ML20197G241

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That 860506 Request for one-time Exemption from 10CFR50,App J Requirements Extending Tech Spec Surveillance 4.6.1.2d Until First Refueling Outage,Will Not Present Undue Risk to Public Health & Safety
ML20197G241
Person / Time
Site: Catawba Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/1986
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton, Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8605160145
Download: ML20197G241 (3)


Text

-- ._ - - - - - . . . . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

4

+ -

DUKE POWER GOMPANY P.O. box 33180 CHARLOTTE, N.C. 28242 HAL B. TUCKER TELEPHONE vaca emessoaw, (704) 073-4534-umaan renorcreen May 9, 1986 i

Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission Washington, D. C. 20555 i

Attention: Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Project Director PWR Project Directorate No. 4

Re
Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-413 i 10 CFR 50 Appendix J Exemption. Request j

Dear Mr. Denton:

1 On May 5, 1986, Duke Power Company (Duke) requested that Technical i Specification surveillance 4.6.1.2d. be extended until the Unit I first refueling outage. The postponement of Surveillance Requirement 4.6.'1.2d. for certain Containment penetrations requires a one-time exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50 Appendix J.Section III.D.3.

In the previous letter, a safety analysis was provided. The conclusion reached was that given the abre duration of the extension (approximately I'1/2 months) there ,ould be no significant reduction in the margin of safety provided.

4 Based on the justification provided in the May 5, 1986 letter an exemption from the requirements of Appendix J should be granted in accordance with 10 CFR 1

50.12(a)(2)(v). Special circumstances exist in that the exemption would i

provide .only temporary relief (1 1/2 months) from the requirements of Section  ;

III.D.3. of Appendix J in order to avoid a reactor shutdown. Duke has and will l make a good faith effort to comply with the regulations.- It is our intent,to conduct the surveillances as soon as possible. If the unit is placed in a condition where the tests can be conducted (i.e;, at least Mode 3-Hot Standby, for at least_2 weeks), the surveillances will be performed..

Based on the previous submittal, and the above justification, it is our i conclusion that the requested exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety and is consistent with the common defense and security.

5160 3

, P AD \

f

, PDk s -

1

, . , - , . - - , - , - , . . - - - , nn-. -_ ,, , , , -,,.-,-n , . - ,

Mr.. Harold R. Denton, Dirscter hay 9, 1986

( Page Two This request is supplemental to the May 5, 1986 letter, therefore the check for

$150 submitted previously applies to this proposal as well.

Very truly yours, g I_ _ -

Hal B. Tucker RWO: sib cc: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station i

1 i

l' i

l

Mr. Barold R. Dentcn, Diractsr Say 9, 1986 Page Four HAL B. TUCKER, being duly sworn, states that he is Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this application; and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge.

O d /k i Hal B. Tucker, Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9th day of May, 1986.

.; Wc A Notary Public My Commission Expires:

okt.oo , #(?

-g -

_ _ . _ .