ML20196A619
| ML20196A619 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/16/1988 |
| From: | Bergeron R PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20196A543 | List: |
| References | |
| OL-1, NUDOCS 8806300075 | |
| Download: ML20196A619 (65) | |
Text
r~. -
.O; h't; UNITED STATES OF AKERICA UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION before the ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
)
In the Matter of
)
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
)
Docket Nos.
50-443 OL-1 NEW HAMPSHIRE, et al.
)
50-444 OL-1
)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1
)
(On-site Emergency and 2)
)
Planning Issues)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BERGERON I, RICHARD BERGERON, being on oath, depose and say as follows:
1.
I am the Instrumentation and Controls Engineering Supervisor for New Hampshire Yankee.
A statement of my pratessional qualifications is attached and marked "A".
2.
In my aft:22vits dared May 19, 1988 snd May 26, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as "May 19 affidavit" and "May 26 affidavit"), I described the means used to identify and locate all Seabrook Station RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant under Specification 9763-006-113-19.
This affidavit provides further explanation of that process.
3.
The statement that 126 nonsafety-related RG-58 coaxial cables were identified (May 19 affidavit at 1 6) was based on the materials listed in Attachment B.
The identification of the five common groupings of the 126 RG ?8 coaxial cables (May 19 affidavit at 1 9; May 26 affidavit at 1 3) was based on the materials listed in Attachment C.
The source caterials identified in Attachments B and C are voluminous.
To assist in the h
DO G
~
i s'
understanding of the information provided in this affidavit, the May 19 af fidavit and the May 26 af fidavit,- the pertinent information has been extracted from thase documents and summarized and provided in Attachments D and E.
4.
The 126 nonsafety-related ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable runs were determined by means of a specific sort of the CASP database for Cable Code TA6Y and a review of Seabrook Station electrical schematic drawing packages also for any Cable Code TA6Y applications.
5.
The CASP database is an appropriate means to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications for three reasons.
Fi rs t, CASP is the primary design document for configuration control for electrical cable at Seabrook Station.
Second, CASP has the capability to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications by means of sorting on the Cable Code TA6Y because the RG-58 coaxial cable which was supplied by ITT Surprenant only uses the Design Guide Cable Code TA6Y. Therefore, a sort of the CASP database on the Cable Code TA6Y will identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable applications.
Third, one capability of CASP used at Seabrook Station is to determine the shortest route and length of a cable, given the network of raceways, the origin and destination of cable and taking into consideration applicable design requirements.
This information is then used to install, inspect and maintain the cable.
Accordingly, CASP is subjected to the comprehensive l
design verification and updating process used for any installation document subject to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
This necessarily provides the additional assurances that CA3P agrees with the as-built condition of the plant. l
s.
Y 6.
The Seabrook Station electrical schematic drawing package review is also appropriate to identify ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable runs because these are design basis documents whose input is not derived from CASP and because one can determine the cable applications for a given cable circuit from these documents.
These documents have also been subjected to the m;.ehensive design verification and up-dating process one used for design basis document under 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
Thus, these documents can be relied upon to identif y what cable was used in what applications.
7.
At Seabrook Station the electrical schematic drawings are con-tained in electrical schematic drawing packages.
These packages, in addition to the schematic drawings contain other information such as cable block diagrams.
Thus, a review of the schematic drawings in conjunction with other information contained in that drawing package allows one to identify the esble application (e.g., IIT Surprenant RC-58 coaxial cable) for a specific cable circuit.
8.
Therefore, all ITT Surprenant RC-58 coaxial cable applications at t
t l
Seabrook Station can be determined by review of CACP and the Seabrook Station electrical schematic drawing packages since both are design basis documents which, under 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, are subject to l
quality assurance program requirements governing their issuance and updating.
It should also be noted that the results of the reviews using either method was consistent.
9.
Following the identification of a specific ITT Surprenant AG-58 coaxial cable (i.e., specific cable identification number) the route of each cable was traced by using approximately 36 Seabrook Station cable raceway drawings.
In the case of the independent review l l 1
l* -
ew-.
_._.r---.,,.
fl l'
discussed in the May 19 affidavit at 1 16, the routes were specifically highlighted on a set of these drawings.
10.
In conjunction with tracing the route of an identified RG-58 cable, a review was performed to identify the cable (s) routed with the RG-58 cable (s).
This was done by means of using CASP to identify other cables sharing the raceway with the RG-58 cable (s).
CASP was also used to determine whether the other cable was safety-related (i.e., Class IE) or nonsafety elated (i.e., Non-Class IE).
11.
After identifying a specific RG-58 coaxial cable route, the environmental zones through which each cable traveled was determined using approximately 45 Environment Zone Maps contained in the Service Environment Chart Design Basis Calculation.
The Service Environment Charts were used to identify the applicable environmental parameters for each environmental zone.
See FS AR Figure 3.11(B)-1, Shts 1-5, provided in Attachment G and Excerpt from Environmental Qualification Report provided in Attachment I.
In the case of the independent review assessment discussed in the May 19 affidavit at 1 16 the harsh environment zones were superimposed upon the raceway drawings used in that review.
12.
A review of applicable drawings and documents and related docu-mentation was performed.
This verified that the drawings and documents used in the evaluation reflected the as-built configuration.
13.
Following the review of environmental zones described above (Ref.
1 11) each RG-58 coaxial cable application was then categorized into five common groupings as summarized in Attachment D.
The tabulation provided in Attachment D ider. fies each RG-58 coaxial cable, indicates ahich category it f alls under (e.g., spare, harsh, etc. ) and specifies its function, classification and the environmental zone (s) for each
\\
cable.
In addition, the tabulation refers to a figure which is provided in Attachment E.
14.
The figure provided in Attachment E depicts the routing a given cable follows through the various environmental zones at Seabrook Station and identifies the :uilding and specific environmental zone the cable passes through.
It also indicates whether the cables are inside or outside the nuclear island, and for those cables within the nuclear island whether the zone is harsh or mild.
The process used to develop the information to produce the figures is discussed above at 1 9 and 11.
15.
From the tabulation provided in Attachment D, it is apparent that the 120 nonsafety-related ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cables can be categorized as provided in the May 26 affidavit at 1 3.
16.
The RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant was specified and purchased with a black with red trace jacket color.
See EQF excerpts provided as Attachment F.
As discussed in FSAR Section 8.3.1.3, cables which are colored black with a red tracer signify that the cables are Train A associated.
As discussed in FSAR Section 8.3.1.4, cables which are identified by a black with a red tracer color jacket are nonsafety-related cables.
Further, FSAR Section 8.3.1.4.a also indicates that associated cables are Non-Clase IE circuits.
Finally, FS AR Section 8.3.1.4.k when read in conjunction with FSAR Section 8.3.1.3 indicates that cables with the single solid color of red, white, blue or yellow signify cables which are safety-related or Class IE.
See Attachment G l
for excerpts from above referenced FS AR sections.
Therefore, it is clear from the FSAR that the RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant cannot and does not perform an accident mitigating function (i.e., it is nonsafety-related).
l -
\\
17.
To clarify the usage of the EQF operability code and actual plant applications:
As testified to previously (Transcript excerpts provided as Attachment H), a conservative assumption was made during the initial phase of the Environmental Qualification Program, namely that a given piece of equipment, cable, etc.
was required to perform a safety function.
Accordingly, the ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable was specified, purchased, environmentally q::alified and installed (within the nuclear island) to safety-related requirements. However, it is possible that the EQ File could indicate that the cable is Operability Code A which designates that it is required to perform a safety f unction, but in actuality tne cable is only required to be evaluated to determine if any failures of the cable due to the environment will af fect the accomplishment of a safety function.
This is the case for the RG-58 coaxial cable supplied by ITT Surprenant in that it does not perform any accident mitigating function.
18.
To determine if a given component, cable, etc., is required to be environmentally qualified pursuant to 10 CFR 50.49 one must first determine if the item is within the scope of concern as discussed in 10 CFR 50.49(b) and then determine if the item is not in a mild environment [10 CFR 50.49(c)].
If the item is not within the scope of concern as discussed in 10 CFR 50.49(b) l then the inquiry into the applicability of 10 CFR 50.49 ends.
If the item is I
l within the scope of concern but is in a mild environment then the inquiry I
into the applicability of 10 CFR 50.49 also ends.
In either case 10 CFR 50.49 qualification requirements would not apply.
l 19.
As indicated above none of the 126 RG-58 coaxial cables are safety-related; therefore, none are within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(1).
l l l
1
s 1
20.
Since the RG-58 coaxial cable is nonsafety-related, one then needs to evaluate the applicability of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(2) to a given RG-58 coaxial cable application. As descrioed in FSAR Section 8.3.1.3, Train A associated cables, such as ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable, can be routed with Train A safety-related cables within the nuclear island.
Therefore, all Train A associated cables within the nuclear island are within the scope of concern of 10 CFR 50.49(b)(2).
However, as prdvided above, those cables located in mild environments need not comply with the qualification requirements set forth in 10 CFR 50.49 per 10 CFR 50.49(c).
(See also May 19 affidavit at 1 12).
21.
For those applications outside the nucicar island none were identified where a safety-related cable was being routed 'long with the RG-58 coaxial a
cable outside the nuclear island.
Thus, the postulated failure of an ITT Surprenant RG-58 coaxial cable cannot prevent satisf actory accomplishment of safety functions by safety-related equipment since none of the cables it comes in contact with outside the nuclear island are safety-related (i.e., the failure could only affect another nonsafety-related cable).
Therefore, the RG-58 coaxial cable outside the nuclear island is not "important to safety", the qualification requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 are I
not applicable and further inquiry is not required.
22.
The 12 RG-58 coaxial cables routed within the nuclear island are important to safety because their failure under postulated environmental l
conditions could potentially impair the ability of safety-related equipment to perform its safety function satisfactorily.
These 12 RG-58 l
coaxial cables are in the process of being replaced with already qualified l
RG-59 cable.
l
! 1 l
p
.3 A
23.
As regards to the acceptability of RG-59 coaxial cable for use as a replacement fo; the RG-58 coaxial cables located in a harsh environment, it should be understood that for purposes of environsental qualification, the RG-59 cable's signal transmission characteristics versus those of the RG-58 cable are immaterial because all applications are nonsafety-related.
Rather, the concern is with the cable's ability to withstand the stresses imposed by accident environments and not fail so as to prevent the satisf actory accomplishment of a saf ety f unction.
24.
The EQF for ITT Surprenant RG-59 coaxial cable (File No. 113-19-01),
the Equipment Lis t, the Sumnary Evaluation, the QEW, clearly indicate that the RG-59 coaxial cable is qualified for use in all building environmental zones and for all event codes.
See Attachment F for EQF excerpts.
Accordingly, since there is no environmental qualification related restrictions regarding the usage of RG-59 coaxial cable at Seabrook Station, the cable is qualified for any of the building environmental zones in which the ITT Surprenant cable may be located.
A wm Rrchard Bergeron~
6' f
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE June Ik,1988 Rockingham, ss.
The above-subscribed Richard Bergeron appeared before me and made oath that he had read the foregoing affidavit and that the statements set forth therein are true to the best of his knowledge.
Before me, l
?DawSu CMT11 \\
Beverly E,_Silloway, Notary Qiblic My Commission Expires:
Ma cew 6, 1990
' !!)
)-
q l
l aAa l
l RICHA 3 BERGERON Instrumentation & Controls Engineering Supervisor Education l
BS Marine Engineering, Maine Maritime Academy, May 1969 Mr. Bergeron joined Public Service Company of New Hampshire in May 1982 as Senior I&C Engineer in the Engineering Services Department.
His areas of responsiblity include coordination of I&C Engineering activities for the Station Staff, construction and Startup interface activities, as well as, various special projects.
Mr. Bergeron was recently appointed to the position of Instrumentation &
Control Supervisor in the Engineering Department.
For the past six years Mr. Bergeron has also been assigned as the Station Staff Representative on the Equipment Qualification Task Force.
He has been responsible for the coordination and review of the Equipment Qualification Program, as well as, coordinating the i=plementation of the Station Equipment Qualification Program.
Mr. Bergeren came to Public Service Company of New Ha=pshire from Stone & Webster Ergineering Corporation where he was employed from 1972-1982.
He held the position of Principle Instrument Application Engineer responsible, for P
,,,---e+-,,-
--+ -
i
.k 4
specifying, purchasing and design review of electron and pneumatic instrumentation control systems.
Mr. Bergeron is also experienced in the scheduling and preparation of Logic Diagrams and System Descriptions which define the functional control concepts.
He was also assigned as a task member to assist in the development and preparation of the 79-018 equipment qualification submittal for Duquesne Light Company.
Between 1969 and 1972 was employed by Gulf oil Corporation as an engineer in their Marine Engineering Division.
There he was responsible for the operation and l
.r.aintenance of Marine Power Plants.
l 1
I
ATTACHMENT B SOURCE MATERIALS USED TO IDENTIFY ITT SURPRENANT RG-58 COAXIAL CABLE APPLICATIONS 1.
CASP Data Base;.Speciality Sort for TA6Y Cable Codes 2.
Seabrook Station Electrical Schematic Drawing Packages (164 packages of approxirately 12,000 pages).
DRAWING ID NUMBERS 300933 301913 310106 310872 310952 300934 301914 310107 310874 310953 300935 301915 310108 310875 310955 300936 301916 310177 310882 310956 300937 301917 310178 310887 310957 301010 309702 310179 310890 310958 301012 309703 310180 310891 310961 301015 309709 310181 310894 310962 301016 309709A 310182 310895 310963 301017 309709B 310841 310897 310965 301107 309711 310842 310898 310966 301115 309711A 310843 310899 311864 301211 309712 310844 310900 311865 301212 309712A 310845 310901 311866 301213 309713 310846 310902 311867 301214 309713A 310847 310903 311868 301215 309714 310848 310919 311869 301216 309714A 310849 310920 311870 301221 309716 310850 310921 312020 301506 309716A 310851 310922 312021 301508 309716B 310852 310924 312062 301619 309718 310853 310926 312066 301900 309718A 310854 310927 312067 301901 309720 310855 310928 370008 301902 309720A 310857 310929 301903 309721 310862 310930 301904 309741 310863 310931 301905 309742 310864 310932 301906 309871 310865 310940 301907 309876 310866 310942 301908 310101 310867 310943 301909 310102 310868 310944 301910 310103 310869 310947 301911 310104 310870 310949 301912 310105 310871 310951
E >
ATTACHMENT C SOURCE MATERIALS USED FOR CATEGORIZATION OF RC-58 COAXIAL CABLE APPLICATIONS 1.
CASP Data Base (approximately 3,500 page hard copy equivalent).
2.
CASP Data Base; Speciality Sort for TA6Y Cable Codes 3.
Seabrook Station Cable Raceway Drawings:
Drawing Numbers 301286 - 301293; 309859; 310298; 310335; 310366 - 310371; 310450; 310476; 310478; 310479; 310496 - 310501; 310688; 310796 - 310803.
4.
Service Environment Design Basis Calculation, Calculation Set No. 6.01.00.00 (approximately 61 pages), dated February 2, 1987.
5.
Service Environment Charts; FSAR Figures 3.11(B)-1, Shts. 1-5.
6.
PSNH Letter (SBN-886) dated October 31, 1985, "Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment; SER Outstanding Issue #6,"
J. DeVincentis to G. W. Knighton (Note letter and enclosure distributed to ASLB Service List including NECNP).
Y.
ATTACRMENT D ITT SURPRENANT RG-58 C0 AXIAL CABLE APPLICATIONS CATEGORY-QUANTITY LISTING Sparc RG-58 Coaxial Cable 19 Sheet 1 RG-58' cables routed at least partially through a 12 Sheet 2 harsh environment within the nuclear island RG-58 Cables located in mild environment within 76 Sheets 3 the nuclear island thru 8 RG-58 Cables routed only with other nonsafety-10 Sheet 9 related cables outside the nuclear island RC-58 Cables routed in mild environments within 9
Sheet 10 the nuclear island and routed only with nonsafety-related cables outside the nuclear island Total no. of cables 126 I
l l
I
Sheet 1 of 11 WO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATEGORY FIGURE FUNCTION-CLASSIFICATION 1.
FM4-JX1/2 CB2, CB4, ET2 A, ET4 A, ET3 A, ET3 B Spare Al
- Nonsafety-related 2.
FM7-JX1/2 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Spare Al
- Nonsafety-related 3.
FM3-JW5/2 CB2, CB4, CB10, ET1, PB25, PBil, PB12 Spare A3
- Nonsafety-related 4.
FM6-JW5/2 CB2, CB4, CBIO, ET1, PB25, PBll, PB12 Spare A3
- Nonsafety-related 5.
FM6-JX5/2 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 6.
FM4-JX5/2 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 7.
FM7-GY4/2 CB2, CB4, CB6A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 8.
FM4-GY4/2 CB2, CB4, CB6A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 9.
FE7-FM6/2 CB1, CB2 Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 10.
FM6-GY6/2 CB2, CB4, CB6A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 11.
FM4-GY6/2 CB2, CB4, CB6A Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 12.
FM3-FPl/2 CB2 Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 13.
FM7-FPl/2 CB2 Spare B
- Nonsafety-related 14.
FE7-FM4/2 CR1, CB2 Spare B
- Noasafety-related 15.
FM3-CYO/2 CB2, CB5A, CB4, TB Spare C
- Nonsafety-related 16.
FM7-GYO/2 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Spare C
- Nonsafety-related 17.
F86-G13 CB1, CB4, TB Spare C
- Nonsafety-related 18.
FM3-GY9/2 CB2, CBSA. CB4, TB Spare C
- Nonsafety-related 19.
FM6-GY9/2 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Spare C
- Nonsafety-related
- See Note 1
Sheet 2 of 11 l
NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION i
1.
FM4-JXI CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Ha rsh Al Station Computer Nonsafety-related i
Applications 2.
FM7-JXI CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Ha rsh Al Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 3.
FM4-JX1/1 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Harsh Al Station Computer Nonsafety-related-Applications 4.
FM7-JX1/1 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A, ET3B Harsh Al Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 5.
GU4-Y59/2 PB12, PBll, PB14, PB14A, PB13, PBISC, PBISA Harsh A2 Degasifier Level Nonsafety-related Control 6.
CU4-YS9/4 PB12, PBil, PB14, PB14+., PB13, PB15C, PBISA Harsh A2 Degasifier Level Nonsafety-related Control 7.
CU4-YS9/3 PB12, PB11, PB14, PB14A, PB13, PB15C, PBISA Harsh A2 Degasifier Level Nonsafety-related Control 8.
CU4-Y59/5 PB12, PBll, PS14, PB14A, PB13, PB15C, PB15A Harsh A2 Degasifier Level Nonsafety-related Control 9.
FM3-JWS CB2, CB4, CB10, ET1, PB25, PBil, PB12 Ha rsh A3 Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 10.
FM3-JW5/1 CB2, CB4, CB10, ET1, PB25, PBil, PB12 Harsh A3 Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 11.
FM6-JW5/1 CB2, CB4, CB10, ET1, PB25, PBil, PB12 Harsh A3 Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 12.
FM6-JW5 CB2, CB4, CBIO, ET1, PB25, PBll, PB12 Ha rsh A3 Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications
Sheet 3 of 11 HO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.
FM4-JXS CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 2.
FM6-JX5/1 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 3.
FM6-JX5 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 4.
FM4-JX5/1 CB2, CB4, ET2A, ET4A, ET3A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 5.
FE2-FM4/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 6.
F52-FN1/3 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 7.
F52-FN5/3 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 8.
F72-FNS/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 9.
FM6-GY6/1 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 10.
FE2-FM4/2 Cal, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 11.
F52-FN1/4 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 12.
FS2-FN5/4 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications j
13.
FM6-CY6 C32, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 14.
F52-FN1/5 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
' Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications i
J
Sheet 4 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION-15.
F52-FN5/5 CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 16.
FMO-FT5 CB2, CBI Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 17.
FM4-GY6/1 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications l
18.
FMO-FTS/l CB2, CBI Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 19.
F52-FN1/6 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 20.
V4H-W4J CBlF, CBID Mild B
Station Computer ~ Nonsafety-related Applications 21.
F52-FN5/6 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related -
Applications 22.
F52-FN1/7 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 23.
F52-FN5/7 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 24.
FN4-W4H/3 CB2, CBSA, CBlF Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 25.
F81-FN4 CBl, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 26.
FM3-FPI CB2 Mild B
Station Computer.Nonsafety-related Applications 27.
FN4-W4H/2 CB2, CBSA, CBlF Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 28.
FM7-FP1 CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications
-Sheet 5 of li' NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 29.
FM3-FPl/l CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 30.
FM7-FPl/l CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 31.
F90-FN4/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computar Nonsafety-related Applications 32.
F10-FMO CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 33.
F90-FN4/1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 34.
FS2-FMS CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 35.
F72-FN5 CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 36.
F52-FNL CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related.
Applications 37.
F31-FN1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 38.
F31-FNS CBI, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 39.
FE7-FM6 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 40.
FM4-CY4 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 41.
FE2-FM6 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 42.
FM7-CY4 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications
Sheet 6 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 43.
FE7-FM6/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 44.
FE2-FM6/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 45.
F61-FN1/1 CB1, CB4, CB5t., CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 46.
FM7-GY4/1 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 47.
F61-FN1/3 CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 48.
FC2-FM6/2 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 49.
F61-FN1/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Starion Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 50.
F40-FN5/1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 51.
FN4-U411 CB2, CBSA, CBlF Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 52.
F40-FNS/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related f
Applications 53.
FM4-GY4/1 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 54.
FN4-W411/1 CB2, CB5A, CBIF Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 55.
FMO-FTS/2 CB2, CBI Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 56.
W411-W4J/2 CBIF, CBID Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications J
Shast 7 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATEGORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 57.
FMO-FTS/3 CB2, CBI Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 58.
W411-W4J/1 CBlF, CBID Mild B
Station Computer. ' Nonsafety-related Applications 59.
F90-FN4 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 60.
W4H-W4J/3 CBlF, CBlD Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 61.
F10-FM0/1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 62.
F40-FNS CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 63.
F10-FM0/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 64.
F52-FN1/1 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Ststion Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 65.
F52-FN5/1 CB1, CB4, CB5A, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 66.
F31-FN1/1 CB1, CB4, LBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 67.
F61-FN1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 68.
FM4-GY6 CB2, CB4, CB6A Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 69.
F10-FM0/3 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 70.
FE7-FM4 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications
- 4.-
s Shiet 8 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 71.
PS2-FN1/2 CB1, CB4, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-relate'd Applications 72.
F52-FN5/2 CBI, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild-B Station Computer Nonsafety-related.
Applications 73.
FE2-FM4 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 74.
F72-FN5/1 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 75.
F31-FN1/2 CB1, CB4, CBSA, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer ~ Nonsafety-related Applications 76.
FE7-FM4/1 CB1, CB2 Mild B
Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications
Sheet 9 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATEGORY FIGURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION 1.
G7S-R3J/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-1988 Level Control 2.
G7S-R3G WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-198A Level Control 3.
G7S-R3J WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafety-related TK-198B Level Control 4.
C7S-R3L/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Concentrate Nonsafety-related Bottoms TK-200 Level Control 5.
G67-Ztt3/2 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 6.
G67-ZM3/3 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 7.
C67-ZM3/4 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nonsafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 8.
G67-ZM3/3 WPB Note 2 D Primary Drains Nousafety-related Tank Degasifier TK-67 Level Control 9.
G7S-R3G/1 WPB Note 2 D Waste Feed Nonsafecy-related TV -198A Level C)ntrol 10.
C7S-R3L WPB Note 2 D Laste Concentrate Nonsafety-related fattoms TK-200
,evel Control
V
' s Sheet 10 of 11 NO.
CABLE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ZONES CATECORY FICURE FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION i
1.
FM3-GY9 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 2.
FM3-GY9/1 CB2, CB5A, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 3.
FM6-GY9/1 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 4.
FM6-GY9 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 5.
FM3-GYO CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 6.
FMI-CYO CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C'
Station Computer Nonsa f e ty-re late d Applications 7.
FM3-CYo/1 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 8.
FM7-CYO/1 CB2, CBSA, CB4, TB Note 3 C Station Computer Nonsafety-related Applications 9.
F86-S3W CB1, CB4, TB Note 3 C Cenerator Hydro-Nonsafety-related gen Core Cooling Monitor
.9
- [ D Sheet ll of 11 MOTES:
1.'
Routing of spares through environmental zanes is as shown in referenced figure, however, the cable is not connected to any devices as the figure depicts.
2.
RC-58 cables routed outside nuclear island only with other nonsafety-related cables.
l 3.
RC-58 cables routed in mild environments within the nuclear island and routed only with nonsafety-related I
cables outside the nuclear island.
j i
LEGEND / KEY i
Category Column Spare - Spare RG-58 Cables 1
!!arsh - RC-58 Cabien roated at least partially through a harsh environment within the nuclear island Mild
- RC-58 Cables located in mild environ nents within the nuclear island Functions Column Station Computer - All Seabrook Station Plat.t Computer /pplic.itions, i.e., connections between main frase and computer peripheral connections between computer peripheralt-etc.
Environmental Zones TO - Turbine Building outside nuclear island WPB - Waste Processing Building outside nuclear "sland i
i i
SA ATTACHMENT E ITT SURPRENANT RG-58 C0AXI AL CABLE APPLICATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL ZONE ROUTINGS CONTENTS Figure Al Figure A2 Figure A3 Figure B Figure C Figure D e
CB-2 QU Legend t,
S.
LD SC-Station Computer Applications Cable Quantities-4 Rctive,2 Spare SC b
(
ET-2R
(
ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "R"
(
EL. D' MILD huwww mwwms-CB-4 h
CUNTROLUtilG k
- u. so-suo q
ET-4R ET-3R k
ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "R" ELECTRICRL TUNNEL "R" k
EL. D' MILD EL. D' MtLD 4\\hwwm%
(mwmmv twww' AwmmN 4
4
%s b
St ET-3B ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "B" EL.-26' HARSH
1 i
FIGURE H2 j
Legend j
PB-12 PB-11 DGSFR PNL-Degasifier Control Panel i
PHB EL. 25' PRB EL.25' DGSFR TERM B0H-Degasifier Level
)
HHRSH tlRRSH Termination Box l
Cable Quantities-4Hctive l
DGSFH mymmsmy PNL N
i 1
N N
I N
D Q
PB-14R PB-13 I
k PHB EL. 7' PHB EL. 7' k
HARSH HARSH NN h m m %(Nm m m m m mV nam \\m'\\
l N
i PP-14 k
PHB it. 7' k
I HARSH kN DGSFR k
j TERM
*"'M * *\\
BOX PB-15R PB-150 J;
PRB EL. 7' PH B EL. 7' HRG0H HRRSM 1
j
- l l
l F1GliRE_fl1 Legend SC-Station Computer Applications Cable Quantities-4Rctive,2 Spare n
1 08-2 CONTROL BLUG FL. 75* MILD i
SC m
j i R i
s i
s
\\
Co-a k
s l
CilNIHOL BLDG Q tt. 50-q MILD (tt d
4 4
tv -wwww
.mmuw-
-wmww
<mf sc l
CB-io CONTROL BLDG ET-1 PB-25 PB-11 EL. 21'6 PB-12 MILG 1RRY CHASE PAB EL.25' PRB EL.25' PRB EL. 25' EL. 30'8" HARSH HRRSH HARSH
1
.l 1
1 i
Figure B j
Legend CB-1 EB-2,CB-10,CB-1 F SC-Station Computer Hpplications 0
Cable Quantities-76 Active,10 Spare i
EINTHOL BLDG
[1. 75' MILD St SC
-~r
-: s-s -
l
's N N
. s l
\\ }*
N T T' s
j s
l, s
ET-2R s-s s
I N
ELECTRICRL TUNNEL "H" s.,, u, sc
)
EL. D' MILD 1
s 1
's s sNNNss\\NNs\\NNNNNg 08-4,00-5 A
(
l CONIBOL BLDG D
s N
EL. 50' MILD N
~
s N
s N
ET-48 ET-3H i
x mursamsm axim maammmmma N
i Q
Q ELECTRICHL TUNNEL "H" ELECTRICAL TUNNEL "H" 2
k EL. D' MILD EL.3' MILD s
N hmsms smsmmmsmm' wmsl SC
-' 08-6H I
CONTROL BLOG EL. 21'6" MILD l
ELG_UREl Legend SC-Station Computer applications MCB-Main Control Board Gen Mon-Generator Hydrogen Core Cooling Monitor Cable Quantities-9 Active, S Spare 7
I E
ll:
CB-2 08-1 l
CONTHOL BLDG CONTROL BLDG EL.?S' MILD EL. 75' MILD h.
l:
l=
SC MCB ll 2
2 l -
2 I
' n l
I I
l" GEN
+i mmmm m
MON
' n
'n hsmms 6msmmmmhm<
$C CB-SH CB-4 i
ll CONTHOL BLDG CONTROL BLDG EL. 50' MILD EL.50' MILD l
TURBINE BLDG I
l OUTSIDE NUCLEAR INSIDE NUCLEAR i
{l ISLRND
-ISLAND l
P j
Legend 1
FIGURE D WS INST RK-Waste Solids System
]
Instrument Rack 4
WST TK LUL-Waste Feed Tank Level BRS SYS-Baron Recovery System Contrui Panel
]
IURSTE PROCESS BISS BRS TERM B0H-Primary Drains Tank EL. 53'0" SOUTH Degasifier Level Control Tennination BoH IUST TK Cable Quantities-10 Rctive I
WS INST LUL i
ssss RK i
IURSTE PROCESS BLDG l
EL. 25' NORTH BRS SYS l
i s
/
l BRS TERM B0H l
IURSTE PROCESS BLDG EL.13' DUTSIDE NUCLERR ISLRND j
.- j,
r.
4 ATTACHMENT F EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION FILE NO. 113-19-01 EXCERPTS CONTENTS Tlarsh Environment Equipment List Equipment Summary Evaluation (p. I of 1)
Qualification Evaluation Work Sheet - 11/05/86 Appendix A, Spec. No.~ 9763-006-113-19, Pg. No. Al UE&C Purchase Order, EQF Ref. 7,-pgs. 1 & 2 of 4 I
~
t
\\
/
paonv.rnce EC $H $n oCr.HpPm.a&O>"ROD a
1" 6He
- - Q4-N0o~
n
- ~
Ae<M= ROP n
8 1
2 O
O 3
6 8
- M
/
T 0
NE D
. L 3
2 E
6 4
/
VO
. L 7
0 O EC A
9 0
t G.
E RE V
T E O w
L a
PO A
D R
D OC T
C N
U F
Y T
E F
R A
w S
P E
R O
N 8
0 I
E H
L 99 I O 1 1 FN
. 33 P
OO 1
1 EP 1 1 M
A N
H O E
4 I
w i 2
?-
E A
L
. L N
T A
S F
T O
M I
1 0
O N 9
E E
O O R
N 8
E A
C R
3 2
X U
E 1
I B
I T O
/.
CN V
A E
A P
F L
$L R
E UE
- X E
5 O.
ND T -
IF E
s i
C F.
D S
I O N L
E E
C K
e I
RT L
A N
u ME E
E M
C RU e
I RE V
T L R
.NA y
E s
S I C p
a r
9 p
g O
O 6
D
(
3 I
f I
f N H T
S N
f M
E L
N M
H O
P
. C R
S I
J 3
O t
E f
O N
D I
(
E ON e
p s
T p
R a
H O V
4 S
1 O 0
RN 0
I1 4];
,i
- 4 1 il l
l n
\\'
,l il l)iflllll l
l 1
l l
l l
lI l
ll l
Electrical Equipment Qualification File No. 113-19-01 Revision 2 g
EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
EHLUATION 1.0 Description The equipment under evaluation is the Coaxial and Triaxial Instrument Cable manufactured by ITT Surprenant Division.
i This cable is located in all areas of the plant, both inside and outside containment, and will be evaluated for the worst case postulated environe'nt conditions inside containment.
The traceability of tne test documentation to the cable supplied by ITT for UE&C Specification 9763-006-113-19 is provided in reference 4, 2.0 Conclusion This equipment is qualified by sequential test for the postulated accident temperature, pressure, humidity, enemical spray and radiation dose and by test supplemented by analysis for the required operating time.
This equipment has a qualified life of 40 years at 167'F (75'C).
Therefore, this equipment is qualified to the requirements of NUREG-0588, Category I.
I 3.0 Limita tions None.
4.0 Discussion Two specimens are tested in Reference 2.
These specimens are RG-ll/U and RG-59/U coaxial.
Reference 4 states that these two
)
specimens are representative of the four different types of cables supplied to Seabrook as per Reference 1.
The supplied cables are RG-11 triaxial, and RG-ll, RG-58 and RG-59 coaxial.
The insulation in these cables is cross-linked polyethylene with an Exane jacket.
The limiting Environmental Zones for 2
radiation are PB-15A, P8-4, P8-18 and P8-19.
There is no Class 1E Electrical Equipment is Zones P8-4 and PB-19 (Reference 8).
The qualified life of the cable in Zones P8-15A and P8-18 (Radiation TIO 200 Mrads) is limited to 33.20 years.
All margins suggested by IEEE 323-1974 nave been e et.
A vertical tray flame test nas been conducted in accordance with Section 2.5 of IEEE Standard Item 5).
383-1974 (Reference 3, p.
2.
)
5168m Page 1 of 1
d gg g
,pany of New Nmpshi re QUALIFICATION 4TICN IJORK SHEE T g
p,$,7 4
-443 Prepared By:fdd/
'M h f,[
[QUIPMENT QUALIFICATION FILE NO.113-19-01 Checked By:
h M,c.
l f uqcent
/
Date: Mf(,
Postulated Ensironment l
Des (ription Parameter J
l l rt haw Orde r No..
Va lue _
Reference Qualified Environment J
Value Qualift(ation J
9763-006-113-19 L
Opera ting i
Method Outstandino l Reference l
1 items l
Isme i
1 Year 3
1 [quipment ID No(s).
'l i
E D1 -CBL-6 l
- p. 1 I Year Test and
- p. 2 Analysis
' None l
l 5
1 l
1 Peak 1
Tempera ture 375 2
l (DF)
- p. 1 390
- p. 11 Test l
J Nonc l
Peak Iquipn.ent I,pe:
ll Pressure 60 l
- p. !
l 113
- p. Il
)
Test i
I I
In s t a tswn t t.able 11 (Psig) l l
l l
2 ll None il 1
l Nnuf u t urer :
ll Relative l
I I
111 Suprenant ll Humidity J
100 i
i 1
l l
2 1
0 j
l ll (1)
- p. 1 l
100 l
- p. 10
' Test ModeI Numtes:
ll
{
l
' None FG-Il triamial. RG-II, I
P.G-58 & ftG-59 Coazia l l
Cnemical Boric Acid I
1 i Boric Acid l
2 i
Spray (pH) 1.2% by wt.
O
- p. I 1,71 by wt.
1
- p. 10 l Iest None i
pH 7.5 to 10.5 l Au ura t y : Spe( : N/A ll l
l pH 10.5 6
Demon: N/A ll 70 Year Norina l I i
1 Radiation Dose 2.0 x 108 1
(R
- p. 3 I.66 x 108 i
I Year] ads Note 1 2
Accident (Note 1) t 1is. sting Invironment.
Radiation Dose
- p. 3 I
- p. C-2 Test None f
Location: Con t a innat n t l
I s,
(All Jones) 11 Aging
)
167/40 1
3 167/40 3
lTestand I
Rrd lone: Prisiae y Aum.
ll (OF/ Years)
(7500)
I Bldg. (PB-ISA, PB-IB) lJ Note 1
- p. 2 (750C)
- p. 2 i Analysis None I
4 (Note 1)
Lotvest [levat son: Note 2 i
flood level: Note 2 l'
Sutane rgen(e N/A Note 8 N/A N/A l
N/A None l
l Above flood level: Note 2
\\
umentrt ton Re ferences:
Ul &C Drawing No. 9763-I-300219 Notes:
Revision 19, Serv (e Environmental Chart FP-33262-02, FIPL Report No. F-AS%0-8, Qualification Tests of Electrical Cables 9/Z5/H6 1.
t re a Simul ted Steam Line Break and Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Environment.1/14/83 The limiting zones for radiation are P8-15A VU-30454 I!1 to Uf&C S/23/82 and PB-18.
Zones PB-4 and PB-19 are excluded Ut&C 5petst (ation No. 9763-006-113-19, Sec. f or Specialty Cable 9/20/82.
in these areas, (Reference 7).
The qualified 2 k
sir.ce no electrical equipment is installed Impell Calt u14 tion No. 070-032-002.
5eabrook I.O. Itle No. 113-19-01, life of the (able (triadiated to 1.f.f> Mrads) 58:f-92605. Uf 8C's is tter to Impell, dated 2/13/85.Assesssynt Checklist, Note 11.
in these zones is limited to 33.20 years.
5B0-90263, UI&C tetter. "f looding Study N trim."
Sutcergence qualification is not required I
2.
Impell tetter (Referen(e 9).
1 Sutmerged as a Result of Design Basis Events.No. 0570-032-NY-156, dated 2/2/86 Sursnary of Class IE Equipment si
'l v
)
t APPEND 11 A l
[
BILL OF MATERIAL SEABROOK STATION UNITS 1 & 2 SPECIALTY CABLE (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10) j HINIMUN TYPE OVERALL CONDUCTOR SHIELD PURCHASE ITEM CABLE CABLE CONDUCTOR JACKET SIZE AWG NUMBER TYPE ORDER QTY-CABLE NO.
VOLTACE (FUNCTION)
COLOR COLOR (STRAND)
CONDUCTORS (COVERACE)
FEET CODE l
l 1.
2500 vde Triaxial N/A Red
- 18 (7x) 1 Braid 25,000 UAlf (901 Min.)
(RG-II, 2.
2500 vde Triaxial N/A White
- 18 (7x) 1 Braid 25,000
-UA2T (901 Min.)
(RG-II, i
3.
2500 vdc Trianial N/A Blue
- 18 (7x) 1 Braid 7,000 UA3T (901 Min.)
(RC-II, 4.
2500 vde Triaxial N/A Yellow
- 18 (7x) 1 Braid 7,000 41A4T (931 Min.)
(RC-II, 5.
2500 vde Triamial N/A Black With i18 (7x) 1 3 raid 60,000 UA67 (90Z Hin.)
(RG-II, Red Trace 6.
2500 vdc Coaxial N/A Black With
- 18 (7x) 1 Braid 5,000 TA6T (901 Min.)
l
~,
(RC-II, Red Trace
- h" g 7.
1000 vac Coaxial N/A Black With
- 21 (19x) 1 Braid 60,000 TA6Y-(90% Hin.)
'* g g j (RC-58, Red Trace
- E 8.
1000 vac Coaxial N/A Red
- 24 (7x) 1 Braid 5,000 1NttY (95Z Min.)
,,2ogp (RG-59,
~.,
p 9.
1000 vac Coaxial N/A White
- 24 (7x) 1 Braid 5,000 TA2Y (951 Mi.)
(RG-59, N$
10.
1000 vac Coaxial N/A Black With
- 24 (7x) 1 Braid 5,000 TA6U (95% Min.)
l T,
(RC-59, Red Trace TD 8
<9 j
l')
s.sl.
"l' e
s.
g
'N 9
4
(-
., f ' )
4
\\
C?C ll 5 -l " -C h t$ l v
I t
'rauRCHASE ORDER s
orn 443 3 t e e.ote =vuo.t.e uust
... te a on invoicts,. cos...mo t.s
~o.c.c.icti.
tsa =ot%ct.
m,,,n,,cws.ncen neem ACCr No.
1 a cor SNH-744 cart Oc:cber 7, 198:
P. O. NO. 9 76 3.006-113-;
c.oi,;.; 5fAV.Gi. G;M.FAH di NEW M.MPS'd!AI. et al
,,,,,",,,,,1,;*,,,"*,,',",'**'*"'
c/o United Engineers & Constructors Inc. Agents u..ign
=c;. css: a c:.stese?:es sic.
Post Office Box 700 post Offhe Sox 700 Seabrook. New Ra=oshire 03874 PURCHASER Seabrook. New Maneshire 02!
au ::eetiec.et.c a..o
- ., :, s......
]81,1 e f ;
IT*-Suprenant Division v"rio t ci.'ite's'*a ::.S'rew%st it.c. r ec
'S "o
'c s
st Gs erces.
=
.ie ~o 13819 172 Sterling Stree:
- o. son un
.n..a.
cast. wasacta - o. tit ii
,, 3 av Clinton. Massachusetts 01510 SELLER a rr g::. =
cy p e v g.
G.W.Mo rris ssip Via CONSIGN TO Puolic Serr ce Conpany of New Hanpsa:.:
Motor Freight c/o United Engineers & Constructors I:
5eabrook Station 1., g,3 (;g)j Seabrook, New Hangshi = 03874 TERMS net thir:v (30) davs.
ceco 9/21/82
....,,...,............. i.....................................,,,....,,,............
a.,.....
s....,.
- o....... s...,....................
- ano 87 av
,s....,
, M. 0,, }
w' t,
hw mo.1 o E se al Pflo N l
P.ic t su nNisa e o.a.
Job Site.
g' Design, furnish, f abricate, test and deliver 1 lot of Special Cable
{
in accordance with the following documents:
A.
Specification No. 9763.006-113-19, dated Septe ber 20, 1982 consisting of Cover Page, Table of Contents, nineteen (19) reproduced typewritten pages Figure 1, three (3) pages of Appendix A, and three (3) pages of Appendix 3, attached hereto and nada a part hereof.
3.
Specification No. 9763-QAS-3, Quality Assurance Adninistrative and Systen Require =ents For Saf ety Related Electrical Equipnent. Revision 7, l
dated April 11, 1979, consisting of Cover Table of Contents, Curren: Page Liating Identification of Changes, and thirty-nine (39) reproduced type-
, wri::en pages, already in yor.r possession and nada a part hereof.
C.
Specification No. 9 753-EQ-1, Class IE Equip =ent Qualification Requirenen:s.
Revision 7, dated February 19, 1976, consi. sting of Cover, Table of I
! Contents, can (10) reproduced typewri :en pages and Data to be subni::ed
! vith Proposal, consisting of two (2) reproduced typewri::en pages, nu=bered D1 and 32, already in your possession and nada a par: hereof.
1 ?R CING:
i TOTAL 7:.KM D"!7ERED PR:03.
. $130,365.0
EI"EN S IC'i_
L.
25,000 ft.
CAi! Triax RG-11 Red
$810.00 S 20,250.00 2.
25,000 ft.
CA2T Triax RC-11 Whi:e
$810.00 S 20,250.00 3.
7,000 ft.
UA3T Triax RC-11 Blue
$810.00
$ 5,670.00 l
4 7,000 fc.
UA4T Triax E0-11 Tellov
$810.00
$ 5,670.00
()
5.
60,000 ft.
CA6 Triax RG-11 Black / Red $810.00
$ 48,600.00 Continued
........ -......... ~.
.......n
...in
-.."e-u.n-e-d '.
i PURCHASE ORDER Tors 4th tat o.ote =vusta wust a..o a or.ted engineers
- ~,'.=*!.',Jf"'n.?an-tnt
,cc
.s c,.
svs,c.:rs m sNH-744 CAFE October 7. 198I P. C. NO.9 763.006-113 w...
pi,,3L:C SERVICE COMPANY OF NE*.J HAMPSHIRE et al v.....................
c/o United Engineers & Construe:ces Inc. Agents uairts t=catus a censrawetens inc.
PUP HASER es
..o a ::,, e, s..
.a.co::s.tl*ca.ct =C fale I O I""*-Supranant Division p
.o e ca.=q tists inust et sin e
Whif t0 teGinates & C04sf RVticAs i4C.
P 3.1018 2 2 3 P olt.. P a.
'Ig No OAst wahact a. s.13 t 2 ggttgg a f f e t. m CCbal
.t3 ST SHIP VIA CONSIGN TO rERMS
...i.........,.......-...,..............ei.
.., i.........
...a e.e t o s.u..
a....i..
n...
..n
- a.....
s....,................o...-...s....................r.........,.a f,.s...-.........,
e..co sv
..n
.a
..,.....i...n...
...n
....t..
...au..
......e t...
spt#
e.......i
.e
...g.i.
oESC=I*f8oN l
P.ic t At no t wwws I IM gU, ANT!*Y DES CRI?* ION PRICI/MFT LT"ENSION 6.
10,000 ft.
TA6T Coax RG-11 Black / Red $755.00
$ 7.550.00 7.
60,000 f:. TA6Y Coax RG-58 Black / Red $250.00
$ 15,000.00 8.
5,000 ft.
TA1Y Coax RG-59 Red
$225.00
$ 1.125.00 9.
5,000 ft.
- A2Y Coax RG-59 'htte
$225.00
$ 1,125.00 10.
5,000 ft.
TA6U Coax RG-59 Black / Red $225.00
$ 1,125.00 Pre =ium Price - Vsndor to expedite delivery to October 8, 1982.
ITEM QUAN !*T DES CRI?* ION PREK!tM 5.
25,000 ft.
CA6T Triax RG-11 Black / Red S 4,000.00 Prices are firm for delivery through January 14, 1983.
i iIlv.S 0F PAT'{Ih"!:
1" ten (10)/ no: thir y (30) days.
i SPEC:X., CONDITIONS - Fors No. 9763-4224 Revised May 20, 1981 consis ting i of Cover Page, *able of Contents and :venty (20) reproduced typewrt::en pages is attached hereto and made a par: hereof.
cat:RA'r:IE:
in accort.ance vi:h Article 9 of Special Conditions Fors 9*63-4224 for a period of one (1) year f rom date of co==arcial operatica.
i ?do (2) unpri:ed copies of outside Purchase Orders are to be sub=1::ed to the attention of Mr. D. E. McCaig,. tanager - Expediting, h
l Mcuthly progress charts outlining engineering, purchasing, produe:1on and delivery status vill be sub=1::ed starting August 23, 1982.
Continu
~ -
,>/4
r m.; -.,
ATTACHMENT G EXCERPTS FROM FS AR CONTENTS FSAR Pg. 8.3-39 8.3-40 8.3-40a 8.3-41 8.3-52 8.3-53 8.3-54 FSAR Fig. 3.11(B)-1, Sh. 1
-1, Sh. 2
-1, Sh. 3
-1, Sh. 4
-1, Sh. 5
SB 1 & 2 Am:ndmsnt 55 FSAR July 1985
+
8.3.1.3 Physical Identification of Safety-Related Equipment All cables, raceways and safety-related equipment are assigned to a particular channel or train.
There are two redundant trains of power and controls, and four redundant channels of instrumentation.
Each channel or train is assigned a particular color, as shown below:
Equipment Raceway Separation Group Nameplate Tag Cable Color A.
Channel I and Train A Red Red Red Train A Associated Black Black w/ Red Tracer l
B.
Channel II and Train B White White White Train B Associated Black Black w/ White Tracer. l
'U C.
Channel III Blue Blue Blue D.
Channel IV Yellow Yellow Yellow it Each piece of electrical equipment is marked with the node number indicated on the design drawings, in the particular color corresponding to the channel or train to which that equipment is assigned.
Similarly, trays and exposed conduits are marked with color-coded markers. The cable jacket color code serves as its identification. The operator or maintenance craftsman needs only to observe the color of the nameplate of any piece of equipment or the serves.
For cable jacket color to determine which channel or train it exceptions to the above cable and raceway identification criteria, see Subsection 8.3.1.4.k.
ff 8.3.1.4 Independence of Redundant Systems 1
a.
General The Seabrook Station comp'.ies with the requirements of FSAR Appendix SA, IEEE 384-1974 and Regulatory Guide 1.75, Rev. 2.
These documents describe acceptable methods of complying with IEEE t
279-1971 and Criteria 3, 17 and 21 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 f
with respect to the physical independence of the circuits and j
electrical equipment comprising or associated with the Class IE l
power system, the protection system, systems actuated or controlled by the protection system, and auxiliary or supporting systems that i
must be operable for the protection system and the systems it actuates to perform their safety-related functions.
Preservation of independence of redundant systems within the control boards and all other field mounted racks is discussed in Subsection 7.1.2.2.
52.
l 8.3-39
s, SF, 1 & 3 Amendment 59 FSAR May 1986 8.3.1.4 Independence of Redundant Systems a.
General The Seabrook Station complies with the requirements of FSAR Appendix 8A, IEEE 384-1974 and Regulatory Guide 1.75, Rev. 2.
These documents describe acceptable methods.of complying with IEEE 279-1971 and Criteria 3, 17 and 21 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 with respect to the physical independence of the circuits and electrical equipment comprising or associated with the Class IE power system, the protection system, systems actuated or controlled by the protection system, and auxiliary or supporting systems that must be operable for the protection system and the systems it actuates to perform their safety-related functions. Preservation of independence of redundant systems within the control boards and all other field mounted racks is discussed in Subsection 7.1.2.2.
In accordance s ~;5 the provisions of Section 4.Sa and 4.6.2 of FSAR Appendix 8A, Sections 4.5(1) and 4.6.1 cf IEEE 384-1974, and Position C4 of Regulatory Guide 1.75, Revision 2, we have elected to associate all of the Non-Class 1E circuits with Class lE circuits. This application of associated circuits allows the plant to be designed with one less separation group; that is, instead of having five separation groups consisting of four safety-related separation groups and one non-safety-related separation group, Seabrook has only four separation groups. The major advantages of this approach are the ability to provide greater separation distances between the groups, as well as to reduce the raceway syste,m's exposure to fire'.
As a result of this design, all plant circuits are specifically assigned to one of the following four separation groups as noted in Figure 8.3-57 :
Group A - Train A, Channel I and Train A Associated Circuits Group B - Train B, Channel II and Train B Associated Circuits Group C - Channel III Group D - Channel IV The great majority of associated circuits are with Group A, a very limited number are with Group B, and none are with Groups C and D.
The circuits that are associated with Train A consist of:
1)
Non-Class 1E power, control, instrument circuits contained within the Nuclear Island.
2)
Non-Class 1E power, control, and instrumentation circuits that traverse the Nuclear Island boundary.
3)
Mon-Class IE power, control, and instrument circuits outside the Nuclear Island.
47 52 8.3-40
SB 1 & 2 Amendmsnt 59 FSAR May 1986 The circuits that are associated with Train B consist of:
1)
Non-Class lE power,. control, and instrument circuits contained within the Nuclear Island.
2)
Non-Class IE power, control, and instrumentation circuits that traverse the Nuclear Island boundary.
47 The Nuclear Island boundary is shown in Figure 8.3-58.
This figure denotes the buildings, structures, duct banks, etc., which are part of the Nuclear Island. All other buildings, structures, etc.,
are considered to be outside the Nuclear Island.
St The four separation groups are routed through four separate raceway systems per the separation criteria given in Table 8.3-10.
This separation criteria are based on a combination of the following:
1)
Standard separation criteria given in Sections 5.1.3, 5.1.4, and 5.6 of FSAR Appendix 8A and IEEE 384-1974 and 2)
Separation criteria established by analysis and testing as permitted aby Sections 5.1.1.2 and 5.6 of FSAR Appendix 8A and IEEE 384-1974.
This analysis and testing are documented in References (a) and (2) (see FSAR Secicon 8.3.4).
59 l
l l
l t
- 8. 3 -40 a i
l
h *bl V c.
SB 1 & 2 Amendment 52 FSAR December 1983 The following analysis examines the design features and modes of failure of associated circuits of each separation group to determine any interaction and challenges with other separation groups. The overall objective is to assure that the ability to achieve a safe plant shutdown under design basis event (DBE) conditions is not compromised.
b.
Train A Associated Circuit Analysis 1.
Associated Circuits Contained within the Nuclear Island Non-Class IE circuits that remain within the Nuclear Island are permitted to share the same raceway as Train A Class IE circuits. These circuits are classified as Train A Associated Circuits and are designed and installed to meet all the require-ments placed on associated circuits as required by the compli-ance documents listed earlier.
Challenges to Class IE circuits, becausu of failure in an associated circuit, have been examined and determined to have no detrimental effect because:
(a) When Class 1E power supplies are utilized, failure of a Non-Class lE motor, load, or device connected to this power supply will be promptly isolated by operation of Class IE protective devices.
Non-Class IE loads connected to Class lE buses are in all cases protected by Class 1E devices. The breakers protecting Non-Class lE loads are coordinated such that failure of all Non-Class lE loads, with proper operation of their own breakers, will not result in tripping of the incoming breaker to the bus.
Further, in the few cases where credit is taken for the incoming bus feeder breaker to provide backup protection to meet Regulatory Guide 1.63, the associated bus is dedicated to Non-Class IE loads only and, therefore, will not degrade a Class 1E bus.
(b)
In cases where Non-Class IE power supplies, such as switchgear, motor control centers, and distribution panels are utilized, these are of identical design of the Class 1E counterparts and have been purchased to the same specification requirements inclusive of quality control. Mounting of the Non-Class 1E power supplies within the Nuclear Island is identical to the mounting of their Class 1E counterparts; therefore, credit can be taken for this equipment to function under DBE conditions.
52 l
8.3-41 l
SB l & 2 Amsndment $6 FSAR November 1985 Penetrations for 600 volt service and below are modular type with a header plate welded to the outside of a 12 inch containment sleeve.
Because of the concern regarding leakage currents of terminal blocks during accident conditions, low level instrumentation circuit con-ductors inside containment are connected to the penetration conductors with qualified splices.
Safety-related 480 volt power, 120 volt ac and 125 volt de control circuit conductors inside containment required to function for LOCA and main steam line break conditions are also connected to the penetration conductors with qualified splices.
The balance of medium power 480 velt conductors, and control and instrumentation conductors are terminated on terminal Sa blocks inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment.
480 volt heavy power conductors are terminaved with lugs on special termination plates inside terminal boxes bot h inside and outside containment. Nuclear instrumentation detector circuits are termi-nated with connectors inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment. Penetrations for medium voltage have header plates welded to the outside of an 18 inch containment sleeve.
Each pene-tration consists of three 1000 MCM conductors terminated with premolded stress cones inside terminal boxes both inside and outside containment.
The capability of the electrical penet]} cions to withstand the total range of time versus fault current withous loss of containment integrity under worst case environmental conditions was demonstrated by test.
These test results are summarized in the response to RAI 430.56.
51 The penetrations are arranged in two levels, with one power train and two channels entering above the intermediate floor of the con-tainment building, and the redundant train and two channels entering below the intermediate floor. Once inside the containment, this floor provides the necessary physical separation and protection between the redundant trains; outside the containment, this separa-tion is continued by separate tunnels connecting the penetration area to the switchgear and cable spreading areas of the control building.
Penetration conductors are sized using ICEA guidelines with an additional restriction of a 650C ambient teoperature.
31 The design, construction, and installation of the penetration assemblies are in accordance with IEEE 317 and Regulatory Guide 1.63.
(See Subsections 8.1.5.3, 8.3.1.1, and 8.3.1.2 for further details on compliance to Regulatory Guide 1.63).
k.
Cable and' Raceway Identification 41 #I The computerized conduit and cable schedule provides a permanent record of the routing and termination of cables. Circuit level coding identifies the individual channel or train assigned to each raceway and cable. These data are entered into the conduit and cable program, which in turn produces reports designating the unique number with origin, destination, channel or train, and specific path for every cable. Evet cable is identified by a tag affixed at each end, bearing the un? que cable number.
8.3-52
t SB 1 & 2 Amendment 56 FSAR November 1985 Each channel or train is assigned particular color, as described in Subsection 8.3.1.3.
All safety-related cables have jackets of the color assigned to the particular channel and train so there is no dif ficulty in dis-tinguishing between cables of redundant channels.
Non-safety related cables are associated with either Train A or B and have black jackets with a red trace for cables associated with Train A and a white trace for cables associated with Train B.
It is immediately evident to the operator or maintenance man, by observing the color of the cable jacket, that a given cable is safety-related 32 and that it is a particular channel or train. This system also prevents placing a cable of one channel or train with cables of another, by the obvious dissimilarity of Jacket color.
Each cable is further identified by a footage and cable code on the jacket of the cable at intervals of approximately five feet.
Reference to pulling records reveals the cable number, routing, separation, circuit type, and use of any cable at any accessible point in the raceway system where the footage marker and cable code can be identified.
Exceptions to the above cable identificatior. riteria exist fer vendor supplied speciality cables for radiation monitoring system and portions of various other systems (for example telephone system, lighting and fire protection / detection).
For these exceptions, the necessary information to ensure adequate control of separation, installation, inspection, etc. is provided in the construction documents.
M Raceways which are part of the computerized cable and conduit schedule are marked to identify their number and circuit level.
Conduit raceways are identified at each end where conduit te rmina te s and at both sides of walls, floors and in-line boxes. Tray raceway markers are spaced at 15 foot or less intervals.
These markings are in the same colors assigned to the channels and trains. For example, a raceway with a red section marking is utilized only by cables with red (or black with red tracer) jackets.
Hence, it is readily apparent that a given cable is routed with its respective channel.
Raceways which are not part of the computerized conduit and cable I
schedule may not be marked with a unique identification number, I
but their function is obvious by tracing the raceway to its end j
device.
These raceways may be used to carry vendor supplied speciality cables for radiation monitoring system and portions of various other systems such as telephone system, lighting and fire protection / detection.
For these raceways, the necessary infor-mation to ensure adequate controls of separation, installation, inspection, etc. is provided in the construction documents, w
Since, in general, there is no sharing of safety-related systems between the two units (see discussion of compliance to CDC 5.
Subsection 8.3.1.2), there is no need to distinguish the safety-related cables of one unit from the safety-related cables of the 8.3-53
SB 1 & 2 Amendment 55 FSAR July 1985 other unit. As such, the cable and raceway coloring scheme is identical for the two units.
In the comon areas, the unit to which a cable belongs is not apparent from the raceway or cable markings.
If it is required to know the unit to which a cable belongs, it can be obtained by observing the equipment designation number, which has the unit number as a prefix. The basis for cable and raceway identification is to distinguish between redundant channels, indicate which channel is involved, and which cables are safety-related.
1.
Administrative Responsibility and Control Administrative responsibility for assuring compliance with appli-cable design criteria and bases relative to independence of redundant systems rests with the A/E's Project Electrical Engineer. He is responsible for coordination with the A/E's field electrical super-visor to verify that the independence, separation and availability of Class IE equipment is preserved during installation of the electric power system.
The following control procedures are established by the A/E's Project Electrical Engineer to assure compliance of the electric power system with the design criteria and bases.
1.
Periodic design reviews with the cognizant engineer, the design supervisor, and the reviewing engineer to assure the criteria I
are being interpreted and followed, 2.
Issuance of periodic administrative and design directives covering procedures, and 3.
Periodic field reviews at the job site by the Project Electrical Engineer and/or the cognizant engineer to check field installation procedures, to provide interpretation of design drawings and guidance for solution of field installation problems, and to verify compliance with criteria.
The design of the conduit and raceway system is guided by the recommendations of applicable IEEE, ICEA and NEC standards.
For l
instance, the. limiting percentages of fill of internal area of the SL various size conduits or cable trays are fixed in one of the input forms of the computer conduit and cable schedule and these limits are automatically applied to all conduits and cable trays by the computer.
If the conduit or cable tray is one which the computer is free to size, it designates the size which accommodates the cables to be enclosed.
If the conduit or cable tray size is designer-designated and the fill exceeds the limiting percentage, the computer indicates an error message so that either the conduit can be made a larger size, or the cables routed by another path.
By these methods, all raceways are assured of being of adequate capacity.
Correct installation practice assures that the design criteria by which the equipment was selected are noe violated during construc-tion.
Installation bases are prescribed, where necessary, by the 8.3-54
r i
i i
ma s w
ant e/
erset enem.
Mar.e at f tin ama agswEng taustv mee 4 wast esas Eisa tsuu H se.F e
>* M f N 36 f T ='a' a4 o-e n-a es4 a4 m.w
~
~,
.~,
~,
.mi
~
.-3,
~
.~,
~im nrtaret e e
ensaus et go 30 eg M
M 30 M
go M
ge u.
w@
we w@
we we mm_ eso me@
ae@
me@
ee@
== @
o u
u u
u a.om.mak.
wue uo uO uO
.-e u O
&l El Lt 45 El
=
. u
===.It.so
=.a es as.
ee as en m
u 6.
u u
u Lee
=as.
- erm nitrA41u s
o g
g g
g g
Self -@
5 Pas s M aistet sluta n e Latt a fit ua.g S f f' KP5 64 BL*1 3
....... - act l
m.
_m_
I
.... ~ tict m
s
- j..
g.
+.=y e;.....,
k
?('l 8
/
s\\
g.
f i
t C' S 3 4 %4N4 2 h 4 44 'pt 6'
) h e 66 tog d' 3 h 4 $6 354 4' 3 h 4 $4199'@# 3 h 4 56 350 C' 3,945449O' 3 34
.+.
. c.,
ion.
as c..s
. ii..
ISE 640 9%99 i D a
.vgig em O
aae I
3 F1 m,
g j
a6 mes
...... - ma
[
g i
K4 e,1 l
-s
.n c.
/j,N ~,
~
=.y L -
n a
M~.
- g..s.
f i
B m
g' I
I I e' i i i st we e a i e se w c' a 3 i 54 9e e', a i,i a6 See e', a i in sus c' 5 * $4 'vic' #, i
- 66 '** c' 3, i 8
x.a
. us
. e.,
. w t.
e, ca.s
.na Ind fif fl cmi
.' bb.'( a m a=mm eu fitP4 4e ?.S'
- ttt
Amsudment 59 May 1986 cw c
n.u,a.=
.= n
.n
.. w.
w.
a.u
=ssan.
w m wa.=
m.c
,s ew
,,=?E.. lF.,,"r /.
v n4 n+
n e+
e+
n a
as n'
as n-.
es.
n4 ue n-e uss m i
.w i wi i
mi
_i
%i
--_i i
r.i
.% i
.i
%i
.i m m...
c., o, eu,.
80 GG 59 99 9.
9.
SG 90 g.
g.
ge gg go gg ge e.
Ih
$19 99 wo w@
w@
we we we w@
mg
=@
== @
.w w,
e u
u o
a a
a u
o u
u u
u u
u u
u
.4 u e
.4 u e wue
.4 u e
.4 u e wue no wue m.
-w a
a
$ ~~ '
.Jf%'.i.t
.u
=c =-
et....e.n s'n O
..s
.i m..,.
,,, w i m,. w.,.su-
.m w s 6 u.s m c s g..s
..u u,9
.c,
...,n,.,so n
u, n
w K :fa,a.b. ~/=
$$ = = 5 -"o ~ = =
4
. LE*?a "J','"." '11 /,*.,' "t 1".T. ra. :.N.,.'*J..n. N...P.
a, swa i n.m.,o,f.".*n' u.*m T'. m,
.m ms~.
- a..c.
n x m,. s =,m.-.
m E".,,,
.......<w w.o..~ -.om..a a.
.c.%.a w a..
u un - e.n =on
. m i-e i
-~
~
u i=>
wi e n.
-~
y,ggy,.zy.e nm.ma w un
,w.
=.m.ua,
' y.y;n',.m,$ ryt,g. r'"gm;., y,=g,,,,,,,
a'
=*
'* a c
~ei w-*
- um'**
.~
.~c
=.,
.w
~
,.*M n.,...w m. y.
m.", A n e n.,. ~
a.~=~uwe cef coa u m. ~a ~ ~di ~- ~.=
.,,.,r e..
m.nno-w w
uuo u
- m. n. s,.
.. ow w sm w: < c ui =
i.
,n.T-e, o.m =.,m.,.u.
'.*c~*=a="*.u..-.==== ~5. = = c e v ' c= *== = = =
su% a
..u us
- u.w~. *~..
.r a. u c=.,=, am....~ ~.o m.
o m 4,,s. h~. ~= u
~
6.n m..w. mL..M. 'adE:f,, b,.., P
,u..,,o s, u.
n w
u.
m i.n u - ~
m
~
o
.m...
c~
uu.
,.m..
,~,
om-
.~.
m
' f."L':'",.J1WWU, J..,*n. 'l ~.J.0. ~."." r.T...<"~*="=" =-
.....~um.".m-.-.m......
a.~ --- - ~."- ~ 5- ~*nm -
me m
=**a a
- v. ~ r.a.n
- u.....o,m, n eu w ou,,.... ~.
a
.. au
., eu m'=
Tin".4?.P. W!*.'P.'i."If."i i'd ? ! ' '""'gw"' " p*
~i +am i.,...J.Y.l':4.",'"r.Fr.'P::'S*;1A*.
- 8 'r,y;r. '*a *== = 'a==.c M';%lf%':0,'M pg,;,. --,
u,.g.
~ w aL.w,....,.b,.."2,, WJ.,"J.,,
- i.~.~. ~s.n..~~w
-.,=. mn..iae.,
m = a
. ~. ~. ~ w a
.,om. %,w.
v w~~
u
-m....
. a no c,.,...
. ~ u,n m e ~,..
.~,~ m 4
. -~
~ -...
.,.c.
m g
mm,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,om, f.:S. o/.,r l:.5.r..,W.v,.g'au,W..so. 2,. c*..<.~
a ua.o
- g. m n.
4.s ta.
s~
nm
~ w.
u,w
, = ca.,..
i c-
- a '-
ma,,. ~
. u m.. w..mw
. n
.m,.~
~
'."".*.", M.! U,N,~.' T.J' T,,w*J.".L.... u
- ,.-,.t;;, yg.r,pg.<;1. <~ * * - ~
.... w.
...n o c
.~.......o.o
.a
- m., i. ~...,n.o mo,w m
.=
n,m
*f Al'T4,:1/i?.7,"i.l"J/Wr,4 *,':l*.?"*'
mac..~.m.~.,e.,u.w.im+- -on m - m
.fo a=i.,u
.m m...m ci..
s
..um...
.u,...
mm.,,.,
nw,.,,,.,., m -
o.
.-a w..m.e.
o-
.c.,
m,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,au,,,.,,,.,.a_,,m.,,_
g;,,,.,n.wy~~o a... a
.u.. - m.
~
.um,.~._..w..w.mm kax w~.,.n
...u m ue., ~. ~....%.n e w o," - - - o
. ~-'~~.' ~ " =
~
x o
. i
- u. mo.
m.
.. ~
..m.
n.s..,',.. a.,. ua...
., n., m e
.,t.. tiu.um e...
.um,,. m.ca
,.,,, w m_, m,,,,.,.
r.4......
4, eth m.1o" 5
wc.......
~,
.n f u b.~m. n,m
. ~.. _.
c u no,
- m. o, me m..,..~
mm,
...,.m.,~,-.,,-.m.ou
-....m e
- n...
....,m
.,e. A.,
mo
- ~...
.m
.n w
. - ~.a..,..~
n-.. ~.. "- - - ~
. ~ ~
=
,o.,
.. _ m n
.....,~.m...m..
~
~,m.m.,...
.m.
.. ~ -
~ ~ ~ -
u...
....... ~..,.,,n
~....
. P ~.,,.,,m m..,.,.,.
. mm,
.--n
.o r
....s o
.,...,m.,,,..m..
u.~
-..w
.. ~ ~
,., m. ~ mo.
. mm. m,
a c
.u ~,...~
m
..n......~,o.,-..
A n} hI
=
w 3
n-..w
@,m.taaet.c a.. u n... u.~. w,.u...o..s.,.,.,.,,m.,-.
w n
i
.. Jm,.. m,,
- n...
CAR)
~.u n.
.m.u...~,.
..o
..m.o...
., ~...
..,.m
~.,n.~..,
..t.~...,..
.m..,.~.,.c
.~,
- o..,
m.
.Mt.mt
.,.<m.W
~. <...
S E
,M...
Ca b,c m,~o m.,a, s w..m.. m. a,,...m m oa...
, g e On
..m~
~..i berture Card NOGO 60'M. O \\
T PUBLIC 5ERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 9763.F.300219 l
FIGURE 311(B)-1. 5H.1
E c.
.~
T T
T y
y m=
.as.t.u.
ggt ".40 33 ett?,89,t castf gagt.e.r,g gueng EElyy) s
.c.4
.e...
,3.' =
-- i ut,,
r ut.,
,c.->
a.,
w.
i --r,
1.evm.n. -.
ws us ses n,s as ses n,s os as us os es
.e
.e
.e
-,w w,4 m-m u
u u
s-m aw.
=
mi s.s.n e.
e.
=
a.
e
...e.
x.,,
xm.,,
y m., =
is o' u a e' is o' u a e' is /
sJ e e' is s' eess,@
= 0l,:ta,'jrp 'u
,c.,,,'.m,,
mam
..,=.
ac,
i c
,y maa n a.. ic, ww+
nn.
,a rf L
.' an ott e u*e->
m...
~,
. mm.,
.~
~,
31gta,tg ar m.anas es os as os so es es os se e4 e
s a.
m u
u u
_m_tsume.ew wcer.,.
==s ks e esc e
k-ses a
se m
.yc.,.
EE8 s4 kC 1 tE6
=
a.
kq>f 80%
==
sEsst 806
.a.
kM POS s s. pas um.a.es s-e 1
=.
G
- a
==
9 6
- ase_. y es uttvet e ecgszwt e
.saan. @
i M
ase M
44 eg 30 M
i a.seim eaos.
ecm.,,
Q PQ 4I e IJ B e Iae 3.5 s ise
?8 tea seu G
=
m esta/
See tae aseel MW GEER 4T'ge ecom,n (Lisanes y4 Ft
^'k 89 la 98-M 08 44 99 %
C Xe'on
.JD. 6,
6_ 1 e' CG ov es e.ag _e e ts.w as 1 a; ; c( e, i
.;6..s i
.ts *w A 1
."C [( mT
.ha.
.Do 8us.6 21mt'M a>
a-
De og et te e9 94 e9 09 9
e9 m.as gg te to te
.M )M.a.*M' h4e e
a ses.1 pos e
kane see e Las
-s B
==
h e.e 4
9 wa ers.a6 5 atl
==
s ata
=
e-o 3 e-o 5 a-M3
=
4_meJ es
=
=
e i
3 i
..eca a =
= -ima'u
,, t
,, /
=
,, /
.m. s um cam sn.
.M.,
pJ.# a.gra am EktClunta f**ftsEf a4 800ml su.t.ar'..
er, Q
<m.i= "
o,. @
n.e @
n->@
o-
.~.
..c-...
~.
., yE'11' nnm-.
c n
at\\ g g
.e f(,
esim..
s-m s-=
um
.,m GL 4 1 pel
=
N bes.t 905 u,,,f et.t s-e.
km
.=
=
hsat tes W AWlb'0B "e
\\pe riure Card
+ =.a 'w. 'u
,, /
,, /
./
.. e'
.m s e wmi..
w.
n.
f ee aiP'ased nat{ t a p It emp G5 46
'f1 ist taeg ph
" a8
Amendment 59 May 1986 F
s' m. retswas est c us s.$=Ly g,ses,o u s.st m,c u ka
.cau t.it *ai c w m,g stuma a.a.
r.
e.
s+
nt +Q,
no-s as4 me ma pu.
i
- m.x...,
~..,
.m
.m.,
m,
.z..,
.m 7
a.
e.
m a.
m m
a e
n n
m
.m e.,
m e.
e n.
t.
w he m.4 a-
_u ase m.,
=
se. 9
.s m,.m u
- u..s..
m u_
t is
$4 =1 4 6 soe ws hE.I P 9t f P.n s
e,t 89h
.-. s
.4 i n
- e. s s
se e.
s.
s.
e, s.
eo io e.
s g
g a
s g.fJt
.ctet.' i ggi o
.etsa et i syt.y i
s eao ts e e t.
e
- v. e
.J s e
- i. e.
4.e
.s o
.4 i e
- i. e in e I
ae.
a.
.au.us r:..% o Fa.d4 tan.s, tJo.6
,,,,'I
.E E _w.
13.JP.R.,
.t 4
-. a +
v+
R@j
- w. s "$@
- 5. g%
r t
w..
rs i net 7
==
- r.=i
.a u...
-.*1
.w.=,
e u..
.w.
. : a.,
i e n.
.w.*
i.. m. r as es e
ese e.
e.
s.
st_a.1+
6
=.iars.
.sfe.ra
_4
_6
_t et meet we m.
m....
m...
q
+
q
- t..g
,,.g.,
- s..
T g
g
,c;.
- m..
..w.c
.m.,
.w.m
. - ~....z e..
.m.
.-.c e.
.1
.e
.. e' is e' e. e' sa [
's e'
.s a[
....... - w
.. ~,
W"?
Ff PF Ff
,..O@
.., ts)
,. m
- s..e m
,. m...
.. _ m e...
.._..m..,
.~
.....~.
m_,
e_
m, _
.i n.i v e. u. a.
..,a. m....
MoL 6 coo16 - O A PUBLIC 5ERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION. UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 9763.F-300219 l
FIGURE 311(B)-1. SH. 2
'"-- -+
W I
se sne.Lf,F, EE4 gaW eu.f.a#
so.t i'f4uf e
sm et, it u
- t. agge=
a c
- i
-i
.-.i mi
-i sew --
q rsnata=
u u
se.
m,.
s -..
u.
s -..
s e.n =,
y
..e i,. J
.. /
.J e..'
'"'5$"
./
ut
.- G>
e e
e us.s ia.,
u,,.
- x. "L
..cm""5,
- m. w.
n,
.e t
gg.'=
.s no q
- m..
~
-- _i ca.,
. -i mm., 3
~
1m.'usn.>
es es
.a as 88 i.
wr-su m sta.=.'.)
v.pe =' 8 f5.L**_*wd sue m m
s su m s.
=
sw m san.s m se.
tw.s
.w.c sis.n.u
.n
.n.
..,..a u.J o.J u.J sa.'
u..'
== e e
e e
u
.. Y. cuas
....,.,. a.uti sa.,
e er i
i.~.n.,=
n
%i
=%A 2 s.ae *.h 1
6 ;(f.'
er%.s t 9ms_% A 1 C : G.,
h%A I m%A 1
- C C( h'
.lBhk i e
M.1*!M -'
1
.m e.
as es
.e
.a
.e me m.
se e
u u
te
.c55 E we
.p(E.=',,)
25MMu'r
._.a s-.
me.s.t.n s.
.. m sw,.
_s -n e s.
ssas
-a '._
=
i 4'- *'ia'"
,./
,,t u.J a... J i..'
mes -e f4 6
sas e.e es. wet.se sa.ma m4 sa.teg n +4s -e at t 4 e gese.ond.1 pg. 3 pg gg p.41
,5 ama c w c=
.wsi
.w
% ypn.' 3
.e.( t i.
w.% i
- ccco,
.wsr
. e=* 6 i ca.' i A -
.o.m i
u,.m. --
i a
1
==a.
t.
e.
se 1
9 y\\UFh f=DA.8's. ***
n e..
e.
+=.
.e.
g g,g
.re==
.m s.'
s
.sw s
.s.ea s
...' s n
ss a
,n
..y, i-A1.o Avallable 08
.m. e "
i i i' "~
/
./
- l e'
\\perture Card
__j
.e.M..it e s.am m'El.I m,
te
. su i hasa I.W l
. M. SQI
.lm
(& E. in.d
..A f.
4
- A 4
O
et Amendeant 59 May 1986 w...
r M.n.&e 4 0 l% a es
.lf a..
GER. ec. pa.E.a..
y grunt arg ao en f% fel.
Sm fg.E.
- 94.. Af g t
i a
F. 4
- p..
P.,
- p. g
- s. g f
y Mw I
hI mi KNe' i mI mi
.C;m.T 1 mT h E.M.T 1
,.p. - I aN,$jE *' I up.h I am i 65.f.I h _l abdAmt i eC C E.'
t t,
u e
w
.i
=
=
=
.s a
e 4
i e
e.a mes swe se e-a Es
.u.
t u.
E 1
._.s 6
k tps u_
.u...
u..
twe e.s
- h.,. a.
f..
- u. a
- e. s w x_%
=<...i 6.
W M
.J 9
3 1 =
3 3
58.O I..t W I.t II.t e a..
s t.I
=
40.1 L. I.I ft.
4 s.#
4 f-i Pea.a aget e k. w
'"k g [ *"
L4tg.t. gr. a.o.
M.6
, tc.
e ( cee 8t".6
.C Pd.pt Em.e
- a..
N
'E. R.#
gg c
P.-see 8 4.
89 of
- f..
- 9. A
?
.[: M *'
I RL 1 M :M.'
h+
ma 1
.;CG.' i
.hi
. dana.4 i C C..' 1,
9 e*
I CH.! i wf%*
. W.S..' ? Cf.' )
1. M..t i
- 6. ;(i.'
- .64 i '.9%%
1 e.
as e
nn.
so.
m nos o.
a, a.
a.
3.
g.
3.
t.
g.
3.
g f_
w..
- 3 O s.
6 g.
ge go...gg
- Li*ge'd D
ga u
m.
wm we u.
u.
w sw.
w i
ma es.e. :
u= a
=
u w
u
=
=
i i
i i
t u.
ei 4
i..
- t...
u..
4 g
I T
T Y
.w m
e
.u.. ~.
ecc.c. m, u
s.
u.,
st.,.u,..
l
~
l'a c m.
-n-
... u
..r
-ar
,i 6-n
.i e u.-
i ni
. m.-
~ ~.. vu.7 1...
. ~,. i n.. -
. x; w.
.m
.m.
.... i.m I
[
m
_ l._en m
=
m
=
- n
,n u
n
,=m.
s.
u sr-s.
wm u
u., m u
wm wa wa b
wm 5
)
'f.1"?' 8
=
u w
u i
i i
L_
...i t..i u.
u.t s.
- n.. k t
e t
u..
u.
0 s
r Y
T c.
w.
m.,..,w m,..-
..m-m.
e,4 n-o
.4 ci, &
C
.c av
.%i
. w.=,
.m.,
.wi a : r..
.~.
. - - i na.-
.~.
.~.i
.;u.
.c..,
.,..,.w..
o.
1 a.n.,,
a m..,
.n am., s
.: a..,.
aa.v n.rs
(.ca i.
.m w=
wm s_m u ww u.rm 1
u u
u,=
g1 de t 3
de 3 tamt.&
E l
e4 9 ee u...
w.,,
-<m.,.
m...
m.,.
l t
?
g m.:..
i
,a.
uiJ i
\\_
0 1
m_..
I 1
i Hoecoms.oS i
PUBLIC 5ERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVlq0NVENT CHART l
SEABROOK STATION. UNITS 1 & 2
)
{
FINALSAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT l
9763.F.300219 FIGURE 3.11(B) 1. 5H. 3 t
f
V y
r i
e h ees s
Cas o. aft css v.att Cet *.sts Q.at si,s Ce.t o.a vate e.yy g.gp +
g.ey.qD' 8FM stat g,* $
89 4 @
Ev-,a $
tv-se 4 coo'o.
.% a
.wn=i saetor a w%._ r
.e_ i acwor a.w=r
.>.A i c:u.T 4 we== r
. ><awa i f.ur,pa'Q Ms a.am e4 er e,
e.
t e,
es n
se es e,
_ee
=
w se w
se Pet t M m essa us e
to e
e.a=
ser ros
.o arm.=
mses aos tLen, pas km pos mer
== am e
e m s, se s kos ws v.
msnt is.
eteno'.s CD~, 0 s
.e es se es se os
.e
=
e,.m. von e. css aumes a actuut a eacts',
**"e"'t'
(, a d to s d e.t a s' i s a e' tr a e' ta s d at s o' on.
T maams sama=, wases cotea manos sr esui,s m.,
f Paa h.valCe g.y.g g
E*'*w a's s e-+.
sv-e st4 tt-ra IM 25'o.
w = 2 9 6 =^ = i v : r o,
=% :
4e was i cam' e aos..< -.>.a==
1 v a ='
= * = =. **.**g
.'.1.?2.C.au. "'
j
_m ce es e
es er es me es
.4 e4 es u.
se si a
se Pet S%M e%sa ac ta s, e wa n===
e 60s e
6es e
e e
, n.
e e
.e e
e m
e e
e e
a_._o rm elc a=,_.
es u
se u
,,.a., @
u w
3
.a,_._
... d
... e
..e ear -e 8
_.e.-
., ~,.
.=...
.e,.
,e_. ~,,.
., e
.m....
.x e,.
~. -,
I
,e
,e
- I
- ( 5%*f eu.
m.
ace L lLra, PDS
=.-
$UCwt Pol kor, 705 Essa, et.
=
e aas kcat pas scart pos k sset pas k ce, eg.
.o
.e
.e
.o m
m m
m
,, e
,, s
.. e
.- -I TI APERTURd
-~
~ " "*'
e.,-_.
CARD
~
.. ~...
co...
.,e e co... e
<e -. e iH
.- ~,
2m.,,
..~i
.x e.,
.-~i
.x e.,
~
i m. a -.
Alea Ava11able On 4perttire Card
- m. a.a m,.
i.,,..
m,,
m,
. m,..
m,..
k m, ac.ese6 k sse.t u.E
=
s c.
- w...
==
k sa,f W.
==
m..
- w. e.
k Cm W
-m se_esot t cs,#
w w
w a
w
_e
._>_e t <m @_
5 1
' O ' et W -M. M I
,,e 4gg G
,,g
=*-e 1
.c.,
t,es ec',, ase cr,.es serg s gt 805 08.T.4 54[ aW g M emmed
Am:nd n nt 59 May 1986 iw..,..cs i
== is me.-
.,s w.u s.
,.u,vs
,..,s
- m.. a,s n-e e-<
.,w <
.-,w e e
L t.-u @
am @
- i. @
i.-. @
- i. s. @
a -w cae.
1
..i cas.
w,
.. i s t a c.
.1
.w
. i scue.
r.w.,
x:ac.
cae.
.m,
, c.a e.
m w
e, c
w e
n e
a ir a
n a
n w
w w
w w
w
_ l
,u w,c m.,..
k C.,
. 4 h E.s,.
w,..
m.,..
h.w,..o k s, e. 6 e
.6 KE, Y, us,..
af 6 u
.o u
u
.o a
ce u
u c2 i
i ueene.
ts =
av t,.
(,.
is i,
i.
ir i
(.
e 6'
3 arc,cs ci na c..<. n. i.e
'* d
,1"a'd u, **=a* '** 'c
,.,l"J
.f
.'.'f;'j e<
m -e t,-7.
(,-..
t,-
[, i.
t t - 5.
(I 1.
cae
.>.i eae
. ~.
~... i e u. '
. ene
.i
.a a e
..i c:ae.
a#..
.me.
l
.M e.
e e
e
.5
.i o.
es e.
.i n
.s e
e w
w w
w m,m
.e w,m wsm w,m wim wm
- w..u.
-..m x w.
c w,
w.
s c...c
-,.3 w
.c
-.. is x we.
w u
n u
u
.i u
w n
4 so ume eme
.. 9
..1
.. 1
.. 9
.. 5 a...
.. 3 u.e F
ew.1 um coma.s u.,
,<.m,, w..,
c.
s.. c...
..u...
x u..x.,
2.
n wv r+
1.
u.
c s. s
. s. @
co-.. s
- c. u 3
.::a 4 v..
.u
. :a e
.mi eue
.~,
... r.me
.:.... c:ue
-..w.-
.me n
n n
n n
n n
o u
m,m w.m w.m m,. 6
- w...
wi.. w,.n.
m,..
w.m wm m.,
w.
wm w u w...
=
u u
o w
w a
u u
l
,,,,..m. w. _
= e, =_,
w e,:v
.....,,m 3r -
te -e te t
,y
..4 3 sm.
.m.
.~..,
.~.
.m..
3, c4 c4 e
o rio c.
c4 2,o c4 c4 C4 C.
.:me i rues wi,..
- w...
ws.r.
- w..c
.m...
c....
m r
g 3
5 93,065000-76-04 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEABROOK STATION - UNITS 1 & 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 9763.F-300219 l
FIGURE 3.11(B).1, SH. 4" i
r-
- o t
.4 s
't i
a i
,e PENE%R AR NT AKE CWNG M BULONC AREA AREA /
RA0iOAcivE TUNNEL CONTROL MM WNT WECHMAL EQUIPMENT PUWP R00W ELEVATICW
(-4 34'-6' MAKI# 'R T EalNT 2 r'
46'-0*
4 ENYR FTAL WPA.6 @
yyg.g g gy.$ g gy.g g Co@N NORuat 2 NORuAt i NORuAt i NORW6L I TEuPERATLRE fT) wAxiutad IT2 c4 c4 c4 WN MJW 50 40 0@
0@
PRESSURE (P5ci WAKIMUW SUCNT POS 0
0 0
NORuAL SLIGNT P05 0
0 0
WNWUW 0
0 0
0 HUwoTY_ 00
)
WANUW @
I 60 60 60 WNWUM 3
5 30 30 RADIATION (PADS)
NORMAL NTECRAfr0 2 X c
IXC*
IX0*
fX0*
3 3
3 JOSE
- PER NUCLEAR DISCPLNE CALC.NOJ 4.4J4.94 F OtEt 01.
- PER NUCLEAR DISCIPLNE CALC.N0J 4.4J4.70 F (REW 33.
l l
l l
l I
-w
Amendment 59 l
May 1986 ER IUNIT ?>
ELECTRICAL Tupe(L WAN STEAW & FEE 0 MATER PIPE CHASES EAS A
AST ELECTRICAL T
AR R00uS ELECTRICA RAY AREA L5 SE Egiy CHA55.
3'-0*
8'- 2' 3 '-O*
3'-0' CT TA @
CT T8 @
ET-5A @
PCE T @
PCE-8 @
PCE-9 @
PCE-C @
NORMAL t NORWAL 1 NORMAL 1 NORWAL 1 NOAWAL 1 NORWAL I HORWAL I ~
04 04 06 13 0 00 H4 00 0@
0@
M 0@
0@
0@
0@
0 0
SLIGHT POS SLCHT POS 0
SUGHT P05 0
0 0
$UGHT P05 SLCHT Pos 0
SLIGHT POS 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 60 60 43 30 30 to 30 30 30 3
30 30 30 30 ex c38 l x c!
- l x c3
- lx 0
- lx0*
lx 0
- lx0*
3 3
3 3
NOTE:
FOR NOTES AND CENERAL E0TES SEE
]
TMS ORAW1NG SEET I OFQS APEILTIIRE CARD U*o Avasme o,
,..P,,,c c,,a PU8UC 5ERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMP5 HIRE SERVICE ENVIRONMENT CHART SEA 8 ROOK STAT 10N UNIT 518 2 FINAL 5AFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 97634-300219 l FIGURE 3.11(B)-1, SH. 5 39 BIAOC076 oer w
\\
--fe r--
l Y
ATTACHMENT H EXCERPT FROM ASLB HEARING TRANSCRIPT TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1986 CONTENTS Transcript pgs. 384-389 l
l l
l l
l l
r-,s.
354 l
l Sim 7-6 MS. CURARN:
I would like to turn now to equipment qualification file No. 113-20-01, which I would ask the reporter to mark for identification purposes as Exhibit 5.
4 5
markedNECNP Exhibit 5 for 6
identification.)
7 INDEX MS CURRAN:
Do you have a copy of that, 8
Mr. Woodward?
9 WITNESS WOODWARD:
Yes, I do.
10 BY MS. CURRAN:
11 Q
According to Applicant's testimony at page 7, this is one of the pieces of equipment that is not qualified for 100 days.
Am 2 correct?
A (Witness Salvo)
That is correc-15 Q
This oiece of equipment is qualified for -- at 16 least not for ali parameters -- this piece of equipment g
17 i
is qualified for 30 submergence, am I correct?
18 y
8 A
(Witness Woodward)
Yes, that is correct.
j 19 i
O Would you please describe the location and the j
20 use of this cable at the Seabrook plant?
l 21 A
This cable is 300 volt instrument cable that 22 can be found anywhere in the plant.
With respect to all 23 specific applications, I couldn't answer that question.
24 O
But it is possible, is it not, that this cable 25
?
P..
385 i
- g l
'I l
Sim.7-7 1
' supplies electricity to instruments that would say show 2
the conditions of accidents at the plant and. monitor the 3
various parameters associated with accidents at the plant?
4 A
It is'possible, yes.
End'Sim 5
l Sue fols 6
7 8
-9 10 11 12 13 1
1 14 15 16 i
17 18 g
~
i l
M 21
. =
22 23 1
24 25 l
l
^l 386 I
1.- S u eW o
Now, according to Page 7 of the qualification 2
report review checklist, this test program doesn't include 3
submergence tests.
And, their checklist refers to Note 9 i
for an explanation of that.
i d
1 5
I would like to turn to Note 3 which is on Page 11 6 -
of the assessment checklist.
And, in particular I would like il i
7 to discuss the statement in Note 9 that this particular
{
8 jl table supplies instrument rack MM-IR-12.
9 Now, as I understand it, the cable that supplies 10 l MM-IR-12 may be submerged during an accident; is that II correct?
I2 ]
A (Witness Woodward)
That's correct.
\\
13 i O
However, the note explains that instrument rack Id MM-IR-12 is denoted operability Code C.
Now, would you II explain what operability Code C means?
16 f A
In accordance with the regulations and criteria IIh set forth in NUREG 0588 and Regulatory Guide 1.8.',
all the l'
I8 equipment in Seabrook for which qualification is addressed 19 is assigned ope:-ability codes.
l 20 '
operability Code C represents equipment which may 21 see what we call harsh environment of which submergence may be 22 l' one subsequent to design basis events.
23l However, it performs no safety function relative to mitigating the accident or putting the plant in a safe
...o.,. i p.m n.,.. i.
condition after these events.
And, also it has been evaluated l 5
l
'd 387 l
83-2-SueW I to see if any failures of this equipment due to the environ-l 2
ment will effect anything else in the plant, the safety of 3
the plant.
4 0
Okay.
I would like to turn to Reference 12 which 5.
is the letter from the Impell Corporation to Yankee Atomic, I
6.
dated February 2nd, 1986.
Now, on February 2nd, do I under-7 stand it that at that time the Impell Corporation considered I
a that instrument rack MM-In-12 was Class lE equipment which 9
would have been operability Code A?
10 (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.)
11 A
Yes.
As of the date of this letter, the equipment i
12 ;
on, and parts of instrument rack of MM-IR-12, were considered l l
r 13 g to be essential to the plant at that time.
i la O
And, am I correct that Impell suggested that i
15 rack MM-IR-12 should either be relocated above flood level 1
16 0 or it should be shown that operability for a moderate energy 9
17 d line break is not required?
18 j Is that correct?
19 -
(The witness is looking at the document.)
A Yes, as stated on Page 4 of that letter.
20; 21 Q
Now, did New Hampshire Yankee relocate this 22 instrument rack?
i 23 !
A (Witness Salvo)
During the initial phase of the 24 EQ program, an assumption was made that -- a conservative l
Meet Resmners, lnc.
25 assumption was made -- many pieces of equipment were assumed m
g......
i.
388 O
l to have an operability Code A, which meant that they were
=8-3-SueW i
required to perform a safety function.
When the specific 2
files were reviewed and we encountered problems that did not I
3 I
l envelope all accident assumptions, conservative action assump-4 i
5 tions, that we made we went back and did a specific review of l
i l
6l each piece of equipment's operability requirements.
7l This is what was done for this particular instrument l
l rack.
It was originally assumed an operability Code A as a 8l 9l conservative assumption.
And, afher problems were encountered I
due to submergence, we then performed a specific review for 10 j 11 l that piece of equipment.
And, it was determined that no P ece of equipment in that rack was required to perform any l
i 12 l
safety function during a mild energy break.
13 And, that was performed by United engineers.
14 15 Q
And, was a report and an evaluation prepared for 16 that piece of equipment?
.i 17 i A
I believe so.
I.
18 l Q
But, you are not sure?
19.
A Well, United has done a document of review.
I 20 haven't seen a report.
But, United did perform a review and 21 I have not specifically seen the report.
22 !
Q Now, turning back to the Note 9 in the assessment 23 l checklist, Nete 9 refers to Reference 16 as an explanation 24 p for the downgrading of the instrument rack, ftM-IR-12, from ecree neconers. sne.
25,
operability Code A to operability Code C; is that correct?
l l
I i
l
E 6
4 389 i
- R-4-SueW 1l (Mr. Wredward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.)
2 A
(Witness Woodward)
Reference 16 reports that the 3
operability code will be changed in the program from either A 4
or B to C.
i 5
Q And, Reference 16 -- correct me if I'm wrong, but 6
Reference 16 is the only reference in this file to the change 7
in the operability code for that instrument rack, from A to 8
C.
It's the only explanation that's given of how this 9
operability code has changed.
10 Is that right?
11 (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.)
12 A
Yes, this is the official United engineer's l
v 13.
documentatior, that notifies pe'ople that the change will F
14 occur.
Ultimately, the equipment list or that harsh environ-15 ',
ment list we have previously talked about will show that Il 16 y change.
,\\
l 17 y 0
okay.
I would just like te review this reference I
18 with you since it is a kind of un:sual looking document.
I l
19 The first page is an engineering change authoriza-20 tion; is that Light?
21 l A
That's correct.
22 Q
Basically, this lists the equipment, the specific w
l 23 pieces of equipment, for which the company is requesting i
2 4
the authorization to downgrade the safety code?
mere neoorieri, sac.
25 (Mr. Woodward and Mr. Salvo are conferring.)
]
~
l e
1 3
ATTACHMENT I EXCERPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REPORT (EQR)
CONTENTS 1.
SBN-886, Letter transmitting EQR 2.
EQR, Section 2.1 l
l l
l
4 SEA 3R00K STATION Engineerin6 Office
,i October (1,
1985 Fubec SeMee of New %Tpswi, SBN-886 No w Hampshire Yank e e Divlslon T.F. B7.1.2 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention:
Mr. George W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
References:
(a) Construction Permits CPPR-135 and CPPR-136, Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444 (b)
PSNH Letter (SBN-549), dated August 12, 1983, "Response to Safety Evaluation Report Outstanding Issue #5 (SER 3.11, Equipment qualification Branch)," J. DeVincentis to G. W. Knighton
Subject:
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment; SER Outstanding Issue #6
Dear Sir:
As discussed at the Jt.ne 13, 1985 meeting regarding Seabrook's Environmental Qualification Program, the report entitled, "Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Importatt to Safety" (hereinafter referred to as EQR), was being updated and would be submitted to the NRC in the late fall. Accordingly, please find enclosed three (3) copies of the revised EQR, which documents our compliance with 10CFR50.49.
It is also our understanding, from the above referenced =eeting, that the NRC site audit would be scheduled approximately six to eight (6-8) weeks after submittal of the EQR. We respectively request that you advise us as soon as possible of your plans for conducting this audit, so that we can begin planning for support of your audit activities.
If you have any questions or require further clarifications, please do not hesitate to contact us.
V y truly yours, u
' John DeVincentis, Director Engineering and Licensing Enclosure ec: Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Service List P O Bos 300 So@oc*. NH C3374. Te ech:re (603) 474 9521 r
g.
William S. Jordan, III Donald E. Chick Diane Curran Town Hanager Harmon, Weiss & Jordan Town of Exeter 20001 S. Street, N.W.
10 Front Street Suite 430 Exeter, NH 03833 Washing ton, D.C.
20009 Brentwood Board of Selectmen Ro be r t G. Perlis RED Dalton Road Of fice of the Executive Legal Direc tor Brentwood, NH 03833 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wa s hi ng t on, DC 20555 Richard E. Sullivan, Mayor City Hall Robert A. Backus, Esquire Newburyport, MA 01950 116 Lowell Street P.O. Box 516 Calvin A. Canney Manc he ste r, NH 0310!
City Manager City Hall Philip Ahrens, Esquire 126 Daniel Street Assistant Attorney General Portsmouth, NH 03801 Augusta, ME 04333 Dana Bisbee, Esquire Mr. John B. Tanzer Assistant Attorney General Designated Representative of Office of the Attorney General the Town of Hampton 206 State House Annex 5 Morningtide Drive Concord, NH 03301 Hampton, NH 03842 Anne Verge, Chairperson Roberta C. Pevear Boa rd of Selec tmen Designated Representative of Town Hall the Town of Hampton Falls South Hampton, NH 03827 Drinkwater Road Hampton Falls, NH 03844 Patrick J. McKeon Selectmen's Office Mrs. Sandra Gavutis 10 Central Road Designated Representative of Rye, NH 03870 the Town of Kansington RFD 1 Carole F. Kagan, Esquire East Kings ton, NH 03827 Atomic Safety and Licensing Boird Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Jo Ann Shotwell, Esquire Washi ng ton, DC 20555 Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protec tion Bureau Mr. Angi Machiros Departmant of the Attorney General Chairman of the Board of Selectmen One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Town o'.
Newbury Boston, MA 02108 Newbury, MA 01950 Senator Cordon J. Humphrey Town Manager's Office U.S. Senate Iovn Hall - Friend Street Washington, DC 20510 Amesbury, MA 01913 (ATTN:. Tom Burac k)
Senator Cordon J. Humphrey Diana P. Randall 1 Pillsbury St reet 70 Collins Street Concord, NH 03301 Seabrook, NH 03874 (ATIN: Herb Boynton)
e PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SEABROOK STATION ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL E0VIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY 2.0 DEFINITION OF ELECTRICAL E0VIPMENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY 2.1 Criteria for Selection of Equipment The Seabrook environmental qualification program addresses all electrical equipment important to safety which is located in a potentially harsh environment.
Equipment which would not be exposed to a harsh environment during postulated accident conditions (i.e., mild environment) is not included.
A mild environment, as defined in 10 CFR 50.49(c) is, "...an environment that would at no time be significantly more severe than the environment that would occur during nonnal plant operation, including anticipated operational occurrences."
Seabrook Station defines a harsh environment as those areas of the plant where nonnal or accident environmental temperatures exceed 130*F, pressures exceed 1 psig, humidity is 100% and condensing, or the total integrated radiation dose exceeds 1 x 104 rads.
Electrical equipment important to safety which were con'
- idered for inclusion within the scope of the Seabrook program includes the following
A.
Safety-related (Class lE) electrical equipment.
8.
Nonsafety-Rela +ed electric equipment whose failure under postulated environmental conditions could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of safety functions.
C.
Post-accident monitoring equipment.
The systems found to contain electric equipment in the above categories are listed in Table 2-1.
2.2 Identification nf Equipment In response to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.49 paragraph l
(d), a documented review was performed of all applicable design documents to assure that all equipment important to safety [10 CFR 50.49 paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3))
was identified.
The equipment was listed and categorized in accordance with the guidance provided in Appendix E to Regulatory Guide 1.89, Rey, 1.
Revision 2 10/31/85 2-1
/
DCLKETED Uihlic CERTIFICATE OF :3ERVICE I,
Deborah S. Steenland, one of the attorneys hof yyy P3 :35 0
Applicanta herein, hareby certify that on June 17, 1988, I Fcopies;.;r ;,y -
made service of the within documents by depositin('yCffdJj(orlEiWI thereof with Federal Express, prepaid, for deliver i
where indicated, by de ositing in the United States ma'l first class, postage puid, addres. sed to):
Administrative Judge Sheldon J.
Robert Carrigg, Chairman Wolfe, Esq., Chairman, Atomic Board of Selectmen Safety and Licensing Board Panel Town Office U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Atlantic Avenue Commission North Hampton, NH 03862 East West Towers Building 4350 East West Highway Bethesda, MD 20814 Administrative Judge Emmeth A.
Diane Curran, Esquire Luebke Andrea C.
Ferster, Esquire 4515 Willard Avenue Harmon & Weiss Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Suite 430 2001 S Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009 Dr. Jerry Harbour Stephen E. Merrill Atomic Safety and Licensing Attorney General Board Panel George Dana Bisbee U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Assistant Attorney General Commission Office of the Attorney General East West Towers Building 25 Capitol Street 4350 East West Highway Concord, NH 03301-6397 Bethesda, MD 20814 Adjudicatory File Sherwin E.
Turk, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Office of General Counsel Board Panel Docket (2 copies)
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission One White Flint North, 15th Fl.
East West Towers Building 11555 Rockville Pike 4350 East West Highway Rockville, MD 20852 Bethesda, MD 20814
- Atomic Safety and Licensing Robert A.
Backus, Esquire Appeal Board Panel Backus, Meyer & Solomon U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory 116 Lowell Street Commission P.O.
Box 516 Washington, DC 20555 Manchester, NH 03105 l
l
y.
4 i
Philip Ahrens, Esquire Mr. J.
P.
Nadeau Assistant Attorney General Selectmen's Office Department of the Attorney 10 Central Road General Rye, NH 03670 Augusta, ME 04333 Paul McEachern, Esquire Carol S.
Sneider, Esquire Matthew T.
Brock, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Shaines & McEachern Department of the Attorney General 25 Maplewood Avenue One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor P.O.
Box 360 Boston, MA 02108 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Mrs. Sandra Gavutis Mr. Calvin A.
Canney Chairman, Board of Selectmen City Manager RFD 1 - Box 1154 City Hall Route 107 126 Daniel Street Kensington, NH 03827 Portsmouth, NH 03801
- Senator Gordon J.
Humphrey R.
Scott Hill-Whilton, Esquire U.S.
Senate Lagoulis, Clark, Hill-Whilton &
Washington, DC 20510 McQuire (Attn:
Tom Burack) 79 State Street Newburyport, MA 01950
- Senator Gordon J.
Humphrey Mr. Peter J.
Matthews One Eagle Square, Suite 507 Mayor Concord, NH 03301 City Hall (Attn: ' Herb Boynton)
Newburyport, MA 01950 Mr. Thomas F.
Powers, III Mr. William S.
Lord Town Manager Board of Selectman Town of Exeter Town Hall - Friend Street 10 Front Street Amesbury, MA 01913 Exeter, NH 03833 H. Joseph Flynn, Esquire Brentwood Board of Selectmen Office of General Counsel RFD Dalton Road Federal Emergency Management Brentwood, NH 03833 Agency 500 C Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20472 l
Gary W. Holmes, Esquire Richard A. Hampe, Esquire Holmes & Ells Hampe and McNicholas 47 Winnacunnet Road 35 Pleasant Street l
Hampton, NH 03841 Concord, NH 03301 l
l 1 i
l l
il b
I Mr. Ed Thomas Judith H. Mizner, Esquire FEMA, Region I 79 State Street 442 John W. McCormack Post Second Floor Office and Court House Newburyport, MA 01950 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 Charles P.
Graham, Esquire Murphy and Graham 33 Low Street Newburyport, MA 01950 Deborah S.
Steenland
(*= Ordinary U.S. First Class Mail.)
4
-3
.. -.