ML20197E484

Notice of Violation from Insp on 970831-1011 & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $55,000.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Establish Measures to Assure That Conditions Adverse to Quality Promptly Identified

ML20197E484
Person / Time
Site:	Robinson
Issue date:	12/12/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20197E476	List: IR 05000261/1997010 ML20197E484
References
50-261-97-10, EA-97-490, NUDOCS 9712300014
Download: ML20197E484 (30)

Text

.

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND PROPOSED IMPOSITION OF CIVIL PENALTY Carolina Power & Light Company Docket Nos, 50 261 Robinson Unit 2 License Nos. DPR 23 EA 97 490 During an NRC inspection conducted from August 31 through October 11, 1997, violations of NRC requirements were identified.

In accordance with the

" General Statement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions,"

NUREG 1600, the NRC proposes to impose a civil penalty aursuant to Section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (Act), 42 J.S.C. 2282, and 10 CFR 2.205. The parcicular violations and associated civil penalty are set forth below:

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.

In the case of significant conditions adverse to cuality, the measures shall assure that the cause of the condition is cetermined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition.

A.

Contrary to the above, as of August 20, 1997, the licensee failed to establish measures M assure that conditions adverse to quality were promptly identified and corrected. Specifically, the licensee failed to identify that the "B" Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) output brecker control switch was mispositioned; and, therefore, failed to correct the switch position error resulting in the inoperability of the EDG.

(01013)

B.

Contrary to the above, as of August 20, 1997, the licensee failed to take adequate corrective action to preclude re>etition of a Severity Level III violation issued in March 14, 1994 (EA 93 298) involving position control errors affecting the EDG local control panels.

Specifically, the licensee did not take com>rehensive corrective action in that they failed to include the E)G output breaker control switches in Auxiliary Operator logs to be checked on rounds or take other measures to control activities affectinc the EDG local control panels.

(01023)

These violations represent a Severity Level III problem (Supplement I).

Civil Penalty

$55,000.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power & Light Company (Licensee) is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Director, Office of Enforcement. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 30 days of the date of this Notice of Violation and Proposed Imosition of Civil Penalty (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each alleged violation:

(1) admission or denial of the alleged violation, (2) the reasons for the 9712300014 971212 gDR ADOCK 05000261

-PDR

Notice of Violation and Proposed 2.

i E

Imposition of Civil Penalty i

i violation if admitted, and if denied, the reasons why, (3) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved. (4) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full l

compliance will be achieved.

If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be l

issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or' 4

why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Consideration may be given to extending the res)onse time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Sect 1on 182 of t1e Act. 42 U.S.C. 2232 - this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.

1 3

Within the same time as provided for the response required above under 10 CFR 2.201, the Licensee may pay the civil penalty by letter addressed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, with i

a check. draft, money order, or electronic transfer payable to the Treasurer 1

of the United States in the amount of the civil penalty proposed above, or may

^

4 protest imposition of the civil penalty in whole or in part, by a written answer addressed to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Should the Licensee fail to answer within the time 4

specified, an order imposing the civil penalty will be issued. Should the t

e Licensee elect to file an answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 protesting the civil penalty, in whole or in pirt, such answer shoulJ be clearly marked as an " Answer to a Notice of Violation" and may:

(1) deny the violations listed in this Notice, in whole or in part, (2) demonstrate extenuating circumstances (3) show error in this Notice, or (4) show other reasons why the penalty should not be imposed.

In addition to protesting the civil penalty in whole or in part, such answer may request remission or mitigation of the penalty.-

Any written answer in accordance with 10 CFR 2.205 should be set forth separately from the statement or explanation in reply pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, but may incorporate parts of the 10 CFR 2.201 reply by specific reference (e.g., citing page and paragraph numbers) to avoid repetition. The attention of the Licensee is directed to the other provisions of 10 CFR P. 205, regarding the procedure for imposing a civil penalty.

Upon failure to pay any civil penalty due which subsequently has been determined in accordance with the applicable provisions of 10 CFR 2.205, this matter may be referred to the Attorney General, and the penalty, unless compromised, remitted, or mitigated, may be collected by civil action pursuant to Section 234c of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2282c, i

The response noted above (Reply to Notice of Violation, letter with payment of civil penalty, and Answer to a Notice of Violation) should be addressed to:

. Hr. James Lieberman, Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville. MD 20852-

' 2738..with a copy to the Regional Administrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Robinson facility.-

_ + -

'= _.

-J.-

.-4A-

a h

Notice of Violation and Proposed 3

Imposition of Civil Penalty Because your res>onse will te placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR); to the extent possi)1e, it should not include an personal privacy roprietary, orsafeguardsinformationsothatitcanbepfacedinthePDRwitout redaction.

If personal privacy or proprietary information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, then please provide a bracketed copy of your response that identifies the information that should be protected and a

- redacted copy of your response that deletes such information. _ If you-request -

Withholding of such material, you muit s>ecifically identify the portions of -

i your response that you seek to have withield and provide in detail the bases for your claim of withholding (e.g., explain why the disclosut. of information will create an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy or provide the information required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) to support a request for withholding

- confidential commercial or financial information).

If safeguards information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please provide.the level of j

protection described in 10 CFR 73.21.

i

- Dated at Atlanta, Georgia i

this 12th day of December 1997 l

M 4

4 s

b 4

a.

fwsy-I-.y e

y e

4,-p-

-e--

a, array--.g.._vg-w w -i 9p*"es

'+

gy.yg-.-y.s.,gg

..,ywyJ ee n er.gwp-e-,

y.,y,w gy smap p.3r e

y eggn-2>

m 3

9 ww 6-r-p----.t

i 4

4 i

1 l

PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE AGENDA ROBINSON NUCLEAR PLANT NOVEMBER 2S, 1997. AT 2:00 P.H.

NRC REGION II 0FFICE, ATLANTA GEORGIA I.

OPENING REMARKS AND IMIRODUCTIONS-L. Reyes, Regional Administrator i

II.

NRC ENFORCEMENT POLICY A. B01AND, Director Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff III.

SUMMARY

OF THE ISSUES L, Reyes, Regional Administrator IV.

STATEMENT OF CONCERNS / APPARENT VIOLATION 4

L.

P11sco, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects V.

LICENSEE PRESENTATION-t VI.

BREAK / NRC CAUCUS VII.

NRC FOLLOWUP QUESTIONS VIII.

CLOSING REMARKS L 'Reyes, Regional Administrator I

Encicsure 2

(

I ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED

{

Note: Two apparent violations are presented below. They involve a 10 CFR 50, 1

Appendix Criterion 11 violation and a Criterion XVI violation.

1.

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion II, " Quality Assurance Program,"

i requires, in part, that the quality assurance program shall provide j

control over activities affecting the quality of systems and components, to an extent consistent with their importance to safety.

The licensee's quality assurance program did not provide controls over j

e activities affecting the quality of systems and components, to an extent consistent with their importar, iafety Specifically, the licensee i

failed to assure adequate con,gui ation controls of the position of the "B" Emergency Diesel Generat.' (EDG) output breaker control switch.

This resulted in the inoperuility of the EDG from potentially August 16 until August 20.-1997, due to the inadvertent mispositioning of the

switch, Controls for ensuring that the switch could not be inadvertently " bumped" were not implemented, e.g., switch protection covers, etc.

F.xisting operating lineup and surveillance procedures did not require verifications that the switch was in its correct position t

following switch manipulations for quarterly EDG testing, nor periodically during routine operator walkdowns. Additionally, the EDG control system was not designed with positive controls, e.g., alarms, to indicate that the switch was not in its correct position.

2.

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, " Corrective Action," requires, in part, that measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, i

deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.

As of August 20, 1997, the licensee did not establish measures to assure that conditions adverse to quality were promptly identified and corrected. S)ecifically, the licensee failed to identify and correct that the "B" Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) output breaker control switch was mispositioned from potentially August 16, 1997, when the switch was last observed by an operator to be in its correct position, until August 20, 1997, when the switch was-found mispositioned by the NRC resident inspector.

NOTE: THE APPARENT VIOLATIONS D?SCUSSED IN THIS PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT

-CONFERENCE-ARE SUBJECT T0 FURTHER REVIEW AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO ANY RESULTING ENFORCEMENT ACTION.

- i m

,m-+

w af y

r g

u-w Sr

'-yww'-

w-r

-s

-w-,---

w-w-e g

y

mm..

sr-4_.-,46..

m*.

..,_%_,_.p

_a..A.6--A

.__msa_a.4_M.a*_m

--.sa hh_4-4w_

Aia.- a m m.s s.iL_.-eAme._mMAwwaand*,w.e4,4

-N44-s

-de24L.

-a.4 4a m.L e

4 M

3 Q. CD N

~3

. C o8 p

..-.C 3

D W

0O c

Q o-Lij

.CD s

a O-CD I

Q o

v-c g

4s0 0

O O

C

.t N

LU O

i-u (D

E ow n

m

+

E o

cO e

to O

u O

Cw Z

C C

8 O

.c.

cC g

{

'O O

D' (D 2 co O

CU L

g I

O u

4.--

C C LLI gy[

$,1-

^55. K"0' J

T

,f p 2.w%s,i'lp _

E em

!.:' M b.#~

p'g m}Ni[q)

.,f:

v u.

~. -

iNg. g.L.6.

. 3,C?

R % l_:f, b '['% M. -

sma.u;st'tr.

33.,.p..s,_. n r%l*.

I y -yg; O i Jag, p w,

'... a y rve 7:

+

r mv.4 s,.,.

_ _. _. _ ~

---

..--.2.m---

._--++---------,---s 2,

-m, y

a-'e r-wr

--w-r

'w7'-mv-v-

w

l ITWdi6/Aj r

[g';s,'ll+::G%vB n

[u 1

se w a t

V= F;;$d9INTRODUCTION

[g! 9; 1

.a--

m m'

a m

Puraose of Meetinc i

a i

a

+ Discussion of EDG-B Generator Outaut Breaker

{

Control Switch Mis 30sitioning t

+ Identified August 20,1997 by NRC Resident m

Inspector a

+ Investigation determined switch was in tripped a

i n

position l

l m

m.

. a

. q..

\\

{N I ki'i;\\ IQ{\\

TNh,kEUb

mi e gggj tu!{

~

2 L Sv:d5 I

i

swea e

g wywn t=wnaa

nnww

!u3 !Qi=WSAGENDA t

u..

m.

=

a

=

in~: roc uc~: ion John Moyer u

a Condi": ion Inves~: iga: ion Rick IV oore l

=

u 1

a Design anc Significance Boa Duncan Correc:ive Actions John Moyer u

Summary Remar5 O

(_)

O V

g

.o O

x

~

C C

O o

._O m

.+.

1

.~.-.

Q e

V L

V C

Z c

S c

e O

O_

O O

o o o u.i O

m

, i*;.%fyg? J$ _', "?.

q..,,3t..; 't ;,. 'e l"*

Wt4K$v, I**

[j.(hJ$; -

bo5

..JL gg,,,,

k k-lk)$

3c::;s

,1..

y-A

. e /- (,

,.7 a.

' t

. c s u;

5 af E[h.*E Mf.' h

.$.h

. kk) ' s,*f, i

MER E

ME E

ME

[I );E'.E R:M E

~

N B E E E~__. m_._E..

y

..-,-,m-y.,m.__-,,

v-

[

!E!i,l! !1llI[,!.!

g

~

3 SD N

U O

R i

r le r n o

o a t

t a

aP T

rel r

o nJ e 'n e

U Ga ne C

O G

le s

s A_

eB iD 1

, i y

c M

/

n r

o e

O s

sr g

I y ee r v r

pimc e

O e

t m

le oe CR R

i n

E a

r A

P lo r

B tno C

G D

E dt c?[,)#m"

. )$...

-7

a. < 4 ! d+5 b my?

, qwa.

M7,Tf iD A gly _

f E4h t

mN_M$

[i,

t.

y igs{.,.

1 gk, r

}

5.

E

?'I it

?gM '

E=EEEEEE3 E

EEEEE E3 E Er L f,

j:!

1f l

ll lI t1.,

j litll

!ll!!

l

a emamm.Aa 8

e i

i I

I LU Z

l o_

J O

Y 1

J, l

i Z

a.

O I.

m

.J y

O 5

0 I

m y

p.

LU Z

v C

I YT

'f'M.

• 7 % ? 15' e'

6e FN l )fy t:0 *jdJhk.(?(

7 l

4 ; t>:k

4-

,.i,

. st y..

Lfq

,un,flit*D i

~ 2 :n

. ;Ac l

<r-.

~s 8

Wr.,

y

.t T

{$

[

\\

n~

anwa.s.3

[iE 5:

5.5 5 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E'.E E.E__'.53

_.3

~ _ _. _. _ _.

_,.-.i,.-we

8 s

l 1

s i

l e

I

• s l

j a.

4

. \\

p o

O

.c r

4 ljh l

w

• . * =

A.*

q

~ '

s..s.

,w (g

WEEEEEEE

,a

..=...,

s.

s cr>

_J O

T l

Z O

O u -e

.m+p - s y'

m -a m?;;[A yl

.y..

> LbM w

~

(,,,

s + >, g hj 1.-

~

n

--h y; pg+m-t nam.

4.,t

,74 *g;,a i,

-f

-y.. "a iv:

.e.1 g..,...,:.

rr

s? w s

... ' ' n'.

J,. 'g*gy*; Ep, u,

c,,

)-

4 v

4.-.

i Ar.

• '

• 4 9..

s#4(

j b ' f(.

'Y l

-ki (~',s'f' I

.. i le.

~

i.OSdft$YhfM

' s:.

$5 ElY'51R'S SR YME5Y YY B E ' E _5,5_;5iEb a

l i

-l m-e e/t r * -.e d, t. i a t :, o., ', :l*4

.. s

., & r i

':3 f.

II bb.

j

,s

.c t E, *$,.

,,,}

cy m

,;E w.m C. O. SEQUENCE OF EVENTS

.:E g.

EDG-8 Generator Output Breaker Control Switch Mispositioning i

07/27/97 08/03/97 C8/10/97 08/17/97 a

(S lM lT lWlT lF lS SlMj lWlT lF lS SlM lT lWlT lF lS SlM lT lWlT lF lS T

h 8/20/97 @ 1115 NRC RI ideett*hed E

s~tca co-o '+on 2

I l

7/29/97 AO 8/18/97 & 8/19/97

@ 1544 Suntch j

7/28/97 Indcated Panel 8/16-18/97 AOs Stated

. Returned to Neutrat EDG-U Checked Twice &

SSO Verified Switch in Normal 1

Monthly Abnormat Posetson Correct Switch Posrtion CR inetiat?d El.T

}

Surv.

not Noted Posihon Chartered L

t 4

E E

- v.-

, e E

E E

.' { ? ?, U

, l ll.

s

> n :4, ty:{'N.f *Q S

I-

.. >.-y g

3 i,

d @ M Ni.

i i 'mlssJi_ )'.

lEw}:

W i

tru %

f *E }.,g gg t

ey,

, p _,,

.., $l e k fib

-1r r

%,. & : 2

?

L

3---=

.n.-J_4

.-A

1. .A

-.m.

&__ _ _,,.e m

m.

_.E ch.a.a.ma, a.

m.

• amm_

4.am-u_J 22 e

1. .m__.

a

__mA.--.**2--...A..

A__m-men.e...e m.6 m aa

• w A

Aw e-.d_-,n

_,a--

.a h

3 Ch

%O L,

O CD CD bC w

-C4 D

o cc 0

0 0

W

'E l

._x.

CD.-

H

.M E

(D J

mE M

(D O

._J u@b W

w

• V O

U D

(D 2

t O-c 1

~O c

D._

l O.- g

.o w

~

0)

CU O

O a CD O

(D C o.. g r --

O u

(

b2mO O

E $bC O 3' t..o CD c e

[

b.D D

>V LIJ O.~O l

03 r c

)

Q3D mo l

l1J CD <f CO l

Z a

m l

gy$d6M$$h

.nm,,__

,. wmm,~,,.

yEM I-@M*r r.

k., $ X F / p @W E '

. ~.

% cgff. p.;.a J'

i.;,N'i ~

W.T

.;$j

. a r.iiD E dM",;Ih~,d;E idi$@i

1. . P

-m

[(h. ) %N_

ii_; 4f ;,,E555555M5B NE E

, _._E. E ~ B_i

~

' tk,' d Ih I

E iJ

h

,.w a.:

• _e[tyjj?II[$5 f

m p.,g e 4

r a. 4 r,

7bR;.O'lDESIGN

',:4. l "#

l!

i n

m 1

EDG-3 Genera:or Outaut Brea<er Control i

Swi:ch a

l a

a

+ Westinghouse W-2 switch a

+ Manually opens and closes generator breaker a

8 from local panel i

aa 1

a i

. 4 ::x::;;

t a <.a.w;.:

.u..

• Q_:j'Nn A>flhd

?E:!+b $"l^My

1. f t

10

=.zy; -

iJ l

$L l

I

M

%s e m

_c, m u.-

!y@.$>na,e sMi re,

..,-u. _m a-4m

t. - Toyage;;

.

dj9 -y c: p

.rgspa: DESIGN

.7..

.m

~

u-Four positions with s 3 ring return to neutral:

+

+ Close a

+ Neutral B

+ Tnp

+ Trip " Pull Out" E

. Not used as primary clearance boundary Not used in current procedures a

g: a w

iy':A a M i E.;,.py.: ; A3

^;[lli?Y 4%W')

f h

if e

uE,!k p$.'f;Ny;.

W ~ &.t l tkf dy.d. :

11 p

p M$$455r v

--e m.

_a-,------

Psem, m

e.x o m$5Q3i1 M

[E(

,c n n a m.

em m m.

in c:ii DESIGN m

a I

a m

a a Genera:or Ou: 3u: Brea <er O aeration i

a a

+ Generator outaut areaker receives automatic j

close signal on bus undervoltage 8

+ If control switch in Trip " Pull Out" position

+ Breaker will close with a close signal m

8

+ Breaker will instantly reopen and lock-out with

)

m a

anti-pump feature a

+ Breaker reset requires removing and u

tE-t.hs.

reinstalling control power fuses

)u ;dLN)ff:

o.m ii 41 i

i!gN!bkk'!

,n,_fhiW:;g y

un

>a in Im 1Psie254 im}moy MFfF SIGNIFICANCE a

s a

Sa'e~:y SignFicance a

a m'

+ EDG-B unavailable for design basis " unction without operator action

+ Technical Specification C2nditions a

+ A" ESFAS testing a

m a

+ A-1" battery charger a

a

+ SDAFW pump an,

+ HVH6A room cooler l E :: w n ;

(ElijIjb2%.j i

k kh ja -

j

-l in d 14 o

In 5

m..

1.L

m\\.,.. m.m+

,i

• • g

. - 74 %,.,;y s q f g f((-?DYl.rf'

%;2;;'jg

$^

E

:l%y

s. n

!: Md4.n% 1,vtiPS SIGNIFICA\\lCE

~

~

.E m

,4

,E.

E E

EDG-B Generator Output Breaker Control Switch Mispositioning E

csttorg7 csf1737 E

(

se2a v e siis E

NRO Rt identred Swech Cond4en st1stg7 s stigm e 15 S*tch E

8/16-13/97 AOs Sta'ed Retumed to Newal, i

SSO Ve-fed Swdch in Norma:

I E

O : red Sanch poseen CR Inttiated ERT Posden Cha-*e ed E

E E

i i

_ _-_ 8 8/17/97 E/18.'97 166 min. (1951-2117 hrs) 6rmn

-2&WW N. '~

T ESF Ctm Iso V?vs (0325-0734 hes) b t

y::1 i ': :

00s.sut avaeaw A-t ea: terr

E %4%. t5060 F!!

'"c'"""*"r

'"*'S

S-

+.

9 3

surve.:tance performance battery sve'abte s,m97 4

e. n '..# -... =

[B @h.if)-l3 C5nt*JM f

HVHGA OOS.T St & Ctml Spray

- ava*

cc s

I y,,. :, y.h l4 t

[j,::I') If$d'h 7

.g y

,.-n.

mamm i s #r a n uyn ta

.[h

[_

M G2,%{.

h

!m:y%1 SIGNIFICANCE

~

=n:.

a m

m

+ Probabilistic Safety Assessment a

+ RNP wor< coorcination 3rocedure E

I ACDP < 1 E -6 (non-risk significant) m

+ Actual condition from August 16-20,1997 a

a m

ACDP = 1.2 E -6

+ Condition equivalent to planned evolution that a

would have required additionsi management a

.a oversight to proceed u-in Q,

$ m ; $

R-h;;

j r re.w.,

yum(NWt$N wen

_e m

i I-h k Ef im m al i

in de !21 ta m m l

.in h56 la: cN CORRECT VE ACTION

~

my

.m

~

m e

a a Immecia:e Ac: ions a

+ Switch examined and returned to neutral position a

a a

+ 10 CFR 50.72 one-hour notification made to NRC e

a

+ Condition report initiated

+ Event Review Team chartered

+ Switch position verification

+ Located outside control room a

+ Could disable safety equipment l

'1 i s. m ~ *,,

l'dlia

+ Position not indicated in control room l"

fCP&iD Jun

-j

+ Completed August 21,1997 16 a

n i

l ay

Er i

W

.n;

\\

IE#g;kh CC'RRECTIVE ACTIC'N gd

$$$gh 1 %e n :;.

M m

m; r -

e

~ m Key Causa Fac:or m

a

+ Insufficient Physical Barriers - switches that could a

disable the EDG from outside the control room were not adequately protected from inadvertent a

u operation a

a a

e a

a m

?> 1 1

3 g., f5;a ' ';?;, El

',a

'iB T

17

n.

t.

u

fhh CORRECTIVE ACTIC'N nn a

Corrective Ac': ion - Key Casual Factor m

u

+ Protective covers lave been installed over the l

m exposed controls on the EDG-A & B generator a

control panels i

a a

+ Other switches that could disable safety equipment without control room annunciation a

identified a

a

+ Evaluating need for protective covers m; &

im W *i

+ Preliminary results indicate additional covers I

will be installed on Dedicated Shutdown Diesel

'u Generator control pane g

18 p -.

l bfN '

,nln.a,

, E!!,i Q p - -.h fA.a ;)D 3 4. '.9 i

.? $'s Rn % l#,3 i:

D af f g. jls' d'J yTit r,fe L, :##{?l'$$ pi1(*

PROTEC IVE COVER

~

-i

' Y.

,E:

15

{

E t.:

. i.;

4 a~

?

Y' d W4 1

.?

e y

.- s F

s.

g

\\'

i i

• ~ '

3 4

r-es g

g

/.

m.

B E

~

[

,4

'4 l.

l-E n

s 4

g

^

3

}

g

~:k

~

-)

e j,,

g i.

i a m:.. m'.,

iMfp'V/. Jag :j a

t r

.' es. [

F Jr.jg iYf'#{kjd It F

aMq sb

(

.[

?

~

(EPw w %

h ~ Wh 4 @IEA 1

- v!yh 4t,

]9 i

j f-a pr M pi44Vg & u ej 5

,i R M it umna lugpim M,m,M;p$

CORRECTIVE ACTION

~

tawg

m; 1m1 m

Acci~:ional Correc:ive Actions a

a

+ Design control 3rocess revision by 01/15/98 a

ma

+ Engineering expectations issued a

+ Procedures writer's guide revision by 01/15/98 a

+ Operations and Maintenance expectations a

issued a

a

+ Completion of plant labeling initiative in RFO 18 m

m;, #

+ Approximately 8000 labels installed imm$m,1!!)

+ Approximately 4200 labels remain to be

'mfj

"$M]j installed

e,. e m.

~

rue lEd 4

!I$dd., CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

~

E 5"

'~

E

+ Enlancement o'visi3ility of controls 'or high safety significant equipment on local control 8

a panels in RFO 18 m

+ EDG operating and test procedures revised.

a

+ Switches added to Operator Rounds Sheets -

8 shiftly check u

8

+ Event Review Team's findings communicated to a

m site personnel

n ES

IM J.5s!$l

~

4 4

m=:9~#mq91 CORRECTIVE ACTION

~

i ew i

n

n

+:a n-a Ac ci:ional Comments a

a

+ Actions from 03erating experience reviewed a

aa

+ 1993 EDG potentiometer event a

+ Current and proposed actions will a

8 comprehensively address issues a

a a

a

n.,

g

m -

a h

Ufe.l.. J.{4 y 5

in _ m Ih hh

l 4

rx?:4?

l 1

te.....

i; i

y

hShNp, E

lsieuem@:. 1

~

liisd 3

(*W

SUMMARY

REMARKS

m g w;-

l

m a

EDG-B Genera ~:or Ou:aut Breaker Control a

Sw.tch

\\M.is 30sr:ioninc i

e n

(Key factors a

+ Very significant event a

+ Condition not consistent with RNP safety a

culture or performance a

a

+ Evaluate performance initiatives m.

m ia3(m jTL$.,

!s'ik l'khdN A.,

l 23

n c2 n

.J L_

1 4

,, ~ ~k YN,NT N OQ4jil eae w i. w m:. u tg

[E c:g!W31i l

l Mf 4'

SUMMARY

REMARKS

~

m m

n.-

a E JG-3 Genera:or Outaut Breaker Contro a

Switc1 M.isaositioning a

+ Considerations a

+ Improved safety Jerformance at RNP

+ Com 3rehensive corrective actions

+ Actual safety significance of event a

E E

E Lt. ;,p.

24

l L

LIST OF PREDECISIONAL ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE ATTENDEES November 25. 1997 Carolina Power & Liaht Company (CP&L)

W. Orser, Executive Vice President & Chief Nuclear Officer, CP&L J, Keenan, Vice President. H. B, Robinson Plant J. Moyer, Plant General Manager, H, B. Robinson R. Duncan, Hanager, Robinson Engineering Site Support R. Moore, Manager, Outage and scheduling T. Wilkerson, Manager, Regulatory Affairs H. Chernoff Supervisor, Licensing / Regulatory Programs R, Oliver, Supervisor, Probabilistic Safety Analysis T Simonson, Superintendent, Electrical Engineering R. Warden, Manager, Nuclear Assessment Section NRC L. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Region II (RII)

L. Plisco, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects (DRP), RII C. Casto, Deputy Director Division of Reactor Safety (DRS), RII A. Boland, Director, Enforcement and Investigations Coordination Staff (EICS), RII C, Evans, Regional Counsel, RII M. Shymlock, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 4. DRP, RII

• B. Desai, Senior Resident Inspector, Robinson, DRP, RII

• J. Lyons, Director, Directorate II 1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

• D. Trimble, Senior Project Manager NRR, RII J. Zeiler, Resident Inspector, Robinson, DRP, RII L. Watson, Enforcement Specialist, EICS, RII G. McCoy, Project Engineer DRP, RII G. Warnick, Project Engineer DRP, RII M. King, Project Engineer, DRP, RII R. Hagar, Project Engineer, DRP, RII G. MacDonald, Project Engineer, Reactor Projects Branch 4, DRP, RII W. Rogers, Senior Reactor Analyst. RII

• By phone l

!