ML20197G951

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Preliminary Case Study on Review of motor-operated Valve Performance in LWRs for Peer Review.Current Valve Testing Program Inadequate to Assure Valve Reliability. Requests Comments within 30 Days.W/O Encl
ML20197G951
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/17/1986
From: Heltemes C
NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD)
To: Peters R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8605190011
Download: ML20197G951 (2)


Text

_.

9 APR 171986 Mr. Robert F. Peters, Manager Nuclear Licensing Toledo Edison Company 300 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43652

Dear Mr. Peters:

Subject:

Request for Peer Review Comments--Preliminary Case Study Report--

A Review of Motor-0perated Valve Performance A preliminary case study on a review of motor-operated valve performance in LWRs is enclosed. The review brings together previous NRC studies and documents (AE0D reports and IE bulletins, circulars, and information notices),

reviews over 1100 valve operator events (SCSS and NPRDS) from 1981 to the present, and incorporates new data from an NRC valve testing program that utilized signature tracing techniques on valves in operating plants. This report also responds to item 6(i) of the actions directed by the Executive Director for Operations to respond to the NRC staff investigations of the June 9, 1985 Davis-Besse event.

Our case study report concludes that current methods and procedures at many operating plants are not adequate to assure that valves will operate when needed. Furthermore, the deficiencies would generally not be detected by existing (plant procedures plant technical intended and specifications to assure ASME operability, such Code, Section as surveillance XI inservice testing) or plant operator observations. Thus, assurance of valve operability testing appears to be strongly dependent upon diagnostic capability to assess and evaluate failures to operate so that root causes of failure--including switch setpoints--are correctly determined and proper changes implemented. the issue of valve performance and reliability is a complex subject that involves several technical disciplines. The report makes three recommendations.

We are sending a copy of this preliminary report for information so that you will be aware of how we incorporated the signature tracing test data that you provided from safety-related, motor-operated valves at the Davis-Besse plant.

Because we have a formal review process for this type of report, as discussed below, we would welcome your comments as part of this process if you wish to participate.

In accordance with our " peer review" process prior to the finalization and distribution of orr case study reports, we are providing NRR, IE, Regional Offices, RES, NSAC and INP0 with a copy of a preliminary report for review and bV h.f

/

/

f if f 860$190011 860417 s

!jh F

PDR ADOCK 05000346' b P PM

0 .p I

Mr. Robert F. Peters comment, particularly regarding accuracy and completeness of the technical details. Changes to the findings, conclusions, and recommendations will be considered only if the underlying information concerning the details of plant design or systems operation is in error. Therefore, comments are being solicited on the technical accuracy of the report. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations are provided for your information in order that you may understand the significance AEOD places on these events and, therefore, obtain a more complete picture of the total report. We would welcome comments either informally by telephone or formally by memorandum.

Since we wish to finalize and issue the report shortly, we ask that any comments be received by us within 30 days from receipt of the preliminary copy. Should your office require some additional time beyond that point, please let us know; otherwise, it will be assumed that there are no coments.

As you may know, AE00 reports do not represent an official NRC position or the position of the responsible NRC program office. Our reports are one input to an ongoing review and evaluation process, and any recommendation contained in our final report will be considered and perhaps modified or eliminated by the responsible NRC office.

A copy of the preliminary report and this letter are being placed in the Public Document Room at 1717 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20555.

If you have any questions regarding this study, please feel free to contact Dr. Earl J. Brown of my staff. Dr. Brown can be reached at (301) 492-4437.

l Sincerely, M

C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data

Enclosure:

As Stated cc: A. DeAgazio, NRR DISTRIBUTION PDR AE0D CF ROAB CF ROAB SF EBrown MChiramal SRubin KBlack WLanning FHebdon CHeltemes FFC : ROAB  : SC:ROAB r : AC:ROAB  : D AJ0p  : D:AE0D  :  :

_ _ _ _ _ : _ _ _ _ .[/ 6_ _ _ : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _:__

dC _ r. _____:_

_______ t______:___.._______:___________

NAME : EBrown:as : MChiramal : SDRubin  : F bfh  : ltemes :  :

i DATE : 4//f/86  : 4//(./86  : 4//L /86  : 4/lv/86  : 4/ lI/86  :  :

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY