ML20155D602

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Request for Addl Info for Review of FSAR Amend 35
ML20155D602
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 10/03/1988
From: Hopkins J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hairston W
GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
TAC-67850, NUDOCS 8810110314
Download: ML20155D602 (4)


Text

"

October 3, 1988 Docket No.-

50-425 Mr. W. G. Hairstor,, Ill Senior Vice President -

Nuclear Operations Georgia Power Co.?pany P. O. Box 4545 Atlanto, GA 30302 Cear Mr. Hairston:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON FSAR AMENDMENT 35 (TAC 67850)

The NRC staff is reviewing FSAR omendments 35, 36, and 37 and finds that it needs additional information (enclosed) to assist in its review, Contact me if you have any questions.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirenents contained in this letter offect fewer than ten respondents; thi.refore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

/s' /

Jon B. Hopkins, Praject Manager Project Directorate II-3 Division of Reactor Projects - I/I!

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

See next page DISTRIEUTiON Docket file Lucal POR NRC POR PD!l-3 Reading S. Vargo 14-E-4 G. Lainas 14-H-3 D. Motthews M. Rood J. Hopkins E. Jorden MNBB-33J2

8. Grir:es 9-A-2 ACRS(10)

H-1016 V0GTLE PLANT FILE l

m\\\\

T(pl l

P0Ji 3*

-)PDII-3*

PD1l-3 I

3 TWJ6d CMatthews C

09/29/88 }JHupkins: sw g

10/03/88

(( / 's /88 1

  • See previous concurrence i

es10110314 se1003.

EDR ADOCK 0500 R

1 Mr. W. G. Hairston, III Georgia Power Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant cc:

Mr. J. P. Kane Resident inspector Manager of Licensing and Engineering Nuclear Regulatory Cormission Georgio Power Company P.O. Box 572 P.O. Box 4545 Wayiiesboro, Georgia 30830 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Deppish Kirkland, III, Counsel Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Office of the Consuners' Utility Executive Cunsultant Council Southern Corrpany Services, Inc.

Suite 225 P.O. Box 2625 32 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Mr. Paul D. F ice Jarnes E. Joiner Vice President & Project Director Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman, Georgia Power Company

& Ashnore Post Office Box 282 1400 Candler Building Waynesboro, Georgia 30830 127 Peachtree Street, N.E.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. J. A, Bailey Project Licensing Manager Danny Feig Southern Corrpany Services, Inc.

1130 Alta Avenue P.O. Box 2625 Atlanta, Georgia 30307 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Carol Stangler Ernest L. Blake, Jr.

Georgiar>s Against Nuclear Energy Bruce W. Churchill, Esq.

425 Euclid Terrace Show, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge Atlanta, Georgia 30307 2300 N Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C.

20037 Mr. R. P. Mcdonald Executive Vice President -

Mr. G. Bockhold, Jr.

Nuclear Operations General Manager Nuclear Operations Georgia Power Company Georgia Power Company P.O. Box 4545 P.O. Box 1600 Atlanta, Georgia 30302 Wayr,esboro, Georgia 30830 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ;ormission 101 Marietta Street, N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 J

7-ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INF0rdtAT!0N V0GTLE FSAR AMENDMENT 35 1

i Quality Assurance (Section 17.2) 1.

The QC superintendent's reporting relationships were deleted from 1

Sections 17.2.1.1.3 and 17.2.10.

Clarify where the GPC QC superintendent j

reports.

l t

]

2.

Section 17.2.1.4 previously made it clear that the 00AP was expressly addressed in the manual which governed activities within the SCS work scope. Clarify whether this is still true in the Plant Vogtle Operational Support Policy and Procedures Manual.

3.

The comitment that Bechtel activities were governed by the BPC VEGP huclear QA Department Procedores Manual and Vogtle Project Reference Manual was deleted from Section 17.2.1.4 Under what manual (s) does Bechtel now operate?

J,,

4 Section 17.2.1.4 has added the statement that "EEPC maintains technical engineering oversight of VEGP Unit 1 until VEGP Unit 2 achieves

(

com.ercial operation". Clarify what organization has this responsibility af ter Unit 2 achieves comercial operation.

1 S.

Sections 170.0 and 17C.S no longer indicate that the SCS QA Department is the SCS organization that supports the SCS PQAE and SSA. Ciarify what i

support is supplied by what SCS organizations in this regard.

4

~

6.

FSAR Amendment 35 deleted Sections 17C.1.3.1 and 17C.1.3.3 which described the duties and responsibilities of the manager - project and supplier and the supervisor - projects, respectively. Clarify who, by position titic, now has these duties and responsibilities.

7.

per Section 17C.1.2.1.1 of FSAR Amendment 35, the pQAE now "controls the implementation of supplier quality activities by approval of the annual evaluations of suppliers' quality program performance and approval of changes in the scope of supplier surveillance." Describe how these approvals (that is, of the anneal evaluatiuns and of supplier surveillance scope changes) control the implementation of supplier quality activities.

8.

Section 17C.1.2.1.1.F assigns the PQAE the task of evaluating "the need for annual audit" of Bechtel's procurement supplier quality department.

Clarify that such audits are performed at least triennially.

9.

The Supplier Surveillance Adminstrator (SSA) no longer receives functional direction (that is, the SSA is no longer part of) SCS's quality assurance organization, although Section 17C.1.3.1 indicates that the SSA's duties and responsibilities are still quality assurance duties and responsibilities. We note that one result of this change is reflected in the last paragraph of 17C.5 which indicates that the 505 quality assurance department no longer audits suppliers as this is now done by SCS procurement - engineered prcducts. Justify this change in the reporting relationship of the SSA.