|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20212A7381999-09-10010 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 174 to License NPF-49 ML20211G9631999-08-30030 August 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valves ML20210U0881999-08-13013 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 239 & 173 to Licenses DPR-65 & NPF-49,respectively ML20210Q1401999-08-12012 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 238 to License DPR-65 ML20209G3061999-07-13013 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 237 to License DPR-65 ML20209D6581999-07-0202 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 172 to License NPF-49 ML20196J2191999-06-30030 June 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee USI A-46 Implementation Program,In General,Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff Sser 2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20196H1621999-06-29029 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 236 to License DPR-65 ML20207G6411999-06-0303 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 105,235 & 171 to Licenses DPR-21,DPR-65 & NPF-49,respectively ML20206M4631999-05-11011 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Alternative Proposed by Licensee to Perform Ultrasonic Exam on Inner Surface of Nozzle to safe-end Weld ML20206G6221999-05-0404 May 1999 SER Accepting Util Request to Apply leak-before-break Status to Pressurizer Surge Line Piping for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2 ML20205S5341999-04-16016 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 169 to License NPF-49 ML20205N3601999-04-12012 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 233 to License DPR-65 ML20205G0191999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 168 to License NPF-49 ML20204H7131999-03-17017 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That NNECO Provided Adequate Justification for Deviations from RG 1.97,Rev 2, Recommendations,For Instrumentation Monitoring CST Level & Containment Area Radiation at Mnps Unit 2 ML20205G4781999-03-12012 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 231 to License DPR-65 ML20205G8671999-03-11011 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 230 to License DPR-65 ML20204C9441999-03-10010 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Request for License Amend to Revise Frequency of Certain SRs for Electrical Power Sys ML20205G4591999-03-10010 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 229 to License DPR-65 ML20204E7581999-03-10010 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 228 to License DPR-65 ML20207L2631999-03-0505 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-21 ML20207L5961999-02-22022 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Code Requirements,Which Require 100 Percent Volumetric Exam of RPV flange-to-shell, Impractical to Perform to Extent Required & That Alternative Provide Reasonable Assurance of Structural Integrity ML20203D7601999-02-11011 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Millstone 1 Certified Fuel Handler Training & Retraining Program ML20203J3191999-02-10010 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 227 to License DPR-65 ML20199H9181999-01-20020 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 224 to License DPR-65 ML20198S7801998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 223 to License DPR-65 ML20198E1471998-12-18018 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 222 to License DPR-65 ML20198E0571998-12-17017 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 221 to License DPR-65 ML20196B0501998-11-24024 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee 960213 Submittal of 180-day Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Plant,Unit 2 ML20155K1981998-11-0909 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Re Application of leak-before-break Status to Portions of Safety Injection & Shutdown Cooling Sys ML20195B8711998-11-0909 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Approving Revised Evaluation of Primary Cold Leg Piping leak-before-break Analysis for Plant ML20155C3781998-10-30030 October 1998 SER Denying Amend to Allow Changes to Fsar.Nrc Found That NNECO Had Not Considered Diversity Provided by Switch in Control Room That Removes Power to 1 of 2 MOV in SDC Sys Flow Path in Evaluation of High Low Pressure Design ML20155C8441998-10-29029 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposal to Withdraw ATWS Test Commitment ML20153D8921998-09-23023 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 163 to License NPF-49 ML20238F2781998-08-27027 August 1998 SER Related to Proposed Rev 20 to Northeast Utilities Quality Assurance Program Topical Rept for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Units 1,2 & 3 ML20237D4681998-08-21021 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 219 to License DPR-65 ML20237D5001998-08-20020 August 1998 SER Approving Code Case N-389-1, Alternative Rules for Repairs,Replacements,Or Mods,Section Xi,Div 1 ML20236Y5601998-08-0707 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 162 to License NPF-49 ML20236U7051998-07-22022 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting All Requests for Relief W/Exception of Requests RR-89-17 (Authorized for Class 1 Sys Only) & RR-89-21.Requests RR-13 & RR-14 Will Be Addressed in Separate Evaluation ML20236K3531998-07-0101 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 218 to License DPR-65 ML20236K6971998-07-0101 July 1998 SER Accepting Third 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan,Rev 2 & Associated Request for Relief & Proposed Alternatives for Plant,Unit 2 ML20249C2541998-06-24024 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Rev 19 to NNECO QAP Topical Rept & Amended Through 980609.Informs That NNECO Exception to Provisions in Paragraph 10.3.5 of Constitutes Temporary & Acceptable Alternative ML20249C0491998-06-22022 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 217 to License DPR-65 ML20249B0751998-06-16016 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 216 to License DPR-65 ML20248K9271998-06-0505 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 161 to License NPF-49 ML20248J0031998-06-0404 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Millstone Nuclear Power Station Emergency Plan ML20248M2991998-06-0202 June 1998 Safety Evaluation Approving Application Re Restructuring of Central Maine Power Co by Establishment of Holding Company ML20248A8291998-05-27027 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License NPF-49 ML20248C4131998-05-26026 May 1998 SER of Individual Plant Exam of External Events Submittal on Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3 ML20248A3221998-05-26026 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 215 to License DPR-65 1999-09-10
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217P5391999-10-25025 October 1999 Rev 0,Change 1 to Millstone Unit 1 Northeast Utils QA Program 05000336/LER-1999-012, :on 990917,unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 Was Noted.Caused by Grounded Coil Wire for Lower Gripper Assembly.Leads Leading to Lower Gripper Coil Were Insulated1999-10-15015 October 1999
- on 990917,unrecoverable CEA Misalignment Entry Into TS 3.0.3 Was Noted.Caused by Grounded Coil Wire for Lower Gripper Assembly.Leads Leading to Lower Gripper Coil Were Insulated
ML20217C8721999-10-0606 October 1999 Rev 21,change 3 to MP-02-OST-BAP01, Nuqap Topical Rept, App F & G Only B17898, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With B17896, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With B17894, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With ML20216J4341999-09-24024 September 1999 Mnps Unit 3 ISI Summary Rept,Cycle 6 05000336/LER-1999-011, :on 990823,thermal Reactor Power Limit Was Exceeded.Caused by Lack of Conservatism in Procedures & Alarm Setpoints Used to Limit Reactor Power.Revised Operating Procedures1999-09-20020 September 1999
- on 990823,thermal Reactor Power Limit Was Exceeded.Caused by Lack of Conservatism in Procedures & Alarm Setpoints Used to Limit Reactor Power.Revised Operating Procedures
ML20212A7381999-09-10010 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 174 to License NPF-49 05000245/LER-1999-001-02, :on 990810,discovered That Stack Flow Monitor Four H LCO Action Statement Had Not Been Met.Caused by Personnel Error.Frequency of LCO Action Was Increased & Personnel Involved Received Coaching.With1999-09-0808 September 1999
- on 990810,discovered That Stack Flow Monitor Four H LCO Action Statement Had Not Been Met.Caused by Personnel Error.Frequency of LCO Action Was Increased & Personnel Involved Received Coaching.With
05000336/LER-1999-010, :on 990804,noted Failure to Perform ASME Section XI IST on Pressurizer Relief Line Flow Control Sample Valve.Caused by Inadequate man-machine Interface. Planning Personnel Will Be Briefed on QC Program Indicators1999-09-0202 September 1999
- on 990804,noted Failure to Perform ASME Section XI IST on Pressurizer Relief Line Flow Control Sample Valve.Caused by Inadequate man-machine Interface. Planning Personnel Will Be Briefed on QC Program Indicators
ML20211N8401999-09-0202 September 1999 Rev 21,change 1 to Northeast Utils QA TR, Including Changes Incorporated Into Rev 20,changes 9 & 10 ML20216F5141999-08-31031 August 1999 Rept on Status of Public Petitions Under 10CFR2.206 B17878, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Mnps,Unit 1.With B17879, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2.With B17874, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20211G9631999-08-30030 August 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valves ML20210U0881999-08-13013 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 239 & 173 to Licenses DPR-65 & NPF-49,respectively ML20210Q1401999-08-12012 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 238 to License DPR-65 B17856, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1.With B17858, Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20211A6561999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2 ML20210J0311999-07-21021 July 1999 Rev 20,Change 10 to QAP 1.0, Organization ML20210E5931999-07-19019 July 1999 Revised Page 16 of 21,to App F of Northeast Util QA Program Plan ML20210C5911999-07-15015 July 1999 Revised Rev 20,change 10 to Northeast Util QA Program TR, Replacing Summary of Changes ML20210A0411999-07-15015 July 1999 Rev 20,change 10 to Northeast Util QA Program Tr ML20209G3061999-07-13013 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 237 to License DPR-65 B17814, Special Rept:On 990612 B Train EDG Failed to Restart within 5 Minutes Following Completion of 18 Month 24 H Endurance Run Required by TS 4.8.1.1.2.g.7.Caused by Procedural inadequacy.Re-performed Hot Restart Via Manual Start1999-07-12012 July 1999 Special Rept:On 990612 B Train EDG Failed to Restart within 5 Minutes Following Completion of 18 Month 24 H Endurance Run Required by TS 4.8.1.1.2.g.7.Caused by Procedural inadequacy.Re-performed Hot Restart Via Manual Start ML20209D6581999-07-0202 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 172 to License NPF-49 ML20209D1881999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 20,change 9 to Northeast Util QA Program Tr ML20209J0541999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Unit 2 ML20196J1821999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 21,Change 0 to Northeast Utilities QAP (Nuqap) Tr ML20196A8451999-06-30030 June 1999 Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept B17833, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Power Station,Unit 1.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Power Station,Unit 1.With ML20196K1791999-06-30030 June 1999 Addendum 6 to Millstone Unit 2 Annual Rept, ML20196J2191999-06-30030 June 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee USI A-46 Implementation Program,In General,Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff Sser 2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20211A6751999-06-30030 June 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 2,providing Revised Average Daily Unit Power Level & Operating Data Rept B17830, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With ML20196H1621999-06-29029 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 236 to License DPR-65 05000423/LER-1999-007-01, :on 990518,discharge Filter Associated with Crss Cubicle Sump Pump 3DAS-8A,was Determined to Be Contaminated.Caused by Back Leakage from Contaminated Drains Feeding Into ECCS Pump.Lines Modified.With1999-06-17017 June 1999
- on 990518,discharge Filter Associated with Crss Cubicle Sump Pump 3DAS-8A,was Determined to Be Contaminated.Caused by Back Leakage from Contaminated Drains Feeding Into ECCS Pump.Lines Modified.With
05000423/LER-1999-006-01, :on 990516,both Reactor Plant Aerated Drains SR Air Driven Sump Pumps Failed During TRM Surveillance.Caused by Inadequate Preventive Maint Program Design.Surveillance Procedure Sp 3635B.2 Will Be Conducted Monthly1999-06-15015 June 1999
- on 990516,both Reactor Plant Aerated Drains SR Air Driven Sump Pumps Failed During TRM Surveillance.Caused by Inadequate Preventive Maint Program Design.Surveillance Procedure Sp 3635B.2 Will Be Conducted Monthly
05000423/LER-1999-004-01, :on 990516,ESFA of Numerous Plant Components on Restoration of a Train Sequencer Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Direction.Issued Brief to Operations Describing Inadvertent Sequencer LOP Event.With1999-06-14014 June 1999
- on 990516,ESFA of Numerous Plant Components on Restoration of a Train Sequencer Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Direction.Issued Brief to Operations Describing Inadvertent Sequencer LOP Event.With
ML20195H1011999-06-11011 June 1999 Rev 20,change 8 to Northeast Utilities QAP (Nuqap) TR 05000423/LER-1999-005-01, :on 990510,failure to Perform Surveillance on RCS Pressurizer Heater Penetration Breakers Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Mgt Support.Required Surveillance of Identified Ten Breakers Was Completed1999-06-0808 June 1999
- on 990510,failure to Perform Surveillance on RCS Pressurizer Heater Penetration Breakers Was Noted.Caused by Lack of Mgt Support.Required Surveillance of Identified Ten Breakers Was Completed
05000423/LER-1999-003-01, :on 990505,identified That 18 Month EDG Surveillance Test for LOP with ESF Start Did Not Initiate Test.Caused by Inadequate Understanding of Regulatory Guidance. a & B EDG Returned to Status.With1999-06-0404 June 1999
- on 990505,identified That 18 Month EDG Surveillance Test for LOP with ESF Start Did Not Initiate Test.Caused by Inadequate Understanding of Regulatory Guidance. a & B EDG Returned to Status.With
ML20207G6411999-06-0303 June 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 105,235 & 171 to Licenses DPR-21,DPR-65 & NPF-49,respectively ML20209J0661999-05-31031 May 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Unit 2 ML20211B7351999-05-31031 May 1999 Cycle 7 Colr B17804, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 2.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Mnps,Unit 2.With B17808, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3.With 1999-09-08
[Table view] |
Text
H
]
g ase g
[
k UNITED STATE 8 g
}
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\\...../
WASHINGTON, D.C. E1eH001 SAFETY EVALUATION PY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION i
I RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 22 4 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-65 NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY l-THE CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY U
THE WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNIT NO. 2 l
]
DOCKET NO. 50-336 l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 4,1998, the Northeast Nuclear Energy Company, et al. (the licensee),
L submitted a request for changes to the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 2 (MNPS-2) i Technical Specifications (Tbs). The requested changes would change the TS requirements l
relating to the condensate storage tank (CST) and also add a new TS that would establish l.
requirements for the atmospheric steam dump valves (ASDVs) to assure their operability. The L
applicable TS Bases for the CST would also be modified to reflect the proposed changes and a new TS Bases Section would be added to discuss the new TS for the ASDVs.
2.0 EVALUATION i
The first portion of the amendment request would modify TS 3.7.1.3, " Plant Systems -
Condensate Storage Tank," by increasing the minimum required CST level from 150,000 gallons to 165,000 gallons to account for the discharge nozzle pipe elevation above
?
the tank bottom and vortex formation occurring in the CST at the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) j system supply piping entrance.
The CST is required to maintain an adequate volume of water for the following three conditions, to: (1) remove decay heat and sensible heat to cool down the plant to less than
^ 300 'F following a loss of offsite power (LOOP) event; (2) remove only decay heat to maintain
~ ~
the plant in's hot standby condition for 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />; and (3) remove decay heat and sensible heat to be able to cope with an 8-hour station blackout (SBO) event.
L Conditions 1 and 3 require 136,000 gallons of water and Condition 2 requires 115,000 gallons of water. These requirements are well within the current TS requirement of 150,000 gations; however, there is an unusable volume of water in the CST due to the location of the discharge j
nozzle and vortex formation occurring in the CST where the AFW system supply piping enters.
9901120004 981231 i
PDR ADOCK 05000336 F
. P.
PDR m
-a 2-t The licensee has determined that the unusable volume of water due to the location of the discharge nozzle is approximately 15.000 gallons and the unusable volume of water due to the vortex formation is approximately 8,000 gallons for a total volume of 23,000 gallons of unusable water in the CST. Conditions 1 and 3 require a total CST volume of 159,000 gallons of water and Condition 2 requires 138,000 gallons of water when the unusable water in the CST is taken into consideration. Thus, the current requirement of 150,000 gallons is not adequate for Conditions 1 and 3. The applicable TS Bases section will be updated to reflect the proposed change in the CST water volume to account for the unusable stored water.
The proposed change to TS 3.7.1.3 will increase the minimum allowable volume of water in the CST to 165,000 gallons, which bounds the amount of water needed for the conditions noted above, and also includes a margin of about 6,000 gallons. This change is well within the total capacity of the CST, which is 250,000 gallons, and the TS required volume of water will be stored within the missile protected portion (205,000 gallon-level) of the CST.
Therefore, the NRC staff has determined, based on the previous discussion, that the proposed change to TS 3.7.1.3 relating to the required minimum water volume in the CST is acceptable.
The updated TS Bases adequately reflect the proposed TS change.
The second portion of the request would add a new TS section, TS 3.7.1.7, " Plant Systems -
Atomospheric Steam Dump Valves," to provide the requirements necessary to assure that the ASDVs will be available to remove heat from the reactor coolant system (RCS) to either maintain the unit in hot standby or cool down the unit to shutdown cooling (SDC) entry i
conditions if the condenser steam dump valves are not available.
i The atmospheric steam dump system at MNPS-2 consists of one ASDV for each of the two steam generators..The design does not include remotely controlled block valves to isolate the ASDVs, however, each of the ASDVs can be isolated by a local manually controlled isolation valve.
1 l
Proposed TS 3.7.1.7 requires each of the two ASDVs to be operable in Modes 1,2, and 3. If one ASDV is inoperable, it has to be restored to operable within 7 days or be in Mode 3 in the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and Mode 4 within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. If both the ASDVs are inoperable, one has to be restored to operable within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or be in Mode 3 within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in Mode 4 within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> reflects the potentialimpact on plant cooldown time with one or both ASDVs inoperable.
Proposed TS 4.7.1.7 requires that one complete cycle of each ASDV be verified at least once per 18 months.
Proposed TS 3.7.1.7 and TS 4.7.1.7 constitute additionallimitations, restrictions, or controls not presently included in the TSs, and are consistent, to the extent practical, with the guidance provided in NUREG-1432, Rev.1, " Standard Technical Specifications Combustion Engineering Plants," dated April 1995. The proposed TSs are, therefore, acceptable. The new TS Bases, 3/4.7.1.7, adequately reflect the new TSs.
l
.p-m.
r-, - -
ry-vw-t
-T' YT
WW
'"N
^
b e
! 3.0 STATE CONSULTATIO.f3 in accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Connecticut State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
(
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSfDERATION The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no l
significant increase in the amounts, and no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (63 FR 45526 dated August 26,1998). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be i
p'epared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
5.0
' CONCLUSION 1
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activitiet. sill be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
J I
Principal Contribution:
D. Mcdonald Date:
December 31, 1998 l
s