ML20154S354

Ack Receipt of in Response to 850307 FOIA Request for 35 Documents.Expresses Disbelief That NRC Does Not Possess Item 2, Attachment a to GE License Condition 9. Search of 1984 & 1985 Files Requested

ML20154S354
Person / Time
Site:	07001113
Issue date:	06/27/1985
From:	Ratner M RATNER, M.G.
To:	Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
FOIA-85-158 NUDOCS 8604010082
Download: ML20154S354 (2)

Text

.~:a.w\\.=

~.-,,.a

.w.w. ~ ~.~.~..~ -.~.

o- - -

y.

- L AW OFFICES MOZART G. RATNER, P. C.

1900 M STREET, N. W.

SulTE 600 ARCA CODC 202 WASHI NGTON. D. C. 2 O O36 June 27, 1985 4

4 Mr.

J.

M.

Felton, Director Divison of Rules and Records Office of Administration i

U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555

)

Re:

FOIA-85-158

Dear Mr. Felton:

I am in receipt of your-letter of June 21, 1985, in partial response to my letter dated March ~7, 1985, requesting 35 specified documents, l

The last sentence' of your letter says that NRC is not in possession of the following documents listed in my request:

1 Nos. 2, 9, 11, 17, 21-33.

For the reasons stated in my letter i

of this date in re FOIA-85-158A, third paragraph, I cannot conceive that NRC dorts not have possession of' item 2,

" Attachment A to G.E. 's License Condition No.

9,"

inasmuch as NRC must have all portions of G.E. 's application for renewal of its License SNM-1097 in 1984, which necessarily contains Appendix A.

The same is true of item 31.

If our identification of these doucments is somehow technically inaccurate, please advise us how Lou refer to them, so that we may request Appendix A and item 31 in appropriate technical 1

terminology.

4 Item 9, information submitted by G.E.

to NRC, is requested in Biddinger's letter of 9/17/84 to Vaughan.

We 1

cannot conceive that G.E.

did not submit - the material i

requested.

Again, perhaps the problem is identification.

Item l

17, a report referred to as having been submitted by G.E.

to i

NRC, may likewise have been refered to inaccurately or inadequately.

Please search your 1984 and 1985 files for this.

Inasmuch as my request has been 'pending since March 7, 1985, and is relevant to the current 2.206, proceeding before 8604010082 850627 PDR FOIA RATPER85-158 PDR i

/

mww ;5rwy,

,s e..-

Mr. J. M.

Felton June 27, 1985 Page 2 the I & E Director, I would appreciate a reply to this letter as soon as possible.

I Very truly yours, I

4 Mozart G.

Ratner MGR/hej 4

4 f

i e

J 1

)

f J

t

y a

L Am OFFICE 5 MOZART G. RATNER. P. C.

1900 W ST R E E T, N. W.

SulTE SiO P

W A S H I P. G T O N. O C. P O O'3 6 Ant A coot not March 7, 1985 F REED 0b'. OF INFORMAllOh Mr. Joseph Felton, Director ACT REQUEST Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration Fora /58 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.

C.

20555 Iteud03/06/fW SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST Vera M.

English, by her undersigned counsel, hereby supplements her " Request for Production of Documents Pursuant to 10 CFR S 2.790(6) and Request for Commission lassification Under Part 9, App. 2 (10 CFR 195-196)," dated February 25, 1985, by the following items:

1.

Letter from O'Reilly to Vaughan, dated 7/30/84 reporti'ng summary of "our meeting in Atlanta," referred to in Vaughan to O'Reilly letter of 10/29/84.

2.

Attachment A to G.E.'s. License Condition No. 9 (G.E. Lic.

SNM-1097).

3.

Attachment to Vaughan te Stohr letter of 6/7/84, pertaining to items of apparent non-compliance with NRC requirements.

4.

Attachments 1 and 2 referred to in'6/15/84 Vaughan to O'Reilly letter.

5.

Appendix A referred to in Gibson to Long letter of 11/4/81, re: 70-1113/81-14.

6.

Inspection Report 82-07, referred to in 4/8/82 letter from Gibson to Long.

7.

Inspection Report 81-14 referred to in 4/2/82 letter from Olshinski to Long.

8.

Inspection Report 82-09 referred to in 4/13/82 letter from Gibson to Long.

(McAlpine signed the above-referenced letter for

{

t /J3lQ, S&5 Gibson.)

gf yW-

,e en Mr. Joseph Felton March 7, 1985 Page 2 9.

Information submitted pursuant to 9/17/84 letter from Biddinger to Vaughan.

10. Inspection Report 84-11, dated 10/8/84, referred to in Vaughan to O'Reilly letter of 11/15/84 and response thereto, dated 12/9/84.

11. All records of changes in facilities and procedures in the Chemet Laboratory from January 1, 1982 to March 15, 1985, filed with Region II, pursuant to 10 CFR S 50.59(b).

12. General Electric Company's Revised License Application pages dated 6/20/84, revising its 7/25/83 License Application - Chapter I - 3.6 to 3.7.

13. Ibid.

1-5.15, I-5.9 to 5.13.

14. Ibid.

1-3.1, I-3.4, I-4.1, I-4.4.

15. Standard Format & Content for Radiological Contingency Plans for Fuel Cycle & Materials Facilities, NUREG-0762, referred to in 12/31/81 Fisher to Vaughan letter.

16. Standard Review Plan for the review of Radiological Contingency Plans for Fuel Cycle & Material Facilities, NUREG-0810, referred to in letter referenced in Item 7, above.

17. Report submitted to Fuel Facilities Safeguards and Licensing Branch pertaining to Fundamental Nuclear Control l

Plan, discussing the investigation and resolution of the discrepancies between 1983 and 1984 factors for six material categories.

l

18. G.E.

License Condition 2.1 of Amendment MPP-3, referred to in 9/28/84 letter from Brown to Vaughan about revision of License Condition 2.1.

19. Update of " Criticality" Emergency Procedure effective 12/26/83 and referred to in 9/25/84 memorandum from Terry to Crow.

20. ANSI ANS-8.1-1983, described in request for additional information for UPMP Amendment Application dated June 1, 1984 and attached to Biddinger to Vaughan letter of 9/14/84.

e

Mr. Joseph Felton March 7, 1985 Page 3

21. Plant Procedure (P/P) Calibration and Operation Instruction (COI) 6, Rev. 1, Control of Samples in Chemet Lab, referred to in 70-1113-Inspection Report 84/17, p.

4, paragraph d.

22. Nuclear Safety Release 6.1.0. - Radiology Safety Regulations for Chemet Lab, original and all revisions, including Rev. 4 (ibid., p.

4, 1 d).

23. Plant Procedure Nuclear Safety Instruction 0-6.0 and all revisions, including Rev. 14 (ibid., p. 5, 1 f).

24. G.E.'s Chemical Metallurgical and Spectrochemical Laboratory Manual, Rev. 5, 8/25/82 (ibid., p.

8, 1 j).

25. Plant Procedure Nuclear Safety Instruction E-6.0, and all revisions, including Rev. 11 (ibid., p.

12, T n).

26. Plant Procedure & Practices 40-19, Bioassay Program (ibid.,

p.

13, 1 n) l

27. Nuclear Safety Release 0.2.0, Bioassay Urinanalysis Program, including Appendix A (ibid., p.

13, 1 n).

i

28. Revisions 1 and 2 to Calibration & Operation Instruction (COI) 409, (Revision 2 dated 7/25/84) (ibid, p.

15, t o).

29. All staff evaluation reports of G.E. committees filed with NRC between 1/1/80 and 3/13/85.

30. All PRODS filed with NRC between 1/19/84 and 3/17/85.

31. Uranium Process Management Project Application Amendment, dated June 1, 1984

32. All P/P's filed with NRC from January, 1984 to March 11, i

1985.

33. January, 1984 Memorandum concerning NRC Region II comments or G.E. 's application for renewal of SNM-1097, referred to in 4/12/84 Memorandum from Page to Cunningham.

1 I

)

\\

l Mr. Joseph Felton March 7, 1985, Page 4

34. NRC Inspection Report 70-1113/83-28 and Notice of Violation dated 10/31/83, referred to in Stohr to Long letter, dated 6/22/84.

35. G.E.'s 6/7/84 response to NRC's 10/31/83 Notice of Violation referred to in Stohr to Long letter dated 6/22/84.

Since the trial is scheduled to resume March 18, 1985, we respectfully urge your prompt action in response to this request.

Very truly yours, 3

Moz t G.

Ratner cc:

James Lieberman, Esq.

Neal Abrams, Esq.

F.C. Shomaker, Esq.

1 4

r,---

-r,e e +,, -

-,-----,,aw e-e m-w

~

,,