ML20155G833
| ML20155G833 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 09/18/1998 |
| From: | William Reckley NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155G837 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9811090220 | |
| Download: ML20155G833 (6) | |
Text
-
.~
O O
7590-01-P UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC..
DOCKET NOS. 50-313 AND 50-368 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE. UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission)is considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its regulations for Facility Operating License Nos.
DPR-51 and NPF-6 issued to Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), for operation of Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 (ANO-1 and ANO-2), located in Pope County, Arkansas.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Identification of Procosed Action:
The proposed action would exempt the licensee from the requirements of 10 CFR 70.24(a) as it pertains to the handling and storage of unirradiated fuel at ANO-1 and ANO-2.
The requirements of 10 CFR 70.24(a) include (1) having a monitoring system that will energize clear audible alarms if accidental criticality occurs in each area in which special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored and (2) having emergency procedures and conducting related drills to familiarize personnel with the evacuation plan, for each area in which this licensed special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's application for exemption dated October 31,1997.
The Need for the Procosed Action:
The purpose of 10 CFR 70.24 is to ensure that if a criticality event (or accident) were to occur during the handling of special nuclear material, personnel would be alerted to that fact 9811090220 980918 PDR ADOCK 05000313 P
pm
O O
2 and would take appropriate action. At a commercial nuclear power plant the inadvertent criticality with which 10 CFR 70.24 is concemed could occur during fuel handling operations.
The special nuclear material that could be assembled into a critical mass at a commercial nuclear power plant is in the form of nuclear fuel; the quantity of other forms of special nuclear material that is stored on site in any given location is small enough to preclude achieving a critical mass. Because the fuelis not enriched beyond 5.0 weight percent Uranium-235 and because commercial nuclear plant licensees have procedures and design features that prevent inadvertent criticality, the staff has determined that it is unlikely that an inadvertent criticality j
could occur due to the handling of special nuclear material at a commercial power reactor. The requirements of 10 CFR 70.24, therefore, are not necessary to ensure the safety of personnel during the i
handling of special nuclear materials at commercial power reactors.
Environmentalimoacts of the Procosed Action:
The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that there is no significant environmentalimpact if the exemption is granted. Inadvertent or accidental criticality will be precluded through compliance with the ANO-1 and ANO-2 Technical Specifications (TSs), the design of the new fuel storage area, and administrative controls Imposed on fuel handling procedures. TSs requirements specify reactivity limits for new fuel l
assemblies and key design features for the new fuel storage racks, including the minimum spacing between the unirradiated fuel assemblies.
Appendix A of 10 CFR Part 50," General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,"
Criterion 62, requires the criticality in the fuel storage and handling system shall be prevented by physical systems or processes, preferably by use of geometrically safe configurations. This is met at ANO 1 and ANO-2, as identified in the TSs and the Updated Safety Analysis Reports
O O
3 (USARs). The TSs for storage racks and limits on fuel enrichment for ANO-1 and ANO-2 are such that the ratio of neutron production to neutron absorption and leakage (k-effective) will not exceed 0.98 assuming optimum moderation by an aqueous foam and will not exceed 0.95 when the storage area is flooded with unborated water.
The proposed exemption would not result in any significant radiological impacts. The l
proposed exemption would not affect radiological plant effluents since the handling and storage of new fuel does not impact the normal operations of the plant that generate radioactive wastes and design and administrative controls previously described provide adequate controls to preclude accidental releases from an inadvertent criticality. The proposed exemption would not cause any significant occupational exposures since the TSs, design controls (including geometric spacing of fuel assembly storage spaces) and administrative controls preclude inadvertent criticality. Existing programs at ANO-1 and ANO-2 also provide reasonable confidence that personnel would be alerted to and would know how to respond to a radiological accident involving the handling and storage of fuel assemblies. The amount of radioactive waste would not be changed by the proposed exemption.
The proposed exemption does not result in any significant nonradiological environmental impacts. The proposed exemption involves features located entirely within the restricted area I
as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. It does not affect non radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Altematives to the Prooosed Action:
Since the Commission has concluded that there is no measurable environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any attematives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed exemption, the staff 1
y 1.-
.w-
+
g---,+-.
ym,w-y-y-T-ew
-ye,m yge is-7
-e wwvvi-
O O
4 considered denial of the requested exemption (no-action altemative). Denial of the request would result in no change in current environmentalimpacts. The environmentalimpacts of the proposed action and the attemative action are similar.
i Allemative Use of Resources:
This action does not involve the use of any resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2.
Aaencias and Persons Consulted:
In accordance with its stated policy, on August 19,1998, the staff consulted with Mr. Bernie Bevell, Director, Division of Radiation Control and Emergency Management, regarding the environmentalimpact of the proposed action. The State official had no t
l=
comments.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT l
Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes that the l
proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepara an environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
l For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the licensee's letter dated l
October 31,1997, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 1
P I
i
. ~... ~ -
O O
t 5
Room, which is located at The Gelman Building,2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room located at the Tomlinson Library, Arkansas Tech University, Russellville, AR 72801.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of September 1998.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.l Q
N Qs William D. Reckley, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate IV-1 Division of Reactor Projects ill/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation t
1 l
l l
r 1
4
DISTRIBUTION:
be'
<0selet.Fihrt PDIV-1 r/f l
CHawes WReckley i
l September 21, 1998
- MEMORANDUM TO:
Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration j
. FROM:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j
1 l
SUBJECT:
EN1TRGY OPERATIONS, INC. - ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE.. UNITS 142 l
r One signed original of the FederalRegister Notice identified below is attached for your transmittal to the Office of the Federal Register for publication. Additional conformed copies (Five ) of the Notice are enclosed for your use.
Notice of Receipt of Application for Construction Permit (s) and Operating License (s).
l Notice of Receipt of Partial Application for Construction Permit (s) and Facility License (s):
1 Time for submission of Views on Antitrust matters.
l Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License. (Call with 30-day insert date).
Notice of Receipt of Application for Facility License (s): Notice of Availability of Applicant's j
Environmental Report; and. Notice of Consideration of !ssuance of Facility License (s) and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing.
Notice of Availability of NRC Draft / Final Environmental Statement.
i Notice of Limited Work Authorization.
Notice of Availability of Safety Evaluation Report.
C Notice of issuance of Construction Permit (s).
Notice of issuance of Facility Operating License (s) or Amendment (s).
Order.
Exemption.
Notice of Granting Exemption.
Environmental Assessment.
Notice of Preparation of Environmental Assessment.
C Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206.
Issuance of Final Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206.
Other:
DOCKET NOs.
50-313 and 50-368 L
Attachment (s): As stated
Contact:
W. Reckley
- Telephone:
415-1314~
DOCUMENT NAME: ARMA1278.EA To receive a copy of thie docurnent, indicate in the box: *C* = Copy without attachtnent/ enclosure
'E' = Copy with ettachment/ enclosure
- N' = No copy l'
OFFICE LA/PD4-1l l
l l
l l
1 NAME CHawes C//)#
DATE 09/2 / /98 OFFICIAL RtiCORD COPY
.