ML20198D241
| ML20198D241 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/06/1986 |
| From: | Moist R, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198D118 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900931 NUDOCS 8605230198 | |
| Download: ML20198D241 (14) | |
Text
L i
ORGANIZATION:
PATEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA REPORT INSPECTION
[NSPECTION NO.-
99900931/86-01 DATE: 3/17-21/86
)N-SITE HOURS: 84 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Patel Enterprises, Inc.
ATTN: Dr. M. C. Patel, President 3400 Blue Spring Road, Northwest Suite B-3 Huntsville, Alabama 35810 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: Mr. T. Utech
'TFIFPHONF N11MRFR-(900 RRQ 9000 NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:
Patel Enterprises, Inc. (PEI) provide nuclear services related to the following: equipment qualification program develop-ment; material aging analysis; qualification documentation assessment; qualification maintenance program; and seismic qualification programs to include design and analysis.
Approximately 50 percent of the services are nuclear power related. Approximately 20 employees are devoted to these efforts.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: ) Gu(Mi //, 22/Mi 6-6-P/o
- k. N. M61st, Equipment Qualification Inspection Date Section (EQIS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
R. Lasky, EQIS M. Jacobus. Sandia National Laboratory Ok (o
Osm APPROVED BY:
Uldis Potapovs, Chief, EQIS, Vendor Program Branch Date
(
INSPECTICN BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
SA$ES:
10 CFR P6rt 50, Appendix B and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE: This inspection consisted of:
(1) a technical evaluation of equipment qualification (EQ) test activities for safety-related equipment and (2) verification of implementation of the quality f
assurance (QA) program.
l PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: James A. Fitzpatrick (50-333); Brunswick 1 and 2 (50-325/324); Robinson 2 (50-261); Calvert Cliffs 1 and 2 (50-317/318) l I
[EUO5230195I560521 T
~
i PDR GA999'EMVPATEL s 9.9900931 _i
.PDR
L ORGANIZATION:
PATEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900931/86-01 RESULTS:
) AGE 2 of 5 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None.
B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and paragraph 5.5.2 of the Quality Assurance Manual, test procedures PEI-TR-860500-01 for Job Number (JN) 8605 and PEI-TR-860100-01 for Job Number 8601 were revised, however, the original controlled copies of both test procedures were not marked V0ID or SUPERSEDED.
2.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 3.4 of Quality Engineering-Procedure 4.1, Patel orally authorized their vendor to perform testing to different require-ments than that specified in Purchase Order 1024 for JN 8603 without documenting this authorization.
3.
Contrary to Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 3.1 of Quality Engineering Procedure 3.4, it could not be determined that the final conclusions in assessment reports PEI-TR-83-4-33, JN 8305-12 and PEI-TR-82-4-50, JN 8201 were sound and accurate.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None.
D.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Background - Patel Enterprises performs no equipment qualification (EQ) testing in-house. All EQ testing is subcontracted to outside vendors.
Patel evaluates the results of the EQ testing and submits a final test report to their customer.
2.
QA Program Implementation Review - The NRC inspection team reviewed ten JN files containing documentation which supported testing efforts. Documentation included purchase orders, receiving and shipping documents, EQ test plans and procedures, test reports, and test data. The inspection teams review of the above documentation was to verify continued implementation of the Patel QA program.
L 1
=
ORGANIZATION:
PATEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA REPORT INSPECTION NO.-
99900931/86-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 5 The NRC team leader reviewed the changes that were incorporated into Revision F of the QA manual. The NRC team leader determined that the changes were minor and did not change Patel's QA program with respect to the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
3.
Technical Evaluation - The NRC inspection team performed a technical evaluation and review of seven test programs and three final assess-ments for qualification testing of safety-related electrical equipment. The following table summarizes the job number.(JN) files examined, including equipment type, plant and types of documents examined.
M Equipment Type Plant Documents Examined 8601 terminal blocks Cooper Test procedure (TP), purchase order (P0), qualification plan (QP), receiving and shipping documents (R&S),
test data (TD) 8603 splices Fitzpatrick TP, P0, QP, R&S, test report (TR) 8605 cables Calvert Cliffs TP, P0, QP, R&S, TR 8504 conformal coating various TR 8412 splices various TP 8429 tape splice / cables Fitzpatrick TP, P0, QP, R&S, TD, TR l
8430 terminal blocks Fitzpatrick TP, P0, QP, R&S, TD, TR 8201 RTD's, thermocouples Fitzpatrick Assessacnt report (AR),1R, Letter, P0 8305-12 cables Brunswick AR, TR, P0 8310-11 level transmitter Robinson AR, TR, P0 The NRC inspection team reviewed the EQ process prescribed in each test report / test plan / procedure and reviewed test results, including l
the bases for accelerated thermal aging and radiation and verified calculations.
L 1
ORGANIZATION:
PATEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99900931/86-01 RESULTS:
) AGE 4 of 5 Seven test programs and three assessments were examined to ensure that Patel had controlled the following as applicable:
a.
Adequate test instrumentation and their accuracies were described and used to meet the requirements of IEEE-STD-323/1974.
b.
Equipment interfaces were addressed, Test acceptance criteria were established as described in c.
the test specification or in the design engineering documents, such as calculations and engineering letters to meet the requirements of IEEE-STD-323/1974.
d.
Same equipment was used for all phases of testing and represented a standard production item, Environmental conditions were established and described (e.g.,
e.
pressure and temperature profiles, and thermal aging factors were consistent with those outlined in the test specification or test plan).
f.
Test results were adequately reduced and evaluated against established acceptance criteria described in customer test specifications or purchase orders, g.
All prerequisites for the given tests as outlined in the test specification-had been met.
h.
Test equipment included a descriptien of all materials, parts, and subcomponents.
l i.
Notice of Anomaly reports were properly documented.
J.
Appropriate margins were applied.
l k.
Functional performance requirements met.
Three nonconformances were noted during this review as identified in B.1, 8.2, and B.3.
l With respect to Nonconformance B.2, Patel Enterprises (PE) procured services with a vendor via P01024 for JN 8603 to perform aging of splices.
Patel orally authorized their vendor to perform testing to different requirements than that specified in P0 1024 without docu-menting this authorization.
As a result of this, Patel's test
a ORGANIZATION: PATEL ENTERPRISES, INC.
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA REPORT INSPECTION N0.-
99900931/86-01 RESULTS:
PAGE 5 of 5 procedure PEI-TR-82-4-203 was not revised until after the test was a
completed by the vendor and P01024 never was revised.
With respect to Nonconformance B.3, assessment report PEI-TR-83-4-33 for JN 8305-12 was an evaluation of test reports on Eaton (Samuel Moore) DEK0RON XLPE/LSPE insulated instrumentation and control cable for Brunswick.
The NRC inspection team identified a concern in the evaluation of functional performance criteria during the accident simulation. The documentation analyses (Section 3.2 of Patel report PEI-TR-83-4-33) indicated a positive response to the question:
"Are functional tests as performed adequate to demonstrate that the functional requirements (accuracy, repeatability, insulation resistance, etc.) for the equipment during the accident simulation can be met?" However, no required functional performance requirements were available from Patel's customer to make the determination of the cables meeting their functional per-formance requirements. Assessment Report PEI-TR-82-4-50 for JN 8201 was an evaluation of test report on Weed RTD's and thermocouples for application at James A. Fitzpatrick. The NRC inspection team iden-tified a concern similar to that identified for the Brunswick cable assessment. However, in this case, in addition to the absence of functional performance requirements, no data was available for instrument performance during the accident simulation (except that no opens or shorts occurred in the test specimens).
4.
Followup Items - The NRC inspector followed up on an item that was questioned during a recent inspection at Corporate Consulting and Development Company, LTD (CCL) (inspection report 99900511/85-02).
CCL was performing an accident simulation test for Patel Enterprises but their scope of work oid not include post-accident functional tests for wick seals and connector assembles. During this inspec-tion at Patel the NRC inspector reviewed certification test report 50-4198-2 which verified that post-accident functional tests were perfortned for agino, radiation and accident simulation by another vendor.
Patel personnel indicated the reason for using the same vendor was to have consistency in the test data for post functional testing.
PERSONS CCNT:CTED Company 0761SYNDhSGSJtJC-Cates /7 N'#2Cd/99$
Docket / Report No. 9Wadf3//ff-d/
Inscector t
~
Page~ of X
Pre-Inspection Conference Post-Inspection Conference NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Drint)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
SAriclV M6/ST SO $ NST ENG/d66R USARC Ricm o usw is i rasr Escasez us nec letww\\1tlk<h tR. L 1 h.l b,_
Pa k t a,..i s Jen6>is s nsMJ-"so pde/
(> N 4 5 %
ConwcT f\\pu /96 b4 Rn v
aN W
m m
L PERSCNS CCNT:CTED Cwspany Pa rf f E a le2 Pl!Sfs T K 3 //7-2i/ff cates Cocket/ReportNo.? WOO 931fY8-Cl inscector Moisr/ Lase'/
i i
Page _ of NAMO Please PH nt)
TIT 1.E(Please Drint)
ORGANIZATION (Please Orint)
ToHeany ~5eweras Vice Persiden4 -apso Rrs t-k ety OTEC4 Die. 3cdvcm Msuv%ce M A-T E L (Ab b4 hubs C mTrzAtt Admid /GA 4 DM /d bA-TE b
_ _ O hR>l E L A to si2 % b *9er 34rs L rect; by h em m - et ht ae W
M
=
m
L 4
PERSCNS CCNTACTED Canpany h 7El 6 4 ra 2 M 'SfS Ta c-cates 3/Dt/24 Occket/ Report No. 99fdO93//84'd/
Inspector Pre-Inspection Conference M
Post-Inspection Conference
~
NAME(Please Print)
TIT 1.E(Please Drint)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print) hAAkly' MG/Jr EG T657 SMGiwGGe L)5 SJ R C
$1cHMO lgsKy' dtQ f f y g r 6 sic 1agggt u5MQc M anw P.4 1
M s i J.< w t-h et E.ngin us.
w_ww LL L W _Jk.
h'. m L h l A ss,,, m a DA L cm.,Lo_s Johny F. denkins
&c hsicien+, #5D P4cl E ~3 ncers i
C Wh Q%
bigOppuue%m,4
$dqupe<3 p Rm/
ec w m m m ser M a b eeers
~
l I
l l
l l
m i
t PERSONS CONTACTED 7 7-)/!fr Dates Company,
N7,su f Docket / Report No. @M93 / f4rd /
Inspector
(
Page d of l
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Prinq T llhch hlre e.fnhur'-
Y tm d.
W. kw Ibn Ba.-iveso Pdd r
m-h- &. -
94 AN F, d & a O
e O
6 l
I t
l
~
l D
a 0
]
ll
~
5=
-o jQ r
e
' 9 cC c -
d, fe c
i u.
ae s i
s.
c
~s j ce
,L v
P
~if e - 6 j'[E t
e T,dM a,
/
r a
r'
/c C
a w
o -
o g.
"c u
s i
y mp T v
/
t s
~
d E o
s b
e c t
/
t 9
N Gs wP s
e
/
a w
j
~s v
c
~
c g
s 6
f t
I e l'c
'l O r
d p,
j
/'
c-*
e Q
'2 u
d U
t e
f"f I
a b
'c e
s t
N 0 a
I c
c P
S Qa x e 4
o m
s..~e t
t k
E
'l u s
u P
ad L t p
f s
1 r.
T d s r
L r
o
'n T
<s 1 A
2E r e i
K. oG a R Fe A
w
- m. #i e
S 3
o
'a e fe y r
1 C
P t
pe W
c# a t
O E A P
cs eA f 2 Pd e
/s c/
e R P R
s m
a O.
)
f
'k L
S.
,i a.
L T
J L
o t
e t
kA E
e c
t u.
c e
s t
t t
c c G e
"a'E t
ai sluQ i
T o
r r
Zl F
e
. c e
t as le t.
2 a
A p
wT M
s, o
P u
s S
s b
B s
a yP
- s af h
- P.
D e.ef i
r s
y rH
((* CM u
N F
c c
a h
LA r
O T
s.-
o s
s2LT UPy c.-
a e
/
r c
T N
e s
2 t e
a h
e i e 9
ctf h
j<
yu n~N h
l c
L.
Son r
Ql e.M nM l
s c
- a o, ja, r lo wN o
a e
<y C
t C
r a9 e
c o
9 ss p h )a.
f D
s eR
~.
n l0 s r r e
igP
~t N
t ** e k c A
c u
r e s
e ror t
w u
e t
o To c
?y;, b e
o d
b j
Fr k w
9 r
n"p o r
u E
/
s j
c e
O t
e r
t o
P.
S a md s
~ E*c c
N Ps 4
Eg7 c
E 7'e t
+
f s
], o as r
e#
I 4
o
[,,
u kst M
nk z
s e
o e
d:
4 a
k r.
i h
s i
r a t'
w, c /g e
o k'
ra c e
T.
A T
Y y
- L t '
s o e f
ol a
a )y'D.
ef.
l
(
g~>c'&
)
r s
r c
a A c
E wd L G
4 ~
b
)
o h
"yf oo p.
e e
E g1r y
ns g
N S
l DeT r
o ddw!
a o)
E e*
c Ss a
S
~A s
l r'
C s
o j m
d" m
Sa G
e w
r ri ce T
aP u
s r
N mh e
e
'e P u
+
S r 4
o E
oc o
e c
a e
e r
c r
)/T r
o
+h fn f
e r
r t
l s
f r
c e
f c
M f
k a
si
/-
I. l e
e
- A l
s a
r aet e
]
O
- P e
e r
t>
rb.Y t0' r
sv u
f s
C i
H O
e ""
c a
k e
t i
i e.
L uN i
S Fg P
s%
T s
t s
T a
0 C
FiJ
~
R.T l
r 7
5 i
5 b
ER 6
8 2-l' TO r
W /s
/
- l8 lB lR
/c l8
$lf' a
f 9
8 TP r
/
/
3 5
9 2
y
/
a
/
I'
/
/
2 4
E.E
/o,
/z 2
p
/
/
/
/_
lS
/
1R~
2
/
1 C
2 I'
i 1
I
/
v.
I r
E_E I
I
,L,,, ~
R.T g5 s
0 g
C TP O
o C
O O
~
a l
o l
LR i
.I c
I I
/
7' l
7 I.
8 E'
6 l
A-R' Rw 2
9 5
0 i
T RO T
E 5
T W P0 5
5 1
Rc S
EH
?w
~
T d
DE T. c-4 2
/
E.
O
't 9
F-o TRH f
Eg N E 2 T
~
Ac 5
1 o
f yl TE L W o.
i E/
2 Js 6
'O f*
gc
[0 73 W P 'B E f
E P 9 AeA S
A B
pM g
L
. G lCu U MEA 4
uSN y
c N "8 ONcA o
R lw O
lEAoH I
E E
D Wc cHDC 4
J AEo
.R T P
P r
p 5
r O
RPrACOM
~
f
}L f
f O
o DSp9qPI p
Y I
MU p
l P
R S
L, E' r S
g R
o P
f P
L E
~
f t
P t
EoC HO.M
'0 r C J o v WPeA
- o. H.
N c A S T.
g 3
ll T
7 f
2 T DSP K*
l U
l 1
l l
9
l l
o t
jllh c
l I
o1 c
7 ht d
'h q
7 d s
1 r
i C
u fn T
?_
t t
o s
/
ar 7 A
5 b
D u
A F /iTt C
Ru
/
o~
/
0 O
7 f-s-
i s
tn C
?aef Ke A
n ?. i l
b f
fi O
o' /
e t
sh Ej
}r N
s w
L
/
e C
u 3 Dm
}/
C u
ss c
o
),
e s
r pu P
a pu t
s
)
c r
t p
e 3
f 0
'Y s
m,r. gen fm/
s 'L F
o r
g_a r
t'_So n
o c
SS e
oM 0
f-L i
b h
t f
1 i e
5 r
/
tf n
oT 7
en4s mJ d
p Min 5
/
G a n
is s
n/e 8
ueC o
o Tg ru a
o.
o a
i C
7 T
f 3o c
I
/r
$c r
o d
t eb n
A p
( uo c
a r
i va$ c A
a C s.
a 4 J [n er L
x v c s
C Dnw sC; u aE c
e s
r
{-
o t
d A
a el c
tn3 ePoG t
c (C
W du e ex s.
i r
a E A Jh S'
c u
t E
, ci r
i oR P 7h(S s */
7 T
pcg aa o
u 3
s s &s c
T [f c
i o
A o
t 7c je rc P
a iu oi 5, c J
h ge ni a
E.
5.-
r e
A sd c
oi2 s
i G
7n r A 0
t Sg "t
s T
M Gi s n
7 Ae C E
f e i ud E. ag U
so 7
L SsG lU 2J r
t l l* ;;
e J
t s.
G X
m c,
nP F
ul o
/
"l M
T f
2 daE d
$r G p
sEs O
e Aa r
c o
C r
/
f aj T
osI S
a l
c f
t 1
f d
ia Tr i
1 a
n ft RNg S
t 3
u 0
c 2
top i
s S
o w
- u. n o
sA t
l_ m o
&irP!
Kg V
D s
n fe Es f5 P
adE u
S eo Mef Cu I.NyCp 7
e G
/ Mr S
T qs Cc oy h
Y Re l 3 A2 Op Os70d ep To og 0
d
/
E a
a r e t
e i r L
e c
m a
t o
c o
s H
T s
uI Ts n
nFa 9
g s
G c
o f f s TuJ eL a I
A T
n rEe, E iL a
P rs M
[ h.h,B
?_
M mD. J ee aeurs.7 i
s fd 1
RlN al Y e g
/
6s S
e G
9 6w E
r iO Nmy 5 i o N
A D
Dc d
u e 6
t s
U s
o 7 mS A
EeOGrm t/y h/
E o
R sE Q O (P e
s s
i r
I Os r
n T c T
eP T
A Ac h
sS A s
& C a A
r c
T Ni C
f 4 s. d:f o
ci H
5 3
sfr s 2 sp
/
i c
b A uR
/
C i
E At Ncf i
F I
a Pk F
7
=
c n
n f F
/ H Hc He r
M CPrw Lg i
t Ha r
/
G T
l o *T 1
0 ae b
u c t.
i C
c r TN u
s t
St 2
nP R
y b
i 2r s
?t P u Y 6. i C
smq 0
$ X/ cP
)
L )A f oG E
i
)U o
0 q
O OPA C
/ s. f /~ 7 u B f c h
P S.
~
RT s
L b
f I'
w&m 5
9 Ee P
S(
E s
9 f
c To 2
l f
s s
t 8
p s
TP V
G T
a
/y 5'
u a
f t
o U
~
E s
c D
p N
f S.
d A
J 8
l u
)s 7
~
o 2
9 7
6 2
J
/
l o
h t
V-P R.T E
V 5
G $o T.P I
~
E
'._A
~
I R
tR r
4 2
>2
.9 r
t 5
s n
ko Ro u
t o
0 V
o i
r3 w
2-3 O
o es En M*
s o
l fo d
Dg l
i i
~
/
7 7
7
/
o TRH v
t 1n t
l 1g 2
I-9 (r
a TEt.W O i
e c
\\-
S E 3 b re q
G 9
e f.
ARnE t j
P Pr pPp GCOoHEa x p USg l
y C N ~8 D p f. A s
w o
e tEAeH n ~v In M
T I
D Wc c HD Cs W
T T
O t
0' o2 A
P R P r A C. R r AEo 0
0 0
R 0
F Ou P
P r
NQ P
O DSpqqPt R
S R
R P.
P 8
e e
l R
s
.a e e E
n C
P G EonDo. H sc El 2
E
/
Y WPaA a e l
L 5
7 9
0 T DSp
.I s s
~
/
l 1
~
! g '!
l W.
i i
1 c
e i
1 i
si 11 e
- 2 if Y; *6
.I I i i
l ti i
kW
'9 a he
!t (a
I uis a14,8.)l' l t j g t.
14 gkiy 4
4 ir t,,, e s!!
l.a6 4R $t,!
3 4 g>;3 i
m m
x n.
.e 4
~vg 9
m M
'g S
,J kY N
(1 N d d,
> $, sf d, 5, d, 4 h
'4 i
v
.a.sI4sJ 9l'W I
)t $,l 4
e t
m s
d 4
U p k<.e'
$)d i kj $ I ! id (id k e t
e 3
W l
i
's!PMIlijlii J4aldrs,addu;ii i
i J
i w;w e
.y o
!'% M 4 4,._ 3 4 2 4l 1 -tti h3 Ti i$
i
!1
! ? Y S-4 1,,,,
-GF i
i I
?
i ol i
lo I H il 1
1 i,
5>
~
E 4
sb Q
q Eg 4
y i
N w
w
~2 oi G
s h
I b
k M.
M
.hw.JI
(
'I 1 s e
g q
e
.o.
q.a N "
5 Op$
5$$5 5
i
=E 9 y a u os
!['h b
D k b k( Q h y[s 6'
cI i
I
> 'O w
ca e ? SJW; ram AM li N c6 I
M T ~,
l S
l f
l l7 y
'h I
UJ k
di y;
l;iiwil@ i e
I k
i 1
4-2m t
!\\ga;'s
+e o e
1 s
c s
a%
d N
T l
@s dq
- IW d
~a
$ t
$n j,
j m
- g g
s y
s g
I I
5 4 6i l d d, d e e 4 41 f
' ' +
l l
t f$
i E
1)
M l
d
't' y'
q r
F k*
Q g*
C 0 i
a r
- (.
j t
8b,
.T I
5 4' 9 q
,1 % b7I I tf, R
3 V
y R
4
'l i
9 3
J li a.E O
e 3
gd i
m gg x
i!
l q
't k
k 3
g
(
)
a 9
1 s
s w g
- v. a s g
J D
k k
4
[.
h l
Q L
Q
's S-E
- 'a e, *
~
w tl j
9 Q
(
1 do e
e pq 3
k b
N N
NgNFk
,6 A k d.
u
- M s%,q i
9 E]y 4I w
i i
4 s
l
$ Y-
- Q
'j j lM D-
-l 4
~Q t-
"A j
8IIIII l
)
)
l F
e gW s
9 i
,i
- i i
3 O
C Y
(*
2 4
i i
g f
- 2 8 k.$g #{
y o
6<
t O
bo J
(l Edd' d2 D
~ g 2,,gggy);
6 V J ~J I
_l g* g N
E T h
.J i
' 4 C 20 g y, 0 s yU O
rm i
i i
n.
t.)
o f Oi 4 O
,5 ;k l
w
s s
[Jt N
Q l
l I
i R.
l I
3 l
l l
I(1 e
] ,
l l.
I t!.
i O
4 4 l
)
l l(
1 M M i
th 4Ww sd
<V l
>ee
$$k l
g
't i.
I i
g/ wst e
s 4
g K
i i
O k
f l
)
s's j e
s t i
't i
g t
w i
Q I Y
!i I
iF G
W
% 4 v
g l
3 a l l
8 _
g W
C l
d s
~-
r l
y i
j j
i l
l F
i l
e I
k d
2 4
i a
f E
N k$
d 4
Y 3
k$&
6 h.
h G u$ w
- n.a Z u l
l g2gg2*g{
g leg $ot s
5 c
g La. tlf C. w g d -
- jW hh O Q@ c. g o't an
.A t e agt3 g.
Eopera i *S
?
c
.I C
? Ev5?As '
t
-_.