ML20199J832
| ML20199J832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1986 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Jens W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20199J838 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8607080446 | |
| Download: ML20199J832 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1986018
Text
__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
,
.
.
.
'JUN 0 51996
Docket No. 50-341
The Detroit Edison Company
ATTN: Wayne. H. Jens
Vice President
Nuclear Operations
6400 North Dixie Highway
Newport, MI 48166
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. J. Foster, and
Ms. M. Smith of this office on May 19-23, 1986 of activities at the Enrico
Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2, authorized by NRC Operating License
No. NPF-33 and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. T. Randazzo and
others of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the
inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection.
During the exit interview, we received a commitment to revise your Emergency
Plan to include provisions for periodic shift augmentation drills to
demonstrate the ability to augment on-shift personnel in the event of an
emergency. Actions taken to fulfill this commitment will be reviewed in a
subsequent inspection.
Open Items that were identified during this inspection are summarized in the
Enclosure A to this letter.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this
letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the
NRC Public Document Room.
[
860708044
e
6 8606 ,05
~
4
-
,
_ _ _
- - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _
-
,
.
.
JUN O 51986
The Detroit Edison Company
-2-
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
l
h&
W. D.
afer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Enclosure A
Open Items
2.
Inspection Report
No. 50-341/86018(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosures:
l
L. P. Bregni, Licensing
i
Engineer
P. A. Marquardt, Corporate
Legal Department
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Ronald Callen, Michigan
Public Service Commission
Harry H. Voigt, Esq.rson
Nuclear Facilities and
Environmental Monitoring
Section
W. Weaver, FEMA, Region V
D. Matthews, EPB, 0IE
1
1
l
!
nell h
%
fr
IW
o
Foster / s
mith
Anur
E
-
.
.
.
.
.
Enclosure A
Open Items
1.
The guidance provided in NUREG-0654, Appendix 1, page 1-17, item 3 (note)
to " consider 2 mile precautionary evacuation" in the case of loss of
physical control of the facility, was not reflected in procedure EP-545,
" Protective Action Guidelines and Recommendations". This item was also
noted in the previous inspection report (50-341/85034(DRSS)).
4
Open Item No. (341/86018-01).
2.
The licensee was encouraged to incorporate semi-annual activation of
emergency call-out procedures as part of their emergency preparedness plan
and drill program. A commitment to this effect was made during the exit
interview. Open Item No. (341/86018-02).
3.
Previous inspection report (50-341/85034(DRSS)) noted that work orders to
correct the orientation of the meteorology tower instrumentation booms into
the prevailing wind (per Reg. Guide 1.23) were in progress.
Subsequently,
these work orders were apparently misplaced and the work was never done.
It was stated that a new work order had been issued. Open Item
No. (341/86018-03).
4.
A detailed review of the 1986 annual emergency preparedness audit
indicated that an evaluation of interfaces with offsite authorities had
been indirectly addressed within several portions of the audit, but had
not been specifically addressed.
In addition, discussion with licensee
personnel indicated that the audit is made available to offsite
authorities during various meetings, but no documentation was available to
verify that this had been done.
10 CFR 50.54(t) requires that the audit
address the adequacy of the interface with offsite authorities, and that
'
the audit be made available to offsite authorities. Documentation should
be available to show that these requirements have been met. Open Item
No. (341/86018-04).
4
- - - - . -_
_ _ .
._ . . _ . - -