ML20155A672

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880330-0502.Violation Noted:Control Room HVAC Sys Actuated & Not Reported to NRC within 4 H

ML20155A672
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	05/23/1988
From:	Zimmerman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20155A670	List: IR 05000312/1988012 ML20155A667 ML20155A672
References
50-312-88-12, NUDOCS 8806100185
Download: ML20155A672 (1)

Text

__ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Sacramento Municipal Utility District Docket No. 50-312 P. O. Box 15830 License No. DPR-54 During an NRC inspection conducted on March 30 through May 2, 1988 a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C, the violation is listed below:

10CFR50.72(b)(2)(ii) states,inpart:

"(b) Non emergency events ....

(2) Four-hour reports. ...the licensee shall notify the NRC as soon as practical and in all cases, within four hours of the occurrence of any of the following:

(ii) Any event or condition that results in manual or automatic actuation of any Engineered Safety Feature (ESF)...."

Contrary to the above on April 11, 1988, at 2:38 p.m., the control room essential heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system, an Engineered Safety Feature, was actuated and was not reported to the NRC within four hours.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, The Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555 with a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector, Anthony D'Angelo, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a "Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not be modified, ,

suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper shnuld not be taken. Consideration may be given to extending the response time for good cause shown.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION R. P. Zi @.an, Chief Reactor Pfojects Branch Dated at Walnut Creek, Cailfsenia this a3 g day of Wa.q 1988 cf 8806100185 880523 PDR ADOCK 05000312 Q DCD

- . _ _