ML20196B523
| ML20196B523 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1988 |
| From: | Greenman E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8812060286 | |
| Download: ML20196B523 (2) | |
Text
r.
e e
(P E84 UNITED STATES 9
g
$*g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Q.
REGION lli E
ctru ettyn. stunOis sour W 3 0 1988 i
Docket No. 50-341 The Detroit Edison Company ATTN:
B. palph Sylvia Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated April 29, 1988, describing actions taken regarding two allegations concerning SAFETEAM practices and one allegation concerning hiring practices, which were initially reported to the NRC on January 21, 1988, and traasmitted to you in a letter from us dated February 22, 1988 (Allegation RIII-88-A-0011).
Based on the following, we have concluded that your investigations and analyses are appropriate to address each of the three issues.
1.
In regard to the concern that certain tenporary employees were denied the opportunity for an exit interview with SAFETEAM, your investigation detemined that your SAFETEAM interviewer has never
' discouraged anyone from having an interview and you determined that 9 of the 12 contractor personnel released from the department in question during December 1987, had voluntary exit interviews with the SAFETEAM.
In light of the above, the fact that the alleger was not aware of any unreported concerns or problems, and that the SAFETEAM program was a nonregulatory activity, this concern is closed.
2.
In regard to the concern that SAFETEAM investigators had relsased to some plant staff the name of at least one individual that nad provided concerns to them, you stated that the SAFETEAM program's normal practice was to withhold individuals' names from investigators performing the reviews.
You also stated that the concern we provided to you did not contain enough specific information to determine its validity.
Based on your review, the lack of specific infomation, and the nonregulatory aspect of this concern, we consider this issue closed.
g 3 9 ll W
\\
h$vc C fh[*
2 3.
In regard to the_ pre-employment examination waivers concern, you stated that your company policies allow for such waivers.
In addition, during a November 28, 1988 phone call from James McCormick-Barger of my staff to Patricia Anthony of your staff, we were informed that the pre-employment examinations that were waived concerned typing tests and not security / site access-related tests. Based on your response and the nonregulatory aspect of this concern, we consider this issue closed.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter, we have no further questions at this time.
Sincerely, Ew d en a',
irector Division of Reactor Projects Attachments:
- 1. Ltr from NRC to Detroit Edison Co. dtd 2/22/88
- 2. Ltr from Detroit Edison Co. dtd 4/29/88 cc w/ attachments:
Patricia Anthony, Licensing P. A. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department
""DCD/DC8(RIDS)*,
Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Harry H. Voight, Esq.
Michigan Department of Public Health Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness
.