ML20197F086

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of Date Change for 860513-15 Meetings W/Util in Bethesda,Md Re Forthcoming Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program.Meeting Originally Scheduled on 860520-22.Agenda Encl
ML20197F086
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/05/1986
From: Nerses V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Noonan V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8605150422
Download: ML20197F086 (20)
v • d • e


Text

'

..j- .

we arr4#

~g UNITED STATES

[

5 g

l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 l

h

',*****/ ,

W 0 3 N6 k h

Docket Nos.:

and 50-444 50-443 V MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR I.icensing-A .)

FROM: Victor Nerses, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #5 Divi:fon of PWR I.icensing-A _

SUBJECT:

FORTHCOMING SEABROOK PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM MEETING

  • IS-l$

DATE & TIME: May 3E2EE, 1986 8:30 a.m.

l.0 CATION: PSNH-NHYD, Seabrook Project Office 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1309 Bethesda, Maryland PURPOSE: To have the applicant address the staff coments and question that form the attached agenda.

PARTICIPANTS: PSNH-NHY NRC R. Sweeney, et al N. Romney, et al Victor Nerses, Project Manager i PWR Project Directorate #5  !

Division of PWR licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated i cc: See next page

  • Meetings between NRC technical staff and applicants for licenses are open for interested members of the public, petitioners, intervenors, or other parties to attend as observers pursuant to "Open Meeting Statement of NRC

, Staff Policy", 43 Federal Register 28058, 6/28/78. Those interested in attending this meeting should make their intentions known to the Project ,

Manager, V. Nerses, at (301) 492-8535, by no later than 1:00 p.m., May 19, I 1986. l l

l 8605150422 860505

{DR ADOCK 05000443 PDR

Mr. Robert J. Harris on Public Service Company of New Hampshire Seabrrok Nuclear Power Station cc:

Thomas Dignan, Esq. E. Tupper Kinder, Esq.

John A. Ritscher, Esq. G. Dana Bisbee, Esq.

Ropes and Gray Assistant Attorney General .

225 Franklin Street Office of Attorney General

Boston, Massachusetts 02110 208 State House Annex l Concord New Hampshire '

Mr. Bruce Beckley, Project Manager Public Service Company of New Hampshire Resident Inspector

Post Office Box 330 Seabrook Nuclear Power Station

)'

Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Post Office Box 700 _

i Dr. Murray Tye, President Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 Sun Valley Association 209 Sumer Street Mr. John DeVincentis, Director il Haverhill, Massachusetts 08139 Engineering and Licensing i

Yankee Atcmic Electric Company Robert A. Backus, Esq. 1671 Worchester Road 1 0'Neil, Backus and Spielman Framingham, Massachusetts 01701 i

116 Lowell Street Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 Mr. A.M. Ebner, Project Manager United Engineers & Constructors Mr. Phillip Ahrens, Esq. 30 South 17th Street i Assistant Attorney General Post' Office Box 8223 j State House, Station #6 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Augusta, Maine 04333 William S. Jordan, III I Mr. Warren Hall Diane Curran i Public Service Company of Harmon, Weiss & Jordan

New Hampshire 20001 S. street, NW i Post Office Box 300 Suite 430 l Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 Washington, D.C. 20009 i Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Jo Ann Shotwell, Esq.

!~

Ms. Jane Doughty Office of the Assistant Attorney 5 Market Street General Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 Environmental Protection Division i One Ashburton Place Ms. Diana P. Randall Bosten, Massachusetts 02108 .

! 70 Collins Street 3 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 D. Pierre G. Cameron, Jr. , Esq.

General Counsel

) Richard Hampe, Esq. Public Service Company of New i New Hampshire Civil Defense Agency Hampshire l

107 Pleasant Street Post Office Box 330 j Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Manchester, New Hampshire 03105 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

}

^

Public Service Company of 9- Seabrook Nuclear Power Station New Hampshire cc:

Mr. Calvin A. Canney, City Manager Mr. Alfred V. Sargent, City Hall Chairman 126 Daniel Street Board of Selectmen .

Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 Town of Salisbury, MA 01950 Ms. Letty Hett Senator Gordon J. Humphrey Town of Brentwood ATTN: Tom Burack

, RFD Dalton Road U. S. Senate Brentwood, New Hampshire Washington, D.C. 20510 Ms. Roberta C. Pevear Senator Gordon J. Humphrey _

Town of Hampton Falls, New Hampshire ATTN: Herb Boynton Drinkwater Road 1 Pillsbury Street Hampton Falls, New Hampshire 03844 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Ms. Sandra Gavutis Mr. Owen B. Durgin, Chairman Town of Kensington, New Hampshire Durham Board of Selectmen RDF 1 Town of Durham East Kingston, New Hampshire 03827 Durham, New Hampshire 03824 Ms. Anne Verga Chairman, Board of Selectmen Charles Cross, Esq.

Town Hall Shaines, Mardrigan and South Hampton, New Hampshire 03827 McEaschern 25 Maplewood Avenue Mr. Angie Machiros, Chairman Post Office Box 366 Board.of Selectmen Portsmouth, -New Hampshire 03801 for the Town of Newbury Newbury, Massachusetts 01950 Mr. Guy Chichester, Chairman Rye Nuclear Intervention Committee ,

Ms. Rosemary Cashman, Chairman c/o Rye Town Hall l Board of Selectmen 10 Central Road {

Town of Amesbury Rye, New Hampshire 03870 Town Hall i

Amesbury, Massachusetts 01913 Jane Spector i Federal Energy Regulatory Honorable Richard E. Sullivan Connission Mayor, City of Newburyport 825 North Capitol Street, N.E. I Office of the Mayor Room 8105 City Hall Washington, D.C. 20426 Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950 Mr. R. Sweeney Mr. Donald E. Chick, Town Manager New Hamphire Yankee Division Town of Exeter Public Service Company of New 10 Front Street Hampshire  ;

Exeter, New Hampshire 03823 7910 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Mr. William B. Derrickson Senior Vice President Public Service Company of New Hampshire Post Office Box 700, Route 1 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 l

.ro.44}

Meeting Notice Distribution 1DocketrFiles, NRC Participants NRC POR local PDR V. Nerses '

PDf5 R/F N. Romney ORAS -

H. Denton T. Novak V. Nerses ,

OEl.D -

E. Jordan -

B. Grimes J. Partlow .. ' ,

Receptionist (Buildingwheremeetingisbeingheld) -

ACRS (10)

OPA N. Olson Resident Inspector Regional Administrator cc: Licensee / applicant & Service 1.ist A

g l

l f

I l

1

. AGENDA FOR SEAhR00K, UNIT 1 .

' PUMP AND' VAL E INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM -

A. General Ouestions and Comments

~

1. Are all valves that are Appendix J, Type C, leak tested included in the IST program and categorized A or A/C as appropriate?
2. Relief Requests that reference the FSAR, Technical Specifications, and other documents should be e'xpanded to provide a brief discussion of the technical information contained in the -

. applicable document.

3. The NRC staff position concerning stroke time measurements of power operated valves is that those measurements must be trended in accordance with Section XI so the information can be utilized to monitor valve degradation and predict valve failure. The exception to this position is explained as follows.

Rapid-acting valves are defined as those power operated valves that stroke in 2 seconds or less. Relief from the trending requirements of Section XI (Paragraph IWV-3417(a), 1980 Edition through Winter 1981 Addenda) presents no safety concerns for these valves since variations in stroke times will be affected by slight variations in the response times of the personnel performing the tests. However, the staff ooes require that the licensee assign a maximum limiting stroke time of 2 seconds to these valves in order to obtain this Code relief. Where this requirement cannot be met, the licensee is required to meet tne Code. (See Note 25.)

4. The NRC has concluded that the applicable leak test procedures and requirements for containment isolation valves are determined by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. Relief from Paragraphs IWV-3421 through -3425 (1980 Edition through Winter 1981 Addenda) for containment isolation valves presents no safety problem since the intent of these paragraphs is met by Appendix J requirements, however, the licensee must comply with the Analysis of Leakage 1

. . . . . ,  :. n . '

Rates and Corrective Action Requirements Paragraphs IWV-3426 and

-3427 (1980 Edition through Winter 1981 Addenda). Additionally, l those valves that serve both a containment isolation function and l a pressure itolation function must be leak tested to b"oth .

Section XI and Appendix .1 requirements.

5. Not all valves addressed in Relief Request 10 are Category A/C valves.

~

6. A description of the plant operating modes should be added to the

- IST program legend.

B. Main Steam P&ID 202074 3

1. How are valves MS-PV3001 -PV3002, -PV3003, and -PV3004 fail safe tested quarterly? Can these valves be stroke timed during fail  :

safe testing?

2. Are valves MS-V94 and -V96 individually verified to full-stroke during testing? Do these valves perform a safety-related function in both" the open and closed positions?
3. Can valves MS-V127 and -V128 be stroke timed during fail safe testing?

l C. Emeraency Feedwater P&ID 202076

1. Should valves FW-V64 and -V70 be Category A/C in Figure 5.3?

Relief Request 5 does not apply to these valves as stated in Note 4. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising these two valves during each cold shutdown.

2. The system and P&ID identification at the top of page 3 of 47, figure 5.3, is incorrect.

2

. . ._. - 1

3. Why are valves FW-V307'iV39, -V48, and -V57 fail safe tested when j the P&ID indicates that-they fail "as-is"? Relief Request 1 does not apply to these valves as stated in Note 2.
4. Should valves FW-V76, -V82, -V88, and -V94 be Category A/C in- -

Figure 5.37 Relief Request 5 does not address valves FW-V82

-V88, and -V94 as stated in Note 4. Why has relief from exercising FW-V76 been requested twice and why is it categorized differently in those requests? Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising these four valves _

during each cold shutdown.

7 D. Main Turbine and Steam Drains P&ID 202086 .

1. What is the safety-related function of valves MS-V44, -V45, -V46, and -V477 E. Auxiliary Boiler Steam and Condensate Return P&ID 202100
1. What is the safety-related function of valves AS-V175 and -V1767 F. Diesel Generator Coolina Water i
1. Provide P&ID 202103 for our review.

G. Leak Detection P&ID 500037-2 ,

1. Review the safety-related function of valves LD-V4 and -V5 (Location D-3) to determine if they should be included in the IST program a,nd categorized A.

i 3

H. Containment Purae P&ID 604131

~..

1. Relief Request 7 does not address valves CAP-V1, -V2, -V3, and -V4 as stated in Note 8. Provide a detailed technical ~

justification for not full-stroke exercising these valves during each cold shutdown.

I. Fire Protection -P&ID 604146

1. Should valve V592 be listed as a passive valve? If not, it must -

. be exercised in accordance with the requirements of Section XI.

7 J. Post Accident Samolina . P&ID 804978

1. Is valve SS-FV2857 stroke timed when it is exercised quarterly?

Is this a rapid-acting valve?

2. Should valve SS-V273 be categorized A/C7 K. Component Coolina P& ids 804981 and 804982
1. Should valve CC-V32 be stroke timed when it is exercised quarterly?
2. Should the valve identified in Figure 5.3 as CC-V226 actually be CC-V2667
3. Should valve CC-V445 be stroke timed when it is exercised quarterly?

L. Floor Orain P&ID 804994

1. What is the P&ID location of valve WLD-V2007 e

4

a .. . .

~

2. WhatisthecorrectdeicriptionofvalveWLD-FV8331? Is this a rapid-acting valve?'

M. Reactor Coolant P& ids- 805002, 805003, and 805006

1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RC-V323 and RC-FV2881 during each cold shutdown. Is valve RC-FV2881 a rapid-acting valve?
2. Provide a more detailed technical justification for not

" full-stroke exercising valves RC-V22 and -V23 quarterly. Do these valves perform both a pressure boundary isolation function  ;

and a containment isolation function?

3. Provide a more detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RC-V87 and -V88 quarterly. Do these valves perform both a pressure boundary isolation function and a containment isolation function?

N. Reactor Coolant Pressurizer P&ID 805007

1. The NRC staff position concerning PORVs is that the valves be exercised each cold shutdown and if the PORVs are utilized for low-temperature overpressure protection that they be full-stroke exercised prior to initiation of system conditions for which vessel protection is needed. Therefore, provide a more detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RC-PCV456A and -PCV4568 during each cold shutdown. Are these valves rapid-acting valves?

5

~' .

O. Residual Heat Removal P&ID 805008

1. How are valves CBS-V55 and -V56 full-stroke exercised during pump tests?
2. How are valves RH-V4 and -V40 full-stroke exercised during pump tests?
3. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RH-V14 and -V26 quarterly. -
4. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RH-V15 and -V29 during cold shutdowns?
5. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RH-V30 and -V31 during cold shutdowns.
6. Review the safety-related function of valves RH-V14, -V26, -V32, and -V70 to determine if they should be categorized A.
7. Review the safety-related function of valves RH-FCV606, -FCV607,

-FCV618, and -FCV619 to determine if they should be included in the IST program.

P. Safety Iniection Accumulators P&ID 805009

1. The system and P&ID identification at the top of page 22 of 47, Figure 5.3, is incorrect.
2. .,Are valves SI-V3, -V17, -V32, and -V47 full-stroke exercised during each cold shutdown? Is power removed from the operators during celd shutdowns?

6

3. ArevalvesSI-VS,-V202-V35,and-V50leaktestedduringeach cold shutdown? The'se vilves have not been included in Relief Request 10. ,
4. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke ,

exercising valves SI-VS, -V6, -V20. -V21. -V35, -V36, -V50, l and -V51 during each cold shutdown. Does the accumulator l injection test performed during refueling outages demonstrate that these valves will acconsmodate the required design flow rate for which credit is taken in the safety analysis? Can -

valves SI-VS, -V20, -V35, and -V50 be full-stroke exercised during cold shutdowns utilizing RHR system flow?

5. Category A, passive, valves SI-V62 and -V70 are not required to be exercised according to Paragraph IWV-3700.

Q. Safety Injection-Hiah Head P&ID 805010 ,

1. How are valves CBS-V48 and -VS2 full-stroke exercised during pump Msting?

=

l 2. ?rovide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valvos RH-V50 and -V51 during each cold shutdown.

Relief Request 13 does not address these valves as stated in

[ Note 19.

3. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RH-V52 and -V53 during each cold shutdewn.

Relief Request 19 dcas not address these valves as stated in Note 19.

4. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke l exercising valves SI-V71 and -V96 during each cold shutdown.

Relief Request 19 does not address these valves as stated in l Note 19.

l 1

7 t - .

~

i' .

~ . .

i *

5. Review the safety-rettfed function of valves SI-V77 and -V102 to determine if they should be categorized A. .
6. Provide a detailed technical justification for not ful1-stroke exercising valves SI-V81, -V82, -V86, and -V87 during each cold shutdown. Relief Request 19 does not address these valves as stated in Note 19.
7. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves SI-V106 and -V110 during each cold shutdown. _

Relief Request 19 does not address these valves as stated in -

s Note 19.

?  :

8. Review the safety-related function of valve SI-V114 to determine if it should be categorized A.
9. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves SI-V118, -V122. -V126, and -V130 during each cold shutdown. Relief Request 19 does not address these valves as stated in Note 19. .
10. Should the stroke time value be the same for valves CBS-V49 and -V53 since they appear to be identical?

1

11. Review the safety-related function of valves SI-V138 and -V139 to determine if they should be categorized A. Has a maximum stroke time limit been determined for these valves?
12. In reference to Relief Request 20, what are the consequences of a loss of charging flow control? Can valves SI-V140, -V144 -V148,

-V152 -V156, and -V297 be partial-stroke exercised at the Code-specified frequency?

b 13. Is Category A valve SI-V157 leak rate tested?

l 8

R. Chemical and Volume Controi/ Purification P&ID 805011

1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CS-V142 and -V143 quarterly and durtng each cold shutdown.
2. Is Category A valve CS-V143 leak rate tested?
3. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising Category A/C valve CS-V144 quarterly or during each _

cold shutdown. What is the safety position of this valve? Is

~

this valve leak rate tested? 4

? . . i

4. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke  !

exercising valves CS-V149 and -V150 quarterly.

5. In reference to Relief Request 22, are the reactor coolant pumps ever secured at any time other than refueling outages? - - - -
6. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valve CS-V177 quarterly. What type of operator is installed on this valve? What is its safety-related function?
7. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CS-V178, -V179, -V181, and -V182 quarterly.

What is the safety-related function of these valves? Should valve CS-V180 be included in the IST program?

8. What are the consequences of full-stroke exercising valves CS-V185 and -V186 quarterly during power operation?
9. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves RC-LCV459 and -LCV460 quarterly. These valves i are incorrectly identified on page 25 of 47, Figure 5.3.

I 9 1 . ._ . . -

l

10. Provide a detailed tecEnical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CBS-V58 and -V60 quarterly and during cold shutdowns.
11. How is valve CS-V192 full-stroke exercised during pump testing? -

What is the safety-related position of this valve? .

1

12. Is the required design basis accident flow rate achieved during pump testing to demonstrate a full-stroke exercise of -

valves CS-V200 and -V2097 _

1

13. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke ,

2 exercising valves CS-LCV1128 and.-LCV112C quarterly. Why is it proposed to exercise these identical valves at different frequencies?

14. What is the safety-related function of valve CS-V2137
15. Review the safety-related function of valves CS-V154 -V158,

-V162, and -V166 to determine if they should be included in the IST program and categorized A.

S. Component Coolino P&ID 805016

1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CC-TV2771-1 and -TV2771-2 at least at a

~

refueling outage frequency. Relief Request 29 does not address these valves as stated in Note 26.

2. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CC-V447 and -V448 at least at a refueling outage frequency. Are these modulating valves whose stroke time need not be measured? Relief Request 29 does not address these valves as stated in Note 26.

10

.~,

  • T. ConDonent Coolino P&ID 805018 i
1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CC-TV2171-1 and -TV2171-2 at least at a

~

refueling outage frequency. These valves are incorrectly

identified on page 29 of 47, Figure 5.3. Relief Request 29 does not address these valves as stated in Note 26,
2. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CC-V341, -V426, and -V427 at least at a -

refueling outage frequency. Are these modulating valves whose stroke time need not be measured? Relief Request 29 does not 7 address these valves as stated in Note 26.

U. Service Water P&ID 805019

1. Review the safety-related function of valve SW-V75 (Location D-2) -

to determine if it should be included in the IST program and tested in accordance with Section XI.

2. Review the safety-related function of all check valves on P&ID 805019 that are utilized as vacuum breakers to determine if they should be included in the IST program. The NRC staff position concerning check valves utilized as vacuum breakers is that they should be included in the IST program. categorized C, and tested as closely as possible to the requirements of IWV-3520.

V. Nitrocen Gas P&ID 805020

1. Has a minimum value of limiting stroke time been assigned to valves NG-V13, -V14, -FV4609, and -FV46107 Are these passive values?

11

's

e ~.'

W. Reactor Makeuo Water P&ID 805021

1. Provide P&ID 805021 for our review.
2. Should valve RMW-V29 be identified as passive?
3. Has a maximum value of limiting stroke time been assigned to valve RMW-V307 X. Combustible Gas Control P&ID 805022
1. Has a maximum value of limiting stroke time been assigned to valves CGC-14 and -287
2. Review the safety-related function of valves CGC-4 and -25 to determine if they should be categorized A/C.
3. Review the safety-related function of valves CGC-3, -10,.-24, and -32 to determine if they should be categorized A.
4. Why is valve CGC-V46 identified as an active valve and exercised quarterly and then relief requested from exercising in Relief Request 87 Y. Containment Soray P&ID 805023
1. How is valve CBS-3 full-stroke exercised?
2. The valve identified.as CBS-V6 on page 34 of 47, Figure 5.3, is incorrect and should be CBS-V7. The valve identified as CBS-V7 should be CBS-V8 and the valve identified as CBS-V8 should be CBS-V9.
3. How is valve CBS-V7 full-stroke exercised?

l l

l l

12

e:

AA. Primary Component Coo 11no P&ID 805028

1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising valves CC-V175, -V176, -V256, and -V257 qua'rterly in ,

accordance with Section XI. Relief Request 22 does not address these valves as stated in Note 22 and it also appears that Note 22 does not apply.

2. 'What is the testing frequency of relief valves CC-V474 and -V8407

~

- BB. Primary Component Coolino P&ID 805029

1. Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke

, exercising valves CC-V168, -V557 -V121, and -V122 quarterly in accordance with Section XI. What is the correct valve number for

-V5577 Relief Request 22 does not address these valves and it also appears that Note 22 does not apply.

2. What is the testing frequency of relief valves CC-V410 and -V8457 CC. .D_emineralized Water P&ID 805030
1. What is the testing frequency of relief valve DM-V187 DD. Service Water P&ID 805033
1. Review the safety-related function of valves SW-V63 and -V64 to determine if they should be included in the IST program and tested in accordance with the requirements of Section'XI.

EE. Service Air P&ID 202108 and 804989

1. Review the safety-related function of valves SA-V229 and -V1042 to determine if they should be included in the IST program and categorized A.

l 14

4. Review the safety-reTafed function of valve CBS-V8 to determine if it should be cat ~egorized A. .

I

5. Review the safety-related function of valve CBS-V11 to determine if it should be categorized A. ~j i
6. Review the safety-related function of valve CBS-V12 to determine  !

if it should be categorized A/C instead of B. How is this valve full-stroke exercised during refueling outages? Provide a '

detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising _

this valve each cold shutdown.

P 7. Review the safety-related function of valve CBS-V14 to determine if it should be categorized A. -

8. Review the safety-related function of valve CBS-V17 to determine if it should be categorized A.
9. Review the safety-related function of valve CBS-V18 to determine .

if it should be categorized A/C. How is this valve full-stroke exercised during refueling outages? Provide a detailed technical justification for not full-stroke exercising this valve each cold

~'

shutdown.

10. Should valves CBS-V31, -V32, and -V33 be stroke timed when tested?

Z. Samole Service P&ID 805025 i

1. What is the normal position of valve RC-FV28367 l
2. It is unnecessary to full-stroke exercise relief valve RC-V312 quarterly.

13

FF. Containment Air Handlina r. P&ID 604131

1. Valve CAH-V12 should be Category A/C. Note 1 does not apply to' this check valve. .

Pumos

1. Provide the documentation that demonstrates that.all safety-related pumps are being tested quarterly in accordance with Section XI. This information should be included in the _

IST program and can be in the form of a table similar to the

~

valve test tables identifying the pump, tests performed, and any 7 applicable relief requests. ,

2. In reference to Relief Request 31, does using the computer readout when measuring pump flow provide repeatable test data?
3. Are both flow and differential pressure measured when testing the service water pumps?

i 15

  • ~ .

EMY 0 5 Msg Docket Nos.: 50-443 and 50-444 MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR licensing-A FROM: Victor Nerses, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #5

-Division of PWR licensing-A

SUBJECT:

FORTHCOMING SEABROOK PUMP AND VALVE INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM MEETING

  • DATE & TIME: May 20-22, 1986 8:30 a.m.

LOCATION: PSNH-NHYD, Seabrook Project Office 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1309 Bethesda, Maryland 1

PURPOSE: To have the applicant address the staff comments and question that form the attached agenda.

PARTICIPANTS: PSNH-NHY NRC l R. Sweeney, et al N. Romney, et al Victor Nerses, Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page

  • Meetings between NRC technical staff and applicants for licenses are open for interested members of. the public, petitioners, intervenors, or other parties to attend as observers pursuant to "Open Meeting Statement of NRC Staff Policy", 43 Federal Register 28058, 6/28/78. Those interested in attending this meeting should make their intentions' known to the Project Manager, V.-Nerses, at (301) 492-8535, by no later than-1:00 p.m., May 19, j, 1986. l D

d es 5/3'786 l l

1

- _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ - - - - _ - _ - - _ - _ _ - _ . -

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197F086&oldid=3011613"