ML20155F891

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Monthly Operating Rept for May 1988 for Fort Calhoun Station
ML20155F891
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/1988
From: Andrews R, Blessie W, Gates W
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
LIC-88-510, NUDOCS 8806170095
Download: ML20155F891 (8)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

AVERAGE DAILY UNIT POWER LEVEL DOCKET N0. 50-285 UNIT Fort Calhoun Station DATE June 6. 1988 COMPLETED BY W. J. Blessie TELEPHONE 402-536-4595 MONTH May 1988 DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Net) (MWe-Net) 1 457.0 17 479.8 2 457.2 18 479.3 3 474.8 19 478.1 4 478.6 20 476.5 5 480.5 21 475.0 6 479.4 22 476.1 7 476.7 23 477.8 8 475.7 24 477.8 9 476.2 25 476.6 10 476.9 26 475.5 11 481.5 27 475.2 12 480.3 28 473.9 13 479.6 29 472.8 14 479.5 30 472.0 15 479.5 31 471.4 16 479.7 INSTRUCTIONS '

On this format, list the average daily unit power level in MWe-Net for each day in the reporting month. Compute to the nearest whole megawatt.

l egq61 oo95 esos31 R DOCK 050002e5 DCD

OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO. 50-285 UNIT Fort Calhoun Station DATE June 6. 1988 COMPLETED BY W. J. Blessie TELEPHONE 402-536-4595  !

OPERATING STATUS

1. Unit Name: Fort Calhoun Station Notes
2. Reporting Period: May 1988
3. Licensed Thermal Power (MWt): 1500
4. NameplateRating(GrossMWe): 502
5. DesignElectricalRating(NetMWe): 478 l
6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): 502
7. 478
8. MaximumDependableCapacity(NetMWe)(:

If changes occur in Capacity Ratings Items Number 3 Through 7) Since Last ,

Give Reasons: l N/A i

9. PowerLeveltoWhichRestricted,IfAny(NetMWe): N/A  !
10. Reasons for Restrictions, If Any: l l

This Month Yr-to-Date Cumulative

11. Hours in Reporting Period 744.0 3647.0 128.713.0 l
12. Number of Hours Reactor Was Critical 744.0 3647.0 100.486.8  ;
13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.0 0.0 1.309.5  ;
14. Hours Generator On-Line 744.0 3647.0 99.56Lj___ '
15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours 0.0 0.0 0.0
16. GrossThermalEnergyGenerated(MW) 1.107.622.1 4.858.478.1 129.406.103.3
17. Gross Electrical Energy Generated WH) 370.744.0 1.645.782.0 42.618.703.2
18. NetElectricalEnergyGenerated( ) 354.019.2 1.564.795.9 40.708.878.7
19. Unit Service Factor 100.0 100.0 77.4
20. Unit Availability Factor 100.0 100.0 77.4 21 Factor (UsingMDCNet) 99.5 89 1 , 68.6
22. Unit Capacity Factor (Using DER Net) 99.5 89.8 66.8
23. Unit Forced Outage Rate 0.0 0.0 3.0
24. ShutdownsScheduledOverNext6 Months (Type,Date,andDurationofEach):

The 1988 Refuelino $hutdown is tentatively scheduled for September 2. 1988 with startuo tentatively scheduled for November 18. 1988.

25. If Shut Down at End of Report Period, Estimated Date of Startup: N/A
26. UnitsInTestStatus(PriortoCommercialOperation: Forcast Achieved INITIAL CRITICALITY INITIAL ELECTRICITY N/A COM4ERCIAL OPERATION

.~

DOCKET NO. 50-285 -

UNIT SHUTDOWNS AND POWER REDUCTIONS ~

D Jn 61 COMPLETED BYLJ_ B1euie REPORT MONTH May 1988 TFIFPHONE (402) 536-4595 e

a _ B 1p $a

  • $ h uoenee. 5'
  • cause & correathre No. Date 3 K Event i Action to 2 - g  ; Report , ao o F,e.or,t m enoe There were no unit shutdowns or power reductions during the month af May 1988.

1 2 3 4 F-Forced Reasorc Methost Exhbit G - Instructions S-SMw A-Equipenent Falure (Explain) Hannual for Preparation of Data B-Mahtenance or Test 2-Manual Scram Entry Sheets for Uoensee C-Hefuears 3-AutomaMc Scrasn Event Report E.EM FBe NM D-Reculatory Restriction 4-Other (Explaini E-Operator Training & Ucense Exarnination 6 F-Adninistrat!ve Exhbit 1 - Sasno Source G-Operational Error H-Other (Expleh) 19/77)

Refueling Information Fort Calhoun - Unit No. 1 Report for the month ending May 1988 .

1. Scheduled date for next refueling shutdown. Seotember 1988
2. Scheduled date for restart following refueling. November 1988
3. Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment? 'Yes
a. If answer is yes, what, in general, will these be?

Incorporate cycle specific requirements resulting from reload safety analysis,

b. If answer is no, has the reload fuel design and core configuration been reviewed by your Plant Safety Review Committee to deter-mine whether any unreviewed safety questions are associated with the core reload,
c. If no such review has taken place, when is it scheduled?
4. Scheduled date(s) for submitting proposed licensing action and support information. July 1988
5. Important licensing considerations associated with refueling, e.g., new or different fuel design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in fuei design, new operating procedures.
6. The number of fuel assemblies: a) in the core 133 assemblies i b) in the spent fuel pool 393 "

I c) spent fuel pool i storage capacity 729 "

d) planned spent fuel pool May be increased "

storage capacity via fuel oin "

consolidation )

7. The projected date of the last refueling that can be dischargad to the spent fuel pool assuming the present licensed capacity. 1994*
  • Full core offload of 133 assemblies lost.

Prepared by MN Date June 14. 1988

DMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT Fort Calhoun Station Unit No. 1 May 1988 Monthly Operations Report I. OPERATIONS

SUMMARY

Fort Calhoun Station operated at 100% power throughout - month of May 1988. Construction continues on the training facilit arehouse, and maintenance shop.

Annual NRC license simulator requalification training at Combustion Engineering in Windsor, Connecticut, was completed during May. An NRC security inspection was performed during May.

No safety valves or PORY challenges or failures occurred.

A. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS None B. CHANGES IN OPERATING METHODS None C. RESULTS OF SURVEILLANCE TESTS AND INSPECTIONS None D. CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS CARRIED OUT WITHOUT COMMISSION APPROVAL Procedure Description SP-STR0KE-1 In Service Testing of Air Operated, CQE Valves.

This procedure did not constitute ,an unreviewed safety question as defined by 10CFR50.59 because it only allowed stroke testing to be conducted on 39 air operated CQE valves. The objective of the testing is to determine if valve operability was degraded (or is degrading) due to the intrusion of water into the instrument air system. This testing did not in any way compromisa plant safety, but enhanced it by ensuring operability of safety related valves.

l

Monthly 00erations Report

.May 1988

'Page Two D. CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS CARRIED OUT WITHOUT COMMISSION APPROVAL (Continued)

System Acceptance Committee Packages for April 1988:

Packaoe DescriDtion/ Analysis EEAR FC-85-026 Installation of Overhead Lighting in Water Plant.

This modification provided for the installation of four light fixtures in the area of alum and lime pumps and feeders, along the east wall from the door to the C02 injector. The addition of these light fixtures will enhance the lighting in the area described above to an acceptable footcandle level. This modification does not have an adverse effect on the safety analysis.

E. RESULTS OF LEAK RATE TESTS None F. CHANGES IN PLANT OPERATING STAFF None G. TRAINING During May, simulator requalification training and evaluation for all licensed operators and STAS was completed and an initial Reactor Operator class commenced. The training 3rogram for Central Maintenance was issued and training on t1e 10CFR50.59 procedure was conducted.

H. CHANGES, TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS REQUIRING NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO 10CFR50.59 Amendment No. Description 113 The amendment would allow the licensee to use annualaverage(ratherthanreal-time) meteorological dispersion factors to calculate doses, and corrects and clarifies sor.se parts of Technical Specifications 2.9.1 and 5.9.4.

7.____....~_

1 l, .

n I. .

Monthly Operations Report May 1988 Page Three-II. MAINTENANCE (Significant Safety Related)

- flone

. T. l W. Gary Gates Manager-Fort Calhoun Station 4

4

? 9 PW - g $' feSM- T Try'*"'"N=-frPM-tt*T-$*WtT = -g e e "qq t-g p w w-'Jpg v g -wg4 qqiM fe r quet.<+@w T er*g W m w*+g gy-We 9 w

  • s -P-p*G T-h1f'rWwo % w w 9WM wsw +N WWFDwe pser ve swwe t-e -e e -e g N ww- w-

l -

Ombha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha, Neoraska 68102-2247 402/536 4000 l

June 14, 1988 LIC-88-510 l

i U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Document C0ntrol Desk l Mail Station P1-137 Washington, DC 20555

Reference:

Docket No. 50-285 I Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

May Monthly Operating Report l

Pursuant to Technical Specification Section 5.9.1, and 10 CFR Part 50.4(b)(1), I please find enclosed, one copy of the May 1988 Monthly Operating Report for the Fort Calhoun Station Unit No. 1.

l Sincerely, Ql.,\)wulalo-R. L. Andrews l Oivision Manager l Nuclear Production RLA/me Enclosures c: P. H. Harrell - NRC Senior Resident Inspector NRC Regional Office OfficeofManagement&ProgramAnalysis(2)

R. M. Caruso - Combustion Engineering i R. J. Simon - Westinghouse Nuclear Safety Analysis Center INP0 Records Center American Nuclear Insurers l NRC File (FCS) l ggY 3

a

\

455124 Employment with Equal Opportunity Wtle Female

.-.