ML20181A393

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Risk-Informed Licensing Reviews Presentation (1)
ML20181A393
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/30/2020
From: Gregory Bowman
NRC/NRR/DRA
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Schwab A
Shared Package
ML20181A423 List:
References
Download: ML20181A393 (10)


Text

Risk-Informed Licensing Reviews Greg Bowman Deputy Director, Division of Risk Assessment Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Risk-Informed Steering Committee Meeting June 30, 2020

Lessons Learned from Risk-Informed Licensing Submittals

Status

  • 10 amendments for TSTF-505 have been issued

- 3 recently issued

- 7 under active review

- 2 recently issued

- 5 under active review 3

Staff Review Depends on the Application 4b, Risk-Informed Completion Times Greater 50.69 reliance after NFPA-805, Risk-Informed Fire on PRA TSTF-505 Acceptability review Protection Required scope, More should level of detail, flexibility reduce technical for review 50.69 SSC Categorization robustness, and licensee effort plant More representation 5b, Risk-Informed complex Surveillance Frequencies staff review Risk-Informed Inservice Inspection 4

Factors That Impact Risk-Informed Licensing Review Time Review Time (h)

Extensive open F&Os Many Deviations Large PRA Scope (Ext. Hazards)

ILRT One-Time Changes Use of F&O Closure Process 50.69 No Deviations RI-ISI TSTF-425 5 TSTF-505 Limited Scope (IE PRA Only)

Positive Trends

  • Significant improvement in PRA Acceptability for applications

- Use of F&O Closure process reduced F&O review effort

  • 50.69 industry LAR review boards
  • Concurrent reviews
  • Inclusion of previous RAI responses in LARs
  • Excellent audit support, including recent remote audits
  • Continued dialogue
  • Internal staff efforts to improve review efficiency 6

LIC-206, Revision 1:

Integrated Risk-Informed Decision-Making (RIDM) for Licensing Reviews

Motivation and Objectives SRM SECY 19-00361 Culture Change:

Key Elements of LIC-206, Revision 1 Guidance for technical Technical Reviewer Focused reviewers on constructing Guidance risk arguments Simplified flowcharts and Clarified and Simplified checklist Process Implementation Sample safety evaluation language Integrate risk insights to Enhanced Use of Risk Insights reach regulatory decisions Based on Recent Experience Adjust scope and level of effort 9

Next Steps

  • Rollout NRC
  • Implementation
  • Lessons Learned and Improvements
  • Consider providing risk insights, if External they strengthen the case
  • Risk insights not limited to CDF and Stakeholders LERF values 10