ML20198K869
| ML20198K869 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/28/1998 |
| From: | Fields J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Woods B SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. (FORMERLY |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-02-95-003, CON-NRC-2-95-3 NUDOCS 9812310181 | |
| Download: ML20198K869 (4) | |
Text
-. - _ - - - . - . . _ - - - .-
- ' ^
'bcD-m -
p t. UNITED STATE 8 s* j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. ensam mang
'.3
\*****[2
- , November 27,1998 l
Science Applications International Corporation l
Energy ano Environmental Group I Attn: Mr. Benny Woods Contract Representative 11251 Roger Bacon Drive Reston, VA 22090
SUBJECT:
TASK ORDER NO 11, MODIFICATION NO. 4 UNDER CONTRACT NO. l NRC-02-95-003 I
Dear Mr. Woods:
In accordance with the task order procedures of the subject contract, this letter definitizes Modification No. 4 to Task Order No.11 which (1) increases the task order ceiling amount by l
$14,994.00 from $169,213.00 to $184,207.00 for performance of services as described in the attached Statement of Work. As a result, the task order ceiling amount is $184,207.00, of which the sum $169,776.00 represents the reimbursable costs and the sum $14,431.00 represents the '
fixed fee.
A summary of obligations for the subject task .ader, from award date through the date of this i action, is given below:
Total FY96 Obligation Amount: $79,079.00 Cumulative Total of NRC Obligations: $79,079.00 1
This modification does not obligate any FY98 funds.
The issuance of this modification does not amend any other terms or conditions of.the subject task order. i The following individuals are considered essential to the successful performance of the work hereunder: Roy Karimi, Steve Mirsky, and John Stokely Please indicate your acceptance of this task order by having an official authorized to bind your organization execute three copies of this document in the space provided and return two copies to the Contracting Officer. You should retain the third copy for your records. i 1 ;
\
9812310181 PDR 981220 '
CONTR V NRC-02-95-003 pon A)y l
/ \
i 3100"l3 1
1 l
! ~
2
. ,, ' ~ Mod. No t, TO No.11 NRC-02-95 13 s .
l If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me on (301) 415-6564.
Sincerely, i
A. Fields, Contracting Officer ontract Management Branch No. 2 Division of Contracts and Property Management Office of Administration
Enclosure:
As stated ACCEPTED:
NAME
/kW" '
TimothyW.Bendt ContractRepresentative !
TITLE 1
(% h WfiY DATE l
i1
' l 5.~~
3 CONTRACT NO. NRC-02-95-003 WORK UNDER TASK ORDER 11 - ,
Title:
Technical Assistance in the Review of VSC-24 Case. Revi Objective f
The objective of this task is to review criticalit d unanticipated the rulemaking process. Significant operational experience has bl uncovere t be problems such as seal weld cracks in loaded cas l ti Section 5(a) of the statement of work states hdthatgeneration technical assist considering the impact of recent issues associated with the VSC-24 (e.g., y ro 5
and coatings, closure weld problems in the VSC-2 Work Required SAIC has reviewed the VSC-24 cask in areasi such b ated aswater structural eva surveillance requirements. continement barriers. etc. Accidents dible'in theresuhing n intrusion into the MSB after thefhdMSB ign basis is in the welded i d accident scenario (i.e., water in-leakage b d into the M in the VSC-24 have the potential to affect the integrity of the MSB co Therefore, in order to assess the safety significance f the VSC-24 of this ope analysis and hydrogen generation analysis shall i be i performed The contractor by the c with the conditions of correctly loaded spent fuel andhunborated water ntrus o shall perform an analysis in order to provide a rough d i s the potential estimate of how muc r i
would cause criticality or hydrogen generation (i of the accident that may lead to consequences.
i ldd Operational experience with independent il spent the inletfuel mesh storage d
an event in which 96% of the kair finlets were blo ll air inlets would j
evaluated in the VSC-24 SER. The evaluation dshows that full bloc age o aB result in the concrete cask meeting its temperaturebelimits taken to incorrect 1 to any2 ays.
requires that the air inlets be checked for blockage daily.
k ll air inlets, may be must l thereAction actual blockage. Ilowever,in the event of a small Hoodt which blocas a hall provide ;
no action available to mitigate the situation. Based on the above, the c thermal analysis of the effects of full blockage of the air inlets y i
of the VSC-24 components.
)
l
Les el ot Effort 3 --
The estimated level of effort to perform the aikEe analyses is approximately 150 hrs.
Period of Performance The period of performance for this task commenced on February 20,1996 and expire on December 31.1999; but the work specified above shall be completed by October 31,1998.
i l
)
I 1
<