ML20155H373

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Response to RAI for Review of Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2,integrated Plant Assessment Rept for Containment Spray Sys
ML20155H373
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/04/1998
From: Cruse C
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9811100106
Download: ML20155H373 (6)


Text

.

CHARLES II. CRUSE Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear Energy 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, Maryland 20657 410 495-4455 November 4,1998 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:

Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Respense to Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 & 2, Integrated Plant Assessment Report for the Containment Snray System

REFERENCES:

(a)

Letter from Mr. C. H. Cruse (BGE) to NRC Document Control Desk, dated January 21,1998, " Request for Review and Approval of System and Commodity Reports for License Renewal" (b)

Letter from Mr. D. L. Solorio (NRC) to Mr. C. H. Cruse (BGE),

September 2,1998," Request for AdditionalInformation for the Review of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos.1 & 2, Integrate Plant Assessment Reports for the Containment Isolation Group, Containment Spray System, and Primary Containment Heating and Ventilation System" (c)

Letter from Mr. D. L. Solorio (NRC) to Mr. C. H. Cruse (BGE),

September 24,1998, " Renumbering of NRC Requests for Additional Information on Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Application Submitted by the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company" Reference (a) forwarded four Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE) system and commodity reports for license renewal. Reference (b) forwarded questions from NRC staff on three sections of the BGE License Renewal Application, including the Containment Spray System. Reference (c) forwarded a numbering system for tracking BGE's response to all of the BGE License Renewal Application requests for additional information and the resolution of the responses. Attachment (1) provides our response to the Containment Spray System questions contained in Reference (b). The questions are renumbered in accordance with Reference (c).

l 9811100106 981104 r

i PDR ADOCK 05000317 k

}

f P

PDR NRC Distribution Code A036D

l._

. ~.

l i

Docum nt Control Desk i

November 4,1998 Page 2 1

Should you have further questions regarding this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Very truly yours, i

I

/g/;- '/

WW STATE OF MARYLAND

TO WIT:

COUNTY 0F CALVERT '

I, Charles H. Cruse, being duly sworn, state that I am Vice President, Nuclear Energy Division, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE), and that I am duly authorized to execute and file this response on behalf of BGE. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this document are true and correct. To the extent that these statements are not based on my personal knowledge, they are based upon information provided by other BGE employees and/or consultants. Such information has been reviewed in accordance with company practice and I believe it to be reliable.

l

/A

/

As/~

/

i Subscri d and sworn before me a Notary Pyblic in and for the State of Maryland and County of

,this k day of //Ouem k.1998.

WITNESS my Hand and Notarial Seal:

Notary Public My Commission Expires:

!. r)OOM fDate' i

CHC/KRE/ dim

Attachment:

(1) Response to Request for Additional Information; Integrated Plant Assessment Report for the Containment Spray System cc:

R. S. Fleishman, Esquire C. I. Grimes, NRC J. E. Silberg, Esquire D. L. Solorio, NRC S. S. Bajwa, NRC Resident Inspector,NRC 1-A. W. Dromerick, NRC R. I. McLean, DNR H. J. Miller, NRC J. H. Walter, PSC l

l

. -.. ~..

2 ATTACHMENT (1)

?

f i

i i

i i

i a-4 l

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION; 3

INTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM i

i

)

i 3

)

i 4

i 1

Baltimore Gas and Electric Company Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant November 4,1998

ATTACHMENT (1)

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

, INTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENT REPORT FORTHE CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM NRC Ouestion No. 5.6.1 Section 6.4.2 of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (CCNPP) Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) states that "It is expected the containment spray will be effective in removing fission products from the containment atmosphere." Discuss why this intended function is not included as part of the system description or the system scoping results in Section 5.6 of the (Baltimore Gas and Electric Company [BGEJ) License Renewal Application (LRA). If this intended function is included, describe the components included within the scope of license renewal and subject to an aging management review. If not, justify why this function is excluded.

BGE Response The function for the Containment Spray System of removing fission products from the containment atmosphere is in fact credited in the CCNPP accident analysis. This function was inadvertently omitted from the system description and scoping results. Omission of this function has no effect on aging management review since as an active function it is not required to be evaluated as stated in 10 CFR 54.21(aXIXi).

NRC Ouestion No. 5.6.2 Discuss why the shutdown cooling intended function, as described in the CCNPP UFSAR is not included as one of the system scoping results in Section 5.6.1.1 of the LRA. If this intended function is included, describe the components included within the scope of license renewal and subject to an aging management review. If not, justify why this function is excluded.

BGE Response ne Shutdown Cooling System is used to remove core decay heat and reactor coolant sensible heat during plant cooldowns and cold shutdowns. The " shutdown cooling intended function" is not included with the functions based on the requirements of 10 CFR 54.4(a)(1) and (2) because CCNPP is a " Hot Standby" plant and is not required to reach cold shutdown following a design basis accident.

As discussed in CCNPP Engineering Standard ES-Oll, " System, Structure, and Component (SSC)

Evaluation," CCNPP is a hot standby plant. The main steam safeties are credited as the heat removal mechanism with steam generator inventory being supplied by the Auxiliary Feedwater System from Condensate Storage Tank 12. RCS temperature will be maintained at saturation temperature of the steam generators for the main steam safeties relief setpoints adjusted for the differential temperature due to heat transfer characteristics across the steam generator tubes. The " shutdown cooling intended function" is, however, included in Section 5.6.1.1 of the LRA, with the group of functions based on the requirements of 10 CFR 54.4(aX3), as "To provide RCS heat removal to ensure safe shutdown in the event of a postulated severe fire..." This function has no effect on aging management review since as an active function its components are not required to be evaluated as stated in 10 CFR 54.21(aX1Xi).

I i

1

~

r,

l l

ATTACHMENT (1) l l

l RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION; I

, INTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR TIIE CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM t

NRC Ouestion No. 5.63 Provide the basis for excluding spray nozzles shown in Figure 5.6-1 in Section 5.6.1.1 from the scope of license renewal.

BGE Response The spray nozzles shown in Figure 5.6.1.1 as not being within the scope of license renewal are l

associated with the emergency dousing function for the containment filter units. See the response to l

Question 5.6.4 below for an explanation of why these components are excluded from the scope of license renewal.

I NRC Ouestion No. 5.6.4 Chapter 6 of the CCNPP UFSAR states that the containment spray mystem supplies the emergency dousing nozzles for the iodine removal units. The ability to put out charcoal fires due to decay heat from buildup of fission products is normally relied upon at some nuclear power plants as an emergency dousing function. Provide the basis for not including the ability of the containment spray system to supply the emergency dousing nozzles for the iodine removal units as an intended function in Section 5.6.

BGE Response The emergency dousing function of the Containment Spray System, as described in CCNPP UFSAR Section 6.7.2, is not within the scope of license renewal. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report l

Section 6.7.2 explains that the dousing system is isolated in Modes 1 through 4. The emergency dousing is non safety-related at CCNPP based on an analysis showing that maximum post-loss-of-coolant accident charcoal bed temperature will not cause iodine desorption or charcoal bed ignition.

In Modes 5 and 6, the dousing system is available to provide fire protection in order to support certain l

maintenance activities.

NRC Ouestion No. 5.(h5 Are there any parts of the systems, structures, or components described in Section 5.6 that are inaccessible for inspection? If so, describe what aging management program will be relied upon to maintain the integrity of the inaccessible areas. If the aging management program for the inaccessible areas is an evaluation of the acceptability of inaccessible areas based on conditions found in surrounding accessible areas, please provide information to show that conditims would exist in accessible areas that would indicate the presence of or result in degradation to such inaccessible areas. If different aging effects or aging management techniques are needed for the inaccessible areas, please provide a summary to address the following elements for the inaccessible areas: (1) Preventive actions that will mitigate or prevent aging degradation; (2) Parameters monitored or inspected relative to degradation of specific structure and component intended functions; (3) Detection of aging effects before loss of structure and component intended functions; (4) Monitoring, trending, inspection, testing frequency, and sample size to ensure timely detection of aging effects and corrective actions; (5) Acceptance criteria to ensure structure and component intended functions; and (6) Operating experience that provides objective I

evidence to demonstrate that the effects of aging will be adequately managed.

I 2

)

. ~ -.

ATTACHMENT (1)

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION;

[

, ' INTEGRATED PLANT ASSESSMENT REPORT FORTHE CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM BGE Response Baltimore Gas and Electric Company can access all Containmua :ipray System components if

- required.

1 m

l l

4 l

3 t