ML20155F313

Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1), Equipment Classification. Item 2.1 Considered Resolved

ML20155F313
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	06/06/1988
From:	Scott W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Berry K CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20155F317	List: ML20155F313 ML20155F351
References
GL-83-28, TAC-52819, NUDOCS 8806160344
Download: ML20155F313 (3)

Text

_ ,_

. June 6, 1988.

Docket No. 50-155 DISTRIBUTION DEBilRREF EJORDAN Mr. Kenneth W. Berry HRC & LOCAL PDRs JPARTLOW Director, Nuclear Licensing PD31 GRAY FILE ACRS (10)

Consumers Power Company GHOLAHAN 1945 West Parnall Road RINGRAM Jackson, Michigan 49201 'WSCOTT OGC

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATION FOR GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.1 (PART 1) ,

EQUIPMENT CLASSIFICATION (TAC NO. 52819)

Re: Big Rock Point Plant By Generic Letter 83-28 dated July 8, 1983, you were requested to respond to certain generic concerns that developed from the investigation into the failure of scram circuit breakers at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1. These concerns are categorized into four areas: (Item 1) Post Trip Review; (Item 2) Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface; (item 3) Post-Maintenance Testing; and (Item

4) Reactor Trip System Reliability Improvements. Your response to these four areas of Generic Letter 83-28 was provided by letters dated November 7, 1983, .

February 2,1984, October 2,1984, June 1,1984, June 28,1984, August 16, 1985, and April 22, 1987.

We have completed our review of your responses to Item 2.1 (Part 1) of Generic Letter 83-28 relating to confirmation that all components whose functioning is required to trip the reactor are identified as safety-related on af plant documentation and in information handling systerrs that are used,to control all activities performed on this safety-related equipment. The results of our review are provided in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. Based on our review, we find that your Eqaipment Qualification requirements meet the requirements of Generic Letter 83-28 and are, therefore, acceptable. We consider Item 2.1 (Part 1) resolved. ,

Sincerely, DJh00gpgOy  !

Wayne E. Scott, Jr. , Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects III, IV, V

& Special Projects Enclosure Safety Evaluation i cc w/ enclosure:

See attached 1 R k $/ } /88 $/j/88 j 8806160344 880606' PDR ADOCK 05000155 p PPR l

e .

[ o

~g UNITED STATES g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, [ WASHINGTON. D. C. 20655 5 ;j June 6, 1988

/

Docket No. 50-155 Mr. Kenneth W. Gerry Director, Nuclear Licensing Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

SUBJECT:

SAFETY F. VALUATION FOR GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 2.1 (PART 1)

EQUIPMEPT CLASSIFICATION (TAC NO. 52819)

Re: Big Rock Point Plant By Generic Letter 8b 28 dated July 8, 1983, you were requested to respond to certain generic concerns that developed from the investigation into the failure of ; cram circuit breakers at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1. These concerns are categorized into four areas: (Item 1) F'ost Trip Review; (Item 2) Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface; (Item 3) Post-Maintenance Testing; and (Item

4) Reactor Trip System Reliability Improvements. Your response to these four areas of Generic Letter 83-28 was provided by letters dated November 7,1983, February 2,1984, October 2,1984, June 1,1984, June 28,1984, August 16, 1985, and April 22, 1987.

We have completed our review of your responses to Item 2.1 (Part 1) of Generic Letter 83-28 relating to confirmation that all components whose functioning is required to trip the reactor are identified as safety-related on all plant documentation and in information handling systems that are used to control all activities performed on this safety-related equipment. The results of our review are provided in the enclosed Safety Evaluation. Based on our review, we find that your Equipment Qualification requirements meet the requirements of Generic Letter 83-28 and are, therefore, acceptable. We consider Item 2.1 (Part 1) resolved. '

Sincerely, Y f Wayne E. Scott, Jr., Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V  ;

& Special Projects Enclosure i Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:

See attached

Mr. Kenneth W. Berry V Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant cc:

Mr. Thomas A. McNish, Secretary Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Judd L. Bacon, Esquire Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Mr. Thomas W. Elward Plant Manager Big Rock Point Plant 10269 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Mr. Bud Heeres County Commissioner 303 Sheridan Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Office of the Governor Room 1 - Capitol Building Lansing, Michigar. 48913 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ]

i 799 Roosevelt Road l Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office i Division of Radiological Health '

P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j Resident Inspector Office '

Big Rock Point Plant 10253 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, Michigan 49720

_. _ _ . _ _ __ ._ - - . . - - ,