ML20196H527
| ML20196H527 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek, 05000000, Crane |
| Issue date: | 03/04/1988 |
| From: | Phyllis Clark GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| C311-88-2016, GL-88-02, GL-88-2, NUDOCS 8803110081 | |
| Download: ML20196H527 (4) | |
Text
'
GPU Nuclear Corporation 4$
g% g 3 ga One Upper Pond Road
'F w w EEu Parsippany, New Jersey o7054 201-316-7000 TELEX 136-482 Writer's Direct Dial Number:
March 4, 1988 C311-88-2016 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comniission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1 (TMI-1)
Operating License No. DFR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS)
Operating License No. DPR-16 Docket No. 50-219 GPU Nuclear Response to Generic Letter 88-02 Enclosed is GPUN's response for the Oyster Creek and TMI-l facility to the ISAP 11 questionnaire forwarded with the Generic Letter 88-02.
Very truly yours,
((
- O d
P. R. C1 ark President PRC/MWL/pa(6423f) cc's on next page A8A3110A81 AAo704 pnp Annry n9nonojo l
l g
nrn
\\
GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsdary of General Puble Utit!es Corporation
~
cc: Mr. William T. Russell, Administrator Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA.
19406 NRC Resident Inspector Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, N.J.
08731 Mr. Alex Dromerick, Jr.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Mr. R. Hernan U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 R. Conte Sr. Resident Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station Middletown, PA 17057-0191 b
b i
6423f
6 Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP II)
Response Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name:
Oyster Creek Utility:
GPU Nuclear Individual Contact Name:
M. W. Laggart Phone Number:
201-316-7968 An expression of interest will not be considered a comitment to participate on the part of the utility.
1.
Would you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time frame?
GPUN needs to better understand the ISAP II program in order to determine whether we will be interested in participating.
2.
Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
Yes 3.
Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the NRC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
GPUN's interest depends on the information gained from the seminar discussed in Question 2.
If such a seminar is not conducted, GPUN would be interested in a one-on-one meeting.
4.
If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
GPUN would require more infonnation concerning cost, manpower impact, acceptance criteria, and acceptable methodologies for PRA applications.
5.
Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP II?
Yes, the integration of ISAP II with the Integrated Living Schedule concept and assurance that the total program costs will not exceed the costs of correcting the problems individually.
6.
Do you have any suggestions for program improvements or changes?
None at this time.
6423f
"A Integrated Safety Assessment Program (ISAP II)
Rosponse Format to Generic Letter 88-02 Facility Name:
TMI-1 Utility:
GPU Nuclear Individual Contact Name:
C. W. Smyth Phone Number:
717-948-8551 An expression of interest will not be considered a comitment to participate on the part of the utility.
1.
Would you be interested in participating in ISAP II? If so, in what time frame?
GPUN needs to better understand the ISAP II program in order to detennine whether we will be interested in participating.
2.
Do you believe that an industry /NRC seminar consisting of a brief discussion by NRC followed by a question and answer period would be beneficial prior to making a decision?
Yes 3.
Would you be interested in a one-on-one meeting with the NRC to discuss your particular facility or facilities?
GPUN's interest depends on the information gained from the seminar discussed in Question 2.
If such a seminar is not conducted, GPUN would be interested in a one-on-one meeting.
4.
If you remain undecided regarding participation, what additional information do you need in order to make a decision?
GPUN would require more information concerning cost, manpower impact, acceptance criteria, and acceptable methodologies for PRA applications.
5.
Do you have any potential concerns about participating in ISAP II?
Yes, the integration of ISAP II with the Integrated Living Schedule concept and assurance that the total program costs will not exceed the costs of correcting the problems individually.
6.
Do you have any suggestions for program improvements or changes?
None at this time 6423f