ML20203C306

Forwards Info Documenting Telcon Between NRC Staff & Ies Utilities,Inc Re Conversion from Current to Improved TS at Daec.Requests Info Be Placed on Docket

ML20203C306
Person / Time
Site:	Duane Arnold
Issue date:	12/05/1997
From:	Kelly G NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9712150276
Download: ML20203C306 (4)

Text

_ ._

December 5, 1997 hiEh10RANDUh1 TO: Information and Records hianagement 11 ranch Omce ofInformation Resources hianagement FROhi: Glenn 11. Kelly. Senior Project hianager Project Directorate 3 3, DRPW, NRR SUllJECT: INFORhtATION 10 llE PLACED ON Tile DUANE ARNOLD ENEROY CENTER (DAEC) DOCKET (50-331)

The enclosed information documents a teleconference between the NRC staff and IES Utilities Inc. regarding discussions about the conversion from current to improved Technical Specifications at DAEC. Please place the enclosed information on the DAEC docket.

Enclosure:

as stated Docket Nos. 50-331 cc: See next page OlSTRIBUTlQB:

Docket File PUBLIC G. Grant, DRP, Rlli EAdensam (EGA1)

PD3-3 RF R. Savio G. Kelly ACRS OGC E. Tomlinson R. Tjader DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DUANEARN\97197COf).WPD te r.c v. . emy s ini. om m.ni wo!. in m. w= c cm .m .nenane e.#. r cm .im enachmentenchwe N e No cq l OFFICE PM PD33 . .E LA PD33 ff E TSB ff] E NAME GKelly\ / ETd n n ,

DATE 12/04 /97 1 /97 12/(d97

/ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY t

'j g. , ,. 7 3 *

• p"' TCid g,;%ew"*

9712150276 97120S PDR ADOCK 05000331 P PDR

.IL,li ,lil.l!I.L .ill.1.1

jacteuq g* t UNITE 3 STATES g j NUCLEAR REQULATORY COMMISSION c, 'f WASHINGTON, D.C. 30MHo01

c. ,

/

December 5, 1997

. h1EMORANDUhi TO: Information and Records hiar.agement liranch

, Office ofinformation Resources hinnagement 1 i

/

FROM: Glenn II. Kelly, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 3 3, DRPW, NRR

)J

. Art /

SUlijECT: INFORMATION To llE PLACED ON Tile DUANE ARNOLD ENEROY CENTER (DAEC) DOCKET (50-331)

The enclosed infonnatien documents a teleconference between the NRC staff and IES Utilities Inc. regarding discussions about the conversion from current to improved Technical Specifications at DAEC. I' lease place the enclosed information on the DAEC docket. ,

i

f b

l i

Enclosure:

as stated Docket Nos. 50-331 cc: See next page i

hiinulci DAEC NitC ITS Conference Call December 3,1997 Time: 1:15 CST Attendees- DAEC Tim Allen (Operations) Je!T hiahannah (System Eng.)

Tony llrowning (Licensing) Tim Erger (System Eng.)

Ken Putnam (Licensing) Itob Anderson (Outage Mgmt.)

Steve llaller (System Eng.) Joel Easton (Procedures)

NRC Glenn Kelly (DAEC PM)

Ed Tomlinson (TSil)

Iloh Tjader(TSil) llob Tjader discussed the purpose of the meetings: this will be the nrst of several conference calls to be held Mondays Wednesdays and Fridays to resolve open questions on sections 3.3, 3.6, and 3.8 of the DAEC ITS submittal. The calls are being held to clarify and answer RAI questions on the submittal. The Ibrmat will be to clarify the questions and if a resolution can be reached in a timely manner it will be resolved during the call, if the resolution is not forthcoming during the call, the question and need for additional information will be agreed upon and then a follow up will be presented at the next conference call.

Discussion then ensued on the section 3.8 ItAls with the resolutions as follows (its is noted that written iesponses have already been submitted by the DAEC for the following NRC questions md that the discussion held was to obtain additional clarincation and resolutions):

CTS 3.8.1.1 No further actions needed, question will be closed upon receipt of an acceptable ITS revision.

CTS 3.8.1.2 NRC was concerned about how the Completion Time for LCO 3.8.1 Required Action A.2 was translated from the CTS into the ITS lbmiat. Specincally, the translation of the CTS Cold Condition to the ITS Modes 3 and 4. NRC questioned why the NOTE located in LCO 3.8.1 just prior to Required Action A.2 was not located in the LCO section. NRC will discuss this prior to the next meeting.

DAEC will Gnd other examples of where this is used in the ITS. These are follow-up items for the Friday conference call.

CTS 3.8.1.3 DAEC explained that the equipment which would be declared inoperable would be dependent upon the failure mcde of the Time Delay relay, NRC will review this and discuss on Friday. Follow-up item for Friday.

Enclosure f

_, m . . . _ - , _ . . - - . . --

2 CTS 3.8.1.4 NRC requested that DAEC cither explain why it is acceptable to remove the requirement that all Low Pressure ECCS Systems be operable with two offsite sources inoperable or show where this CTS requirement has been put into ITS.

Follow up item for Friday.

CTS 3.8.1.f No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.1.6 No funher actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.1.7 No further actions reeded, question closed.

CTS 3.8.1.8 No further actions needed, question closed. ,

CTS 3.8.1.9 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.1.10 NRC discussed the requirement by NRC Offlee of General Counsel to change DOC A4 to an L Doc. DAEC agreed to change the A3 doc to an 1 doc.

CTS 3.8.1.11 NRC discussed the STS requirement to keep diesel testinc between 90% and 100% of continuous duty rating. DAEC will review. Follow up item for Friday.

CTS 3.8.1.12 No further actions needed, question will be closed upon receipt ofITS revision.

CTS 3.8.1.13 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.1.14 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.2.1 NRC questior.ed where the CTS Core Spray, RilR, and Diesel operability requirements during OPDRVs are now located in ITS. DAEC will review and discuss on Friday. Follow up item for Friday.

CTS 3.8.3.1 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.4.1 NRC discussed the removal of 24 VDC from ITS. This item will be discussed at ,

the December 17 meeting in Washington D.C.

CTS 3.8.4.2 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.4.3 NRC discussed the removal of 24 VDC from ITS. This item will be discussed at the December 17 meeting in Washington D.C.

CTS 3.8.4.4 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.4.5 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.4.6 No further actions needed, question closed.

CTS 3.8.4.7 NRC discussed the change in battery discharge testing requirements. NRC will discuss the issue internally and discuss on Friday. Follow-up item for Friday.

CTS = current technical specifications STS = standard technical specifications The next conference call was set for Friday 12/5/97 at 1315 hrs CST.

. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _.