 Page 2 of 2 Table 1, ej.ANDOM TESTING PROGRAM RESULTS I
Individuals 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997
- Failed 10 15 2
1 4
6 3
5 3
2
- Tested 194 2148 996 701 952 759 632 725 838 601
% Failed
.5%
.7%
.2%
.2%
.4%
.8%
0%
.7 %
.4%
.3%
i Table 2, BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS FOR SPECIFIC SUBSTANCES Includes multiple submittats/ substances datected.
L uariiuana CoC Aur BARS aExzo '
oel PRoe Eron 100/15a 50/10h Licensee Employees 0
0 0
0 2
3 3
2 1
Contract Workers 1
2 1
i 2
2 0
1 3
Total l
Totals 1
2 I
1 4
5 3
3 4
23
- onsite Presumptive n/a 2
1 a -NRCLevels b -SCELevels
- Certified Lab n/a 2
1 l
Confirmation Ratio n/a 100 %
100 %
Table 3, BREAKDOWN OF ALL CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS CAUSING FAILURES Marijuana Cocaine Methamphetamine Alcohol
[
' Licensee Employees 0
0 0
1 Contract Workers 2
1 1
3 Total Total,
'2 I
I I
4 8
1 Summary of Infmaation and Management Actions for tne Reporting Period.
(July 1,1997 -December 31,1997) 1.
There were no iemporary suspensions or other administrative actions taken against individuals based upon on-site presumptive positivos for marijuana or cocaine.
2.
A total of eight (8) individuals (one (1) employee and seven (7) contract workers]
had unescorted Protected Area (PA) access withdrawn for a min! mum of 80 work hours fo' lowing a substance test failure.
Five (5) contract workers were denied unescorted PA access following a pre-badging substance test failure.
One (1) employee and one (1) contract worker failed a random test and ht.d unescorted PA access withdrawn for a minimum of 80 work hours.
Onef sontract worker was permanently denied site and unescorted access following a For Cause substance test failure.
3.
There was one disciplinary suspension from employment during the reporting period.
4.
There were no transfers of licensee employees to non-nuclear positions (away from the San Onofre site) as a result of failed substance tests.
d.
One employee was required to enroll in a treatment program during this period.
6.
Two (2) contract worker were granted (reinstated) unescorted access with a single test failure on record.
7.
The Medical Review Officer (MRO) reviewed a total of eight (8) appeal results (one (1) employee, seven (7) contract workers]. The original test results were confirmed. These individuals were provided with detailed instructions regarding their rights to appeal management actions which resulted in access denial. Two (2) contract workers left site prior to meeting with the MRO, resulting in non-contact positive tests.
or
8.
There were no identified deficiencies in the Fitness For Duty program.
9.
As depicted in Tetle 2, there were (23) samples confirmed by the I.ab as positive. As shown in Table 3, only eight (8) individuals were asscciated with MRO failed test declaraticns. Dus to Southem Califomia Edison recollection procedure, severalindividuals submitted multiple positive samples resulting in a single declared individual failure. Positive tests for prescription medications were declared responsible use by the MRO.
10.
During this period there was one reportable event to the Commission.
On September 18,1997, Southern California Edison Company made telephone notification to the NRC Operations Center in accordance with 10 CFR 26.73(a)(2), upon learning that a supervisor had tested positive for alcohol following a random selection for a Fitness for Duty test.
The individual's uneecorted access was immediately suspended pending an appeal.
No actual entry into the PA was made. The supervisor will be required to coniplete a substance abuse program prior to resuming his duties within the PA.
Page 2 of 2