ML20199J856
| ML20199J856 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/1998 |
| From: | Schopfer D SARGENT & LUNDY, INC. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 9583-100, NUDOCS 9802060052 | |
| Download: ML20199J856 (36) | |
Text
W..
i y
Sar ger(itr d!h t_ undy
- j t
h;7 Don K. Schopfst
'/
Senior Vice President 312 269-6078 Febmary 3,1998 Project No. 9583-100 Docket No. 50-423 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3 Independent Corrective Action Verification Program United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Docutaent Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 I have enclosed the following eleven (11) discrepancy reports (DRs) identified during our review activities for the ICAVP. These DRs are being distributed in accordance with the Communications Protocol, PI-MP3-01, t
DR No. DR-MP3-0888 DR No. DR-MP3-0998 DR No. DR-MP3-0960 DR No. DR-MP3-0999 DR No. DR-MP3-0978 DR No. DR-MP3-1003 DR No. DR-MP3-0987 DR No. DR-MP3-1004 DR No. DR-MP3-0995 DR No. DR-MP3-1006 DR No. DR-MP3-1008 I have also enclosed the following nine (9) DRs for which the NU resolutions have been reviewed and accepted by S&L.
DR No. DR-MP3-0193 DR No. DR-MP3-0:24 DR No. DR-MP3-0214 DR No. DR-MP3-0336 I
DR No. DR-MP3-0233 DR No. DR-MP3-0346 I
DR No. DR-MP3-0270 DR No. DR-MP3-0508 DR No. DR-MP3-0755 9802060052 900203
~
DR ADOCK 03000423 PDR 55 East Monroe Street
- Chicago. IL 60603-5780 USA + 312-269-2000
i w
' United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 31998 Docurnent Control Desk Project No. 9583-100 Page 2 Please direct any questions to me at (312) 269-6078.
Yours very truly,
^
~
D. K. chopfer Senior Vice President and ICAVP Manager DKS:spr Enclosures Copies:
E. Imbro (1/l) Deputy Director, ICAVP_ Oversight T. Concannon (1/l) Nuclear Energy Advisory Council J. Fougere (1/1) NU miavpkwr\\98WO203 aduc i
il h
___J
Northeast Utilitie,s ICAVP DR No. DR4P34193 Millstorm Unit 3 Discrepancy Report MrNiew Otoup: Programmehc DM RE808.UT1oN ACCEPTED P.wira Element: Correcthe Acton Process O Yes C-Ep Type: correme Neon g) systemeroceee: N/A NRC Mntauence invol: 3 Date faxed to NO:
Date Putdished: 10/1o97 Discrepancy; NCR 393-035 Tripped accelerometer on fuel shipping container.
Desertpehm: The procedure in effed at the time this NCH was written was NEO 3.05, Rev. 2, dated 3/1/92. According to NEO 3.05, Section i
6, 'Instrudions,' Paragraph 6.1 *NCR Origination" Subporegraph l
6.1.1 sU.les "In the field, deficiencies are identifisd by trouble reports, automated work orders, PIRs surveillances, inspedions, and audits." Additionally, Subparagraph 6.1.2 states 'If the NCR l
Is utilized for problems associated with servicos or progre *ss, the l
dispostion should in1ude corrective adlon in accordano, with l
NEO 2.18, ' Corrective Adion Request,' when appropriate, in addition,10 CFR part 71.5 Paragraph (a)(1)(vi) requires l
' Hazardous materisi employee training 49 CFR part 172:
Subpart H.' 49 CFR part '172.7A4 " Training requirements' Paragraph (a)(3)?,i) requires " Methods and procedures for avoiding accidents, such as the proper procedures for handling packages containing hazardous materials ' Since the problem occurred in the field while removing the fuel bundle from the shipping container and there was the potential to have damaged the fuei cis.dding which potentially could affed plant safety or tb.e ability of the plant equipment to operate property, this issue should have been dispositioned under the Problem identification Report (PIR) or Corrective Adion Roquest (NEO 2.18) process.
iteview i
venid invalid Needed Date initiator: Dombroweid. Am 8
O O
vlSS7 VTtsed: Ryan. Thames J O
O O
waner VT Mgr: Schoper. Don K O
O O
MAS 7 inc chmn: Sm Anand K O
O O_
10/4S7 Dei.:
INVAUD:
Date: 1/26/98 RESOLUTION: NU has concluded that the issue reported in DR MP3-0193 does not represent a discrepatit condition.The following provides a synopsis of the fuel unloading indicating the actions taken. On March 18,1993 a fuel assembly shipping container with 2 fuel assemblies was being unpacked pungprocedure EN 31026 Rev
- 0. Training in the use of this procedure had been conducted with all personnel involved. Following EN 31026, the acct.lerometeis were initially verified as intact, t.ater, during the unloading operation when the lock tubes were being set up, the machanics shook the shipping container and tripped one of the accelerometers.EN 31026 paragraph 4.3.17 states that if an accelerometer is found tripped, the following actions shall be 14en; 1) notify the Wt Ainghouse representative,2) perform an irepection per Westinghouse procedure F-4, and 3) to write an Printed 2/39e 10-18.43 AM Pope 1 of 2
l Nwtheast UE.es ICAVP DR h DR dP84188 l
umstan unit 3 Discrepancy Report NCR. These actions were performed. No PIR or Corrective AC,on Pequest was written.In order to respond to the issues identiflod in DRMP3-0193, additional clattfloation is provided below, of the actions taken by NU during this event. Training was conducted on EN 31028 and the procedure was followed.
Automated Wort 6 Order (AWO) MS 93-04694 identiflod the deflaiency, an NCR was wrteten and the inspection was performed. These actions are in socordance wMh NEO 3.05 rm NCR's. The quotation used in this DR from NEO 3.05 is correct, but it is not complete. NEO 3.05 continues to state that in the fleid, an NCR is not used to identify deflaiencies but to provide en0ineering direction. NEO 3.06 eleo st:tes that deflaiencies are identified by several possible vehwies including an AWO, which was done. NEO 2.18 for corrective actions states that a CAR is used when no procedure exists to correct the problem in this case a procedure did exist as the EN directed the field to inspect the fuel assemblies using Attachment 3 to Westinghouse xocedure F-4 and write an NCR. The threshold for wetting a PIR n this case was dependent on the oute:,me of the F 4 inspection.
No damage was found and therefore no PIR was required. in summary, procedures existed to cover the adions taken and they were appropriately followed. Significance Level crtteria do not soply here as this is not a discrepent condMion.
NU has conclMed that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DRMP3 0193, does not represent a discrepent condRion.
Procedures were in place, training was provided and appropriate actions taken in response to the event. 86 nificanos Level.
0 ortleria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Prowounty.esemned by Nu? Q Yes @ No NonOleerepentCenebenF@ Yes V No nenehmenPonenerO v.
@ No nosehmenunroemedtO va @ Ne modew
%gg Assepable Not Asseptable Needed Dele O
O O-om vit.and: Ryan, Thor.i.J VT Mm schopfer. Den K inc chmn: sineh. Anand K Q
O iirries cono:
-1/26/98 sL conenente: The procedure is r.ut clear on the resolution of condnions inat ooour in the field. While the disposition to the NCR was technically adequate, the procedure ir9 plied that since this was a fleid problem it should have been reported under the NCR process and dispositioned to a PIR. Since ther condition was adequately resolved and did not result in any technical problems, and the question fo0 anting li,1plementation d a PIR is the result of subjodive interpretation of th9 procedurs's interrt, this DR's
<16srosition concoming a non discrepant condition is accepted.
Prwed 2/ses 10:1s e Au Pese 2 or 2 i
l I
l
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR4P34214 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtew Group: Eralem DR RE3oLUTioN ACCEPTED Review ElemerW: System Deegt)
Dioce,A6ne: I & C Dee9n O vee W,
- p Type
- Drewvg g
syenemeronen: oss NRC Signmcence love : 4 Does faxed to N'J:
Date Pubilebod: 1W3W97 08acteeency: Drawing Discrepancy. Rhematic 3QSS 060 r=.^ - : Jumper between terminals "C65* and "C65" of TB14 In Annunciator Logic Cabinet 3lHA ANNM82 not shown; jumper shown on Wiring Diagram EE-4R, Rev 5.
Review Valld leveled Needed Date initiator: Pinelse, H.
Q Q
1 WIN 97 VT Law: Nort. Anthony A O
Q Q
1W1@97 VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K Q
Q Q
1W2097 inc chmn: Singh. Anand K Q
Q Q
1W27/97 Dei.:
INVAUO:
Date: 1/24/98 RESOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0214, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. This discrepancy report identifies a missing jumper between terminals TB14 C65 & C65 (common 125VDC power) in 3lHA ANNMB2 on Test Loop Diagram (TLD) 3QSS-060. This drawing deficiency was reviewed and found to be valid. The annunciator logic cabinet drawing EE-4R reflects this jumper as a common 125VDC power connection on the manufacturer's side of the terminal block. TLD 3QSS-060 has to be revised to add a jumper between terminals TB14 C65 & C65 in 31HA-ANNM82 to agree with drawing EE-4R. Conoition i
Report (Crt) M3-97 3803 was written to provide necessary l
corrective actions to resolve this issue. Approved Corrective l
Action Plan (CAP) (attachod) and DCN DM3-00-1816-97 were I
issued to correct the design drawing discrepancies. No work is required in the field.
==
Conclusion:==
NU has concluded ' hat Discrepancy Report. DR MP3-0214, has identified a cor dition not previous!y discovered by NU.
Condition Report (CR) M3-97 3803 was wdtttn to provide l
necessary corrective actions to resolyr' this issue. Approved Corrective Action Plan (CAP) (attached) and DCN DM3-00-1816-97 were issued to correct the design drawing diwrepancies. No work is required in the field.
Previously identmed by NU7 O Yes @#) No NonDiscrepentcondit6on?U Yes @ No Printed 2/39e 10.17.15 AM Pope 1 or 2
Northeast Utlaties ICAVP m m mes4:14 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepency Report l
Reechse6en Pending?U Yes
'5s No ReechsthmunreseevedFU Yes (9) No Rev6ew init6aler: Pinetes, H.
O O
O m*
VT Last Nort, //chony A O
O O
(m VT Mgr 8,1hapser. Den K WO Chmn: $4rgh, Anand K Date:
SL Conenente:
Prtnied 2/34610.17.20 AM -
Page 2 of 2 l
Northeast Utiitties ICAVP DR No. DR MP34233 ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group; system OR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: system Design g
Diecipane: 1 & C Deeg" Om E
y Type: Droeg
@ No s, _.
sWP NRC signiacance level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdlehed: 10/3047 r
Ei Draw 6ng Discrepancy. LSK 9100,K Deecrepleen: Control Actions "3SWP*MOV102A Open/ Auto" on LSK 910K and "3SWP*MOV102B Open/ Auto' on LSK 9100 should be depicted as two separate Control Ac3ons; one for Open and one for Auto to prov6de the capability for opening MOV102A and MOV102B manually or automatically to agree with the P&lD.
Monitar designation between Source and Condition for 3SWP*MOV102A on LSK 910K should be changed from 'A' tt
'S' at MB5R. The monitor designation 'A' is shown twice.
Note 1 on LSK 9-100 references *LSK 910J (28193 Sh 9)"
rather than "LSK 910K (28193 Sh 10)".
Review vand invand Needed Date Inatlator: Ptnotes, H.
O O
O 10r1787 Vf Leed: Nort. Arshany A O
O O
$0/ 787 YT Mgri schopfer, Don K Q
Q Q
10/2o97 1RC Chne: Singh, Anand K Q
Q Q
107747 Date:
INVAUD:
Dese: 1/22/98 RESOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that items #2 & #3 cf Discrepancy Report DR-MP3-0233 have identified conditions not previcusly discovered by NU which require correction. Condition Repos (CR) M3 3842 has been written to provide the necessary corrective actions to resolve these issues. The approved Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for M3 97 3842 is attached, o
Revise the letter in the alarm monitor symbol adjacent to MB5R from A to S on LSK 910K to agree with ESK 10KR.
o Revise the lo0lc diagram referenced in note one on LSK 9-10C from LSK 9-10J (28193 sh. 9) to LSK 910K (28193 sh.10) for 3SWP'MOV102A & 3SWP*MOV102C.
These drawing errors have been corrected via Design Change Notice (DCN) DM3-001803-97; no additional werk is required in the field.
NU has concluded that the issue of item #1 reported in Discrepancy Report DRNP3-0233 does not represent a discrepent condition.
Prtnted 2/T9610:17.40 AM Page i of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR4PW33 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report The control adion depicted as PB 3SWP*MOV102A Open/ Auto (rimilar for P8-3SWP*MOV102C) on LSK 910K and PB-SSW*MOV1028 Open/ Auto (similar for PB 3SWP*MOV1020) on LSK 9-100 indicates these valves can be opened manually by the pushbutton or automatically by their reapedive SWP pump running. The Remote / Isolate switch at the Fire Transfer Switch Panel Inust be in the REMOTE position for 3SV"MOV102A & 3SWP*MOV102C for this to occur. Since there is only one adlon on this pushbutton as shown on ESK 3K, detail BQ9, it would be incorred to represent this action in two places on the logic diagrams as suggested by this DR. Also, PalD EM 133A correctly details the func/lonal information for all four valves mentioned. Therefore no change is required by this item.
Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a (tiscrepant condition.
==
Conclusion:==
NU has concluded that items #2 & #3 of Discrepancy Report DR.
MP3-0233 have identified conditions not previously discovered by NU which require corredion. Condition Report (CR) M3-97 3842 has been written to provide the necessary corrective adions to resolve the7e documentation issues. The drawing errors have been correded via Design Change Notice (DCN)
DM3-001803 97.
NU has concluded that the issue of hem #1 reported in Discrepancy Report DR MP3 0233 does not represent a discrepant condition.
The control actions riepided on LSK 910C, LSK 9-10K and EM.
133A correctly detail the hardware and functio 1al information for these Service Water MOVs 3SWP*102A. C and 3SWP'MOV1028, D with the Fire Transfer Switch Panel Remotellsolate switch in remote position. Therefore, this is not a discrepant condition.
Significance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a discrepent condition.
Previously klontined try Nui U vos @ No NonMCondition?Q vos @ No Pman Pending70 vee @ No Resolution Unresolved?O vee @ No Review insistor: Pinsies, H,
~~
8 O
O
=
VT Lamt: Nort, Archony A VT Mgr: Schosh, Don K 1RC Chmn: Singh. Anand K O
Date:
sL Conenente:
Printed ?O9e 1o.17.53 AM Pe(C of 2
Northea-J Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP34270 Milietone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Gtoups system DR REsoLUTloN ACCEPTED Review Enemme symm Dnien
,,,,,,,o,,,,,,,,,
D6eenpane: stnecturei Demon O va r% ay Type: ceiculataan
@ No syenenwProcese: sWP NRC TJmr level: 4 Dele faxed to Nu:
DatePubashed: 10/109T Descrepancy: Pipe Support Calculation Discrepancy Dacripe on: We have reviewi Pipe Support Calculation no. NP(F)-ZO19R.
766 H001,Rev.6, Dated 4/20/93.
Based upon the results of that review we have noted the following discrepancy:
On pa9e 12,the maximum normal stress should be 19,514 psi (not 18,140 psi).
Review Valid invalid Needed Date initietor: Kleie, N O
O O
'"$857 YT Leed: Nwt, Anthony A O
O O
ir23,97 VT Mgr; Schople, Don K Q
Q Q
SOQ97 IRC chmn: Sanch, A,wwi K O
O O
102S7 Date:
INVALID:
Dele: 1/23/98 REsoLUTloN: Disposi'.lon:
Nu has concluded that the itsue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3 0270, does not rep,esent a cscrepant conditloa. The maximum normal stress of 1W,514 psi that you refer to is for
- DUMk,Y MEMBER
- number 1 (see page 11 of calculation).
This fictitious member which is modeled as a short piece of 3 X 3 tube steel, connects the center of the number 2 member (TS 3 x 3 x 0.25) to the base plate to facilitate the transfer of the load from the real number 2 member to the rest base plate. The maximum normal stress for support steel is found in member number 3 to equal 18,139.809 psi rounded up to 18,140 psl as delineated in the support calculation.
Previously identined tpy Nu? O Yee
- 19) No Non Dio:repwACondethn?(Gi vie O No Resolw.m Pend 6ng?O vos + No Reso.uiioaunresoevedtO see r*D No Review Inlustor: Kleic, N VT Leed: Nort, Anthony A O
O O
VT Mgr: sch pfw, Doa K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anend K D*:
1/23/98 sL commente: The NU resolution is accepted for this specific henger.
Because the hanger is cantilevered off the 1.5"long fictitloous 3x3 tube steel member, the analysis results are not affected by the relatively low moment of inertia of the fictitious member used Printed 2/39610 N 23 AM Page 1 of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP M No, MMP3 Jim l
Millstone Unit 3 Discropancy Report l
in the analysis. However, in general, the recommended predice is to use a fictRious member that has a large moment of inertla relative to the real member conneded to it.This !s to ersure that the fictitious member is sufficiently rigidity so that the computed defiedions and member stresses are not influenced by the stiffness of the fidNious member,The modeling of fidnious members with relatively small moment of inertia may underestimate stroes in the real members and may resuN in inaccurate defloded shape.
.4 yJ
_=
Printed 2/19610:18.27 AM Pa'ge 2 of 2 l
Northeast Utilkies ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0324 Millstone unM 3 Discrepancy Report Revtsw Group: speem DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Rev6ow Element: system Destyi y
Diesipinne: h Design O vee N
li Type: Componard Oste gg s, _..
Rss NRC pJalacence level: 3 Date faxed to W:
Dele Publ6shed: 1/17/98
~
h
-ii inconsistendes w/ FSAR Sec 6.3.2.2.5; ECCS gate & globe vivs stated to have lantem ring leakoff.
E=. ~ ~ ~ FSAR Section 6.3.2.2.5 requires all emergen:y core cooling system gate valves to have stem leskoff connedions at the lantem ring. The FSAR sodion also states that control and motor operated valves exposed to recirculation flow have double-packed stuffing boxes and stem leakoff connedions to the reactor plant gaseous drain system. Containmen'. recirculation system components are described h. FSAR Section 6.3 to be induded in the emorgency core coooling system.
- 1. Gate valve desyn spedfication 2282.050476 through Revision 1 shows valves 3RSS*MOV38A.B not to have stem leakoff connections. However, drawing 2282.050-676110 Revision E shows the valves to have lantem ring stem leakoff connections. Pecking within the stuf'ing box is not addressed in specification 2281.050-676 or drawing 2282.050-676110.
- 2. Valvo design specification 2282.050-676 through Revision 1 shows gate valves 3RSS*MOV8837A,B and 3RSS*MOV8838A,B not to have lantem ring leakoff connections. However drawing 2282.050-676103 Revision i shows valves 3RSS*MOV8837A,8 and 3RSS*MOV8838A,B to have stem leakoff connections. Facking within the stuffing box is not addressed in specification 2282.050-676 or drawing 2282.050-676 106,
- 3. Valve design spedfications 2282.050153 through Revision o and 2282.150154 through Revision 2 show the folWW containment recirculation manual gate valves m to have stem leakoff connections.
This is also suostantiated by the respective valve drawings.
Gate and globe valve drawing references supplementing specifications 2282.050153 and 2282.150154 are as follows:
2282.150154 0tS r,.. C 2282.150-154-019 Rev G 2282.150-154-021 Rev G 2282.150154-022 Rev K 2282.150154-026 Rev G 2282.150154-042 Rev G 2282.150154-043 Rev G 97A71%fLiu rMa hv ft PrWed 2/3/9810.18 51 AM Page 1 of 2
,mm~me-ilortheast utsties ICAVP DR N' DR MP84884 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report 2282.150154-046 Rev G 2282.050153-04; Rev A 2282.050153-039 Rev B l
(NOTE: this drawing shows a leakoff connodion on the valve)
Rev6ew VeW Invalid Needed Dele inmaston FWngood.D.1 O
O O
$ t'$ 'I87 YT Leed: Nwl, Anthony A Q
Q O
12/17/97 VT Mer: Schopfw, Don K O
O O
$20S7 iRc ch-n: Singn, Ansad K O
O O
1"
- Dese:
WVALlo:
Date: 1/28/98 RESOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that DR MP3-0324 identifies a condition previously discovered by NU which has been corrected.FSARCR 97 MP3 563 ( See Attachment ) which has been approved but is awaiting iwuance corrods the discrepancies between the FSAR and the Vendor Specifications and Drawin0s detailed in this DR. Copies of the revelent annotated FSAR pa0es are attached.This issue was previously identified by UIR 2588, dated 5/31/97 ( See Attachments ).
==
Conclusion:==
NU has concluded that DR MP3-0324 Identifies a condition previously discovered by NU which has been corrected.
FSARCR 97 MP3-563 ( See Attachment ) which has been approved but is awaiting issuance corrects the discrepancies between the FSAR and the Vendor Specifications and Drawings detailed in this DR. Copies of the revelent annotated FSAR paces are attached.This issue was previously identified by UIR 2588, dated 5/31/97 ( See Attachments ),
Previously identifled by Nu?
- > Yes Q No Nor Discrepent Condelion?Q Yes
@ No Resolut6on Pend 6ng?O vos i No Resoeuiion une.sw.stO Y=
+ No Review initleton Feingold, D. J.
~
VT Locd: Nort, Anthony A VT Mgr: Sdepter, Don K b
1RC Chmn: Singn, Anand K O
Dele:
SL Comnente:
Printed 2/M610.18 55 AM Pege 2 of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0334 Ministone unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtow Group: system DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Revtow timment: system Daign n,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
O vos r _ guy Type: Ch%
@ No systenvProcase: 'Jss NRC signecem levet: 4 Date FAAed to NU:
DatePutdlehed: 10/tM7 E.
Pipe Support Calculation Discrepancy f**arePuon: We have reviewed Pipe Support Calculation no NP(F) Z079R-753-H003,Rev,1.
Based upori tra results of this review,the following discrepancy has t:een noted:
Local stresses in the in-place steel beam at the pipe support attachment location have not been addressed in the analysis. Local stress check is required per Desig t Criteria Document NETM-27,Rev.1, Review vand invalid Needed Date inaw.or: Klone, N O
O O
waar VT Lee,1: Nort, Anthony A O
O O
' 3'17 VT ugra schopfer Don K Q
Q Q
10/1597 1RC Chmn: singh, Armd K O
O O
50/1'51 D*:
Irf4 Allo:
De**:
1/22/96 Resolution: Cisposition:
NU has concluded that DR MP3-0336 does not represent a discrepant condition. Pipe support calculation NP(F) 079R 753 H003,Rev.1 is a part of E&DCR F-J-23981 which refere ices Structural Calculation 12179 SEO S50.50 ( See Attachment ).
Structural Chiculation 12179-SEO-S50.50 performs the local stress check of the subject structural beam for attachment H003 as detailed in the E&DCR This saHsfies the requirements of NETM 27, Rev.1,Signifierce lave Orlierta do not apply as this is not a discrepant condkon.
Previously identmed by Nu? O Yee
'#) No Non D6screpint('.ondetion?f Yee O No ResolutionPending?O vu + No RndutionUnrudved?O va @ No Review inttnetort 60eie, N O
ma VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A VT u r: schopr,r, Don K e
b IRc Chmn: $ @,Anand "
O Dee*:
1/22/98 st Cornnents: S&l. Response:
We ag:
<,tth Nu's response.However, since calculation no.
NP(F) 2079R 753-H003,Rev.1 does not provide any reference to Print 6d 2/19e 10.19 21 AM Pope UIT
NoMMad 'JtWtles ICAVP DR No. DR4AP3-0334 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report E&DCR F4-23981,we recommend adding this reference to calculCbn NP(F)-2079R 753-H003,Rev.1 in order to provide a link',o all documents relevant to the qualification of the support and the evaluation of the existing strudure(s).
l Pnneed 239610:19.26 AM Pa0e 2 of 2 l
Northeast Utilities lGAhp DR No. DR MP34344 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
' neview oroup: symem On nesowTioN ACCEPTED noveew tiement: system Design Diecipane: Mew Dagn O va Diecroponey Type: Componert Dets gg 2
s_...-
m oss NRC signancence loved: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdiohed: 1W2H7 Discrepancy: FSAR Table 6.245 is inconsistent w/ 3DBS-NSS-002 for closure time of valves SQSS*MOV34A,B.
P=,
' FSAR Table 6.2-65 Sheet 7 shows a required closure time for containment isolation valves 3QSS*MOV34A and 30SS*MOV348 of less than 30 seconds. Design Basis Summary Document (DBSD) 3DBS-NSS-002 Revision 0, Sedion 12.5.1.3, shows a required closure time for the same valve of less than or equal to 40 seconds. These values are inconsistent with each other, However, both the FSAR dnd DBSD requirements are satisfied by the design specification for i
the valves,2362.200164 through Addendum 1 which shows a field adjustable closure time of approximately 30 seconds.
Review Valid invalid Needed Date initiator: Feingold, D. J.
O O
O 15157 VT t med: tJwl, Anthony A O
O O
$5157 VT Mgri Schopier, Don K O
O O
155a7 stC chmn: singh. Anand K O
O O
555 " 7 Date:
INVAUD:
)
Date:
2/2/98 Resolution Disposition:
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0346, has identified e condition previously discovered by NU which ieqeires corredion. The discrepancy was discovered as part of the 50.54 FSAR verification. FSARCR 97 MP3-403 (Attached) was issued for the correction to Table 6.2 65.
==
Conclusion:==
NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0346, hab identified a condition previously discovered by NU which requires corredion. The discrepancy was discovered durlag FSAR Chapter 6 verification and a change was initiated for its corredion.
Previously identined by NU7 @ vee O No Non E
,_mCond 6 f D vee + No Resolution Pending?O vos @ No Resolution Untosolved?O ve.
@ No Review e:7 ': Not Acceptabie W Date F
, D. J.
VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A Printed 2fMe 1o.19 52 AM Pane 1 of 2
Northeast UtilRies ICAVP DR %. DRMP3-0344 Millstone unn 3 Discrepancy Report f
O
=
VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K O
m Il4C Chmn: Singh, Anand K O
O O
Dnie:
SL Commente:
4
(
B Printed 2/39610.19 *$ AM Pe 2 W 2 A
t Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0608 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Rev6ew Group: System DR RESOLUTION ACCEPTED Review Element: Modrhoe%n Dveagn Diec W : Mechan 6 cal Doeg" O Ya D'-:4
- p Type: Instehehon Requremente gg SysterWProcoes: Oss NRC SW ::-nlevet: 4 Data faked to NU:
Date Putdished: 1/1098 D6ecropency: Discrepancy with resped to PDCR MP3-90106, 3QSS*AOV27/28 Engaging Key Removal.
Dacript6an: The afMded vendor manual or equivalent is not revised by the desigre change document, it appears that a page of the vendor manu61 is modiflw by the design change as shown in the design document. However, no change to the vendor manualis specified by the design document.
Review Valid invalid Needed Ude inatiator: Feingood. D. J.
'O O
O
- -ids 7 VT Lead: Neri. Anthony A O
O O
$2/is97 viMer: Schopfer. Don K Q
Q Q
12/2397 IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K Q
Q Q
12/31/97 Date:
INVAUD-Cate:
2/2/98 REtOLUTION: Disposition:
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0508, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requirer, correction. A change to O & M Manual 01M 1851C, Butterfly Valves, shall be initiated per section 1.5 of DC 16, to incorporate the changes from PDCR MP3 90106 technical manual page. CorTective action plan for CR M3 98-0301 has been approved to correct this ommission post startup. The Significance Level is concluded to be Level 4 since there is no impact on DB or LB analyses er plant equipment.
==
Conclusion:==
NU has concluded that Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0508, has identified a condition not previously discovered by NU which requires correction. The technical manual will be revised after startup. CR M3 98-0301 will track this discrepancy. The Significance levM is concluded to be Level 4 since there is no impact on DB or LB analyses or p' ant equipment.
Prov6ously identiflod by NU? O Yes ? No Non Discrepent Condition?Q Yes
'91 No Resolut6on Ponding?O Yes # No ResolutionUnresolved?O Yes @ No Review initiator: Feingood. D. J.
O O
O 229s v,. m m i-i Printed 2/19610.20 26 AM
~
Page 1 of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP34604 Milletone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report l
O g
=
YT Mgrt Schopfw. Don K IltC Chmnt SWgh, Anend K l
I46e:
SL Cannents:
Pnnled 209610.20:30 AM Pp 2 W 2
l Northeast Utiittles ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 4788 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Remw Group: Propemmehc DR REs0LUTioN ACCEPTED ftsv6 tiement: undmoseen Deep D ce: i a C De*"
O Ya N, ny Type: Drowng i No systowPresses: N/A
~
NRC SierWAcence levW* 4 Dele faxed to NU:
Date Putdiehest: 1/1W96
~
06emapency: Unincorporated rev6sions Desertpalen: DDR 608 was incorporated under E & DCR N EC 00336. The
~
followin9 list of affected documents as documented on E & DCR N EC-00336 have not been revised:
- 1. 2424400-427 079 sht. 30
- 2. 2424 600-427 079 sht. 32
- 3. 2424 600-477 079 sht. 33
- 4. 2424-600-427 079 sht. 37
- 5. 2424-600-427 079 sht. 53
- 6. 2424 600-427-009
- 7. 2424 4 00-427 018 8, 2424 4 00-427-020 Review Valid invol6d Needed Date init6 sten Dombrowski,J6m O
O O
$2/12/97 VT Lead: Ryan ThommeJ O
O O
t2/iss7 VT Men Schopler. Den K O
O O
5:'5 57 IRC Chmn: Singh. Anand K Q
Q Q
12/11/97 Dese:
uwAUD:
Date: 1/30/98 RESOLUTION: NU has concluded that the issue reported in Discrepancy Report, DR MP3-0755, does noi represent a discrepant condition.
Desl0n Change Notice DM3 S 1249-95, dated 12/15/95 was written to corTect all of the documentation noted in the E & DCR N-EC-00336. The vendor card file wire list for sequencers 3RPS*PNLESCA & B was Olven one drawing number,25212-
~
39427 sh 79 (2424.600-427 079). The wire list consisted of 54 sheets. The information was combined on two drawings, one retaining drawing number 25212 39427 sh 79 (2424.600-427 079) and the other new drawing number 25212 39427 sh 253 (2424.600 427 253). Card File Wire List sh i drawing 25212-39427 sh 79 (2424.600-427 079) references Card File Wire List SH2 as drawing 25212 39427 sh 253 (2424.600 $27 253). The DCN DM3 S 1249-95 and drawings 25212 39427 sh 79 (2424.600-427 079) and 25212 39427 sh 253 (2424.600-427 253) are attached.
Shnificance Level criteria do not apply here as this is not a dis:repant condition.
Provwuely identefled by NU? U Yes @ No Non D6ecrepa.t Cond6t6on?$ Yes Q No ResolutionPending?O va @ No Ramutionunr=wvedrO va @ No Review Acceptande Not Acceptable Needed Dele g
y O
O O
i m se Pnnled 2G9610:21:10 AM' ' ~ "'""' '"'-'
- Page 1 of 2
Northead Utiinnes ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 4755 Milletone unN 3 Discrepancy Report n.
m,.
O O
O 2aS$
VT Mgr: Schop ar, Don K O
O m
IRC Chmn: Singh /vand K O
Dah:
1/30/96 stC m : Design Change Notice (DCN) DM3 S 1249 95 was written to l
I incorporate the drawing revisions of Engheering & Design Change Request (E & DCR) N EC-00336 and, additionally, revised by combining into two (2) drawings, numbered 25217, 39427 sh 79 and 253, all fifty four (54) stieets under drawing number 2424 600-427 079. The revisions made under E & DCR DM3-S 1249 95 were incorporated into drawings 25212 39427 sh 79 and 253. However, as a followup, since drawings 2424-600-427 079 sh 1 thru 54 no longer exist, NU should verify that all these drawings have been volded/ superseded by the replacement drawings.
Prtreed 2f39610.21:14 AM Page 2 of 2
Northoust Utilities ICAVP DR % DR MPS4898 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report DR VAUD Ri.new aroupt Programmehe Review Element: Change Process Di.=ipmas:i a e Dawn o y, Discrepeney Type: Correowe Acan
@) No systenWProcese: sWP NRC sientheenee level: 4 pas, yAx g g,ngua Date Putdished: 1W96 Deseropency: inadequate Adverse Condition Repori significance level.
E f
Adverse Condition Report (ACR) MS 96-0357 documents an inadequate description in Licensing Event Report (LER) 96-005-000. The original concem, iden;ified by Vertical Slice Review Team item #506, was written to address a design noncompliance created by Bypass Jumper 3 90 20. This ACR was incorredly categortzed as level a *D." The ACR documents that the LER did not report the design basis violation associated with the bypass jumper. Such an omission from an LER warrants a significance les el higher than level *D." This document should be categorized at the same level as the o'iginal problem. A significance classification higher than level'D' would have resulted in a re-review of the entire investigation. This investiga'lon would address the lack of sufficient discussion regarding violation of the plant's design basis documents (DBD) and assessed the completeness of the LER's revision. According to NUREG 1022, errors in an LER must be corrected in a revised report, and this revised report must be a stand alene document. Since the original dispocition determined that the condition crea'ed by Bypass Jumper 3 90 20 was reportet,le, and the resul? Of an inadequate safety evaluation, the subsequent disposition revising the LER should have re-reviewed the original Root Cause Anal, sis and other supplementalinvestigations to determine the adequacy of this revision. Additionally, the ACR's Corrective Action Plan stated that there is additional discussion being added to the causal f actors determination and corrective action; however, this revision is inconsistent with RP 4's requirements for dispositioning level'D' ACRs. Level"D' ACRs do not require a causal factor deteimination.
Review Valid invalid Needed Date initletor: Dombrowstd Jlm O
O O
tr27/96 VT Leed: Ryan. Thomes J B
D D
tr27i96 vi wen schce.r. Don K O
O O
tras<e6 BRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K g
g Q
2i296 Date:
INVAUD:
Date:
REsOLuflON:
Previously identtfled by Nu? O Yes tei No N(nDi gn',CondN60n?Q Yes (Si~No__
Resolut6on Pending?O e
@ No ResolutionUnresolvedtO ves 4)No M-: ; * '- Not M - - '
Needed Date Page i or 2 Printed 2/19610 09.46 AM l
Northeast Utilities ICAVP M No, MMP34666 uniistone unn 3 Discrepancy Report vit w: k g, % ;
O O
O O
O O
vi u,n sc%, con v.
RC Chmn: $@, Arend K sL Conynents:
4 Prwed 2G9610 09 50 AM Py 2 of 2
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR4PSM Mmstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Rev6ew oroup: system DRvAuo Review Element: srenom Desien piecionw: Strum Dawn o y, C:_., my Type: Colo Jishon c,) g eyesenWProcess: Hvx NnC signineena knl: 4 Dane Faxed to NO:
Date Published: 2/H6 DeerePancy: Di*ct Support Calculation Discrepancy Deserweten: We have reviewed the dreupport calculation no.12179-NP(F)-
Z545J 1245, Rev.6, dated 5/8/94.
Based on this review we have noted the following discrepancies, (1) AISC code check is not performed.
i Also on page 16 of this calculation, qualification of the angle Ex4x1/2 with 94' unsupported legth, the value of ta=4.044 ksi & Fa=11.94 ksi Therefore, fa/Fa= 0.34 > 0.1f.
The required interaction of axial amd bending stresses when fa/Fm is > 0.15 is not performed, i
(2) On ps0e 17 of 'his calculation ( Base Plate 'N for strudi Jt. 2
& 3) global forces do not match with strudl output.
(3) On page 21 of this calculation (vield clieck),
local forces are not consistent with strudi output.
Review ven6d invend Needed Oste inatiator: Polel A.
O O
O siaeos VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O
O O
irame VT Mgr: i'r epter, Don K Q
Q Q
1/2W9e IRC Chmn: Singh. Anend K O
O O
ir27/9e DA:
INVAUO:
4 Date:
REsOLUDoN.
Previously idesAthed by Nu? O Yes it) No Non06ecropontCondetion?O Yes @ No Resolut6on Pend 6ng?O va + No RuhtlonUnrnWed?O va @ No Review Acceptable Not Acc@ Needest Date g, g VT Leed: Neri. Anthony A VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K 1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K
=
4 Date:
st Conenents:
Page 1 or 1 Printed 2/39b to;10:26 AM
4 Northcast Ut6mies ICAVP DR No. DR 44P3 #78 Millstone ur* 3 Discrepancy Report Revie.or, Conn uremen DRvAuD e
Revtow Element: Moencaben Instensman D6ecipano: EW D"*"
O v.
Deserepancy Type: Instemation lmptementshon g
s,_..--
o Hvx NRC Signiesense level: 3 Date faxed to NU:
Date Puediohed: 2 s 98 r. iii Difference in installed condrolons and Modification i
documentation (PDCR MP3 93 200)
Deserepelen: This Modification changed the start initiatir.g circuits for HVR and SLCRS fans. DCN DMS-001156 93 described wiring Changes to implement the new design. This included the installation of a jumper between panels 3CES*lPNLl08 (TB1 pts 95 & 96) and IPNLt21 (TS1 pts 83 & 64). This jumper was not found installed as required. No change document could be found which modified this jumper. The DCN was incorporated into the drawings (Ref. EE 3NW Rev. 6).
Rev6ew vand inveNd Needed Date inillator Server. T. L.
O Q
Q 1r2196 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A G
O O
ir22ss l
VT Mgr: Schopfer. Don K G
O O
rasse 0
O tr27me IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:
(
INVALID:
Date:
RESOLUTION:
Previously ident49ed Ipy NUF Q Yes @ No Non Diecropont CondW6on?(,j Yes @ No paaa8 % pending?O vos @ No Paaaaadia9Unroselved?O vos (eD Na Review Acceptable Not A -- ;^
Needed Date VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A O
O O
l VT Mgri Schopfer, Dor. K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K e:
sL Comments:
Pitnied 2/39610.10.56 AM Page 1 of 1
Northeast Utilltbs ICAVP DR No. DR44PS 0987 Ministone Unit 3 Discrepancy Repoit Rev6ew Group: Connir,vesen DR VAUD Review Elemt*.: Syelem Design DiscW: strumsw Dews" O vee D6screpency Type: C*W gg 8,*.i --'NEW NRC stenecence levet: 4 Date faxed to NU Date puedlehed: 2/!W98 Descrepancy: Pipe Support Calculation Discrepancy Deecetpekm: We have reviewed the Pipe Support Calculation no. Np(F) Z79B.
421, CCN # 1, Rev.0 and stress report calculation no. NP(F)-
7923,Rev.2.
Based upon this review,we have noted the following discrepancy:
The latest revision of the Stress Report models the support as a one way restraint in z direction.
The modified support now consists of 72* long cantilever that carries the load in all three directions.
l Therefore,the support should be mode!ed as a three directional restraint.
I Review veu invou Needed One Inleteter: Kleie, N O
O O
1/27/es VT Leed: Nerl, Anmony A O
O tramie i
VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K G
O ir2ase 1RC Chmn: Sin 0h, Anand K G
O O
2/2/gs Dele:
INVALID:
j 1
Date:
RESOLUTION:
Previously identmed by NU7 O Yee t() No Non06ecropontCondition?O Yee (%) No j
ReschatonPending?O vos @ No ReeoiuiioauriresoevedrO vos @ No Rev6ew Acceptable Not Acceptable Needed Date gg, l
VT Leed: Nort, Anmony A VT Mgr; Schopter, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh. A.wwi K i
f Dele:
st Conwnente:
l j
l i
l 1
1 Printed 2/3961o;11:31 AM Page 1 or 1
)
Northeast Utiliti..
ICAVP DR No. DR.MP3 0998 Minstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Programmeo DR VALID Review Element: CorrecWve Acean Procese g
g, 06ecipene: Mechen6cel Design O va
- i ype
- Correcthe Acton implementetson
@ No Y
C4E,
SystemProcess: HVX j
NRC signoscanos level: 4 Desc faxed to NJ:
Dene Published: 2590 r
ai; Closure documents for Adverse Condition Report ACR 10855 C:
-J ~~ The closure documentation submitted by NU (via IRF 1377) for the subject ACR was not sumcient to vertfy closure, in particular, the status of AR 06005678 involving Reg. Guide 1,47 panel li0 hts is not Indicated Additionally, the s60noff sheet (NUC PI 20 Closure Request form) Indicating that ACR 10855 closure was approved by the unit projed mariagemer.t was not included.
Review Veild invalid Needed Date initietor Novarro, Mark O
Q O
iM VT Lead: Ryan, Thtmas J O
O O
im VT Mgr; Schopfer, Don K O
O O
1/2M'8 1RC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G
O O
it:7'S8 Deie:
INVALID:
Dese:
REsOf UTION:
j
~
Previously identined by NUT Q Yes
'#) No Non N--:, n;Condetton?U Yes @ No j
PMe% Pending?O vos @ No PM%UntoeolvedtO vos @ no Rev6.w Acceptende Not A- -: ;
- Needed DEe VT Leed: Ryen, Thomas J VT Mer: Schopfer. Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K g
- Date, sL Commente:
Prned 2/39610.12.o1 AM Page 1 of 1
i Northeast Ut,..
ICAVP DR No. DR MP3 0994 Ministone unr Discrepancy Report Revtew oroup: system DR VAuo Review Element: S#w Deeegn D6eciphne: I & C Design 4 y, 02, r.;y Type: Drewing gg 1
systeeWPrv.see: 9WP NRC N _. ; level: 3 Date Faxed to Nu:
Date Published: 2/5/98 D6eeropency: Conflid between LSK 910L, Rev 4 and FSAR Sealon 9.2.1.3 Dacrip#m: 3WTC SOV25A2 is identified on logic diagram LSK 910L, Rev 4 and P&lD EM 133C 16 as a non safety related component.
The valve is located in the instrument air supply line between safety related solenoid valve SW TC*SOV25A1 and the diaphragm operator of safety related air operated valve 3WTC*AOV25A Since 3WTC SOV25A2 is non safety related, it cannot be assumed that the valve would either remain as-is or fall in a safe position in the event of an accident. Therefore, if it is postulated that the air path through the *A* port of 3WTC.
SOV25A2 is blocked, it would prevent 3WTC*AOV25A from closing. In addition, if it is also Dostulated that a single failure of 3WTC*AOV258 prevents it from closing, it is conceivable that the path between the safety related portion of the service water system and the non-safety related portion (chemical feed clorination system) would not be isolated upon receipt of a CDA signal. This conflicts with the requirement to provide isolation as stated in FSAR section 9.2.1.3, Safety Evaluation. This potential dasign deficiency could impact the ability of the service water system to provide adequate flow to various safety related components, lh Valid invalid Needed Date initiator: Pene4ee, H.
O O
O ir229e VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A g
Q Q
1/2496 VT Meri Schopfer Don K O
O O
tr2sse IRC Civm: singh, Anand K O
O O
1i27/9e Date:
INVAUo:
Date:
Resolution:
Previously identmed by Nu? C) Yes
@ No Non D6screpent Cond4 tion?O Yee @ No ResolutionPending?O vos @ No Reeoivison unresolved?O vee @ No Review Acceptable Not Acceptable Needed Date gg,,
O O
O VT Lead: Nort Anthony A Vi legri Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Dele:
st Corronents:
Printed 2/39610.12 41 AM Page 1 of 1
Northeast Utiittles ICAVP DR W DRMP34m Ministone unit 3 Discrepancy Report Revtew Group: Cystem DR VALID Revtow Elemassi system Desci M op m @
D6*86 ""*: N D*8" O vos P
l l
D6ectopency Type: C-wi 4g l
s;-. A 1NEW
~
l NRC sientacance level: 3 Date faxed to NU:
DesePuhushed: 2/5ss Deseropency: Revision of Calculation SDP RSS-01361M3 for DCRs M3 97042 and 97045
==
Description:==
The Nmose of Caiculation SDP RSS-01361M3, Rev. 5 is to p-avide m L w-by line listing of RSS operating pressures and temperatures for each mode of system opetu, tion in a format which can be used as input to the piping stress analysis. The operating pressures and temperatures are determined la Cciculation P(R) 1187 Rev. 2.
Four discrepancies were identified in Calculation SDP RSS-01361M3, Rcv. 5:
- 1. (p.18) The design pressures and temperatures do not reflect those computed in P(R) 1186, Rev. 2. Design pressurn at pump suction should be 49 psig, design pressure at pump discharge should be 300 psig, design pressure at containment isolation valves MOV*20NB/C/D should be 283 psig, design pressure at Si crosstle valves MOV'6837NB & 8838NB should be 285 psig, and design temperature should be 260F throughout the entire spray circuit.
- 2. (pp.19 21) There is no source for the 39 psig operating pressure for suction piping in Operating Condition 1. This parameter is not computed in P(R)-1187, Rev. 2.
- 3. (pp. 20 21) The operating pressures !n pump suction piping for the Operating Condition 3,3RSS*P1 A test mode, agree with values computed in P(R) 1187, Rev. 2. but contradict the 50 psig value computed in US(B) 1186, Rev,2,
- 4. (pp. 20,21,25, and 26) The operating pressures in pump dewatering lines 3-RSS 150-43,51,84, and 87 are identified as equal to it.ose for the pump suction piping even though these lines are located nearly 17' 2* below the suction piping (an elevation difference which corresponds to as much as 7.4 psid).
Review Vehd invahd Needed Date initiator: Waketend. J. F.
Q Q
Q 1/2496 VT Lead: Nort, Anthony A Q
Q Q
1/2696 VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K O
O O
ii2a9e IRC chmn: Singh, Anand K G
O O
2r296 Date:
INVALID:
Date:
REsOLUTloN:
Pnnled 2/39610:13.07 AM Po;e 1 of 2
Northeast Utilkies ICAVP M No, MWM wiistone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report
- Previously idenuned try NUF V Yes (e) No Noe Decrepent Conethm?U Yoo @ No MesoluthmPeneng?O Ya @ N.
-%unroodadrO va @ N.
Review Wh NW Aeoogdalde Needed Date mg O
O VT Leed: Herl, Arthony A O
VT Mgr1 Schosk, Don K 1RC Chmn: S$, Anand K O
O Date:
SL Commente:
Printed 2/39610.13.13 AM Page 2 of 2
Northeast Utilkies ICAVP DR No. DR MP31003 Millstorm L.
- 3 Discrepancy Report Review oraup: Opershone & Maintenance end Teeung DR VAUD t
Review seement: Test Procedure l
O yes i
, --- y Type: O 4 M & T implemordet6an gg SysteWProcese: sWP NRC Signiecence M: 4 Date PAXed to NU:
l Date Putdished: 2ses
. xy: Adequate information was not provided to verify annual Inspedions of epoxy coatings.
Various modifications ir.cluded applying epoxy coatings to portions of the service water system piping and component surfaces to preveat future corrosion. A requirement that this coating be visually examined annually to assure its Integrity was included the PDCR's. Adequate information was not provided to verify that all coating areas are inspected annually and that an accepan,,e criterial for the visual inspection has been established, This is considered a generic programati: discrepancy.
A partiallisting of PDCR's that included application of an epoxy coating includes:
PDCR 3 94-064 PDCR 3-91024 PDCR 3 91044 PDCR 3-94 040 PDCR 3-86-083 PDCR 3 93 220 PDCR 3 91056 PDCR 3 94-094 Rev6ew Velid Inval6d Needed Date insuster: Speer, R.
O O
O ica98 vii.eee: sees.Kea O
O O
tcSS8 VT Mor: Schopfw, Don K Q
Q Q
icEHI IRC Chmn: S6ngh, Anand K Q
Q Q
2G98 Dele:
INVAUO:
Date:
REsoltm0N.
Preytmely identiced by NU7
(.) Yes @ No Non Discrepent Condition?O Yes @ No neeocut6an PendinotO vu @ No R.aouionumsolv.drO Yu @ No Review Insetor: (none)
VT Leed: l,'ees, Ken VT Mor: Schop er, Don K 1RC Chmn: Singh. Anand K O
O Date:
alComments; Printed 2G9610.13 36 AM Page 1 of 1
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR-MP3-1003 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Repoft R* view 06w p: Operemone & Maintenance and Tseung DR VAUD L
h Element: Test Procedure y,,,,,
Diecrepaq Type: O 4 M & T imp 6cnontetson O Yes 8,_...
=:SWP g
NRC signiacence level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Published. PFA6 g
N-ir: Adequate information was not pr Wied to verify annual inspections of epoxy coatirigs.
M.
- Var;ous modifications included applying epoxy coatings to portions of the service viater system piping and component surfaces to pmvent future cor?osioia. A requirement that this F
coating be visually examine' annually to assure its integrity was I
J
(,
included the PDCR's. Adequate infortnation was not provided to
)
verify that all 0.oating areas are inspected annually and that an 3
seceptance critertai for the visual inApoctioit has been established.
This is considered a generic programatic discrepancy.
A pcrtialliebng of PDCR's that included application of an epoxy coating includes:
[
PDCR 3-94-064 PDCR 3-910N PDCR 3-91-044 PDCR 3-94-040 PDCR 3-88-083 PDCR 3 93-220 PDCrt 3-91056 PDCR 3-94-094 Review Valid Invead Needed Date init'alor: Spou, R.
8 O
O t'2 wee
T Lead: Bees, Km G
O O
1r28,se VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K Q
Q Q
1/2996 PtC Chmn: Segh, Anend K Q
Q Q
"'/2/96 Date:
INVAUD:
Date:
RESOLUTION
- Previounty identined by NU7 O Yes @ No Non Discrepent Coeur ion?O Yes @ No Resolution Pendmg?O v
@ No ResolutionUnremotved?O Yes @ No os E
Review Accactable Not Acceptable Naeded Date VT Leed: Besa Ken VT Mgr: Schopfer, Oc.n K IRC Chmni Sin 0h, Armnd K Date:
st Commente-
~'
Printed 2/39010:13 52 M Page 1 of 1
=
y y,.
'p.
.=r"
=-
s
.-..~._-n-.-~~+--~~~-e Northe:st Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3-1004 Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review oroup: opwsaane a Mewonence end Teerag DnVAuo h Eisenenh Omnge h PotendelOperebitty leaus 0
Ow F-- -. ey Type: Design Confeel Procedure g
Syster.Wooses: DGX NRC Signiscence level: 4 Date faxed to NO:
Done Puhashed: 2593 C+
mi; Adequate ir formation was not provided to verify updating of s
parts and materials.
E:
~ ; Adequate documentation was not provided that could be used to verify the chances to materials, parts, or components. Various
- gd PDCR's included changing the material of pising or tubing or p
j$.
updating a part or component. We were unable to verify that L
these changes were incorporated in a contiolled document which would insure thLt the revised configuration would be maintained duriN subsequent maintenance activities.
This is considered a genetic programatic discrepancy.
A partial listing of PDCR's that included changes to material or parts which could not be verified includes:
PDCR 3-96573 PDCR 3-85-025 PDCR 3-86126 PDCR 3-86-135 PDCE 3-87-057 PDGR 3-87-076 PDCR 3 90 234 PDCR 3-91022 PDCR 3-91024 PDCR 3-93 220 PDCR 3-94-094 PDCR 3-91056 PDCR 3-91-152 PDCR 3-92-024 F CR 3-93-067 PDCR 3-94-111 PDCR 3-06-557 PDCR 3-96-076 PDCR 3-86-153 PDCR ?89-032 PDCR 3-90-010 PDCR 3-90-235 PDCR 3-92-043 PDCR 3-93-043 PDCR 3-93-056 PDCR 3-93-075 PDCR 3-94-040 PDCR 3-94-065 PDCR 3-96-02 PDCR 3-96-078 Review Vend InveNd Needed Date initiator: Speer. R.
1/28/96
,Pnnted 2/19610:14:15 AM Page 1 of 2
Northeast Utillues ICAVP DR No. DR MP310M Millstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Inewtor: 4 ear,P.
O O
ii2ius6 VT Lead: Bees, Ken Q
1/2646 VT Mgr: Schophr Don K 1/29S6 IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Q
2/2,96 Date:
INVALID:
Date:
RESOLUTION PWy idehWed try NU7 O Yes (S) No -
Non E-- ---1Condluon? U Yes @ No I
M%Pending?O vos @ No P - % u weenvedr O vos @ No Review Accafm Nd AcceptaWe Needed Date m, g VT Lead: Bees, Ken VT Mgr: Seight, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Anand K Date:
SL Conuners:s:
Printed 2rJ/9610 + 20 AM page of 2 1
.a
a-ms4.--m-
< - -.e.u-
- wwm ~ +
m Northeast Utilit;es ICAVP DR N DR MP31004 Misistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Operations & Maintenerwe end Testing DR VAUD Review tiement: Change Procou O vee ri- -
y Type: Det:an ContrW Procedure g
Systemeroceae: SWP NRC Signiacance levd 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putd6ehed. 2/5/96 Diecrepency: Adequate information was not provided to verify documents were updated to re' lect support changes F--
Adequate documentation was not provided to verify that the appropriate snubber lhting and spring can han0er set point documents were updated to refied the larger snubbers and adratments to the spring can hangers. We could not verify that the correct size snubber would be inspeded or replaced or the proper spring can setting would be maintained during subsequent maintenance or inspection activities.
The supports that were impacted by the PDCR is:
3-SWP-4-PSSH131 3-SWP4PSSP423 3-SWP-4-PSSP427 Review Valid invaled Needed Date inittator: Speer, R.
1f77/96 VT Lead: Bene, Ken O
Q 1f26/96 VT Mgr: ScNufer, Don K g
Q Q
1/29/96 5tC Chmn: Singh, Anand K G
Q Q
2/296 Date:
INVAUO:
~
Date:
RESOLUTION Prm lously Wentitled by NU7 Q Yee (#J No Non Discrepent CondMion?O Yee (@ eso Reec ution Pending70 vos @ No Resolution Unresolved?O yee @ No Review Acceptable Not Acceptable Needed Me gg VT Lead: Bees, Ken VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Sinch, Anend K Date:
sL Correnerrte:
Pnnted 2/3/9610:14:48 AM Pege 1 of I
m m.
e22e--
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No, DR MP31008 umstone Unit 3 Discrepancy Report Review Group: Operettone & Melnlenance and Testing DR VALID Revlem Element: Change Process
'h
O vee ch- ; :p Type: 0 & M & T implementshon gg 01% wProcese: Rs3 NRC shymacence level: 4 Date faxed to NU:
Date Putdiohed: 2/5/06 M:,- li. Incons! stent and incompl6e documentation of PDCR for Containment Penetrat.c.
~ PCDR 3 94182 Installed test ring flanges on the four RSS suction pipes located in the floor of the Containment Structure Sump. Three discrepent conditions were id3ntified.
- 1. The description of the change included thn statement that "Following the test, the blind aonge will be removed and foreign rnaterial exclusion (FME) bolts wii:M installed in the bolt holes."
i No documentat!on was provided that e.ould be used to verify this requirement has been proceduralized or implemented.
- 2. DCM Form B Rev. O ltem 161., a copy of thle c. is included in the PDCR package, identified the following prof.,edures as needhg to be revised to complete the PDCR.
SP36128.4 and OPS Forms -80, 81, -82, & -83 SP3612A.1 and OPS Form -1 OPS Forms 3306-1 & 2 No documene,lon was provided that could be used to verifv SP3812A.1 and OPS Form-1, CONTAINMENT INSPECTION, were revised to inspect the Conteinment Structure Sump as part of the Containment inspection and verify the blind flanges were removed and the FME bolts installed.
No documentation was provided that could be used to verify OPS Forms 3306-1 & -2, VALVE LINE UP FOR CONTAINMENT RECIRCULATION SPRAY SYSTEM (TRAIN A & B), were revised to reflect the new flanges.
OPS Forms 36128.4-80, -81, -82, & -83 were revised to Indicate that 'AWO to MNTC-blank flange to be installed in the CTMT sump". No documentation was provided that could be used to vrAfy an AWO to maintenance or some other method of controlling the removal of the blind flange after the local leak rate test (C.LRT) was generated.
- 3. Memo MP3-DE 2515 dated December 22,1994
Subject:
Resolution of PORC Comment on PDCR MP3-94-162., a copy of this memo is included in the PDCR package, includes a comment on the subject PDCR that was raised during PORC meeting 3-94-206. The comment "... involves confirmation that blind flanges installed during LLRT testing are later removed.
The LLRT test procedure SP36128.4 addressed removal of equipment installed for testing. However, as an added measure, this confirmation could also be added to the containment close out list, containment tump cover installation process, or other appropriate vehicles." No documentation was provided that enidd he inta in verifv POR(N enmmente warn inenrnnrntad Printed 2/3/9310:15:15 AM Pagei of 2
,pe
---*e>w er*
6 N+
Northeast Utilities ICAVP DR No. DR MP3-1008 -
tAssistone unit 3 Discrepancy Report proceduralized, or dispositionad, Ro h Vow invalid Needed Date initiator: Speer, R.
O 1127/96 VT Lead: Bees, Ken Q
1/26/96 VT Mgr: Schacht. Don K Q
1!29/96 IRC Chne: Singh, Anand K Q
Q 2!2A16 Dele:
INVAllO:
Date:
RESOLUTION:
Prowously iden#And by NU7 Q Yes @ No Non h-
- Condition?U Yes (9) No PaaahdM Pending70 vos @ No Paaah*% Untosolved70 vos @ No Poview
^--^": Not Acceptable Neocod Date g
VT Lead: Bees, Ken VT Mgr: Schopfer, Don K IRC Chmn: Singh, Aneral K Dele:
SL Conen;nte:
r 9
Printed 2G9610:15:20 AM Page 2 of 2
-