ML20203C422
| ML20203C422 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1995 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082460465 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-97-469 NUDOCS 9802250183 | |
| Download: ML20203C422 (5) | |
Text
..-.
g /f '
)
I MILLSTONE ASSESSMENT PANEL k
I MEETING MINUTES 4
MARCH 17,1995 ATTENDEES:
J. Jacobson J. Trapp N. Bluuberg P. Mc Kee L. Nicholson R. Cooper G. Vissing R. Barkley P. Swetland j
J. Durr A meeting of the Millstone Assessment Panel was called to discuss the following items: (See attached agenda)
PLANT STATUS UPDATE A plant status update was presented by the senior residant inspector.
He noted that the outage was progressing very slowly and that the restart date was currently advertised as April 24, 1995 +/- 7 days.
They have jurt completed half of the facility and are now starting on the other side.
He discussed the site visit of Messrs. Taylor, Martin and Russell and the mood they projected relative to the restart activities of the utility REVIEW 0F INSPECTION DATES Considerable discussion was held regarding the perceived restart dates for Unit 2 and the projected dates for the Readiness Assessment Team i
Inspection.
It was agreed that, given the uncertainty, we should plan on the inspection taking place on the advertised date of April 10, 1995, recogni $ g that the date was in jeopardy.
We should complete the team 4
selections, develop the scope and details and then put it on hold until the actual dates are known. The team composition and scope details will be prepared by March 24, 1995.
The current composition of the team consists of the following:
Operations Maintenance Enaineerina Mamt/0A Lyon Blumberg Barkley Shediosky Hansel Andersen Sanders Ray Arrighi Erickson The MAP also agreed to maintain the inspection dates for the procurement and NSCP inspections, anticipating the slippage of the RATI outside the critical window.
DISCUSSION OF ' IMPROVING STATION PERFORMANCE" A discussion of the licensee's chart of " Improving Station Performance" was held to determine the critical attributes the MAP felt the licensee should complete before Unit 2 restart.
The licensee owes deliverables from the public MAP meeting to include the Improving Station Performance 9802250183 980220 A
$ E b Y-469
-J h
POR
/
awas
\\
t schedular dates those elements that are integral to the restart of Unit I
2, and the accep,tance criteria the licensee will use to measure progress. Further, they owe us the integrated punchlist for Unit 2 restart.
A discussion developed concerning the need for a meeting with the licensee once the foregoing deliverables are provided.
The panel decided that once the deliverables are received from the licensee, we should review the material and decide if a meeting is warranted or not for further clarification of the items.
The panel noted that further guidance would likely come from the senior managers meeting with the Board of Trustees.
UNIT 2 RESTART PLAN The Unit 2 Restart Plan was provided to the MAP members.
The panel noted that none of the " soft' personnel issues from the Improving Station Performance were included in the list of items for completion before restart.
STATU5 0F MC 0350 The status of MC 0350 was discussed by L. Nicholson. The division of responsibility for completion of items remains to be done.
L. Nicholson and J. Jacobson will evaluate the list and determine which items the RATI will address, which items the resident inspection staff will perform and what items additional resources will be needed to complete, i
L
Sr IMP AGENDA I
MllRCH 17, 1995 PLANT STATUS AND UPDATE ON EVENTS (RESIDENTS)
REVIEW INSPECTION DATES (DURR) e GIVEN THE CURRENT LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE, IS THE RATI DATE APPROPRIATE 7
- IS THE NSCP INSPECTION l.PPROPRIATE7
- IS THE PROCUREMENT INSPECTION APPROPRIATE 7
- STATUS UPDATE ON RAT!, SCOPE, TEAM COMPOSITION, ETC. (JACOBSON)
NRC EXPECT /.TIONS ON " IMPROVING STATION PERFORMANCE" SOFT ISSUES (OURR) e SEE ATTACHMENT !
e DISCUSSION / COMENTS COMM:NTS ON UNIT 2 RESTART PLAN (ALL)
STATUS OF MC 0350 (NICHOLSON)
NEED AND TIMING FOR LICENSEE / KAP MEETING TO DISCUSS DETAILS OF PLANS (ALL)
(
3 yG
,, )
(bo/
I;.
ATTACHMENT I I
IMPROVING STATION PERFORMANCE EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATIONS e DEVELOP VISION 1
i e SITE NEWSPAPER e ASSESS CURREi(T INFORMATION LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT e INTERVIEW ora 4NIZATION DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT e REVIEW MARC PROGRAM EFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE ACTION e ESTABLISH EVENT REVIEW TEAM IDENTIFY R00I CAUSE TREND ROOT CAUSE e ACR PROCEOURES DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENT ACTION ITEM TRACKING IMPROVE ROOT CAUSE PILOT ACR PROCEDURE AT MP3 A
IMPLEMENT ACR PROCEDURE UNIT 1,2,3 e ESTABLISH EVENT REVIEW TEAM
- WHY TWO? SEE ABOVE DEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM PROCEDUp" DEVELOPMENT & USE e '; SIGN ACPs TO RESPONSIBLE LINE MANAGERS e LATEST EVENTS ASSEMBLE CAUSAL FACTORS COMMUNICATE MANAGEMENT EXPECTATIONS FOR & USE OF PROCEDURES WORK PLANNING e ASSIGN A KEY MANAGER AT UNIT 2 e ASSIGN WORK PLANNING REVIEW TEAM ON LINE MAINTENANCE MINOR MAINTENANCE TAGGING ISSUES OPERATI.QG e DEVELOP OPERATION 3URDEN PROCEDURES
(
DEVELOP LIST OF OPERATIONS BURDEN INITIATIVES
?
EVALUATE OPERATIONS BURDEN LIST l
e REVIEW OF EVENTS VERIFY SS LEVEL Of KNOWLEDGE I
_