|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20210T2161999-08-0606 August 1999 Draft SE Supporting Proposed Conversion of Current TS to ITS for Plant ML20206G7471999-05-0404 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Corrective Actions Taken by SNC to Ensure That Valves Perform Intended Safety Functions & Concluding That SNC Adequately Addressed Requested Actions in GL 95-07 ML20199D8611999-01-12012 January 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request for Inservice Insp Program for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20195E2281998-11-16016 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request for Second 10-year ISI Program Relief Request 56 for Plant,Unit 1 ML20155E0271998-10-29029 October 1998 SER Approving & Denying in Part Inservice Testing Program Relief Requests for Plant.Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-3 & Q2P16-RR-V Denied Since Requests Do Not Meet Size Requirement of GL 89-04 ML20154B6121998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Second 10-year ISI Requests for Relief RR-13 & RR-49 Through RR-55 for Jm Farley NPP Unit 1 ML20237C5471998-08-20020 August 1998 Suppl to SE Re Amends 137 & 129 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Respectively.Se Being Supplemented to Incorporate Clarifications/Changes & Revise Commitment for Insp of SG U-bends in Rows 1 & 2 for Unit 2 Only ML20236U6141998-07-23023 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Use of Alternative Alloy 690 Welds (Inco 52 & 152) as Substitute for Other Weld Metal ML20236R8671998-07-0909 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Southern Nuclear Operating Co USI A-46 Implementation Program Has Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff SSER-2 on GIP-2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20217D2591998-04-21021 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Alternative Re Augmented Exam of Reactor Vessel Shell Welds for Plant ML20217H3191998-03-31031 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Plant Matl Surveillance Programs ML20217D4081998-03-24024 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Maintain Calibration Info Required by ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ML20216H6731998-03-17017 March 1998 SER Accepting Quality Assurance Program Description Change for Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20199B0371998-01-22022 January 1998 SER Accepting Request for Relief (RR-27) for Plant,Units 1 & 2 from Certain Provisions of Section XI to ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code.Relief Will Remove Insulation on ASME Code Class 1 Sys During Inservice Insp ML20198R5221997-10-29029 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 132 & 124 to Licenses NPF-02 & NPF-08,respectively ML20216G9521997-09-0404 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Request for Relief for IEEE 279-1971,Section 4.7.3 Requirements Concerning Steam Generator Water Level Control ML20236N3331997-08-21021 August 1997 SER Re Request for Interpretation of EDG TS 4.8.1.1.2.e for Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20137E2951997-03-24024 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 125 & 119 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,respectively ML20137B4371997-03-20020 March 1997 SER Accepting Request for Relief for 120-month Update of Facility Inservice Insp & Inservice Testing Programs & Code Addition & Addenda of Asme/Ansi Parts 6 & 10 ML20135E4811997-03-0404 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Implementation of 10CFR50.55a Requirements Related to Repair & Replacement Activities for Containment at Plant ML20056H1341993-08-23023 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 921217 Response to NRC 920917 SE Re Inservice Testing Program Relief Request ML20062D7001990-11-0909 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 881123 & 900917 Responses to Generic Ltr 88-11, NRC Position on Radiation Embrittlement of Reactor Vessel Matls & Its Effect on Plant Operations. Submittals Acceptable.Beltline Welds Discussed ML20245A8601989-06-13013 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831104 & 850422 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.3, Reactor Trip Sys Reliability for All Domestic Operating Reactors ML20195D5391988-10-31031 October 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting ATWS Rule,10CFR50.62 ML20154C9651988-05-12012 May 1988 Safety Evaluation Re Flaw Indications in Reactor Pressure Vessel ML20147E2621987-11-16016 November 1987 Corrected Page 2 of Safety Evaluation Re Amends 74 & 66 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8,respectively,deleting Ref to Quarterly Surveillance Testing on Staggered Test Basis ML20235K4441987-07-0808 July 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Granting Licensee Relief from Volumetric Exam of Steam Generator Primary Side Noozles Inside Radiused Sections ML20212E2241987-02-27027 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 831104 Response to Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28 Re on-line Functional Testing of Reactor Trip Sys,Including Independent Testing of Diverse Trip Features of Reactor Trip Breakers ML20212F5101987-01-0707 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1), Equipment Classification (Reactor Trip Sys Components) ML20211D5341987-01-0707 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Rev 1 to EGG-EA-6794, Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97,Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Licensee Submittals.Response Acceptable ML20207C2671986-12-15015 December 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2) & Item 2.2.2 Re Vendor Interface Programs for Reactor Trip Sys & All Other Site safety- Related Components ML20214Q1891986-11-17017 November 1986 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief Re Inservice Evaluation Criteria for Disposition of Linear Indication in Reactor Coolant pipe-to-safe End Weld on Cold Leg Pipe of Loop C ML20211H9811986-06-19019 June 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Request for Relief from Inservice Testing/Insp Requirements Re pressure-retaining Valve Body Welds & Internal Pressure Boundary Surfaces of Valves Exceeding 4 Inches Nominal Pipe Size ML20198C7851986-05-16016 May 1986 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Util Pressurized Thermal Shock Screening Criteria for Reactor Pressure Vessels Complies w/10CFR50.61 ML20140C9901986-03-19019 March 1986 Suppl 1 to Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 851114 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 3.2.2 Re Test & Maint Procedures ML20136H6821985-12-27027 December 1985 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from Certain Inservice Testing/Insp Requirements Re Reactor Vessel Flange Ligaments,Reactor Coolant Pump Casing Internal Surfaces & Flange Bolts ML20136C4251985-11-12012 November 1985 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 831104 & 850215 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3 Re post-maint Testing Requirements in Existing Tech Specs for Reactor Trip Sys Components ML20209J1941985-10-24024 October 1985 SER Accepting Licensee 831104 & 850422 Responses to Items 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28 Concerning Preventative Maint Program & Trending Parameters for DS-416 Type Reactor Trip Breakers,Respectively ML20135H3891985-09-12012 September 1985 Safety Evaluation Re Compliance W/License Condition 2.C.(12)(b),requiring Provisions to Assure That safety-grade Backup Means of RCS Depressurization Meets Requirements of Rev 1 to Branch Technical Position Rsb 5-1.Addl Info Needed ML20209G9691985-09-10010 September 1985 Safety Evaluation Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2, 3.2.1,3.2.2,4.1 & 4.5.1.Addl Info Required for Item 3.2.2 Re Check of Vendor & Engineering Recommendations for Testing & Maint ML20127N3131985-06-12012 June 1985 SER Re Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2, Post-Trip Review (Data & Info Capability). Licensee post-trip Review Data & Info Capabilities Acceptable ML20129D5451985-05-21021 May 1985 SER Re Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1 Re post-trip Review Program & Procedures.Program & Procedures Acceptable Subj to Implementation of Listed Recommendations 1999-08-06
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217P0761999-10-0606 October 1999 Non-proprietary, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217G0361999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20212E7451999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Hcgs,Unit 1.With Summary of Changes,Tests & Experiments Implemented During Aug 1999.With ML20216E4941999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Jmfnp.With ML20210T2161999-08-0606 August 1999 Draft SE Supporting Proposed Conversion of Current TS to ITS for Plant ML20211B2011999-08-0404 August 1999 Informs Commission About Results of NRC Staff Review of Kaowool Fire Barriers at Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 & Staff Plans to Address Technical Issues with Kaowool & FP-60 Barriers ML20210R6031999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196J3791999-06-30030 June 1999 Safety Evaluation of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs. Rept Acceptable ML20209G0661999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With L-99-267, Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With L-99-023, Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Jfnp Units 1 & 2. with1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Jfnp Units 1 & 2. with ML20206G7471999-05-0404 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Corrective Actions Taken by SNC to Ensure That Valves Perform Intended Safety Functions & Concluding That SNC Adequately Addressed Requested Actions in GL 95-07 L-99-020, Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206C9461999-04-30030 April 1999 1:Final Cycle 16 Freespan ODSCC Operational Assessment L-99-161, Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205N0961999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20204D7271999-03-15015 March 1999 ISI Refueling 15,Interval 2,Period 3,Outage 3 for Jm Farley Nuclear Generating Plant,Unit 1 ML20207M6421999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20203A2651999-01-31031 January 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jan 1999 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20199D8611999-01-12012 January 1999 SER Accepting Relief Request for Inservice Insp Program for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20199E6591998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20206C8081998-12-31031 December 1998 Alabama Power 1998 Annual Rept ML20198K4091998-12-18018 December 1998 COLR for Jm Farley,Unit 1 Cycle 16 ML20198B2561998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20195E2281998-11-16016 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Relief Request for Second 10-year ISI Program Relief Request 56 for Plant,Unit 1 ML20195C9681998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20155E0271998-10-29029 October 1998 SER Approving & Denying in Part Inservice Testing Program Relief Requests for Plant.Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-3 & Q2P16-RR-V Denied Since Requests Do Not Meet Size Requirement of GL 89-04 ML20154B6121998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Second 10-year ISI Requests for Relief RR-13 & RR-49 Through RR-55 for Jm Farley NPP Unit 1 ML20151V8341998-09-30030 September 1998 Non-proprietary Rev 2 to NSA-SSO-96-525, Jm Farley Nuclear Plant Safety Analysis IR Neutron Flux Reactor Trip Setpoint Change ML20154H6001998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20154H0121998-09-30030 September 1998 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Farley Nuclear Plant IPEEE (Seismic Portion) ML20197C8991998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2.With ML20237C5471998-08-20020 August 1998 Suppl to SE Re Amends 137 & 129 to Licenses NPF-2 & NPF-8, Respectively.Se Being Supplemented to Incorporate Clarifications/Changes & Revise Commitment for Insp of SG U-bends in Rows 1 & 2 for Unit 2 Only ML20236Y1121998-07-31031 July 1998 Voltage-Based Repair Criteria 90-Day Rept ML20237B1891998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20237A2181998-07-24024 July 1998 Jm Farley Unit 2 ISI Rept Interval 2,Period 3 Outage 1, Refueling Outage 12 ML20236U6141998-07-23023 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Use of Alternative Alloy 690 Welds (Inco 52 & 152) as Substitute for Other Weld Metal ML20236R8671998-07-0909 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Southern Nuclear Operating Co USI A-46 Implementation Program Has Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff SSER-2 on GIP-2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20236M5981998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20154H0461998-06-30030 June 1998 Technical Evaluation Rept on Review of Farley Nuclear Plant IPEEE Submittal on High Winds,Flood & Other External Events (Hfo) ML20248M3121998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20247F3631998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20217D2591998-04-21021 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Alternative Re Augmented Exam of Reactor Vessel Shell Welds for Plant ML20247E8851998-03-31031 March 1998 FNP Unit 2 Cycle 13 Colr ML20217H3191998-03-31031 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Plant Matl Surveillance Programs ML20216D5941998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1998 for Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20217D4081998-03-24024 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Maintain Calibration Info Required by ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ML20216H6731998-03-17017 March 1998 SER Accepting Quality Assurance Program Description Change for Joseph M Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20216J6851998-03-16016 March 1998 Revised Pages 58 & 59 to Fnp,Units 1 & 2,Power Uprate Project BOP Licensing Rept ML20216D9811998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1998 for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ . _ _ _ . _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _.- _.._ _._ __._ __.
g..%k y UNITED STATES s
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION !
o WASHINGTON, D.C. tam 4e01
%,, o ne** !
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NbCL FAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENrmaENT NO.132 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-2 !
AND AMENDMENT NO.124 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-8 !
SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING COMPANY. INC.. ET AL.
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCl FAR PLANT. UNITS 1 AND 2 POCKET NOS. 50-348 AND 50 364 >
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated September 17,1997, the Southem Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (Southom Nuclear), et al., submitted an amendment request to modify the Joseph M. Feriey Nuclear :
Plant, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications (TSs). The roquested changes would revise TS 3/4.4.g, " Specific Activity," to reduce both the maximum instantaneous and the 48-hour values of dose equivalent "'I (iodine 131) in the reactor coolant. Southem Nuclear proposed to reduce these values because of the determination of an increase in the allowable primary-to-secondary leakage associated with a main steamline break (MSLB) accident. This increase was from a previously approved value of ig gallons per minute (gpm) (density corrected to 13.5 gpm) for Unit 1 and 11.4 gpm (not density corrected) for Unit 2 to a density corrected value ,
of 23.8 gpm for both,
2.0 BACKGROUND
in Amendment No.128 to the Unit 1 TSs, the 48-hour specific activity level of dose equivalent
"'I was changed to 0.3 microcurie / gram (pCl/g) from the previously appros ad va'ue of 0.5 pCilg. In addition, Table 4.4-4 was changed to require sampling of "'t, '"I, and '"i overy 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> when the specific activity level of primary coolant exceeded 0.3 pCilg. Figure 3,4-1 was changed to limit the maximum instantaneous activity level of dose equivalent "'l at rated thermal power levels of 80% or greater to 18 pCilg.
In Amerx mont No.106 to the Unit 2 TSs, the 48-hour specific activity level of dose equivalent
"'l was changed to 0.5 pCL/g from the previously approved value of 1.0 pCL/g. In addition, Table 4.4-4 was changed to require sampling of "'l, '"I, and '"I every 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> when the -
specific activity level of primary coolant exceeds 0.5 pCilg. Figure 3.4-1 was changed to limit -
the maximum instantaneous activity level of dose equivalent "'l at rated thermal power levels of 80% or greater to 30 pCilg. This was a decrease from the previous value of 60 pCilg. The Bases section of the TS was also changed to reflect the new value of 0.5 pCL/g.
F ADb o 4e '
PDR
. 4 . i i
2-A letter dated July 30,1907, from the Nuclear Energy institute to the industry indicated that a '
licensee had determined that some alle-allowable MSLB steam generator leak rates and the end of cycle (EOC) MSLB leak rates were incompatible because these values had not compensated for density differences. When this issue was reviewed for Farley Unit 1, it was determined that, for Amendment No.128, the approved 19 gpm leak rate actually corresponded to a 13.5 gpm leak rate when compensated for density. The results of the spring 1997 inspection of the Unit 1 steam generators indicated that the maximum projected EOC leak rate for the current operating cycle would be 15.7 gpm, which exceeded the projected EOC leakage
- of 13.7 gpm approved in Amendment No.128. The licensee projected the 13.7 gpm leak rate l would be exceeded 310 effective full power days into the present operating cycle. As of September 12,1997, Unit 1 was 100 days into the cycle.
- During this same spring 1997 steam generator inspection, a 13.7 volt indication was discovered in the 1C steam generator at the first tube suppori plate. This was considered to be a significant finding with respect to the existing data base for altomate repair criteria at the tube support plate. In-situ testing of the tube revealed no leakage at the MSLB differential pressure.
However, the tube was subsequently pulled, tested, and destructively examined. The MSLB 4 leakage for this intersection was determined to be 0.72 gpm. When this data is added to the currently approved voltage versus burst correlation and the voltage versus MSLB leakage correlation, there is a significant impact on the projected calculated EOC leakage. The new EOC calculated leakage was determined to be 20.4 gpm and the present condition of the Unit 1 ;
steam generators is such that the approved leakage in Amendment No.128 is exceeded. '
Consequently, the licensee placed an administration limit on the 48-hour TS value of dose equivalent
in a letter dated September 17,1997, Southem Nuclear submitted an amendment request that proposed to modify TS 3/4.4.9, " Specific Activity," for both Units 1 and 2. In this letter, ,
Southem Nuclear proposed to reduce the 48-hour TS value of dose equivalent *l from O.3 pCi/g to 0.15 pCilg and the maximum instantaneous value in the 804100% power range r from 18 pCl/g to 9 pCL/g. The maximum instantaneous values for power levels less than 80%
would also be reduced in Figure 3/41. Associated with these reductions in allowable values of dose equivalent *l in primary coolant was a proposed increase in the allowable primary to-secondary leakage rate to 23.8 gpm.
Assenament of Radiological Consequences The staff assessed the radiological dose consequences of an MSLB accident, which incorporates a density corrected 23.8 gpm primary-to-secondary leak. Two cases were evaluated. The first involved the accident initiated spike case, which is presumed to occur at the proposed 48-hour TS value of dose equivalent *l in primary coolant,0.15 pCilg. The second case involved the preexisting spike case, which is presumed to occur at the maximum instantaneous value of dose equivalent *l for 80% power or greater,9 pCl/g. In botil cases, the secondary coolant activity level of dose equivalent *l was 0.1 pCilg. The staff independently calculated the doses resulting from a main steamline break accident using the ;
methodology associated with Standard Review Plan 15.1.5, Appendix A.
l
.. ~ ~ - ~-.,m_ ._..__., . _ , . .
i The staff calculated doses for individuals located offsite at the Exclusion Area Boundary and at the Low-Population Zone and onsite to the control room operato(. The perameters, which were '!
' utilized in the staffs assessment, are presented in Table 1 (attached). The dows calculated by
, the staff are presented in Table 2 (attached).
l
( ,
The staffs calculations showed that the thyroid doses would be within the regulatory guidelines established for utilization of interim plugging criteria. Consequently, the staff concluded that the licensee's proposed increase in the MSLB induced leakage to a density compensated 23.8 gpm :'
in conjunction with a reduction in the TS allowable values for the maximum instantaneous dose equivalent "'l and the 48-hour value for dose equivalent "'l would be acceptable. Therefore, the proposed change to allow a total primary-to secondary leakage rate of 23.8 gpm for an - !
MSLB is acceptable.
3.0 STATE CONSULTATION
in accordance with the Commission's regulations, the State of Alabama official was notifed of the proposed issuance of the amendments. The State official had no comments.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendments change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and change surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (62 FR 49998 dated September 24, igg 7). Accordingly, the
- amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(g). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
5.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Attachment:
Tables 1 and 2 Principal Contributor: J. Hayes Date: October 29, 1997
TABLE 1 ,
INPUT PARAMETERS FOR FARLEY UNITS 1 AND 2 EVALUATION OF MAIN STEAMLINE BREAK ACCIDENT
- 1. Primary coolant concentration of 9 pCilg of dose equivalent "'t.
Preexistina Soike Value (uCl/a)
^
"'I = 6.95 "21 = 2.49
"'I = 11.1 -
"'I = 1.68 "Si = 6.1 i
- 2. Volume of primary coolant and secondary coolant.
i Primary Coolant Volume (ft') 10,710 Primary Coolant Temperature ('F) 578 Secondary Coolant Steam Volume (ft') 3,742 Secondary Coolant Liquid Volume (ft') 2,016 Secondary Coolant Steam Temperature ('F) 518 Secondary Coolant Feedwater Temperature ('F) 437
- 3. TS limits for DE "'I in the primary and secondary coolant.
Primary Coolant DE "'l concentration (pCl/g) 0.15 Secondary Coolant DE "'l concentration (pCl/g) 0.1
- 4. TS value for the primary to-secondary leak rate.
Primary to secondary leak rate, any SG (gpd) 140 Primary to secondary leak rate, total all SGs (gpd) 420
- 5. Maximum primary to secondary leak rate to the faulted and intact SGs.
Faulted SG (gpm) 23.8 Intact SGs (gpm/SG) 0.1
- 6. lodine Partition Factor Faulted SG 1 Intact SG 0.1 Primary to Secondary Leakage 1.0
- 7. Steam Released to the environment Faulted SG (Ib/2 hours) 96,200 plus primary-to-secondary leakage intact SCs (Ib/2 hours) 479,000 plus primary to-secondary leakage Attachment i
, as o 2-P
- 8. Letdown Flow Rate (gpm) 60
- 9. Release Rate for 0.15 pCl/g of Dose Equivalent *l Gbt
- 10. Atmospheric Dispersion Factors (sec/m')
EAB (0-2 hours) 6.4 x 104 LPZ (0-8 houm) 1.0 x 10d Control Room (0-8 hours) 3.3 x 104
- 11. Control Room Volume (ft') 69,000 Normal Makeup Flow (cfm) 1,350 Emergency Makeup Flow (cfm) 270 Makeup Finer efficiency (%) 99 Unfinered Inleakage (cfm) 10 Recirculation Finer Flow Rate (cfm) 2,700 Recirculation Finer Ef5ciency (%) 95
, .w o TABLE 2 l
MAIN STEAMLINE BREAK THYROID DOSE ASSESSMENT FOR FARLEY UNITS 1 AND 2 Preexistina Soike Exclusion Low. Control Room Area Population i Boundarv ZDat Calculated doses (rem) 23.8 13.2 2.0 Regulatory Guidelines (rem) 30 30 30 Accident initiated Soike Exclusior. Low. Control Roorm Area Population l Boundary ZDDR Calculated doses (rem) 13.2 29.8 4A Regul& tory Guidelines (rem) 30 30 30 t
i Attachment 2
_