ML20198K339

Forwards NRR Responses to Doi Questionaire on Federal Archeological Activities,For Use in Preparing NRC Response to Doi Survey

ML20198K339
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/09/1998
From:	Essig T NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:	Virgilio R NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
References
NUDOCS 9801140378
Download: ML20198K339 (6)

Text

-_

January 9. 1998 D

MEMORANDUM TO: Rosetta Virgilio, Federal Liaison Office of State Programs FROM:

Thomas H. Essig, Acting Chief Frank M. Akstulewicz for/

Generic lesues and Environmental Projects Branch Division of Reactor Program Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR (dol) QUESTIONNAIRE ON FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES The DOI requested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) complete the Federal Archeology Program Survey. Attached for yc,ur use in preparing the NRC response to the DOI Federal Archeology Program Survey is the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's (NRR) response to the DOI survey. The attached response includes the completed Archeological Activities questionnaire answer sheet provided by DOI.

The survey questions specifically focused on archeologicolinvestigations, protection, management, recovery, and collections management activities carried out under Federal authority. The licensees of two plants perintmed some archeological activity with respect to question C4. Their responses aro detailed in the attachment to the answer sheet.

Attachment:

As stated CONTACT: Alex McKeigney, PGEB/NRR (301) 415 1221 i

DOCUMENT NAME: G:%FMWRCH2.

GREEN TICKET 970661 OFFICE PGEB:DRPM,

(A)SC:PGEB:DRPM (A)BC:PGE/:D$PM NAME AMcKeigneyS[

MMalley&W TEssig /4 AI/

DATE 1/ 7/98-1/E /98 ilQ/98

//

I

\\

ll ll lllllll l[lIl yxpOE pi py 1140g78 g o9 gg g' NRC FRf CENTER CDPV e)

(** nog g~

4 UNITSO STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

=

WA&MINGToN, D.C. sese6 eeM l

January 9.-1998 i

MEMORANDUM TO: Rosetta Virgilio, Federal Liaison Omco of State Programs FROM:

Thomas H. Essig, Acting Ch Generic issues and Environmenta l

Projects Branch i

Division of Reactor Program Management i

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR (Dol) QUESTIONNAIRE ON FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES I

The dol requested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) complete the Federal j

Archeology Program Survey. Attached for your use in preparing the NRC response to the DOI Federal Archeology Program Survey is the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation's (NRR) response to the Dol survey. The attached response includes the completed Archeological Activities questionnaire answer sheet provided by DOI.

The survey questions specifically focused on archeological investigations, protection, management, recovery, and collections management activities carried out under Federal authority. The licensees of two plants performed some archeological activity with respect to question C4. Their responses are detailed in the attachment to the answer sheet.

Attachment:

As stated CONTACT:- Alex McKeigney, PGEB/NRR (301)415 1221

(

k DISTRIBUTION: GT970661 Dated January 9.1998 Central File (whncoming) (GT970661)

PUBUC (wAncoming)(GT970061)

NRR Malltoom (w/ incoming) (GT970661)

PGEB R/F (wnncoming)(GT970661)

1. Callan AThadani HThompson PNorry JBlaha SBums,OGC SCollins FMiraglia RZimmerman JRoe EAdensam DMatthews TEssig AMcKeigney MMalloy CCraig

' MThadani MBoyle (email)

MClark (GT 970661)

OGC OPA OCA

.t.;0100

i l

f ATTACHMENT TO ANSWER SHEET l

C4 Wolf Creek: The licensee recently obtained a permM from the Corps of Engineers to dredge the ultimate heat sink. Prior to receiving the permN, the archeologicalimpact of the project was reviewed by the Konson Stata Historical Society, Cultural Resources Division, and found to incur no adverse impact. Additionally, the licensee is planning to construct a wetlands dike upstream of the UHS, To assess the impact of the project, the Konson State Historical Society reviewed the proposed activity and recoi. mended an archeological review, After review of additional information by the historical society, they concluded that the proposed activity was acceptable and would not impact archeological resources.

Diablo. Canyon: The licensee performed two database literature searches and field studies to assess and confirm that no archeological resources were in two areas of proposed repair work.

The first proposed work area was along an already existing access road that was damaged i

during a storm. The area had been previously surveyed and added to a database which showed no archeological resources in the vicinity of the proposed work area. The information was confirmed by the subsequent field study. Therefore, the repair work was determined not to impact archeological resources. The second database search was performed in September 1997 to determine if archeological resources were present in the vicinity of proposed mudslide repair work on a second road. The database search revealed that the area had been previously surveyed and contained two archeological sites. A follow up field study to confirm the presence of the two sites was performed in November 1997. Currently, the licensee is considering possible altomatives on how to perform the necessary repairs without impacting either of the two sites.

f Attachment

t THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S REPORT TO CONGRESS Agency NRR Innut Office ON FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES Cornact GSA Control Number: 0236 DOI-AN Phone ANSWER SHEET: Questiormaire on Fiscal Year 1997 Activities Quandratin Data ii K5 Anached Material l

Cl 0

12 K6 Nwrese P ; --_,

(check if presenet AI -

C2 0

13 K7 B1 B~

C3 1

14 K8 C4 D6 _

Di o

15 K9$

E4 _

F5 D2$

0 16 K10 01 G2 _

D3 0

17 Kil $

G3 H5 _

t D4 0

18 K12 $

H6 H 0_

i D5 0

19 K13 $

ii1 I9 -

EI

,0 Jl K14 $

g_

K!8 E2 $

0 J2 K15$

KI9 E3 0

J3 K16 $

LOOT form (s) p gg y4 included:EA L.

Computer disk accompanying:.Q._

F3 NA J6 p4 -

gg y7 Photographs i

accomparri ng:.0_

HI NA j8 ~

Other materials accompanyingt H2 NA Kl H3 NA K2 H4 NA K3 Land-inanagias agerwies K4 only, $cctkms 1 K

i f

i i

EDO Principal Correspondence Control

\\;

FRON:

DU2: 03/25/98 EDO CONTROL: G970661 DOC DT 09/10/97 FINAL REPLY

/l,,,g Frcncis P. McManamon fr U.S. Department of the Interior y

TO:

Callan, EDO FJR SIGNATURE OF

• • GRN CRC NO:

Bangart, SP DESC ROUTING:

COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE REPORT TO Callan CONGRESS ON THE FEDERAL ARCHEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES Thadani Thompson Norry Blaha Bura-DATE: 09/15/97 6 111ns, NR D _

rug,..

44u,nMES ASSIGNED TO:

CONTACT:

SP Bangart 1:

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS OR REMARKS R0f. GT96740.

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE P.O. Ike 37137 wmMngton. D C 200ll 7127 T63Y(2375)

Mr. L. Joseph Callan Executive Director for Operatkms Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Callan:

We request your participation In reporting to Congress on the Federal archeological activities that your agency conducted in fiscal year 1997 by completing and submitting the enclosed qaestionnaire. The Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA; 16 U.S.C. 470ll mm) and the Archeological and Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 469469c) requlre the Secretary of the Interior to repott to Congress on the Federal archeology program. Information from past reports has provided important guidance for Congrenlonal actions, for example, in pryaring the 1988 amendments to ARPA which have enhanced the law enforcement provisions of the statute substantially.

• Die Departmental Consultmg Archeologist and the Archeology and Ethnography Program within the National Park Service prepare the Secretary's report based on responses to the enclosed questionnaire.

We thank you for your cooperation in preparing and providing the information requested. Without your attention and careful work, our goal of providing a detailed amt useful repart could not be met. You will find this report helpful in carrying out archeological activities for your agency, in assisting with the development of your archeological program, and as a resource for information exchange with others who may be conducting similar work, in order for ur to report fully on the looting of archeological sites, we also would appreciate receiving completed LOOT records about current prosecutions of archeological looting violations that are not already included in the LOOT database maintained by the National Park Service and used by law enforcement officials throughout the United States. For information on the 1.00T daiabase, contact Mr.

David Tarler, Archeology and Ethnography Program, National Park Service (202) 3431108.

Please return the completed questionnaire to the Departmental Consulting Archeologist by March 31, 19M. If there are questions about the questionnaire, please contact Mr. Daniel Haas of my staff at (202) 3431058; FAX (202) 5231547; E-mail: dan,,,haas@nps. gov. On behalf of the Secretary of the Interior and Congress, thank you for your continuing panicipation in this important program review and reporting effort.

Sincerely, h&% =

r Francis P. hicManamon, Ph.D.

Depanmental Consulting Archeologist Enclosure 97 f

0.9JYM po g lci, )

EDO +- G970661 l

1i m

I i

THE SBCRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S REPORT TO CONGRESS

{

ON FEDERAI ARCHEOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES

(

OSA Control Number: 0236 DOI AN j

CMde en Flacal Year 1997 Activities 4

1hs Secremry't Aaport to Cogros on Federal arssology (SRC) prevides agency-by apacy and government-wide sunmary data on archeological programs and projects. 1he report provides flannetal and other j

pandedve informados, project highlights, discussions of key planning and policy issues, a descripdon of l

known and peq.ced U.s. armeulogical sins and associand anitaca and records, and an anmal senmary of program activities. The SRC la a broadly based source ofleformation on the Federal archeology program.

j It is und by f-,-1 and apncies in evalundng their archeological activities, as well as by Congress, te archeological profession, the pneral cultural resource management and historic preservadon conununides, and 6e interseted public.

2 The Secretary of hs Interior is charged with providing guidance and coordinadon for Federal archeology and for preparing a report to Conyes on Pederal archeological activities. The Nadonal Historic Preservation Act i

(NHPA), as amended, autorians the Secremry to guide and coordinate Federal historic preservadon activities, including Federal ardeological acdvides.1he Secretary la required to report to Congres on various Pederal l

archeological activides by Seedon $(c) of the Archeological and Historic Preservadon Act (AHPA) and by j

Secelons 10(c) and 13 of he Ar&seological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), as amended. ARPA Uniform Reguladon i.19 requires Federal land managers to provide archeolorf program information to the Secretary of the laterior, upon request of the Secretary, for this report. The report is accomplished for the Secretary ty he Departmental Canaldng Archeologist (DCA) with he support of the Archeological Assisance Program vethin the Nadonal Park Service.

This quesdonnaire is to be completed by all agencies with responsibilldes in the Federal archeology program.

The queadonnaire responses are a critical element in the Secretary's report.

J The quesdonnaire is intended to be used with only ndnor modificadons through FY97. Each quesdon refers to activities conducted in FY97 (October 1,1996 through September 30,1997).

Instructions for the FY97 Federal Archeo!asy Program Questionnaire The s arying missions of U.S. Federal agencies influence the nature of archeological activides engaged in by each of them. For example, not all agencies issue archeologhi permits. All agencies that undertake, contract for, or require of other parties archeological invesdgatiom $wid respond to questions in Seedons A through H. Regulatory and developmental agencies who issue permits and licenses for projects are -

Included in this category. Sections 1 K apply only to agencies that also manage Federal or Indian land. It is understood that precies data are not always available and that in some cases knowledgeable estimates must be made. -

Federal agencies that do not own and manage large acroases may provide funding for development on Federal and Indian lands or may regulate activides on Federal or Indian land. These regalatory agencies ohen lasue permits or licennes for projects that cross Federal and hullan lands managed t y other Federal agencies.1he term

• land use applicant" used throughout this questionnaire always refers to non Federal t

entides who are conducting archeological activities in response to permit or financial support requirements.

Thus, a regulatory agency should not consider itself a " land use applicant

• when responding to these I~

+

+

r

+

,,,+rr9--,

r w w - v w w y*ww+ww ww, -.

v+, e ov~ o w m.,,e. w ev -e w r-e-e m e m... w -* + w w w e +.- -

w

.+-o.

m

-w.~.--.

t

- i l

9*sdons e

l Note est these quesdons gecifically apply to archeological invesdsadon, protection, management, recovery, and aalladam management acivides carried out under Federal authority, and do not pertain to j

all cultural resource mansassment sedvities. In the event est a department / agency takes the posidon that j

the endre ;M - '4 is nor applicable, return the uncompleted quesdonnaire with a cover letter of explanadon.

l J

In compiedag the M

%, use the attached Answer Sheet. Fill out each line of the Ansur Sheet j

wie numerloal das called for, or with abe followlsg abbrevisdons ONLY:

t i

NA (Not Applicable), 'Inis tona should only be used to indicate that abs agency has no responsibility for l

tis activity. If a action or a question has & :?==lquesdons, All in each line wi6 NA.

ND (No Data le Report). This term thould be used to indicate that although the question applies, there are no data to report. If dem are not available for some oiber reason, use ND insmad of a quantitative answer and indicate the reason (s) in the naaradve response request for the relevant needsn.

3 (Zero/Nothing).1his response should only be used to indicate the known absence of a quantity. Zero should not be used to indicate a lack of data.

Dollar Amounts ($): Round all dollar amounts to the nearest thousand, and specify if amounts are groes l

esimates, i

i Narrative Raponses: Provide amwors to the narradve quesdons on the disk in either Word Perfect 5.1, Word Perfect 6.0, or Word 6.0, Respond on the Ansur Sheet for all narrative questions with either a NA, ND, or check if a narrative is attacht d. Responses to the narradve questions are an excellent source ofinformation and have added greatly to the content of past reports. Among the narrative queadons, Assney Highlights provides an opportunity for agencies to highlight their archeological activides. Topics discussed might include specific archeological surveys and excavadons; public awareness activides (publicados, reports, brochures, exhibits, lectures, Alms, videos, awards, educadon programs, site protection programs, etc.); interagency, intergovernmental, and laternadonal cooperation; or any other i

activides that reflect participadon in Federal archeological activities.

j Department and Agency Names and Abbreviations: The first dme any department or agency name is used in a narrative response, spell it out followed by the abbreviation (e.g., Aureau efland Management (BLAf)), using only the abbreviadon in subsequent references.

Subsnission Fermai Provide a composis agency response to the quesdonnaire on the Answer Sheet, summarizing information collected from regions, districts, divisions, etc. Narrative responses can be submitted by separate regional, state, division, etc. ~ofnoe. Please compile narrative responses and the answer sheet on disk in either Word Perfect 5.1, Word Perfect 6.0, or Word 6.0,, if at all possible.

11 i

,.2..<

+

-w-o - U E,

r.w-.,,-,,--m,w,m..-~,m-

..n--

y

,c.,,

-s,3-g,.w i.,w...m

-m4.-rwww

.w,m,..c,,w,,,,m

.,,-v,eww-<ce,.

, c.e n,,, -

Addkl mal Informatlan and Material Requested Enor clearin@m-natat Complete the attached LOOT form (OMB No.1024411l) for each archeological resource proescudon and citadon sported within your agency in FY97.

Elstograghs: Please submit black and white photographs (at team 5' x 7') depledng Federal archeological acdvides. Although black and whits photographs are preferred, color photographs or alldes will be accepted.

On the back of each photograph print the appropriate capdon (idendfy people by name and poeldon) and photographic creditline.

Due Dates and Assistance lhe headquarters oNice of endi agency should reten the composite, answer sheet and narradve sheets, completed LOOT form (s), photogreg*A, and any oqher supplemental material to the Nadonal Park Servloe, Departmental Consuldng Archeologist (2275),1849 C. Street, Washington, DC 2M40, by March 31,1998.

Quesdons abowl this titre should be directed to Daniel Haas, USDI NPS Nadonal Center for Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnorddp, Archeology and Ethnography Program, at 202 3431058, Fax: 202-

$231547; E mail: dan _hassenps. gov.

Attachments: Answer Sheet, LOOT Form, 1

t til

i FYF7 Athologiool Activkies Agoney orrie.

1 Section A. Agency Archeology Program FY97 Highlights i

Al (mpene den). Provide highlights of outstanding arsoologim! projects and programs that could be included in the FY97 report. Toples discussed might include specific arsoological surveys; dets recovery projects; public educadon and outreach sedvides; archeological colleedons management, curadon, or conservadon effons; interagency, latergovernmental, and international cooperadon; or other relevant activities.

1 Section B. Archeological Public Education and Outreach I

11ms emetbn provides narrative Infonnation on edency prograrre and assonplashments in Gw ama of publie eduention and swannees mgesding lieues of concern to the Federal anheology program, during FY97.

B1 (eeparwe them). Does the agency have archeological public education and outreach programs planned or underway? If so, describe these plans or programs.

B2 (wperse ehem: this queston I.

ked in n. pones to ARPA Semion 11 mquimnenu). Describe communicadon, cooperation,and exchange between agency and private individuals having archeological resources and data collected from Federal and Indian lands, and with professional archeologists outside of the agency. Identify when those activities involve archeological, historic, or other scientific associations.

l of il

PYF7 Aeohec4osical AethWe Aswy otroca Section C. Archeological Owylew and Planning Studies This esatkm pewides esa on overview and plesudng audies r"- by the agoney or agency conutetorf, of h land use appbeasta/psimmeentheennem and conte, during FY97.

Cl.

Number of overviews or literature /nup searches associated with general planning activides and resulting in a Ale letter, report, or other documentation conducted by the agency itself, or conducted for the agency by contractors t.nd cooperators and supported with agency funds.

C2.

Amount expended by agency for the studies counted in respense C1 (indude salary and benems, suppor1, and other costs)

C3.

Number of overviews or literature / map searches conducted by land use applicants /permittees/lleensees and not supported with agency fends C4 (enneau den). Prodde analysis, interpretation, and clarification of responses to the archeological overview and planning studies questions.

2 0f 11-

I i

I, l

j yy, & m. m. m

%y offee l

prel== D. Ardisoloslad Identineation and Evaluation investigations

- T.J aise ponen ilm. en inneassion.nd han, n.dia wd.nak.a t,y on s y w.eny.==. mas, w by land use ;;'ir:',-. '-'

h, W FYt7.

l Dt.

Nwnbar of Aeld andes to idendfy and evaluate archeological properdes conducted by 6s agency itself, or ar=hM for the agency by contractors and cooperators and supported wie agency funds.

D2.

Annat expended by agency for archeological idendAcadon and evaluadon sades Inndude salary and benents, support, and other costs)

D3.

Nanber of Seld s'.xiles to identify and evaluate archeological propordes conducted by land une applicants /permittees/ licensees and not supported with agency funds D4.

Number of acres by archeological identincadon and evalundon investigadons D5.

Total number of rWeal sites identined by idendAcadon and evaluadon studies D6 (mpuum elem). Provide analysis, interpretadon, and clarincadon of responses to questions about archeological idendAcadon and evaluadon studies.

f I

f a

b 0

4 4

3 of 11

.--e.,

vr a --

m

-r, m..

h t.

.pr-

+.,,,,

,,,.,.m,.,%..e,,

,..%-c[,,,,,,,%,.,.

,c.

-,,,-,wm.

_,y

,,mm.,

7

_m,..

P' FYM Andeologieel Aedvidu Aswwy Office 1

Section E. Archeological Data Recowy I

Tu seenan providee infonnehen on anhoological deu seeovery projeme r '~"- by the agency or a& wry somemon, or by land ues applients.'ir.9- 'tweneses, during FY97.

i El. Number of ardeological data recovery projecta conducted by the egency leelf, or conducted i

for the agency by contractors and cooperators and supported with agency Auds.

E2, Amount expended by agency for all at:heologial data recovery projects Onclude salary and benefits, support, and other costs)

E3. Number of archeological data recoven projects conducted by land use applicants /perminees/lleensees and not supported wN sgency funds E4 (wparou shon). Provide analysis, interpretation and clarification of responses to questions about -

archeological data recovery projects.

)

t 4 of il

L j

nw Ann.olos t Anive.

Apacy w

oltu t

Section F. Unanticipated Arf:":,;'-:e Discouries l

TW mection pmides ese on archec4osioni propalee discovmod wompetedly in FYp? subeequent to asency conf dion i

of the Nil."A Sedian 106 miew and songliarse process.

l Pl. Nanber of undertakings resulting in the discovery of unanticipated archeological resources incitdng bort undertakings conducted by the agency itself, or conducted for the agerey by contractors and cooperators and supported with agency funds.

8 F2, Amount expended by agency for unanticipated discoveries Onclude antary and benefits, support, ar:4 other costs) t F3. Number of unanticipated discoveries encountered by land use applicants / grantees /lleensees on projects not supported with agency funds F4. Number of unanticipated discovery situations in which the archeological resources were judged important enough for data collection to be conducted or for changes to be made in the undertaking design to avoid the discovered resources (loclude discoveries made by agency, contractor or cooperator working for agency and land une applicants /pernditees/ grantees /;this number should be less than or possibly equal to the sum of the reponsa to questions F1 and F3 [if t*, explain below in response F5]

F5 ( pews.t.*). Provide analysis, interpretation ard clarification of responses to questions about unanticipated archeological discoveries, 4

5 of 11

0

)

PTM Artheological Activkies Agency ottice Sutton G. ArcheologicalInformation Managestat Tide oeotion summarbes information managemas symems used by de esency for data on aseleolosical permks. ehe knePkas sollemawe, eleikms, and other archeological topies. If a single larger eymem is used for two or more of de arene covered hr pestiws 0103, then thoes questions may be eremered by a singte aeronse. If Ode is done, make an explick note of Om fact on v4 answer sheet. Also, if approprisse, note and summarise the other kinds of informataon included in e systan veed for any of the Oveswem.

01 (wperete ehem). Describe any computerized systems not reported in previous years that the agency is currendy using to record and monitor ARPA, Andquities Act, and/or other permits for archeological investigations and note 6e ongoing use of previously reported systems. Note the hardware and software used 1 for any systems mentioned.

G2 (aparam shem). Describe any computerized systems not reported in previous years that the agency is using to record and monitor archeological alte locations for inventory purposes and note the ongoing use of previously reported systems. Note the hardware and software used for any systems rr.endoned.

G3 (mpnewe ehem). Describe any computerized systems not reported in previous years that the agency is using to record and monlior archeologleal collections for management purposes aad note the ongoing use of previously reported systems. Note the hardware and softure used for any systems mentioned.

6 of 11

_._ _ _-_._.- __ __ ~ _. _ _. _. _ _ _ _ - - - _. _ _

I s

.?

s mr.e' +.;iset Aedvid.

Asenry _

l ofr,se

[

Sedlen H. AE' : ': ':d CWlans Management t

his emeden oevue Fedent sousadons snenseemesd nedvides undeneken by or for the esawy in FYt? es requbed by 36 CPR 79, the pwysme of e4dsh is to preserve sousadens or ;.-- 'lr i and histor6e meierial torneins, and esseelsted recorde sesovuod ineder the.'"'; " : Aet, AMPA, NHPA, or AkPA.

i 1

Hl.

Cubic feet (or los if approprise; explain dimenslen used here in response H6) of -

f stored material remains (artiface, samples) l

% H2.

Percentage of amount (cubic feet, lots) Identified in response H1 that has been catalogued I

i H3.

Number of linsar feet of records associated with stored archeological matedal remains H4.

Esdmated number of cubic feet / lots added to collecdons in FY97 HS (mpmene ehen). Describe in brief overview how the agency is meedng or plans to meet its curadon responsibilities under 36 CFR 79. Identify and briefly describe the curadon facilldes relied on by the agency j

in meedng is responalbilities. Also describe cataloging systems (e.g., file cards, electronic records) used in

{

each such facility.

6 H6 (esposeie show). Provide analysis, interpretation and clarificadon of the responses to the questions about i

archeological collections management.

THE REMAINDER OF 1HE QUES 110NNAIRE (Sections 1 K) IS TO BE COMPLETED BY AGENCIES

{

THAT MANAGE FEDERAL OR INDIAN LAND.

i 1

1 7 of 11 l

r I

s.

l0 FYM Aeohoologieel Aetivkies Aseacy.

Ofr.oe Section 1. AE' ':f:d Resource Base on Federal and Indian lands l

i i

This emike paida kneenias inforwanica abam #= *sied of whoonasleal rosswo** wkhia #= laads maansed by Fed==3 l

es.aein, and se quenay of knowledse abow een mowese gusenime 12 Is emil for the best poenible estimmies for ewaulative i

. estivkies threigh FYM; some of Onee sospwees may be the emme as thoes provided for the pmious year.

11. Total acres manapd On reponse lie below, brisny deastbe the ownership status and use l

tidds that apply for this asungs, and identify the source of information on the acrosse amount with publication chation if appropriate) i

12. Total acres inventorlod sufRcleody to identify all readily apparent archoological properdes present tiere 0.e., land invesdgated at an appropriate level of intensity to eliminate the i

need for further systematic inventory given current standards)

13. Tomi acres inventoried by less than full coverage 0.e., land investigated a. t ::':#Aly but i

pot intensively enough to ensure 100% inventory of archeological sites)

_14. Total number of known archeological properties on agency-managed land Any one e.C:':f:d property should be counted only once in responding to question set 1519.

13. Total number of archeological properties on agency managed lands listed on the Nadonal i

Register of Historic Places (NPHP)

16. Total number of archeological properties on agency-managed land formally determined eligible for the NRHP or considered eligible through documented consultadon with the State Historic Preservadon Ofncer (SHPO)

17. Total number of archeological properdes on agency managed land formally determined ineligible for the NRHP or through documented consultation with the SHPO

18. Total number of known archeological properdes on agency-managed land adequately evaluated, but not listed, considered, or forma;ly determined eligible for the NRHP 0.e.,

f!Iting responses, to neither questions 1517) l

19. Total number of known archeological properdes on agency-managed land not NRHP.

evaluated.

110 (=rume ehem) Provide analysis, interpretation and clarificadon of responses to questions about the Federal and Indian land archeological resource base, including the basis for estimadng responses.

111 (mienne etwet). Are nedons underway or planned to comply with ARPA Sec. W This requires Federal agencies to develop plans for surveying lands under their control t) determine the.tature and extent of their i

archeological resources, and to prepare a schedule for surveying lands that are likely to contain the most scientifically valuable archeological resources, if the ansur is yes, describe these actions and/or plans.

Section J. As' : ':24 Permitting i

S of il

• e h

I FY97 Archeological Activb Agency _

Office I

This esaka numerhee the rumber of whootogical permha or the frmguency of the use of ARPA Urdform Regulations 6

.5(b,c) authorky for whoological methh undensken on redual and Indian lands using various legal authorities during FYP7.

Explain any laconsistencies that may occur in your numerical responses to question J1 J8 (e.g., more permits denied [J5) than pennit applications received [J4]), in response J9.

11. Number of archeologicalinvestigation permits lasued or in effect pursuant to Federal agency policles, procedures, or guidelines for archeologleal activides authorized by ARPA, the Antiquities Act, or agency specific statutea J2. Number of permittees checked in the field, laboratory, or at their curation repository J3. Total number of Investigations tr 'un or underway, conducted by the agency or urder agreement for which no formal permits were issued, but which otherwise complied with ARPA conditions and standards as authorized by ARPA Uniform Regulations 5.5(b,c)

J4. Number of permit applications received J5. Number of permit applications denied J6. Number of permits suspended J7. Number of denied or suspended permits appealed

18. Number of notifications to Indian Tribes of proposed work that might harm or destroy sites having rellglous or cultural importarxe to a Tribe, as required by ARPA Urdform Regulation I

.') (in response J9, provide a brief description of any consultation and cooperation thht may have developed as a consequence of such notifications).

J9 (eeperse dwe). Provide ar.alysis, interpretation and clarification of responses to questions about archtological perndtting activities.

9 0f il

a 4

e W97 M ' ':;isel Activitsee AsetWy on.

Section K. Archeologicallaw Enforcement nie snake ammew6mse Pvv7 vioisinem, eimion, wiseu, w ", and eenvietions under various Fedwal auderities ses esad Miand winamipein mian etc '-; 'peuponia. Une se eu.ched toor term for repmsias W97 ardnetesiest emeura - - ' andonesses.

Kl. Total munbr.t of documented violadons (regardless of whether or not these resuled in a pressoudos or cintion) of ARPA, de Andspaldes Aa, Federal property laws, or other statutes proescdag ardeologictd properdes, reported on land managed by the agency (as defined in ARPA Sec. 6, a vlointion h any actual or attempted escavation, removal, damage to, ahoration, or defaesment of an ardsologimi property on Federal land without a permit issued er an esemption listed in ARPA Sec. 4)

K2. Total number of arrests K3. Total number of citadons (for every citation, attadi a completed LOOT form)

K4. Total number of prosecudons (for every prosecution, attach a completed LOOT form)

K5. Number of ml. demeanor convicdons under ARPA only K6. Number of felony convictions u.*r ARPA only K7 Number of snoorid or subsequent ARPA convictions (included in answers to questions K5 and K6) i K8. Number of convictions (including contested dedons) that were prosecuted using att authority odher than ARPA (in response to narrative question KIS bclow, list specific authority and cases in which each authority was used) i K9. Total amount collected in crl;ainal fines under ARPA only K10. Number of administradve, civil assessments using an authority other thsa.AHA 7

Kil. 'Iotal amount of civil penalty assessments collected under ARPA only i

5 K12. Costr. of restoring or repairir.g looted or vandallied archeological resources -

K13. Total amount given in rewards pursuant to ARPA only p

10 of 1I

(.

e k

ITM Anhoological Ac0vkies Aserwy ome.

Section K. Ardwelogkal Enforcement (Conduded)

K14. Commercial value of archeological resources sclred and retained by the government under ARPA only K15. Commercial value of property forfelled in ARPA convictions only K16. Estimated cost of agency archeologicallaw enforcement.

K17 (upmte ehem). Provide analysis, interpretation and clarification at esponses to questions about archeological law enforcement, ine!uding details of the response to question K8.

Kl8 (wpate.how). Art. any actions planned or unlerway (1) to develop documents for reporting suspected ARPA violations, and/or (2) establishing procedures concerning when and how these documents are to be completed by officers, employees, and agents of their respective agencies? If so, describe.

K19 ( pew oh m). Describe effective cooperative projects, methods, and/or techniques the agency has used to improve archeological preservation through law enforcement. Examples might include the use of remote sensing equipment for monitoring site locatiot.s, or interagency cooperative agreewnts for combined surveillance of adjacent land units and concurrent jurisdiction of law enforcement personnel, 11 of 11

/