ML20199F647
| ML20199F647 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1985 |
| From: | Medford M SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8606240447 | |
| Download: ML20199F647 (300) | |
Text
--
4 O ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPOR For1985 SAN ON0FRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNITS 1,2, & 3 l
A - L ~ch w - --"
w ; at%
O h, .s i e EiEs- " m i n i m M M En i m m imi
\/ V"
/
[ h Southern California Edison Company San Diego Gas and Electric Company Docket Nos. 50-206,50-361,50-362 sdg\d License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10, NPE-15 O
[e8'"28888sa8jjg6 April 30,1986 L _ . _j
\ TABLE OF CONTENTS i Page i,
TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................... i LIST OF TABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii I. INTRODUCTION A. The Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 B. Objectives ...................... 1 C. Sample Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 I D. Sample Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
]
I A. Direct Radiation ................... 3 i
B. Airborne Particulates Activity .. ... . .. . . . . 4 C. Airborne Radioiodine . .. .. . . ... . . ..... 4 D. Ocean Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ,
E. Drinking Water .................... 5 F. Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand) .... . . ..... . 8 j G. Ocean Bottom Sediment . . . . . ... .. .... . . . 8 1
H. Non-Migratory Marine Species . ..... . .. ... . 9 PART A. Flesh .................... 9 i
PART B. Shell and Bone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 I. Local Crops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 l J. Soil Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 K. Kelp Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 III. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA . . . ... .... . . ... . 21 IV. CONCLUSIONS ........................ 24
) V. REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 i
i
. . __ _ . _ . _ . - . - - ., , _ . _ _ . , , - _ _ - - - _ _ , . , _ , _ _ , __-___..s.-. , , _ , , . . . . _ _ . . . - . -
j TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
Page i
VI. APPENDICES . . .......................
A. Sample Type and Sampling Location . . . . . . . . . . . A-1 a
B. Program Data Summary for 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 C. Summary of Interlaboratory Comparisons ........ C -1
- 0. Measurements Exceeding Investigation Levels . . . . . . 0-1
- E. Comparison of Operational Data with Preoperational Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1 F. Historical Trending of Environmental Data . . . . . . . F-1 G. Deviations from Sampling Requirements . . . . . . . . . G-1 4 H. Land Use Census . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H-1 I. Data Tables (Raw Data) f or 1985 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1 J. Figures .................. .... J -l 5
4 l
J b
- a i
., i i
l l
l 11 i
LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page 11-1 Ocean Water Data 6 l II-2 Whole Body Ingestion Dose (mrem /yr) 14 II-3 Comparison of Maximum Radioactivity Levels in 25 Environmental Samples versus Technical Specification (TS) Reporting Levels A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations A-2 1 A-2 Pic-Radiological Environmental Monitoring Locations A8 A-3 Sector and Direction Designation for Radiological A -9 Environmental Monitoring Sample Location Map t
l 1 thru 15 Program Data Summary for 1985 B-1 to i B-71 E- 1 Drinking Water, Preoperational and Operational Data E -8
( E-2 Ocean Bottom Sediments, Preoperational and Operational Data E-11 E -3 Marine Species, Preoperational and Operational Data E -13 E-4 Local Crops, Preoperation and Operational Data E-22 F-1 Soil Data F-2
- F-2 Beach Sand F-4 1
F-3 Gross Beta Activity in Air F-7 l
F-4 Crops F-10 F-5 Kelp F-14 H-1 SONGS 1 Land Use Census Summary Sheet H-12 H-2 SONGS 2 and 3 Land Use Census Summary Sheet H-13 1 thru 15 Raw Data I-1 to I-49 '
O iii i
i
D I. INTRODUCTION San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) consists of three pressurized water nuclear reactors housed in separate containment buildings. Unit 1 attained initial criticality June 1967, and operated until February 1982 when it was shut down for seismic modifications. The unit was brought back into service during December 1984. Unit 2 and Unit 3 attained initial criticality July 1982 and August 1983, respectively, and have been in operation since then.
To monitor the operations of SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3, and to fulfill the requirements of the SONGS Technical Specifications, an operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) was conducted at SONGS during 1985. This program was designed to quantify ambient l
radiation levels in the environs of SONGS, and to identify and quantify concentrations of radioactivity in various environmental media in the vicinity of SONGS which have a potential exposure pathway to man.
Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) were used to measure direct radiation levels. Sampled environmental media included the following:
soil, shoreline sediment (beach sand), air, local crops, non-migratory marine species, kelp, drinking water, ocean water and ocean bottom sediments. Each of the samples were analyzed for both naturally occurring and station related radionuclides.
A. The Program fg In its operational phase, the REMP was conducted in accordance with Sections 3.18 and 4.18 of the SONGS Unit 1 Technical Specifications, and Section 3/4.12 of the SONGS Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications.
B. Obiectives The objectives of the operational REMP are:
- 1. To fulfill the obligation for radiological surveillance required by Technical Specifications.
- 2. To determine whether there is any significant increase in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.
- 3. To detect any significant change in ambient gamma radiation levels.
i 4. To verify that the operation of SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 have no assessable detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or the environment.
l l
v
., 2 b Sample Collection C.
Samples of various environmental media were obtained in order to meet the stated objectives. The selection of sample types was based on established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the erivironment to man, experience gained during the preoperational phase, and the evaluation of data during the operational phase. Sampling locations were determined with consideration given to site meteorology, local demographs and land uses.
Sampling locations were divided into two classes -- indicator and control. Indicator locations were those expected to manifest effects of
, Station (i .e. , SONGS) operations. Control stations were at locations considered to be unaffected by Station operations.
D. Sample Analysis Environmental samples were collected at different locations (listed in Appendix A) in the vicinity of SONGS, and then submitted to a contracted radiological laboratory. Each sample.was analyzed using standard chemical procedures. The results of the analyses are summarized in Appendix B, and presented in Appendix I by sample type and analysis. The tabulated means, ranges and standard deviations presented in Appendix B were calculated using standard statistical methods according to the O format specified in USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.8 (1975).
U To assure quality of sample analyses, a portion of the REMP wa.s devoted to quality control. -The main aspects of this part of te program included process quality control, instrument quality control, comprehensive data reviews, and EPA inter-laboratory cross-check analyses. The results of the EPA cross-check analyses are presented in Appendix C.
The impact of SONGS on the surrounding environment was assessed through a series of analyses. These analyses included: (1) comparison of data between indicator and control locations for each sample type, (2) identification of radionuclide concentrations exceeding investigation levels, (3) historical trending of radionuclide concentrations in sampled environmental media over a period of several years, and (4) comparison of operational to preoperational environmental data. Summaries and comparison of indicator to control locations are presented in Section II (page 3) of the report. Other data comparisons are presented in Appendices A through F.
O I _ _ _ _
m l 3 i
a i II. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS OF 1985 ENVIRONMENTAL DATA l
Direct Radiation A.
l The purpose of this program element was to measure the amount of i environmental gamma and beta radiation in the vicinity of SONGS. To i accomplish this task, calcium sulfate (CaSO 4 :0y) and lithium fluoride
' (Lif) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed at each of 67 indicator and control locations, collected and analyzed at prescribed l The control location was situated in Huntington Beach. The
- intervals.
calcium sulfate TL0s were collected quarterly and were replaced with re-zeroed dosimeters, while the lithium fluoride dosimeters were collected af ter an exposure period of one year (i.e., at the end of 1985). A total of 266 calcium sulfate TL0s and 67 lithium fluoride TL0s
- were collected and analyzed throughout the year.
After the samples were analyzed, the measured doses were corrected for i pre- and post-field exposure times. During the course of the year, the
- quarterly dose measured by the calcium sulfate TLDs from the indicator i locations ranged from 9.4 to 26.7 mrem (excluding the SONGS met tower),
i with an average dose of 20.4 mrem. San Onofre meteorological tower had 1 the highest TLD reading in the fourth quarter. The doses measured at j this location ranged from 21.3 to 103.6 mrem, with an average dose of
- 42.5 mrem. The quarterly dose measured by the calcium sulfate dosimeters from the control location, on the other hand, ranged from 21.1 to 23.7 O
mrem with an average cose of 22.6 mrem. Fiaures la and lb present TLD I doses measured at six of the indicator locations vs. those measured at
! the control location during 1985. Fiqure la also shows that the external radiation level at control location of Huntington Beach is somehow higher than the indicator location. In most of the locations, a correlation can i be seen between the control and indicator locations which indicates other i factors such as environmental and seasonal variations are responsible and that plant effects are negligible.
i The direct radiation dose indicated by the lithium fluoride dosimeters l ranged from 36.8 to 115.5 mrem (excluding the SONGS met tower which is j within the exclusion area boundary) for all the indicator locations with i an average dose of 84.2 mrem. The dose measured from the control
] location was 98.9 mrem. The SONGS meteorological tower showed a value of i 174.8 mrem.
, The dose value of 104.0 mrem measured at SONGS meteorological tower in
' the fourth quarter and annual dose of 174.8 mrem is due to the presence
- of radwaste vehicles containing radioactive waste being shipped for disposal. The vehicios were parked 6 and 20 feet away from this TLD i location in the last week of December. Calculations show'that the values i observed are reasonable and are consistent with values expected as a j l result of such occurrence. '
i lO i
i
_ _ , _ . . _ . - - - - , - - - - - , _ , . , , - _ ._,.- _ -..-,- .--.-. _ _ ----_-, . - -,.,._..~.,_..,_.. - _ . - . . _ _ . _ _ . . - - . -
4 D
k-- Doses measured at indicator locations were considered significant if they were greater than doses measured at the control locations by 25 percent.
Using this criterion, it was determined that there were no significant doses at indicator locations during 1985, except one location (SONGS met tower), and that SONGS operations had negligible impact on this environmental medium.
B. Airborne Particulates Activity Air particulate samples were collected on a weekly basis from eight
! indicator locations and a control station in Huntington Beach. After collection, the samples were analyzed for gross beta activity with a lower limit of detection of 0.001 pCi/m3 of air. Samples were also composited quarterly and analyzed for 11 naturally-occurring and Station-related radionuclides by gamma-spectral analysis, radiostrontium by beta 4
counting and for gross alpha radioactivity by alpha counting.
Gross beta activity was detected in each weekly airborne particulate sample collected in 1985. The concentration of gross beta activity in the samples collected from the indicator locations ranged from 0.010 to 0.068 pCi/m3 , with an average concentration of 0.020 pCi/m 3 of air.
The concentration of gross beta activity in the samples from Huntington Beach, however, ranged from 0.010 to 0.071 pCi/m 3, with an average concentration of 0.021 pCi/m3 of air. Fiqure 2 shows the variation in g gross beta activity of the control location is in the same direction as i / the indicator. This indicates that the change in the activity may be due to seasonal and environmental conditions'.
Beryllium-7, cosmically produced, was the only gamma-emitting radionuclide detected in each quarterly composite airborne particulate sample from both indicator and control locations. The concentrations of beryllium-7 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged f rom 0.067 to 0.147 pCi/m3, with an average concentration of 0.107 pCi/m3 of air. The concentration of beryllium-7 in the samples from the control location ranged from 0.096 to 0.131 pCi/m 3, with an average concentration of 0.111 pCi/m 3 of sample.
The concentration of strontium-90 was below the lower limit of detection of 0.001 pCi/m3 for all indicator and control locations throughout the year. Gross alpha radioactivity was also below the lower limit of detection of 0.0003 pCi/m3 in all locations in the year 1985. The impact of SONGS on this environmental medium was insignificant.
C. Airborne Radioiodine Weekly air radioiodine samples were collected by adsorption on charcoal cartridges from eight locations in the vicinity of SONGS, and from a control locations situated in Huntington Beach, By the end of 1985, a total of 468 air cartridges had been analyzed for their iodine-131 ,
content.
()
v l
l
l 5
l O No iodine-131 was detected in any of f site air samples. The concentration of radioiodine (I-131) in some indicator samples ranged f rom 0.05 to ;
l i 1.51 pCi/m3 with an average of 0.37 pCi/m3 . These air samples were j collected from areas within the exclusion area boundary. In the rest of the samples, concentration of I-131 was below the lower limit of ,
l detection of 0.04 pCi/m 3 . Appendix I lists the data for I-131 in
} Table 3.
! I D. Ocean Water t
Ocean water samples were collected on a monthly basis from the vicinity i' of each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from a control location situated in Newport Beach. Upon collection, each of the samples was j analyzed for 19 naturally-occurring and Station-related, gamma-emitting :
i radionuclides. Every other month, the samples were also analyzed for '
i gross beta activity. Finally, samples composited quarterly and
- semiannually and were analyzed for tritium.
j Throughout 1985, potassium-40 was the only radionuclide detected in
. monthly gamma-spectra analyses of samples from both indicator and control
! locations. Potassium-40 ranged in indicator samples from 290 to 360 pC1/1 throughout the year with an average of 322 pC1/1. The control
. had a range of 280 to 350 pCi/1 with an average of 325 pC1/1. Other
! radionuclides were not detected in the ocean water sample and their lower
! limit of detections are listed in Appendix B. Potassium-40 also j accounted for at least 99 percent of the detected gross beta activity in !
j each of the samples. A summary of the results is presented in
! Table 11-1. Finally, no tritium was observed in any of the composite j ocean water samples with the lower limit of detection of 100 pCi/1. i
{ Because virtually all of the observed radioactivity in each of the j samples can be attributed to potassium-40 (which is a naturally.
! occurring, non-station related radionuclide), it was concluded that the ,
operation of SONGS had negligible impact on this environmental medium, li i E. Orinkina Water l
- Drinking water samples were collected on a monthly basis from two
! indicator locations and from a control location situated in Huntington i Beach. Upon collection, the samples were analyzed for tritium as well as for 12 naturally-occurring and Station.related gamma-emitting radionuclides. Afterwards, the samples were filtered, so that the ,
i suspended solids and filtrate could be analyzed separately for gross i l alpha and gross beta concentrations. Samples from each location were 1 also composited quarterly. and filtered in the same manner. In each ,
instance, the suspended solids were analyzed for gross beta concentrations, and the filtrates were analyzed for gross beta
! concentrations, as well as for tritium.
l i
i i
?
6 TABLE 11-1 OCEAN WATER DATA 1985 Bimonthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity Analysis Activity (DCi/1)
Date Type Control SONGS 1 SONGS 2 SONGS 3 i
1/6/85 G. Beta 970 990 1040 810
! 1/6/85 G. Beta less K-40 0 0 0 0 1
3/11/85 G. Beta 720 710 760 780 j 3/11/86 G. Beta less K-40 0 0 0 0
. 5/16/85 G. Beta 720 870 920 700 5/16/85 G. Beta less K-40 0 6 8 7 7/3/85 G. Beta 760 500 640 650 7/3/85 G. Beta less K-40 3 3 4 3 i
9/5/85 G. Beta 1300 1400 1070 1010 1 9/5/85 G. Beta less K-40 0 7 9 8 l 11/4/85 G. Beta 800 900 700 800 11/4/85 G. Beta less K-40 0 8 10 8
() Abbreviations = G, gross,; K-40, Potassium-40 4
{
i l
i I i
.I
)
I i,
r- .. ---,,------.w- .-c, .w, m-,__,-.,. _
7 -r.-_ - - - . --,_<a ~+_.,---mme-%rr..--w_-w.wm---%,-yv,
l 7 l l
\~ / The results of the monthly drinking water analyses were similar for both indicator and control locations. Throughout the year, neither gamma-emitting radionuclides nor tritium were detected in any of the unfiltered samples, nor was any alpha radioactivity detected in either the residue or filtrate of the filtered samples. Gross beta activity, however, was detectable in both the drinking water solids and filtrate of each of the samples. The gross beta activity in the drinking water solids from the indicator locations ranged from a low of 0.20 pCi/l to a high of 0.70 pC1/1 of water, with an average concentration of 0.38 pC1/1 of water. The concentration of gross beta activity in the drinking water solids from the control location in Huntington Beach was comparable. The gross beta activity ranged from 0.20 to 0.40 pC1/1, with an average concentration of 0.26 pCi/l of water. The concentration of gross beta activity in the filtrate was higher for both the indicator and control locations. The concentration of gross beta activity in the filtrates from the indicator locations ranged from 7.0 to 18.0 pCi/1, with an average concentration of 11.3 pCi/l of water. In contrast, the concentration of gross beta activity at the control location ranged from 4.0 to 10.0 pCi/l of water, with an average concentration of 6.6 pCi/l of water.
The results of the analyses of the Quarterly composite samples for gross alpha and gross beta activities were similar. No gross alpha radioactivity was detected in any of the suspended solids, and no tritium or gross beta activity was detected in any of the filtrates. However, as O in the monthly analyses, gross beta activity was detected in both the filtrates and the suspended solids. The concentration of gross beta activity in the suspended solids from the indicator locations ranged from 0.20 to 0.60 pC1/1 with an average concentration of 0.32 pCi/l of water.
The concentration of gross beta activity in the suspended solids from the control location ranged from 0.20 to 0.30 pCi/1, with an average concentration of 0.25 pCi/l of water.
The quarterly gross beta activity in the filtrates from all the locatiens i was higher than the activities detected in the suspended solids. The
! concentration of gross beta activities in the filtrates from the indicator locations ranged from 7.0 to 19.0 pCi/1, with an average concentration of 11.8 pC1/1 of water. The concentration of gross beta activities in the filtrates from the control locations, on the other hand, ranged from 6.0 to 10.0 pCi/1, with an average concentration of 8.8 pCi/l of water.
None of the radioactivity measured in either the monthly or quarterly drinking water samples can be attributed to the operations of SONGS since liquid effluents are released solely into the ocean, and not into potential sources of public drinking water. The significant difference in activity between indicator and control locations, therefore, must be attributable to variability in natural environmental levels.
O ;
8 O
O F. Shoreline Sediment (Beach Sand)
Beach sand was collected semiannually from three indicator locations, and from a control station situated in Huntington Beach. After collection, the samples were analyzed for nineteen dif ferent Station and non-Station related radionuclides. By the end of the year, three naturally-occurring radionuclides had been detected in the samples: potassium-40, radium-226 and thorium-228.
- Potassium-40 in all indicator samples ranged from 10.50 to 13.40 pCi/g i with an a.erage of 12.33 pCi/g. The control location K-40 concentration was in the range of 15.20 to 16.90 pCi/g. The concentration range for Ra-??6 was 0.15 to 0.72 pC1/g in all indicator sites with an average of 0.36 pCi/9 The control location of Newport Beach showed an average level of 0.52 with a range of 0.51 to 0.52 pCi/g. Thorium 228 also had an activity range of 0.20 to 1.05 pCi/g at the indicators and 1.41 to 2.00 pC1/g at the control location.
A special beach sand analysis was also performed in April at Units 2 and 3 intake and outfall, 1 mile north of Units 2 and 3, 2 miles north of Units 2 and 3, 1 mile south of Units 2 and 3, and 2 miles south of Units 2 and 3. The results show no observable accumulation in this medium. All the plant specific radionuclides were below the lower limit of detection.
I Although the radionuclide concentrations show variation (i.e., from one collection period to another), comparable concentrations of a given radionuclide were observed in both indicator and control samples for the same sampling period.
The fact that no Station-related radionuclides were detected in any of the samples indicates that the operation of SONGS during 1985 had an apparently negligible effect on this environmental medium, and on the public.
4 G. Ocean Bottom Sediment To determine the amount of radioactivity in ocean bottom sediments in the ;
vicinity of the Station, representative samples were collected j semiannually from areas near each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from Newport Beach, which served as a control location. After collection, the samples were analyzed by gamma-spectral analysis for a total of 19 naturally occurring and Station-related radionuclides. By the end of the year, four radionuclides had been detected in the samples, namely: cobalt-60 and naturally occuring potassium 40, radium-226 and thorium-228. The results of these analyses are summarized below in terms of "as received" wet sample weights.
Potassium 40 was detectable in each sample. The concentration of potassium-40 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged from 6.8 to 14.1 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 11.0 pC1/gm of sample.
9 f~x
'As The concentration of potassium-40 in the samples from the control location ranged from 10.1 to 14.1 pC1/gm, with an average concentration of 12.2 pCi/gm of sample.
Naturally occurring radium was present in each of the samples. The concentration of radium-226 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged from 0.22 to 0.58 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 0.41 pCi/gm of sample. The concentration of radium-226 in the samples from the control location were similar. Here, the concentration of radium-226 ranged from 0.10 to 0.17 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 0.14 pCi/gm of sample.
Naturally-occurring thorium-228 was present in each of the samples in about the same concentrations as radium-226. The concentration of thorium-228 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged from 0.26 to 0.95 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 0.58 pCi/gm. The concentration of thorium-228 in the samples from the control location, on the other hand, ranged from a low of 0.10 to 0.17 pCi/gm, 0.14 pCi/gm of sample.
In addition to this, cobalt 60 was detected in the first semiannual sample from the west side of the SONGS Unit 1 outfall. The concentration of cobalt-60 in this sample was determined to be 0.09 pC1/gm. Cobalt-60 was detected in a sample from the control location for that same period with an activity level of 0.09 pCi/gm sample.
Three of the radionuclides, namely, potassium-40, radium-226 and thorium.228, are naturally-occurring in the environment and are not produced by Station operations. The presence of cobalt-60 *n one of the samples, however, may be attributable to liquid effluent releases from the plant. Because cobalt-60 was detectable in only one of the samples, it was concluded that the operation of SONGS had minimal inpact on this environmental medium.
H. Non-Migratory Marine Species PART A. Analysis of Flesh fish, crustacea and mollusks were collected quarterly by each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from a control location i.1 Newport Beach, to determine the amount of radioactivity that could be censumed by man or in the food chain to man. Upon collection, the flesh por tion of each sample was analyzed for three naturally occurring radionJclides including potassium-40, radium-226 and thorium 228. The samples were also analyzed for 16 Station-related, gamma. emitting radionuclides including cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137. Finally, each sample was analyzed for aqueous and bound tritium, by beta counting. The results of these analyses are summarized below for wet sample weights.
O V
10 SONGS Unit 1. Sheechead:
Sheephead (fish) were collected quarterly during 1985 near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall. Upon analysis, naturally-occurring radium 226 and thorium-228 were not detected in any of the samples.
Plant-related radionuclides detected in Sheephead included cobalt-60 and cesium-137. Cobalt-60 was observed in samples in the first, second and third quarters at concentratio1s of 0.25, 0.003 and 0.0045 pCi/g of samp!e, in that order. Finally, cesium-137 was detected in samples from each quarter. The concentrations of cesium-137 in the samples ranged f rom 0.0030 to 0.0077 pCi/g, inveraging 0.0052 pCi/g of sample.
Cobalt-58, cobalt-60, cesium.134 and cesium-137 levels detected in Sheephead at the SONGS Unit ' outf all were commensurate with or higher than the concentrations measered in Sheephead in Newport Beach.
Fiqures 3a and 3b compare tre levels of cobalt-60 and cesium-137 observed in Sheephead collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall to the concentrations seen in Sheephead collected near Newport Beach.
SONGS Unit 1. Black Perch:
Black Perch (fish) were collected quarterly near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was detected in perch samples from all four quarters. Howe /er, no radium.226 or thorium 228 were seen in O any of the samples.
, Plant-related radionuclides detected in Black Perch included cobalt-60 l and cesium-137. Cesium-137 was observed in samples f rom all four quarters. The concentrations of cesium-137 seen in the samples ranged from 0.0049 to 0.0065 pCi/g of sample, averaging 0.0057 pCi/g of sample.
! The potassium-40 levels seen in Black Perch at the SONGS Unit 1 outfall i
were commensurate with the levels seen at the north control. Cobalt-60 j and cesium-137 levels detected in the Black Perch at the SONGS Unit I
! outfall were commensurate to or higher than the concentrations measured j in Black Perch from Newport Beach, fiaures 4a and 4b compare the levels l of cobalt-60 and cesium-137 observed in Black Perch collected near the l SONGS Unit 1 outfall to those seen in Black Perch collected near Newport Beach.
Pile Perch (fish) caught at Unit 1 outfall in second quarter had a cobalt-60 activity of 0.023 pCi/g and Cs-137 activity of 0.0158 pCi/g.
Opaleye caught at Unit 2 outfall had an activity of 0.0070 pC1/g for cobalt-60 and 0.0131 pCi/g for Cs-137. Aqueous tritium was found in the Pile Perch sample taken at Unit 2 outfall in the second quarter. The activity was 0.03 pC1/g.
O J
11 Os SONGS Unit 1. Crustacea:
l Spiney Lobster were collected quarterly near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall.
- Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only naturally-occurring radionuclide detected in the samples.
Plant-related radionuclides detected in crustacea included cobalt-58, j
cobalt-60 and cesium-137. Cesium-137 was detected in samples f rom the second, third and fourth quarters at concentrations of 0.007, 0.0094 and 0.0058 pCi/g of sample, in that order. Cobalt-60 was observed in samples in the first three quarters. The concentrations of cobalt-60 in these samples ranged from 0.010 to 0.040 pC1/g of sample, averaging 0.030 pC1/g i of sample.
The potassium-40 levels seen in crustacea at the SONGS Unit 1 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen in crustacea from Newport Beach.
Cobalt-60 and cesium-137 levels detected in crustaceae samples at the j SONGS Unit 1 outfall were commensurate to or higher than the
- concentrations measured in crustacea from Newport Beach. Fiqures 5a and i
Sb compare the levels of cobalt-60 and cesium-137 observed in crustacea collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall to the same radionuclide concentrations seen in crustacea collected near Newport Beach.
i
, SONGS Unit 1. Mollusks:
() Sea Hare were collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, three naturally-occurring radionuclides --
potassium 40, radium-226 and thorium-228 .- were detected in varying amounts in samples from each quarter.
Station related radionuclides detected in the Sea Hare included i
cobalt 58, cobalt 60 and cesium-137. Cesium-137 was not detected in samples from the fourth quarter. Cobalt-58 was observed in samples from the second, third and fourth quarters at concentrations of 0.29, 0.36 and 0.31 pCi/g of sample. Cobalt 60 was observed in each set of samples.
The concentrations of cobalt-60 in these samples ranged from 0.430 to a high of 1.900 pCi/g, averaging 1.040 pC1/g of sample.
The potassium-40 levels seen in mollusks collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen in samples from the 1 Newport Beach. Cobalt 58, cobalt-60 and cesium-137 levels detected in mollusks in the vicinity of the SONGS Unit 1 outfall were detectably higher than the concentrations measured in mollusks from Newport Beach.
Fiaures 6. 7a and 7b compare the levels of cobalt-58, cobalt 60 and l
! cesium-137 observed in mollusks collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outf all to the concentrations seen in mollusks collected near Newport Beach.
! SONGS Units 2 and 3. SheeDhead:
Sheephead (fish) were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls during each quarter of 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only i
I O naturally. occurring radionuclide detected in Sheephead.
I
12 l
l i
Cesium-137 and cobalt-60 were the only plant related radionuclides detected in the samples. Cesium-137 was observed in samples f rom the first, second, third and fourth quarters at concentrations of 0.0042, 0.0039, 0.00?0 and 0.0082 pCi/g of sample, respectively. Cobalt-60 was observed in samples from the first and fourth quarters at a level of 0.006 and 0.005 pCi/g, respectively (Fiaure 8a).
The levels of potassium-40 seen in Sheephead at the SONGS Unit 2 and 3 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen at the north control.
Cesium-137 concentrations in samples f rom the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall, on the other hand, were commensurate with or greater than the levels of cesium-137 measured in samples from Newport Beach (Fiqure 8b).
SONGS Unit 2 and 3. Black Perch:
Black Perch, Opaleye (fish) and Sand Bass were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls during 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only naturally-occurring radionuclide detected in each set of samples.
Cobalt-60 and cesium-137 were observed in Sand Bass caught at Units 2 and 3 outfall in the first quarter. The concentration of cobalt-60 was 0.005 pCi/g and cesium-177 was 0.0054 pCi/g. Potassium-40 was the only naturally-occurring radionuclide observed in Sand Bass.
Plant-related radionuclides detected in these samples included aqueous tritium, cobalt-60 and cesium-137. Aqueous tritium was found in Opaleye I samples from the second quarter at a concentration of 0.04 pCi/g of i
sample. Cesium-137 was observed in samples f rom all four quarters. The concentrations of cesium-137 in the Black Perch samples were 0.0053 and 1 0.0111 pCi/g of sample, for the third and fourth quarters of 1985.
Cesium-137 concentration in Opaleye was 0.0064 and 0.0041 for the first and second quarters respectively. Cobalt-60 concentration in opaleye was 0.037 and 0.039 pCi/g for the first and second quarters of 1985.
- Cobalt-60 in Black Perch caught in the third and fourth quarters was below the lower limit of detection of 0.007 pCi/g.
The levels of potassium-40 seen in Black Perch at the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen in samples collected from the north control. Cobalt-60 and cesium-137 concentrations seen in perch samples from the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall, on the other hand, were either commensurate with or greater than the levels of cesium 137 measured in samples from Newport Beach. See E_ioures 9a and 9b.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Crustacea:
Spiney Lobster (crustacea) were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the
- only naturally. occurring radionuclide detected in the samples.
O
13 i
p
's- Plant-related radionuclides detected in spiney lobster included cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137. Silver-110m was observed in samples from the second quarter at a concentration of 0.006 pCi/g of sample. Cobalt-60 was detected in samples from the first, second and fourth quarters at concentrations of 0.012, 0.028 and 0.002 pCi/g of sample, respectively.
The levels of potassium-40 seen in crustacea at the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen in samples from the control location. Concentration of cobalt-60 and cesium-137 seen in crustacea samples from the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall, on the other hand, were greater than the levels measured in samples from Newport Beach. See figures 10a and 10b. The level of cesium-137 was 0.0040, 0.0051 and 0.0072 for the last three quarters, respectively.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Mollusks:
Bay Mussel and Sea Hare were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, only one
, naturally-occurring radionuclide, potassium-40, was detected in each set of quarterly samples.
Plant-related radionuclides detected in the mollusks included cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and cesium-137. The concentration of cesium 137 in the sample was determined to be 0.0060 pCi/g of sample, in the third quarter.
)/ Cobalt-60 was detected in samples from all four quarters. Cobalt-58 was detected in first, third and fourth quarters of 1985. The concentrations of cobalt-58 in the samples ranged from 0.012 to 0.160 averaging 0.065 pCi/g of sample. The concentrations of cobalt-60 in these samples ranged from 0.021 to 0.170 pCi/g, averaging 0.088 pCi/g of sample.
The levels of potassium-40 seen in mollusks at the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall were commensurate with the levels seen in samples from the control location. Concentrations of Station-related radionuclides seen in mollusks from the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall were commensurate with or greater than the levels of the same radionuclides measured in samples from Newport Beach. See figures lla and lib.
Conclusions (Part A):
These dita indicate that the operation of SONGS had a minor but i detectable impact on this environmental medium. Results of ingestion l dose calculations have been listed in Table 11-2. Data show that the ingestion dose due to consumption of marine species is a very small fraction of the maximum dose. The dose values in the table have been calculated based on Regulatory Guide 1.109 parameters. A consumption l factor of 21 kg per year (Table E 5 of the Reg. Guide 1.109) for fish and 1 a dose factor for each radionuclide of interest in mrem per picocurie )
ingested (Tables E-11 through E-14 of the Reg. Guide 1.109) were used in j the calculations. These calculations represent assumptions that the
(T maximum individual (doses) are consecutive deviations above normal. It
( ,) should be recognized that these are non migratory marine species selected for accumulation purposes and are not popular for consumption.
14
[\- / TA8LE II-2 WHOLE 800Y INGESTION DOSE (mrem /yr)*
(ADULTS)
SONGS 1 Sheephead Black Perch Spiney lobster Sea Hare Co-58 -- -- -- 1.26 E-2 (Gi-LLi) (1.14 E-1)
Co-60 2.48 E-3 2.23 E-3 3.96 E-3 1.88 E-1 (Gi-LLi) (2.11 E-2) (1.94 E-2) (3.38 E-2) (1.61 E-0)
Ag-100m -- -- - --
(Gi-LLi)
Cs-134 -- -- -- --
(Liver)
Cs-137 1.16 E-2 2.37 E-2 1.41 E-2 --
(Liver) (1.76 E-2) (3.62 E 2) (2.15 E-2)
WHOLE 800Y INGESTION 00SE (mrem /yr)*
(ADULTS)
SONGS 2 AND 3 Black Spiney Bay Sheeohead Perch ODa' eve Lobster Sea Hare Mussel Co-58 -- -- 1.09 E.3 - 3.07 E-4 5.61 E-3 (Gi-LLi) (9.83 E-3) (7.29 E-3) (5.07 E 2)
Co-60 5.95 E-4 -- 3.87 E-3 2.78 E-3 1.30 E-2 1.68 E-2 (Gi-LLi) (5.07 E-3) (3.29 E-2) (2.36 E-2) (1.11 E-1) (1.44 E-1)
Ag -110m -- -- -- 1.11 E-5 -- --
(Gi-LLi) (7.61 E-3) i Cs-134 - -- - -- -- -
(Liver)
Cs-137 1.35 E 2 1.66 E-2 9.60 E-3 1.08 E -2 - 9.00 E 3 (Liver) (2.06 E-2) (2.54 E-2) (1.46 E-2) (1.64 E 2) (1.37 E 2)
- Numbers in parenthesis show the dose calculated to critical organ. Annual whole O body dose limit is 3 mrem (per reactor) per Technical Specifications.
organ dose limit is 10 mrem (per reactor) for the liquid effluent.
Critical
15
/~N.
PART B. Analysis of Shell and Bone To determine if there is any buildup of radionuclides in this environmental medium, fish, crustacea and mollusks were collected quarterly by each of the Station discharge outfalls and from a control location near Newport Beach. Afterwards, the bone portion of each marine animal was analyzed for three naturally-occurring radionuclides including potassium-40, radium 226 and thorium-228. The samples were also analyzed for 16 Station-related, gamma-emitting radionuclides including cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137. Finally, each sample was analyzed for strontium-90. The results of these analyses are summarized below for wet sample weights.
SONGS Unit 1. Sheephead:
Sheephead (fish) were collected near SONGS 1 during each quarter of 1985. Upon analysis, two radionuclides were detected in the bones of the fish, namely: potassium-40 and cobalt-60. Potassium-40 was detected in each set of samples.
Cobalt-60 was the only plant-related radionuclide detected in the Sheephead. Cobalt-60 was observed in the sample from the first quarter.
The concentration of cobalt-60 in the sample was 0.110 pCi/g of sample, p The levels of potassium-40 detected in the Sheephead samples from the (j Unit 1 outfall were comparable to the concentrations of potassium-40 measured in Sheephead from Newport Beach. Levels of cobalt-60 in the sample from SONGS Unit I was greater than the concentrations of cobalt-60 in the samples collected from the vicinity of Newport Beach.
These results indicate that the operations of SONGS had a detectable impact on this environmental medium.
SONGS Unit 1. Black Perch:
Black Perch, Pile Perch and Opaleye (fish) were collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only radionuclide detected in the bone portion of the samples.
The concentration of potassium-40 detected in the bones of the Black Perch were commensurate with the levels seen in samples from Newport Beach.
The only plant related radionuclide detected in the bones was cobalt-60.
The concentration of cobalt-60 was 0.071 in Pile Perch caught second quarter and 0.400 in Opaleye caught in the third quarter.
O
i 16
\ -
SONGS Unit 1. Crustacea:
Spiney Lobster (crustacea) were collected near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall during each quarter in 1984. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only naturally-occurring radionuclide detected in the samples.
Plant-related radionuclides, cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m, and cesium-137 were detected in the shell portion of the crustaceae.
Cobalt-60 was observed in samples collected throughout the year. The concentrations of cobalt-60 in these samples ranged from 0.013 to 0.058 pC1/g of sample, averaging 0.0342 pC1/g of sample.
The concentrations of potassium-40 in the samples collected from the SONGS Unit 1 outfall were commensurate with those seen in crustacea t collected near Newport Beach. Cobalt-60, however, was detectable in each l
set of samples from the SONGS Unit 1 outfall, it was consistently below detection limits in samples collected from Newport Beach. See i Fiaure 12a. Cobalt-58 was detected in a level of 0.007 pCi/g in the second quarter. Silver-110m was detected in one sample caught in the third quarter in a concentration of 0.0035 pCi/g. Cesium-137 was detectable in the second and fourth quarter samples in a concentration of 0.003 and 0.0064 pCi/g, respectively. (See Fiaure 12b) i These results indicate that the operations of SONGS had a detectable
("' impact on this environmental medium.
j O} SONGS Unit 1. Mollusks:
i Sea Hare were collected from SONGS Unit 1 throughout the year. Since Sea Hare do not possess any bones, these analyses are not applicable.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Sheechead:
Sheephead (fish) were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls on
! a quarterly basis during 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only
! radionuclide detected in the bone portion of the Sheephead.
The concentrations of potassium-40 measured in the Sheephead from the control location were commensurate with potassium-40 levels seen in Sheephead collected near Newport Beach.
The only Station-related radionuclides detected in the bone portions of 6 the Sheephead was cesium-137 with an activity of 0.005 pCi/g. It was concluded that Station operations had no detectable impact on Sheephead near SONGS.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Black Perch:
Black Perch, Barred Sand Bass and Opaleye (fish) were collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, potassium 40 was the only radionuclide detected in the samples.
(}
17 V The concentrations of potassium 40 measured in Black Perch from the control locations were commensurate with potassium-40 levels seen in Black Perch collected from Newport Beach.
Since no Station-related radionuclides were detected in the bone portions of the Black Perch, it was concluded that Station operations no no detectable impact on Sheephead near SONGS.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Crustacea:
Spiney Lobster (crustacea) were collected on a quarterly basis near the SONGS Unit 1 outfall through 1985. Upon analysis, potassium-40 was the only naturally-occurring radionuclide detected in the samples.
Plant-related radionuclides detected in spiney lobster included cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137. Cobalt-58 was detected in the sample from the second quarter at a concentration of 0.017 pCi/g of sample. Cobalt-60, on the other hand, was detected in samples from the first, second, third and fourth quarters at concentrations of 0.091, 0.060, 0.025 and 0.006 pCi/g of sample, respectively (Fiqure 13a).
The levels of potassium-40 measured in the samples from SONGS Units 2 and 3 were commensurate with those seen in samples collected from the control location. Concentrations of cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and p silver-110m, however, were detectable in each set of samples from the Q SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfall, where these same radionuclides were consistently below detection limits in samples collected from Newport Beach.
These data indicate that SONGS operations had a detectable impact on this environmental medium.
SONGS Units 2 and 3. Mollusks:
Bay Mussel was collected near the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls during each quarter in 1985. Upon analysis, only one naturally occurring radionuclide, potassium-40, was detected in the shell of the bay Mussel.
Cobalt _58 and cobalt-60 were the only plant-related radionuclides detectW in any of the samples. Cobalt-58 concentration was 0.070 pCi/g in the sample taken first quarter. Cobalt-60 was detected in samples from the first, second and third quarters at concentrations of 0.110, 0.044 and 0.025 pC1/g of sample, respectively (figure 13b).
Both cobalt-58 and cobalt-60 were detected in concentrations greater than those measured in Newport Beach.
These data indicate that the operations of SONGS had a detectable impact on this environmental medium.
O d 1
18
(~M i I
'v' I. Local Crops Representative leafy and fleshy crops were collected semi-annually from San Clemente Farms (which served as the indicator location) and from gardens situated Southeast of Oceanside (which serviced as the control station). After collection, the edible portion of the samples was analyzed quantitatively for a total of 12 gamma-emitting radionuclides including cesium-137 and iodine-131 via gamma-spectral analysis, as well as for tritium and radio-strontium by beta counting. The results of the analyses are summarized below for wet sample weights.
During 1985, tomatoes, cucumbers and cauliflower were collected from the San Clemente Farms. Upon analysis, the only radionuclide detected in the samples was potassium-40. Potassium-40 was detected in each of the samples. The concentration of potassium-40 in these samples ranged from 1.3 to 1.8 pCi/gm of sample, with an average concentration of 1.7 pCi/gm of sample.
The crops collected from the control location included string beans, squash and tomatoes for the first semiannual sampling, and kale and tomatoes for the second semiannual sampling. Potassium-40 was detected in each of the samples. The concentration of potassium-40 in the samples ranged from 1.5 to 1.8 pC1/gm of sample, with an average concentration of 1.7 pC1/gm of sample.
) for each of the sampling periods, the radionuclide concentratiens observed at the indicator locations were commensurate with data obtained from the control location, indicating that the operation of San Onofre had no detectable impact on this environmental medium. Although only environmental levels of radioactivity were detected in the samples, dose commitments to the maximum individual were performed for reference according to the method outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.109. The dose commitment to the maximum person was determined to be approximately 2.0 E-5 mrem per year.
J. Soil Samplina At the end of 1986, soil samples were collected from four indicator locations in the vicinity of SONGS, and a control location situated in Huntington Beach. After collection, each soil sample was analyzed for 12 naturally-occurring and Station related radionuclides via gamma-spectral analysis, and for radiostrontium by beta counting. These analyses )
indicated that three radionuclides were present in detectable quantities i in one or more of the samples, namely: potassium-40, cesium-131 and strontium-90. The findings are summarized below in terms of dry sample weights.
Potassium-40 was detected in each sample. The concentration of potassium 40 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged from 6.3 to 20 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 13.4 pCi/gm of sample.
O
(- J
19 O
6 4
\- / The concentration of potassium-40 in the sample from the control location was determined to be 19.0 pCi/gm of sample, which is similar to concentrations measured at the indicator locations.
Cesium-137 was detected in samples from two of the indicator locations.
Samples from indicator locations containing detectable amounts of cesium-137 were collected f rom Camp San Onof re, and f rom Old Route 101.
The concentration of cesium-137 in the sample from Camp San Onof re was determined to be 0.08 pCi/gm of sample. The amount of cesium-137 measured in the sample from Old Route 101 was significantly less. In this instance, the concentration of cesium-137 was determined to be 0.04 pC1/gm of sample.
Strontium-90 was found in samples f rom East Site Boundary, and Old Route 101. The concentration of strontium-90 in these samples was determined to be 0.02 and 0.03 pC1/gm of sample, respectively. Strontium-90 was not detected in the sample from Huntington Beach.
To determine the impact of SONGS on this environmental medium, it is important to determine the origin, amount and frequency of occurrence of the activity in the environment. Potassium-40, a naturally-occurring, non Station related radionuclide, was present as expected in quantities comparable to or less than the values obtained from the control location. The presence of cesium-137 in the soil may be attributable to fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and potentially from
(< ') gaseous effluents emitted from the Station. The source of the cesium-137
.is most likely due to fallout products of weapons testing. Strontium-90
.in soil samples may also be ascribed to the decay of fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and/or gaseous effluents emitted from the Station. Because strontium-90 was not detected in the samples from the control location, the detected activity in each of the samples may be accredited to Station operations. Since strontium 90 was seen at environmental levels (e.g., picocuries per gram of sample) in only half of the samples from indicator locations, the impact of Station is minimal on this environmental medium.
l K. KelD SamDlinq Kelp was collected semiannually from the San Onofre and San Mateo Kelp Beds, as well as from a kelp bed in Newport Beach. No samples were collected from the Barn Kelp bed in tho second semiannual period due to its unharvestable condition. Upon collection, the samples were analyzed by gamma-spectral analysis for 19 different station and non-station related radionuclides. The samples were also analyzed for both aqueous ;
and bound tritium. By the end of the year, potassium-40, iron.59, cobalt-60, iodine-131, and cesium-137 had been detected in one or more of the samples. The results of these analyses are summarized below in terms of wet sample weights.
/T ,
(s )
20 Potassium-40 was detected in each semiannual sample. The concentration of potassium-40 in the samples from the indicator locations ranged from 0.8 to 9.2 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 5.0 pCi/gm of sample. The concentration of potassium-40 in the samples from the control location were similar. Here, the concentration of potassium-40 ranged from 1.12 to 6.60 pC1/gm, with an average concentration of 4.54 pCi/gm of sample.
Iodine-131 was also detected in each of the kelp samples. The con:entration of iodine-131 in the samples f rom the indicator locations ranged from 0.013 to 0.054 pC1/gm, with an average concentration of 0.027 pCi/gm of sample. The concentration of iodine-131 in the samples from the control location was significantly higher. Here, the concentration of iodine-131 ranged f rom 0.018 to 0.058 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 0.038 pCi/gm of sample.
Cesium-137 was detected in each sample collected f rom the four indicator locations. The concentration of cesium-137 in the samples f rom the indicator locations ranged from 0.0016 to 0.0046 pCi/gm, with an average concentration of 0.0033 pCi/gm of sample. The concentration of cesium-137 in the semiannual kelp samples from the control location was below the lower limit of detection of 0.004 pCi/g. No cesium-137 was detected in the second semiannual sample collected from the control
)
location.
() Cobalt-60 was present in four samples from the indicator locations, but was not detectable in the samples from the control location. The
- concentration of cobalt-60 in the samples from the indicator locations 4
ranged from 0.0016 to 0.0042 pC1/gm with an average concentration of J 0.0013 pC1/gm of sample.
Cobalt-58 was not detectable in the semiannual samples. Finally, eo aqueous or bound tritium was found in any of the samples. Potassium-40 is a naturally-occurring radionuclide, which is not produced by Station J
operations. The cobalt-58, cobalt-60, iodine-131 and cesium-137 seen in samples from the incicator locations are most likely attributable to Station operations, considering differences in radionuclide concentrations betw2en indicator and control locations, and potential sources of these radionuclides in the environment.
! Because kelp from the San Onofre and San Mateo Ke'r, Beds were not harvested for comm3rcial uses in 1985, the radioactivity detected in the kelp samples is nct in the critical dose pathway to man. In light of this, the dose cor.mitment to members of the public during 1985 was negligible.
l l
1
. . . . - __ _-- - ._ _ ~ - - - _ - ~
21 III. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA:
For media, where enough data points are available, statistical analysis was performed. External radiation, air particulates, and drinking water were selected for this kind of analysis since detectable values of radiation were measured.
External Radiation:
In order to show the strong correlation between the indicator and control locacions, a regression analysis using the quarterly TLD data from 1979 to 1985 was preformed. The following locations were analyzed. (Figures 14 and 15) The results were:
r2 (Correlation Probability N* Coefficient) (D) 1 - Basilone Road vs. 28 0.818 P < 0.001 Huntington Beach 2 - Bluff vs. Huntington 28 0.887 P < 0.001 Beach 3 - San Clemente vs. 28 0.770 P < 0.001 Hunting Beach O 4 . Camp Pendleton vs.
Huntington Beach 28 0.910 P < 0.001 These data show that there is a strong correlation between the control and the indicator locations. A probability P < 0.001 means there is less than 0.1% change that such correlation could have occurred by chance.
A regression analysis was also performed to study the trend with time.
All indicator locations had negative slopes. The values are listed below:
San Clemente Camo Pendleton Basilone Road Bluff slope = m -0.348 -0.429 -0.493 0.390 The negative slope indicates that the environmental radiation levels have decreased gradually with time from 1981 to 1985.
O
22 Os To further interpret the data, a student t-test was also performed on these locations and t-values observed are:
t t (table value)
N* (observed) at P - 0.05 F Test F Table j
1 - Basilone Road vs. 28 1.715 1 2.052 1.176 1.900 Huntington Beach 2 - Bluff vs. 28 2.309 -+ 2.052 1.891 1.900 j Huntington Beach 3 - San Clemente vs. 28 4.161 1 2.052 1.728 1.900 Huntington Beach 4 - Camp Pendleton vs. 28 2.290 1 2.052 1 .531 1.900 Huntington Beach The t-values for the above locations that are outside of the range shown in the table indicate significant difference between the control and the indicator locations. The indicators mean radioactivity levels are significantly lower than the control. The F test, the ratio of variances i of the two sets of data yielded values listed in the table for the above locations, shows that the indicator locations are not significantly i
different from the control in their variances (i.e., F test < F Table).
Air Particulates:
A regression analysis was performed on four indicator locations versus I Huntington Beach from 1981 to 1985 to see if any significant correlation exists. The results of statistical analysis were:
r2 (Correlation Probability N* Coefficient) (D) i !
l City of San Clemente 20 0.924 P < 0.001 ,
vs. Huntington Beach l l
i Bluff vs. Huntington 24 0.374 P < 0.05 l Beach i 4
Mesa vs. Huntington 24 0.790 P < 0.001 Beach Camp Pendleton vs. 20 0.961 P < 0.001 Huntington Beach l
l O
I
23 O
V The results show the strong correlation (P < 0.005) between the indicators and the control location. The student t-test was performed I and the values were as follows: l l
s t t (table value)
N* (observed) at (P a 0.05) F Test F Table City of San Clemente 20 + 0.871 1 2.021 2.45 2.17 vs. Huntington Beach Bluff vs. Huntington 24 - 0.476 1 2.021 0.842 2.02 Beach Mesa vs. Huntington 24 - 1.612 1 2.021 1.391 2.02 Beach Camp Pendleton vs. 20 0.788 1 2.02 2.704 2.17 4 Huntington Beach The observe' t-values are greater than the table t-values indicating that there is ne significant difference between the control location of Huntington Beach and the indicators at P = 0.05 level.
/
Drinking Water:
The results of drinking water student t-test analysis are summarized
! below:
1 t t (table value) F Table N* (observed) at P - 0.05 F Test ( P - 0.05)
San Clemente Golf 12 - 5.975 1 2.074 0.417 2.82 Course vs. Control
! Tri-Cities MWD vs. 12 - 5.209 1 2.074 0.733 2.82 l Control These results indicate that there is significant difference at P - 0.05 level in the values obtained at the indicator and the control locations.
This difference is due to the natural origin of the water samples and seasonal and statistical variations.
- Number of observations O
t
24 t
f IV. CONCLUSIONS l Levels of radioactivity in environmental media depends on many
! components, including the following: ~ site release rates; meteorology; l number, location, size and date of nuclear weapons testing; seasonal )
variability of fallout; soil conditions; local terrain and variability in 1 the natural environment.
l 1
i Radiological environmental data collected throughout 1985 have been )
) evaluated to determine the impact, if any, of San Onofre operations on 1 the surrounding environment. To accomplish this, several methods of j evaluation were employed, namely:
i l (1) Compilation and verification of all data, as well as a l determination of those data considered to be significantly jl greater than background levels, (i.e., 1.25 times background
- levels for TLE direct radiation doses, and twice background levels for radionuclide concentrations).
a
! (2) Graphical exnmination of time-dependent variations of pertinent i
radioiostopes in selected environmental media throughout the I
year at both indicator and control locations.
l (3) Graphical comparison of gross beta radioactivity and specific long-lived gamma-emitters in various media in 1985 against the levels observed in pre-operational years.
] (4) Comparison of data against reportability levels contained in i the plant Technical Specifications (Table 11-3).
) (5) Projections of doses to members of the public resulting from i radionuclides measured in known pathways.
i i In comparing these findings to the conservatively-defined limits of the l facility operating licenses, it is concluded that the radiological I environmental impact of San Onofre Units 1, 2 and 3 operations through 1985 has been minimal, and the resulting dose to man is negligible.
i s
i i
I 1
l
!,O i
Y l,
TABLE II-3 COMPARISON OF MARIMUM RA010 ACTIVITY LEVELS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES VERSUS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (T.S.) REPORTING LEVELS Reporting Airborne Reporting Marine Re9orting Local Reporting Water Level % T.S. Particulates Level % T.S. Species Level % T.S. Crops Level % T.S.
(pC1/11ter) (pC1/cu.e) (pC1/g. wet) (pC1/g. wet)
H-3 -
2 x 104 - - - -
0.04 - -
Mn-54 -
1 x 103 - 30 - .
fe-59 - 4 x 102 - - -
10 . -
Co-58 - 1 x 102 - - -
0.36 (Flesh) 30 1.20 x 10-2 . . _
0.07 (Bone)
Co-60 - 3 x 102 -
1.90 (Flesh) 10 0.19 - -
0.40 (Bone)
Zn-65 -
3 x 102 - - - -
20 - - -
Zr-Nb-95 - 4 x 102 . . ..
i Ag-110m - - - - -
0.006 (Flesh) 8 7.50 x 10 4 - - -
0.009 (Bone)
I-131 - 2 -
1.510* 0.9 1.68 - -
0.100 -
Cs-134 - 30 - - 10 -
1 -
1 .
Cs-137 - 50 -
0.0020 20 1.00 x 10 4 0.0158 (Flesh) 2 7.90 x 10 -3 -
2 -
0.0064 (Bone) -
Ba-La-140 - 2 x 102 _ _ . . . , ,
- This value was observed in a sample taken within the site boundary and is not required by Technical Specifications.
N
26 I
f V. REFERENCES
- 1. Land Use Census for SONGS Units 2 and 3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, 1985 1
- 2. Land Use Census for SONGS Unit 1 Radiological Environmental ,
Monitoring Program, 1985 l 1
- 3. 00CM, "Offsite Dase Calculation Manual for SONGS Units 2 and 3," 1985
- 4. 00CM, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual for SONGS Unit 1," 1985
- 5. USNRC Oraft Regulatory Guide 4.8, " Standard Format and Principal Content of Environmental Technical Specifications," December 1975
- 6. USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.13, " Performance, Testing and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - Environmental Applications," 1977
- 7. USNRC Regulatory Guide 4.15 " Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs," Rev.1, February 1979
- 8. SONGS Unit 1 Provisional Operating License, OPR-13, Sections 3.18 and 4.18, effective prior te January 1, 1985
) 9. SONGS Unit 2 Operating License NPF-10, Section 3/4.12.1
- 11. U.S. Regulatory Guide 1.109, " Calculation of Annual Doses to Man From Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Revision 1, October 1977
- 12. Hugh D. Young, " Statistical Treatment of Experimental Data," McGraw Hill, 1962, 172 pp.
- 13. Lincoln L. Chao, " Statistics, Methods and Analyses," McGraw Hill, 1974, 556 pp.
/
APPENDIX A SAMPLE TYPE AND SAMPLING LOCATION 1
I l
l l .
i 1
A-2 l
\
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) DIRECTION
- Direct Radiation 59 SONGS Meteorological Tower 0.3 NW 67 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #2 0.4 NW 10 Bluff 0.8 NW 40 SCE Training Center - Mesa 0.8 NW 8 Noncommissioned Officers Beach Club 1.2 NW 34 San Onofre School 1.7 NW 9 Basilone Road /I-5 Freeway Offramp 2.0 NW 21 Concordia Elementary School - San Clemente 3.5 NW 20 S3n Clemente Pier 5.0 NW 1 City of San Clemente (S0G&E Offices) 5.6 NW
() 24 25 San Clemente High School Convalescent Home - San Clemente 6.0 8.0 NW NW 23 San Clemente General Hospital 8.2 NW 28 Doheny Fire Station - Capistrano Beach 9.5 NW 27 U.S. Post Office - Dana Point 10.5 NW 29 San Juan Capistrano Fire Station 10.8 NW 26 Dana Hills High School 11.0 NW 37 Laguna Niguel Fire Station 13.5 NW 30 Laguna Beach Fire Station 17.5 NW 32 Santa Ana Police Department 32.0 .NW 14 Huntington Beach Generating Station 37 NW 39 Basilone Road Trailer Park 1.4 NNW 19 San Clemente Highlands 5.0 NNW 31 Aurora Park Mission Viejo 18.6 NNW Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
1
A -3 TABLE A-1 (Continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS i
DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) DIRECTION
- Direct Radiation (Continued) 2 Camp San Mateo 3.5 N 33 Camp Talega 5.7 N 11 El Camino Training Annex (formerly visitors Center) 0.2 NNE 61 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #4 0.6 NNE 35 Range 312 (Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton) 4.7 NNE 12 South Edge of Switchyard 0.2 NE 62 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #5 0.7 NE 3 Camp San Onofre 2.6 NE 36 Range 208C (Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton) 4.0 NE 63 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #6 0.7 ENE 41 Old Route 101 - East 0.3 E 16 East Site Boundary 0.5 E 64 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #7 0.7 E 4 Camp Horno 4.5 E 42 Horno Canyon 4.6 E 44 Fallbrook Fire Station 18.0 E 15 East-Southeast Site Boundary 0.2 ESE 7 Old Route 101 - East-Southeast 0.5 ESE 66 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #9 0.8 ESE 65 Adjacent to Pressurized Ion Chamber #8 0.9 ESE 45 Interstate 5 Weigh Station 2.0 ESE 6 Old Route 101 - East-Southeast 3.0 ESE 5 C'mp a Las Pulgas 8.5 ESE 49 Camp Chappo 12.8 ESE Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
A-4
- s. TABLE A-1 (Continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) DIRECTION
- Direct Radiation (Continued) 48 Mainside (Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton) 15.0 ESE 52 Vista Fire Station 21 ESE 54 Escondido Fire Station 32 ESE 13 Site Boundary 0.13 SE 46 San Onofre State Beach Part 1.4 SE 38 San Onofre State Beach Park 3.6 SE 47 Camp Las Flores 8.6 SE 43 Edson Range (Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton) 10.6 SE 50 Oceanside Fire Station 15.5 SE 51 Carlsbad Fire Station 18.6 SE 53 San Diego County Operations Center 45 SE
(} 58 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 3) 0.1 S 57 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 2) 0.1 SSW 56 San Onofre State Beach (Unit 1) 0.1 W 55 San ONofre State Beach (Unit 1) 0.2 W 22 Coast Guard Station - San Mateo Point 2.7 WNW 17 Transit Dose - -
18 Transit Dose - -
60 Transit Control Storage Area - -
Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Unit 3 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north. -
A-5 TABi.E A-1 (Continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) DIRECTION
- Airborne 6 SONGS Meteorological Tower ** 0.3 NW i
1 City of San Clemente (City Hall) 5.5 NW 9 State Beach Par %** 0.4 ESE 3 Huntington Beach Generating Station 37 NW I
2 Camp San Onofre (Camp Pendleton)** 1.8 NE 11 MESA EOF 0.5 NNW 5 Units 2 and 3 Switchyard ** 0.13 ESE 10 Bluff 0.5 WNW
> 12 SONGS Evaporation Pond 0.4 NW-Soil Samples 3 Basilone Road /I-5 Freeway Offramp 2.0 NW 4 Huntington Beach Generating Station 37 NW 5 East Site Boundary 0.2 . NNW 1 Camp San Onofre 2.5
) NE 2 Old Route 101 - Southeast ',, 3.0 SE Ocean Water D Newport Beach 30 NW A Station Discharge Outfall - Unit 1 0.5 SW B Outfall - Unit 2 0.7 SW C Outfall - Unit 3 { 0.7 SW p *Distande(miles)andDidaction(sector)aremeasuredrelativetoUnits2and3 g midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
- Not required by Technical Specifications
A-6 O TABLE A-1 (Continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS l DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) DIRECTION
- Drinking Water 1 Tri-Cities Municipal Water District Reservoir 8.7 NW 3 Huntington Beach 37 NW 2 San Clemente Golf Course Well 3.5 NNW l
} Sediment from Shoreline (Beach Sand) 2 San Onofre Surfing Beach 0.9 NW 4 Newport Beach (North End) 30 NW 1 San Onofre State Beach 0.6 SE 3 San Onofre State Beach 3.5 SE Local Crops 1 San Mateo Canyon 2.6 NW 3
2 Southeast of Oceanside 22 -. SE
?!!
i i
- Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from cegrees true north.
. _ - . _ , . _ . -_, , . . _ . . _ . . . . . - . . - _ . _ _ _ - ~ , - - . , . - - _ _ , _ , _ , . , . _ _ , - -
A-7 O TABLE A-1 (Continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS DISTANCE
- TYPE OF SAMPLE AND SAMPLING LOCATION (miles) OIRECTION*
Non-Migratory Marine Animals C Newport Beach 30 NW B Units 2 and 3 Outfall 0.7 SSW A Unit 1 Outfall 0.6 WSW Kelp D Newport Beach 30 NW C Barn Kelp Bed 6.6 SSE A San Onofre Kelp Bed 1.5 S B San Mateo Kelp Bed 3.5 O WNW Ocean Bottom Sediments E Newport Beach 30 NW D Unit 3 Outfall 0.9 S C Unit 2 Outfall ,,
0.8 SSW l
A Unit 1 Outfall 0.5 W B Unit 1 Outfall 0.6 W
- Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
A-8 TABLE A-2 PIC-RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING LOCATIONS-SONGS 2/3 DISTANCE
- PRESSURIZED ION CHAMSERS THETA (DEGREES) METERS / MILES DIRECTION / SECTOR
- S1 San Onofre Beach 298 1070 0.665 WNW P S2 SONGS Evaporation Pond 313 890 0.553 NW Q S3 Japanese Mesa 340 1150 0.715 NNW R S4 MC8 - Camp Pendleton 34 1120 0.696 N A t
55 MCS - Camp Pendleton 19 1050 0.653 NNE B
- S6 MCB - Camp Pendleton 46 940 0.584 NE C S7 MCS - Camp Pendleton 70 870 0.541 ENE D S8 MCS - Camp Pendleton 986 1120 0.696 E E 59 San Onofre State Beach 121 940 0.584 ESE F O
l
- Distance midpoint. (meters / miles) and direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 & 3 Theta direction is determined from degrees true north. '
i O
1
A-9 TABLE A-3 SECTOR AND DIRECTION DESIGNATION FOR RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATION MAP DEGREES TRUE NORTH FROM SONGS 2 AND 3 MID-POINT NOMENCLATURE
$ector Center Sector 22.5 Limit Line Limit Sector a Direction
. 348.75 0 & 360 11.25 A N 11.25 22.5 33,75 B NNE l
33.75 45 56.25 C NE 56.25 67.5 78.75 0 ENE 78.75 90 101.25 E E 101.25 112 123.75 F ESE 123.75 135 146.25 G SE 146.25 157 168.75 H SSE 168.75 180 191.25 J S 191.25 202.5 213.75 K SSW 213.75 225 236.25 L SW j 236.25 247.5 258.75 M WSW 258.75 270 281.25 N W 1
1 281.25 292.5 303.75 P WNW 303.75 315 326.25 Q NW
- 326.25 337.5 348.75 R NNW
- Distance (miles) and Direction (sector) are measured relative to Units 2 and 3 midpoint. Direction is determined from degrees true north.
3104c O
l
3,;r v i
~ -- /
yt ;g "
- li i /
Ulf e / l (jil .^.
f 71 ,/ N,j,/
i, '
'/~ ff J
9 j:u /
./ i
$i, /
g y-f'Y_ X) jy
,.- ,/ ',e .
./ 'v '
' ' /
E -
N Falibrook p) N s b'j: y(M /
'F
[
{-
b / .. C.g' ,? {/.(.s i 0 ./ /'/> , ,c
/ . -
75
.l1 ' f'[
j i
\ , e, j-
\ ,,
ke h i '<
f~
j: * '
j
[ ')
Pend e on )
Marine Corps l "k
(
gg g Base o '
l: d e 6 dr W ua
.Nffi!]
i}:!7ya 1.s g .. m nH4:e Ni 'j $-4 ,
~
(,
j f
3 ;;.
ir .
k' '_ m % h xM 7
gj 'g San Onofre NGS i
di 1 w" y ,4 h h l G j .,
Ib j '
~
A,
A-
\\
R: vision 2 Merch 19,1986 Figuro A-1 l
, ).I,[
i "e' qk j.
o 1
- b 15 {(
+ 4 d <
i l
+ !, < .
T1
\ ', PERT W> I(! [
L CARD 6 p v- pi ,
gigo A a11alde On /h/
{
\<a'/ Apert tre Card '
6,ys~
[
! :]
1 .
( it.
) su't
' *v,9-l &3 .
t' / v> . , N ,
WJ %\ l p Escondido '7 p di l_ ,j!!
- x. , ) ~x 1-1s I-.
t'i 4,' ..;- 5 3 j y p
>._. N y j
- d. A.,? San
', .. Marcos I ! R 1 Vista %> s,
.y' l s LEGEND f .}
(. , , -
p, ,C RADIOLOGICAt ENVIR0hWENTAL MONiiORING ,,
,.~, saute t0cAu0Ns j j.} ';;*
g s .,
.n g
......,..~c,_., g 9 D eci n.di.ima , ),e I .J ' p. t c ,,,
,~ . >>z . .m. + ,.
)' Ly'7 ,
S (;.. ~~u p/v <. , ;
.. / ,4 se c.
i, , ,p
> J ; N. (-
, g ou- w w..
h ,yp N. N;g /\./ -
. N., .-/
. 3 o.s
+"~%**='s""'"""~'= f(, fii Jj l)
A y ../ 4) ,
. N..
,-c. 7g
-.3 s ..s .,
,. 7
,7 .N ~ T Keir r, s!
r_ -
lI / I';
- oce seein s.d nin j .,' sl i N k5d'-"-$~~ l
[ <" e# ..
s iij
)l b
Ocaanside.,[hCarlsba'd'k ^h.N. <
~
,,1 ,
i > x
~
w.
d'., , -
+
d_ ;
i p:
1 c.-
./
s' ) a
<' Leucad.ia N %
i(
1 y
h i
4 4
'4A / 11
%QCo@ OLkj
f f y? % ~. . . ,
%y [g / s/ / q .
d:;D, x .
,- \. .
(. t.
j N, N- . . , _ . . _
t _j j ,
%p
+y . y .h b _. . . .
/ - - j fflii ~.'g gf m' /
rd
't Q-
.s. .
e.
dl
}jl if'
.'x ' . .. } q
'.hI .
r .o# ,.
h
/
!!,i+@, -
' I, p ~,,r '
q Lijp j N
! j'f'\,f1,l'l. ,
ld gl[h<[,
. t < L.~. \ ..
(j' Y: ( , Ora ng e 't I\. rm.
4 S[ / %.r;.Q j", ' ' h, \., d , .i \
- ji s i T o \
b</ 3
$')
i
% i U
,( '
b \
\ )
's'\ i El Toro
.! ! /' -
\
MC'AS '
o:
\ >
.g t
a .
' ^
- ,..j' .
H
\,, .., l.S - k--.\ i a
- R
[
\
!!fJh.e C'4g N
/
TyE$ ,' ! '
c \
4fffj.
W
'N. - ,
, Santa N A na r ...'. .. J ,
/v N \ sos /
%:t3 dj .
i
(
'x
- b-1 o.* s e,f, f' ,
' q,,
t.. 3
- jk b
/
'\
- , . Y,r h ./
~ ijij i? .. .., ' t. es \ n N d N.
s' s . . . . ../ . c'
{Q 2,
,.rQ
' fl ;% / '
4'3jl \,
Costa /
J w
Ky 4: Mesa \
,.f.
,(' o (\
t i i '
Laguna lfy, . ' -
' $g 4 .s
\ f'
\
Q Beach lk- -
su 5[d- f,f pp g mesna muu am : N ewport Beac h """""" " #
T0 A- (
Figuro A,2 -' ]
k ion 2 Merch 19,1986 -
l
_.-s < ,
...- \ ;1 l g
\ li
,/
] f- l LEGEND j,i
\ RADIOLOGICAL INVIRONM[NIAL MONIIORING ?
H
) ,
'B $ AMPLE LOCATIONS
, Pressuria.d lon Chamber ,
i e o<.ci m di i.on l j' M -An { ;y
. [ so.1 IN !>
\ h ouen wmee Demning Waeer i
y 1,
j 4 Non-M yasory Ma<m. Aewmais l) g Loc.i Crops
- V a l. M]
A \,
, ;;; om.n . .. s..m...e
- ,,, s..m.n. ,,oe so..- n a
.p g
'\ .
./
\. ss -- -
.$ A i
v).] .
h s ), g I.id,
/ s qq s y N N.,
g arrt p cAnD yib i l s-
[
i f
Q /. L
- /
! wo AvaBa'ae ire Card On j
Q(p -}
(
l [4
^\ / s, .f . .
/
i.g n .
j
! 8~) @ .
San Juan
- . ~
' (q:f p
/ ' A.. (g'd 4$
h iCapistrano '" .. ' -
W[
.N x L .. , , -
c l
\
\
N ' '7 (
(
1
,,, N L km j, J dik \ agu\
W1 L na (
%x.\vg a'
- _- ifj
@ 9 NigueI 1
- - '%' J$Dm g. San Onofre
~ ll>.I' .
\
- San Clemente NGS
- ,,,,,, s.
h}
4 a' pa Dana Point W p
$1 p
K1 1, ; -
/ ; J, ,
If I %%9M644%oMk
~
' _4 '
I i[' ip kk
$w$ iW br
.pg ..
~
' ',%' f ,1. .aw n
h h hx it,L. i 3
..,p*'nr T 4;
. i,1,
'(s5:' $?jl
, TfD. ! $1 TE$ e ej 1I f' e
i 4p j '* f+
v; '%,
?
t- ,
- h. i R
}[f's l-o y.: ,
v'
- i. ; .4 x,k lb
$h 4 9: p ut! F l
vs
', [. if i.! j w.4::/ll ,
h,l sp 29S Aa V 5b -
x, &'rh C T:
((;. 8 if w'\
..,t.W,J, jk)63 f.,nIli
'E eI p$
3};,2.ef
)(,d r; h
V~ f .
7.i[h:\
n I} O
.O A .
i.m.,;mk
.o ca4 5I[,g[h.!I ,t l(t~., yd rMI
- Qf}tLit 31 [,it a e qq e
If
$.s .*, o 8
i 6 sy . ,y, .
i (Cf. t 1
!U$4(/{ np li 7G *.' It ff
/ i,b if el,h.'hah *
', O[ ya. tj
,d vgAphlt f
ir w.,)
h
- hldi
' tl SMJ f
,[44 .m
- p;/,. .M F U h,4. .
. Il} J C 1, E
,. O @ , e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. n_
Figura A-3 I 1
R vision 2 M::rch 19,1986 a igg h
B C
D
& W t
A h~
A N
, E p
/ lJ l%
- ?,!
I L F $
q* h . .' : ' ' '-
i .if'
, #\' ' 2' g
G h
G* :sd , je k n h+
San Onofre ((
"mes b 'W ' ' '
h iuit li,1f State Beach EF8 q s
" t um p :
jl[{;;
h k.a.
- As Also Availal>}e 01 g p
p -
- ,,erwcc ur, H ..
4 IO '
I i; SCALE g+\ o % % 1 MILE e
\% N g iI.
N O 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 FEET tJ f
l ll.
't LEGEND RADIOLOGICAL [NVIRONM[NIAL MONITORING jf ,
5 AMPLE [0CAfl0N$ .
, j Pressueued ion Chambee
) ,1. m L . Oweet fla.einen
- a p.
[ 54 4 k
h Ocean Weree '[jeM y Demkeg Wo.ee n . n. . , e .. . ;:) r.
g L.c i crops V un .N
{, ' .
, e .....m e.- ..
2,.._......-
a3 g,
ie
%OL1404tl'034$
t 1
I i
l i
}
APPENDIX B i
! PROGRAM DATA
SUMMARY
FOR 1985 l
l i
1 l
l J
a l
l 4
l I
1 l
l 1
i s
i i
l s
i 4
B-Qa LIS1 0F TABLES 1
PROGRAM DATA
SUMMARY
FOR 1985 Table Number Pace la Quarterly Gamma Exposure B -1 lb Annual Gamma Exposure B-2 2 Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity B-3 3 Weekly Radiciodine I-131 Activity B-4 4a Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamms 0-5 j Spectral Analysis 4c Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross B-7 Alpha and Strontium Activities 5 Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis B-8 6 Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectra Analysis B -10 7 Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity B-11 9a Monthly Drinking Water Analysis B--12 9b Monthly Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha and Gross B-14 Beta Activities
]
j 9c Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Alpha and Gross B-15 i Beta Activities 9d Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha B -16 and Gross Beta Activities 1
9e Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysis B-17 10 Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis B -19
- 11 Semi-Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis B-22 j
l 12a Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Flesh) B-25 12b Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone) B-46 1
O l
', B-Ob
}
4 i '
f LIST OF TABLES (Cont.)
! PP.0 GRAM OATA
SUMMARY
i FOR 1985 I
,i i Table Number Page i
!, 13a Semi-Annual Local Crops Gamma Spectral Analysis B-63 i
j 13b Semi-Annual Local Crops Tritium and Strontium Activities B-71 l 14 Annual Soil Analysis B-73 f 15 Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis B-75 l 1
l i
4
$ i l
t i
P P
i l
I
O O O 07APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPMARY SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING $TATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to Becember 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean[f) Meantf) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table la Dfract Radiation Guarterly Composite (ml111res)
Gamma Exposure 268 5.0000 20.413(262/264) Meteorlogical 42.475[ 4e 43 22.6[ 4e 41 0
( 9.400- 103.6) Tower - SONGS (21.300- 103.61 (21.100-23.7001 0.3 el. HW Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 should apply to pages B-1 through B-77
- T
07APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE'HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table Ib Direct Radiation Annual composite taillfrem)
Gamma Exposure 67 5.0000 85.6611 64/ 66) Meteor 1 osteal 174.8( 1/ 13 98.9( 1e 11 o (36.800- 174.8) Tower - SONGS ( 174.8- 174.8) (98.900-98.9001 0.3 al. HH e G. e :
_._._ ~ .- -. - - - - - -
T ~
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PR0f. RAM SuretARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l
Docket No. 50-361 j San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 d
Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of 1 Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine l Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Meantf)
Name. Distance Mean(f ) Reported
! of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements
! Table 2 Airborne Weekly Composite
{ (PCl/cu. el 4
I Gross meta 477 0.0010 0.0200(423/424) 0.0235( 53/ 53) 0.0205( 53/ 53) 0
)- ( 0.010- 0.068) Mesa E.O.F. ( 0.011- 0.048) ( 0.010- 0.071) 0.5 ml. NHW 1
I i
1 1
f w
1
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Meanif) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 3 Airborne Weekly Composite (PCl/cu m)
I-131 477 0.0400 0.3733t 9/424) NE Site Boundary 0.8550( 2/ 53) (LLD ( 0/ 53) 0
( 0.050- 1.510) Visitors Center ( 0.200- 1.5101 0.2 al. NNE O G. 9
O 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 i San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 d Type and Lower Llett All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Meanif) Reported
. of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements i Table 4a
- Airborne l Guarterly Composite 1 (PC1/cu. m) j An-110m 36 0.0020 <LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
! se-7 36 0.0060 0.1072( 32/ 32) 0.1152( 4/ 4) 0.1105( 4/ 41 0 4
( 0.G67- 0.147) Mesa E.O.F. ( 0.073- 0.147) ( 0.096- 0.131) 0.5 ml. HD64 Ce-141 36 0.0040 <LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD (' 0/ 4) 0 i
Ce-144 36 0.0050 (LLD I 0/ 32) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 l,
j Co-58 36 0.0020 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 r
Co-60 36 0.0020 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 1
Cs-134 36 0.0010 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Cs-137 36 0.0010 0.0020( 1/ 32) 0.0020( 1/ 41 <LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
( 0.002- 0.002) stuff ( 0.002- 0.002) 0.5 ml. NNN K-40 36 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL (LLD ----- *
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 T.
-_ - - _ _ _ - - _ -_- -___--__-__ --_--)
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported Cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 4a Airborne Quarterly Composite (PC1/cu. m)
Ru-103 36 0.0040 <LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 ZrlHb)-95 36 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 O G. G :
4 09APRS6 l ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
J Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medium or Pathway Total Number of Number of Sampled (Unit Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame. Distance Mean(f) of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range Mean( f ) Reported and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 4c Airborne quarterly Composite
- (PCl/cu. a)
Gross AIPha 36 0.0003 (LLD ( 0/ 32) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0
) Sr-90 36 0.0010 (LLD ( Of 32) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 i
I
~
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL r10NITORING PROGRAM StJPflARY SAH ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Dociret No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 TVPe and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humbcr of Medius or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Hase, Distance Mean(f) of Measurement)
Meanif) Mean(f) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 5 Ocean Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1)
As-110m 48 10 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O Ce-141 48 15 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O Ce-144 48 20 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O Co-57 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O Co-58 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Co-60 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Cs-134 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Cs-137 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Fe-59 48 20 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Y
O O O 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator 83 cation Mlth Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Number of Sampled (Unit Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine of Analyses Detection Mean(f )
of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 5 \
Ocean Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1)
K-40 48 20 322.5( 36/ 36) 325( 12/ 121
( 290- 360) Newport Beach 325( 12/ 12) 0
( 280- 350) ( 280- 350 )
30 al. NH Mn-54 48 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Ko(TcJ-99m 48 2000 (LLD ( 0/ 36) 'ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 123 0 Ra-220 48 15 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Ru-203 48 15 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 123 0 Ru-106 48 30 (LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 123 0 Th-228 48 20 <LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O s
2n-65 48 20 <LLD ( 0 / 36) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Zr(Nbl-95 48 15 <LLD ( 0/ 36) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 123 0
- T e
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM SUMMARif SAH OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortinS Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 i Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Humber of Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Control Locations Honroutine cf Measurement)
Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 6 ccean Water al-Monthly Composite (PC1/1)
Gross Beta 24 100 847.22( 18/ 18) Station Discharge 895( 6/ 63 878.33E 6/ 63
( 500- 1400) Outfall - Unit 1 0 0.5 ml. SW
( 500- 1400) ( 720- 13001 O
G G. #
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
! TVPe and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Number of Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Control Locations Nonroutine of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range Mean(f) Meanif) Reported and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 7 Ocean Water euarterly Composite i
(PCl/1) .
Telttum 16 100 (LLD ( 0/ 12) ALL <LLD -----
(Lt.D ( 0/ 41 0
=
4 f
i 4
H
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California R'ePorting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Humber of Medium or P&thway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine SrePled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 9a KrInking Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1)
As-1'.0a 36 10 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O B e-7 36 50 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 123 0 Ce-141 36 15 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Ce-144 36 20 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Co-58 36 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 Co-60 36 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 12) O Cs-134 36 6.0000 (LLD I 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) O Cs-137 36 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 H-3 36 100 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0
C O .
! 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
j SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361
! San Die 90 county, California j RePortins Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Nith Numbs.r of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detectton MeantfI Name. Distance Meantf) Meantf) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements 1
Table 9a Drinking Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1) l I
R u-103 36 15 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 4
1 ZetHb)-95 36 15 (LLD ( 0/ 24) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 123 0
)
l l
l l
i l
I 1
0
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Ormpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Hame, Distance Mean(f) Meantf) Mean(f) Reported ct Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 9b Drinking Water Monthly Composite (PCl/1)
Gross A1Pha 36 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 24) 0.2000( 1/ 12) 0.2000( a/ 12) 0 Huntington Beach 37 al. NW
( 0.200- 0.2001 ( 0.200- 0.200)
Gross Beta 36 0.1000 0.3737( 19/ 24) Tri-Cities Munic. 0.4273( 11/ 12) 0.2556f 9/ 123 0
( 0.200- 0.700) Water Dist. Res. ( 0.200- 0.700) ( 0.200- 0.400) 8.7 al. HW O G- O ;
L l
i 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 TYPE and Lower Limit All Indicator Location MIth Number of 1 Medium or PathMay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine
- Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detact1on Meantf) Name, Distance Meantf) cf Measurement) Meantf1 RePortad
! Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9c Drinking Water Monthly Composite (PCl/11 l
Gross A1Pha 36 3.0000 8.0000( 1/ 241 San Clemente 8.0000( 1/ 12) <LLD ( 0/ 12) 0 j
( 8.000- 8.000) Golf Course Well ( 8.000- 8.0001 3.5 ml. NHW Gross Seta 36 0.5000 11.333( 24/ 24) San Clemente 12.083( 12/ 12) 6.5833( 12/ 12) 0
( 7.000-18.000) Golf Course Well ( 9.000-18.000) ( 4.000-10.000) 3.5 ml. NNW a
1 i
i 1
l l m l h
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location ulth Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Meantf) cf Measurement) Mean(f ) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 9d Irinking Water Quarterly Composite (PCl/1)
Gross Alpha 12 0.2000 0.2000( 1/ 8) San Clemente 0.2000( 1/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 0.200- 0.200) Golf Course Well ( 0.200- 0.2003 3.5 ml. HHW Gross Beta 12 0.1000 0.3200( 5/ 81 Tel-Cities Munic. 0.3333[ 3/ 43 0.2500( 2/ 41 0
( 0.200- 0.600) Hater Dist. Res. ( 0.200- 0.600) ( 0.200- 0.300) 8.7 al. HH
l O 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM StJP91ARY
- SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 l San Diego County, California j Reporting period
- January 01, 1985 to Decesser 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detectton Mean(fI Hame, Distance Meanff) Meantf) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Neasurements l Table 9a Drinking Water
., Quarterly composite (PCl/1)
As-110m 12 15 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
-l Se-7 12 100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 I
] Ce-141 12 60 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i Ce-144 12 20 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Co-58 12 10 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Co-60 12 6.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
! Cs-134 12 6.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 t
Cs-137 12 6.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Gross Alpha 12 3.0000 8.0000( 1/ 8) San Clemente 8.0000( 1/ 41 (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 8.000- 8.000) Golf course Well ( 8.000- 8.000) 3.5 ml. NNW l T C
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADICLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
S AN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Cocket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medlus or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection MeantfI Hame Distance Mean[f) Mean(f 3 Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 9e Drinking Water Quarterly Composite (PC1/1)
Gross Beta 12 0.5000 11.75( 5/ 8) San Clemente 13.5( 4/ 4) 8.7500( 4/ 41 0
( 7.000-17.000) Golf Course Well (10.000-19.000) ( 6.000-10.000) 3.5 ml. HHW H-3 12 100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 Rus103 12 25 (LLD ( O/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Zr[Nb)-95 12 30 <LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 9 9 9 ;
I i j
] 09APRS6 ENVIR004tENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPDIARY
$AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION j Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llett All Indicator Location ulth Medium or pathway Total Number Number of Sampled (Unit of Analyses of Locations Meantf1 Highest Annual Mean control Locations Monroutine of Measurement) performed Detection Name Distance Mean(f) Meantf) Reported (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements j Table 10
- shoreline sediment .
d Semi-Annual Composite j (pct /s) 1 As-110e 8 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 i
j Co-141 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 l Co-144 8 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 .
Co-57 8 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 l 1 !
i i co-58 . 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD- ( 0/ 21 0
\
l !
l Co-60 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD 1
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 ,
i 1 cs-134 4 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 l .
j Cs-137 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 61 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 i
Fe-59 8 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 !
l i
I
{
i i
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortins period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Hame, Distance Mean(f) of Measurement)
Meantf) Mean(f) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ranae Measurements Trble 10 shorellne sediment Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/3)
I-131 5 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 K-40 8 2.0000 12.3331 6/ 61 HeWPort Beach 16.05( 2/ 2) 16.05( 2/ 2) 0 (10.500-13.400) (North End) (15.200-16.900) (15.200-16.900) 30 al. NW Mn-54 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Mo(Tcl-99m 8 300 (LLD I 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Ra-226 8 0.1000 0.3600( 6/ 61 HeWPort Beach 0.5150( 2/ 21 0.5150( 2/ 23 0
( 0.150- 0.720) (North End) 30 al. NH
( 0.510- 0.520) ( 0.510- 0.520)
Ru-103 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Ru-106 8 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Th-228 8 0.1000 0.4300( 6/ 6) HeWPort Beach 1.7050( 2/ 21 1.7050( 2/ 2) 0
( 0.200- 1.050) (North End) 30 al. NW
( 1.410- 2.000) ( 1.410- 2.Q00 )
Zn-65 8 0.2000 (LLD I 0/ 6) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 0 9 9 r.
O
09ApR84 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPetARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION 1
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Mith Number of Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 10
! Shoreline sediment Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/s)
]!
j e
] Ze(Hb)-95 8 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 6) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 i
i l
I i ,
)
t 4
.(
1
[
1 i
~ cn b
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Die 30 County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations H13 hest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Meanff) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 11 Ocean Botton Sediments Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/3)
As-110m 10 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) O Ce-141 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) O Ce-144 10 0.1500 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 Co-57 10 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD - - - -
(LLD ( 0/ 2) O Co-58 10 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) O Co-60 10 0.0400 0.0900f 1/ 81 0.09001 1/ 23 0.0900( 1/ 2) 0
( 0.090- 0.090) Newport Seach ( 0.090- 0.090) ( 0.090- 0.090) 30 al. HM Cs-134 10 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 23 0 Cs-137 10 0.0400 <LLD ( 0/ SI ALL <LLD - - - -
(LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Fe-59 10 0.1500 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD - - - -
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 9 9 O g
O 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SuretARY i
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California -
Reporting Periods January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Monroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detectton MeantfI Hame. Distance Meantf1 Meantf) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 11 0::ean Sottom Sediments Semi-Annual Composite (PC1/31 i
1 I-131 10 0.4000 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD - - - -
(LLD ( 0/ 23 0 I
K-40 10 1.5000 10.85( 8/ 81 12.25( 2/ 2) 12.It 2/ 21 0
( 6.800-14.100) Unit 2 Outfall (10.400-14.100) (10.100-14.100) 0.8 al. SSW Mn-54 10 0.0400 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD <LLD ( 0/ 21 0 s
Mo(Tci-99m 10 230 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 i
Ra-226 10 0.0800 0.4112( 8/ 81 0.5450( 2/ 21 0.1350( 2/ 21 0
( 0.220- O.5801 Unit 1 Outfall 0.5 ml. W
( 0.510- 0.5801 ( 0.100- 0.170) l Ru-103 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Ru-106 10 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 21 0 Th-228 10 0.0800 0.5787f 8/ 81 0.7650( 2/ 2) 0.1350( 2/ 21 0 l
( 0.260- 0.9501 Unit 1 Outfall 0.5 ml. W
( 0.580- 0.950) ( 0.100- 0.1701 i
Zn-65 10 1.5000 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 2) 0 7
l' O
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL v10NITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
S AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San DieSo County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower lait All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sample 1 (Unlt of Analyses Detectton MeantfI Hame D1 stance Meantf3 MeantfI Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 21 Ocean Botton Sediments Sest-Annca1 Composite (PCl/3)
Zr(Hbl-95 10 0.0800 (LLD ( 0/ El ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ El 0 O G G .
4 j
i 09APRS6 ENVIRONPtENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM supstARY j
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 !
san Diego County, California l Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
)
Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of
) Medium or pathway Total Numbea of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f3 Name. Distance Mean(f) Reported 1 Meanff) of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a
{ Non-Migratory Marine euarterly Composite f (PCl/3) (flash typal j bay mussel Ag-110m 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD ~~
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 1
1 bay mussel Ce-141 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 9/ 3) ALL (LLD --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 j bay mussel Ce-144 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD <LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
l bay mussel Co-58 3 0.0100 0.0860( 2/ 33 0.0860( 2/ 3) <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.012- 0.160) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.012- 0.160) 0.7 al. $$N d
bay mussel co-60 3 0.0070 0.0730( 3/ 33 j 0.0730( 3/ 3) <LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 0.021- 0.170) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.021- 0.1701 0.7 al. ssN I
bay mussel Cs-134 3 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD - -
<LLB ( 0/ 01 0
)
bay mussel Cs-137 3 0.0030 0.0060( 1/ 33 0.0060( 1/ 3) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.006- 0.006) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.006- 0.006) 0.7 al. ssN l
hay mussel Fe-59 3 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 4
03
09APRS6 ENVIROM ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California l Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 l Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Mean(f) Meanif) Reported of Measurement) Performad (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Trble 12a Hon-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type) bay mussel H-3 Aqueous 3 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel H-3 Bound 3 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 .
bay mussel I-131 3 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel K-40 3 0.2000 1.2267( 3/ 31 1.2267( 3/ 3) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.980- 1.7001 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.980- 1.7003 0.7 al. SSW bay mussel Mn-54 3 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -- -
(LLD '( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Mo(Tc)-99m 3 10 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Ra-226 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD --
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ru-103 3 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ru-106 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 9 9- 9 ;
I 1 09APRS4 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIDLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SupetARY SAN ONDFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH I
Docket No. 50-361 San Blego County, California
) ReportinS period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
! Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine l Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meant") Hame. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements ,
i i
Table 12a '
Mon-Migratory Marine I euarterly Composite l IPCl/3) (flesh typel bay mussel Th-228 3 0.0300 (LLB ( 0/ 31 ALL 4LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Zn-65 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 03 0 bay mussel Zr(Nbl-95 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD --
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Clack perch A9-110e 8 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD <LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
black perch Ce-144 8 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 43 0 I
1 Clack perch Co-57 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD ----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 I
Clack perc.5 Co-58 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 I
Clack perch Co-60 8 0.0070 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD <LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 4
~
N
09APRS6 ENVIROFR1 ENTAL RADIDLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPflARY SAH ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortins Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hame. Distance Meantf) Meanff) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type)
Clack perch Cs-134 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 Clack perch Cs-137 8 0.0030 0.0069( 4/ 43 0.0082( 2/ 23 0.0052( 2/ 41 0
( 0.005- 0.011) Units 2/3 ssuOutfall ( 0.005- 0.011) ( 0.003- 0.007) 0.7 al.
Clack perch Fe-59 3 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -
(LLD ! O/ 41 0 Clack perch H-3 Aqueous 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD --
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch H-3 Sound 8 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -~
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch I-131 3 0.2000 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch K-40 8 0.2000 2.3750( 4/ 41 2.8750( 4/ 41 2.8750( 4/ 41 0
( 2.100- 2.800) Newport 8each ( 2.200- 3.8001 ( 2.200- 3.8001 30 al. Nu black perch Mn-54 8 0.0103 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 Clack perch Mo(Tc)-993 8 10 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD ----
(LLC ( 0/ 43 0 9 G- G ;
. - -.-. ~. - .- _ - - ~_- - - - - - . . - -
}
I 094pmS6 ENWIRGISOENTAL BASIOLOGICAL NDNITORINS PROGRAN SlSetARY t SAN ONOFRE 9tELEAR GENERATING STATIGN '
t Docket No. 50-361
- San Blege County, California Reporting periods January 01, 1985 to pocaster 31, 1985 Type and Lauer Llett AIX IneIcator Location ulth Nuoher of teedlem er pettiuey Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection pesan(f ) Name, Distance control Locattene Monroutine plean(f ) pesanif ) Reported of seemeurement) Performed (LLB) Range and Strection Range Range Measurements i
Table 12a NorHligratory fearine Ouarterly Composite !
- (PC1/3) (flesh type) '
4 black perch Ra-226 3 0.0300 (LLB ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLS -
(LLB ( 0/ 43 0 1
I
) black perch Ru-103 8 0.0300 (LLB ( 8/ 43 ALL <LLS (LLS ( 0/ 4) 0
}
l i black perch Re-106 8 0.0700 (LLB ( S/ 43 ALL (LLS ~~
(LLB ( 0/ 43 0 1
i r
black perch Th-228 8 0.0300 (LLS ( S/ 4) ALL <LLS <LLS ( 0/ 43 0 i
]
hiack perch 2n-65 'S 0.0700 <LLB ( 0/ 4) ALL 4LLB <LLB ( 0/ 43 0 black perch 2rtsch)-95 3 0.0300 (LLB ( 0/ 43 ALL <LLS <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet AP110m 4 0.0700 <LLS ( 9/ 0) ALL <LLB (LL3 ( 0/ 4) 0 keghole lleret Co-141 4 0.0700 (LLS ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLB (LLS ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet Co-144 4 0.0700 <LLS ( S/ 01 ALL (LLS -
<LLB ( 0/ 41 0 I
1 i co
~
b
09APR36 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llatt All Indicator Location ulth Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Maan Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Meantfl Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marina Quarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flesh typel keyhole llapet co-57 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 keyhole limpet Co-58 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole llapet Co-60 4 0.0070 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole llapet Cs-134 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole liepet Cs-137 4 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet Fe-59 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet H-3 Actueous 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD ----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet H-3 Bound 4 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole llapet I-131 4 0.2000 <LLD I 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 9 G- O ;
{
\
i.
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SIDDIARY
$AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIGN Docket No. 50-361 '
San Blego County California [
Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llett All Indicator Location with Number of j Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine i Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detect 1on Mean(f3 Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f 3 Reported of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements t
Table 12a Mon-Migratory Marine euarterly Composite (PC1/gl (flesh typel keyhole lieret K-40 4 0.2000 (LLB ( 0/ 01 1.0425( 4/ 4) 1.0425( 4/ 43 0 Newport Seach ( 0.880- 1.190) ( 0.880- 1.190) 30 al. NH keyhole limpet Mn-54 4 0.0100 (LLD ( C/ 0) ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole llapet Mo(Tc)-99m 4 10 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD --
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 .
keyhole 11apet Ra-226 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD (LLB ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet Ru-103 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole llupet Ru-106 4 0.0700 (LLB ( 0/ 03 ALL <LLD <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole llupet Th-228 4 0.0300 (LLB ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 keyhole limpet 2n-65 4 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole lieret Zr(Nhl-95 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0
?
M
1 09APRS6 ENVIROpetENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM StJMMARY
$AN ONOFRE PR3 CLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 San Dieso County, California Reportins period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medium or pattsday Total Humber of Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine Sampled tunft of Analyses Detection Maantfl of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a h Miscatory Marine Guarterly composite (PCl/33 (flesh typel opaleye A3-110m 3 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL (LLD <LLD ( 0/ 01 0 .
opaleye Ce-141 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD <LLD ( 0/ 03 0 opaleye Ce-144 3 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleys Co-57 3 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
opaleye Co-58 3 0.0100 0.0310f 1/ 33 0.0310( 1/ 21 <LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 0.031- 0.031) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.031- 0.031) 0.7 al. SSW opaleye co-60 3 0.0070 0.0277( 3/ 31 0.0380( 2/ 21 (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.007- 0.039) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.037- 0.039) 0.7 al. SSW opaleye Cs-134 3 0.0100 4LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD -
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye Cs-137 3 0.0030 0.0079( 3/ 31 0.0131( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.004- 0.013) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.013- 0.0131 0.6 al, usu opaleye Fe-59 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD -
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 e G G .
1 4
09APRS6 ENVIR0009 ENTAL R ADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLDMARY i 5AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Blege County California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llelt All Indicator Location ulth Number of Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Meanif) Reported of Measurement) performed (LLB) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine
]
i euarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flesh type) a l l 1 opaleye H-3 Amseous 3 3.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 l
i 1
opaleye N-3 Dound 3 3.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
opaleye I-131 3 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD (LLD I 0/ 01 0 opaleye K-40 3 0.2000 2.3133( 3/ 3) 2.7000f 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 1.440- 2.700) Unit 1 Outfall ( 2.700- 2.700) a 0.6 ol. WsW l
opaleye nn-54 3 0.0100 (LLB ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD ---
(LLB ( 0/ 01 0
> opalaye Mo(Tcl-99m 3 10 (LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL (LLD --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opalays Ra-226 3 0.0300 <LLB ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD (LLD ( 0/ 03 0 opaleye au-103 3 0.0300 (LLB ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD -
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye au-106 3 C.0700 (LLB ( 0/ 31 ALL (LLD -
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 en
i l
09APR 86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL ttDNITORING PROGRAM SIR 9tARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San DieSo County, California RePortin5 Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 TYPE and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locattors Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Meantf) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCI/s) (flesh type) opaleye Th-228 3 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 31 ALL <LLD - - - -
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opalaye 2n-65 3 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD --
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 oPaleye ZrtNbl-95 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD - --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Pfle Perch A3-110m 1 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Pile perch Ce-141 1 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Pfle Perch Ce-144 1 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Pfle Perch Co-57 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 13 ALL <LLD (LLD I 0/ 03 0 Pfle Perch co-58 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 PIIe Perch Co-60 1 0.0070 0.0230( 1/ 11 0.0230( 1/ 1) <LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 0.023- 0.023) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.023- 0.023) 0.6 ml. WSW G G G ?
1 i i f
I t
1 09APRS6 ENVIROpetENTAL RADIOLOGICAL rtDNITORING PROGRAM SurelARY 1
$AN ONOFRE 3GJCLEAR GENERATING STATIGN i
l Docket No. 50-361
} San Blege County, California !
Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 j Type and Louer Limit All Indicator Location ulth Number of ptodium or pathway Total Number of Locations Nighest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Name Distance Mean(f) Plean(f ) Reported j of pleasurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements i
Table 12a
- Mon-Migratory Marine j euarterly composite 1 (PCl/3) (flesh type) l,
{ plie perch Cs-134 1 0.0100 (LLS ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD ---
(LLD I 0/ 01 0 l
i plie perch Cs-137 1 0.0030 0.0158( 1/ 11 0.0154( 1/ 1) <LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 '
! ( 0.016- 0.016) Unlt 1 Outfall J
( 0.016- 0.016) 0.6 ml. MSN l
j plie perch Fe-59 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 13 ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0
) plie perch N-3 Aagueous 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLB (LLD ( 0/ 03 0 plie perch N-3 Dound 1 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD ---
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 1
i plie perch I-131 1 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -
(LLB ( 0/ 01 0 i i
plie perch K-40 3 0.2000 2.7000( 1/ 1) 2.7000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 4
( 2.700- 2.700) Unit 1 Outfall ( 2.700- 2.700) j 0.6 of. NEN l plie perch Mn-54 1 0.0100 (LLB ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLB (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ;
i plie perch Mo(Tc)-99m 1 10 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD - --
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 l
u G
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortinS Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medium or Pathway Total Humber Number of of Locations Hishest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection heantf) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 12a Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/s) (flesh type) plie perch Ra-226 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 plie perch R u-103 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 plie perch Ru-106 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 Pile Perch Th-228 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 Pile Perch Zn-65 1 0.0700 (LLD I 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 plie perch Zr(Hbl-95 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ ?) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 sand bass As-110m 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Ce-141 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 sand bass Ce-144 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD ---
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 9 9 9 ;
1 09APRS6 ENVIR0! MENTAL RADIO *.0GICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Cocket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine S*:mpled (Unlt of Analyses Detectton MeantfI Hame. Distance Meantf) Meantf3 Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD1 Range and Directton Range Range Measurements Ttble 12a Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type) ccnd bass Co-57 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 j
c;nd bass co-58 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 01 0 u nd bass Co-60 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
) sand bass Cs-134 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Cs-137 1 G.0030 0.0054( 1/ 13 0.0054( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.005- 0.005) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.005- 0.005) 0.7 al. SSW cend bass Fe-59 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ II A'. L (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 a
cend bass H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 u nd bass H-3 Bound 1 3.0000 (LLD ! 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 etnd bass I-131 1 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
t ,
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period Jandary 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Srapled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 12a Non-Migratory Marine Cuarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flash type) ecnd bass K-40 1 0.2000 2.3000( 1/ 11 2.3000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( C/ 01 0
( 2.300- 2.300) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 2.300- 2.300) 0.7 al. SSW ccnd bass Mn-54 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ccnd bass Mo(Tc)-99m 1 10 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 01 0 ccnd bass Ra-226 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD ----a (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ecnd bass Ru-103 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 sand bass R u-106 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 c;nd bass Th-228 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Zn-65 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Ze(Hb)-95 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 0 G- G I
O '
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SurttARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortin5 Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hase, Distance Meantf) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range RanSe Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/5) (flesh type) cea hare As-110m 5 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hare Ce-141 5 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 tea hara Ce-144 5 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hara Co-57 5 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cea hare Co-58 5 0.0100 0.2457( 4/ 51 0.3200( 3/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.023- 0.360) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.290- 0.360) 0.6 ml. WSW tea hara Co-60 5 0.0070 0.8582( 5/ 5) 1.0400( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.131- 1.900) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.430- 1.9001 0.6 ml. WSW cea hare Cs-134 5 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hara Cs-137 5 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cea hare Fe-59 5 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 i'
4 a
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine S mpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif ) Hame Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tcble 12a Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flesh type) cca hare H-3 Aqueous 5 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 51 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cea hara H-3 Bound 5 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 eca hare I-131 5 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hara K-40 5 0.2000 1.8560( 5/ 5) 1.8700( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
( 1.290- 2.500) Unit 1 Outfall ( 1.290- 2.5001 0.6 ml. WSW cca hace Mn-54 5 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sea haru Mo(Tc)-99m 5 10 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) O cca hare Ra-226 5 0.0300 0.1867( 4/ 51 0.1867( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1 0.051- 0.5001 Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.051- 0.500) 0.6 m1, NSW cca hara Ru-103 5 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cea hara Ru-106 5 0.0700 (LLD ( 6/ 5) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 9 9 O ;
O O O 18APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Medlup or Pathway Total Number Location with Number of of Locations Highest Annual Mean Sampled (Unlt of Analyses Detectton Mean(fI Hame, Distance Control Locations Nonroutine of Measurement) Meant f ) Meantf) Reported Performed (LLD) RanSe and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type) sea hare Th-228 5 0.0300 0.2800( 4/ 51
( 0.170- 0.520) Unit 1 Outfall 0.2800( 4/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 03 0 I 0.170- 0.520) t 0.6 ml. WSW l sea hare 2n-65 5 0.0700 LD ( 0/ 5) ALL CLLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sea hare Zr(Nb)-95 5 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 5) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sheephead A3-110m 12 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD (, 0/ 43 0 sheephead Ce-141 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 sheephead Ce-144 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead Co-57 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 I
sheephead Co-60 12 0.0070
! 0.0250( 1/ 8) 0.0250( 1/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
- ( 0.025- 0.025) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.025- 0.025) 0.6 ml. WSW
,! - I g
i 18APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportin5 Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Mith Number of Medium or Pathway Total ilumber of Locations Hishest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction RanSe Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (flesh type) cheephead Cs-134 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <t.LD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 cheephead Cs-137 12 0.0030 0.0064( 8/ 81 0.0076( 4/ 4) 0.0040( 1/ 41 0
( 0.003- 0.009) Units 2/3 SSH Outfall ( 0.004- 0.009) ( 0.004- 0.004) 0.7 al.
cheephead Fe-59 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) O cheephead H-3 Aqueous 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cheephead H-3 Bound 12 3.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) O cheephead I-131 12 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 cheephead K-40 12 0.2000 2.8125( 3/ 31 2.8750( 4/ 41 2.8500( 4/ 41 0
= ( 2.700- 3.100) Units 2/3 SSH Outfall ( 2.700- 3.100) ( 2.500- 3.300) 0.7 al.
cheephead Mn-54 12 0.0100 (LLD I 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cheephead Mo(Tc)-99m 12 10 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 O G. O r
~
i O O O 18APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM StJPflARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medlue or Pathway Total Number Number of Sampled (Unit of Analyses of Detection Locations Mean(f)
Highest Annual Mean Name, Distance Control Locations Noncoutine of Measurement)
Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (pol /3) (flesh type) sheephead Ra-226 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead Ru-103 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 sheephead Ru-106 12 0.0700 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead Th-228 12 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheephead 2n-65 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead ZetHb)-95 12 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
spiney lobster An-110s 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 spiney lobster Ce-141 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiney lobster Ce-144 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
?'
g
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HCHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket Ho, 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportin5 Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medium or Pathway Total Humber Number of of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Simpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meantf) Honroutine Cf Measurement)
Hame, Distance Meanif) Mean(f) Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Hon-MIsratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flesh type) cptney lobster Co-57 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster Co-58 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 i
cpiney lobster Co-60 12 0.0070 0.0222( 5/ 8) 0.0237( 3/ 4) (LLD ( 0/ 41 0
( 0.010- 0.040) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.010- 0.040) 0.6 ml. HSH cptney lobster Cs-134 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster Cs-137 12 0.0030 0.0064( 6/ 81 0.0077( 3/ 41 0.0077( 3/ 41 0
( 0.004- 0.009) HeHPort Beach ( 0.005- 0.013) ( 0.005- 0.013) 30 ml. NN cptney lobster Fa-59 12 0.0730 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster H-3 Aqueous 12 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) O cptney lobster H-3 Bound 12 3.0000 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 epiney lobster I-131 12 0.2000 <LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
w s
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION a
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Number of Medlue or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported af Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12a Non-Migratory Marine euarterly Composite (PC1/3) (flash type) i epiney lobster K-40 12 0.2000 3.2625( 8/ El 3.2750( 4/ 41 2.9500( 4/ 41 0
( 2.700- 3.900) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 2.900- 3.600) ( 2.600- 3.3001 0.7 al. SSW epiney lobster Mn-54 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 i
epiney lobster Mo(Tc)-99m 12 10 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0
~
1 cptney lobster Ra-226 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster Ru-103 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster Ru-106 12 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cptney lobster Th-228 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 CPiney lobster Zn-65 12 0.0700 (LLD I 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 1
4 epiney lobster Zr(Hb)-95 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l c) b
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit ALL Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Simpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean( f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tcble 12b Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone type) bay mussel As-110m 3 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ce-141 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ce-144 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 br.y mussel Co-57 3 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 bay mussel Co-58 3 0.0200 0.0700( 1/ 3) 0.0700( 1/ 3) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.070- 0.070) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.070- 0.070) 0.7 al. SSW bay mussel Co-60 3 0.0100 0.0597( 3/ 31 0.0597f 3/ 31 (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
( 0.025- 0.110) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.025- 0.1101 0.7 ml. SSW bay mussel Cs-134 3 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 bay mussel Cs-137 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Fe-59 3 0.100( <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD - -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 0 -
G e I
O O l 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportinej period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif ) Hame, Distance Maant f ) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Misratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/5) (bone type) bay mussel I-131 3 0.3000 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 bay mussel K-40 3 0.2000 0.3300( 2/ 31 0.3300( 2/ 3) (LLD ( 0/ 03 0
' ( 0.240- 0.420) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.240- 0.420)
O.7 al. SSW bay mussel Mn-54 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i bay mussel Mo(Tcl-99m 3 60 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ra-226 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Ru-103 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0
]
bay mussel Ru-106 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 bay mussel Th-228 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I
bay mussel Zn-65 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ '3 ) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0
}
T 1:
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL r10HITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine S"spled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 12b Non-Migratory Marine ,
Quarterly Composite (PCl/g) (bone type) bay mussel Ze(Hb)-95 3 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 black perch Ag-110m 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch Ce-141 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ce-144 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Co-57 5 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 black perch Co-58 8 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch co-60 8 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ ~4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Cs-134 8 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Cs-137 8 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ %) 0 9 9 O ;
J 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING $TATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f ) Meantf) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements J
! Table 12b l Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PC1/3) (bone type) black perch Fe-59 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch I-131 8 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch K-40 8 0.2000 1.9250( 4/ 41 2.2500( 2/ 21 1.5250( 4/ 41 0
( 1.000- 2.5001 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 2.000- 2.500) ( 1.000- 2.1001 0.7 al. SSW i black perch Mn-54 8 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Mo(Tc)-99m 8 t>0 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 black perch Ra-226 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Ru-103 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
i black perch Ru-106 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( C/ 4) 0 black perch Th-228 8 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
Q j
5;
09APR86 ENVIRCNMENTAL RADIOLGCICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
~
Type anU~^ Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Hume. of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine SinPled (Unit of Analyst. Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 12b Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PC1/3) (bone type) black perch Zn-65 8 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 black perch Zr(Hbl-95 8 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet As-1104 4 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 k yhole limpet "e-1%1 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 kryhole limpet Ce-144 4 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 kcyhole limpet Co-57 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet Co-58 4 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet Co-60 4 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kryhole limpet Cs-134 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 e -- - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
e _ _
G :
- _ - - - - - - =_ -_ _ - . - . . -- - - . . . . _ . . - _ _ . - - - -
4 i
i 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPflARY l SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 i
San Diego County, California 1
Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower L1 alt All Indlcator Location utth Number of 1 Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detect 1on Meantf) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported 6f Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone type) i keyhole limpet Cs-137 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 j keyhole llapet Fe-59 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 keyhole limpet I-131 4 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet K-40 4 0.2000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet Mn-54 4 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 l
keyhole limpet Mo(Tc)-99m 4 60 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 keyhole limpet Ra-226 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 keyhole limpet Ru-103 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 1
keyhole limpet Ru-106 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
l i U2
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUMMAR)
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Srepled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean[f) Mean(f) Reported Cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Misr: tory Marina Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone type) kcyhole limpet Th-228 4 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kcyhole limpet Zn-65 4 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 kcyhole limpet Zr(Hbl-95 4 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 opalaya AS-110m 3 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 opaleye Ce-141 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 opaleye Ce-144 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 opalaya Co-57 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye co-58 3 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 opalaya Co-60 3 0.0100 0.4000( 1/ 31 0.4000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 0.400- 0.400) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.400- 0.400) 0.6 ml. WSW
~
. -- - . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _- -_~ --
! 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION '
1 Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Mith Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Reported Mean(f) cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction RanSe Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Migratory Marine i Quarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone type)
{ CPaleye Cs-134 3 0.0300 (LLD I 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye Cs-137 3 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cpaleye Fe-59 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye I-131 3 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 1
opaleye K-40 3 0.2000 2.1333t 3/ 31 2.2000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1 1.300- 2.9001 Unit 1 Outfall ( 2.200- 2.2003 0.4 al. HSH opaleye Mn-54 3 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
opaleye Mo(Tc)-99m 3 60 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I
opaleye Ra-226 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye Ru-103 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
i i
03 5
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reportlns period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humbar of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (pC1/3) (bone type) opaleye Ru-106 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD L 0/ 0) 0 opalaye Th-228 3 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opaleye Zn-65 3 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 opalaye Zr(Nbl-95 3 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 3) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) O plie perch AS-110m 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ! 0/ 0) O plie perch Ce-141 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD ----- (LLD I 0/ 03 0 plie perch Ce-144 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 pile perch Co-57 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 plie perch co-58 1 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 13 ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 9 9 O ;
. _ . - _ . _ . . . _ . . - _ __. _._.___.-- - _ _.__.__ _ . _ _ _. _ _ _ ~ . _ .- - - . _ .
I I
l 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPWGARY
- SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l.
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location ulth Number of Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean control Locations Noncoutine 1 Sampled (Unlt of Analyses Detection Meantf) Name. Distance Mean(f) MeantfI Reported
] cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements i
j Table 12b
! Non-Migratory Marine i Guarterly Composite (PCl/3) (bone typal plie perch Co-60 1 0.0100 0.0710( 1/ 1) 0.0710( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 0) 0
( 0.071- 0.071) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.071- 0.071) 0.6 ml. WSW pile perch Cs-134 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 plie perch Cs-137 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 03 0 l
plie perch Fe-59 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
plie perch I-131 1 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 l
} plie perch K-40 1 0.2000 2.3000( 1/ 1) 2.3000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
t 2.300- 2.300) Unit 1 Outfall ( 2.300- 2.300) 0.6 ml. WsW
/
3 plie perch Mn-54 1 0.0300 (LLD I 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
l plie perch Mo(Tc)-99m 1 60 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I
< i j plie perch Ra-226 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 i
I
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame. Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 12b Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/s) (bone type)
Pile perch Ru-103 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL CLLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 plie perch Ru-106 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 13 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 Pfle Perch Th-228 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 plie perch Zn-65 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0.' 0) O Pfle Perch ZrlHb)-95 1 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass As-110m 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ccnd bass Ce-141 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 sand bass Ce-144 1 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 ccnd bass Co-57 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 0 0 0 :
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SuretARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING $TATION I
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i
RePortin5 Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llatt All Indicator Location with Number of -
Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noncoutine l Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detectton Meantf3 Name, Distance Meantf) of Measurement) Mean(f1 Reported Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Non-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite
', iPCI/5) (bor.e type) sand bass Co-58 1 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Co-60 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 sand bass Cs-134 1 0.0300 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I
sand bass Fe-59 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass I-131 1 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 sand bass K-40 1 0.2000 2.3000( 1/ 11 2.3000( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 03 0
( 2.300- 2.3001 Units 2/3 Outfall ( 2.300- 2.300)
, 0.7 al. SSW sand bass Mn-54 1 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Mo(Tc)-99m 1 60 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
I u.
%8
i 18APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Nlth Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif ) Name. Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Migratory Marine 4 Quarterly Composite (PC1/3) (bone type) sand bass Ra-226 1 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 sand bass Ru-103 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass R u-106 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sand bass Th-228 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 sand bass Zn-65 1 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 l
sand bass Zr(Hbl-95 1 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 sheephead As-110m 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead Ce-141 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheephead Ce-144 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
i l
l l l
l 18APRS6 ENVIR0659 ENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SIAftARY f
SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION l
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i
Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 l
i Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of i Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Noneoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f )
i Mean(f ) Reported i
of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b l Hon-Migratory Marine Guarterly Composite ,
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 i
i sheephead Co-58 12 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 4 sheephead Co-60 12 0.0100 0.1100( 1/ 81 0.1100( 1/ 4) (LLD ( C/ 4) 0 l ( 0.110- 0.110) Unit 1 Outfall ( 0.110- 0.110) i 0.6 31. WSW I
sheephead Cs-134 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 l
i sheephead Fe-59 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 43 0 I
j sheephead I-131 12 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
(
A sheephead K-40 12 0.2000 1.9375( 8/ 81 2.1000( 4/ 41 2.1000( 4/ 41 0 t 1.200- 2.600) Neuport Beach ( 1.900- 2.300) ( 1.900- 2.300) j 30 al. 964 .
sheephead Mn-54 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 1
m y
l 18APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortin5 Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 TVPe and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hishest Annual Mean Control Locations Sampled tunit of Analyses Nonroutine Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 12b Hon-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (pol /gl (bone type) sheephead Mo(Tc)-99m 12 60 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheephead Ra-226 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead Ru-103 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( -0/ 4) O sheephead Ru-106 I? 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL CLLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 cheephead Th-228 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 41 0 sheephead 2n-65 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 sheephead Zr(Hb)-95 12 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 43 0 spiney lobster AS-110m 12 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiney lobster Ce-141 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
- G. G :
m 9
}
I
)
4 09APRS6 ENVIRepelENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLN9tARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
J Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California i
j Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of i Medium or pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine l Sampled tuntt of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name. Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f ) Reported j of Measurement) performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements i
! Table 12b i Hon-Migratory Marine ll Guarterly Composite ,
j (pC1/3) (bone type) l spiney lobster Ce-144 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 41 0 1
l j spiney lobster Co-57 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 4) 0 1
spiney lobster Co-58 12 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 j
! spiney lobster Co-60 12 0.0100 0.0447( 7/ 8) 0.0587( 3/ 41 0.0110( 1/ 43 0 jl ( 0.013- 0.091) Units 2/3 Outfall ( 0.025- 0.091) ( 0.011- 0.011) 0.7 al. SSW .
j spiney lobster Cs-134 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 1
spiney lobster Cs-137 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 i
epiney lobster Fe-59 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ SI ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 l
l spiney lobster I-131 12 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 i
cptney lobster K-40 12 0.2000 1.8300( 8/ 8) 1.8825( 4/ 4) 1.5525( 4/ 41 0
( 1.210- 2.500) Unit 1 Outfall ( 1.330- 2.500) ( 1.240- 1.880)
O.6 ml.
WSW i
1 =
j i a 3
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f) Reported Cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Ttble 12b Non-Migratory Marine Quarterly Composite (PCl/g) (bone type) epiney lobster Mn-54 12 0.0300 (LLD ( 0/ 81 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 spiney lobster rio(Tc )-99m 12 60 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 sPiney lobster Ra-226 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 4) 0 cptney Icbster Ru-103 12 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spipey lobster Ru-106 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 spincy lobster Th-228 12 0.0500 (LLD I 0/ 8) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 43 0 spiney lobster 2n-65 12 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0 spiney lobster Zr(Hbi-95 12 0.0600 (LLD ( 0/ 8) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 41 0
L , :!'
o e n t ES fn e -
cidm ,
tce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rutr eoru bros mnpa uoee .
- NHRM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s
n o / / / / / / / / /
i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t
a) cfe ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
otS Lnn aa D D D D D D D D D leR L L L L L L L L L oM L L L L L L L L L r < ( ( ( ( ( < ( (
t n
o C
)
fe - - - - - - - - -
tg - - - - - - - - -
Y 5 nn - - - - - - - - -
R 8 naa - - - - - - - - -
A 9 aeR - - - - - - - - -
M 1 eM P M U , h S 1 tl 3 ia MN wu AO r n RI GT b e nn oAe OA m i cn RT a e ttno PS i c asai n e cett GG r D ohsc NN o L gj e II 1f o iDr D D D D D D D D D RT 6i t H ,i L L L L L L L L L
- OA 3l D L L L L L L L L L TR - a 5 e ( < < ( ( ( < ( (
IE 0C 8 md NN 5, 9 an L L L L L L L L L OE 1 Ha L L L L L L L L L MG .y A A A A -
ot , A A A A A LR Nn 1 AA u 0 ) ) ) 1 ) ) ) ) 1 CE to r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IL eC y o GC k r ts OU co og u a an3 / / / / / / / / /
LH cofe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O De n iitg
. IE i a dtnn DR AF D J naaa ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
IceR RO n oM N a d lL D D D D D D D D D LO S o l L L L L L L L L L A i A L L L L L L TN r L L L
< ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
NA e ES P M
N S t O n i n m o R i 0 0 0 0 0 0 I t i t) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 5 5 3 V r L tD 1 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 N
E o fcL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
- P roeL
_ e e t( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R w e o D L
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
es be msd duye nNlm
- a ar lno m eaAf 0 1 4 4 7 pt r 1 4 4 8 yofe e 0 3 3 1 1 7 1 1 5 6 1 1 3 TToP t - - - - - - - - 1 i s e e e o o s s -
y c A B C C C C C C I a
o P
w ) m htt o tin C
- ane PUm sl r r r r r r r r r (e Pa e e e e e e e e e 6 r r aou w w w w w w w w w 8
R o u 3rn o o o o o o o o o ds 1Cn) l l l l l
._ P A
mea ule A3 f f f f f l
f l
f l
f l
f 9 el- / l l i 1 i i l i i iPM lai1 l l l 1 l l l l l 0 dm bcmC u u u u u u u u u eaf aoeP a a a a a a a a a MSo TLS( c c c c c c c c c
' 1 l ;
l: , ; ] l jiiII 1
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPflARY SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with th.aber of Medium or Pattway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements 7tble 13a Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PC1/3) c uliflower K-40 1 0.0700 1.6900( 1/ 11 1.6900( 1/ 1' <LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 1.690- 1.690) San Mateo Canyon ( 1.690- 1.690) 2.6 ml. NW ctuliflower Ru-103 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) O crullflower Zr(Hb)-95 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 eucumber AS-110m 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sucumber Be-7 2 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) O cucumbem Ce-141 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Ce-144 2 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 23 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cucumber Co-58 2 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Co-60 2 0.0070 <LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 9 9 9
. .i 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUf9tARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLF.AR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1955 to December 31, 1985 Type and loner Limit All Indicator Location HIth Number of Medlue or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported Cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 13a Local Crops Seel-Annual Compos 1te (PCl/5) cucumber Cs-134 2 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 sucumber Cs-137 2 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 03 0 cucumber I-131 2 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 s
cucumber K-40 2 0.0700 1.5200( 2/ 2) 1.5200( 2/ 2) (LLD ( 0/ 01 0
( 1.330- 1.710) San Mateo Canyon ( 1.330- 1.710) 2.6 al. NW Cucumber Ru-103 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL <LLp -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 cucumber Zr(Nb)-95 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 21 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 kale As-110e 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -+---
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 kale Be-7 1 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 -
kale Ce-141 1 0.0100 (LLD I 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
l' '
)l ll! I I ,ll 3 ;
t e n fn e oidm tee 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 rutr eoru bros mnpa uoee NHRM 1
1
)
1
)
1
)
1
)
1 1
1
))
10
)
1
)
1 O
s 4 n 7 o / / / / / / / / /
i 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 t
a) -
cfe ( ( ( ( ( ( (0 ( (
o(g 04 Lnn 07 aa D D D D D D 4 D D leR L L L L L L 71 L L oM L L L L L L L L r < ( ( ( ( < 1( ( (
t n
o 3)
C 10 4
7
)
/
11 fe - - - - - - - -
(g - - - - - - - - -
Y 5 nn - - - - - - (0 - -
R 8 naa - - - - - - 04 - -
A t
9 aeR - - - - - - 07 - -
t 1 eM 4 t M 71 U , h S 1 tl 1(
3 ia MN AO r wun RI e nn GT b oAe e OA m i cn d RT a e ttno i PS i c asai sE n e cett nS GG r D ohsc a NN o L gi e e II 1f o iDr D D D D D D c D D RT 6i t Hi L L L L L L O L L OA 3l D L L L L L L . L L TR - a 5 e < ( ( ( < < fl < (
IE 0C 8 md oa NN 5, 9 an L L L L L L L L OE 1 Ha L L L L L L E2 L L MG .y A A A A A A S2 A A ot O
LR Hn 1 AA u 0 ) 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CE to r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IL eC y o GC k r ts OU co a og u an) / / / / / / / / /
LH cofe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O De n ii( g IE i a dtnn DR D J naaa ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
AF IceR RO n : oM H a d lL D D D D D D D D D LO S o l L L L L L L L L L A i A L L L L L L L L L TN r ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
NA e ES p M
N g t O n i n R
I i
t m oi) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
0 7 7 5 5 3 0 0 0 V r L tD 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 N o p
fcL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E roeL e e t( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R w e o D L
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r
es be msd duye nHlm 5 a ar 9 lno -
eaAf 4 4 7 3 )
Pt r 4 8 0 3 3 1 0 b yofe e 1 5 6 1 1 3 0 1 H TToP t - - - - - 1 4 H l i e o o s s - - U e s C C C C C I K R Z y o p
a w ) m htt o tin C ane 6
8 R
P PUm r r o u mea
( e ds sl pa aou 3rn 1Cn)
A3 O_
A ule el /
9 ipM lai1 e e e e e e e e e _
0 dm bcmC l l l l l l l l l eaf aoeP a a a a a a a a a MSo TLS( k k k k k k k k k
k 09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PR0r.R UI CUMMARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Monroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hasse, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 13a Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/s)
! equash As-110m 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 13 0 equash Be-7 1 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 equash Ce-141 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 cquash Co-144 1 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 cquash Co-58 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 13 0 l
cquash Co-60 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 equash Cs-134 1 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 i
equash Cs-137 1 0.0050 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 13 0 I equash I-131 1 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 Y
< C
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL ttOHITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GEHERATING STATION Docket Ho. 50-361 San Diego County, Calffornia RePortin5 Period January 01, 1985 (J December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llutt All Indicator Location Nith Humber of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hishest Aratual Mean Control Locations Honroutine SraPled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Meanif) Reported Cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements TEble 13a Lccal Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/s) equash r-40 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) 1.6600( 1/ 11 1.6600( 1/ 1) 0 SE of Oceanside ( 1.660- 1.660) ( 1.660- 1.660) 22 al. SE equash Ru-103 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 equash Zr(Hb)-95 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans A3-110m 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD I 0/ 1) O ctring beans Be-7 1 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans Ce-141 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctrinS beans Ce-144 1 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans Co-58 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans Co-60 1 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0
O O O 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9tARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION t --
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Mith Number of Med'un or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detactton Meantf1 Hame, Distance Meantf) Meantf) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 13a Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite ,
(pCl/3) string beans Cs-134 1 0.0050 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 string beans Cs-137 1 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans I-131 1 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) O etring beans K-40 1 0.0700 (LLD ( 0/ 0) 1.4800( 1/ 13 1.4800( 1/ 11 0 SE of Oceanside ( 1.480- 1.480) ( 1.480- 1.480) 22 al. SE etring beans Ru-103 1 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 string beans Zr(Nbl-95 1 0.0100 <LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato As-110m 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD ----- <LLD ( 0/ 1) O tomato Be-7 2 0.0400 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 s
tomato Ce-141 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 13 0 I E
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location Hith Number of Medium or PathMay Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine simpled tuntt of Analyses Detection Meanif ) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Reported Meantf) cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tcble 13a LCcal Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PC1/3) tomato Ce-144 2 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato Co-58 2 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) O tomato Co-60 2 0.0070 (LLD ( 0/ 11 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato Cs-134 2 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato Cs-137 2 0.0050 <LLD ( 0/ 1} ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 tomato I-131 2 0.0030 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) O tomato K-40 2 0.0700 1.9000( 1/ 11 1.9000( 1/ 11 1.7900( 1/ 11 0
( 1.900- 1.900) San Mateo Canyon ( 1.900- 1.900) ( 1.790- 1.790) 2.6 ml. NH tomato Ru-103 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) O tomato Zr(Hb)-95 2 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 e e e I
O '
! 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUP9tARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortin5 Period January b2, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medlue or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hase, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 13b Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/5) caullflower H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 I ,
cauliflower H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 01 0 1
cauliflower Sr-90 1 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 0) 0 cucumber H-3 Aqueous 2 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LL3 ( 0/ 03 0 Eucumber H-3 Bound 2 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 0) O cucumber Sr-90 2 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 2) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 01 0 kale H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 6
kale H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 ,
kale Sr-90 1 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 i
/ =
09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN OHOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Humber of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honcoutine Simpled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f ) Hame, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tchle 13b Lccal Crops Semi-Annual Com.mstte (PCl/s) equash H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 cquash H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) O equash Sr-90 1 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) O ctring beans H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD ( 0/ 01 ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 ctring beans H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 11 0 ctring beans Sr-90 1 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 0) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 .
tomato H-3 Aqueous 2 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato H-3 Bound 2 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 tomato Sr-90 2 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 1) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 9 9 O ;
i 09APR86 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPflARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Llatt All Indicator Location with Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Ntsaber of Sampled (Unit of Analyses Control Locations Nonroutine Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Meantf) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements l
Table 14 Soll Samples
< Annual Composite (PC1/3) l t
As-110m 5 0.1000 (LLD ( O'/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 13 0 I
Be-7 5 0.3000 (LLD ( 0/ 41 ALL (LLD i
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 l-l Ce-141 5 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 i
! Ce-144 5 0.1000 <LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
I (LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 Co-58 5 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 1) 0 l
< L!.D ( 0/ 11 0 l
}
} I-131 5 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 i
K-40 5 2.0000 13.4( 4/ 41 Bastione Road 20( 1/ 11
( 6.300-20.000) Freeway Offramp 19( 1/ 11 0 i
2.0 al. pse (20.000-20.000) (19.000-19.000)
Ru-103 5 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 l
1
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIDH Docket No. 50-361 San Diego Ccunty, California Reporting Period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location With Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine S::mPled (Unit of Analyses Detection Meanif) Hame, Distance Mean(f ) Mean(f) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range RanSe Measurements Tchie 14 Sull Samples Annual Composite (PC1/3)
Sr-90 5 0.0100 0.0250( 2/ 41 0.0300( 1/ 1) (LLD ( 0/ 11 0
( 0.020- 0.030) Old Route 101 SE ( 0.030- 0.030) 3.0 al. SE Zr(Hb)-95 5 0.1000 (LLD ( 0/ 4) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 11 0 O G. O ;
i i
. 09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM st.R9tARY
) SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING $TATION Docket No. 50-361
- San Diego County, California
{ Reporting period January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
! Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Nonroutine sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 15 Kelp semi-Annual Composite (PCl/3) macrosystis p. As-110m 10 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 3) 0 i
j macrosystis P. Co-141 10 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 1
I sacrosystis P. Ce-144 10 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
<LLD ( 0/ 31 0 sacrosystis P. Co-57 10 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis P. Co-58 10 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis P. Co-60 10 0.0040 0.0042( 1/ 71 san onofre 0.0042( 1/ 3) (LLD ( 0/ 31 0 I
( 0.004- 0.004) Kelp Bed ( 0.004- 0.004) 1.5 ml. S j macrosystis P. Cs-134 10 0.0040 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis p. Cs-137 10 0.0C40 0.0046( 1/ 71 0.0056( 1/ 33 0.0056( 1/ 31 0
( 0.005- 0.005) NeHPort Beach ( 0.006- 0.006) ( 0.006- 0.006) 30 al. NW macrosystis P. Fe-59 10 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 l
m m
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MOHITORING PROGRAM SIAftARY SAN ONOFRE HUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Docket No. 50-361 San Die 90 County, California RePortinS Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Number of Medium or Pathway Total Number of Locations Hl5 hest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Sampled (Unit of Analyses Detection Mean(f) Hame. Distance Mean(f ) Meanif ) Reported of Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Tr.ble 15 KO1P Semi-Annual Composite (PCl/s) macrosystis P. H-3 Aqueous 10 0.0500 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 3) 0 sacrosystis P. H-3 Bound 10 0.5000 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD - - - -
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis p. I-131 10 0.0100 0.0266( 5/ 7) 0.0380( 2/ 31 0.0380( 2/ 31 0
( 0.013- 0.054) NeHPort Beach ( 0.018- 0.054) ( 0.018- 0.058) 30 al. HW macrosystis P. K-40 10 0.0400 4.9571( 7/ 7) San Mateo 5.3667( 3/ 3) 4.5400( 3/ 31 0
( 0.800- 9.100) Kelp Bad ( 0.800- 9.100) ( 1.120- 6.6C0) 3.5 m1. WHW macrosystis P. Mn-54 10 0.0050 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 33 0 macrosystis P. Mo(Tc)-99m 10 2.0000 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis P. Ra-226 10 0.0090 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 33 0 macrosystis P. Ru-103 10 0.0090 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis P. Ru-106 10 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL (LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 9 9 O I
?,
09APRS6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORINC PROGRAM SUP9tARY SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California RePortins Period: January 01, 1985 to December 31, 1985
! Type and Lower Limit All Indicator Location with Medium or Pathway Total Number Number of j Sampled (Unit of Analyses of Locations Hl5 hest Annual Mean Control Locations Honroutine Detection Meanif) Name. Distance Meantf) Mean(f ) Reported cf Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Range Measurements Table 15 Kelp Seal-Annual Composite
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 j macrosystis P. Zn-65 10 0.0200 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 macrosystis P. Ze(Nb)-95 10 0.0100 (LLD ( 0/ 7) ALL <LLD -----
(LLD ( 0/ 31 0 l
l l
t 1
' ?
~a
)
i 1,
1 l
\
l i
I i
APPENDIX C l
SUMMARY
OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS l l i
)
f l
l
t 4
O O O j Results of Interlaboratory Comparisons for 1985 Date Samole TVDe Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR
- February Water (pci/l) Gamma Emitters I
- February Water Cr-51 23 11 48 1 5 39.3 56.7 0.24 February Water Co-60 1911 20 1 5 11.3 - 28.7 0.12 4
February Water Zn-65 53 1 3 55 1 5 46.3 - 63.7 0.71 February Water Ru-106 18 1 3 25 1 5 16.3 - 33.7 0.59 February Water Cs-134 30 11 3515 26.3 - 43.7 0.24 February Water Cs-137 2511 25 1 5 16.3 -- 33.7 0.24 l
i June Water Gamma Emitters i June Water Cr-51 40.7 1 2.5 44.0 1 5.0 35.34 - 52.7 0.59 j June , Water Co-60 15.0 1 1.0 14.0 1 5.0 5.34 - 22.7 0.24 i
June Water Zn-65 53.7 + 0.6 47.0 1 5.0 38.34 - 55.7 0.12 a
June Water Ru-106 40.7 1 5.7 62.0 1 5.0 53.34 - 70.7 0.80 l June Water Cs-134 34.0 1 2.0 35.0 1 5.0 26.34 - 43.7 0.47 June Water, Cs-137 23.0 1 1.0 20.0 1 5.0 11.34 - 28.7 0.24 1
- October Water Gannia Emitters
! October Water Cr-51 19.7 1 2.9 21.0 1 5.0 12.3 - 29.7 0.59
- October Water Co-60 19.0 1 0.0 20.0 1 5.0 11.3 -- 28.7 0.00 October Water Zn-65 19.7 1 0.1 19.0 1 5.0 10.3 - 27.7 0.12 October Water Ru-106 13.3 1 1.5 20.1 1 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 0.36 October Water Cs.134 19.3 1 1.2 20.0 1 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 0.24 0 1 w
i O O O j
Date Sample Type Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR October Water Cs-137 19.3 1 1.5 20.0 1 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 0.36 April Water I-131 4.3 1 0.6 7.5 1 0.8 6.1 - 8.9 0.74 i
August Water I-131 33.3 1 2.3 33.0 1 6.0 22.6 - 43.4 0.40 December Water I-131 48.0 1 3.6 45.0 1 6.0 34.6 - 55.4 0.69 January Water Gross Alpha 911 515 0.0 - 14.7 0.12 March Water Gross Alpha 10 + 1 6+5 0.0 - 14.7 0.24 May Water Gross Alpha 18.7 1 3.0 12.0 1 5.0 3.3 - 20.7 0.71 July Water Gross Alpha -- -- -- -.
September Water Gross Alpha 10.3 1 0.6 8.0 1 5.0 0.0 - 16.7 0.12 November Water Gross Alpha 15.3 1 0.6 10.0 1 5.0 1.3 - 18.7 0.12 January Water Gross Beta 20 1 1 1515 6.3 - 23.7 0.24 March Water Gross Beta 1311 1515 6.3 - 23.7 0.24 May Water Gross Beta 9.3 1 0.6 11.0 1 5.0 2.3 - 19.7 0.12 l July Water Gross Beta -- -- -- --
September Water Gross Beta 10.0 1 1.0 8.0 1 5.0 0.0 16.7 0.24 November Water Gross Beta 14.0 11.0 13.0 1 5.0 4.3 - 21.7 0.24 February Water Tritium 3647 1 130 3796 1 366 3162.1 - 4429.9 0.42 April Water Tritium 2503 1 147 3559 1 364 2928.5 - 4189.5 0.45 June Water Tritium 1917 1 31 2416 1 351 1808.0 - 3024.0 0.10 August Water Trittum 2397 i 93 4480 1 448 3704.0 - S256.0 0.24 ?
w
O O O i
Date Sample Type Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR October Water Tritium 1833.3 1 41.6 1974.0 1 345.0 1389.9 - 2319.0 0.14 December Water Tritium 1
March Water Ra-226 4.5 1 0.1 5.0 1 0.8 3.7 - 6.3 0.16 June Water Ra-226 2.6 1 0.1 3.1 1 0.4 0.0 - 8.5 0.13 September Water Ra-226 7.9 1 0.2 8.9 1 1.3 6.6 - 11.2 0.13 i
December Water Ra-226 4.6 1 0.4 7.1 1 1.1 5.2 - 9.0 0.50 i March Water Ra-228 5.7 1 0.1 9.0 1 1.4 6.7 - 11.3 0.09 i
June Water Ra-228 2.6 1 0.2 4.2 1 0.6 3.2 - 5.2 0.38 September Water Ra-228 2.9 1 0.1 4.6 1 0.7 3.4 - 5.8 0.17 December Water Ra-228 5.1 1 0.2 7.3 1 1.1 5.4 - 9.2 0.16 January Water Pu-239 15.1 1 0.3 15.7 1 1.6 12.9 - 18.4 0.10 July Water Pu-239 10.0 1 0.1 10.6 1 1.1 8.7 - 12.5 0.05 January Water Sr-89 <2 3.0 1 5.0 0.0 - 11.7 .-
i May Water Sr-89 40.3 1 2.5 39.0 1 5.0 30.3 - 47.7 0.59 September Water Sr-89 18.7 1 1.5 20.0 1 5.0 11.3 - 28.7 0.36 January Water Sr-90 3012 30 1 1.5 27.4 - 32.6 2.10 May Water Sr-90 14.0 1 0.0 15.0 1 1.5 12.4 - 17.6 0.00 September Water Sr-90 7.0 1 0.0 7.0 1 1.5 4.4 + 9.6 0.00 February Water U-238 1611 1216 1.6 - 22.4 0.20 l
August Water U-238 4.0 1 0.0 4+b 0.0 - 16.4 0.00 o 1
w
O O O
- Date Sample Type Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR l (Performance Evaluation)
April Water Gross Alpha 22.0 1 1.7 32.0 1 5.0 23.3 - 40.7 0.36 April Water Gross Beta 77.7 1 1.2 72.0 1 5.0 63.3 - 80.7 0.24 April Water Sr-89 13.6 1 0.6 10.0 + 5.0 1.3 - 18.7 0.12 i April Water Sr-90 14.3 1 0.6 15.0 11.5 12.4 - 17.6 0.39 I Water April Ra -226 3.6 1 0.2 4.1 1 0.6 3.1 - 5.1 0.49 April Water Ra-228 8.4 1 0.1 6.2 1 0.9 4.6 - 7.8 0.13 April Water 00-60 15.7 1 0.6 15.0 1 5.0 6.3 - 23.7 0.12 April Water Cs-134 14.3 1 0.6 15.0 1 5.0 6.3 - 23.7 0.12 April Water Cs-137 12.3 1 0.6 12.0 1 5.0 3.3 - 20.7 0.12 April Water U 7.0 1 1.0 7.0 1 6.0 0.0 - 17.4 0.20 October Water Gross Alpha 85.3 1 2.5 52.0 1 13.0 29.5 - 74.2 0.23 October Water Gross Beta 90.7 1 2.9 75.0 1 5.0 66.3 - 83.7 0.59 October Water Sr- 89 29.3 1 2.5 27.0 1 5.0 24.1 - 29.9 0.59 i
October Water Sr-90 9.0 1 0.0 9.0 1 1.5 6.4 - 11.6 0.00 October Water Ra-226 5.7 1 0.1 6.3 1 1.0 4.6 - 7.9 0.12 October Water Ra-228 7.7 1 0.3 10.1 1 1.5 7.5 - 12.7 0.19 October Water Co-60 18.3 1 0.6 18.0 1 5.0 9.3 26.7 0.12 October Water Cs-134 16.7 1 0.6 18.0 1 5.0 9.3 - 26.7 0.12 October Water Cs -137 18.7 1 0.6 18.0 1 5.0 9.3 - 26.7 0.12 October Water
?
U 5.7 1.l.2 8.0 1 6.0 0.0 - 18.4 0.20 a
O O O -
1 1
- Date Samole Type Analysis TYDe Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR March Air Filter Gross Alpha 11.0 i 1.0 10.0 1 5.0 1.3 - 18.7 0.24 (pC1/ Filter)
August Air Filter Gross Alpha 12.7 i 1.2 13.0 1 5.0 4.3 - 21.7 0.24 November Air Filter Gross Alpha j
4 March Air filter Gross Beta 37.3 + 2.5 36.0 + 5.0 27.3 - 44.7 -
0.59 l August Air F1 iter Gross Beta 41.0 + 1.7 44.0 + 5.0 35.3 - 52.7 0.36 i
November Air Filter Gross Beta l March Air Filter Sr-90 13.3 11.2 15.0 i 1.5 12.4 - 17.6 0.79 August Air Filter Sr-90 17.3 1 0.6 18.0 i 1.5 15.4 - 20.6 0.40 November Air Filter Sr-90 March Air Filter Cs-137 7.0 1 0.0 6.0 1 5.0 0.0 - 14.7 0.00 .
l August Air filter Cs-137 10.7 i 1.2 8.0 1 5.0 0.0 - 16.7 0.24
] November Air Filter Cs-137 March Milk (pC1/1) Sr-89 i March Milk Sr-90 i
March Milk I-131 511 9.0 1 0.9 7.4 - 10.6 0.66 1
March Milk Cs-137 1
i March Milk Ba-140 March Milk K(mg/l)
June Milk Sr-89 -- -- -- --
a June Milk Sr-90 Q 10.7 1 0.6 11.0 1 1.5 8.4 - 13.6 0.40 ui
! O O O Date Sample Type Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR June Milk I-131 < 10.0 11.0 1 6.0 0.6 - 21.4 --
June Milk Cs-137 14.0 1 0.0 11.0 1 5.0 2.3 - 19.7 0.00 June Milk Ba-140 -- -- - . - --
June Milk K(mg/1) 1606.7 i 15.3 1525.0 1 76.0 1393.4 - 1646.6 0.23 October Milk Sr- 89 -
48.0 1 5.0 39.3 - 56.6 --
October Milk Sr-90 25.3 1 2.3 26.0 1 1.5 23.4 - 28.6 1.85 October Milk I-131 43.0 1 1.0 42.0 1 6.0 31.6 - 51.4 0.20 October Milk Cs-1315 56.0 1 1.7 56.0 1 5.0 47.3 - 64.7 0.00 October Milk K 1543.3 1 5.8 1540.0 1 77.0 1406.6 - 1628.3 0.08 April Urine Tritium 2190.0 1 36.1 3056.0 1 359.0 2434.2 - 3677.8 0.12 July Urine Tritium 2266.7 1 23.1 2444.0 1 352.0 1834.3 - 3053.7 0.07 November Urine Tritium 2263.3 1 55.1 3586.0 1 365.0 2953.8 - 4218.2 0.18 January Food (pC1/Kg) Sr--89 28.0 1 3.5 34.0 1 5.0 25.3 - 42.7 0.71 January food Sr-90 20.7 1 0.6 26.0 1 1.5 23.4 - 28.6 0.39 January food Cs-137 28.3,1 2.1 29.0 1 5.0 20.3 - 37.7 0.47 January food Ba-140 - - - -
January food (mg/Kg) K 1156.7 1 71.0 1382.0 1 120.0 1174.2 - 1589.8 0.69 l
January Food (pC1/Kg) I-131 35.0 1 1.7 35.0 1 6.0 24.6 - 45.4 0.30 1
July food (pC1/Kg) Sr-89 --- - - - ---
July food Sr-90 32.3 1 2.1 26.0 1 1.5 23.4 - 28.6 1.85 m
O O O -
I t
i Date Sample Type Analysis Type Mean EAL + s. d. Known EPA + s. d. Control Limit R + oR
! July food Cs-137 31.0 1 1.0 29.0 1 5.0 20.3 - 37.7 0.24 j
July food Ba-140 - - - - --- --- . - -
July Food (mg/Kg) K 1370.0 1 10.0 1S14.0 1 76.0 1382.4 1645.6 0.16 July food (pC1/Kg) I-131 41.0 1 1.0 35.0 1 6.0 24.8 - 45.4 0.30 The results of interlaboratory cross-check program showed that 12% of the samples fell outside the control limit range. The errors were randomly distributed among all different samples and different analyses.
4 I
i 3
1 1
i O
1
-J
9 O
l APPENDIX 0 MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS j
i O
)
1 O
I
O O -
O "MEASUREMENIS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS"*
Date of Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control Direct Radiation Gamma Exposure San Onofre State Beach first Quarter 1985 26.6 21.1 (Quarterly) (CaSO4 TLD's)) Unit 1 (26.4)**
SONGS Meteorological fourth Quarter 1985 103.6 23.0 Tower (28.8)**
Direct Radiation Gamma Exposure SONGS Meteorological All four Quarters 1985 114.8 98.9 (Annual) (Lif TLD's) Tower (123.6)**
- If no positive value detected, then twice the lower limit of detection is used as criterion for comparison with the control.
- Number in paranthesis indicates 1.25 times control (required by Technical Specification)
?
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ = _ _ . _- . . .
~ - _ - -
- 4 O O O 2-
" MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS"
! Date of Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control .
Weekly Air Particlates Gross Beta City of San Clemente 1/29/85 0.028 0.013 (pC1/m3 ) ,
t Gross Beta Camp San Onofre 1/29/85 0.038 0.013 l"
Gross Beta Northeast Site 1/29/85 0.035 0.013
} Boundary Gross Beta Units 2 and 3 1/29/85 0.033 0.013 i
Switchyard Gross Beta SONGS Meteorological 1/29/85 0.030 0.013 i 4 Tower i
Gross Beta Bluff 1/29/85 0.031 0.013 -
Gross Beta Mesa EOF 1/29/85 0.032 0.013 Gross Beta Mesa EOF 1/29/85 0.029 0.011 i
I i !
l i
4 I
i
! ?
1
l O f I
" MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" I
Date of
, Medium Analysis Performed location Collection Indicator Control Monthly Drinking Water Gross Beta San Clemente 3/5/85 0.5 0 1 0.2 j Solids (pC1/ liter) Golf Course i r j Gross Beta Tri-Cities MWO 6/4/85 0.6 0 1 0.2 Reservoir j Gross Beta Tri-Cities MWO 8/12/85 0.7 0 1 0.2 i Reservoir f
l Gross Beta Tri-Cities MW0 9/6/85 0.3 0 1 0.1 Reservoir I
i i
i
]
i
}
I i-i I !
i
! o b
O O -
O l
j t
- i. " MEASUREMENTS EXCELDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" i
i Date of
! Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control 1
Monthly Drinking Gross Beta Iri-Cities 1/8/85 15 7 Water Filtrate (pC1/ liter) MWO Reservoir i
l Gross 8 eta San Clemente 4/9/85 12 5 . ,
l Golf Course !
Gross Beta San Clemente 9/6/85 '
12 4 I l Golf Course l
Gross Beta San Clemente 11/6/85 13 6 Golf Course t
Gross 8 eta San Clemente 12/6/85 18 6
{ Golf Course i
I i
i i
i 1
1 l
1 o
_ _ - - ~ .. .- _ - _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - -
O O O "NEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" Date of Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control
! Semi-Annual Ocean Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 East 6/25/85 0.51 0.17 Bottom Sediment Analysis: (Ra-226)
(pC1/g wet wt.)
l Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 2 5/21/85 0.36 0.17 Analysis: (Ra-226) f Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 3 6/25/85 0.40 0.17 Analysis: (Ra-226)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 East 6/25/85 0.58 0.17 Analysis: (1h-228)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 2 5/21/85 0.57 0.17 Analysis: (Th-228) 4 Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 3 6/25/85 0.50 0.17 Analysis: (Th-228) .
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 East 11/9/85 0.58 0.10 Analysis: (Ra-226)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 West 11/15/85 0.52 0.10 Analysis: (Ra-226)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 2 11/9/85 0.44 0.10 Analysis: (Ra-226)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 3 11/9/85 0.26 0.10 Analysis: (Ra-226)
Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 East 11/9/85 0.95 0.10 l Analysis: (Th-228) t 1
m
t a
i j 1 -
i 3 " MEASUREMENTS EXCELDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" (Continued) j i
] Date of '
i Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control !
Semi-Annual Ocean Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 1 West 11/15/85 0.90 0.10 Bottom Sediment Analysis: (Th-228)
(pC1/g wet wt.)
l Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 2 11/9/85 0.49 0.10 j
Analysis: (Th-228) 1 Gamma Spectral SONGS Unit 3 11/9/85 0.38 0.10 Analysis: (Th-228)
}
i 1
1 i i
i 1 ,
I 1
1 I
i i
l, I
5 O
O O O :
i
, 7- :
I
" MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" Date of Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control j
., Semi-Annual Kelp Gamma Spectral San Onofre Kelp Bed S/20/85 0.054 0.018 1 Analysis . Analysis: I-131
- (pC1/g wet wt.)
i l 81-Monthly Ocean Gross Beta Unit 2 Outfall 9/5/85 9 0+4 i Water (pC1/ liter) M1nus K-40 ,
Annual Soil Analysis Gamma Spectral Old Route 101 12/18/85 0.03 0 + 0.01 !
(pC1/g dry wt.) Analysis .
'l
.i-E
~
O O O 8-
" MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" Date of
- Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control Marine Species Gamma Spectral SONGS 1 (Sheepshead) 2/11/85 0.025 0 1 0.008 (pC1/g wet wt.) Analysis: Co-60 Flesh Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (0paleye) 2/11/85 0.037 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Spiny Lobster) 2/8/85 0.040 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) 2/6/85 0.71 0 1 0.008 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (8ay Mussel) 2/7/85 0.17 0 1 0.008 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Pile Perch) S/20/85 0.023 0 + 0.01 Cs-137 SONGS 1 (Pile Perch) S/20/85 0.0158 0.0071 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (0paleye) S/16/85 0.039 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Spiney Lobster) S/17/85 0.021 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Spiney Lobster) S/17/85 0.028 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) S/7/85 0.43 0 1 0.004 l
Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Bay Mussel) S/16/85 0.021 0 1 0.004 Ra-226 SONGS 1 (Sea liare) S/7/85 0.051 0 1 0.02 Th--228 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) S/7/85 0.21 0 1 0.02 Cs-137 SONGS 2/3 (Sheepshead) 8/6/85 0.0090 0.0040 l
Co-60 SONGS 1 (Sea liare) 7/31/85 1.12 0.003 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 8/6/85 0.028 0.003
?
co
O O O 4
" MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDING INVESTIGA110N LEVELS" (Continued)
Date of i Location j Medium Analysis Performed Collection Indicator Control Marine Species Ra-226 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) 7/31/85 0.110 0 1 0.01 (pC1/g wet wt.)
Flesh Th-228 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) 7/31/85 0.17 0 1 0.01 i
~
Co-58 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) 11/15/85 0.31 0 1 0.009 t
Co-58 SONGS 2/3 (Sea Hare) 11/9/85 0.023 0 1 0.009 ;
Co-60 SONGS 1 (Sea Hare) 11/15/85 1.90 0.0021 l'
Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Sea Hare) 11/9/85 0.131 0.0021 ,
l l
i
! i i
i t
4 0 o
O O O
" MEASUREMENTS EXCELOING INVESTIGATION LEVELS" Oate of Medium Analysis Performed Location Collection Indicator Control .
Marine Species Co-60 SONGS 1 (Sheepshead) 2/11/85 0.11 0 1 0.04 (pC1/g wet wt.)
Bone or Shell Co-60 SONGS 1 (Spiney Lobster) 2/8/85 0.041 0 1 0.007 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Spiney Lobster) 2/7/85 0.091 0 1 0.007 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 2/7/85 0.11 0 1 0.02 Co-58 SONGS 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 2/7/85 0.07 0 1 0.02 Co-60 SONGS I (Pile Perch) 5/20/85 0.071 0 1 0.02 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Spiney Lobster) 5/17/85 0.058 0.011
, Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Spiney Lobster) 5/17/85 0.060 0.011 Co-58 SONGS 2/3 (Spiney Lobster) 5/17/85 0.017 , 0 1 0.007 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Bay Mussel) 5/16/85 0.044 0 1 0.02 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (0paleye) 8/6/85 0.40 0 1 0.06 Co-60 SONGS 1 (Spiney Lobster) 8/9/85 0.025 0 1 0.01 Co-60 SONGS 2/3 (Spiney Lobster) 8/9/85 0.025 0 1 0.01
?
5
_ . . _ . - __---.u . - - - - - - - -
I O
1 i
APPENDIX E COMPARIS0N OF OPERATIONAL DATA WITH PREOPERATIONAL DATA O ,
i O
=- ____. _ .
l E-1 O APPENDIX E COMPARIS0N OF OPERATIONAL DATA WITH PRE 0PERATIONAL For comparison of operational data with the preoperational data, all the measurements from January 1979 to July 1982 are used for preoperational phase of SONGS Unit 2. These preoperational data are the actual operational data obtained from the radiological environmental monitoring program for SONGS Unit 1. Unit 1 became critical in 1967 and was in operation until February 2, 1982. Due to seismic modification backfits. Unit 1 did not operate during the period between February 3 and December 31, 1982.
j A variety of environmental samples were analyzed and the radioanalytical results (1979-1982) were compared with the 1985 operational data obtained for SONGS Units 2 and 3.
The following media were evaluated and compared with the operational data of SONGS 2 and 3:
A. External Radiation G. Ocean Bottom Sediments B. Air Particulates H. Marine Species C. Radioiodine I. Local Crops D. Ocean Water J. Soil
("'g
,) E. Drinking Water K. Kelp F. Shoreline Sediments A. Direct Radiation SONGS Unit 1:
No direct radiation data were obtained in the preoperational period of 1964 to 1967 to compare with the operational data.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
The operational data for Unit I are used as preoperational baseline for Units 2 and 3 (from 1979 to 1982). This seems to be a more conservative approach since the preoperational data during the years 1964 to 1967 have been affected by nuclear weapons contribution to the environmental radiation levels. Fiqures 14.15 and 16 compare the environmental radiation levels of indicator and control locations. As it can be seen, the control location external radiation level is higher than the indicator locations. Also, a decreasing trend and a negative slope (P.22) is observed from 1979 to 1985, partly due to the curtailment of the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Simultaneous variation in radiation levels between the control and indications in the same direction also shows that environmental and seasonal effects are contributing to these variations rather than plant operation.
I\ Direct radiation measurements were made both quarterly and annually at 67
\'- different locations. Dosimeters were collected at a number of onsite as well as at outer locations. In order to evaluate the variation in external radiation exposure, a plot was made of direct radiation exposure l
E-2 O in mrem, obtained from thermoluminescent dosimeters, versus time for six different locations, including Huntington Beach control. The figures compare all the locations and also show the time variation of radiation level during both preoperational (January 1979 - July 1982) and operational periods of July 1982 to December 1985. Fiqures 14. 15 and 16 show a decreasing trend in external radiation during its period from 1979 to 1982. The major outlier is the Huntington Beach control station with an exposure range of 25.1 to 44.1 millirem and an average of 32.1 millirem for the preoperational period. This value is 27% higher than all other indicator stations for the same time period. In the 1985 operational year for Units 2 and 3, all the indicator stations ranged from 9.4 to 26.7 millirem (excluding the SONGS met tower) with an average of 20.4 millirem where the Huntington Beach location ranged from 21.1 to 23.7 millirem with an average of 22.6 millirem.
The external radiation level was higher in the years 1978 through 1980.
This is reflected in the deeper slope in this region. The presence of '
the larger peaks in this region may be attributed to the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of March 14, 1978 and October 15, 1980. The volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens in May 1980 has been one of the contributors to the environmental radiation levels. The dispersion of the volcanic plume and the subsequent eruptions raised the environmental levels throughout the country. The residual activities from the previous years' weapons testing could also contribute and add to the environmental levels of 1978 through 1980. For example, September 17, 1977 atmospheric O' testing contributed to the 1978 environmental radiation levels. The smaller slope observed after 1980 through 1982 is probably due to the curtailment of the atmosphering nuclear weapons testing. Other factors, such as meteorology, geographic locations and statistical and seasonal fluctuations may also describe the difference in various environmental levels observed in all the stations studied.
The reduction of environmental factors, such as nuclear weapons testing, has also reduced the natural radiation levels of the environment.
Comparison of indicator station's data with those of the control station's show that there has not been an reasonable external radiation impact of SONGS 2 on the environment.
The highest radiation levels during the preoperational period extended from 1979 to 1980. The presence of the larger peaks during this time may be attributable, in part, to the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests that took place in September 1977, March 1978 and October 1980. The increased radiation levels may also be caused, in part, by the eruption of Mount St. Helens in May of 1980. Other factors such as meteorology, geographic location and statistical and seasonal fluctuations may describe the variability in the data seen during the preoperational period for each location. The decrease in radiation levels in the area surrounding SONGS during the preoperational period for the two units may be attributable to a curtailment of the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, and the continued decay of existing neutrou activation and fission products from previous nuclear weapons tests. The levels present in 1985 appear to be O's a continuation of the general decay pattern established during the preoperational period. Effect: due to Station operation, if any, are masked by this background radiation.
E-3 O B. Air Particulates SONGS Unit 1:
Before SONGS Unit 1 attained initial criticality, samples of air particulates were collected frequently from indicator and control locations surrounding SONGS, and subsequently analyzed for gross beta activity.
During this preoperational period (1964-1967), detectable gross beta activities at the indicator locations ranged from 0.030 to 3.81 pC1/m3, averag'ng 0.253 pC1/m3. The control location of Oceanside, had an average gross beta activity of 0.31 ranging from 0.04 to 2.77 pCi/m3, During 1985, the gross beta activity seen at the indicator locations ranged from 0.010 to 0.068 pC1/m3 , and averaging 0.020 pCi/m 3 . The control location gross beta activity ranged from 0.010 to 0.071 pCi/m3 with an average of 0.021 pC1/mJ. Fiqures 17a and 17b show the monthly variation in gross beta activity for both periods of time for the City of San Clemente and for the control location (i.e., Huntington Beach). The presence of many peaks during the preoperational period is indicative of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing within the corresponding time period. The decrease in activity levels between 1965 and 1985 might be ascribed to the curtailment of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing.
Valid comparisons of preoperational data to operational data are O difficult to make in this instance because the actual background levels are masked by activity from fallout from weapons testing.
During the preoperational period, the gross beta activities at the indicator locations ranged from 0.030 to 3.810 pC1/m3 , averaging 0.253 pCi/m3 There was, however, an eighteen month period of much larger activities. The higher activities of fourth quarter of 1980 through the second quarter of 1981 may be attributable to the Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapon test that occurred in October 1980, and the eruption of Mount St. Helens that occurred earlier that same year. Gross beta activity measured during this time period is used as part of the baseline for comparison with SONGS operational periods. The baseline is therefore considered to be January 1979 through October 1980, and August 1981 through July 1982.
In summary, it was concluded that the gross beta activities measured in air near San Onofre during 1985 were comparable to levels measured during the preoperational period.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
All of the measurements obtained from the SONGS Unit 1 operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) during the period from January 1979 to July 1982 are used as the preoperational baseline for SONGS Units 2 and 3. The preoperational data for SONGS Units 2 and 3 O
- E-4 i
are the actual operational cata obtained from the REMP for SONGS Unit 1 Unit 1 achieved initial criticality in 1967 and was in operation until l February 1982 when it was shut down to install seismic modification '
backfits. Units 2 and 3 achieved initial criticality in July 1982 and -
August 1963, respectively.
i Comparisons of preoperational data to 1985 operational data are possible for each of the exposure pathways to man, namely: (1) direct radiation, (2) air particulates (inhalation), (3) ocean water (waterborne), and drinking water (waterborne). Comparisons can also be made between preoperational and operational data for ocean bottom sediment data to ascertain if there has been any significant increase in radioactivity in ocean bottom sediments in the vicinity of the SONGS Units 2 and 3 outfalls. .
i In order to provide the preoperational data for SONGS 2 and 3, a number of studies were conducted from 1979 to 1982. These preoperational data for SONGS Units 2 and 3 are operational data of SONGS Unit 1 operation.
One of the studies involved measurement of gross beta activity in air particulates. Air samples from different locations near the plant were cellected on a weekly basis and analyzed. Fiaure 18a presents the monthly variation in the gross beta activity of the air particulates in San Clemente location and compares the gross beta activity levels of this station during the preoperational and operational periods (January 1979 l to December 1982). The operational period is from July 1982 to December i 1985. As it is seen from the graph, in most of the time span, the l environmental levels of gross beta remained the same for the indicator and the control locations. The minor variations observed are of statistical or seasonal nature depending on the geographical location of each station. The presence of the first major group of peaks observed during February to July 1978 of the preoperational period may be attributed to Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of March 14, 1978 and the residual fallout activity from the previous atmosphering testing of September 17, 1977 (Fiqures 17b). Volcanic activities and other environmental phenomena can attribute to this increase in gross beta level. During this time period (February to July 1978), the Huntington Beach control station was affected as well as the other locations. Since all the locations were affected equally, it may be concluded that the rise in gross beta activity was not plant related.
The decrease in gross beta activity level after July 1978 might be ascribed to the curtailment of nuclear weapons testing in the atmosphere. The rise in gross beta activity observed after October 1980
, is thought to be the fallout contribution from the Chinese atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of October 15, 1980. The presence of the large group of peaks, observed in the region of October 1980 to August 1981, is attributed to the October 15, 1980 atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and also to the volcanic eruption of Mount Saint Helens locationed in Washington State. The Chinese testing of October 1980 deposited a large amount of radioactivity to California and raised the background level.
- During this period, highest gross beta activity was observed.in i
Huntington Beach Control station (0.400 pC1/m3) in May 1981. The May l
4
,.-n,, +--- ,--,-,.mv -
~,,,.,~,en,, -,. ..-,,.+,,g,,.,,--m,~ .-, ,-+,w- . ,.m,,
O E -S O 1980 eruption of the Mount Saint Helen and the subsequent volcanic
-activities also contributed to the elevation of the natural background levels in the environment. The dispersion of the radioactive plume and <
its travel throughout the country affected the environmental levels at the locations being studies. All the locations, more or less, were affected simultaneously by these environmental factors. All the other minor peaks observed have little significance and their presence is attributed to the statistical deviation of the data points and also seasonal variation and fluctuations in all the locations. Fiqure 18b also compares the operational data obtained for Camp Pendleton at SONGS 2 and 3, during January to December 1985, with the preoperational data of January 1979 to July 1982. These data suggest that there is no plant-related activity released to the environment since the operational levels are not significantly different from the preoperational activity levels. A comparison between the control location (Huntington Beach) and the indicator locations did not reveal any significant difference in activity levels. The average activity in all the indicator locations was found to be 0.020 was 0.021 pCi/m3, 5%pCi/m3 wherethe higher, during in Huntington Beach operational period of Control January location it to December 1985. Therefore, it can be concluded that the rise in gross beta activity is not the result of plant operation and is the result of other environmental phenomena. It should be mentioned that the presence of activity due to atmospheric nuclear weapons testing and other environmental phenomena, such as volcanic activities, make the comparison difficult since the background level is affected.
C. Radiciodine SONGS Unit 1:
Radioiodine measurements were not made during preoperational period of 1964 to 1967 and the operational levels for SONGS Unit 1 have been below the lower limit of detection of (0.04 pCi/m 3),
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
)
A comparison of radioiodine measurements is not necessary since all the preoperational and operational data for I-131 level is below the lower limit of detection of 0.04 pCi/m 3, D. Ocean Water SONGS Unit 1:
No ocean water was analyzed during the preoperational period of SONGS Unit i so no comparison can be made.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
The gross beta radioactivity measured in the ocean water samples collected from each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from a control l
1
E-6 location in Huntington Beach for preoperational and operational data show that ninety to ninety-five percent of the activity observed in the ocean water is attributable to the presence of potassium-40, a naturally-occurring radionuclide.
The gross beta activity of ocean water during the preoperational period and the operational period were compared with time for all locations, three indicators and one control station. The gross beta variation is mainly due to variation in the level of naturally-occurring potassium-40. During 1979 and 1980, the average activity of all 3 locations seemed to be slightly higher, probably due to the radioactive fallout contribution of the atmospheric nuclear weapons testing in the previous years, i.e.,1977 and 1978. The maximum gross beta activity measured during the preoperat'.onal phase was 1350 pC1/1 compared to 1400 pC1/1 of the operational time. Maximum operational value of gross beta activity minus potassium-40 (Table II-1) was 9.0 pC1/1 at the SONGS station which indicates most of the gross beta activity of the ocean water is due to the naturally-occurring potassium-40 and the variation in activity levels of ocean water is mostly due to variation in the level of potassium-40. All the other fluctuations are seasonal and within the frame work of normal statistical deviations.
From these data, it was concluded that the operation of SONGS Units 2 and 3 has had a detectable, yet minimal impact on the environment taken in context with the preoperational data.
E. Drinking Water SONGS Unit 1:
Orinking water filtrate gross beta activity of the two periods have been compared in Fiqures 19a and 19b. As it is seen, the operational levels are much lower than the preoperational levels. The contribution of fallout to gross beta activity during the preoperational period prevents useful and accurate comparison with the preoperational data. However, gamma spectral analysis was performed on drinking water, and it did not show the presence of any plant specific radionuclides in detectable level (Table E-1, Part A, of Appendix E).
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
Filtrate:
During the preoperational and operational periods for SONGS Units 2 and 3, drinking water samples were collected on a monthly basis from two indicator locations in the vicinity of SONGS, and from a control location situated in Huntington Beach. After collection, the samples were filtered, and the filtrate and solids analyzed for both gross beta and gross alpha radioactivity. These data indicated that the concentrations of gross alpha and gross beta radioacti.vities in the samples collected 1
1 l
1 E-7 during the operational periods of SONGS Units 2 and 3 are generally equal to or less than those observed in samples obtained during the preoperational period (Table E-1, Part B, of Appendix E).
The gross beta activity of drinking water filtrate data were plotted against time and the results are shown in Fiqure 20. The graph includes all the indicators as well as the Huntington Beach control location. The variation in gross beta activity during operational period is random for all the locations and no increasing trend in the operational period is observed. It is worth noting that no drinking water pathway exists for the liquid effluent at SONGS.
The gross beta activity level in all indicator locations ranged from 6.0 pC1/1 to 20.0 pCi/l and averages 12.1 pC1/1 during preoperational time of January 1979 to July 1982. The gross beta activity range of Huntington Beach drinking water was 3.7 to 21.0 pC1/1 during the same preoperational time period and the mean was (7.8 pCi/1).
The mean gross beta activity of all the indicator locations during the operational period for Units 2 and 3 was (7.0-18.0) pC1/1 and in Huntington Beach control station it was (4.0-10.0) pCi/1. The difference in gross beta activity level of the control and indicator stations may be due to the different origins of the water samples in all three locations. Fiqure 20 also demonstrates that Tri-Cities reservoir f'- activity levels are slightly higher than the other two stations. The
( higher levels observed in certain months of each year may be attributable to the fallout contribution from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of the previous years and their effects on the Tri-Cities municipal water reservoir. The radioactive fallout would tend to affect the reservoir more than the other water supplies, such as San Clemente well water and Huntington Beach tap water because the reservoir is open to the air with only a floating cover, whereas the other water supplies are essentially solidly covered. All the statistical and seasonal fluctuations plus the various natural radioactivity levels (such as K-40) of each type of water sample do contribute to the various gross beta activity levels of the drinking water samples. Comparison between the three stations is therefore complicated due to the presence of different environmental factors. Since tap water, well water and reservoir water samples have different origins, a high gross beta activity at the Tri-Cities reservoir, due to fallout, would not show up at the Huntington Beach control station (tap water).
l l
E-8 r~N U TABLE E-1 DRINKING WATER PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS 1 PART A Analysis Indicator Control Medium Period Tvoe Range Average Range Average Drinking water solids Pre-op G. Alpha <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Drinking water solids Op G. Alpha <LLD <LLD 0.20-0.2 0.20 Drinking water solids Pre-op G. Beta 0.37-3.00 1.08 <LLD <tLD Drinking water solids Op G. Beta 0.20-0.70 0.38 0.20-0.40 0.26 Drinking water filtrate Pre-op G. Alpha <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Drinking water filtrate Op G. Alpha 8.0-8.0 8.0 <LLD --
Drinking water filtrate Pre-op G. Beta 5.2-90.0 28.5 32.0-32.0 32.0 Drinking water filtrate Op G. Beta 7.0-18.0 11.3 4.0-10.0 6.58 DRINKING WATER p PRE 0PERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA G SONGS 2 AND 3 PART B Indicator Control Medium Period Analysis Range Average Range Average Drinking water solids Pre-op G. Alpha 0.20-0.40 0.33 0.30-0.60 0.45 Drinking water solids Op G. Alpha <LLD --
0.20-0.2 0.20 Drinking water solids Pre-op G. Beta 0.30-2.7 1.13 0.60-2.20 1.05 Drinking water solids Op G. Beta 0.20-0.70 0.38 0.20-0.40 0.26 Drinking water filtrate Pre-op G. Alpha 4.00-5.00 4.40 3.00-6.00 3.80 Drinking water filtrate Op G. Alpha 8.0-8.0 8.0 <LLD --
Drinking water filtrate Pre-op G. Beta 6.00-20.00 12.1 3.70-21.00 7.85 Drinking water filtrate Op G. Beta 7.0-18.0 11.3 4.0-10.0 6.58 O
1 l
E-9
('N l G Solids:
l The gross beta activity ranged from 0.3 to 2.7 pC1/1 in all indicator locations from January 1979 to July 1982. The activity range in Huntington Beach control was 0.6 to 2.2 pCi/l during the same time period. The highest gross beta activity observed during the preoperational time was in September 1980 (2.7 pC1/l) in Tri-Cities Municipal Reservoir and in January 1980 in San Clemente (2.2 pC1/1).
Control location maximum gross beta activity during the preoperational time was 2.2 pC1/1 in February 1979. In general, no increasing trend was observed during the preoperational and operational periods and all fluctuations are within the statistical deviatiens of the data points and also due to seasonal and other environmental phenomena.
The average gross beta activity during the preoperational phase was 1.13 pC1/1 for all the indicator location where in Huntington Beach control it was 1.05 pC1/1. During the operational period, the mean activity level of solids in all indicator locations was 0.38 pC1/1, significantly lower than 1.13 pCi/l value of the preoperational period.
In conclusion, the plant's operations has had no detectable effect on this medium.
F. Shoreline Sediments SONGS Unit 1:
No shoreline sediment samples were obtained during preoperational phase so no comparison can be made.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
The gamma spectral analysis did not show the presence of any plant-specific radionuclides and all measurements were below the lower limit of detections.
G. Ocean Bottom Sediments SONGS Unit 1:
Ocean bottom sediment samples were not taken during the preoperational phase of Unit 1 and therefore no comparison can be made. However, operational data for SONGS I did not reveal the presence of any significant radioactivity in the sediment samples.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
During the preoperational and operational periods, representative samples of ocean bottom sediments were collected semiannually from each of the Station discharge outfalls, and from a control location and analyzed for gamma-emitting radionuclides, including cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m O
- - - - , - - . -, - - . . - , , , - -_. , , . , - c-, - , _+-nm
E-10 O and cesium-137. The results of the analyses are listed in Table E-2~. It is clear in surveying the data that the concentration of each of the radionuclides has decreased with time, or -- as in the case of silver-110m '-- has consistently been below the lower limit of detection of that radionuclide.
^
The variation in activity of the ocean bottom sediments versus time is shown in Fiqures 22-27. During the preoperational time, a number of samples were analyzed semiannually to determine the plant-specific radionuclides, if any. Radionuclides such.as cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and cesium-137 were found in a few samples. The activity range for cobalt-60 in the indicators for preoperational time was 0.04 to 8.10 pCi/g dry sediment and the control location activity was below lower limit of i detection. Cesium-137 level was 0.040 to 0.090 pC1/g dry for the indicators and 0.043 pct /g dry for control. The cobalt-60 activity in l the sediment samples of the operational period was 0.09 pC1/g dry. The l
SONGS 2 outfall sediment samples did not show any detectable cobalt-60 activity and their values were reported as zero. The cesium-137 at i locations north and south of SONGS 1 outfall had an activity of less than j the lower limit of detection and SONGS 2 outfall sediment samples showed no detectable activity. The com;;arison of sediment activity with the preoperational values is difficult due to small number of samples i
analyzed. Although cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137 are normally associated with nuclear power operations, preoperational study l reveals no accumulation trend for these radionuclides and no increase in i levels for these radionuclides was detected during the operational period l (Fiaures 22-27). It is not concluded that SONGS 2 and 3 operation has l had any impact upon this environment.
The fact that the concentrations of the radionuclides decreased with time
! is probably due to the curtailment of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, i and the continued decay of fission and activation products from previous j atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.
These results indicate that there has not been a buildup of radionuclides with time in ocean bottom sediment near SONGS.
H. Marine Species i
! SONGS Unit 1:
No marine samples were taken in the preoperational period so no ,
comparison can be made. i SONGS Units 2 and 3:
Different types of marine species were caught during the preoperational period and the operational time. Species, such as sheepshead, black perch and spiny lobster were collected four times a year and were analyzed for a number of radionuclides, most plant-specific ones.
Cobalt-58, cobalt-60, silver-110m and cesium-137 activity levels were
E-11 O TABLE E-2 OCEAN 80TTOM SEDIMENTS PRE 0PERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 Indicator Control Radionuclide Period
- Rance Average Rance Average K-40 Preop 8.930-19.000 14.732 13.0-13.0 13.0 K-40 Op 6.800-14.100 10.85 10.0-14.10 12.10 Mn-54 Preop 0.080-0.490 0.285 <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l
Co-58 Preop 0.046-1.160 0.422 <LLD <LLD Co-58 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.040-8.100 1.169 <LLD <LLD Co-60 Op 0.090-0.090 0.090 0.090-0.090 0.090 Ag-110m Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop 0.040-0.090 0.0502 0.043-0.043 0.043
- Cs-137 Op <LLD <LLD sLLD <LLD Ce-144 Preop 0.260-0.260 0.260 <LLD <LLD Ce-144 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i Ra-226 Preop 0.130-1.350 0.445 0.0090-0.600 0.231 1
Ra-226 Op 0.220-0.580 0.411 0.100-0.170 0.135 Th-228 Preop 0.190-0.480 0.282 0.200-0.200 0.200 1
Th-228 Op 0.260-0.950 0.579 0.100-0.170 0.135 1
!
- Preop = January 1979 to July 1982 i Op = January to December 1985 ,
l
, ~ , - - . - . . - - , - . _ . - -_ . .O-- . . - . . , - - - . . . . . - . - - - - , - - - , ,.
E-12 O determined by gamma-ray spectrometry. Fiqures 28-36 illustrate the variation in concentration of cobalt-60, silver-110m and Cesium-137 in marine species caught at SONGS 1, 2 and 3 outfalls during the preoperational and operational phases.
In conclusion, it is seen that the operational levels are not different than the preoperational levels (Table E-3), and no trend of accumulation of radionuclides in marine species was observed. The plant's operation therefore has had no significant impact on the marine environment.
I. Local Crops SONGS Unit 1:
During the preoperational phase of Unit 1, local crops were collected semiannually from both indicator and control locations, and subsequently analyzed for both aqueous and organically-bound tritium, and for strontium-90. These types of analyses were then continued into the operational phase of the radiological environmental monitoring program.
The results of these analyses are summarized in Table E-4, Parts A and B.
In short, from 1964 to 1967, no aqueous or organically-bound tritium was detected in samples collected from either the indicator or control locations. Strontium-90, however, was present in detectable amounts in N four different types of samples collected from the indicator locations
\s near SONGS, and not in any of the samples collected from the control location.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
In 1985, no aqueous, or organically-bound tritium was detected in any of the indicator samples or samples obtained from the control location.
Strontium-90 was not detected in any of the samples from the indicator or control location.
In each instance, the levels of aqueous tritium as well as strontium-90 seen in samples from the indicator locations in 1984 have been commensurate with or below the activity levels seen in samples collected during preoperational years. Insufficient data exists at this time to determine the significance of the one sample which contained organically bound tritium.
J. Soil SONGS Unit 1:
No soil data were available for Unit 1 preoperational phase so comparison cannot be made. However, gamma isotopic analysis of soil does not show any significant level of radioactivity in soil and in most measurements, all the levels were below the lower limit of detection of the
["'N radionuclides of interest.
E-13 O TABLE E-3 MARINE SPECIES PRE 0PERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 SheeDshead Flesh Indicator Control Radionuclide Period
- Range Average Range Average H-3' Aqueous Preop <LLD <LLD 0.110-0.110 0.110 H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <tLD <LLD. <LLD H-3 Bound Preop --- --- --- ---
H-3 Bound Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 Preop 3.100-3.400 3.250 2.800-2.800 2.800 K-40 Op 2.700-3.100 2.812 2.500-3.300 2.850 Mn-54 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preop 0.016-0.030 0.023 <tLD <LLD Co-58 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.007-0.044 0.027 <LLD <LLD Co-60 Op 0.025-0.025 0.025 <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop 0.004-0.018 0.010 0.005-0.012 0.007 Cs-137 Op 0.003-0.009 0.006 0.004-0.004 0.004
- Preop = January 1979 to July 1982 '
Op = January to December 1985 o
E-14 ,
O TABLE E-3 Black Perch Flesh Indicator Control Radionuclide Period Ranae Averaae Range Average H-3 Aqueous Preop 0.35-0.35 0.35 <LLD <LLD H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Bound Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l
H-3 Bound Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 Preop 2.500-2.800 2.650 2.500-2.500 2.500 K-40 Op 2.100-2.800 2.375 2.200-3.800 2.875 Mn-54 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i
Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preop 0.011-0.011 0.011 <LLD <LLD Co-58 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- Co-60 Preop 0.012-0.045 0.030 <LLD <LLD Co-60 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l
Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Op 0.005-0.011 0.007 0.003-0.007 0.005 O
\ .. .-. __
I l
E-15 1
TABLE E-3 Bay Mussel Flesh l
Indicator Control Radionuclide Period Range Average ___ Range Average H-3 Aqueous Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Bound Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD ;
H-3 Bound 0p <LLD <LLD <LLD ;LLD K-40 Preop 1.400-1.400 1.400 <LLD <LLD K-40 Op 0.980-1.700 1.227 <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Preop 0.025-0.025 0.025 <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preop 0.011-0.080 0.031 <LLD <LLD Co-58 Op 0.012-0.160 0.086 <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.010-0.400 0.085 <LLD <LLD Co--60 Op 0.021-0.170 0.073 <tLD <LLD Ag-110m Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop 0.003-0.006 0.004 <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Op 0.006-0.006 0.006 <LLD <LLD Ru-103 Preop 0.045-0.045 0.045 <LLD <LLD Ru-103 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
_ _ , _ . . . _ . - - . . _ _ . . _ _ . . . _ - _ _ _ . . _ _ , . , .~,
E-16 O TABLE E-3 Spinev Lobster Flesh l
Indicator Control Radionuclide Period Range Average Range Average H-3 Aqueous Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Bound Preop --- --- - - - ---
H-3 Bound 0p <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 Preop 2.600-3.100 2.850 2.800 2.800 1
K-40 Op 2.700-3.900 3.262 2.600-3.300 2.950
]
Mn-54 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i
Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preop 0.013-0.270 0.095 <LLD <LLD Co-58 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.014-0.210 0.061 <LLD <LLD Co-60 Op 0.010-0.040 0.022 <LLD <LLD I
Ag-110m Preop 0.092-0.360 0.192 <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop 0.005-0.011 0.008 0.004-0.015 0.008 Cs-137 Op 0.004-0.009 0.006 0.005-0.013 0.008 O
I -. _-. - , _
E-17 O TABLE E-3 Sea Hare Flesh Indicator Control Radioruclide Period Range AveraQe Range Average H-3 Aqueous Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Bound Preop --- --- --- ---
H-3 Bound Op- <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 Op 1.290-2.500 1.856 <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop 0.017-0.017 0.017 <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preap 0.031-12.4 1.335 <LLD <LLD Co-58 Op 0.023-0.360 0.246 <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.016-2.000 0.441 0.012-0.027 0.018 Co-60 Op 0.131-1.900 0.858 <LLD <LLD Zn-65 Preop 0.100 0.100 <LLD <LLD Zn-65 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Preop 0.100-0.500 0.203 <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop 0.004-0.004 0.004 0.005-0.005 0.005 Cs-137 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 Op 0.051-0.500 0.187 <LLD <LLD Th-228 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Th-228 Op 0.170-0.520 0.280 <LLD <LLD l
l E-18l l
O TABLE E-3 Keyhole Limoet (Flesh) l Indicator Control Radionuclide Period Range Averaae Range Average H-3 Aqueous Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Aqueous Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD H-3 Bound Preop --- --- --- ---
4 H-3 Bound 0p <LLD <LLD <LLD <LL D
] K-40 Preop <LLD <LLD 0.880-1.190 1.042
., K-40 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mn-54 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 Preop 0.054-0.101 0.078 0.190-0.190 0.190 Co-58 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD J
d Fe-59 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Preop 0.021-0.040 <LLD 0.022-0.022 0.022 Co-60 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m Preop 0.101-0.101 0.101 <LLD <LLD ;
Ag-110m Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Preop <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 Preop <LLD <LLD 0.005-0.005 0.005 Cs-137 Op <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD O
E-19 O SONGS Units 2 and 3:
A comparison of cperational and preoperational data does not reveal any accumulation pattern of strontium-90 or cesium-137 in soil. Figures 21a and 21b compare strontium-90 and cesium-137 variations between dif ferent locations from 1975 to 1985, respectively.
K. Kelp SONGS Unit 1:
No preoperational samples were taken so comparison cannot be made.
SONGS Units 2 and 3:
The operational data for kelp have been tabulated with the preoperational data in Table F-5 of Appendix F. The data show that most plant-related radionuclides have concentrations below their lower limits of detetion.
The plant related radionuclide, namely iodine-131 was detected in most of the samples taken. No accumulation trends were observed. Considering that the half-life of iodine-131 (8.05 days) is short relative to processing time of harvestable kelp samples, no dose impact will result.
Cobalt-60 and cesium-137 were also present in same samples. The above-mentioned radionuclides have also been observed at the control location
(^g of Newport Beach. The presence of cesium-137 at the control location may V be due to the reverse current; namely, south to north. Further evaluation and investigation are required to find out the origin of these radionuclides in kelp. It should be noted that kelp analysis is not required by Technical Specifications.
O ;
1 L _ __ _ _.
O O O TABLE E-4, PART A 1
Reporting period: January 1, 1964 to December 31, 1967 Midium or Type and All Indicator Location with Control Number of Pathway Sampled Total Number Lower Limit Locations Highest Statistical Mean Locations Nonroutine (Unit of Of Analyses of Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Range Ranac Measurements Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite (pC1/g) ,
cabbage H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD --
<LLD (0/0) O cabbage H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 cabbage Sr-90 1 0.0040 0.0080 (1/1) 0.0080 (1/1) <LLD (0/0) 0 (0.008 0.008) San Mateo Canyon (0.008-0.008) 2.6 mi. NW celery H-3 Aqueous 2 0.0500 <LLD (0/2) All <LLD .--
<LLD (0/0) 0 celery H-3 Bound 2 0.5000 <LLD (0/2) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 celery Sr-90 2 0.0040 0.0190 (1/2) 0.0190 (1/2) <LLD (0/0) 0 (0.019-0.019) San Mateo Canyon (0.019-0.019) 2.6 mi. NW lettuce H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD - - -
<LLD (0/0) 0 lettuce H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 lettuce Sr-90 1 0.0040 0.0300 (1/1) 0.0300 (1/1) <LLD (0/0) 0 (0.030-0.030) San Mateo Canyon (0.030-0.030 2.6 mi. NW
O O O TABLE E.-4, PART B ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON 110 RING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ON0fRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION i
Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1985 Medium or Type and All Indicator Location with Control Number of Pathway Sampled Total Number Lower Limit Locations Highest Annual Mean Locations Nonroutine (Unit of Of Analyses of Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported ;
Measurement) Performed (LLD) Ranae and Direction Ranae Ranae Measurements Table 13b ,
Local Crops Semi-Annual Composite
- (pC1/g) i cauliflower H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0
- cauliflower H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/1) All <LLO ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 l
- cauliflower Sr-90 1 0.0040 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 l
cucumber H-3 Aqueous 2 0.0500 <LLD (0/2) All <LLD - - - -
<LLD (0/0) 0 I cucumber H-3 Bound 2 0.5000 <LLD (0/2) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 l cucumber Sr-90 2 0.0040 <LLD (0/2) , All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/0) 0 kale H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 l
kale H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 kale Sr--90 1 0.0040 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 squash H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 -<LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) O squash H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 t
squash Sr-90 1 0.0040 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) O m i
. - . _ - . . _ - . - - . =. - --_ . - - - . . . . - . .
O O O TABLE E-4, PARf B ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SAN ON0fRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION j Docket No. 50-361 San Diego County, California Reporting period: January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1985
! Medium or Type and All Indicator Location with Control Number of
! Pathway Sampled Total Number Lower Limit Locations Highest Annual Mean Locations Nonroutine (Unit of Of Analyses of Detection Mean(f) Name, Distance Mean(f) Mean(f) Reported Measurement) Performed (LLD) Range and Direction Ranae Range Measurements Table 13b (Continued)
Local Crops Seni-Annual Composite (pCi/g) string beans H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 l string beans H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 string beans Sr-90 1 0.0040 <LLD (0/0) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 tomato H-3 Aqueous 1 0.0500 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 tomato H-3 Bound 1 0.5000 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) O tomato Sr-90 1 0.0040 <LLD (0/1) All <LLD ---
<LLD (0/1) 0 i .
e i
i E$
1
a g m 2 , -- --- xn _ - - . - , - -- m-- a _ . - -
4 O
i l.
APPENDIX F HISTORICAL TRENDING OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA O e l
f i
F-1 S0lt Soil samples are collected annually from four indicator locations and a control location in Huntington Beach, and subsequently analyzed for'a number of naturally-occurring and Station-related radionuclides. The results of the analyses f rom 1981 through 1985 are listed in Table F-1. During this time frame, five radionuclides were detected in the samples, namely: potassium-40, strontium-90, cesium-137, radium-226 and thorium-232.
Naturally-occurring (i.e., non-Station relatea) radionuclides detected in soil samples include the following: potassium-40, radium-226 and thorium-232. The potassiumi40 concentrations seen in the samples vary from year to year at a given location, and to a greater extent between locations. The same type of phenomenon is applicable to the few instances where radium-226 and thorium-228 were measured in the soil < samples Cesium-137, a Station-related radionuclide, has also been detected in a number of the samples collected from both the indicator aad control locations.
Looking at 1981 data, the cesium-137 levels measured at three out of four indicator location were detectability greater than control values. Since then, however, the concentrations of cesium-137 in the samples from each indicator location have been commensurate with, or below the concentrations of cesium-137 observed in the samples from Huntington Beach. (Fiqure 21b)
Strontium-90, a naturally-occurring / Station-related radionuclide, has been O, detected in varying amounts in samples collected from both indicator and control locations. Over the past five years, the concentrations of strontium-90 measured in samples from Camp San Onofre and the Old Highway 101 have exceeded strontium-90 levels measured at Huntington Beach. The concentrations of strontium-90 measured at both Basilone Road, and the Visitor's Center, however, have been equivalent over the past five years.
(Fiaure 21a)
Over the past few years, minute amounts of naturally-occurring and Station-related radionuclides have been detected in soil samples'near San Onofre and at the control location in Huntington Beach. Potassium-40, radium-226 and thorium-228 have been detected in amounts characteristic of that environment. Cesium-137 concentrations have been fluctuating in the environment near SONGS with time, and although greater than control values in the case of Camp San Onofre and Old Highway 101 have been observed, the strontium-90 and cesium-137 levels have shown 60 trends of accumulating in the envir'onment in recent years.
i
[
(s )h
~ - ,,- -
e F-2 O TABLE F-1 SOIL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA 1981-1985 Camp San Onofre (pC1/g, dry wt): Old Highway 101 (pCi/g, dry wt):
Dec 81 Dec 82 Dec 83 Dec 84 Dec 85 Dec 81 Dec 82 Dec 83 Dec 84 Dec 85 Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.04 <LLD 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.03 I-131 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 0.15 0.02 0.05 0.14 <LLD 0.13 0.03 <LLD 0.04 0.08 j
Basilone Rd (pC1/g, dry wt): Visitor Center (pCi/g, dry wt):
Dec 81 Dec 82 Dec 83 Dec 84 Dec 85 Dec 81 Dec 82 Dec 83 Dec 84 Dec 85 Co-58 * '<LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD O_,
s Sr-90 <LLD 0.02 <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD 0.02 <LLD <LLD 0.02 I-131 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD Cs-134 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
<lLD <LLD <LLD 0.08 Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD 0.04 0.05 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Huntington Beach (pCi/g, dry wt):
Dec 81 Dec 82 Dec 83 Dec 84 Dec 85 Co-58 *
<LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 <LLD 0.02 <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 *
<LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD Cs-134 *
<tLD <Ll 3 <tLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD 0.12 0.07 0.12 <LLD Abbreviations: *
- a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection m
)
.-n
F-3 l
O SHORELINE SEDIMENT (BEACH SAND)
Samples of beach sand have been collected on a semiannual basis from both indicator and control locations, and subsequently analyzed for a number of radionuclides. The data collected over the past five years are presented in Table E-2.
During this time span, only three naturally-occurring, non-Station related radionuclides have been present in detectable amounts in any of the samples, namely: potassium-40, radium-226, and thorium-232. Throughout this time frame, data obtained from the indicator locations have been less than, or
! commensurate with data values obtained from the control location. These results indicated that there has been no change in the concentrations of these radionuclides in the environment near SONGS.
O
F-4 1
TA8LE F-2 8EACH SAND l RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA 0.5 Mile South of Unit 1 (pC1/g, dry wt):
Feb 81 Sap 81 Apr 82 Oct 82 Apr 83 Sep 83 Apr 84 Sep 84 Apr 85 Sep 85 K-40 *
- 18.0 13.0 14.0 13.2 11.6 13.6 11.9 10.6 Mn-54 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zn-65 * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mo(Tc)99m * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-106 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 0.02 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 * * <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD
,/ Ra-226 0.44 0.88 0.18 0.45 0.19 0.26 0.81 0.21 0.31 0.37 Th-232 decay chain 0.42 0.80 0.18 0.33 0.18 0.24 1.05 0.22 0.26 0.32 San Onofre Surfing Beach (pC1/g, dry wt):
Feb 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Oct 82 Apr 83 Sep 83 Apr 84 Sep 84 Apr 85 Sep 85 K-40 *
- 17.0 15.0 13.1 14.1 13.5 12.7 13.0 12.0 Mn-54 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 * * <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zn-65 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD Mo(Tc)99m <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l Ru-106 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m * *
<LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD Cs-134 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 * *
<LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 0.17 0.23 0.57 0.18 0.24 0.59 0.28 0.17 0.39 0.22 Th-232 decay
) chain 0.18 0.27 0.87 0.20 0.25 0.72 0.36 0.18 0.48 0.27 Abbreviations: *
- a radionuclide not determined in the analysis l
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection
~ . . - . . . . _ _ . - . - - - = - . - _ . . - .
F-5 2
O TABLE F-2 BEACH SAND RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA i
(Cont.)
South San Onofre State Beach (pCi/g, dry wt):
Feb 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Oct 82 Apr 83 Sep 83 Apr 84 Sep 84 Apr 85 Sep 85 K-40 *
- 15.0 16.0 13.5 13.4 11.4 15.8 13.6 13.4
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mn-54 <LLD <LLD Co-57 * * <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD < LLD <LLD l Co-58 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD
- * <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i Fe-59 <LLD <LLD i * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
, Zn-65 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mo(Tc)99m Ru-103 * * <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD i Ru-106 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD ,
Ag-110m * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l I-131 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLO <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD j Ce-141 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD ' <LLO <LLD <LLD Ce-144 * * <LLD 4
, <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
! Ra-226 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.16 0.13 0.31 0.64 0.12 0.73 0.15 Th-232 decay chain 0.11 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.43 0.13 1.07 0.20 j Newport Beach (pCi/g, dry wt):
! Feb 81 Sep 81 Apr 82 Oct 82 Apr 83 Sep 83 Apr 84 Sep 84 Apr 85 Sep 85 '
K-40 *
- 20.0 15.0 17.8 17.4 17.6- 20.0 17.2 15.3 Mn-54 * *
<tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD Co-57 * * <LLO <tLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO
<LLD Co-58 * * <LLD <LLD <LLO' <LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD i Fe-59 * *
<LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD l Co-60 * * <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zn-65 *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD j- Mo(Tc)99m <LLO <LLO <LLD -<LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * *
<LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD j Ru-106 * *
<LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD l Ag-110m * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO l' <LLD <LLD <LLD l I-131 * * <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD '
Cs-134 <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD l Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
<LLD .<LLD <LLD Ce-144 * *
<LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 0.28 0.55 0.54 1.27 0.26 0.46 0.63 0.24 0.52 0.52 Th-232 decay chain 0.71 1.26 1.53 3.8 0.80 1.28 2.1 0.45 1.43 2.0 l
Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection
F -f, AIRBORNE PARTICULATES_
During the past five years, air samples were collected on a weekly basis from i eight indicator locations and a control location in Huntington Beach. The samples were then analyzed for gross beta activity. l To determine whether or not there are any trends toward increasing gross beta activities with time, average quarterly gross beta activities from each indicator location were compared to equivalent data collected from Huntington Beach. These data are presented in Table F-3.
With one exception, the gross beta activities measured at the San Diego Gas and Electric Offices in San Clemente have been consistently below the data values obtained from Huntington Beach. The gross beta activities measured at Camp San Onofre, the Units 2 and 3 Switchyard, the SONGS Meteorological Tower, and the Bluff, on the other hand, have fluctuated from above to below the levels obtained from the control location, indicating that the Station has had minimal detectable impact on these locations, and that there are no overall trends toward increasing gross beta activities.
O O
F-7 O TABLE F-3 <
GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA Hunting- Camp Ton San San Visitor Units 2/3 Mat S. Beach Mesa Year Otr Beach Clemente Onofre Center S. Yard Tower Park Bluff EOF 0.200 * * *
- 1981 1 0.150 0.120 0.122 0.217 0.238 * * *
- 1981 2 0.163 0.083 0.075 0.231 1981 3 0.058 0.040 0.032 0.062 0.067 1981 4 0.039 0.028 0.023 0.044 0.067 0.021 0.023 0.020 * *
- 1982 1 0.021 0.018 0.018 0.017 0.020 0.020 0.018 * *
- 1982 2 0.020 0.018 0.018 0.019 0.018 * *
- 1982 3 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.019 0.020 0.024 0.028 0.025 * *
- 1982 4 0.023 1983 1 0.015 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.016 * *
- 1983 2 0.014 0.012 0.015 0.015 0.014 0.014 * *
- 1983 3 0.017 0.015 0.019 0.018 0.019 0.019 * *
- 1983 4 0.025 0.018 0.021 0.020 0.022 0.020 * * *
, 1984 1 0.029 0.017 0.023 0.027 0.031 0.023 0.025 0.028 0.029 1984 2 0.016 0.013 0.016 0.018 0.016 0.017 0.019 0.019 0.019 1984 3 0.016 0.016 0.019 0.019 0.019 0.016 0.016 0.023 0.019 1984 4 0.019 0.016 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.019 0.020 0.022 1985 1 0.023 0.020 0.023 0.024 0.023 0.022 0.019 0.020 0.026 1985 2 0.015 0.014 0.015 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.016 0.015 0.020 1985 3 0.016 0.014 0.018 0.018 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.017 0.019 1985 4 0.028 0.020 0.025 0.025 0.026 0.021 0.024 0.026 0.028 Abbreviations:
- Analysis not performed l
O
F-8 RADI0 IODINE IN AIR ,
Over a number of years, air samples have been collected from indicator and l control locations, and subsequently analyzed for radioiodine. During the past several years, I-131 has been at or below the lower limit of detection of 0.04 pC1/m3 of air in each of the weekly air samples collected within the exclusion area boundary.
Iodine-131 was detected in a few air samples taken from locations within the site boundary which are not required by Technical Specifications. These were as follows:
- Northeast site boundary (visitor center) - 1.51 pCi/m3 taken January 29 and 0.20 pCi/m3 taken February 5, 1985.
- Units 2/3 Switchyard - 0.92 pCi/m3 taken January 29, 0.06 pC1/m3 taken February 5 and 0.39 pCi/m3 taken February 12, 1985.
- State Beach Park - 0.05 pCi/m3 taken October 22, 1985
- Bluff - 0.05 pCi/m3 taken February 5, 1985
- Mesa EOF - 0.13 pC1/m3 taken January 29 and 0.05 pCi/m3 taken February 5, 1985 In a few samples, due to small volume of air collected, lower limit of detection of 0.04 pC1/m3 was not met. (Appendix I, Table 3)
Although radioiodine has been detected in several of the air samples above the levels observed at the control location, there is clearly no indication that iodine levels are increasing in the air around San Onofre.
l l
i O
F-9 LOCAL CR0PS Over the past few years, representative fleshy and leafy vegetables have been collected at harvest time from the San Mateo Canyon (near SONGS), and a control location situated Southeast (SE) of Oceanside. Upon collection, the samples have been analyzed for a number of naturally-occurring, and Station-related radionuclides. A summary of the radioanalytical data are presented in Table F-4. Radionuclides detected during this time frame include beryllium-7, potassium-40, strontium-90 and organically-bound tritium.
Bery111um-7, a naturally-occurring, non-Station related radionuclide, has been noted in a few of the samples collected from both indicator and control locations. Specifically, comparable levels of beryllium-7 were seen in samples of cauliflower and kale collected during December 1982, respectively, from the San Mateo Canyon and SSE of Oceanside. Beryllium-7 was again noted in cucumber samples collected from the San Mateo Canyon during September 1984, but not in the samples obtained from the control location. Finally, in June 1983, beryllium-7 was detected in kale samples collected from SSE of
- Oceanside, but not samples collected from the San Mateo Canyon.
Potassium-40, another naturally occurring, non= Station related radionuclide, has been detected consistently in samples collected from both the indicator and control locations over the past few years. Although there are detectable, differences in the amounts of potassium-40 seen in the samples from sampling sites, the levels are considered indicative of that particular environment.
Strontium-90 has also been detected in samples from both the San Mateo Canyon and SE of Oceanside. Over the past five years, strontium-90 has been seen in only one set of cauliflower samples collected from San Mateo Canyon during December 1982. Strontium-90 has been detected more frequently in samples from SE of Oceanside. Specifically, strontium-90 has been seen in parsley collected in June 1981, in both kale samples in 1982, 1983 and in kale samples collected in September 1984. The presence of strontium-90 in the samples from both locations is most likely due to fallout from nuclear weapons testing, and not Station operations.
Organically-bound tritium has also been detected in two samples collected from SE of Oceanside. Specifically, organically-bound tritium was seen in tomato and green bean samples collected in June 1984. Organically-bound tritium has been seen, however, in tomato and cucumber samples collected from San Mateo Canyon in June 1984.
Parsley taken June 1981, showed detectable levels of Ce-144. Cesium-137 was also present in detectable level in kale samples taken in 1983. The only radionuclide detected in cauliflower and cucumber of San Mateo Canyon and control location in 1985 was naturally occurring K-40.
Although several radionuclides were present in detectable amounts in vegetables over a period of years, there is no evidence that the concentrations of these radionuclides cre increasing in this media with time.
O
F-10 O TABLE F-4 CROPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA San Mateo Canyon (pC1/g, wet wt):
Jun 81 Jun 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Jun 82 Jun 82 Dec 82 Dec 82 Sample Tomatoes Cabbage Corn Cucumber Tomatoes Cucumber Tomatoes Cauliflr Be-7 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD 0.06 K-40 * * *
- 2.2 1.8 2.1 2.8
- * * * <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 <LLD
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 Zr(Nb)-95 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * * * <LLD Ru-103 <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * * * <LLD Ag-110m <LL9 <LLD <LLD I-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * * * <LLD Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD
<LLD Sr-90 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.007 Bound H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Aq. H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD J
SSE of Oceanside (pCi-g, wet wt):
Jun 81 Jun 81 Sep 81 Sep 81 Jun 82 Jun 82 Dec 82 Dec 82 Sample Tomatoes Parsley Tomatoes Parsley Tomatoes Kale Tomatoes Kale Be-7 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD 0.06 K-40 * * *
- 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.6 Co-58 * * * *
<LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 * * * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 * * * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144
- 0.031 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 <LLD 0.09 <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.027 <LLD 0.014 Bound H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Aq. H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis l
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection 1 O
F-11 O TABLE F-4 CROPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA (Con't)
San Mateo Canyon (pC1/g, wet wt):
Jun 83 Jun 83 Sep 83 Sep 83 Jun 84 Jun 84 Sep 84 Sep 84 Sample Tomatoes Cucumber Tomatoes Cucumber Tomatoes Cucumber Tomatoes Cucumber Be-7 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.06 K-40 2.3 1.6 2.1 1.7 2.2 1.5 1.8 1.7 Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD Bound H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.52 0.4 <LLD <LLD s ,,/ Aq. H-3 <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD SSE of Oceanside (pCi-g, wet wt):
Jun 83 Jun 83 Sep 83 Sep 83 Jun 84 Jun 84 Sep 84 Sep 84 Sample Tomatoes Kale Kale Tomatoes Tomatoes G. Beans Kale Tomatoes Be-7 <LLD 0.08 <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 2.6 3.1 1.8 2.2 1.5 2.0 1.0 2.0 Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD Ru-103 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD 0.0400 0.0072 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 <tLD 0.026 0.018 <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.015 <LLD Bound H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.5 2.1 <LLD <LLD Aq. H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis i
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection l O_
l
__ . _ . _ ~
F-12 O TABLE F-4 l CROPS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA (Con't)
! San Mateo Canyon (pC1/g, wet wt):
Jun 85 Jun 85 Sep 85 Sep 85 Sample Cucumber Cauliflr Cucumber Tomatoes Be-7 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD K-40 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.9 Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <tLD <LLD <LLO <LLD I-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLO Sr-90 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Bound H-3 O Aq. H-3
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD SSE of Oceanside (pCi-g, wet wt):
Jun 85 Jun 85 Sep 85 Sep 85 Sample St. Beans Squash Tomatoes Kale Be-7 <LLD 0.08 <LLD <LLD K-40 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.7 Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD I-131 <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-134 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Sr-90 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Bound H-3 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Aq. H-3 <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
}
w/
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection i
i
F-13 KELP Harvestable kelp has been collected semiannually from the San Onofre Kelp Bed, the San Mateo Kelp Bed, and from a kelp bed situated in Newport Beach.
Because of its atrophied condition, kelp has not collected from the Barn Kelp Bed by SONGS. Once collected, the kelp was analyzed for a number of naturally-occurring, and Station-related radionuclides. Radionuclides that have been detected in the kelp include potassium-40, cobalt-58, cobalt-60, iodine-131 and cesium-137. These data are presented in Table F-5.
Potassium-40, a naturally-occurring, non-Station related radionuclide, has been detected in all of the samples analyzed to date. The potassium-40 concentrations in the kelp collected from the San Onofre Kelp Bed over time have been slightly higher than the potassium-40 concentrations measured in the samples from the control location. The difference in potassium-40 levels is most likely due to natural variability in the distribution of potassium-40 over the earth's surface.
Looking at the data collected over the past five years, cobalt-58 has not been detectable in any of the samples collected from the control location. During this same time frame, coDalt-58 has been below detection limits in samples collected from both the San Onofre and San Mateo Kelp Beds, excluding the samples collected from the San Onofre Kelp Bed in 1984.
O Likewise, cobalt-60 has not been observed in any of the samples collected from the control location. Cobalt-60 has also been below the lower limit of detection in samples collected from both the San Onofre and San Mateo Kelp beds, with the exception of samples collected from them in June 1981, and in May and November 1984.
To ascertain if cobalt-58 and cobalt-60 are attributable to facility operations, and if these data are indicative of a trend toward accumulation of cobalt-58 in kelp, further samples will be analyzed, interpreted in terms of the data already collected, and correlated to Station effluent releases.
There is no evidence that I-131 is accumulating in kelp at the San Mateo Kelp Bed. However, there is evidence that iodine-131 is accumulating in the samples collected from the San Onofre Kelp Bed. Prior to 1983, the observed iodine-131 levels in samples f rom the San Onof re Kelp Beds were commensurate with or below the iodine-131 levels seen in kelp collected from Newport Beach. From this point on, iodine-131 has been detected in each semiannual sample collected from the San Onofre Kelp Bed and was in excess of background levels (i.e., the iodine concentrations obtained from the control location).
Background levels have also increased noticeably over the same span of time.
Because there is a weak, intermittent northern current (0.5 knots), the iodine-131 levels observed in kelp f rom Newport Beach may be attributable to Station operations. Hospitals are another potential source of iodine-131.
Studies are currently being performed to determine the actual source (s) of iodine-131 in the kelp samples.
O
F-14
\- e TABLE F-5 i KELP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA San Onofre Kelp Bed (pC1/g, dry wt):
Jun 81 Dec 81 Jun 82 Oct 82 May 83 Nov 83 May 84 Nov 84 May 85 Nov 85 K-40 *
- 5.2 5.5 4.6 6.7 6.5 7.4 9.0 3.5 Mn-54 <LLD * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 <tLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.007 0.012 <LLD <LLD Fe-59 * *
<tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 0.005 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD' <LLD 0.056 0.017 0.0037 0.0042 Zn-65 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD Zr(Nb)-95 0.080 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 4
Mo(Tc)99m * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * *
<lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <llD <LLD Ru-106 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 0.006 <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.053 0.033 0.22 0.105 0.054 0.008 Cs-134 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <lLD <lLD 0.0037 0.0037 0.0053 <LLD 0.0033 0.0046 Ce-141 * *
<LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 *
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<tLD
<LLD
<LLD
<lLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<tLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LCD
<LLD
<LLD Aq. H-3 * *
<lLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Bound H-3 * * <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 4 San Mateo Kelp Bed (wet wt):
Jun 81 Dec 81 Jun 82 Oct 82 May 83 Nov 83 May 84 Nov 84 May 85 Nov 85 K-40 *
- 4.2 4.4 7.2 4.7 4.5 6.0 9.1 6.2 Mn-54 <LLD * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.000 0.000 <lLD <LLD Fe-59 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-60 0.006 <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD 0.015 0.0079 0.0017 <LLD Zn-65 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 0.062 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Mo(Tc)99m <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-103 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-106 * *
<LLD <llD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 0.014 0.017 <LLD <LLD 0.049 0.020 0.016 0.060 0.033 0.013 Cs-134 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.0041 0.0035 0.0033 0.0059 0.0032 0.0038 Ce-141 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 4
(-')S g Th-228 Aq. H 3 *
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Bound H-3 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection
F-15 l
TABLE F-5 KELP RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA (Con't)
Newport Beach (wet wt):
Jun 81 Dec 81 Jun 82 Oct 82 May 83 Nov 83 May 84 Nov 84 May 85 Nov 85 K-40 *
- 2.4 4.7 6.3 4.7 6.9 5.8 5.9 6.6 Mn-54 * *
<LLD <lLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-57 * * <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Co-58 <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Fe-59 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD Co-60 <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD Zn-65 <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD
- <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 0.053 <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLO
<LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD Mo(Tc)99m Ru-103 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Ru-106 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD
- Ag-110m <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD I-131 0.030 0.010 <LLD <LLD 0.025 0.025 0.009 0.024 0.018 0.058 Cs-134 * *
<LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.0038 0.0029 0.0023 <LLD <LLO 0.0056
, Ce-141 <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD
\ Ce-144 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Ra-226 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <lLD <LLO <LLD Th-228 * * <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO Aq. H-3 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD i Bound H-3 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD 1.8 <LLO <LLD <LLD Barn Kelp Bed (wet wt.):
Jun 81 Dec 81 Jun 82 Oct 82 May 83 Nov 83 May 84 Nov 84 May 85 Nov 85 K-40 *
- 2.10 3.70 6.50 4.60 *
- 2.70
- Mn-54 0.068 * <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD * * <LLD
- Co-57 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLO <LLO Co-58 <tLD <LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD Fe-59 * *
<LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD I Co-60 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD 0.0016 <LLD Zn-L5 * % <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Zr(Nb)-95 0.068 <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO i
Mo(Tc)99m * * <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLO Ru-103 * * <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO Ru-106 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m <LLO <LLO <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD I-131 0.018 0.011 <LLD LLD 0.027 0.015 <LLD <LLO 0.019 <LLD Cs-134 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLO <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-141 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD Ce-144 0.016 * <LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD Ra-226 *
- x <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLO <LLO Th-228 * *
<LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO Aq. H-3 * * <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO <LLD <LLD <LLD Bound H-3 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLO Abbreviations: * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection
.- . - -- - - - .- -. .._ ~ - . . . -
i i
F-16 j OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS 1
i Ocean bottom sediment was not taken during the preoperational period of i i SONGS 1 (1964 to 1967). During the operational time of 1985, the ,
j concentrations of plant-specific radionuclides such as cobalt-58, cobalt--60, l silver-110m and cesium-137 were detectable (Table E-2). The variation in
- cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and cesium-137 is random and no accumulation pattern can !
be observed (Fiqures 22-27). Buildup of radionuclides in the ocean bottom sediment was studied to investigate the effect of the plant operation, if any, on the marine species. The measurement of sediment activity is not considered i to be of major importance as a critical pathway to man. However, a potential 4
exists for long-term buildup of radionuclides such as Cs-137 and Co-60 in the sediment. The 8-year study show no accumuletion pattern for these !
i radionuclides in the sediments. Species such as sea hare and spiney lobster (bottom dwellers) showed some very low levels of these radionuclides in their i flesh, but no accumulation pattern was observed either in the sediments or in i the species and all the activity levels are many times below the reporting i level (Table 11-3).
i <
It should be noted that the presence of cobalt-60 or Cs-137 in the bottom '
sediments may not necessarily affect the marine species since the accumulation or uptake of these radionuclides depends on many factors. Type or age of species, biological half life of the radionuclides in different species, availability to the species, solubility of the radionuclides and their
- chemical forms in ocean water and the digestive fluids of the organisms, uptake rate and the presence of other substances that could affect the uptake i
rate will all contribute to the accumulation mechanism. The presence of the i radionuclides may be attributable, in part, to plant's operation but no impact has been observed on this environment.
MARINE SPECIES Concentration of radionuclides such as cobalt-58, cobalt-60 and cesium-137 in 4
marine species have been plotted versus time and are presented in
! Fioures 28-36. No specific accumulation pattern has been observed in radionuclides present in marine species. All the variations are random.
CONCLUSIONS This assessment indicates that the variation of radioactivity level in i environmental media will be affected by several sources. Meteorology, i atmospheric nuclear weapons testing, fallout frequency, terrestrial conditions, coal and fuel processing plants, and the occurrence of earthquake and volcanic activities are among the factors which may affect, and lead to the elevation of the natural background levels in the environment. All activities noted during the operational phase are either at or below activity ,
attributable to these natural sources. l The result indicate that the plant's effect on the environment is minimal.
!, O 1
l I
I i
-__,_._____.-._._,____.m . _-.._..--._._ ,_ _.. _ __ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . , _ _ . - , , . _ , _ . . _ _ _ . , _ . _
F-17, O TABLE F-6 RABBIT RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING DATA 1981-1985 Flesh (pCi/g, dry wt):
Jun 81 Nov 81 May 82 Dec 82 Jun 83 Nov 83 Jun 84 Oct 84 Jun 85** Oct 85*'
K-40 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Mn-54 * * *
- 9.9 8.0 10.1 12.0 *
- Co-58 * *
<LLD <LLD <lLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Co-60 <LLD <LLD
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <lLD * *
, Zr(Nb)-95 *
- Ru-103 * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD Ag-110m * *
<tLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
. I-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD
- * <LLD <LLD <LLD * *
! Cs-134 <LLD <LLD <LLD Cs-137 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD * *
<LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Ce-141 <LLD <LLD <LLD Ce-144 * * <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Thyroid (pCi/g, dry wt):
1-131 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Bone (pCi/g, dry wt):
Sr-89 5 5 <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD *
- Sr-90 2 2 <LLD <LLD 14 <LLD <LLD <LLD * *
<LLD Calcium 0.31 0.24 0.29 0.36 0.33 0.37 0.38 0.33 *
- g Ca/g ash
- Abbreviations
- * - a radionuclide not determined in the analysis
<LLD - less than the lower limit of detection
- Jack rabbit analysis was deleted from the technical specification so there were no data for 1985 j
O i
O I
l
)
i APPENDIX G I
i DEVIATIONS FROM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS l
1 l
l I
I i
i I
i i
- l l
l l
i l
l
~
. G-1 Deviations from Sampling Requirements Part I. Terrestrial SamDlina
- a. Weekly Air SamDlina:
Air SamDier #1 San Clemente SDG and E Office o Down tirae for collection period 4/16/85 to 4/23/85 was 26.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />.
o Down time for collection period 8/6/85 to 8/13/85 was 2.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> due to power outage.
o Down time for collection period 10/8/85 to 10/15/85 was 3.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, probably due to the replacement of a faulty on/off switch.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
Air SamDier #2 CamD San Onofre. CamD Pendleton o Low air volume for collection period 6/4/85 to 6/11/85 was due to localized atmospheric variations.
o Down time for collection period 7/9/85 to 7/16/85 was 4.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> ;
due to replacement of the units power cord.
o Down time for collection period 9/24/85 to 10/1/85 was 4.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. It was caused by a faulty on/off switch.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading causeit by atmospheric conditions.
o Low air volume for collection period 11/5/85 to 11/12/85.
Air SamDier #3 Huntington Beach Generatina Station o Down time for collection period 2/5/85 to 2/12/85 had a lower-than--usual volume due to atmospheric condition, o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to filter loading caused by localized atmospheric conditions.
. O
G-2 O o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
Air Sampler #4 East Side Boundary Visitors Center o Down time for collection period 1/1/85 to 1/8/85 was 1.0 hour0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> due to pump breakdown.
o Low air volume for collection period 6/4/85 to 6/11/85 was due to localized atmospheric variations.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to filter loading caused by localized atmospheric conditions.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
i o Low air volume for collection period 11/5/85 to 11/12/85.
o Down time for collection period 12/10/85 to 12/17/85 and .
J 12/17/85 to 12/24/85 was 88.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> due to vacuum pump / motor failure.
4 Air Sampler #5 Units 2/3 Switchyard o Down time for collection period 8/20/85 to 8/27/85 was due to loading of filter caused by nearby construction.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to filter loading caused by localized atmospheric conditions.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
Air SamDier #6 Unit 1 Met Tower i o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.25 i hours due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation. '
s O
G-3 LO
, Air Samoler #7 AWS Roof o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
l I
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
' Air Sampler #9 South Beach Park o Low air volume for collection period 2/26/85 to 3/5/85, less-than-usual volume.
o Down time for collection period 4/30/85 to 5/7/85 was 2.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />.
o Low air volume for collection period 6/4/85 to 6/11/85 was due i to localized atmospheric variations, o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to filter loading caused by localized atmospheric conditions, j o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.20
- hours due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
1 i o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to 1 filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions. '
o Low air volume for collection period 11/5/85 to 11/12/85.
j Air Samoler #10 Bluff
! o Down time for collection period 2/5/85 to 2/12/85 was 3.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> l- due to power loss.
- o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to
! power loss. Down time for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85
) was 88.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />.
o Unit out of service due to loss of power during the collection period 10/8/85 to 10/15/85. Down time for collection period 10/8/85 to 10/15/85 was 168.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85' to 10/22/85 was 76.7 !
hours. '
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.55 hours6.365741e-4 days <br />0.0153 hours <br />9.093915e-5 weeks <br />2.09275e-5 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation.
i
, o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to
! filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
i i
O i
i w --- - ..-.- - - -__.-- ..--._ -
G-4 O Air Sampler #11 Mesa E.O.F.
o Down time for collection period 4/16/85 to 4/23/85 was 26.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> due to power outage.
o Down time for collection period 5/14/85 to 5/21/85 was 15.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> due to an outage of breaker 2A03.
o Low air volume for collection period 10/1/85 to 10/8/85 due to filter loading caused by localized atmospheric conditions.
o Down time for collection period 10/15/85 to 10/22/85 was 0.18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> due to changeout of calibrated instrumentation, a
o Low air volume for collection period 10/29/85 to 11/5/85 due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
1 o Down time for collection period 12/24/85 to 12/31/85 was 1.0 hour0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> due to suspected power outage. Low air volume was due to filter loading caused by atmospheric conditions.
- b. Drinkina Water Drinking water samples of San Clemente Gulf Course were all taken from well No. 3 during 1985. Well 40. 6 is still under repair.
O' c. Direct Radiation o The quarterly TLD changeout was performed with the only discrepancy being the loss of TLD #5 (Camp Las Pulgas, Camp Pendleton). This occurred due to base personnel moving the telephone pole on which TLD No. 5 was located.
o TLD #23 (San Clemente General Hospital) was moved along with the associated Pole (May 15, 1985). It was discovered that the TLD had been taken down due to pole being moved. The TLD reported movement was 300 feet.
o TLD #52 (Vista Fire Station) loss due to removal of utility pole from which TLD was hung.
o TLD #5 ( Annual Lif Dosimeter) was lost during the second quater of 1985.
o TLD #59 (SONGS Met Tower) quarterly calcium sulfate dosimeter read 104.0 mrem and the annual Lif dosimeter read 174.8 mrem.
This was due to presence of a radwaste truck parked 20 feet away from this TLD location in the last week of December.
O
G-5 O d. Beach Sand
- e. Local Croos No leafy vegetabits were obtainable at either location - thus fleshy
! vegetables were substituted.
- f. Soil Sampling Part II. Marine Samplina
- a. Ocean Water Samplina l
- b. Non-Micratory Marine Animals
, ) Unit 1 fish samples, California sheephead and Pile Perch and Units 2/3 Opaleye were caught at a later time and in the second quarter j and shipped on 7/8/85 rather than 6/3/85.
- c. Kelo No samples were obtained from barn kelp bed in the second semi-annual sampling period of November 1985. This kelp bed did not exist at the time of sampling.
- d. Ocean Bottom Sediments i
! Ocean bottom sediments for Unit 1 East of outfall and Unit 2 outfall i were collected at some later time in the second quarter.
i 1
O 1
1
. - - . - - - . - , . - - - - - - - , , . _ - - . . . - . , -- . - - , _ , - - , , . . _ , - - - - - - . - . . - - . , . . - . - = , - - - , . . , , - , - . _ - , - , , - , - - - , - , - . . . . -
i l
I i
I i
i t
I APPENDIX H i
LAND USE CENSUS 1
1 l
l i
l 1
l 1
l 1
f.
i I
I 4
4 1
l i
f i
1
H -1 O INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose Of The Land Use Census A land use census company was assigned to conduct the 1985 Land Use Census of the area within a five-mile radius of Southern California Edison Company's San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS).
The overall objective of this census is to identify radiological pathways to man. The purpose of this census is to locate and document the nearest residences, milk animals, meat animals, gardens (of at least 500 square feet producing fleshy or leafy vegetables), and other specified uses (campgrounds, employment, etc.), in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within five miles of SONGS, to be updated annually. All such uses within the study area are identified, not only the nearest. Additionally, information on how long a person or persons will be at closest (and certain other) non-residential uses is collected. This information is required by SONGS Unit 1 Technical Specifications Section 3.18.2 and Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications Section 3/4.12.2, Land Use Census.
1.2 Definition Of Uses Residence is defined as any structure (single family house, apartment, mobile home, barracks or similar type unit), which is occupies by an individual (s) or O resident (s) for three months (2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />) or longer in a given year.
Other SDecified Use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population as other than their primary residence. The use is divided l
into two categories: employment and non-employment related. '
Employment use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population engaged in normal work activities regardless of the length of time spent at the location, or its permanence. This use includes concession stands, restaurants, markets and guard shacks.
Non-employment related use is defined as a location occupied by members of the general population who are not engaged in normal work activities. This use includes campgrounds, temporary housing, timeshare condominiums, motels, hotels, schools and beaches.
Milk animals are cows, goats or sheep, whose milk is used in dairy products for human consumption.
Meat animals are cattle, goats or sheep, whose meat is used for human consumption.
Fresh, leafy veaetables include examples such as lettuce, cabbage and spinach. Other vegetables, known as " fleshy" vegetables, were also included in the census. Fleshy veaetables include tomatoes, cucumbers, cauliflower and sweet corn.
i H-2 FINDINGS The results of the 1985 SONGS Land Use census are summarized in this part of the report in two ways.
First, to give an overview of the nearest uses in the study area, findings are reported by each of the use categories identified as: residents, vegetables, milk animals, meat animals and other specified. This section also overviews the water resources in the study area.
Second, uses are identified on a sector by sector basis. For each sector, other specified uses are discussed to provide information for dose calculations. The sector analysis concludes with a summary of nearest uses on SCE Form 26-184, in fulfillment of project requirements (Tables H-1 and H-2).
2.1 SCE 26-184 Findings By Use Category Residences San Clemente - Cotton Point (former Nixon residence), located directly north of San Mateo Point (Sector P), is the closest residence at 2.8 miles frcm SONGS.
Camp Pendleton - Camp Pendleton has the closest residences in Sectors Q, R. A, C. O and E, as follows:
- 1. San Onofre Heights (single family homes); Sector Q; 1.5 miles from SONGS.
l 2. San Onofre Mobile Home Park (mobile homes on foundations); Sector R; 1 1.3 miles from SONGS.
- 3. Camp San Mateo (barracks); Sector A; 3.6 miles from SONGS.
- 4. Camp San Onofre (barracks); Sectors C and 0; 2.6 miles from SONGS in Sector C; 2.8 miles in Sector D.
- 5. Camp Horno (barracks); Sector E; 4.0 miles from SONGS.
Veaetable Gardens The San Clemente Ranch is a private business under a long-term lease in an area of north Camp Pendleton (Sectors Q and R). The ranch produces fleshy vegetables: tomatoes, cucumbers and sweet corn in the summer and cauliflower l in the winter. The ranch is 2.2 miles from SONGS in Sector Q, and 2.3 miles from SONGS in Sector R.
! Milk Animals No instances of milk animals were identified in the 5-mile study area.
O l
-_ -- , , - _,.,_ ,- ,__, _ _ _ . , ,- ,__-,_,v_- . . - . - , , ,- - - . - , _ _ , - y - , - - - -
. - . . . . . - . _ _ . . =_ - - -- . . _ - - . . - - - . .. . -
l
!O Meat Animals l Sheep are grazed in Sectors Q, R, A, 8, C, D, E, F and G between January and June or July under a lease agreement between the Marine Corps and a private j Livestock firm. Approximately 4,000 sheep, raised for meat purposes, are j grazed within the five mile radius. No animals were sighted this year.
1 Distances from SONGS are 1.6 miles in Sector Q, 0.9 miles in Sector 4, 0.2 l miles in Sectors A, B, C and 0, 0.3 miles in Sector E, 0.5 miles in Sector F, and 2.7 miles in Sector G.
Other Specified
)
San Onofre Beach (Surf Beach). Surf Beach is a day-use area; use of the are is confined to parking along the beach and beach use. The beach is 0.4 miles from SONGS in Sector P.
State' Park Office Trailer. An office trailer used for administrative purposes
, is located in a maintenance yard, .6 miles from SONGS in Sector Q.
I i San Clemente Ranch. The Ranch parking and shipping area is located 2.6 miles
] from SONGS in Sector R.
Gas Station. A gas station on Camp Pendleton is located 4.1 miles f rom SONGS in Sector A.
Sanitary Landfill. A S&nitary landfill serving Camp Pendleton is located 2.1
! miles from SONGS in Sector B. The landfill is a disposal site for solid waste i generated by Camp Pendleton.
Camp San Onofre Sewage Treatment Plant. The plant is located 2.2 miles from SONGS in Sector C.
i Camp Horno Sewage Treatment Plant. The plant is located 3.7 miles from SONGS I in Sector 0.
i San Onofre State Beach and Park. The guard shack for the Park is located 0.8 j miles from SONGS in Sector F. The beach campground is located 0.8 miles from SONGS in Sector G.
J l Water Resources
$ The water resources in the study area are shown on the composite California i Department of Water Resources map. The area is characterized by many
- intermittent streams which run when it rains, but are normally dry. There are i no permanent running streams or rivers in the study area, and virtually no permanent natural or man-made lakes or ponds. Some water is pumped by wells, butmuchofthewaterforhumanconsumptionisbrougt)tinfromoutsidesources.
< e O
4 e- -we--r-w e,nv v -, ,e ., ems--, www - ,--n,,,- wgm ,.e w- w . w ee.n. --mwo--.wrm-e-.sw---.. o. .-..me,.re- r+~~v-m-~~~~,--w----,-er,--w-v--,--- -
!O j 2.2 Findings By Sector Proceeding clockwise from Sector P, each of the 16 meteorological sectors in
- f. the study area are discussed below.
l Sector P (West Northwest) 1 This sector is mainly the Pacific Ocean but includes a sliver of land 4 contained Enlisted Beach (military), San Onofre State Beach (public), and U.S.
! Coast Guard Loran Tracking Station at San Mateo Point, and the westernmost tip of the City of San Clemente.
Residences The closest residential use to SONGS is Cotton Point (former Nixon
- Estate), now owned by Mr. Gavin Herbert. He has subdivided the property into seventeen improved home sites ready for construction. Mr. Herbert uses the house on an irregular basis, but a guard lives in a guest houc on a permanent j basis. Additional housing is found north of the areas in the Cyprus Shore development.
Gardens. Milk and Meat Animals No instances of these uses are found in Sector P.
Other Specified San Onofre Beach (Surf Beach) is the closest use to the SONGS ,
j facility. It is a day-use area exclusively; use is confined to parking and ,
beach use. In conversations with Hal Doerksen, Chief Ranger for the Pendleton y Coast Area, it was verified that daily use at peak season (July 4) is about 500 cars and 3 persons per car, or a total of 1,500 persons. Lifeguard f' stations and change rooms are located along the beach. Exhibit 8 shows a view of Surf Beach. Employment uses on the beach include mobile (in jeeps) and stationary (in towers) lifeguards. Total high season staffing for all beaches (Surf Beach, San Onofre State Beach, Trestles Beach and San Clemente State Beach) is 16 lifeguards. Each guard works 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day (40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per j week), so a worst case exposure time is 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week at the closest i point. No estimate of lifeguard time on individual beaches is possible as
! assignments are constantly rotated. :
l 1
Enlisted Beach is a Marine recreation area and contains approximately 100 l l camping spaces and 10 mobile homes on foundations. The camping spaces are l 4 occupied by mobile homes, RV's, trailers and tents. Maximum stay at the
- campground is two weeks. Capacity of the camping area is approximately 420 j persons. Only a small portion of this area is contained within Sector P --
the majority is found in Sector Q. Sector P does contain a trailer containing the campground check-in. The Marines Special Services Department (in charge of the beach) was unable to provide estimates of staffing and hours at the
- beach. The portion of the San Onofre State Park north of Enlisted Beach, j known as Trestles Beach, is a day-use area. Visitors park east of the San
- Diego Freeway and walk to the beach. The peak day-use of this area is i approximately 2,000 persons, i I lO f
H-5 O A lookout tower and communications center is located above Trestles Beach.
The same State Park employee sleeps overnight at the lookout tower for an average of two nights a week for the summer season (four or five months a year).
- The San Mateo Point Loran Coast Guard Station contains a guest house, which is used by Coast guard employees for vacation purposes. The maximum length of stay is 7 days; the facility is used all year round and is occupied 90 percent of the time. Also located in this portion of the site are a recreation building, garage / storage building, bathhouse / change room and camping area for a maximum of three groups for up to three days. The estimate of the average monthly use of the camping facilities during the summer months is 24 persons per month.
Sector 0 (Northwest)
This Sector contains the northeast 31f of some of the uses identified in Sector P. as well as major garden, residential and other specified areas.
Residences The closest residential use in Sector Q is new housing construction in San Onofre. Heights, a military housing project. Approximately 330 new units will be available for occupancy in September 198!!, This sector also covers a large port 1on of the City of San Clemente. The city is primarily residential with sore institutional, commercial and recreational A uses. Total population is about 30,800 persons. <
Gardens The closest agricultural use greater than 500 square. feet h San Clemente Ranch.
There is no land explicitly devoted to agricultural use in the City of San Clemente. Most developed residential lots are small, precluding large (500+
square foot) garden. However, four gardens greater than 500 square feet were located on vacant lots during the windshield survey of the city. There are a significant number of empty vacant lots which could be converted to gardens.
Trie first garden is located at 238 Avenida Montalvo and is estimated to be 625 square feet. Leafy and fleshy vegetables are being grown.
The second garden is located at 146 West Avenida Junipero. The site is estimated to be 1.600 square feet, and producing leafy and fleshy vegetables.
~
The third garden 1s located at 5 West Avenida San Antonio and is estimated to be 1,200 square feet. Leafy and finshy vegetables are being produced.
The fourth garden is located at 103 Esplanade and is estimated to be 1,700
' square feet. The site is producing leafy and fleshy vegetables.
Additional gardens between 250 and 500 square feet were identified at the following locations:
O e r
l H-6 l
l
- 1. Between 215 and 219 Avenida Santa Barbara; approximately 325 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
- 2. Between 145 and 153 West Avenida Junipero; approximately 375 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
- 3. Between 135 and 139 Avenida Buena Ventura; approximately 400 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
- 4. At 136 Avenida Victoria; approximately 250 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
'5. At 131 Avenida Mateo; approximately 325 square feet; fleshy vegetables.
- 6. At 2405 Calle Madiera; approximately 275 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
- 7. At 204 East Avenida Ramona; approximately 300 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
- 8. At 2119 Entrada Paraiso; approximately 350 square feet; leafy and fleshy vegetables.
These locations are not mapped because they are below the threshold.
O Additional gardens were identified less than 250 square feet, and it is probable that more are located out of site in backyards.
Milk No instances of milk or meat animals were identified in Sector Q.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See the Findings by Use Category for more details.
Other Specified The closest other specified use to SONGS is a State Park trailer located in a maintenance yard. The use is designated employment related and contains administrative offices which are used infrequently for a l maximum of five to eight hours per week by one or two persons.
A portion of San Onofre Beach is located in this sector, which includes the entrance to the beach. The entrance is manned by one or two State Park employees for ten hours a day. Employees work a maximum of 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week.
The narrative in Sector P outlines the uses of the portion of Enlisted Beach located in Sector Q.
The Enlisted Beach Recreation building is located in this sector. A small portion of Trestles Beach is found in Sector Q (see Sector P for details).
The portion of Sector Q north of the San Diego Freeway contains Edison land uses and the Marine's commercial and guard station uses. The commercial l center contains a retail outlet and gas station which are open 7 days a week 1
__ _ - ._. _ _ . =_
i H-7 O for 8 to 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> a day. Maximum employee time at the site is 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per i week. The guard station at Basilone Road is manned by one marine 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day. The typical duty shift is 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br />, and duty is rotated so maximum amount of time for one person is a one day shif t (about 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per week).
San Clemente State Park is located within the City of San Clemente. It contains administrative offices for the Pendleton Coast Area, permanent ,
residences consisting of 7 houses and 11 trailers, and a campground area. The administrative offices are staffed by 11 employees for 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week each. Daily peak use of the park (based on a hypothetical July 4th) has been estimated as follows:
Campers: 157 x 3.5 persons per camper 550 Day Use: 830 autos x 3 persons per auto 2,514 Daily Use: Auto / walk-in 215
" Bike 'n Hike" users 11 TOTAL 3,290 The San Clemente Ranch administrative offices are in this area. The offices are staffed by 3 to 4 employees for up to 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per week.
The City of San Clemente has several commercial area. The primary area is along El Camino Real and extends the length of the study area. Other areas are a gas station and two beach concession stands operated by the City of San O Clemente. Operating only during the summer months, the beach concession stands are open 7 days a week. Maximum amount of time at the site is 50 to 60 hours6.944444e-4 days <br />0.0167 hours <br />9.920635e-5 weeks <br />2.283e-5 months <br /> per week for the operators. The stands also have several part-time employees. Non-employment related uses in the City include several schools
- and a time share condominium complex.
Sector R (North Northwest)
Residences The closest residential use to SONGS is the San Onofre Mobile Home Park, a military housing project.
A portion of San Onofre Heights (see narrative in Sector Q) extends into this sector.
The northern and most recently-constructed portion of the San Clemente residential area lies in Sector R; a fairly substantial stock of serviced, but as yet undeveloped, lots exist.
Gardens The San Clemente Ranch is the closest garden of over 500 square feet in Sector R. This includes a non-contiguous portion of land along San Mateo Road. The crops grown in these areas are the same as Sector Q. An Avocado Grove is located in the City of San Clemente and is estimated to cover one-half acre.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector R.
O
H-8 Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings by Use Category) for more details.
Other Specified The closest other specified use to SONGS is the San Clemente Ranch parking and shipping area. This area is designated commercial. The use includes two guards who live permanently at the site and up to 120 employees working 12 to 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per day (70 hours8.101852e-4 days <br />0.0194 hours <br />1.157407e-4 weeks <br />2.6635e-5 months <br /> per week) during harvest time.
Edison land uses are located in this sector. The Camp San Mateo Sewage Treatment Plant is manned by one employee for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day (40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week). A guard shack guarding the Cristianitos Road entrance to Camp Pendleton is manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day. The typical duty shift is 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br />, and duty is rotated so maximum amount of time for one person is about 11 hours1.273148e-4 days <br />0.00306 hours <br />1.818783e-5 weeks <br />4.1855e-6 months <br /> per week.
Sector A (North)
Residences The closest residential use to SONGS is Camp San Mateo, a military camp.
Gardens No instances of gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector A.
Milk Animals No instances of milk animals were identified in Sector A.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings by Use Category) for more details.
Other Specified The closest other specified use in this sector is a gas station on Camp Pendleton. The station is staffed by 1 person for 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> per day, 5 days a week (35 hours4.050926e-4 days <br />0.00972 hours <br />5.787037e-5 weeks <br />1.33175e-5 months <br /> per week).
i The Cristianitos Fire Station is manned by rotating crews of four civilian firefighters. Firefighters work an average of 13 shifts per month, at 24 l
hours per shift. This averages to 70 hours8.101852e-4 days <br />0.0194 hours <br />1.157407e-4 weeks <br />2.6635e-5 months <br /> per week per firefighter. ,
Personnel is assigned to a station for about 2 years. Edison land uses are I located in this area.
Sector B (North Northeast)
Residences No instances of residential uses were identified in Sector B.
Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector B.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector B.
l Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings by Use l Category) for more details.
O G
H-9 O Other SDecified A sanitary landfill serving Camp Pendleton is the closest i
other specified use in Sector B. The site is manned by one equipment operator for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day (40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week).
The Northern Impact Control Tower is staf fed for 12 to 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per day by a rotating crew of 7 marines (12 to 14 hours1.62037e-4 days <br />0.00389 hours <br />2.314815e-5 weeks <br />5.327e-6 months <br /> per week per person). The tower controls use of the firing ranges in the north Camp Pendleton area. The only permanently-staffed firing range in the study area is manned by two marines for 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week.
Sector C (Northeast)
Residences The closest residential use in this sector is Camp San Onofre.
Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector C.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector C.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings of Use Category) for more details.
Other SDecified The closest other specified use in Sector C is the Camp San Onofre Sewage Treatment Plant. The plant is manned by one person for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day (40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week).
The Camp San Onofre Fire Station is manned by rotating crews of four civilian firefighters. Firefighters work an average of 13 shifts per month, at 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per shift. This averages to 70 hours8.101852e-4 days <br />0.0194 hours <br />1.157407e-4 weeks <br />2.6635e-5 months <br /> per week per firefighter.
Personnel is assigned to a station for about 2 years.
Sector 0 (East Northeast)
Residences The closest residential use in this sector is Camp San Onofre.
Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector D.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector D.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings of Use Category) for more details.
Other Soecified The closest other specified use in Sector 0 1s the Camp Horno Sewage Treatment Plant. The plant is staffed by one person for 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day (40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week).
Sector E (East)
Residences The closest residential use to SONGS is Camp Horno.
O
H-10l l
l O Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector E.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector E.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings of Use Category) for more details.
Other SDecified No instances of these uses were identified in Sector E.
Sector F (East Southeast)
Residences No residential uses were identified in Sector F.
Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector F.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector F.
Meat Animals Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings of Use Category) for more details.
Other SDecified The closest other specified use to SONGS is the San Onofre State Beach guard shack. The use is designated employment related. The shack is manned by one or two employees for 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> a day. Maximum time per employee is 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week.
South of the guard shack is Tony's Market, located in a trailer. The market is open 65 hours7.523148e-4 days <br />0.0181 hours <br />1.074735e-4 weeks <br />2.47325e-5 months <br /> per week and is staffed by three employees on rotating shifts (22 hours2.546296e-4 days <br />0.00611 hours <br />3.637566e-5 weeks <br />8.371e-6 months <br /> per week per person). The part also has a campground. Peak season daily use of the campground (which also extends to Sector G) is as follows:
Campers (Bluffs area): 214 campers x 3.5 persons 843 per camper Day use walk-in visitors: 600 x 3 persons per car 1,800 Day use walk-in visitors: 100 TOTAL 2,743 These figures are based on a hypothetical July 4th weekend. The maximum length of stay in summer months is 15 days (30 days in the winter).
A Highway Patrol Weigh Station and Border Patrol checkpoint are located on the east side of the San Diego Freeway. The Border Patrol Checkpoint is manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day, 365 days per year; the maximum length of stay for one person is 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br /> per week. Total employment at the site is 90 persons, with 25 on the site at any one time. There is also holding facilities for up to 100 aliens which may be detailed for 7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br /> before being transported south. The Weigh Station is open during the day and periodically at night; the maximum length of stay for one persone is 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week. Staffing levels vary.
H-11 l
O Sector G (Southeast)
Residences No residential uses were identified in Sector G.
Gardens No gardens greater than 500 square feet were located in Sector G.
Milk Animals No milk animals were identified in Sector G.
Meat Animah Sheep are grazed in this sector. See Section 2 (Findings by Use Category) for more details.
! Other SDecified The closest other specified use to SONGS is San Onofre State Park and Beach Campground (see narrative in Sector F).
A Highway Patrol Weigh Station is located on the west side of the San Diego Freeway and is open during the day and periodically at night. The maximum length of stay for one employee is 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per week.
Sectors H. J. K. L. M. N Sectors H. J. K, L. M and N do not contain any of the land uses in question.
These sectors contain only a small portion of the plant site, a public beach and beach walkway. The beach walkway provides an access path between beaches north and south of the plant.
O O
s v MXOS 1 LAto USE CENSUS
SUMMARY
StEET (FIVE MILE HADIUS)
DATE: August 30, 1985 All Nearest Nearest Meat & Milk Land Nearest Other Specified Vegetable Garden Animals (Specify Use Residence ( 2.000 hrs /rr) Uses (Specif y Leair or Fleshy) Meat or Milk Prockscina)
Sector Location Location Location Location (221/2") (miles) Description (miles) Description (miles) Description (miles) Description 2.6 Cotton Point .2 Surf Beach -- --
West Northwest (P) (Nixon Estate) 1.4 San Onofre .5 State Park 1.9 San Clemente --
hthwest (0) lleights (new) Office Trailer Ranch 1.2 San Onofre 2.4 San Clerete 2.0 San Clemente 1.4 Heat Animals hth hthwest (R) Mobile llomes Ranch Packing Ranch
- 3. 5 " Camp San Mateo 3.5 Sewage Treat- --
.7 Heat Animals Wth (A) ment Facility 2.1 Sanitary --
.7 Meat Animals
%fh Northeast (B) Landfill a
2.7 Camp San Onofre 2.3 Sewage Treat- --
.3 Meat Animals E wtheast (C) ment Facility E 2.9 Camp San Onofre 3.9 Sevage Treat- --
.3 Meat Animals z East Northeast (D) ment Facility M 4.2 Camp llorno -- --
.4 Meat Animals East (E) 1.0 San Onofre Bch --
.7 Meat Animals East Southeast (F) Guard Shack 1.3 San Onofre Bch --
3.1 Meat Animals Southeast (C)
NOTES: a. All distances in statute miles from SONGS 'l site reference point (Unit 1 Plant Vent Stack).
- b. All sectors inclode 221/20with "A" sector centered on True N eh.
- c. A " residence" is a location occupied by m Individual 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> or more in a year.
1 f
U V tANI)U$f Ct S DA Af tY 56 5 t_1 p'IVt. MILE ItAugus)
DATE: _ August 30, 1985 All t harest Nearest Meat & Milk 1 Land Nearest Other Specified Vegetable Garden Animols (Specify Use Residence ( 2.000 tus/re) Uses (Specif y Leafr or Fleshr) Meat or Milk Producina)
Sector Localian Location Location Locotion 8
(miles) Description (miles) Description (miles) Description (miles) Descripalon (22 1/2 )
2.8 Cotton Point .4 Surf Beach ~~ ~~
West Nor:La. (P) (Nixon Estate) 1.5 San Onofre .6 State Park 2.2 San Clemente 1.6 Heat Animals
%thwest (O) Heights (new) Office Traiter Ranch 1.3 San Onofre 2.6 San Clemente 2.3 San Clemente .9 Heat Animals Mobile Homes Ranch Packing Ranch
%th b thwest (R) 3.6 Camp San 4.1 Cas Station --
.2 Heat Animals wth (A) Hateo 2.1 Sanitary
~
.2 Heat Animals
.and H
%th Northeast (B) _4 2.6 Camp San 2.2 Sewage Treat-
~
.2 Heat Animals E Northeast (C) Onofre ment Facility E 2.8 Camp San 3.7 Sewage Treat- .2 Heat Animals Y
~~ "
East Northeast (D) Onofre ment Facility j 4.0 Camp Horn -- --
.3 Heat Animals Ebst (E)
I __
.8 San Onofre Bch --
.5 Heat Animals East Southeast (F)
Cuard Shack
.8 San Onofre Bch
~
Campground --
2.7 Heat Animals Southeast (G)
NOTE $s e. All distances in statute miles from SONGS 2/3 site reference point (mid point of SONGS 2/3 containment building).
- b. All sectors include 221/20with "A" sector centered on True North.
- c. A Nesidence" is a locallas occupied by cn Individual 2,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> or more in a year.
- d. Underlined uses represent changes from 1984 survey.
?
O
a r -a- _ m_ J --.A. .a __ u -
t l
l i
I I
APPENDIX I DATA TABLES (RAW DATA) FOR 1985 i
i I
I I
i i
I l
[
- ~ .
l
I-Da LIST OF TABLES RAW DATA l
Table Number Page l
la Quarterly Gamma Exposure I-1 lb Annual Gamma Exposure I-2 2 Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity I-3 3 Weekly Radiciodine I-131 Activity I-8 4a Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamms I-13 Spectral Analysis 4c Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross I-15 Alpha and Strontium Activities 5 Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysis I-17 6 Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity I-21 7 Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritium Activity I-22 9a Monthly Drinking Water Analysis 1-23 9b Monthly Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha and Gross I-26 Beta Activities 9c Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Alpha and Gross I-27 Beta Activities 9d Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Solids Gross Alpha I-28 and Gross Beta Activities 9e Quarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysis 1-29 10 Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis I-30 11 Semi--Annual Ocean Bottom Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis I-31 l 12a Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Flesh) I-32 i 12b Quarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone) I-39 j i
l
. _ _ __ . ..- _ . =- _ - . - - . . . _ - . _ - . _ _ _ . , - - _ . _ - . _ _ . _ . - . - . . . _ - _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
! I-Ob i -
4 i
! LIST OF TABLES (Cont.)
RAW DATA I
l l
Table Number P_ age 13a Semi-Annual Local Crops Gamma Spectral Analysis I-45 1
. 13b Semi-Annual Local Crops Tritium and Strontium Activities I-46 ;
1 i 14 Annual Soil Analysis I-47 15 Semi-Annual Kelp Analysis I-48 i
a
)
I '
I i
r i
i l
t V
5 I
i i
r
,,,,,_r__m.,_,.._,-____,,,,.,,.,____,....,_-_..._._..--,..._-_._._.---,,_mm...._-,_,.----.-4 - . _ _ _
O O _
O' 158 38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled by: Du. v h C.blU '
Dates Y - /O -8(a Table 14 Guarterly Gamma Exposure
- Control Locations 314 Cbservat f on Number CalendarLocation Date 81 Location 82 Location 83 Location 34 Location 85 Location 86 Location 87 Location Location Location Location Location 88 39 510 811 812 i 41 03/31/85 20.6 23.4 20.4 21.2 m 17.2 20.1 19.8 20.0 20.5 42 06/30/85 20.1 24.7 20.4 22.3 21.4 16.5 19.9 19.4 18.3 43 09/30/85 19.6 23.9 20.0 20.7 21.6 20.9 21,3 19.3 44 20.4 20.7 16.4 20.2 19.7 20.6 21.5 20.8 20.1 12/31/85 19.9 25.0 21.4 21.9 21.3 17.3 20.1 21.1 21.0 21.5 20.7 20.8 Cbservation Number CalendarLocation Date 313 Location 814 Location 815 Location 316 Location 817 Location 818 Location 819 Location320 Location 821 Locatf on Location Location 822 823 824 41 03/31/85 18.2 21.1 18.5 18.3 11.5 11.9 20.9 20.4 20.3 19.1 42 06/30/85 17.9 22.6 18.3 18.3 9.7 9.4 21.2 21.0 20,3 22.5 20.4 43 09/30/85 18.3 23.7 18.4 19.4 10.8 10.9 19.7 23.1 20.6 44 12/31/85 18.1 22.6 21.8 21.6 20.0 24.5 21.5 23.0 21.8 19.6 10.5 10.2 22.1 22.1 21.0 19.9 20.9 21.9 Cbs;rvation Humber CalendarLocation Date 325 Location 326 Location 327 Location 828 Location 829 Location 8 30 Location 831 Location 332 Location 333 Location Location Location 834 835 836 41 03/31/85 20.1 20.8 18.9 21.0 21.2 20.0 20.4 18.9 19.8 19.4 42 06/30/85 19.2 20.1 18.5 20.5 21.0 21.1 21.5 18.2 21.0 43 09/30/85 21.8 19.6 17.9 19.6 19.4 19.2 22.3
! 21.9 22.5 23.9 22.0 22.2 21.0 22.2 20.7 21.4 44 12/31/85 20.5 21.3 19.7 22.1 22.9 22.2 22.6 21.1 24.8 22.6 20.7 19.8 23.1 Chservation Number CalendacLocation Date 837 Location 338 Location 839 Location 340 Location 341 Location 342 Location 843 Location 844 Location 345 Location Location Location 346 847 848 41 03/31/85 21.8 15.7 19.5 21.0 19.3 23.8 18.9 17.8 18.5 15.5 42 06/30/85 23.7 16.1 21.0 22.1 19.3 24.9 17.4 18.8 43 09/30/85 24.9 17.0 19.1 18.0 19.0 15.9 18.2 19.3 20.5 23.0 20.4 26.0 18.6 18.5 19.1 16.1 18.8 j 44 12/31/85 23.5 16.3 21.4 22.9 19.9 22.8 19.1 18.8 20.5 19.2 16.3 18.1 19.7 Gbservation Humber Calendar Date Location 849 Location 850 Location 851 Location 352 Location 853 Location 354 Location 355 Location 856 Location Location Location '
857 858 859 41 03/31/85 18.9 17.7 17.8 18.3 '
42 18.1 19.5 26.6 25.9 23.2 20.6 21.3 06/30/85 19.4 18.1 17.6 18.7 18.0 19.7 26.6 23.3 4
43 09/30/85 20.7 19.6 18.8 19.2 21.9 22.1 21.9 44 12/31/85 18.5 21.0 26.7 23.3 22.4 22.7 22.7
- 19.5 18.9 18.3 m 19.1 20.3 25.1 22.5 22.7 22.6 104.0
) Observation Calendar Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location j Number Date #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 5
41 03/31/85 15.7 18.8 18.0 18.8 19.3 17.1 19.0 20.*5
- 42 06/30/85 15.6 19.4 19.1 19.6 20.2 18.3 19.6 21.9 I 43 09/30/85 16.8 21.8 21.4 22.0 22.1 20.6 21.9 23.9 44 12/31/85 15.7 20.6 20.0 20.0 21.1 19.1 20.3 22.0
! N=4 *
~
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 2 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled by b. O- Dates b lo- A G Table Ibn Annual Gamma Exposure Control Location 814 obsHumber rvation CalendarLocation Data Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location El 32 83 34 35 36 37 88 89 810 311 312 11 12/31/85 76.4 101.5 90.2 87.9 m 66.1 81.9 87.6 86.1 93.2 88.5 87 obs:rvation Number CalendarLocation 313 Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Date 314 315 316 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 324 11 12/31/85 78.1 98.9 82.4 79.8 36.8 41.7 96.2 82.5 83.7 85.4 99.3 89.5 Obscrvation Number CalendacLocation 325 Location 326 Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Date 827 328 829 830 831 332 333 334 835 336 11 12/31/85 89.6 85.4 77.9 83.7 89.5 90.2 97.1 82.4 88.8 86.1 86.3 94.1 3bsHumber rvation CalendarLocation Date 337 Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location 338 839 840 841 342 843 344 845 846 847 848 11 12/31/85 104.6 70 93.3 89.4 80.4 101.6 74.5 76.1 78.8 67.6 68 74.4 obsrrvation Humber Calendar Date Location 849 Location 350 Location 351 Location 852 Location 853 Location 854 Location Location Location Location Location 855 856 857 358 359 11 12/31/85 77.8 71.4 72.6
- 74.6 82 115.5 100.9 94.3 95.6 174.8 4
Observation Calendar Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Location Number Date #60 #61 #62 #63 #64 #65 #66 #67 11 12/31/85 65.3 85.2 83.7 88.7 97.3 94.5 83.4 93.1 N=1 e
ro O O O
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8,1986 3 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings vertfled by: 1x>. pa d LLD nate 4 - 1o- FL Table 2: Heekly Airborne Particulates Gross Seta Activity control Location 83 observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 32 Location 82 Location 33 Location 83 (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma)
Number Date 1363 01/01/85 0.015 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.034 0.001 1364 01/08/85 0.017 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.018 0.001 1365 01/15/85 0.019 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.024 0.001 1366 01/22/85 0.029 0.001 0.034 0.001 0.039 0.002 l
1367 01/29/85 0.028 0.001 0.038 0.001 0.013 0.001 1368 02/05/85 0.017 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.015 -
0.001 1369 02/12/85 0.022 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.031 0.001 1370 02/19/85 0.024 0.001 0.025 0.001 0.027 0.001 i
1371 02/26/85 0.025 0.001 0.027 0.001 0.0 20 0.001 1372 03/05/85 0.020 0.001 0.028 0.001 0.020 0.001 1373 03/12/85 0.011 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.011 0.001
- 1374 03/19/85 0.017 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.017 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 34 Location 84 Location SS Location 85 Location 86 Location 86 (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) i Number Date 1363 01/01/85 0.024 0.001 0.029 0.001 0.016 0.001 1364 01/08/85 0.018 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.016 0.001
- 1365 01/15/85 0.020 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.027 0.001 1366 01/22/85 0.040 0.001 0.034 0.001 0.029 0.001 l
1367 01/29/85 0.035 0.001 0.033 0.001 0.0 30 0.001 0.001 i 1368 02/05/85 0.019 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.016 i 1369 02/12/85 0.021 0.001 0.029 0.001 0.044 0.002
'l 1370 02/19/85 0.027 0.001 0.029 0.001 0.0 20 0.001 1
1371 02/26/85 0.027 0.001 0.031 0.002 0.022 0.001 1372 03/05/85 0.023 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.001 1373 03/12/85 0.011 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.001
]
1374 03/19/85 0.019 0.001 0.015 0.001 0.014 0.001 I
Observation Calendar Location 39 Location 310 Location 511 Location 89 Location 810 Location 811 4
Number Date (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 sigma) j 1363 01/01/85 0.022 0.022 0.021 0.001 0.001 0.001 1364 01/08/85 0.018 0.012 0.023 0.001 0.001 0.001 1365 01/15/85 0.024 0.024 0.025 0.001 0.001 0.001 1366 01/22/85 0.038 0.037 C.048 0.001 0.001 0.002 1367 01/29/85 0.026 0.031 0.032 0.001~ 0.001 0.001 1368 02/05/85 0.012 0.017 0.021 0.001 0.001 0.001 1369 02/12/85 0.014 0.021 0.023 0.001 . 0.001 0.001 1370 02/19/85 0.012 0.010 0.032 0.001 0.001 0.002 1371 02/26/85 0.024 0.025 0.028 0.002 0.001 0.002 i
1372 03/05/85 0.021 0.015 0.025 0.001 0.001 0.001 1373 03/12/85 0.010 0.012 0.011 0.001 0.001 0.001 1374 03/19/85 0.017 0.011 0.025 0.001 0.001 0.001 l
l .
- Y oa i
15:38 TUESIAY, APRIL 8, 1986 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listin5s Vertfled by: Du [th 0-- tid Dates '/- 8 0- FI, l Table 2: Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity l
Control Locations 33 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 82 Location 32 Location 33 Location 33 Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1375 03/26/85 0.017 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.034 0.002 1376 04/02/85 0.010 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.010 0.001 1377 04/09/85 0.014 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.021 0.001 1378 04/16/85 0.013 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.014 0.001 1379 04/23/85 0.011 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 1380 04/30/85 0.015 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.013 0.001 1381 05/07/85 0.016 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.016 0.001 1382 05/14/85 0.012 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.011 0 001 1383 05/21/85 0.016 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.020 0.001 1384 05/28/85 0.019 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.013 0.001 1385 06/04/85 0.011 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 1386 06/11/85 0.011 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.010 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 34 Location #4 Location SS Location 85 Location 36 Location 86 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1375 03/26/85 0.025 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.024 0.001 1376 04/02/85 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.011 0.001 1377 04/09/85 0.019 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.018 0.001 1378 04/16/85 0.020 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.020 0.001 1379 04/23/85 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.014 0.001 1380 04/30/85 0.019 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.017 0.001 1381 05/07/85 0.015 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.017 0.001 1382 05/14/85 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.010 0.001 1383 05/21/85 0.018 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.017 0.001 1384 05/28/85 0.020 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.017 0.001 1385 06/04/85 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.013 0.001 1386 06/11/85 0.011 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 29 Location 310 Location 311 Location 89 Location 310 Location 311 Humber Date (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 signa) 1375 03/26/85 0.013 0.024 0.025 0.001 0.001 0.001
. 1376 04/02/85 0.011 0.016 0.015 0.001 0.001 0.001 1377 04/09/85 0.010 0.022 0.032 0.001 0.001 0.002 1378 04/16/85 0.019 0.012 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.001 1379 04/23/85 0.012 0.011 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 1380 04/30/85 0.019 0.014 0.024 0.001 0.001 0.001 1381 05/07/85 0.016 0.015 0.018 0.001 , 0.001 -0.001 1382 05/14/85 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.001 0.001 0.001 1383 05/21/85 0.019 0.019 0.023 0.001 0.001 0.001 1384 05/28/85 0.019 0.015 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 1385 06/04/85 0.013 0.011 0.029 0.001 0.001 C.001 1386 06/11/85 0.011 0.015 0.016 0.001 0.001 0.001 ll e
8 S
9
15:38 TUESIAY. APRIL 8,1986 5 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorin5 Pro 5 ram Database Listin5s
- l Vertfled by: DJ-[h d6,hlid Dates O- /D - 5flo Table 2: Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Control Location 83 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 82 Location #2 Location 23 Location 83 Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sl5ma) 1387 06/18/85 0.016 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.024 0.001 1388 06/25/85 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.013 0.001 1389 07/02/85 0.019 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.019 0.001 1390 07/09/85 0.019 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.016 0.001 1391 07/16/85 0.011 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.015 0.001 1392 07/23/85 0.011 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.012 0.001 1393 07/30/85 0.018 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.020 0.001 1394 08/06/85 0.014 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.012 0.001 1395 08/13/85 0.014 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.019 0.001 1396 08/20/85 0.014 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.013 0.001 1397 08/27/85 0.019 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.022 0.001 1398 09/03/85 0.010 0.001 0.023 0.001 0.014 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 34 Location 34 Location 35 Location SS Location 36 Location 36 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1387 06/18/85 0.016 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.016 0.001 1388 06/25/85 0.014 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.010 0.001 1389 07/02/85 0.024 0.001 0.020 0.001 0.018 0.001 1390 07/09/85 0.021 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.018 0.001 1391 07/16/85 0.021 0.001 0.025 0.001 0.010 0.001 1392 07/23/85 0.016 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.014 0.001 1393 07/30/85 0.019 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.013 0.001 1394 08/06/85 0.015 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.011 0.001 1395
- 08/13/85 0.015 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.016 0.001 1396 08/20/85 0.016 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.001 1397 08/27/85 0.023 0.001 0.029 0.001 0.022 0.001 1398 09/03/85 0.021 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.021 0.001 ~
Observation Calendar Location 39 Location 810 Location 311 Location 39 Location 310 Location all Humber ' Date (2 stSma) (2 sigma) (2 sl5ma) 1387 06/18/85 0.020 0.019 0.018 0.001 0.001 0.001-1388 06/25/85 0.014 0.010 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 1389 07/02/85 0.014 0.017 0.016 0.001 0.001 0.001 1390 07/09/85 0.026 0.018 0.027 0.001 0.001 0.001 1391 07/16/85 0.020 0.021 0.018 0.001 0.001 0.001 1392 07/23/85 0.027 0.011 0.022 0.001 0.001 0.001 1393 07/30/85 0.013 0.020 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 1394 08/06/85 0.013 0.013 0.016 0.001 0.001 0.001 1395 08/13/85 0.015 0.016 0.019 0.001 e 0.001 0.001 1396 08/20/85 0.019 0.016 0.017 0.001 0.001 0.001 1397 08/27/85 0.010 0.021 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.001 1398 09/03/85 0.015 0.018 0.024 0.001 0.001 0.001
- P 74 m
15:38 TUES2AY, APRIL 8, 1986 i Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorin5 Program Database Listings Vertfled by: A W
>> 0. b./M Date: 4-/o- Flo l "i Table 2: Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity control Location 83 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 82 Location 82 Location 83 Location 83 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1399 09/10/85 0.010 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 1400 09/17/85 0.015 0.001 0.017 0.001 0:017 0.001 1401 09/24/85 0.013 0.001 0.019 0.001 0.024 0.001 1402 10/01/85 0.014 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.017 0.001 1403 10/05/85 0.029 0.002 0.032 0.002 0.045 0.003 1404 10/15/85 0.012 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.013 0.001 1405 10/22/85 0.019 0.001 0.025 0.001 0.030 0.002 1406 10/29/85 0.017 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.013 0.001 1407 11/05/85 0.028 0.002 0.041 0.002 0.052 0.003 1408 11/12/85 0.030 0.002 0.035 0.002 0.022 0.001 1409 11/19/85 0.020 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.027 0.001 1410 11/26/85 0.014 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.016 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 84 Location 85 Location 85 Location 86 Location 86 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 st5ma) 1399 09/10/85 0.011 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.014 0.001 1400 09/17/85 0.018 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.020 0.001 1401 09/24/85 0.018 0.001 0.021 0.001 0.013 0.001 1402 10/01/85 0.031 0.002 0.016 0.001 0.010 0.001 .
1403 10/08/85 0.039 0.002 0.051 0.003 0.016 0.001 1404 10/15/85 0.023 0.001 0.016 0.001 0.011 0.001 1405 10/22/85 0.029 0.002 0.031 0.002 0.024 0.001 1406 10/29/85 0.018 0.001 0.018 0.001 0.024 0.001 1407 11/05/85 ' O.035 0.002 0.026 0.002 0.027 0.002 1408 11/12/85 0.036 0.002 0.020 0.001 0.019 0.001 1409 11/19/85 0.024 0.001 0.022 0.001 0.016 0.001 1410 11/26/85 0.019 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.019 0.001 Observation Calendar Location 89 Location 310 Location 311 Location 89 Location 810 Location #11 Humber Date (2 si gma ) ( 2 sl 5ma ) (2 sigma) 1399 09/10/85 0.012 0.010 0.012 0.001 0.001 0.001 1400 09/17/85 0.012 0.025 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.001 1401 09/24/85 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.001 0.001 0.001 1402 10/01/85 0.019 0.017 0.021 0.001 0.001 0.001 1403 10/08/85 0.034 0.036 0.036 0.002 0.002 0.002 1404 10/15/85 0.019 m 0.025 0.001 m 0.001 1405 10/22/85 0.020 0.026 0.025 0.001
- 0.001 0.001 1406 10/29/85 0.020 0.019 0.025 0.001 0.001 0.001 1407 11/05/85 0.033 0.032 0.044 0.002 0.002 0.002 1408 11/12/85 0.034 0.028 0.038 0.002 0.001 0.002 1409 11/19/85 0.021 0.027 0.029 0.001 0.001 0.001 1410 11/26/85 0.018 0.021 0.027 0.001 0.001 0.001 e' _-
s .
e -
l
~
15:38 TUESDAY. APRIL 3,1986 7 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled by b fl? ^ -
0- 3 Date: Y-lD - E 7able 2: Weekly Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Control Location 83 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 81 Location 82 Location 82 Location 33 Location 83 Humber Date (2 sl5ma) (2 sigma) (2 signe) 1411 12/03/85 0.018 0.001 0.013 0.001 0.016 0.001 l 1412 12/10/85 0.012 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.010 0.001 1413 12/17/85 0.031 0.002 0.032 0.002 0.037 0.002 1414 12/24/85 0.021 0.001 0.029 0.001 0.028 0.001 1415 12/31/85 0.019 0.002 0.034 0.003 0.071 0.009 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 34 Location 35 Location SS Location 86 Location 86 Humber Date (2 sl5ma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1411 12/03/85 0.011 0.001 0.012 0.001 0.016 0.001 1412 12/10/85 0.010 0.001 0.014 0.001 0.010 0.001 1413 12/17/85 0.040 0.004 0.032 0.002 0.026 0.002 1414 12/24/85 0.014 0.001 0.025 0.002 0.021 0.002 1415 12/31/85 0.026 0.003 0.068 0.005 0.052 0.005 Observation Calendar Location 89 Location #10 Location 311 Location 89 Location 310 Location 311 Humber Date (2 sl5ma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 1411 12/03/85 0.013 0.013 0.015 0.001 0.001 0.001 1412 12/10/85 0.013 0.010 0.015 0.001 0.001 0.001 1413 12/17/85 0.027 0.039 0.034 0.001 0.002 0.002 1414 12/24/85 0.031 0.028 0.026 0.002 0.002 0.001 1415 12/31/85 0.036 0.039 0.037 0.003 0.004 0.004 N=53
'l e
~
i t G e I
es 1-6 .
- M en M O Wm M
a M
- C ***Mt**ttttt
- ** ** Om C00000000000
==
- g g ** *********
M M ************ M +499t+++++++ $UN g
a,
== 000000000000 WW = ** ******
==
WW N
C.00000000000
- Ow
.,a i
4 4 000000000000 000000000000 UN UN Ow ow
> a a 4 O Q M W es a las W 3 el M
- C *******ttttt
> C
= eB eB C 000000000000
==
- es &
W C C &W CC0000000000 M.e
- O O N M .J = C00000000000 = C00000000000 UN Ow M & W e N M .J W U U e o O O A J .J .J M &
- s I os a A C u m c3 OM ************
a se ~ w~ C00000000C00 I # ==
M O
e$
L C O
==
- ttttt C00000000000 C$
OM e t t e ntle t e t * *
- n
== 000000000000 UN WS **
O00000000000 L WW
- WW Ow D. = M 00000000C000 N 000000000000 .J G UN UN et & Ow Ow C 4 .J J
= A L M O M
= M S C et N til C O C O O MitlO O O O O O Q es as E = 0 C C C OOOON4&OOOOO = O.O*******
O O M C O O O.O* O* O
- 4 bb C00000000000 *
- .**....** s C00000000000 0 C to es n O W U U U J O
ll '
O O
.J .J J
- f. .
M 0
=d
> h L O e +
=a C
h d C H.
4 O Ce 3 O
Cm q
M.
C O O O O Olfl O O O O O O C i 9 OM ***tt******* OM 999teettt@449 O C00000000000 * *
= ** ***
M U == 000000000000 ==
g, t ( &W *W C.0 0 0 0 0.C.0 0 0 0 0 y C00000000000 m N 000000000000 N 000000000000 R U O UN UN O @s)MM M Ow J
Ow
.J O
J C I O M i W '
= E 1 V % C e Las a - M 4 j V 88 W 80 \
N V O
= 5 = C C COOOMOOOOOOO C O 000000000000 C00000000000 i
C = 0 0 0 l L tk - = CC0000000000 = O*****
O O O M N.O.O.O.O.O.O. = *** ****** .
O = V & & COOOMOOOOOOO # C00000000000
%. L N N N N
= 5 og U U U M > 0 0 0 4 h .J .J .J Q M Jd C W L W  l#1 Ifi Ifi lft aft lll ill M Ifi lit lll W 2 L lti M M Ifilf1Illill M ltllit Ltl Lt1 L  lit Rf) If1lllif18tllit lll111 lll gL as se es se se es se se se es se se g es se se se se se se se se se se se se ss se se se se se ce se se es es se se
- *= VW %%%%%%%%%%%% VW C#
%%%%%%%%%%%% VW %%%%%%%%%%%%
M eentlN DIf1N @ ettlN e CW M ee lf1 N @lf14d S e lf1 N D 3 M CW M eentlN Slfl N @ ditlN @
S4 OCMNNOMMNOMM O W sg COMNNOMMNOMM W4 OOMNNOMMNOMM em H
W MQ sg NNNNNNNNNNN% MQ MMMMMNNNNMMM e NNNNNNNNNNNN MMMMMNNNNMMM MQ N%%%%%%%%%%%% MMMMMNNNNMMM D G C00000000000 O 000000000000 O C0000o000000 f5 c C O
C O
O -L i
=L =L '
WW MS WW se n N ee D O N N M elf 14 N es re a NNNNMMMMMMMMM ee D O N N M titl 4 N et NA >EN eeNNNMMMMMMMMM
@ O M N M + ltl 4 N ee
>$ NNNMMMMMMMMM >S L3 Ill itl itt ill all itt iti til lfi lfi lfl ift L3 tri nfl atl lfi lli ttl itl itl efi ntl lft tfl L3 WZ Itllfi lflitt sfi ttilft stilf18tlift tfl WZ WZ W W W A D D O O O w
f
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 9 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorins Pro 5 ram Database Listin5s Vertfled bys h f- Date: Y-lO -9/o Table 3: Weekly Radiolodine I-131 Activity control Location 83 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 81 Location 82 Location 32 Location 83 Location 83 Humber Date (2 stSma) (2 sl5ma) (2 sl5 mal 539 03/26/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 540 04/02/85 0 D.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 541 04/09/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 542 04/16/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 543 04/23/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 544 04/30/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 545 05/07/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 546 05/14/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 547 05/21/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 548 05/28/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 549 06/04/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 550 06/11/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 84 Location 35 Location 85 Location 86 Location 86 Number Date (2 sl5ea) (2 st5ma) (2 stSma) 539 03/26/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 540 04/02/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 541 04/09/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 542 04/16/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 543 04/23/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 544 04/30/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 545 05/07/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 546 , 05/14/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 547 05/21/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 548 05/28/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 'O 0.04 549 06/04/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 550 06/11/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 Obsarvatloa Calendar Location 89 Location 310 Location 811 Location 89 Location 310 Location 311 Humber bata (2 sl5ma) (2 stSma) (2 sl5 mal 539 03/26/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 540 04/02/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 541 04/09/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 542 04/16/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 543 04/23/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 544 04/30/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 545 05/07/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 546 05/14/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 . 0.04 0.04 547 05/21/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 548 05/28/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 549 06/04/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 550 06/11/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 (P p e
2 I-10 e M se D M M W"
. M 4 C *****tteette se ma ma .O C.00000000000 g - = =
. .J C Ce &W C00000000000 g M O etett+9tteet om et*****dtett R cc ==== == 000000000000 UN g, pp O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O. #g Ow at N C00000000000 N 000000000000 .J UN UN
= Ow Ow
> .J .J t O s-e C e =~
g ;
se M
e e c[
O tt**********
C00000000000 M e C C "=
W "W C00000000000 m
M 3 y 000000000000 000000000000 Ow N
l 9 R N =J e U U N O O D .J .J N
a i S-g Q*
en N
ga ggN m
waR C[************
O C.00000000000 g ) CS We mQ O
Om tetttttttt**
=
Om
=
44t******tte N UN 000000000000 L pg C.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 we C.00000000000 Ow EL = N 000000000000 N 000000000000 .J G UN UN mW O= Ow C N .J .J
== Q L
O M M
.M= M N C et N m O es a C E - 0 000000000000 C C C ==
se . O O O &
R = == C00000000000 = C00000000000 N u 9 & M U e C en N N O i6 e s U U U .J
\j S O O O C J .J J O .
-e
=L- Q O
> > L C e e M + .oe W == C Wa Na W
> 0 #E h == 0 C CE C C M O ************ Om ************ O 00000000000O U
N ag
=
WW N
C.00000000000 ====
pg 000000000000
- b 000000000000 N C00000000000 N M UN UN U O M Ow Ow O M .J .J .J C 3 O M
- g M :h WD .C= M + Os D # e9 #
85 B O
= W == C C C C00000000000 O
h
=D M 000000000000 M
000000000000 *......*****
M 000000000000
> L no N N 09
- W eg U U U M > 0 0 0 85 h .A .J .J O M
.ht C e L W g
W 3 L mmmmmmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmmmmmm
- g se se se se se se se se se se se es se sesesesesesesesesesesese su seasseseseseesseseseseas 3 M
=
MS %%%%%%%%%%%%
CW semN@ DMO @MONM CW esmNeeMO4MONM VW %%%%%%%%%%%% MS %%%%%%%%%%%%
CW es m N e d M O d M O N M O
% W WN MNOOMNMOMNNO e as MNOOMNMOMNNO SN MNCONNMOMNNO MQ NNNNNNNNNNNN
@ e m p h h h ee se ssMe ee m%%%%%%%%%%%%
se MG %%%%%%%%%%%N D
e se 0
g e m m m m h ee ss es se m sy d e b b m M b es te ss es e 000000000000 O C00000000000 O C000560000000 N
k.
=
C
- C C O O O
-L =- L == L MN M9 M9 d5 D Mmmmmmmmmed@
>S M N M e m d h ee @ O M N ND MNMemdhes&OMN ND M N M
- m e h ee S o me N
>E mmmmmmmmmeed >S mmmmmmmmm@@@
L3 SZ MWWWWmmmmmmm L3 WZ mmmmmmmmmmmm L3SZ WWWWWWMmWWWW e e e D D D O O O
i O O O 15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8,1986 11 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Pro 5 ram Database Listings l Vertfled bys h h d O M Dates Y Fl.
v i
. Table 3: Weekly Radiolodine I-131 Activity Control Location 33 Observation Calendar Location 81 Location 31 Location 32 Location 82 Location 33 Location 83 j Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma)
! 563 09/10/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 564 09/17/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04
. 565 09/24/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 ;
566 10/01/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 567 10/08/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.06 i
, 568 10/15/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 569 10/22/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 570 10/29/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 571 11/05/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.05 572 11/12/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 573 11/19/85 0 0.04 0 0.05 0 0.04
- 574 11/26/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 34 Location 35 Location 35 Location 36 Lacation 86 Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal 563 09/10/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 564 09/17/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 i 565 09/24/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 I 566 10/01/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 l 567 10/08/85 0 0.04 0 0.05 0 0.04 1 568 10/15/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 569 10/22/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 570 , 10/29/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 571 11/05/85 0 0.05 0 0.04 0 0.04 s 572 11/12/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 l 573 11/19/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04
]
574 11/26/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 I Observation Calendar Location 89 Locat1on 810 Location 311 Location 89 Location 310 Location 811
] Number Date (2 sigma) (2 signal ( 2 si gma )
563 09/10/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04' 564 09/17/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 565 09/24/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 566 10/01/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04
, 567 10/08/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04
! 568 10/15/85 0.00 m 0 0.04 m 0.04 l 569 10/22/85 0.05 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 4 5 70 10/29/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 , 0.04 0.04
- 571 11/05/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 372 11/12/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 573 11/19/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 574 11/26/85 0.00 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04
- i' J .
i
f %
15:38 TUES7AY, APRIL 8, 1986 12 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys b M b* Dates b/D -7(o U i Table 3: Weekly Radiolodine I-131 Activity control Locations 83 Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 32 Location 82 Location 33 Location 83 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 575 12/03/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 576 12/10/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 577 12/17/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 578 12/24/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 579 12/31/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.20 Observation Calendar Location 84 Location 34 Location SS Location SS Location 36 Location 36 Humber Data (2 sl5ma) (2 sigma) (2 sl5 mal 575 12/03/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 576 12/10/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 577 12/17/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 578 12/24/85 0 0.04 0 0.04 0 0.04 579 12/31/85 0 0.04 0 0.07 0 0.07 Observation Calendar Location 39 Location #10 Location #11 Location 89 Location 810 Location 311 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 sl5ma) 575 12/03/85 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 576 12/10/85 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 577 12/17/85 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 578 12/24/85 0 0 0 0.04 0.04 0.04 579 12/31/85 0 0 0 0.06 0.08 0.07 N=53
>g C
O O O
"e
- a I-13 2 mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm e *E
- - 000000000000e00000000 e
p s.o . O.00000000000000000000
. ,e WN I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Ow .
. b e M OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOOO 9 s=e O00000000000000000000 t
$ h . . . . . . . . . . e . . ........
g g
e, a OO000000000000000000O LO OOO000000000000000000 q m )
~~
. c++tttettettetetttt** j
>= M 000000000000000000000 1
( O=
re g C.00000000000000000000 pe==
m H * * *
- 333333333333333333333 es t OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MW l las e 3N gw M
ll3 m IN N C Mw
== M 80 & O M M W M M
== l 000000000000000000000 *"e 333SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS m .J 3 I se g M S
- g a e a A
e h SmeddetheMOmettdOmemm m COMOOOOOMOMOOOOOMCOOO NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN m COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
&4 M W = 000000000000000000000 O= 000000000000000000000
== 09 * * * * * * * * * * * ******** 98 * ********************
O \ e t OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO e OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO g O 3e BN ON se ww Ow e ** M L L C O O m ( 4 4 O I C00000000000000000000 t OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO L se w 0 e, n O W L a mWW
- C e o ce cc es s e M es es pe ce pe ce M w ee ce M M s e s-e s s ee
= O W + C00000000000000000000 99999999@t99++t999999 L S. M == ce 000000000000000000000 e
O es e-s e C.00000000000000000000 t= 000000000000000000000 g, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Me LN gggggggggggggggggggg; E
C O l e
a,
==
- aw Ow O C M pc se O se
- S , g = OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO M C - . o b
. . o o E M O ma C s3U .J S a O l #999999ttttttttttttte L = -e a C00000000000000000000 g NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
= *
- O A == 000000000000000000000 O
- 000000000000000000000 C
d L S
L Ze
- * *
- M=
C.00000000000000000000 w e- C LN w OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO see e
SIN OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
- h C
5 C
8 Nwm (=
e L
- E l M O >L A C00000000000000000000 M OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O = Z g 4
C
( w m O e L
N O a
.M. a 13 3h 9 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN w A d e m b ee d d h ee d e d e m m h e e m m m C00000000000000000000 4 13 = 00000000000000000000O 000000000000000000000 mW ES = CC0000000000000000000 * ** * * =
= a he e l 00000000000000000000O C 0 t OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ON L ==.
9 WN Qw i O - Oh aw
, 9 L M se
== 9 L
> W W O N es t ec h t b e s-e S h e t N es t M e se d M
- e 4 &
NNMMNaeNdNOOSCOcoseMNSS I OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO a
cees .s pe re . s=e O O L O . e . ce
. s-s e .O .M .
s-e re O.M e . M M.O.O e ere O.O.O. O c 5
" ********************* a L O C S O ye ne ce M pe ce we we e-o we M pe M es me ce me e o M s-e ne A ** == b OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
& se & s=e N M e m e S O pe c4 N M e m e D O pe re N M M ==
3
- se es M M me ce e O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O. O.
i O
es W o 8 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O GN M .J Ow 4
>=
L MmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmMMMM L mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 3v9 %%%%%%%%%%%%%
e m ee ss es e e ee ee ee e ee ee ee ee ee ee ee e se e a es ee m es eg eS ee ee ee e ee e e ee ee e e e ee es es M eeM -eperew m eeM eeM M ,% % ,% ,% ,% % % % ,% % %e ,% % % % % % % % % % %
--- Cw e e%eMMs.% %e%es% e.%gy\ 9W M e eeMseM ems e M s e M M M M M pe re ce
- 4 OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO S4'OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO we e %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% seO \%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
e e s ee s e re ce M M es s-e t t e t t e t t t h h h a s spes es ems speMs etetetttethhh O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO j 5 8
== L =L 0
M9 M9 de A M N M t m e h eO S O pe N M W e d h e D e s=e es s=sN M t m e h e S e pe N M 9 m e b e
- O pe
) > MMMMMMMMMt**ttttteflhm > MMMMMMMMM49tettt** tem L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN L NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN g S A
O b
O
r o O 15:38 TUESTAY, APRIL 8, 1986 14 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys h AAc h O. Dates II -fo- 8/o Table 4a quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gamma Spectral Analysis control Locations 33 ,
observation Calendar Location Se-7 Sa-7 Ze(Hbl-95 Zr(Hb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 252 07/01/85 4 0.099 0.007 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.008 0 0.004 0 253 07/01/85 5 0.082 0.008 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.010 0 0.004 0 254 07/01/85 6 0.092 0.006 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.006 0 0.004 0 255 07/01/85 9 0.081 0.006 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.010 0 0.004 0 256 07/01/85 10 0.080 0.005 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.005 0 0.004 0 257 07/01/85 11 0.073 0.007 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.005 0 0.004 0 258 10/01/85 1 0.116 0.006 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.005 0 0.004 0 259 10/01/85 2 0.131 0.008 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.010 0 0.004 0 260 10/01/85 3 0.118 0.007 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.008 0 0.004 0 261 10/01/85 4 0.107 0.006 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.007 0 0.004 0 262 10/01/85 5 0.119 0.009 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.007 0 0.004 0 263 10/01/85 6 0.091 0.007 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.010 0 0.004 0 264 10/01/85 9 0.136 0.008 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.007 0 0.004 0 265 10/01/85 10 0.141 0.009 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.006 0 0.004 0 266 10/01/85 11 0.147 0.009 0 0.004 0 0.001 0 0.010 0 0.004 0 Ob3crvation Calendar Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 co-60 2-131 1-131 Ce-144 Co-144 Humber Date ( 2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 252 07/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 253 07/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 254 07/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 255 07/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 256 07/q1/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 257 07/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u O 0.005 258 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 259 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 260 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u O 0.005 -
261 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 262 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 263 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u O 0.005 264 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u 0 0.005 265 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u O
- 0.005 216 10/01/85 0.001 0 0.002 0 0.002 0 0.004 0 0.002 m u O 0.005 H=36 r# >4 e-e - - - - -- ---
O
. .A i
4EP
, 15838 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 15 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys h- 0hM Dates 4 %
Table 4c euarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross AIPha and Strontium Activities Control Locations 33 i
i Observation CalendarLocation 1 Location 1 Location 1 Lochtlon 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Data Sr-89 Sr-89(2 sissa) Sr-90 Sr-90(2 sigma) Gross A1Pha Gross A1Pha Sr-89 Sr-89(2 sigma)
(2 sigma) 63 01/01/85 m u 0 0.001 0 P.001 m a 64 04/01/85 m u O 0.001 0 0.001 m u 65 07/01/85 e u 0 0.001 0 0.001 m u 66 10/01/85 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a ,
Gbeervation CalendarLocation 2 Location 2 Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber Data Sr-90 Er-90(2 sigma) Gross A1Pha Gross A1Pha SP-89 Sr-89(2 sigan) Sr-90 .Br-90(2 signal (2 sissa) 63 01/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m n 0 0.001 64 04/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m n 0 0.001 t 65 07/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m u 0 0.001 j 66 10/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m n 0 0.001 Obzervation CalendarLocation 3 Location 3 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Location 4 Number Data Gross A1Pha Gross AIPha Sr-89 Sr-89(2 sigmal Sr-90 Sr-90(2 sigma) Gross AIPha Gross AIPha
! (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 63 01/01/85 0 0.001 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 j 64 04/01/85 0 0.001 m n 0 0.001 0 0.001 65 07/01/85 0 0.001 m u O 0.001 0 0.001 66 10/01/85 0 0.001 m _
m 0 0.001 0 0.001 Cbservation CalendarLocation 5 Location 5 Location 5 Location 5 Location 5 Location 5 LocatlOn 6 Location 6 J Number Data Sr-89 Sr-8912 sissa ) S r-90 Sr-90(2 sigma) Gross A1Pha Gross A1Pha S r-89 '$r-89(2 s19 mal q (2 sigma)
I 63 01/01/85 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a i 64 04/03/85 m n 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a i 65 07/01/85 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 m . m i
66 10/01/85 m n 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a I
i i
i I
I I
1 i
- O O y
15s 38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8,1986 16 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorin5 Program Database Listings Verfiled bis
- 0" Dates Y~l0' N Table 4c Quarterly Composite Airborne Particulates Gross A1Pha and Strontium Activltles Control tocations 83 Observation CalendarLocation 6 Location 6 Location 6 Location 6 Location 9 Location 9 Location 9 Location 9 Humber Data Sr-90 Sr-90(2 sissa) Gross Alpha Gross Alpha S r-89 Sr-8912 signal Sr-90 sr-90(2 sigma)
(2 sissal 63 01/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a O 0.001 64 04/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m u 0 0.001 65 07/01/85 0 0.C01 0 0.001 m m 0 0.001 66 10/01/85 0 0.001 0 0.001 m a 0 0.001 Obscrvation CalendarLocation 9 Location 9 Location 10 Location 10 Location 10 Location 10 Location 10 Location 10 Humber Data Gross Alpha Gross Alpha S r-89 Sr-89(2 signal Sr-90 S r-90 ( 2 si gma ) Gross Alpha Grcss A1Pha (2 sissa) (2 sigma) 63 01/01/85 0 0.001 m
- O 0.001 0 0.001 64 04/01/85 0 0.001 a m 0 0.001 0 0.001 65 07/01/85 0 0.001 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 66 10/01/85 0 0.001 m n 0 0.001 0 0.001 Cbscrvation Calendar Location 11 Location 11 Location 11 Location 11 Location 11 Location 11 Humber Date Sr-89 Sr-89(2 signal Sr-90 S F-90 ( 2 si gna l Gross Alpha Gross Alpha (2 si ssa )
63 01/01/85 m
- 0 0.001 0 0.001 64 04/01/85 m u O 0.001 0 0.001 65 07/01/85 m n 0 0.001 0 0.001 66 10/01/85 m u 0 0.001 0 0.001 H:4 e
e i
e- g e e'
~
- - l-il i
3 Rg ************ A ************ 25 **"*"""*****
-a. m -
.N a-
.1 :-
e, :s amannazan=an -
~
. & .OOOOOOOOOOOO 3, - -
.I
.g .
! I a
is ananzanamens &
- t. -
- 53 --
l G
3 n
my as 2222:2a2222e 1n N
l - -
gN
. 8 OOOOOOOOOOOO 2 2 m gg id a e',
I i.
O00000000000 =s assassass===
5.
. ,- e- <*********** -
- - a m3 O ' bN g -
L E- .- 4444444d@@e4 - OOOOOOOOOOOO 9 h 3
1 OOOOOOOOOOOO fu <
f . .
O
~
=
- g
% t a
.I-
-- dd@@ded@d@dd 8
- 3. ............
N 1
4 I
~
- E v.=5 g
T
, 8 h 8 ,"~ m *2
.u 22222 22222a $
DOOOOOOOOOOO gg E E a - o- **
- 4 000000000000 d
o k
o *
- e[
h N. k hhN
,c
- s u li :s an2a22anassa
- n a
p,g ,
au u-2 1 =*
COOOOOOOOOOO
- g. es s.aaan:::: a nuun u 3
OOOOOOOOOOOO g o 4 gu OOOOOOOOOOO0 -
- . .s ,
WA - 4 l [
~
g a OOOOOOOOOOOO as assana8Ramas 9
Ee:
L s2 IN amassamasaas n h 4
-.O
- 3e ,
M- -
O O b $ OGoogCOOOOOg m b e e a tuaanNE%sREm GE ************
- k E au 5 .
=
E *-
. ~I
...OO<.oc<..
CoOOOOOOOOOO as mana a Enzza 3
a g , i 8
4, u-a a ............
g*
g 33332AAA3233 :ge5 33323AAA3A33 i!" 33333AAA3AAA
. .8 RittR*titttt.
Q
uhuum.
C00000000000'O s.2 RRRt****tttt
--- AAAhmmmm 000000000000 0 S.E titt*t*Ahmmma*tTTt ---
00000000000O A.
E 8 8
- ' - sk zh agaRassen
- : a nunuuuuuuun
, i y ununuuununun 2*yu*aRaas::::
y g*lagaRa*3::::
y unununununun sO sO sO
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1983 1 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled by b. C hl'd Dates b tD - 6 Tabla 5: Monthly Ocean Water Gamma spectral Analysis l
Control Locations D Obscevation Calendar Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hb)-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 signa) (2 sigma) 286 04/01/85 D 330 50 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 287 04/03/85 A 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 288 04/03/85 8 310 20 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 289 04/03/85 C 360 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 290 05/01/85 D 350 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 291 05/16/85 A 350 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 292 05/16/85 3 320 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 293 05/16/85 C 350 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 p 6 294 06/04/85 A 320 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 295 06/04/85 B 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 296 06/04/85 C 330 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 297 06/07/85 D 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 Obscrvation Calendar Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tcl-99 Co-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigmal 286 04/01/85 0 6 0 200000 0 20 0 7 0 10 0 20 0 287 04/03/85 0 6 0 10000 m 10 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 288 04/03/85 0 10 0 10000 0 10 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 289 04/03/85 0 6 0 200000 0 10 0 6 0 10 0 30 0 290 05/01/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 291 05/16/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 292 05/16/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 293 05/16/85 0 6 '
0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 294 06/04/85 0 6 O 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 295 06/04/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 296 06/04/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 297 06/07/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 Obacevation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 sigma) . (2 si gma )
286 04/01/85 20 0 40 0 10 0 6 0 40 0 10 m u
. 287 04/03/85 20 0 30 0 10 0 6 0 10 0 10 m a 288 04/03/85 20 0 30 0 10 0 6 0 10 0 10 m u 289 04/03/85 20 0 30 0 10 0 6 0 10 0 10 m u 290 05/01/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m a 291 05/16/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 292 05/16/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 , 0 20 m u 293 05/16/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 294 06/04/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 295 06/04/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 296 06/04/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 297 06/07/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u
. . _ _ _ _ ~
O O o.
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 19 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys h h ? hd- Dates DE Table 5: Monthly Ocean Water Gamma Spectral Analysts Control Locations D Obscrvation Calendar Location t.-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hb)-95 Zr(Hb)-95 Co-137 Cs-137 (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma)
Humber Date (2 sigma) 316 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 298 07/01/85 D 20 0 6 299 07/03/85 A 310 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 3 330 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 er 6 300 07/03/85 20 0 6 301 07/03/85 C 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 302 08/01/85 D 330 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 ~0 6 303 08/02/85 A 6 0 20 0 6 304 08/02/85 3 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 1
305 08/02/85 C 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 in 6 306 09/05/85 A 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 307 09/05/85 8 300 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 308 09/05/85 C 340 30 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 20 0 6 309 09/05/85 D 310 40 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 to 0 6 Cbs:rvation Calendar Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 No(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Co-144 Co-144 Fe-59 Date (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma)
! Humber 298 07/01/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 i 299 07/03/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 300 07/03/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 301 07/03/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 30 2 08/01/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 30 3 08/02/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 304 08/02/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 305 08/02/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 306 09/05/85 0 6 0 2000 0 20 0 6 ' O 10 0 20 0 307 09/05/85 0 6 0 4000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 308 09/05/85 0 6 0 3000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 309 09/05/85 0 6 0 5000 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 0 Ebservation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 As-110m At-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (Z sigma) (2 sigma) . (2 sigmaj
. Number 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 298 07/01/85 20 0 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 299 07/03/85 20 0 30 0 20 300 07/03/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u' 301 07/03/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m n l
08/01/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m a
! 30 2 20 a i 303 08/02/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 m 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 304 08/02/85 20 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m a 305 08/02/85 20 0 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m n 09/05/85 20 306 0 20 a 307 09/05/85 20 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 m 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 10 0 20 m a 308 09/05/85 20 30 0 6 0 10 0 20 m u 309 09/05/85 20 0 20 0
N ~
I-cu
=
o.
M C00000000000 M.
[ OGOcaccagggg 4
en N.
M 444444444444 8 b
O MW M
qp MW WN a M
. Ow g N @m M "
.,3 M ** C00000000000 M aaa33maaa3am .
w ye MW NNNNNNNNNNNN 3 M
g OOOOOOOOOOOO g a
< Q Ow Ma *
> l 6 9 Ge M M N= C00000000000
< a g
COOOOOOOOOOO NW NMNNNNNNNNNN Q f m A= 000000000000 9 L W W ZW NNNNNNNNNNNN O &N
- 3 ye w Nw 4
- (
h C LN ee ,
= Nw N ee & N F3 W in M l
== @ O= C00000000000 0 000000000000 -
M g g MW MMMMMMMMMMMM C M a 8 h 5 a O00000000000 $N sw
- W w Z
G M E b M A d N g g=g Sk g i a g COOOOOOOOOOO MO MMMMMMMMMMMM C00000000000 O
I g b
<w aT a += dedededdede@ a s
L e 4 MW i
O CN M O
L Ew es * @@4444444444 M 000000000000
& = WW f G
- f M MM in DN <
C y } 000000000000 Ow _
L E se O in
& a I COOOOOOOOOOO
= N O Om 444444444444 C Q g o 49
= M= 444444444444 m bN Ow e MS M W G E m = = WN M O 2h 9 N N 000000000000
{-
. . OM .N O '
C C .J M Ow a O '4 I C00000000000 L M W ,M
= . M O O
> 4 L M 4 5g bO C
~
- ** ns 222222222222 O h m
O e NN 36 0 O C & Ifl = C00000000000 Sa sw N Go 4W NNNNNNNNNNNN O C00000000000 L L l 000000000000 4 S EN a O0000000000O N O Nw O= N@NNOOOOOOOO N O > kW COOOONOM I C00000000000 N M w C0000 N N C O @ ON NMMNM N O g CC000000000O Ew ,
= = . N . .
V 3h # D E lal A 4 a I e 81 3 m a C= CC0000000000 4 V $ 0 000000000000 MW WMMMMMMMMMMM
= W C
.m C00000000000 > I
$N C = m w L w W 09 **MMM*MWMMMM O Ew O = u
- E e
w L O 3N
= 8 ne w a O M ll> ht M 4 M O I C00000000000 O C + COOOOOOOOOOO 3
& I 4 MON @@NwMOMM N= edded44@@dde g C W MMMMMMMMMMMM MW
. E C bN .
4 O Ow
- = == c1 3 til e N &= C00000000000 O e (se O Q 4 se O Q 4 se O O ltl in W NNNNNNNNNNNN W W g g C00000000000 g D .,8 O Lw m l#tiflin WillM M M M Mintil H L Mittin MitiminitlM M Mitt L M M itl M M M M lflM W illla L n en eo en en ee en no en en en en en n es en en en en en en en en en en en n en en en en en en en en en en en ne
== VW %%%%%%%%%%%% VS %%%%%%%%%%%% NNNee*** COCO CW VW %%%%%%%%%%%%
NNNet***OOOO CW NNN@@@@@OOOO CW
- 4 OOOOOOOOMMMM W4 COOOOOOOMMMM S4 OOOOOOOOMMMM MG %%%%%%%%%%%% MQ NNNNNNNNNNNN COOOMMMMNNNN MG NNNNNNNNNNNN OOOOMMMMNNNN 4 OOOOMMMMNNNN N 4 MMMMMMMMMMMM O MMMMMMMMMMMM Q MMMMMMMMMMMM O C C C O O O
=L =L == L
@@ We 99 ga C N N M eltid h ee @ o w ma O M N M +lft e b ee @ O N NA O M N M eltl e b et @ O M
>S MMMMMMMMMMNN >3 MMMMMMMMMMNN >3 MMMMMMMMMMNN L3 MMMMMMMMMMMM L3 WZ MMMMMMMMMMMM L3 WZ MMMMMMMMMMMM se WZ W 4 W W D D D 19 O O O ,
Z .
O 'O O ~-
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 21 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings 3 vertfled bys b- 0- ) Dates Y-/D-fb Table 6: Bi-Monthly Ocean Water Gross Beta Activity l
Control Locations El Observation Calendar Location 31 Location 31 Location 82 Location 32 Location 83 Location 83 Location 34 Location 34 Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 64 01/06/85 970 60 990 60 1040 60 810 60 65 03/11/85 720 40 710 40 760 40 780 40 66 05/16/85 720 30 870 60 920 40 700 40 67 07/03/85 760 40 500 30 640 30 650 40 68 09/05/85 1300 70 1400 100 1070 80 1010 50 69 11/04/85 800 100 900 100 700 100 800 100
., N=6 e 1
I j
i O
T
\ C i
e 15:38 TUESEAY, APRIL 8, 1986 21 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys b $h d hk) Dates @-/D - f6 Table 7: Quarterly Composite Ocean Water Tritius Activity Control Location 81 cbs rvation Calendar Location 81 Location 31 Location 32 Location 32 Location 83 Location 33 Location 34 Location 34 Humber Date (2 sigma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 27 03/31/85 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 28 06/30/85 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 29 09/30/85 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 30 12/31/85 0 100 0 , 100 0 100 0 100 H:4 e
e -
9-- - - -
9
~
O O O 15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 23 1
Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings o
Verified by: 1 h >0*
u b d u
Dates N- ID --T b l Table 9a Monthly Drinking Mater Analysts Control Location 33
. Observation Calendar Location Se-7 Be-7 Zr(Nbl-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40
] Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) i 97 01/08/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40
! 98 01/08/85 2 0 60 0 20 0 6 0 40 1
99 01/08/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 100 02/05/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 101 02/05/85 2 0 60 0 20 0 6 0 40 102 02/05/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 103 03/05/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 90 104 03/05/85 2 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 i
105 03/05/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 -
6 0 40 106 04/09/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 20 1 107 04/09/85 2 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 60 l 108 04/09/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 70
! Cbservation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 i Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal I
, 97 01/08/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0
! 98 01/08/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 99 01/08/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 100 02/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0
- 101 02/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 102 02/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 103 03/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 l 104
- 03/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 1 105 03/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 i 106 04/09/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 107 04/09/85 0 2C 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 l 108 04/09/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 1
! Observation Calendar Co-141 Co-60 Co-60 I-131 I-131 Ce-144 Co-144 H-3 H-3
! Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) i 97 01/08/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
, 98 01/08/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
! 99 01/08/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 100 02/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 i 101 02/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 102 02/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100
! 103 03/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 t 104 03/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 105 03/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 , 20 0 100 106 04/09/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 107 04/09/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 l 108 04/09/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 i
Y i
U i
! ________.n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 24 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorins Program Database Listings Vertfled bys h- Oe dids) Dates Y--lO-f(>
v g Table 9a Monthly Drinking Water Analysis l Control Location: 33 Zr(Hb)=95 ZelHb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 cbservation Calendar Location Se-7 Se-7 (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma)
Date (2 sigma)
Humber 0 20 0 6 0 40 109 05/07/85 1 0 50 6 0 70 0 50 0 20 0 110 05/07/85 2 50 0 20 0 6 0 -
30 111 05/07/85 3 0 6 0 40 0 30 0 20 0 112 06/04/85 1 40 0 20 0 6 0 80 113 06/04/85 2 0 6 0 40 0 20 0 20 0 114 06/04/85 3.
50 0 20 0 6 0 70 115 07/02/85 1 0 6 0 30 0 50 0 20 0 116 07/02/85 2 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 117 07/02/85 3 0 0 6 0 30 0 50 0 20 118 08/12/85 1 50 0 20 0 6 0 20 119 08/12/85 2 0 0 0 50 3 0 50 0 20 0 l 120 08/12/85 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 AS-110m As-110m Ce-141 Cbservation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigan)
Date (2 sigma)
Humber 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 109 05/07/85 0 20 .10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 110 05/07/85 0 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 111 05/07/85 0 20 10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 112 06/04/85 0 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 113 06/04/85 0 20 10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 114 06/04/85 0 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 115 07/02/85 0 20 10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 116 07/02/85 0 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 117 07/02/85 0 20 10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 118 08/12/85 0 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 119 08/12/85 0 20 10 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 120 08/12/85 0 Co-60 Co-60 I-131 1-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 H-3 H-3 Cbservation Calendar Ce-141 (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 st9ma)
Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma)
Humber 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 j 209 05/07/85 20 0 20 0 100 20 0 6 0 2 110 05/07/85 0 2 0 20 0 100 4
05/07/85 20 0 6 t 111 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 112 06/04/85 20 0 20 0 100 20 0 6 0 2 113 06/04/85 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 114 06/04/85 20 0 20 0 100 20 0 6 0 2 115 07/02/85 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 116 07/02/85 20 0 20 0 100 20 0 6 0 2 117 07/02/85 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 118 08/12/85 20 20 0 100 20 0 6 0 2 0 i 119 08/12/85 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 120 08/12/85 20 7
7 G
G e
\~ /( 15:38 TUESIAY, APRIL 8, 1986 25 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database ListlP3s l Vertfled by4 h - O. 13 Dates b /D-8b
, Table 9a Monthly Drinkins Water Analysis Control Location: 33 Observation Calendar Location Se-7 S e-7 Zr(Hb)-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma ) (2 si gma )
121 09/06/85 1 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 40 122 09/06/85 2 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 30 123 09/06/85 3 0 20 0 20 0 6 0 30 124 10/05/85 1 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 40 125 10/05/85 2 0 30 0 20 0 6 0 60 126 10/05/85 3 0 20 0 20 0 6 0 30 127 11/06/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 20 128 11/06/85 2 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 ,
129 11/06/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 70 130 12/06/85 1 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 131 12/06/85 2 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 30 132 12/06/85 3 0 50 0 20 0 6 0 40 Observation Calendar Ru-103 Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Humber Date (2 sissa) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sissa) 121 09/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 122 09/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 13 0 123 09/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 124 10/05/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 125 10/08/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 126 10/08/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 127 11/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 128 11/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 129 e 11/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 130 12/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 131 12/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 132 12/06/85 0 20 0 6 0 6 0 10 0 Observation Calendar Ce-141 Co-60 co-60 I-131 I-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 H-3 H-3 Number Date (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 si gma ) (2 si ssa ) (2 sissa) 121 09/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 122 09/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 10'O 123 09/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 124 10/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 125 10/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 126 10/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 127 11/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 128 11/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 129 11/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 130 12/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 ' 20 0 100 131 12/05/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 20 0 100 132 12/06/85 20 0 6 0 2 0 ') 0 100 H=36 .
T 0?
r act s 15838 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 26 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Verified bys hfM b. ) Dates Y-l O -El,
. Table 9bs Monthly Drinkins Water Sollds Gross A1Pha and Gross Beta Activities Control Location 83 Observation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Data Gross AIPha Gross A1Pha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross AIPha Gross A1Pha (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 si gma )
127 01/08/85 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 .
128 02/05/85 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 0 0.1 129 03/05/85 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 130 04/09/85 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 131 05/07/85 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 132 06/04/85 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 133 07/02/85 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 134 08/12/85 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 135 09/06/85 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 136 10/08/85 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 137 11/06/85 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 138 12/06/85 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 Observation Calendar Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber Date Gross Beta Gross Seta Gross AIPha Gross AIPha Gross Beta Gross Beta (2 sigma) (2 sisma) (2 sigma) 127 01/05/85 0.4 0.1 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 128 02/05/85 0.6 0.1 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 129 03/05/85 0.4 0.1 0 0.1 0.5 0.1 130 04/09/85 0.4 0.1 0 0.3 0.2 0.1 131 05/07/85 0.5 0.1 0 0.1 0.4 0.1 134 06/04/85 0.6 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 133 07/02/85 0.4 0.1 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 134 08/12/85 0.7 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 135 09/06/85 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 136 10/08/85 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 137 11/06/85 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 138 12/06/85 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 N=12 ,
Huntington Beach Control Location is
- 1 Municipal Tri-Cities Water District '
Location is #2 ,
San Clemente Golf Course Location is
- 3 T
- S?
15 38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, ICSS 27 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitorin5 Pro 5 ram Database Listings Vertfled bys h. vh> O- -
Dates Y-lO 4 Table 9cs Monthly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross A1Pha and Gross Beta Activities Control Locations 33 Observation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Data Gross AIPha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross AIPha Gross Alpha (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) 131 01/08/85 0 3 7 1 0 3 132 02/05/85 0 2 9 1 0 2 133 03/05/85 0 3 10 1 0 3 134 04/09/85 0 1 5 1 0 1 135 05/07/85 0 1 5 1 0 1 136 06/04/85 0 1 8 1 0 1 137 07/02/85 0 2 6 1 0 1 138 08/12/85 0 1 7 1 0 2 139 09.*C 6/85 0 1 4 1 0 1 140 10/08/85 0 3 6 1 0 5 141 11/06/85 0 2 6 1 0 3 142 12/05/85 0 4 6 1 0 4 Observation Calendar Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber Data Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross Beta (2 sissa) (2 sigma) (2 sisma) 131 01/08/85 15 1 0 2 14 1 132 02/05/85 11 1 0 2 11 1 133 03/05/85 12 1 0 3 15 1 134 04/09/85 10 1 0 1 12 1 135 05/07/85 7 1 0 1 9 1 136 06/04/85 11 1 0 1 11 1 137 07/02/85 12 1 0 1 9 1 138 08/12/85 . 10 1 0 2 12 1 139 09/06/85 8 1 0 1 12 1 140 10/08/85 10 1 0 5 9 1 141 11/06/85 11 1 0 4 13 1 142 12/06/85 10 1 8 5 18 1 H=12 Huntington Beach Control Location is
- 1 Municipal Tri-Cities Water District Location is #2 San Clemente Golf Course Location is
- 3 ,
Y
b & %
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1086 28 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Pro 5 ram Database Listings vertfled bys h fh 0* Date 4 %
Table 9d quarterly Composite Drinkins Water Solids Gross A1Pha and Gross Seta Activities Control Locations 33 Observation Calendar Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 1 Location 2 Location 2 Humber Data Gross Alpha Gross AIPha Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross Alpha Gross A1Pha (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sl5ma) 97 01/01/85 0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0 0.1 98 04/01/85 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 99 07/01/85 0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 100 10/01/85 0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0 0.1 Observation Calender Location 2 Location 2 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Location 3 Humber cate Gross Beta Gross Beta Gross AIPha Gross A1Pha Gross Seta Gross Beta (2 signal (2 sissa) (2 sigma) 97 01/01/85 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.1 98 04/01/85 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 99 07/01/85 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 100 10/01/85 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 H:4 1
e Huntington Beach Control Location is
- 1 Municipal Tri-Cities Water District Location is #2 San Clemente Golf Course Location is .
- 3 h
E!
O O O
O O 15:38 TUES!AY, APRIL 8, 1986 30- 29 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring program Database Listings
! l vertfled bys h_ b Dates h/O - N 1
! . Table 9e Guarterly Composite Drinking Water Filtrate Analysts l Control Locations 53 Observation Calendar Location Be-7 Be-7 Zr(Nbl-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103' mu-103 1 Itamber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) 202 03/31/85 1 m a a a e a m' s a a l a a a a a e a i 203 03/31/85 2 m a a a a
- 204 03/31/85 3 m a a a e a m m
, 205 06/30/85 1 m a a u a a e a a a i 206 06/30/85 2 m a m W W m a m a m
! 207 06/30/85 3 m a a a a u a a a a 1 208 09/30/85 1 m a a a e a e a a m 1 209 09/30/85 2 m a a m a e a e a a
! 210 09/30/85 3 m u a u a a a a a m
- 211 12/31/85 1 m a a a a a u a u a 212 12/31/85 2 m a a a a a a e a m
! a 213 12/31/85 3 m a e a a a m a m j
l Observation Calendar Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 As-110m As-110m Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-60 Co-60 I-131 i Number Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 4 202 03/31/85 m m a e u a a a a a a 203 03/31/85 m a u a a a u a a a m 204 03/31/85 m a a a a a a a a a a j a a a u a a a a 205 06/30/85 m a a 206 06/30/85 m u a m u a a a e a m 1 207 06/30/85 m a m u a a a a a a a i 208 09/30/85 m a a a a e a a a a u i 209 09/30/85 m a e a e u a a a a a i 210 09/30/85 m m a a a a a a a a a i 211 12/31/85 m a m a a a u a a a m 1 212 12/31/85 m a a a a a a a E a m 213 12/31/85 m a a a a e a a a a m Oberrvation Calendar I-131 Co-144 Co-144 Gross Alpha Gross Alpha Gross Beta Gross seta H-3 H-3 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signa) (2 signa) 202 03/31/85 m a m 0 3 12 1 0 100 i 203 03/31/85 m a u 0 4 14 1 -
0 100 204 03/31/85 m a m 0 2 9 1 0 100 1
205 06/30/85 m u u 0 2 11 1 0 100
! 206 06/30/85 m a m 0 2 10 1 0 100 207 06/30/85 m a m 0 2 10 1 0 100 I
208 09/30/85 m m u 0 2 10 1 0 100 209 09/30/85 m a m 0 2 11 1 0 100 l 210 09/30/85 m a m 0 2 6 . 1 0 100 j 211 12/31/85 m
- m 0 2 7 2 0 100 ,
j 212 12/31/85 m a e 4 5 19 2 0 100
' 213 12/31/85 m a m 0 4 10 1 0 100 H812 _
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 30 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings l Vertfled by: b Stew) d MEU Dates Y-/D -N U '
l Table 10: Semi-Annual Shoreline Sediment Gamma Spectral Analysis Control Location 84 Obs:rvation Calendar Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hb)-95 Zr(Hb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 (2 signal (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sl5ma) (2 sigma)
Humber Date 88 04/18/85 1 11.8 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 89 04/18/85 2 12.9 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 90 04/18/85 3 13.4 0.7 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 91 04/18/85 4 16.9 0.8 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 T2 10/19/85 1 10.5 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 93 10/19/85 2 12.0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 94 10/19/85 3 13.4 0.7 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.02 95 10/19/85 4 15.2 0.8 0 0.2 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.1 q 0.02 Cbs rvation Calendar Co-57 Co-57 No(Tcl-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-58 Co-58 Ru-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Humber Date (2 stSma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 st5ea) (2 sl5ma) ( 2 si gma )
88 04/18/85 0 0.05 0 5 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 89 04/18/85 0 0.05 0 5 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 90 04/18/85 0 0.05 0 5 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 91 04/18/85 0 0.05 0 5 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 92 10/19/85 0 0.05 0 10 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 93 10/19/85 0 0.05 0 10 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 94 10/19/85 0 0.05 0 9 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 05 10/19/85 0 0.05 0 5 0 0.1 0 0.05 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 Observation Calendar Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 A3-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 si gma ) (2 sissa) (2 sl5ma) ( 2 si gma )
88 04/18/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.31 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.26 0.05 0 0.5 89 04/18/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.39 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.48 0.05 0 0.5 90 04/18/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.72 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 1.05 0.05 0 0.5 91 04/18/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.51 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 1.41 0.07 0 0.5 92 10/19/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.37 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.32 0.05 0 0.5 93 10/19/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.22 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.27 0.05 0 0.5 94 10/19/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.15 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 0.20 0.05 0 ' 0.5 0.1 95 10/19/85 0.2 0 0.3 0.52 0.05 0 0.05 0 2.00 0.10 0 O.5 H:8 J
i - , u O 9 9
l M
M a a
I-31 6
m e b *****m*@@M e C000000000 M= C. O. O.*.*. C.O.O. O. O.
e M= 0000000000 5 MW ###OOWNMNM p Mg A N M OOOOOOOOOO gN
. Ow -
W @ gNNNNNNNNNM M a M We *********. M COOOOOOOOO I M M M9 COOOOOOOOO I l g OOOOOOOOOO g M q O Ow "
$ w *****mm@dm q
g4 eh g am n>nnN>nnem M
8 0000000000 NO N=
C.000000000
- e * * * *
- m n= e W
3 p
m w gy C.000000000 O L
EN kw 0000000000 C000000000
> C LN *
~
- a I M
. m m
ME .........m O=
N dhhMOOm*#R NMmmmM@<M l
m a a e MW C.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 8
0000000000 M e C000000000 >
S a O000000000 SN -
W Z sw a O O N#nnnOnnne w% M M= C000000000 :
s a e C000000000 MW * * * * * * * * *
- O I 3 g C000000000 O N i 3 -
- =
e@+++mee+M (w l a n C.000000000 * ,
"g L me m E L =
. au Ew em
& ,#,.. ,##M 2 M
C.000000000 C000000000 g . e mg g e >
- E C000000000 m m *
- m ON 4 C g4 g OOOOOOOOOO Ow ,
L 4 E #
O m
& M a e OOOOOOOOOO *****m***M
= n O C= 0000000000 C L W O 43 O V * *****m***M t OOOOOOOOOO E O M= ON e
=
C.000000000 a I .......... O C Mg Ow
~ m & 2 kN ** **
- M
@ M Ow ** C000000000 4 ODOOOOOOOO C 4 MW ********
2 e 8
u
- a C000000000 O
- I C.000000000 U) C O
s s O
.J M I
@N Qw O COOOOOOOOO M
C000000000 a L O M
=
- O O t
> M C L M @ ***@@md@@M C # # a f 0000C0000O N=
W S C g W NW 000000000.O.
C bW o m=
m N.N.N.N.N.N.N.N.N.M. kN N @ 40 0000000000 #
Sa sw E 8 COONNOOOOO e S CN a COO 00000 N NheMOOmedN 3 O Nw O= WhN 00000 N O # kW C0000 t N.M.M.m.@.M.m.e.N.m.
M M w *nNNN N C00000000O C O 4 ON u g a g C000000000 Kw
= - C N .
D > N O W a W a e e o g - O= N.M.N. N.N. M.N. N.N. N.
N O O C000000000 MW C000000000 C = M
% N
=
09 0000000000
.......... w bu Nw
% L C IN 4
= m C M
ww a O
> 4 M N B C I OOOOOOOOOO O =
- W. M.M
- M.N.M.M.*.D.W. @@@@dmd@@M 3 NWWOMOOOO4 b= E C
L @
I W I
MMMMMMMMM mp 0000 00 000.O.
e t C000000000 a C ON C = 0 Ow
- M =
3 M & N *= N.N.N.N.N.N.N.N.N.M.
O s mWO(GW400m m m# C000000000 W W g C000000000 g g i D d O kw N
> L mmmmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmmmm 3uW mangammene g mememmemme e enamemeeme
%%%%%%%%%% DS %%%%%%%%%% DS %%%%%%%%%%
CW dhmmmm@mem C# dNMmmmmmmm em MMNNNOOOOM gg MMNNNOOOOM. SS MMNNNOOOOM CW dhMmmm***m e
MGa %%%%%%%%%% mmmeeMMMMM e MG %%%%%%%%%% MA %%%%%%%%%% %
mmmeeMMMMM e mmmeeMMMMM O OOOOOMMMMM O OOOOOMMMMM O OOOOOMMMMM
, C C C i O O O
- -L -L -L M9 Ms M9 NA *WehnOOMNM nn twehn&OMNM N tmehnOOMNM <
E @@@@@@OOOO > @@@@@@OOOO
>3 L
WZ MMMM >3A @@@@@@OOOO L MMMM L WZ MMMM O
l l
WZ .
D O e 9 d O
a A H O O Z ,, _
e 3
, r*h
=
g=
4 a COOOOOOO OWNCOOMO Z e Z NCOMNMOM S w #= OOOOOOOO #OO00000 OMMMNMMN 1
M L WW * * * * * * * * = 00000000 l N I OOOOOOOO W ***** *
- m ON a 00000000 m Ow -
N M a C000000O Fw J OMNNONeo 4 C0000000 # OOOOOOOO O= WOOONOOM N M aMMMMMMM M OCOOdOOO dW C0000000
= tw 8 I ********
A me O.O.O** O O* O***O OO O= O* O * *O*M C.O*O
- ON C0000000 M 4 .g OOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOO Ow g
. Ew C0000000 00000000
> a O OdmtJOOOO W C0000000 4 e MOOMNtOO 3 ** * * = ***
e @ t NOOOMOOO O C0000000 M W m M tmmmhmmm O *****=** G E m e C0000000 t= C0000000 0 00000000 3 6 g c MW * * * *
- F m
= E O C0000000 a 4
& WN M W Ow 4OO00000
=
O
= a e ONNNMNNf3 Ma J N= 00000000 1 M OONochme M NW ** * *= *** m 9 @ MMOMNOOO @ I C0000000 W
M=
MW C0000000 M
- I C0000000 mw eN 5- dMNC.ONWW
- a * **.
a 0 00000000 e g6 OOOMMOOO a J WN O 4 ON w 4 Ow N dOOOOOOO m=
g N WOOOOOOO O I Sa I C0000000 g
- O e * ** ***
E %
- M I WWmmNWWW m C0000000 M e i e M a
'l L & U=
aY O N h
O W
I C0000000 NW
- E L
w D 00000000 ON e #mmmOhmm C
=
g W 4 Ew O=
MM E
- MW O.O**O****
O.M O O OO3 C e M S E C0000000 m 3N
= Q b @mmmmmmm @ sw L w m= C0000000 8
- O 49 ******** a e
& W 8 00000000 0 00000000 O
= = CN N M SOOOOOOO C W G Nw w f 00000000 M= OMMMNMMM O > O 3 MW ********
E M =
E 5 M C0000000 g Cm IN M C O 4 a Mw n 4 = 8 00000000 a e & C C W 4 N WOOOOOOO tmmmNmmm M O
y%' M4 O N=
OMMMMMMM 00000000 MW
- C0000000 M '
o S J a WW
- ******* M OOOOOOOO O =
= * * * *
- I OOOOOOOO I L
C M s 00000000 SN M ON hw
= 4 O 60000000 Ow
>
- b = OMMMNMNN D a C G & OW ******** W W C C @ C0000000 W 0 m 8 00000000 00000000 h
=
L O Mw IN e m NNNNMNNN C M I C0000000 b N= C0000000 O NW e * ** e * *
- E O a f OOOOOOOO O #C000000 EN h
- Nw hLO 0 W****
m M**** N.S O M a 4 tmmmNmmm O M MNNMMNMM t= C0000000 W OWNOOOOM MW ******** #
C N h OOONONmO 00000C00 N O L C M= MOOONOOO WN 8
N C0000000 W m O NOOOOOOO
= = = = MS 00000000 Ow* t V h E w g ** C N**O *O.O
- O O.O.O.
WD M Manan4GO Ow WN C0000000 t h C0000000 t
C U M N D O O t O0000000 a
8=Z J N ONWOOOct e C M OtmOOOOM O E OmmmONmm L b h M 00000000 O MOCONOOO O = M L L e C0000000 a M
% L L g e W ** * * *
- 00000000
= 8 8 W MW ****
& O C0000000 00000000 0 00000000 M > & W W WC M NNNNMNNN mN 4 L L AMA O O= 00000000 (w O 4 h 580805L ma MW * * * ** = =
3 h EmWMWMme
- I C000000O C e Lee W et e DN 3 L S g r a h g hs a @MNNNNMM mw O C0000000 W = M C& GsWEM a= 00000000 M C0000000 C 4 & SVC Ceu ZW =******* M M 00000000 W N 5 NGC=h=We = CC000000 O 3 M 4 SCm&s&CM LN 1 ********
N m OOOOOOOO O w WWWWAWWA Nw 1 00000000 4 W W 3 M
A N m
L g
Mmmmmmmm L memmmene a mmmmmmmm L Mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm emageweg 4
- 44memme 3 wW \%%%%%%% mememame ,
M VW %%%%%%%%
CW dNNNNunn Le dNNNNumm MS %%%%%%%% VW %%%%%%%%
CW dNNNNume I
= CW dNNNNmme GN 00000000 JM 00000000 "a "a AAAAAAAA 9W C0000000 G O
AAAAAAAA %a AAAAAAAA %g O0000000 AAAAAAAA 00000000 O C0000000 O C0000000 O C000000O C C C C O O O O
=L -L =L *L M9 M9 M9 @@
MD OOHNMtme ND
> M4444444 >g OOMNMtme mededede MD OOMNM*me
>S mededede >
RA OOMNMtme meededed L d4499994 L3 44494494 L3 44499999 L 99999994 W WZ WZ G W W W W D D & D Q O O O e se l l
- e. I-33
, A
. , ........ g........
8 6
~ -. 8888..:.:.:.
- a-a "4I.22222.:22
, - - gggggggg u
d I"S*22*2 I S2838 88 *~ '
8 88828288 37 88:33.288 E
. 8g, 3 . *. *. *. s. ...
... j 8 s. *2 ss*s.s."es.. 8 ja_ sessedse a i
s -
g SSSR8 88888:28 Ig ........ :; Ia.......
........ g 85 *. adddddda i
g I i GN
. E.E.E.382E [
- 2 -
.I 22222:22 n-
,3 g
- h. $.$.$.$.!.".3.I.
8 3 3. . d a d d d d .d ...
,4 g ........ ,
- a?3 . 3-
= 88:gg=8 333 333 g,
,+
g
........ Ag g;
.....ggg -
n l
- a **-*-***
[ . .I a.......
y-j . _
a_ 3; 33333333 ].
8m -
I ....... , . 3_,
8 55 -* s.ss*** 1
~
3 g .
~g,._
... .g _
........ . g g, 3 ........ g; ,,,.....
E - E
- I g, -
7,........
~ - i ........ -
2 i~
I :ssas:s2 .! ::::::: e n -*-o-a--
=7 sessses ;e sesssss= v I
u U
. 3 .e W
g:.s.s.: .:. :.s.4.
g ....... .
- -**a-** m y _g g , ,.
2 3 ........ .gg,,,,,,,
, r- -------- =; esss--se 3
n.n.,gg. . . .s 3
, .... s. --*-- --
66e0 ,
W -NN-N-N.
<[......... --
se......sesses :
1 ) :m 8 c.I s: s "IS:==8 : s a s. s ; e .
- I:.....I ::a:
2 3m g ,,,,,,,, je sesssses ; - sesssses k s -
..... 8
- 1.
a:a . a.... s ........
s_g========
. < v :::::::= -
5ih 2 3 diedeade I s E
,6 I 22n22s a 2* deeddied a
- 1.:
g,-e.. .- 22 s. . .. ,
3 2
u . -
2 128gsg
,, .I ........ 3_..e.s.ss.ses <-
j j 3 f i **s**sse a .g...I..
8.888 SS y
.r .agt.32.y ~_~ ******** 2 . . . . . . . . .L sesidsse i
3 :::::::: 8' :::::: I
- =
I3 z .4AAAAA.33
-g 5 3
a.aaaaa.a:-=.2AAAAA33I3AAAAAA33j34AA l
- .g- -g 3-a aaa--
5 .... .. . .a..a a. .a. a a. a a. .~.a.aa.aa...8 3 .a.a...a 8 8 8 8 s'
033RNNNX u*
s' s' s 03SRENRK *t
<<<<<<<< SSSRNNRK *t t < <<<<<<<< 3
$"<3*RENRK ..
I <<<<<<< ! I i . ..
---.-,-_-n .., , ..,.---------,----,,,,-.-,,__,,_,--,--n -,a ,,,,,,,,._,,.,---,,.,--m,- . - , . - - . , - - -
@ [*b I a M
m gm 4 A COOOOOOO COC*Cen* 3 n Z MMMOMOCO OOOOOOOO O w n=
M N
L WW C.0000000 W
3=
MMMMNOMM 00000000 g OOOOOOOO g6 g ,N a
,, O0000000 M a COOOOOOO Fw J COOOONCO n a NMM&OtMN 4 C0000000 O= OOOOMOOO M MMMMMOMM M C0000000 4W C0000000 m t=
E 4
mW O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.
OOOOOOOO O O
I C.0000000 ON f * * * * ***
00000000 M C0000000 Ow I N Z
. w OOOOOOOO
> #CCCOOOM a O ednOOOMM W 4
m t 4 MNNOOOON 3 C.0000000 M
m a
W M deedhtme O i
C.0000000 O O
C0000000 g g g E
e C0000000 t=
MW C.0000000 O a C0000000 3 F 4
= I OOOOOOOO 4 m w GN l g '
U O
M J
m em N=
Nhhhkhhh Ma M
t emedNted M NW C.0000000 Z 1
@ 20000000 t 0 00000000 W M= 00000000 M mN M= O.N.O*.
@ O.d.O.O.
g MW I C0000000 8
=
- 0 00000000 mw CW MOOOMOMM 3
e WN O 4 ON ya N Ow N C0000000 nw g h# N 00000000 em 3 5 C% =
M
$ e C0000000 e S m a e OddONtOO N M O 4 MO I L l & I 00000000 U= 0 a Z
h i
ay > m >W O l
- - ~ "
- 2
& = 2 u
w dIemeMNtme mM
. W 9
- O=
MW C.0000000 3 O
i C0000000 n C N M 6 3N
~~~e L
E w m=
dmmdhtmo e sw C0000000 0
- O de *****= *
- a 4
& W I C000000O O OCOOOOOO O
= CN > M C0000$00 C W Q Nw w I C0000000 M
0 > 0 3 MW S.M.M.M.N.O.M.4 E M = E E M C0000000 m C M IN M C O 4
- Mw 4 4 = I C0000000 a e e C C W 4 N COCOONOC dmedhtme M M U MMMMMCMM *= 00000000 M '
s O N= C0000000 MW M
$ J a WW *** C0000000 O .=
8 00000000 I I C0000000 WN M L C M ON Ew
= 4 O C0000400 Ow L = S * ,
C V G W OW M* N.N.N N*O*M.M. m W C C 4 00000000 N
0 IN m S 0 00000000 h L O Ww a NNNNMNNN e C0000000 h N
C 4
N E
O O a NW C.0000000 b O COOOOMOO 0 00000000 m h 4 tmNMnMNN CN O Nw O b'O W' NMMMMMNN 4=
d"Odh*Ed W 00000000 C 4 h SCOOMond MW **
- e
- a O OMMdOtOO 8 00000000 N 00000000 L C M= 00000000 WN N 00000000 W m O Me C0000000 Ow a
= =
I **** * *
- V > Z & f 00000000 WA N WN 00000000 4 >
I C u 84200044 Ow &
M M 2 O O L 00000000 a
S=Z J N MOOOMOCm W C M #NtONotm o S DON 4Ntne L % % M COOOOOOM o CMOOOOOO O = M LL & 9 00000000 a M
% L L es b W 00000000
- W W WW & MW M
O C0000000 On@@OdQC I C0000000
> & G WW CS M NCOCMONN mN N L L DA Uw R O= 00000000 Mw Q s h OOULMBu ma MW 3 > MMmW mL
- I 00000000 C
L
@ 0 enmoe e DN E
@ = M 5 hhhg MCA a A=
MMMMMNMM mw O COdOOOOO 9 9 9 AM O L 00000000 M 00000000 4
& N 4 &
m MCCSO4WW ZWw *M M 00000000 m==We>WM C0000000 O t 3 M e E&EIMcC= LN M m C0000000 O O OWWWAMW& Nw I C0000000 4
- M 8 3 M
A n
L N
mmmmmmmm L nnnennan mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm N nnnnnnan N nennenen M mannnann M VS %%%%%%%% MS %%%%%%%% MG %%%%%%%% VS %%%%%%%%
CW W4 MMMMMMNN dNNNNNOC Ce dNNNNNOC CW em MMMMMMNN dNNNNNOC CwSgdNNNNNOO 84 MMMMMMNN MMMMMMNN MQ NNNNNNNN MQ %%%%%%%% MG %%%%% Me %%%%%%%%
O 4 mmmmmmmm 4 C0000000 O mmmmmmmm N 00000000 O mmmmmm%%% mm 4 mmmmmmmm C0000000 O C0000000 C C C C O O O O
=L =L -L =L M9 M9 MG MO 44 M4Ne&OMN NA M4Ne&OMN ma >G meNnSONN ma meNn*OMN
>E NNNNNnnn E NNNNNamn NNNNNnen > NNNNNenn L3 49999994 eZ
>3 L 99999999 L3 44499999 L 99999444 W sZ eZ e 4
W W W A A A Q O O O e ee
3: I-35 e - n
, g ........ r.
u - .-....8I s.a s.:s- K --uu----
l
~
A ** 44444444 -
3*
,, . 9 9 9. .* .9 9 9
~ ~
33 .
I SgSSSE*R <- ',
d I 2222*SSg 8 Sg88888g SE 3.838888 999 8 9*..
R 81 9.. ... g
. .... ****9. ja 44444444 a
.I 1
s - ,
g 838825R. ********
,I; ..e.-.........99 8 I a.
. . g .888888 g )
- I ........ ....
. . bu a
2 -
.I 28222222 -
,3 8 5.........
- $.$.E.!.i.E.E.E.
,3
. . . . . . 3. . I. ,-
.da i.g,"*.9a*99* --. j
= 80888888 *-
f - 8 E~[ I -
d*ddddad i & = = =
- g; '8238222 1
- * ~ * -
ly,*, jI _
E- . .I .
3; 9..-<...
99._.... .]
1 I.e.-<... 8 3,.
.t . 5; 3,, *.a.999*.*9.
... ... A .
g _ ,, ,, ,,
3 ........ a
$ a * ~- -
a ******-* ns7,44444444
, - - f =
,.,, { ;5 .3, ........ -
g ...-<... -
< . g ....-...
- g I~ -- 58:58338 SE 999'**** ". ........
IW 8 ' -
- 44444444 bu ***~*A ya 1 l asas8ssa 5"
- ........,,g,,,,,,,,,,,,
t ,b) a' jg44444444 I
3 223238RR A = * = = =- =; 9 3" .9999999 ... .
6
- =8 A 44444444 -
- -[ 88: 8::=
l 3 = IE I
- -2 -
g T*9*g!!!E8lu" .a. .**** c- ******** E . 1 80888888 44444444
- 8: = . ...<<. 35 ** ~ ~ : -
- i. .1 22
- I
= 38 8:== 3.
1
! tt2 kk 3
- ?
8 388ISS 8 44444444 2i.!.---.-
~
8 888888 44444444 "a
- t I 5-[ <g",
- 2. . .- - .[ 85828888 .
. 3 ~zar. tg ~<~<~~~~ 6. * - -
- 8 I 3
~
tg 53 3 13 *9****99 m
- .ISSSSII S
]
=
.I }ly.A.t [ r= ~-
- **
- 2 3 ........ <
& 44444444 I* '
- = f :::::: '
==
j3gAAAA333j3gAAAA333j3g3AA3332 - j3 -
, ...A.
.se.e e.ee3 , ..a.ee3*A
. .s
.. ..a. ,
.se
.2..
333.ee..
,,.s. ....... g3AAA333 A33333
! 8 8 8 5 c' : . z' y
!. 23:30:32
<<<<<<<< i <23:3 < < < 38 < < r< .8 23:30:32 *t
<<<<<<<< 21:303:2
--,---------,,,,,,,---n.,-,...,-,ame,,~,-,n-m,,w-m,,---
w,,_ , _ , , . . , , , - - . , , - - - - - . . , _ _ . , - . , , . _ , . , . - , . . - ,
s a I-36 m
e M gm e a O0000000 OdOOOmO6 Z e Z MOMMNOMO e w m=
M N
L mW C.0000000 W
3=
MMNMMMNM I OOOOOOOO OW O.O.O.O.O.O.O O*
. ON a e C0000000 e Ow 3N M a COOOOOON Fw OWDOOOO6 m OdONOe@O (
J M 1MOOMMMMO m ONOOOOOO Oe MOMONOOO '
m *= OMOOOOOO 4W C0000000 9 00000000 0 **=***** \
E mW O* O* O.O.O.O.O.O* O *** ON 00000000 M 1
< N OOOOOOOO O C0000000 Ow 1 l
. w E 1
> OOOOOOOM '
a o ONOOOOON W
< 4 ONOMOOOO 3 00000000 Q @ f 0O000000 O M W m M 4**mmmem O +*** *** O m m * @=
g
=
g E
C0000000 NW C.0000000 O
- C0000000 C0000000 3 F
m e 4
& WN g
U M = da NNNNNNMN Ma O J N= C0000000 0 M ddNOOmem M NW **** Z e @ COOMMOOO + I C0000000 OWQOOmem W M= AN MW C.0000000 M g C0000000 sw V=
CW MOMMMOOO
- ==**=*
y g y
Ow O0000000 ,
N fu mw o l ge i N 00000000 Q em 3
' @ @ S C000000O E a M I g M e \ 9 M a L
mf L
O >
h 0
W 9 00000000 w
O=
kW M4N OOOM4 MOO NM a
V E
L ON C0000000 C
4 4WMOMMem C
& =
g W =
Zw O= 3 MW O. O.O.M. O. O.O.O. O m e e t O0000000 m C g M e 3N 7 St b - - -
@ @ d m m m e m *~ @- - - sw L w me C000000O I
- O 4W * *=** *
- a 4
- # I C0000000 0 OOOOOOOO O
= = CN > M MNNMMMNM C W O Nw = t O0000000 M= ********
0 m O 3 MW C0000000 l E M =
E g M e Cm IN N , C O 4 a Mw e
e ** ( = 0 M
00000000 a C
C M M W 4 N O
Om*COOCS @@@mmmem M 1 MOOMMMMO *= C0000000 M '
- *qm O J "
N=
mW C0000000 me
- M 00000000 O , =
O C0000000 I L C M 0 00000000 SN M
=
- ON hw 4 O COOOOOOM Ow
> b =
. 6 =
C W & Op M** M *M M N.M.M* O* m W C C
- C0000000 N 0 00000000
= 0 tN m e e NNNNNNMN L O Mw I C0000000 b N= CC000000 C 4 O NW ***e
- 8 E O a 0 00000000 O 0000000* CN DLh @
I t eo.d m* e.m.t*ee a @ d@@mmmem kw O O W NMNNNNNO *=
- MO@mMOOO MW C.C.0 0 0 0 0 0 4 C e N ONOOOmom 0 COOOOOOO N C0000000 O L C M= OOOOOOMO WN N W m O 00000000
- = = = MW C0000000 ****** *
- Ow I ** **
V > E #
0 C OCOOOOOO W 4 4 mmO4mOOO Ow WN 00000000 * >
0 @
C U M N D O O 9 00000000 a
W Z J N MO@@MCOO W C = M M4NemOOO O E d40Comem L b h M COMOOOOO O COONMOOO O = M LLL & I C0000000 a M
b L L Wee WW *e 00000000
- @ 9 *** MW **
L O 00000000 NOOOOn@N 00000000 M
N
> WL S 4 WWW ES M OMNMNOOO E
PN
& UM4Aa U= O= 00000000 (w O M h LeOOOVLM ma MW ***** **
3 > WWMMM48 e t C
L S
&W S&W a
I MNNNMMMN gw UN .COOOOOOO E
- G h h kr M O
M M m W G S &M O A
C W
e N
5 G CCCSUA Ze sh===Weh w C.0000000***** M M
M 00000000 3 M e C0000000 O t Me&&&EMe LN M m .
O w AAWWWWAM Nw t 00000000 4 m E 3 M g A L mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm L Mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm 4
4 Weenemme e memeneem 4 meememme g ammem444 VW CW %%%%%%%%
444*mmmm CWVW deem %%%%%%%%
@mmm Ce VW ded**mmm %%%%%%%% VG %%%%%%%%
@M C0000000 GM 00000000 GM C000000O Eg C000000O CW dedS@mmm HQ %%%%%%%% MG \%%%%%%% MG %%%%%%%% MO NNNNNNNN 4 maammMMM g WWMemMMM g summeMMM g mummmMMM O COOOOMMM Q OOOOOMMM O COOOOMMM O OOOOOMMM C C C C O O O O
=L =L -L =L M8 M9 M9 M9 mA
>G MNMemdhe@@@@@@@@em>$ MNMemeNW @@@@@@@@
ma MNM@m4Ne > @@@****m a MNMWmeme L3 @@@tteff L3 fffftt@f > @@@@@@SD L WWdt@WWW L ff@dWWWW WZ WZ S S W W W W D D & b Q Q Q Q e se -
i
___ __q__ , _ . _ - _ . - -- - - . - - - - - - - -
- -- -- - -' ~
E. -
m I-37 a i *..***-* Ia *~-
- . - . .s .s .: .: .:.s .2 5-u 4 ** 44444444 ;
4 h3 - .
. 999999.*.9 . .
e 3
I -- --- . * ::: s
- 8**
g=u-....._.
=====sa E
. .. 3* 44444444 a
.g, .9999999.* j .... 999"!. 33 3
, .m.,--...
g g
I ........ .I....
- 3333 33 g~ ...
..- g
= =.=.d."..=.R.
0 5 *
.l ~~~~~~~~ n-
!. iiiiii ggggggg!! g3 2........ Su* 2H%2% 1*!. 99919199
- g ..
a .~ . . Eu
- 3. t "8 g gggggggg
- ~
_ g _
E 6 c.
[ g
........ g; ggggg..g - 1 g-2ag _=
I.......~
a= _
.I g;
3, .
m...-3.: ] ..... . .
- ~
.k E3,s .* .* .* .*..*.* .*g*
........ 3 [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
1 * "-
E E &
- ******** NE 44444444 '
7.
- j. { 5 .
s ........ -
ne
-= I I.......n I. 'E m -- on ee .'e .e ee ee .= R V I
I a - '
44444444 7 ********
l E ********
99*9*9** ,,, j5 *
- -u < e g seas
- aas gu -
5g 'i jS*44444444g j ........,[,,,,,,,,,,
e, -- ........ - =; .9999999 g ,, E $ -
3~ ....
gb ? 8 "!* *.'t't".""! -
.I.......n ~
M.M. M . ***.*..* .
l
- g _ ::::..=a.
7' ***9***9 "-
su ~****** = ::::::
EI*
1
- 44444444 i . ..<..<<< 35 ******** 3 4
i 2-l k: .c 8
=
7 =R====i a
=======.
~
s_i====s==.
- bi 33 ,. a 44444444
- i dddddddd i
i
~>t
$ m &
a mis S 0 011 WL s . -.
....*"a.s
- -[=.=.=.=.s.s.. I.5
, 3 -- ; ;e go ; 3,se..... ..,
6 . ** ""
2 ; t 1, t 2 ~i s "."* *
" " ". m* ~
- *."999*
= "f p.I I r.ag.s.itu~_~~~~a
. ........ 5 3 , i
!' I* '
- EEEEEE ' :::EEEEE I 23:25555 ' 555 5 E j3332222AAj33422222Aj334222AAAj3322222AA
' -8 *ttttttt -8 tititt~t -8 tittttti -2 ttttttt" 3 ::::::": 3 ::"::::: 3 ::::"::: 3 ::::::::
l 5 5 5 5 y
v.' g.-un... z. g.-um... go-==... v.'gI-=RRRR =...
t
.2223232 .t .2322222 .3332223 * . RR
_..___._.__-_-.________..______.__-..m.,.____ _ _ , , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . - _ _ . _ _ , . . _ , , _ _ _ _ . , - - . -
10:15 FRIDAY, APRIL 18, 1986 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys b. fh d. d*e > Dates bl0-9L Table 12a euarterly Hon-Migratory Marine Animals Analysts (Flash TYPE)
Control Locations C Observation Calendar Sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Humber Date (2 sigmal Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Hbl-95 (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 507 11/15/85 black Perch 3 2.2 0.1 0 0.06 0 0.006 0 0.01 0 Observation Calendar Ze(Nbl-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tc)-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Ce-141 Ce-141 Co-55 Co-54 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 507 11/15/85 0.03 0.0111 0.0006 0 0.01 0 9 0 0.06 0 0.01 Observation CalendarRu-103 Ru-203 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sissa) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) 50 7 11/15/85 0 0.009 0 0.06 0 0.06 0 0.06 0 0.02 0 0.009 Observation Calendar A3-110m A3-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Aqueous H-3 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sissa) 507 11/15/85 0 0.006 0 0.02 0 0.2 0 0.6 0 0.02 H:49 e
e O .
e 7
e
/
e - __ - -_.
G
=
,t' l' sll !:1 1I
,
- l l '
9
)
- )
. 3 7M e - )
4 h 00000000 n 00000000 Ha 8 N g 44131442 m 9 ( 8i 00000000 sg 1 e 5s ui Z -
o2
- 00000000 os aaaamaaa e
. 8 )
C( ) ,
u2 1
a a ' g(
a L m 8 00000000 m 00703000 A g 45020432 I g 24121422 5 00670000 0i 00000000 R 4i 00000000 - 00000000 6s P 5s 0 - 00000000 3 A >
00000000 C 00000000 o2 -
r2 0( H Y
, N( )
A 0 00101000 s D 4 a
m 6
00914000 00010000 o u aamaaaam I s g 5- 1g 00707004 o e
_ R 00000000 4i 11020110 C 00000000 u F n t r 1s g a
i M - 00000000 l A
5 t o2 a 1
- i s )
C( n 6g 50363053 3) 0 L a 2i 01000100 e 1 m 00007000 1 2s Hng
_ e 4g 34120432 4 - 00000000 -
s 3i 00000000 1 a2 di a
b 6 1s - 00000000 R( ns aa13aaaam _
ot 00000000 e C
u .
taP 6 o2 _
Ci 2 s( .
a " 2 D 0 1 4 9) 9a a
- 00000000
_ m-a )
3 1 lg 11 m 00787000 R 112 3
_ r4 g 4 e - 00000000 ci ) H p o Ts e o
r y C ( n d mmmmmmmm T o2 6g 00787004 n p s M( 0i 23000320 u e e )
1s o g t n a - 00000000 s
_. i n a D B o n g 00707008 9 9 u2 r R(
o
( 5i 12020110 - )
6s l 6 e t s - 00000000 c 00000000 0 n i i n2 T 1 g 33242324 n s C 2( ( -
00000000 1i o y o e t 3s 00000000 H l s M R 1 a n 5 2 l n o 6 ) I(
a > A I - 00000000 ) a t t n e m n s a 2 m 00000000 g 00787008 1 e
ml'e n '
l a
m c
o 7i s 23121223 00000000 5s 9i 12000110 3 1 00000000
_ o rN An i L
l l
a n
5s o2
- 00000000 e2 F(
- 00000000 -
I
_. i . o g 00727008 C(
_ v0 r i 22000320 9 n e - 0s 5 l
a
. E n .
. 4 00000000 7 - 00000000 n y -9 2 5 e
. i r 8g 45363553
^ K( - 00000000 F n a 0 2i 00000000 2s a -
M C l -
p 00000000
_ m" o
y 0 4
00123007 53243941 a n
h2 T(
c8 t r
o K 12101110
)
e m 00000000 1s 4g 00707004 4i 12020210 oh n
s a
r g n o
7m 00707008 -
3i 34020430 e2 1s 00000000 C(
00000000 2 8
2
_ i i i
- 00000000 d y M t h E h - a 3a3BACCC s2 00000000 4 C( 4 T
_ a d o i el N n c L
o 7
1
- 00000000 )
n 3 00000000 o a r f y 00000000 C em 00000000 o t l r r t 1 00000000 0g 00707000
_ - l 1i 34020432
_ f r r i e e e e e s p C 0 0.G.0 0 0 0 0 a 1s 00000000 t t 00000000 n 00000000 -
l V t e s s ha 3g 05363543 s2 00000000 a r p blb cl 0i 40000000 A(
C e y dsoeodrl 5l 1s u T 9a - 00000000 n
r G
e aslslne.pe ea s hbyuy
-n l lg 50383504 u2 R(
e
_ e s l p eme;k o hi 01000010 0 1
00000000 00000000 h h p edn n- ch Nst 3 t 2 m eniyi:ay 00000000 0 1
00000000
_ u 1 a h a pa p .i e r2 1 s 00006000
_ o S ssshs hk 2( - 00000000 A S
l e u 00000000 b r 55555555 r 55555555 r a
_ a a 88888888 a 55555555 r 55555555 88888888 a 88888488 e 84888888 T de //////// nt de 77774488 ////////ntde77778888 //////// de ////////
nt ea 77778884 00000000 ea 00000000lSee//////// 00000000 nt 77778888
_ lB a ////////
22222222 a lD //////// 22222222 a 22222222 a lO ea //////// 00000000 22222222 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000
_ n o
ir n
o ir n
o ir n
e tr te te te te ab 89012345 vm 77888848 ab vm 89012345 77888848 abvm 89012345 77848488 abvm 89012345 77848488 ru eN 33333333 ru eN 33333333 ru eN 33333333 ru eN 33333333 s s s s b h b b O c O O l!! ! , qjl}j4' ,; i1!iij1i1 1!i3t
m a
y , _ , I-40 2 i ******** I 2Sa 223 e w 4= OOOOOOOO Eg M L WW ********
N = S3333333 I
ON C0000000 e e Ow a .
- N a h 4 OOOOOOOM h OOONO60@
e N@MO*OMO 4
M m
m NMMM@NdM m OOOOOOOO O= C0000000 E *=
mg ******** 00000000 00000000 de ******* *
- s OOOOOOOO M 4 I OOOOOOOO C0000000 ON g g~N Ow Z s( m O OOOOO*Om e O @
4 MOOOO*Cm 3 33333333 t MOOOOOOO M e m M SCONOSOM O ****** **
g & OOOOOOOO *= OMMOMOMO O C0000000 b C MW ********
m
= f C0000000 a 4
& WN
~ g U M = em mmMMedeM Ma o g N= OOOOOOOO I M
OOOOOOOM M Ne ****** ** 2 3 NMNMMO@O e I OOOOOOOO
- M=
C.0000000 M, SN W= 32Wass**
g M. 00000000 aw ga e
, s m LN *******' 8 ow 4 ON N mw h O .
Sa OOOOOOOO E
- M e % a 3 SochCOON MM N M 000 L t. a. M. C0000000 a= NNO a 1
a a e- s =g ........
- = aN MM M.
t aan.s.a.:.a. .
O0000000 m C g
=L m e w e 3N DOONOSON
- Ew m= OMMOMOMO I a O
e W
2 O Nw de 5, O0000000 a
- a w
C0000000 4
g I C0000000 M=
g ,,,,,,,, *** * ****
M 0 3 MW OOOOOOdC
=
Cm E g M M a O 4 a IN R *
- Mw W es &
C0000000 C d e n O0000000 OOONOOON M M O l, 3 0 b= NNNNNNNH 00000000 me
- = OMMOMONO M
- * * *** ** M
% a J a Me ******** e 00000000
= C0000000 0 L C M 0 00000000 GN M
= .
ON hw 4 O OOONOMOO Ow
> L = NNNONOMM & a C S & Om ******** m W C
- C0000000 N 9 00000000
IN W G e emMMmedM h L Mw C0000000 b N
C e 00000000
- E a NW ********
O COOMOMCO f 00000000 h @ NOMMdMem EN h L kw O
3 ******** *
- SCONOSON W MMMMNONN @= OMMOMONO C e m C0000000 MW ******** e O L C OOONo4ON I COOOOOOO N M= N M N O Ps O M O GN N e
=
a O MO 00000000 Uw e 00000000
= I ********
U h E & C WN 00000000 * >
N A C
e N U
44mCemm4 Uw
- M N 2 O O 9 00000000 a
= W Z J N C0000000 W C = M OOOOOOOM O E L
- h M C0000000 COOOOOOO O = M L O COOMCOOO L e C0000000 a Mw NMNOMNdM
& L L S S W ********
= e W W W Q C0000000 MW C0000000
- m > W L S CW W 00000000 1 * * * * ****
M @f*M*NdM mN 00000000
& O A M A O= 00000000 (w Q m h BL 055 0 Wa MW ** * * * ***
3 & 49 Mee M
- I C0000000 C & S&W ees e SN E L
9 = M 5 & hhCUmh
& meg &BJS a
A=
MOMMedde aw O C0000000 A OMOOOOOO M C0000000 4
M N E
GUMCS enN=9hn= w MC ZG ******** M M C0000000 3 M e 00000000 O L 00000000 CM&&re&& LN M e ********
m O
9 e OAO90 ADO Nw L 00000000 4 00000000 M
3 A E L mMmmmmmm L MMmmmmMM L Mmmmmmmm L MMMMMMMM e a mememene a emememem megemmee a memememe
> 45C# MMMMedem
%%%%%%%% CW MS MMMMeddh
%%%%%%%% 8 %%%%%%%% 95 %%%%%%%%
eg & MMMMeddN CW MMMMeddh MMMMMMMM es MMMMMMMM We MMMMMMMM eg MMMMMMMM U
g Nhhhhmmm a mmmm 4 NNNM mm e MMmm 00000000 0 00000000 U 00000000 0 00000000
=L 8 5 5 5
=L =L =L Me M9 M M dheOOMNM N dNWOOHNM N dNWOOMNM N d>mOOMNM ememepee > Weeme@ee > emedeeee > emee6e**
MMMMMMMM L MMMMMMMM L MMMMMMMM L MMMMMMMM
@ m 9 9 b b b A O O O O e se -
I
,l i i iI ! ;t {' .' i ii 5
9
- )
3 ~
6 l
h a -)
00000000 m 30080070 Han
- 8 N g 05103604 9 ( 8i 00000000 sg
- 1 r 5s ui 2 -
02 00000000 os mamamaaa e
8 C( ) ' , u2 1 ) e g(
O L I
R P
A a
m g 14222414 5 4i 00000000 -
Ss 0
o 70000000 10000000 0i 00000000 00000000 6s n 30000640 A g 04223004 00000000 3 w 00000000 C 00000000 o2 -
s2 c( H Y
M( ) 0 00000110 s A
B 4 a
m 6
60000710 u 00000000 o aaaeaaea I s g
5 1g 70580070 o e
- R - 00000000 4i 01001101 C 00000000 u
- F n n 1s g i M - 00000000 ) A 5 t o2 a 1
s )
C( m
. i 6g 36335635 3)
- 0 L a 2i 00000000 a
. 1 m 60000070 1 2s Hm
- e 4g 03222404 4 - 00C00000 g s 3i 00000000 1 a2 di t aaaiaaaa
- ba L 1s - 00000000 R( ns ,
a1 -
s2 00000000 o C 6 u
- t # C( 2 o2 a B(
2
- D bl 9) - 00000000 _
m -
4 3
9e a _
) 1 lg n 70800070 R 3 _
a h' r" e 0 200 0 -
- 00000000 ci 2 50 2 )
H g p s p
o r s e e T
y C
)
(
Ts o2 M(
0 5
a m
6g 70000070 n 0i 02212302 u d mmmmmmmm g t n a 1s o
n a e m 9 00000000 s
- i D B g 70580070 9 u2 _
r R(
( 5i 01001101 - )
o 6s ) 6 a _
t s - 00000000 c 00000000 0 m i i n2 T 1 g 25146025 _
n s C 2( ( - 00000000 1i o y o u 3s 00000500 _
M l s M R 1 a n 5 _
-. l
- h n o 6 )
- 2 I(
. A i - 00000000 l a
t n
t n a m a& s _
a 2 n 00080000
- e l c g 70880070 1 g 12102212 9i 01001201 3 m a o 7i 00000000 5s '#
o$
n m L )
a 5s - 00000000 -
1 00000600 '
O -
i r n l m 00000000 e2 I i0 o2 F(
A o g 00000070 C(
w c i 12132302 9 -
- s * -
e ;. 0s 5 l
a
- S - n . 4 00000000 7 - 00000000 n y '
^ i - 2 5 e 8g 35335635
- r G K( - 00000000 F n a o 2i 00000000 a
p M C ) 2s 0 00000040 a 00000000 m wyr 4 13001373 h2 C
oM -
o K 22102212
)
m 4g 70880070 T(
a 4i 01001202
- i o%t s
n s i a
r g
i n
o 7gm20000010 1s 00000000 00000000 3i 04222504 o2
- 1s C(
00000000 2 8
2
- 00000000 d y M - h t s2 00000000 4 S h a aCCcAACC T
- C( 4 n c 1 a d o o - 00000000 )
i e N L 7 00000000 o a n
r i l
y 3 60000030 C em 00000000 1 00000000 0g 20000070 o t l r t r - 00000000 )
e e e s 1i 04223404
-_. f r r i e e l v t a r e
p t
s hm b ci hb p t s
C 00000000 a
m 00000000 -
3g 16545015 1s 00000000 32 00000000 C e y odrldcod 5) 0i 00000100 1s A(
u T e lspeeearla 9a
- 00000000 n G -m u2 e
- r e y lhpy .
. lg 36546045 R(
- e s l e _kop e . hi 00000200 0 00000000
- h h p n cheen Ns 3 1 90000000 t
u 2
1 a m ir ayeii-p .lehlp
( 00000000 0 1
00000000 00000000 r2 s o
S e S s_bksps# 2(
1 u
- 00000000 A 00000000 l
- b r 55555555 r t a e 55555555 r 55555555 r 55555555 48488888 a 88888888 a 88888888 e 88888888 T
de //////// de //////// de //////// de ////////
nt ea lD a
77770005 11112220
////////
nt ea lD 77770005 11112220
////////
nt ea lS 77770005 11112220
////////
nt ea lD 77770005 11112220
////////
C 55555558 a 55555558 a 55555558 a 55555558 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 C 00000000 n n n n o
ir o
ir o
ir o ir
_ te te te te O b ab vm ru 45678901 99999900 ab eN 33333344 ru s
vm 33333344 eN s
b 45678901 99999900 ru ab vm 33333344 eN s
b 45678901 99999900ru ab vm33333344 eN s
b 45678901 99999900
_ O O O O
-~
i!ii 4j I14!i'lj! ,
T
_ ,*, I-42 e a .a COOOOOOO C0000004 lll p
en Z dNemewNO w es == 00000000 M L MW *** ** ***
W N 3=
, 3, OOOOOOOO g .= S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l M a ow a
- UN
. Fw M
a
[MNetMdNM .
M I 323333"2
- O == C0000000 3'
N ** C0000000 f COOOOOOO eW ********
a, art e ******** O COOOOOOO M 4 OOOOOOOO O N I N =* Z
~
d a O COOOOOMO e l A
- 4 OOOOOONO 3 ======== l M e M N O C0@O0000 O ,
O S C O c c ee d O ******** G '
at m C0000000 *= O C0000000 3 E
=
g Me MO.MMMMOO a
r w
5 00000000 4 til &N l g -
U a em eddedMMN Ma o J N= OOOOOOOO 9 M C O O c e c ee d *=e NO l S
- WNMMMdOO * ******** Z I OOOOOOOO
- M= 00000000 M sN == m33%ss33
" ******** **** *** "" 5" 2,
e un a "aN coo ==*oa &
O 4 ON 1
uw N mw '
8%o *
. .e a OOOOOOOO !
E w M
. 4 4 %- a M a e a M ay L a
& a i C0000000 uw e= e O
OSO.RMR NOOOORO N *-
a :l:
O > c w
- E*** Mas L > ON e O O O O O c ee d E =* O= MNNMMMOO g e a Mg m & C ******** O C a O &
B C0000000 m
= d se SN i L =* M a
O e c o O c ee d
- MOMMMMOO I mw **
i i
O de ******** a e
- G
[ 00000000 G C0000000 O C W G Nw **
l 4 O h O l_ 00000000 M= * * * * * ***
E M **
E a 3 Me OOOMOMOO M
4 C M IN M C O 4 a Mw de 4 = 0 00000000 a '
e
- M C l C to 4 N C6000000 O @ o c o c ee d M
- =e O I .OJ a N MW
== NONMNNNM C0000000 Me
$ == NOMMMNOO ******** M M
C0000000 h i i
O = I C000000O I L C M e C0000000 eN M
- ON hw
== 4 O 000000** O =* i
> b == MtNMetOO & a C e w Og * ******* ist l
W C C
- C0000000 W 1 gN e C0000000 h
=
L 0
O ww M e se d*MMMMMN j 1
C I C0000000 b N* C0000000
- g g ~
NW *** * ** ** '
h O
t OOOOOO*n d o N M O O N es EN
>=*
L **** * * *
- a O 3 O W 3
MONNNNOM em O@OOOC#4
@= NOMMMNOC C M. N 00000000 Mn * ******* es 8
L C 000000804 I C0000000 N O m O M w= MN*+M*CO WN N i
= ** == Me C000000O ow C0000000 U h E
=
a WN 00000000 *
- **** * ** f>
i ini A e C
M U
OU44mnaU Uw
- M N U O O 8 00000000 a G Z =J h C0000000 W C = M 00000000 0 E L 9= h M C0000000 C0000000 0 == M & O C0000004 9* b b L i C0000000 a M= @NMMMdNO 5 S # * *******
= W W ib & Q C0000000 0000000*
MW C0000000
> & W EE 1 ********
M.
4 # M O*de@MNO mN C0000000 L &
8 o
3 h
e=
O ==
LM e
330.AUM eeM 0 Ma o-O ==
M. MOOOO.OOO (w i i
C & &WSWG&
e C0000000 L 8 e SN 5 M AC C h a OMed4OdM m =* O C0000000 6 ** M MOe&tm eCAZW == MOOOOMOO M C A & UCMSSO * ******* M COCmCOOO
& N M CQ060000 m a == OOOOOOOO O 3 m 4 *=.W&CEMS&
2 8 G S e LN>= M M 8 00000000 M AMOOOAAn Nw 00000000 4 00000000 i
M f A M L
g MMMMMMMM L MMMMMMMM L MMMMMMMM L MiflM M M M M M de se es es se ss es se ss e se ns es se ss es se ss e es se ss as se ss es se g
> US %%%%%%%% US C# MMededed CW%%%%%%%% MMeded@@ C# 13Inmededed 8 %%%%%%%% CW Mmed@@de US esessessessessee %%%%%%%%
W4 MQ C0000000 #4 C0000000
%%%%%%%% MA %%%%%%%% MG %%%%%%%% MQ %%%%%%%%
59 00000000 W4 C0000000 g se es es se ss es se es a se es ee ss es se se es g 0 se es es se ss es se ss se se ee ee ee ee ee ee es 00000000 U C0000000 0 00000000 0 00000000 C C C C O O O O
=* L == L =L == L MS Me M0 M9 se sq N M @ M e h ee m a N M e in d h ee m a N M ditt e b ee 6 23
.x NMdM4 Neem 2 33333333 33333333 25 33333333 2 33333333 .t
$ b $ $
Q Q O O e ee ..
5 ~ I-43 A "
s ------- *=
- a. ..Igggggg.gg a.ssa.s:s.a.
.. . m 4
- g .. ; ........
k-w - .
- ~
, _ i--...--. I :: . ... s 3* s..s.s.as::
asasssa . <
.e sz .S.m...w..9 g g, ~
Ae 1 2 888822
- !e g
........ :;.n... n.In.--....j S
99.**.*.*.*.9 I $" ........ -
- n-
<Ia.n..ee.n.n.a.
+
a -- ..
. didsiddd 4l a
_..l..2"R.a.s.s.3. 4 1
.8.......... . ........
4 j - . == ,......
j , g, 3 .
- , .- g .. -
4 2i . ........
j 8a ~
K .
g-l""*E8888 3 m hs 3- ******-* SE ~ E 2 j. -
< I **
SE **gggan.*** ]g
', ,;. .g
- 3,.. ..... .
e 8
3 3,, .9,..--.1
=; -
..... g --.,999.e....... .2 3
g ,, , ,, ,,, , ,, ,
- n - ~-
E =
6 ------- :. sesesse,s
. , 7.
,- I ;5 *3 ........ -
- a g~ l assasssa .g
- :ss:: a
.s m -
s - m - 9 t* sessss:s 3,,...... . . ,e e v-a 8 _e g smaas:ss . -
5
........ i
! I
........ ,,g .......,
I y;4 '
gyasassess:&
u- * =; 99999999 a -
3" . .....
~ > 3 SEtaa:RR
- eb : aaassaa; -
- -[ : ss:::: -
gA?.e a.l E *REBEn 89 m g 8 -
s .3*--dadadede s-i --------
- := ...... se ==------ :
! 21k 8
. ~ ....... 3 * ****-*
e c ,,
.-- c6 -cut
=
888888-:
..... 8.
- s i ~82Ra.s.s
-8 ---a .
4 kt 33 *9**9**9 3 I- II.d.Ii.m. s-[333 3 44444444 -.
- -[ :::::::: g -
6 5 .
== : _ >>
.-I <<<..e<< . . . . . . . .
a
..I
"".8I.8 2 2 -
g Itl ri.I.IIE is .**.9 9999 .6 :
5 Et432ttt k" f ........ .g 88 4d4s4444 8.8 I :::: = ::::::: I :::::: ::::::
ja 22:222222 j 22222222 22222222j322222222
_aeee.e.e.e..e.e.a,ss.eee..e..e..e.j!,
s .._ ..-- - .
... ---- a ..
. _ _ .s.eee.e i
5 5 5 5 z'
z' v' ;
t
=O2"* 20 *t
<<<<<<<< a 2"*520
- 5"*52C 2:5225s0 I
i.
e se
l 10:15 FRIDAY, APRIL 18, 1986 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys hh0N Date: 4- tD - f(,
Table 12bs Guarterly Non-Migratory Marine Animals Analysis (Bone Type) l Control Locations C Observation Calendar Sample TYPE Location K-46 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Hn-54 Zr(Hbl-95 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal 418 11/09/85 sheephead 3 2.0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 419 11/15/85 sheephead A 2.0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.02 420 11/15/85 black perch 0 0.02 0 A 2.2 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 421 11/15/85 black perch 3 2.5 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 Observation Calendar Ze(Hb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 Mo(Tcl-99 No(Tc)-99 Co-141 Ce-141 00-58 Co-58 Humber Data (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) 418 11/09/85 0.05 0.005 0.001 0 0.02 0 50 0 0.1 0 0.03 419 11/15/85 0.06 0.000 0.020 0 0.02 0 10 0 0.1 0 420 11/15/85 0.06 0.000 0.020 0 0 0.03 0.02 10 0 0.1 0 0.02 421 11/15/85 0.05 0.000 0.030 0 0.02 0 40 0 0.1 0 0.03 Observation CalendarRu-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fa-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 si gna l 418 11/09/85 0 0.03 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.03 419 11/15/85 0 0.04 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.2 0 0.06 0 0.01 420 11/15/85 0 0.02 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.04 0 421 11/15/85 0 0.04 0 0 0.02 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0 0.05 0 0.03 Observation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Aqueous H-3 Humber Date 12 signal (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 signal 418 11/09/85 0 0.03 0 0.04 0 0.4 m a a 419 m 11/15/85 0 0.03 0 0.05 0 0.3 m a a m 420 11/15/85 0 0.02 0 0.04 0 0.3 m a a 421 0 0.04 a 11/15/85 0 0.04 0 0.4 m a a m Hz44 o
e e e
~
I
s m
+ -
I-45 1
m 4 . WOOO49MO e E , *
, *M O M N C4 C O O N p O *= 00000000
. g a M Mg M OOOOOOOO t OOOOOOQO s . OOOOSWNO t GN e
- MNNNOOON M Ow Me OOOOOOOO (
a MS u q O.O.O.O.O.O.O.Og a m GN OOOOOOOO E Ow d .
( " _
M
. OOO 00000000 g 4 NMMOOOMO em 00000000 0 ePMMod S 8
e M MG e M C.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.
W 3
G R 9 I OOOOOOOO N OOOOOQOO w
W C 0
- a D ' sO # nmo M
- =
e 4 M=
K C0000000 MNRROOON m J Ma in MS C0000000 M e e COOOOOOO M *** *
- G a
g @hmeMNN4 @ IN 00000000 *
@ O0000000 O Mw e &=
A e
23 C.0000000
- Oo000000
% AU
%. ai e O O O
- b OS O M M
M C0000000 g .O N O M N N Of3 Of 9 3 g M= OOOOOOOO M m
A pD p MS C.0000000 g
O m
e WN COOOOOOO w Ow L * & C0000000 *
- 3 i NMMeMMM@
e L R 00000000
.C* k N N O=
L O
i M de C.0000000 w
M e OOOOOOOO W 9 00000000 ON I
= = N W Ow I C 0 m
- O h
lQC M g
OOOOSNNO C MNNNOOON M C e 4
O We
=
C.0000000 a O
$* M e
j GN G aw
@he#MNNe h Me C0000000 O I
O
=y L
U O
O*
Me i
00000000 C0000000 L 5 H 3N
=- L O N Ew a
> d W L I C
- S C0000000 emmeMNNe W C e M C0000000 O *= 00000000 h O M MW C 4 O COOOOOOO e o M I
SN C e O0000000 Uw W O 3 o ) & = E O M L e MHNNMMNN C 0 U M O O e e M J ~ M
= = N 9 COOOOOOO O h U S W A O #Ne#@*me Q J = 00000000 n D e On
- S M S LC + OOOOOOOO C = m L n lN L % 3 h & Ww a O - C W L A L 3
% L C SH 4 30 OOOOOOMO
= 5 4 S Avec 00 00 NMe*MMO*
M > 8 M S=Cd && M= C0000000 S = & 3Me 3 O O E O
E e
034.
34W U
'3 g' M s
04
+
I MSm4 MOD + MS C.0000000 M.e.t.e.h.6.h.h. I C e e UUWWWWWm W M 00000000 L ,
MMMMMMMM (w
4
. M .
3 M L e
mmmmmmmm L ememenee e mmmmmmmft L mmmmmmmm O
a S US %%%%%%%% DS mameeneu 4 emeeeeem
%%%*S N%% VW %%%%%%%%
M D
CW mmmmmmmm C# mmmmEmmm CW WMmmmmmm Gq OOOONNNN W4 OOOONNNN SW OOOONNNN 4 MG %%%%%%%% MG %%%%NNNN MQ %%%%%%%%
N N 44446666 m 44440+#6 - en 4444%%6@
Q C0000000 0 00000000- 0 00000000 r
C C C O O O
=L -L =L MS MS MS RA N MA DE M@meheDO > MemeNGSe > M*m4heDO L3 WeW## ewe L enemme#6 L e 4 4 4 59 4 4 @
SZ SZ S b b bO O O 5
15:38 TUEEDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 46 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring program Database Listings Vertfled bys b Th O- Dates Y"10~76 Table 13bs Semi-Annual Local Crops Tritium and strontium Activities Control Locations 82 Observation Calendar sample Type Location Sr-89 sr-89 sr-90 sr-90 Bound H-3 Sound H-3 Aqueous H-3 Av== H-3 12 signa) (2 signal (2 sigma) !! sl y )
Humber Date 149 06/05/85 cucumber 1 m u 0 0.0020 0 0.20 0 0.004 150 06/05/85 caullflosser 1 m u 0 0.0030 0 0.30 0 0.003 151 06/05/85 string beans 2 m u O 0.0030 0 0.40 0 0.007 152 06/05/85 squash 2 m u O 0.0030 0 0.40 0 0.006 153 09/25/85 cucumber 1 m n 0 0.0010 0 0.10 0 0.002 154 09/25/85 tomato 1
- m 0 0.0009 0 0.10 0 0.002 155 09/25/85 tomato 2 m u 0 0.0007 0 0.08 0 0.002 156 09/25/85 kale 2 m n 0 0.0030 0 0.40 0 ,
0.008 N:8 i
O e
J.
1 .
4 T
O e e
- O O 0:
15:38 TUESDAY, APRIL 8, 1986 47 Southern California Edison Company Environmental Monitoring Program Database Listings Vertfled bys
'(Ar.$84-'>O- Dates Y-lD~fb Table 14: Annual soll Analysis Control Locations 34 Observation Calendar Location Be-7 Be-7 Zr(Nbl-95 Zr(Nb)-95 Cs-134 Cs-134 K-40 K-40 Ru-103 Number Date ( 2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 algme) 50 12/18/85 1 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 15.0 1.0 0 51 12/18/85 2 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 6.3 0.3 0 52 12/18/85 3 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 20.0 1.0 0 53 12/18/85 4 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 19.0 1.0 0 54 12/18/85 5 0 0.3 0 0.1 0 0.05 12.3 0.6 0 Cbservation Calendar Ru-103 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-58 Co-58 Ag-110m AP110m Co-141 Co-141 Humber Date (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) ,
(2 sigma)
, 50 12/18/85 0.1 0.00 0.04 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 51 12/18/85 0.1 0.08 0.02 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 52 12/18/85 0.1 0.04 0.02 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 53 12/18/85 0.1 0.00 0.04 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 54 12/18/85 0.1 0.00 0.04 0 0.05 0 0.05 0 0.1 Observation Calendar Co-60 co-60 I-131 I-131 Ce-144 Ce-144 S r-89 s r-89 Sr-90 s r-90 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 50 12/18/85 0 0.03 0 0.5 0 0.2 m u 0.00 0.01 51 12/18/85 0 0.02 0 0.5 0 0.2 m M 0.03 0.01 52 12/18/85 0 0.03 0 0.5 0 0.2 m u 0.00 0.01 53 12/18/85 0 0.04 0 0.5 0 0.2 m u 0.00 0.01 54 12/18/85 0 0.04 0 0.5 0 0.2 m u 0.02 0.01 N=5 -
e T*
f:
e 4 m I-48 Y
a M, _ -
4 D 00000000 *MMMM*Me Z t e*
p Z
w W=
C0000000 C0000000 eddMeded 00000000
( . M L WW * * * * * * * * = C0000000 N t COOOOOOO W ***** * * *
! . ON a "
W OOOOOOOO 4 Ow 3N l a WNOMOOOW Fw a COMOMWMO 4 w @@@M@@M@ m O= 00000000 m OOOOOOOW W 4W C000000O E @= 00000000 t OOOOOOOO I ON 00000000 M
< mW ******** O OOOOOOOO O Ow 1
. N Z
> w WhodOCON
( a O MMOMOOOf W u @ 00000000 3 00000000 e @ 0 00000000 O w W m M NNNNNNNN O * * * * * * *
- W 3 m i C0000000 += 00000000 O C0000000 3
> C C MW * * * * * * *
- F
= E O C0000000 a 4 4 W WN M W Ow mem>m>>e
= = a @ C0000000 Ma m J N= 00000000 I M @@@Me@MM M NW * * * * * * *
- Z W W OOOOOOOO @ I C0000000 MMMMe@NN W M= 00000000 M NN W= *******
- g MW * ***** O C0000000 gw CW C0000000 D 9 00000000 W 3 ea WN O e ON y ow N ew N
Q M f ea e N 8 00000000 a @
3 = M I E M e j M a I L 3 I C0000000 U= NNNNNNNN a Z L
O ON de h NNNNNNNN C D C0000000
& = Ew O= 00000000 3 g a MW * * * * * * *
- O MM l 00000000 e C 4
- UN
= Q NNNNNNNN @ gw L m= C0000000 8 O 4W ******** " 4 M t O0000000 0 0000000O O mmm*mm*m
- CN > M 00000000 C Q Nw w I C0000000 M= C0000000 O O 3 MW =* ******
E = E g M OOOOOOOO C m IN M O 4 a Mw n = t O0000000
- M M C C 4 N **@M@@Me NNNNNNNN M @MeetOOm o e U C0000000 >= C000003O M WMMMMOOO S O b= C0000000 MW e * * * * * *
- M C0000000 C = J a WW * * * * * **
- I COOOOOOO I ***** * **
O I OOOOOOOO WN M COOOOOOO L M ON hw
=
- O C0000440 Ow I
>d b = mmMMNCON *
- C M CW ******** m g W G' C
- COOOOOOO N 9 00000000 m emeNmMNm O 3N m W em CC000000 h O ww 1 C0000000 b N= 0000000O C 0 NW *******
- m O a e COCOOOOO
& W O COCOOONO CN S =
- OMeNeeMW kw O > d 9 ******** *
- NNNNNNNN O > W emmNMOMM G *= C0000000 M u mmodOOON MW * * * * * * *
- e C m hm co*O**MO I C0000000 N O C C M= C0000000 WN N W 4 O MW Ow I C0000000
= = = I C* 0 0* 0* 0* *0 0.O* C D > & M WN C0000000 * >
WD M 4 (eQOdeQ4 Ow e W U M a
e U W O I C0000000
- W J b MNO4 COO 4 W C = M M MMCMCQo* O S MM*NMMNM L % 4 M C0000000 O CC000000 O = 3 ******** I C0000000 a M= C0000000
% L C &&&&&&&& W * * ** * * *
- G MW ** **** **
- W C W O C0000000 u mewheNNW I COOOOOOO M > 4 & $9999999 Mm C0C00000 mN 4 I h ======== O= C0000000 (w O = > MMMMMMMM mm MW * * *
- e
- e
- C S
W W WWWWWWWW eG
>>>>>>>> Iu #CC00044 DN B C0000000 E
L e M WMWWWWWW am OMMOMMOO Nw O W 4 00000000 D= C0000000 M E = m LLLLLLLL ZW * * * * * * *
- M M 00000000 W W N UUULUUUU w 00000000 O 9 3 M e magggems LN M m O E5353333 Nw I C0000000 4 e W 3 M N D L mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm L mmmmmmmm a e enumemee g emememme e mememeem e seem444m
> VW %%%%%%%N VW %%%%%%%N UW %%%%%%%% VW %%%%%%%%
CM OOOMetet CM OOOMette CM OOOM4*t* CM COOM****
WM NNNNOOOO WN NNNNOOOO W4 NNNNOOOO WN NNNNCOOO MQ %%%%%%%% MA %%%%%%%% MQ %%%%%%%% MA %%%%%%%N N mmmmed@M N mmmmedeM N mmmm@@@M S Mmmm@ded O COOOOOOM O COQQOCOM O COOOOOCH O COOOOOOM C C C C O O O O
=L *L -L -b MW MW MW WW ND MD ND ND DE eOMNMeme L3 #@@eeeee L3 momeeeee
>E OCMNM@me
>3 L
E eOMNM@me weeeeeee >3 SONNMeme L
E memeeeem WZ WZ WZ WZ
- W W W D D D D C O O Q
O O O'.
15:38 TUESDAY APRIL 8,1986 49 southern Californla Edison Company Environmental Monitoring program Database Listings Vertfled bys h -@M b* b Date Y"10 - 7f f, Table 15 semi-Annual Kelp Analysis Control Locations D C bservation Calendar sample Type Location K-40 K-40 Zn-65 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-134 Mn-54 Mn-54 Zr(Nb)-95 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigan) 97 11/04/85 macrosystis P. B 6.2 0.3 0 0.02 0 0.004 0 0.004 0 98 11/04/85 nacrosystis P. D 6.6 0.4 0 0.02 0 0.005 0 0.005 0 Ob:ervation Calendar Zr(Hb)-95 Cs-137 Cs-137 Co-57 Co-57 No(Tc)-99 Mo(Tc)-99 Co-141 Co-141 C0-58 C0-58 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 signal (2 sigma) (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 97 11/04/85 0.01 0.0038 0.0002 0 0.004 0 2 0 0.02 0 0.003 98 11/04/85 0.01 0.0056 0.0002 0 0.005 0 2 0 0.02 0, 0.004 Observation CalendarRu-103 Ru-103 Ce-144 Ce-144 Fe-59 Fe-59 Ru-106 Ru-106 Ra-226 Ra-226 Co-60 Co-60 Humber Date (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) 97 11/04/85 0 0.009 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 0.009 0 0.004 98 11/04/85 0 0.009 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 0.02 0 0.009 0 0.006 Ob3ervation Calendar As-110m As-110m Th-228 Th-228 I-131 I-131 Bound H-3 Bound H-3 Aequeous H-3 Aelueous H-3 Humber Data (2 si gma ) (2 sigma) ( 2 si gma ) (2 sigma) (2 sigma) 97 11/04/85 0 0.003 0 0.009 0.013 0.006 0 0.2 0 0.006 98 '11/04/85 0 0.005 0 0.009 0.058 0.006 0 0.2 0 0.007 Hs10 O
e i
P4 N
.m__-_-__. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '-a v - - e
! l 1,
d O
l I
l l
APPENDIX J \
FIGURES I
I Ir 1
1
+
l i
I O
l i
- -- ___ __ _ ,--m . _ _ _ _ , . , - - - . . - - , . . , - , , _ - , , . . . - - - . - , . - l
J-Oa O LIST OF FIGURES (APPENDIX J)
Fiqure Page la TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring 1 lb TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring 1 2a Montly Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Air 2 2b Montly Average Gross Beta Concentrations in Air 2 3a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Sheephead, SONGS Unit 1 3 versus Control 3b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Sheephead, SONGS Unit 1 3 versus Control 4a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Black Perch, SONGS Unit 1 4 versus Control 4b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Black Perch, SONGS Unit 1 4 O versus Control Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Crustacea, SONGS Unit 1 5 5a versus Control Sb Cesium-137 in Flesh of Crustacea, SONGS Unit 1 5 versus Control 6 Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Mollusks, SONGS Unit 1 6 versus Control 7a Cobalt-60 in clesh of Mollusks, SONGS Unit 1 7 versus Control 7b Cesium 137 in flesh of Mollusks, SONGS Unit 1 7 versus Control 8a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Sheephead, SONGS Units 2 8 and 3 versus Control 8b Cesium-137 in flesh of Sheephead, SONGS Units 2 8 and 3 versus Control 9a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Perch and Bass, SONGS Units 2 9 and 3 versus Control
- 9b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Perch and Bass, SONGS Units 2 -9
[ss~\ and 3 versus Control
J-Ob O LIST OF FIGURES (Cont.)
(APPENDIX J)
Fiqure Page 10a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Crustacea, SONGS Units 2 10 and 3 versus Control 10b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Crustacea, SONGS Units 2 10 and 3 versus Control lla Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Mollusks, SONGS Units 2 11 and 3 versus Control lib Cesium-137 in Flesh of Mollusks, SONGS Units 2 11 and 3 versus Control 12a Cobalt-60 in Shell of Crustacea, SONGS Unit 1 12 versus Control 12b Cesium-137 in Shell of Crustacea, SONGS Unit 1 12 versus Control
( I 13a Cobalt-60 in Bone of Mollusks, SONGS Units 2 13 and 3 versus Control 13b Cobalt-60 in Shell of Crustacea, SONGS Units 2 13 and 3 versus Control 14 TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring, Preoperational 14 and Operational Data 15 TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring, Preoperational 15 and Operational Data 16 TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring, Preoperational 16 and Operational Data 17a Air Particulates Gross Beta Activity, San Clemente 17 Preoperational and Operational Data 17b Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Preoperational 17 and Operational Data, SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 18a Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Preoperational 18 and Operational Data, SONGS Units 2 and 3 18b Airborne Particulates Gross Beta Activity Preoperational 18 and Operational Data, SONGS Units 2 and 3 O- 19a Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Beta Activity, San 19 Clemente Preoperational and Operational Data
J-Oc O LIST OF FIGURES (Cont.)
(APPENDIX J)
Fiqure Page 19b Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Beta Activity, Tri-Cities 19 Preoperational and Operational Data 20 Quarterly Drinking Water Filtrate Gross Beta Activity, 20 Preoperational and Operational Data, SONGS Units 2 and 3 21a Historical Trending of Strontium-90 in Soil, SONGS 21 Units 1, 2 and 3 versus Control 21b Historical Trending of Cesium-137 in Soil, SONGS 21 Units 1, 2 and 3 versus Control 22a Cobalt-58 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 22 versus Control 22b Cobalt-60 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 22 versus Control-23a Silver-110m in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 23 O- versus Control 23b Cesium-137 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 23 versus Control 24a Radium-226 in Ocean Bot' tom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 24 versus Control 24b Thorium-228 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 1 24 versus Control 25a Cobalt-60 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 2 25 versus Control 25b Cesium-137 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 2 25 versus Control 26a Cobalt-60 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 3 26 versus Control' s
26b Cesium-137 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 3 26 4 versus Control 27a Cobalt-58 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 2 27 versus Control
( 27b Cobalt-58 in Ocean Bottom Sediments, SONGS Unit 3 27 versus Control l
J-Od LIST OF FIGURES (Cont.)
(APPENDIX J)
Fiqure Page 28a Cobalt-60 in flesh of Sheephead Unit 1 versus Control 28 28b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Sheephead, Unit 1 versus Control 28 29a Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Crustacea Unit i versus Control 29 29b Cobalt-60 in flesh of Crustacea Unit i versus Control 29 30 Cesium-137 in flesh of Crustacea Unit i versus Control 30 31a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Mollusk Unit 1 versus Control 31 31b Cesium-137 in flesh of Mollusk Unit i versus Control 31 32a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Sheephead Units 2 and 3 versus 32 Control O 32b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Sheephead Units 2 and 3 versus Control 32 33a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Crustacea dnits 2 and 3 versus 33 Control 33b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Crustacea Units 2 and 3 versus 33 Control 34a Cobalt-60 in Flesh of Mollusks Units 2 and 3 versus 34 Control 34b Cesium-137 in Flesh of Mollusks Units 2 and 3 versus 34 Control 35a Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Crustacea Units 2 and 3 versus 35 Control 35b Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Mollusks Units 2 and 3 versus 35 Control 36a Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Sheephead Unit i versus Control 36 36b Cobalt-58 in Flesh of Mollusks Unit i versus Control 36 i
O
I i
l J-1 TLD DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING 24 23- i
\
/*../*..r-~~
~
./**.
22-i 5
./ /~~~
\
21-
.~
! ,/ 'N'%~
w _
Q / .
/
/
l '
20-
/
l ..
/ *,..*
/
/
- .. Figure la 19 -
Legend eme r. s.
, symyyro yr,. .
j vist cas erstri na s or staca s 18 JAN APR JUL OCT 1985 O
TLD DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING 20
'N N
N 25- N N
N N
\
24- s N
N- _-
E 2
E 23-
'~~'~~s' W
M l O 22-O l 21-p'#_ Figure Ib
,./* Legend
' ... CONTRO Nw 20- - ..,
EO_9E .IA_I.Ec STATE BEACH W O 10 JAN APR JUL OCT l
1985
J-2 MONTHLY AVERAGE GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR 0.035 -
f,
/ \ l
/ \
/ \ ,
/ i l
0.030- s /
\
\
/ \
\ / \
j
\ \
B \ / .d
\ j 3 \ / ..
E 0.02s- N //
o *
\ // i 3 \ '
- s \ ,/. /
u ., ll
$ \ /-
5 0.020-g
\
x- N xv ,,-/
/[
/ l g '
Figure 2a 0.0's - I t Legend CONTROL EbEff.. l MESA E O F 0.010 J F M A M. J J A S O N D 1985 O MONTHLY AVERAGE GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR 0.035 0.030-
\
\
\
E \
l 5 \, \
,g ,
E 0.02s- '
o g
. . .\
O '\ /
T .'\
$ 0 020-- .'.\ s ,
j
.O,
\ /
y N f',s\ p-- "
f
\ Figure 2b l 0.015 - - f l Legend
., f j cowTwot.
SAMLEyEh!E,,
O l
j e,verEsetEros J F M A M J J A S O N D 1985
- -3 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL h.
0.030 0025- ---
0.020-2 3 1 i d 0 015-Y
'4
. 0.010 - ~.
0.005- h Figuee 3a
! - E b$ht'"
MAR JUN SEP DEC 1985 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 9.0 8.0 -
1 7.0 - ,,
. fl I eo- i & ; )
e cc- - . ,)
Q
/: V/gf,1 na 30- y fa
' ~
y.- a -
4 , ,,,..>,
- ':1
// 4 ,,3 Legend 50 08 7
/ : m . . . . a l MAR JUN SEP DEC 1985
J-4 C08 ALT-60 IN FLESH OF BLACK PERCH SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL O.025-0.020-0.015 -
0 0,010 -
l F f gure 4a l 3.005-l EE fbki'F" MAR JUN SEP DEC 1985 .
CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF BLACK PERCH SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL O.018 0.016-0.014 -
0.012 -
z ,
p 0 010-0.008-C006-a : ;
O004- ,
4 Figure 4b 0.002-I bib -
C3 N WPOR EACH 0.000 - - ~ ~ ^-
~
COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEAE l
SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 1 n
0.030 0.025-
/
i 0.020-I ' b i
O 015 -
- /
'E 8
0 0.010 -
4 Figure Sa 0.005- )
. 1 'Yb - /, 3$5biY$*"
JAN APR JUL OCT 1985 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEAE SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL Q.018 0 014 -
0.0 12 -
5 0.010 - >
f , .,
! 0.008-4
.9 -
0.006-E .v Y -
4 0.004- $ j'y ; t' /
g7 j . g j<
Figure $b j '
0.002-
- )-/ / jf':' ':
j A li!E - !: :l -
4 Legend
$N5iEN9/f'2d l .: ... :
..fi
!! ig e. :3 ,,, $ sIx'Os xY[ "
n ggg JAN APR JUL OCT 1985
O _
O O.
COBALT-58 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL O.40 O.36-0.30-5 0.25-E g 0.20 -
g 0.15 -
0.10-Figure 6 0.05-0.00 I '
i l
J-7 :
COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS '
,m SONGS UNIT l vs. CO.NTROL 2.5 2-b h L5-e e
e
'~
} ; ci ;
'5 i
'~ kj ngor. n Legend o
) i Es"N!!Ks'F" MAR JUN SEP DEC 1985 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL -
30 26-
, 20-5 E
, 15 -
E 8
. 10 -
8 8
6-0- -.
0 -5 - ' - - -
7$
N 4
Legend ,
C3 NEWPORT BEACH j, MAR JUN SEP DEC i 1985
J-8 i COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD I SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL I y 7.o l 60-P1 g 1 7 '
i s ,
3
, 4.o -
p/
e > 1 E *
. 3.0 -
a
.0 1
" 2.o - 1 4
Hgure sa 3 g.
O.0 E85 l$!ff) $lkfd E!
! =EEE" 1985 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL 0.010 0.008- '
p; x-I
'g '; i l t
z a
f..4
- > a 3 0006- s, py '4 py/ '<:m
$ < A?'h',h 5 .4
,i:) E,'j#j
.I ? EX4,'j 8 F E
p%y'l,?
0 002- ; p;;-))3
,/
3 g;; l p;/ g) Hsure en it f i, O Vwdj^<BR A ! R M,/,/ ,'] =l5 %
J-9 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF PERCH AND BASS SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL 0.046 0.040-0.035-0.030- /
p 0 025-E 0.020-0.016 - j 0 010 -
4 Figure 9a Legend
, , , , ._ a : ,
E EUU"fA*1*3 JAN APR JUL OCT 1985 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF PERCH AND BASS SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL 0.0 14 0 012-0.010 -
i O.008-S
. 0.005-
<l
$ 0.004-fj i : Figure 9b 0.000
--- !------ ~
JAN APR JUL OCT 1985
J-10 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEAE SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs CONTROL
- k. o.o36 o.o30-o.o2s -
o.020-s '/A '
.! o.ots-Y /
o.olo-n_gg ,_ 9;/
,p 4;
y Figure Ica Legend ;
, M ,5 ' sos'0=YE[s*Ik '
JAN APR JUL OCT 1986 CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEAE '
SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 VS. CONTROL l o.010 o.0 14 -
o.012 - )
if 0.010 - d
$ l
} o ooS- ,
o.coS - g,
.9 0.004- ?[ -
[
l o.ooo 2 --- - - - - - - -
' -N '
l l t
I l
J-ll COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL 0.16- ,
3 E
5 ,
E.
O.10 -
.2 h << >
a 0.06- i j Figure lla ,
i
} C3 NZWP TBEACH
," y /, j _,. . . = scscs txits t's JAN APR JUL OCT 1985 O CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL ,.
7.0 80-
/
5.0 -
a 4 5
3
,4o-w
.g s o - _
8 2.0 -
/
90Ik O ., liffil E l#Ni M JAN APR JUL M!!sil OCT
!= sis?!s=
1985 !
i F i*
J-12 I COBALT-60 IN SHELL OF CRUSTACEAE :
SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 0.07
- 1 0.08-O.06-V 3 '
, 0.04- , I h '!
? . :
.g o.cs- ; j d I o.o2 - j g
g 7] Figure tra
/ c38N58' '
g g, _
MAR JUN SEP DEC l 1985 O CESIUM-137 IN SHELL OF CRUSTACEAE
{
SONGS UNIT l VS. CONTROL 7.0 6.0 - }
6.0 - ..
! 4.0 -
4
- I
.h 3.0 - < 4
.9 f 2.0 - :
l Figure 12b O.0 f - ' '. . . . .;
'-- -~
7 4 sNsc*
l
J-13 COBALT-60 IN SHELL OF CRUSTACEAE i SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs.. CONTROL i O.12 l
0.10-i l
_ 4 i
h 0.08 -
t, ..
0.00- y ,,
8 0.04-a : .
I O.02- .
Figure 13a so c
/ _____
O ~1985 COBALT-60 IN BONE OF MOLLUSKS SONGS UNITS 2 AND 3 vs. CONTROL ,
0.14 0 12 -
I 1
, 0.10 -
1 E
O.08-s . 0.0 0 -
8 1
0.04-l 0 02- Figure 13b '
o ,
0.00 J'
_m.
(U"***"'*"*
l I 1985 i L _
l
O . ..
O O TLD DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA 45 40-35- i E i e :.
E \.: \ ti
- i; / '
uJ ': !
, U)
O
'll&'.\'.t O s \ ~. !\
2e- 'y Q .
f:A.
- \\ ~.
- y. .
,~. ;lIj '\ l ..
i
,o. '/.;. : ,
v
'v..
,f.;:j f, j. \._ ......... ..._l
....... Legena cownton.
_ _ _/ '
/ ; \._j .
m ci.euente OI.D It_0_U,TE 101 16- .. ..... ....... ........
- 499f49/f496f499f44/f494f46
~
f f f f f f f k
O O O l
TLD DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA 45 I
40-
!\
\. !\
y 35- g, j,
- i*
? '\
. !lg\ ;\ !\
E . '
. lIll '.'\
IE ,\.: :i; i
e o O 3 0 -- "
. \'-)}
, f.
I ', .
' ,\
l l'.
'\
o' \\,
\ii
\, ,. .\ \ .
.l'l
'\
, ;l '.pl! l!/ ', ' -
fi9""* I6
('/'/'
25- \ '
\,'f ' f~ . , , 's,.i j
. , , , g, Legend
., ,,/'.,* ,
CONTROL
~ ....'.',*'
'., -l'~
- f U.A.S.& E.l. b.b. ?.? !
,f
, ...' nourr 20- , , , , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4fretf49/fref!ref!retfref!re ,
! ! ! ! f f f b
O .
O O TLD DIRECT RADIATION MONITORING PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA 46-40-36-S . ,'
? 1, S 30- ?-
w \ ,:
e v) :,.
O .
a ::: '
)
- /:
' .'. . .k
[.,
,6 t.. ...
lj,\q \ :
- \
L "._
' .... ;.J .
s%. :1
.: \};:j': '\.,t.;~~
'N ,. t .\.:A. ~.....y
<<, c. e
- s. (. ,,
Legend CONTROL Yl_83_T,O_ItS CEN,TE_R SWITCliYAllD 16- . . ....... .. . .... ...- '
- fr$ffr$ffr#ffr$/fr$/fr$/fr$ .
1
/ $ ! # # # # k
J-17 AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY, SAN CLEMENTE PREOPERATIONAL AND OPER,ATIONAL DATA O.7 06-l c: 0.6 - l
$ l h 0,4 -
a a
- 0. 3 - '
8 :
ll[ 02-O l- Figure 17a
, eaf[b T
$$/f/$#$$$$of/$/ff/f$48$$ T AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY .
PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS UNITS 1,2,3 1
0.8 -
- s. e !!
E oe-8 80.4-8 E '
f .
- , j risure un
,,_ !.y. . . .
~i ,
Legend 1 ;
- ; cosinot.
- l m. mss:
l 'l 'l 'l
- l 'i 'i 'l 'i
- I 'i
- ii 'i 'i 'll 'l 'l 'l ' ' ,
i
6 AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY J-18 PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS UNITS 2/3 1
i 0,4 -
l E I s 1 E o.3-
.9 S
a
.$. i O.2 -
i Figure 13a 0.1 -
Legend
. .A. .N. . .C. L. .E. M. . E. .N.
- *; i
- i j i ; i ; i j i i AIRBORNE PARTICULATES GROSS BETA ACTIVITY PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA SONGS UNITS 2/3 0.6 0.4 -
E 5
E o.3-a 0.2 - ,
i '
O.1 - Figure 18b O
re T? t CAM P. F.E,h D;E70) l
- *j i j i j e j i j i j i j i i I '
l . - -
~
.. ~
J-19 DRINKING WATER FILTRATE GROSS BETA ACTIVITY, SAN CLEMENTE FREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA
, , So t'
45-l 40-35-W a
E 30-E O 25-8 20-15 - -
Figure 19a 10 -
l ".8:
, +@h +@s*
O .
DRINKING WATER FILTRATE GROSS BETA ACTIVITY,TRI-CITIES P!!EOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA 90 80-70-
~'
60-
$0-
-- g 8
U 40-8
(
, 30-l 20-l
. . Figure 19b l 10- .. .
. . . . - 1
~
6
.<n. . = <
+@
& e e &
+ @e e o e #
J-19 DRINKING WATER FILTRATE GROSS BETA ACTIVITY, SAN CLEMENTE PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA l
45-
)
40-35-a E 30-W i 20-15-Figure 19a 10 -
' Legend
$nes . eses l M' # # e +@# # e e DRINKING WATER FILTRATE GROSS BETA ACTIVITY,TRI-CITIES PREOPERATIONAL AND OPERATIONAL DATA 90 80-70 --
60-50-U 40-8_
30- l 20-Figure 19b 10- -
. Le a e e +@e a e e
+@s-
.e .,
a-20 e
o
~ : -
m : .:i:
3 - ..
a ne m.,
- =:
...3 .,-
.3
> I H
t
\
y W ?-
V <*,-:. / s, 4px
' .L]
W ... ,.... ..... ,
w< g ,.... -
m1 ::..........'....................._,_
m4 . ,,
Oz .. . -
gQm ,....--.....,......--:r-O~Qp ........ w, /
w<z ., _ %' . ' -.
r,
&<wM < %. ,
Mb CA *... .:s / ,,
&a O y 'A . s e.~. ..Q. . . . . . . . . ,
w -ez..
A-M ZZ w < 'lll3 y.-- # :.~- .o*
)
M <. /-
4 a4 tm ..... *** ,1
$5 z @Z !...
- ( .
o<
\
O .O eaO ZMg g
e: ... ** ....- y-i
...... - *..... :, / .-
7wg g ........................................ -
de OO 4
..__ , 1 w c.......~~*".....-
yM aw ..... **, :, .
g .......~~ ,. ,<
w - c ......
p ..
'N g .
4 o n
R e
g .
e o 3 ~ -
O ua.i.11/satuno-00id i
1 1
)
1 1
l
~
i HISTORICAL TRENDING OF STRONTIUM-90 IN SOIL SONGS UNITS 1,2, AND 3 vs. CONTROL p
' o.o7 o o6-o.o6 - r r 5 % g
- 5. o.o4 - q .
5
! 0' j ou-
)
{ g ;
o.o2 - ,
4
!! % .s S ' -
s' l 0 P' nour. 2a
'% % g g N o.oi_
4
% !! ' % '% { kN
- 3 h,. hN k esd!! Mica
. a .. k>4@b ===
AB . - .s k o o, i@
75 76 U 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
[V YEAR HISTORICAL TRENDING OF CESIUM-137 IN SOIL SONGS UNITS I,2, AND 3 vs. CONTROL o.18 a.16-o.14 -
E o.12 -
e Je" /
g o 10- ,
N N !k <4
,E_ o.o s -
% p ,
! k g
h 5 l
% y
.g o.oe- q g ;g!
b I I' h:! !$jg %
oo4-N 3 S j j! @ %
3 ,S d !~ 'h Figure 21b
'h .4 ' 9 i $' 4 3
tige e tt l' 4 - ^:52 < L O' s ms & ih, . :, s ?:
N @ie{' s .,A%
1
===r 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR
J-22 COBALT-58 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT l vs. CONTROL ~
O oo o.25-o.2o -
z A l\
$o.w l\
.g .I \ .
a I\
.Q o.,o- / j \
l\\ j \
/ \/ \
n o.,. m o.o6 -
[
Legend
/ gf cw i g/ \ ^
a NEWPCRT BE ACH '
O.00 - ^
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 8'S YEAR COBALT-60 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 1
o.e - ,l \
I a I\
I\
$ oe- )
! l \
i I \
l
'5 o s - l \
8 1 I \
l \ l 02- ) \ Figure 22n
/ \ ,
/ ( A
/ y^
j Legend O g N^ p s s,
[ ,
l A NEWPCRT REACH jx nir:.
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR f ,
F
J-23 SILVER-ilom IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL O.036-0.030-i 0025-5, s /
OO20- \
.; \ I j\
yoa,.- ,I y
\
i j\ l
\
0.010 - \ !
! Figure 23a 00 5- \ \ Legend
[
( [ d NEWPCRT REACH 1 i
, . x em .
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR CESIUM-137 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT l vs. CONTROL O.10 t,
0.08- f I\
t I\
I \
i o o..
i l\
% ! \
o.o4 - j r9 l 8 I i \
~E \ l\\ l
\
\ l I / '
\/ \ Figure 23b O.02- {/
\
\l Lecend
\ a siwpcRTneaca O , , ,
k/
2 x em :-
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR l
l l
J-24 RADIUM-226 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL !
O 1.4 l
i 12- 'f l\
,. I\
i I\
I\
0" I \
5 l \
- 0. 0 -
f h I \, f
/ \
( \ h,/
a ~J / /
0.4 - g '
a 2-p/g \ \ j/
\i
\- risu.* 24.
l Legend i I6 NEWPCRT BEACH i lxemr:.
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR THORIUM-228 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 1
F 08-
. I % j
! / ,I \j l
/l\
>\
i n- / / \ !
s /g /\ / \
5 / / \ l
\ lI
\
8 l \
'! "Nl i l
\/
,f';
\
\ Y i \
v \
0.2 - Figure 24b i
Legend u
{ A NEWPCRT BEACH'
(
-I Om 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 YEAR l
J-25 COBALT-60 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT 2 vs. CONTROL O
0 0.i0 0.08-0.00- f g I\
1
/ \\
0.04- l ,
f $
l 8 I a
l \
j \ .
0.02-7
\ Fi,ur. 2s. ;
[ Legend
\ )
j \
a sr PcRrso4cs g, x wr 2 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR CESIUM-137 IN OCEAN BOTT0h'. SEDIMENTS !
SONGS UNIT 2 vs. CONTROL 0.04s l
0 040- I 0.035-0.030-z ^ b g 0 025- ,/ \, ,/ '\ ;
o *
\ \
& \
3 0.020- [ { i
'! \ / \ '
8 o.015 - k /
\ l \
"'o -
i / \ ,,, ,. 2s,
\ 1 1 l
0 005- \
t '/ Legend i
} ja srWPCRr RFACH; ggg - b i 2
^
P< Ellig_ _ _ j ,
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 f YEAR ,!
l
J-26 COBALT-60 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS
. SONGS UNIT 3 vs. CONTROL O Q 0.10 l
0.08-l h 0.00 -
e 2
0.04 -- ;
.i" lX \
j\
\
Om- / rio . m ;
\
\ Legend f
/
\\ [/ '
\ j s
j c sivecarnrica x estr a 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR CESIUM-137 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT 3 vs. CONTROL 0.06
'\
l
\ r 0.0, - I l\
\
l\ l\
I l\
t \
z I I\
g 0.03 - i i
I
\ l\
e I \
I
? I \, l \
1 0.02-
% I y \
l \ \
,,, . m 0.0,3 l \ \
Legend Q 0.00 _
\/
)\ '._, ,,
a sr.ecar er,cn
.78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR
m J-27 COBALT-58 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT 2 vs. CO,NTROL 0.07 l\
0 06-I\
0.05- l\
a l z I
\
- 0.04 -
l \
e I e \
.$ 0.03 - f
{
a l 8 \
1 0 02-I
\ Figure 27a '
'~
k Legend j g ,a so rcRretica lx esir e 78 79 SO 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR COBALT-58 IN OCEAN BOTTOM SEDIMENTS SONGS UNIT 3 vs. CONTROL 0.010 0.014 -
i ,
0.012 -
i I \
0.010 -
i I \
0.008-i I \
0.006-I \
0.004-figure 27b I \
I 0.002- Legend
] \
p /
_ m _ .. _ ..
\
6 NEWPCRT REACH '
o ..,,,
att - ;
78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 YEAR I
l e
i J-28 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF GHEEPHEAD UNIT I vs. CONTROL o.3o o.25-I Il i o.20- ll 5 II r
i O.16 -
!l f
E Il i
.g o.io-l1 i1 n 2 r. m 0.o6 -
/\ f \
ps Legend l jx j j a se. cor ms o.co _ a a _. _ _ _ a' _ _ N _._a_'; a? _ _ _ hr _
R 8 5 s 9 : e YEAR
. C2 Slum-137 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAb UNIT i vs. CONTROL o.oS I
f o os- \
l 1 i oon l'
- \
5 i
- I i
h o.o3-
- \
= l i 1 8 I l
o02- f f l
j\
k j\ \
\ /4 I
p 7 n o e,. m
) o.o,-
\,% x
,\ /\ l
\-
/.x.N /- V l A Legend O tj ' ~
, o.oo
.:' =~
b ""
'-~< '
e e a a = :
YEAR
J-29 COBALT-58 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNIT I vs. CONTROL o.2o -
1\
\\ '
\\
o.16 -
f g \\
z
\\
E I\
f o.10- l \
E I\
E s
I Ih '\
0 05- \
f ix / n , ,. m l
I
\ l\ l\ Leg jj ( Xj \
g /;7 la so.end pcarnrica
/' \!
l 0.00
.1 / . x ; . N =:
~ . . . . . =
YEAR COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNIT I vs. CONTROL o.36 o 30-
\\
o.25-z I\
la2o- y X l\
L f\ l\ l\ l 1 o ,. . \\ x j\ l\
l\
3 I\ l\/n I\
.8
" a,o - j \
\z I\
I\
I \ ; !\
l\ j \ \
l *\ n ,,,. n o os- I L \
\
\
I \
[\
l Q j\;/ I
(
w, \y'- -\Y,/ g,K y Legend a ~ r.-r .e-u
~'
oco.i-- ! -_D R 8 8 9 3 E YEAR l i,
O _
O O l
1 l
l CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNIT l vs. CONTROL O.018 O 016-2 I r O.014- '
/ r J N $
l 3 0.012 - % %
! 1; I .
3 3 3 $ s
', g 005- j -
? j
$ / /, '
%% /
.g o.008- ,'
f (' ',
j o ( / -
t U O.006- - '
$ G - / :
j i ', ',
f ' '
- b
, ! , , i ,
j' '
7 7 0.004- ,
?
j ; , Figure 30
?
7 gj j j
- 2- /
g ;
, ? , , 1.egend
, , CD NEWPQRT DEACH
- ; ? ;, , ;
', EE UNIT I o.000 ., , , , ,
p A" g o g p g gD q YEAR l h
J-31 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS UNIT I vs. CONTROL O .
/l
/t
\\ I
,.. I\ I i I I \
z I c I \
e
- i I \
1 '- I w* I l I
I \
I l h \ n
/\ l I
a l\ j \
"- l\ \R I \_l ,,,. . m i .
I ,k
\/\ l I /
l \ .4 \ / ltegena 0
d *\
_1 -2 k *; V,- I _ _ _ ' _ _ _%'^& c"."l' """'"
F' R e E 2 0 E YEAR CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS UNIT I vs. CONTROL i 6.0 A
11 5.0 -
t .o lI z
5 ii '
E' 33o- Il ia I\ \
l 1
l\
I\
i #o- !\
l\ y ; ,l \
I ' i
\\ l
\
,,,2,. m i
,o- ; t
- ,l i\
j Legend j
O ... . _ . _1 I \
1 1
\
1iti I a --,nucu r< e= 1 R 8 E & 2 E YEAR
l J-32 !
COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD )
UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL ,
ye.0 il l!
5.0 - j' I
ll
\\
Y 'o- i i l l\
I l
!! 3.0 - ll I
g I
'8 l\ !.
2.0 -
\ \
i I I noor. :n
'o-
\\
l 7 { j , Legend I
j 6 NEWPCRT REVH 1 "'"2' 00 m m .m ..
~ . = . . . .
i YEAR CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL a020 X
f 0.016 -
f I\ 1 i i \ \ /\\
s ,I i /
Ti /
b g 0 0,0 -
'\ i
) \'l\b.i x w [\ /
l\}y \<
1 8
i x
l 'sy / \w / \
s I '
8 \ /
o yy ._m
/
a G
[s /
0.005--
\/
t II
\'
'A sigure un
, Legend k' ja stwPent prxen r, -,, , ,
R 8 = 2 2 a YEAR
J-33 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNITS 2/3 vs. CON, TROL o.6 0.7 -
I\
O.6 - ll N
% 0.6 -
I\
- ll o 4-i ii g o.3-i j O2-I l / nw . 32.
I 0'~ \
lk Legend
,,_ f% j k
%wl f
\
-Af ['A d NEWPCRT BucH v emez, R 8 5 a 9 8 YEAR CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL 0.016 0 014-t
(
o ot2- j g
$ ! !\l^ \
5 0 010 - j 5
s
\
I
\\
\' \\y\
h***~ I f
8 \ \% i lt l o ** \ t\
j ; ,/
O.004-- 4 1 ; lI x l
QI \ &
t' nw. sn o "2 -
l
/y\ h
\
\ /- ,f Legend
= . . - -
O
\ <
.i >
\l p. cm, n
\.
n , a u - - -
YEAR
J-34 COBALT-60 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL ~
O -
i 0.35- \\
0.30- \\ :
i i
0.25- I\
0.20-
- x l {
5~
a l \
l'\ i\l\
,r]\ l t 0,0- j
\ l\\ l;
\
o ,.r. m I I
[\W;f +)I v'
"'~
% ??.',"c", mcu 0.00 ff _ _ _ _ _
f.-
lx essrs 2a YEAR CESIUM-137 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL 8.0 R
7.0 -
ll 60- '
f{
i Il !1 g n- g. I\ l'
\
c x Il l\
5 "- y l\ \\ l
\
.i l\ l\ \\ l\
e3n- l\ 'b I\\\ \
\
R l' j I '\ \ \ l
\ \
an-I j\ l \\\ l
\
- ~
- \ ,\ j \; ; I n , c. m f kf k Legend
,\ a - c , - cu:
G 0 0.. ,, ,i _
j \
o, e m .- m l
- l. _ _ \\ \ [\
I 1 L
R E E E E E E YEAR l
I
l J-35 COBALT-58 IN FLESH OF CRUSTACEA UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL 0.30 0.25-I\
020-z I\
i I\
0.15-f
.; i \
s 8 I \
.O 0.10-I \
Figure 3$a l
0.05- I
'F{
l ) A
/\ ! Legend 6 NEWPCRT REVH
,.,,m m m s
m
/
_m s
mm m m m a
x_.m m m m m .a
!x anz3
~ . = . . . .
O COBALT-58 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS YEAR UNITS 2/3 vs. CONTROL 0.40 0.35-
\,\
0.30-fI Y
E 0.25 -
f
\
I g 020-
.E l\
l
- l. 0.15 -
l ..
t j\
I
- '*- I\
,I ; h ,\ . . ,,5
! \
0 05 ~
X 'i Legend l
y n/ -. _ _ _ .{\/
x a srwPent nrvu 0 00 m,_ l1 .__ ___
Vv x ___m m m x -n z ,
k O b N $ E $
YEAR
J-36 COBALT-58 IN FLESH OF SHEEPHEAD UNIT I vs. CONTROL O 0.00 h
l\
0.025-I\
0.020-l\
z j f\
i l *\
g 0 015 - 4
= l \
8 ; ,
1 8 \
8 0010- k a o I
\
I i n2ur, m 0.006- f j I
, Legend j k ja st=pentnrsca i l f ! :x csir:
. - c, , us l ~ .o . .~ . . .
YEAR C08 ALT-58 IN FLESH OF MOLLUSKS UNIT I vs. CONTROL 14 12 -
i 10 - f 1 l1 z i I ,i 5
. s- j 5 l \
% I\
8 a-
' h ll 8 ll
\\
l l n , ,. m
- I
ri f g Legend l6 NEWPeR 3
l O
__ A. _ m- . . . _ . . . - .
~
1 7.~-
YEAR
o ,,
s Southern California Edison Company P. O BOX 800 2 244 W ALNUT GROVE AVENU E ROSEME AD. C ALIFO RNI A 917 70 M.O.MEDFORD Tetse oNa M AN AGER, NUCLE AR LaCENSeNG 19181302i us-April 30, 1986 .
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region V 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator
Dear Sir:
Subject:
Docket No. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362 San Onofre Units 1, 2 and 3 Enclosed are three copies of the radiological environmental monitoring related report entitled:
" Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 1985."
This report is submitted in accordance with the requirements for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13, Appendix A, Section 6.9.1.6 and Units 2 and 3 Operating License Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15, Appendix A, Section 6.9.1.6 and provides detailed environmental impact analyses and data.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning this report.
Very truly yours, Enclosures g cc: Document Control Desk, NRC (18)
F. R. Huey (NRC Resident Inspector)
Richard F. Dudle Harry Rood (NRC)y (NRC) i , lI H. T. Sipe, California Public Utilities Commission California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region J. O. Ward, California Department of Health Services