ML20197B862

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to L Lois 860416 Telcon Re 10CFR50.61 Pressurized Thermal Shock Submittal.Equations & Assumptions Used to Support Submittal,Presented in Greater Detail.Graph Illustrating Flux Reduction Program Encl
ML20197B862
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun 
Issue date: 05/07/1986
From: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Thadani A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
REF-GTECI-A-49, REF-GTECI-RV, TASK-A-49, TASK-OR LIC-86-178, TS-FC-86-286, NUDOCS 8605130166
Download: ML20197B862 (3)


Text

,

Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney OrTlaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402 536 4000 May 7, 1986 TS-FC-86-286 LIC-86-178 Mr. Ashok Thadani, Project Director PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing - B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

References:

(1)

Docket No. 50-285 (2)

Letter LIC-86-024, R. L. Andrews (OPPD) to A. C. Thadani (NRC), January 23, 1986.

(3)

Letter LIC-84-124, W. C. Jones (OPPD) to D. G. Eisenhut (NRC), April 25, 1984.

Dear Mr. Thadani:

Pressurized Thermal Shock Submittal This letter is in response to questions raised by Mr. Lambrose Lois in an April 16 telephone conversation regarding our 10 CFR 50.61 Pressurized Thermal Shock Submittal (Reference 2) for the Fort Calhoun Station.

As requested by Mr. Lois, the equations and assumptions used to support this submittal are presented here, in greater detail.

Table 4 of the original submittal demonstrates that the lower longitudinal weld seams, 3-410, are the most limiting.

The supporting calculations for the 10 CFR 50.61 submittal are based largely on results from the analysis of sur-veillance capsule W-265 (Reference 3), removed after Cycle 7 (5.92 EFPY).

The Combustion Engineering report on this analysis showed a peak vessel I.D.

fluence of 8.8 x 1018 n/cm2 after Cycle 7 and a projected peak End-of-Life fluence of 4.8 x 1019 n/cm2 Since this projection, the peak End-of-Life fluence has been significantly reduced through the implementation of low radial leakage fuel management.

For Cycles 8 and 9, symmetric core loading patterns were utilized while for Cycle 10 an asymmetric core loading pattern with an even greater flux reduction to the critical welds was implemented.

The projections performed for the 10 CFR 50.61 submittal are based on the Cycle 8 pattern which is more limiting than Cycles 9 and 10 and will bound all future cycles.

The attached Cycle 8 flux distribution plot, developed using 00T4.3 calculations, was used to conservatively predict a 30% reduction in 8605130166 860507 PDR ADOCK 05000285

/ h{

P PDR iN\\i \\

is w a o

m,,noem 1,

i m+

\\

Mr. Ashok Thadani May 7, 1986 Page Two the peak fluence at the reactor vessel I.D..

This fluence reduction factor was applied to all remaining cycles, beginning with Cycle 8 and no credit was taken for azimuthal flux distribution or the additional fluence reduction associated with the Cycle 10 asymmetric core loading pattern.

Based on these assumptions, the following EFPY dependent fluence equation was developed:

9 - 8.8 x 1018 + 0.70(EFPY - 5.92)(4.8 x 1019) n/cm2 32 Fort Calhoun is currently licensed for operation through the year 2008. Cycle 10 began January 1986 following 7.93 EFPY of operation. Assuming a 77% capa-city factor beginning in Cycle 10, the projected end of license life was found to be 25 EFPY.

In addition to calculating tluence and the resulting RTPTS

~

for 7.93 EFPY and 25 EFPY, values were also generated for 32 EFPY and 40 EFPY.

The table below displays the fluences obtained by this method and used to support the 10 CFR 50.61 submittal.

PREDICTED REACTOR VESSEL I.D. FLUENCES 9 = 1.09 x 1019 n/cm2 at 7.93 EFPY 9 - 2.88 x 1019 n/cm2 at 25 EFPY 9 - 3.62 x 1019 n/cm2 at 32 EFPY 9 = 4.46 x 1019 n/cm2 at 40 EFPY We hope this information is sufficient to resolve Mr. Lois' questions. We re-main available to supply further information, if necessary.

Sincerely, U

R. L. Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/rh Attachment cc:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 Naw Hampshire Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036 Mr. D. E. Sells, NRC Project Manager Mr. P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector

.'\\

o Q

f f

I.f t

\\

p Q

CC

~

LD O

CQ O

h

~=

H M C3 C D T S

Q Ti

~

E uJ d' i

(

N B

cr a I

s

~~

es Xa @.

~

Yns J

~

Y g

5 zs

.R D 2 2

O E

~'C I a

<h m

C3 u_

O Q

1 Q.

f O

(

w w

a a

a i

=

m m

W W

5 d

d d

~

s e

e e

c b

h L

fffffffff Iffffffff fffffffff IIfffflIf IIIIffIII IIIIIffIl IIIIIfffI fffffffff fffffffff fffffffIf a

o 9

9 N

9 9

N 9

9 o

o o

o o

o o

o o

o m________________

_ _. _ _ _. _ _