ML20199C061
| ML20199C061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/14/1997 |
| From: | Mckenna E NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Essig T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9711190205 | |
| Download: ML20199C061 (27) | |
Text
.
November 14. 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig,' Acting Chief Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Eileen McKenna, Seniot Reactor Engineer Original Signed By:
Generic issues and Environmental c
Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i
GUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF NOVEMBER 13,1997, MEETING WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE
,c t
On November 13,1997, David Matthews, Deputy Director of the Division of Reactor Program t
Mcnagement, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regtbtion, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, met with attendees at the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the Willard Hotelin Washington D.C. The Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse is a consortium of 23 nuclear utilities formed to follow NRC activities related to licensing and design bases issues
~
Mr. Matthews spoke to the meeting attendees on the status of NRC activities conceming to
. irnplementation of 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, tests and experiments) and related issues. His presentation slides are provided in the attachment.
Attachment:
Presentation Slides cci Mr. Randy Fitzgerald Winston and Strawn Counsel for Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse 1400 L Street Washington D.C. 20005-3502 f")p' ~)]'
'^
Distribution:
Hard Cooy (w/att )'
E-Mail (w/o atti Central Files SCollins JRoe SMagruder PUBLIC FMiraglia DMatthews
//'l M 7 PGEB r/f BSheron TEssig WDean, DEDR
~8 p p / U 74 3 EMcKenna
- FGillespie FAkstulewicz RZimmerman MMalloy.
g ACRS
/\\
X L.
Document Name: g:\\emm\\MSUM1113.97 /
/,
/Mf*;1'9 OFFICE Ph$b)
SC:PGbh:htPM(A)C:PGEd:DRPM NAME EMcKenna:sw FAkNebicz TEssigY LT DATE' 11//y'/97 11/N /97 11/11//97 J
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-. g g.3 p
wh -
.g d H' H Hi Hi I Hl l H l.I
- 31. H,1,1ll l li, I ll 9711190205 V71114 4
PDR ORQ NRRA
s uruq p
- yk UNITED STATES
.s-
'1 NUCLiiEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-4 WAsHINnTON, D.C. enmaa mg A****
November 14, 1997 MEMORANDUM TO: Thomas H. Essig. Acting Chief-
- Generic issues and Environmental Projects Branch DMsion of Reactor Program Management Omce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
' FROM:
Eiieen McKenr a, Senior Reactor Engineer Generic lasues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF NOVEMBER 13,1997, MEETING WITH THE LICENSING AND DESIGN BASES CLEARINGHOUSE On November 13,1997, David Matthews, Deputy Director.of the Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, met with attendees at the Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse at the Willard Hotel in Washington D.C. The Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse is a consortium of 23 nuclear utilities formed to follow NRC activities related to licensing and design bases issues.
1 Mr. Matthews spoke to the meeting attendees on the status of NRC activities conceming to implementation of 10 CFR 50.59 (Changes, tests and experiments) and related issues. His presentation slides are provided in the attachment.
Attachment:
Presentation Slides cc: Mr. Randy Fitzgerald Winston and Strawn Counsel for Licensing and Design Bases Clearinghouse 1400 L Street Washington D.C. 20005-3502
\\
~.
u,s j
l ga as o
(
- c
++**+
1 l
STATUS OF ACTIONS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF i
10 CFR 50.59 AND RELATED ISSUES November 13,1997 David B. Matthews i
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
?
s l
Attachment
I i
BRIEFING OUTLINE i
i e
Background
f e
Overview of SECY-97-205 i
- public comments on NUREG-1606
- integration process
- development of recommendations i
e Discussion of staff recommended actions l
e 2
m
t I
Sgc.y 9 7_.o 3 c Integration 4
50.59 Process issues RW
/
Process Y
SA4 W AcGwities Underway
, r Regulatory Proce=- p pg Ins W ions cnd Ithgration Process Policy issues i
Reviews a
i t
i n
l 586/97--#74 i
, e M***
f)f Lessons cu d l
4
$rd d 5 0 hN v
Other Regulatory Process issues l
3
- !;l
- l
- ',ll!tl!
i!
e n
n o
o d
t s
e
)
s s
t e
l n
c t
5 l
n e
o i
0 e
M m
pr 2
m m
e
-7 m
v o
r t
o e
o 9
c p
w t
r t
m o
Y c
ro h
i i
l C
b h
y n
E u
s r
o p
n o
S t
n
(
f o
a o
o l
R e
u t
i t
d s
g a
E n
a n e
d P
e o
r 4
A m
mi n
t r
e s
s c o
m P
s s a f
N s
rd s
m e
e s
ge n
o O
a6 o n o
c r
r it e
IS n0 pa p
r a6 e
S sL o
a)5 s1 e
s s
I n
s s
M iG sn n
d o
t en aE uo e
M nR cs s
vt ii t
O oU ss e
op e
r r
C CN DL P
P (O i
i
!:?
!!!l!l:l
,!t l,
ij s
n o
it i
dn o
c S
T g
n N
m i
E r
o M
f n
M o
c O
n y
t o
i C
n d
e e c
d l
i d
e S
sp a
M n
v Td a
f y
l a
o e et e
O r
v ys ct h
5 d
n na nn R
e t
aeie o
i F
d r
r t
s r
ce e
a o nbf e
i r
a f
S g
Q i
i f
r g
E e
S e
seyiad n
d t
eb U
U a
s ma h
i r
r S
o a
c ay f
c f
b as o
S f
d me a
d 9
i l
t o
cn I
nyno f
Y 5
r h
at ei o
a s
i t
0 t
e si u c n
E 5
s l
r nb qn o
K e
h ae u
t i
i f
r t
g o
rb sf i
e n
Q ao nl n
t
~
a i
r o
f s
a S
mpcm e
l U
P U
D
=
- li
- lllI!f il
-l iil j
1
l
!ll!:!
!l l;
ll) w e
n s
n n
o itc e
g p
n n
s i
o n
d n
s uo S
i i
t n
e lcp
+
E e
d o
n u r
n i
I c
t i
a c
,d T
s id s
e s e IV w
p el i
e t
s i
n e
t r
I m
v s
i T
e v
i i
C m
e g
t t e
n cn r
A ae c
9 n
r e
nm 6
G o
5 e
ai t f
sn N
n 0
s p m )g l
ni e
5 n og m
t I
O d
d oin n
n oi i t e
n n
t c
e cy c
G a
a e
f e pm mf ir N
e e
ps e
eoe c
c s
t v
v n
t O
n n
ni s
o y
rh d I
a a
gms p g n
i d
l i
p nay msa iu r
m et i
i G
et e
eg r
o f
svn 9
c eE a
s oi nAS e
k 5
R cCc ig rRa o
0 A
n r
5 S
E P N (t e
e i:;
il l
!l!
i i
I INTEGRATION PROCESS Identify NRR Commitments / Issues l
Resolve near-term regulatory problems Establish process for synthesis of issues l
~
Establish process for evaluation of options
(
Develop options that target regulatory issues in a l
cohesive and comprehensive manner l
l 7
OPTION 5 l
i GL 91-18/IMC 9900 Guidance on 50.59 role in i
i resolution of degraded or nonconforming conditions 10 CFR 50.59 Rulemaking l
l l
Examination of enforcement policy for 10 CFR 50.59 l
l l
Guidance /rulemaking on SAR updating
)
Development of risk-informed framework to revise l
existing regulations 4
i
t!!l ri;l l;
)!\\ ;
7 99 1
re
- g b
n m
s i
k e
i 9
a s
c 5
m ya e
t b e
e/
D 0
u f d l
ae n
5 y
r i
i sf t
i n
d i
f t y
o r
e on t
R a
s i
e s
i F
c o
nd l
l ic s
C d
o r
r e
f p
aigi a
m i
i n
r ear m
0 a
p t
e ma i
h o
1 y
r r
t o
cf s
t C
n i
f oi" o
N l
d i
gQt o
b d
l 9
onr t
O a
e t
p h
oaSe l
st Ug a
eim"a i
s G
o n
t n
t e
e l
r N
d v
hf w mh m
i i
i t
eor dh e "c b
v e
IK o
d Q
u t
r A
p g
Soof o
f f f
s n
U o
r M
o t
e nn n
o i
b ooo n o f
E s
oi t i i t t i t d
L s
naat a
e i
occ a c u
e t
l U
s n
ni i i if f i f d
R o
e siimi i
r r
r e
p m
vaaia h
ru e
el l
l l
l r
ccec c
P E
S il ll 4
i
- iii
- !!!l
!!i:i!.
lI !!
llI'
,l!;
s fo n
s o
i s n t
e o a
l n
l pi o
t mla io s
vi t n
ao r
e o
xi e v or t
i f
c Y
e s
a l
d si o
t C
ea e
v d
l i
hd v
I r
L s
o ip ef 9
O b
5 u
l l
yd P
aR t
e 0
tsA ir e
5 T
eS en v
r N
nd ed o
E on sn f
a i
l sa n
e M
iv9 os n
0 1
Q a
E e5 y
P r
cS C
y0 U
w i
l R
c5 o
h p g e
O o o n
v r
i F
Pf f iov e
R N
6 s
l n o l
9 e
o v t
E n
n 9
v i
1 e
t e
i au9 m
l r
y et a 5 e
l c
bi v0 r
r oe e5 o
t v
f c e ef n
Os Ro E
=
- i:i!
f!j!!ii:
i
. - _ = _ _. _ _ _ _.
i l
l GUIDANCE /RULEMAKING ON SAR CONTENT i
l l
Staff proposed to develop approach on SAR updating:
l l
1 l
to incorporate changes since initial licensing l
to include a process by which information could be l
eliminated from SAR to update more risk-significant information first l
to consider enforcement discretion for full completion Current Status i
i 4
Meeting with NEI; they propose to provide draft guidance i
i on SAR updating in November Staff developing generic letter for public comment l
Il
){
i
i i
RISK-INFORMED FRAMEWORK i
increased use of risk-informed regulatory approaches i
and graded requirements i
i I
Develop common scope of systems, structures and components subject to operational rules t
)
Requirements for corrective action processes, promptness and closure t
Staff to provide framework and ANPR to Commission for i
public comment in February 1998 l
i 12
_-