ML20154R666
| ML20154R666 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant |
| Issue date: | 10/19/1998 |
| From: | Toelle S UNITED STATES ENRICHMENT CORP. (USEC) |
| To: | Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| References | |
| GDP-98-0219, GDP-98-219, NUDOCS 9810270135 | |
| Download: ML20154R666 (22) | |
Text
.
USEC A Global Energy Company October 19,1998 GDP 98-0219 Dr. Carl J. Paperiello Director, Oflice of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Attention: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP)
Docket No. 70-7001 Certificate Amendment Request - Update the Applicatian Safety Analysis Report - Proposed Changes
Dear Dr. Paperiello:
By letter dated October 31,1997 (Reference 1), USEC submitted a certificate amendment request (CAR) containing the Safety Analysis Report Update (S ARUP) required by Issue 2 of DOE /ORO-2026," Plan for Achieving Compliance with NRC Regulations at the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant" (the Compliance Plan), for NRC review and approval. By letter dated March 31, 1998 l
(Reference 2), USEC submitted proposed changes to the SARUP certificate amendment request.
This letter provides additional changes to the SARUP certificate amendment request.
USEC's October 31,1997 letter (Enclosure 1, Table 1, item 3) contained the following commitment that required SARUP changes and a response to the NRC:
Codes and Standards for Process Building Cranes Appendix A of SAR Chapter I will be updated to reflect the extent to which the design and inspection of cell floor process building cranes (and associated lifting fixtures) satisfy applicable industry codes and standards. Necessary changes to SAR Chapter 1, Appendix A, will be submitted to the NRC by October 19,1998.
As shown in the attached changes, SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A, has been revised to apply the same sections ofstandard ANSI B30.2 that are currently applied to the liquid UF cylinder handling 6
cranes to the four process building cranes that are normally parked over cascade equipment (see the discussion in SARUP Section 3.15.9.2).
,g g t
9810270135 981019 pY PDR ADOCK 07007001 C
PDR; 6903 Rocidedge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817-1818 a
Telephone 301-564-3200 Fax 301-564-3201 http://www.usec.com Offices in Livermore, CA Paducah, KY Portsmouth, OH Washington, DC a
.~,.
Dr. Carl J. Paperiello October 19,1998 GDP'98-02l'9, Page 2 to this letter provides a detailed description of the proposed changes. Revised SARUP pages are provided in Enclosure 3.
Revisions are noted by a revision bar in the left-hand page margin. The conclusions stated in Enclosure 2 to Reference 1, that the proposed changes associated with the CAR are significant, are not affected by this revision and thus no significance determination is provided.
Any questions regarding this matter should be directed to Steve Routh at (301) 564-3251. There are no new commitments contained in this submittal.
Sincerely, A
S. A.
I '
Steven A. Toelle Nuclear Regulatory Assurance and Policy Manager
References:
- 1. Letter from James H. Miller (USEC) to Dr. Carl J. Paperiello (NRC), Certificate Amendment Request - Update the Application Safety Analysis Report, USEC Letter GDP 97-0189, October 31,1997.
l
- 2. Letter from George P. Rifakes (USEC) to Dr. Carl J. Paperiello (NRC),Cenificate Amendment Request - Update the Application Safety Analysis Report - Proposed Changes, USEC Letter GDP 98-0064, March 31,1998.
Enclosures:
- 1. Aflidavit
- 2. United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), Proposed Changes, Certificate Amendment Request, Update the Application Safety Analysis Report, Detailed Description of Change
- 3. Proposed Changes, Certificate Amendment Request, Safety Analysis Report Update, Insertion / Removal Instructions, October 19,1998 cc: Mr. Robert C. Pierson, NRC NRC Region III Oflice NRC Resident Inspector - PORTS NRC. Resident Inspector - PGDP Mr. Randall M. DeVault, DOE
OATil AND AFFIRMATION 1, Steven A. Toelle, swear and aflirm that I am the Nuclear Regulatory Assurance and Policy Manager of the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC), that I am authorized by USEC to 4
sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission these proposed changes to the Safety Analysis Report Update, for the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant, as described in GDP 98-0219, that I am familiar with the contents thereof, and that the statements made and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.
A re A---.
Steven A. Toelle On this 19th day of October 1998, the individual signing above personally appeared before me, is known by me to be the person whose name is subscribed to within the instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same for the purposes therein contained.
In witness hereofI hereunto set my hand and oflicial seal.
M 4.L Lj urie M. Knisley, Notary Public State of Maryland, Montgomery County My commission expires March 1,2002
GDP 98-0219 Page1 of2 United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC)
Proposed Changes Certificate Amendment Request Update the Application Safety Analysis Report Detailed Description of Change 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this submittal is to provide revised pages to the Safety Analysis Report Update (SARUP) previously transmitted in USEC letters GDP 97-0188, dated October 31,1997 (Reference 1), and GDP 98-0064, dated March 31,1998 (Reference 2), for NRC review and approval.
l 2.0 Description of Submittal The following changes are included in this submittal which modify the latest version of the SAR Update certificate amendment request. The revised pages are included in Enclosure 3.
A.
The Revision Log has been updated to reflect the changes included in this revision.
B.
The List of EfTective Pages has been updated to reflect the changes included in this revision.
C.
SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A, Section 1.11 has been revised to include the four process building cranes (one each in buildings C-310, C-315, C-333 amd C-337) that are normally parked over cascade equipment in the commitment to sections of ANSI B30.2, Overhead and Gantry Crane Design and Inspection,1990 Edition (including Addendum A,1991). As discussed in the October 31,1997 SARUP submittal, these four process building cranes are classified in the SARUP as AQ SSCs. Consistent with this change in quality classification was a commitment to identify industry codes and standards that would apply to these cranes. This revision fulfills that commitment.
D.
SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A, Section 1.14 has been revised to correct the year of record for ANSI B30.20 from 1992 to 1993.
i E.
SARUP Sections 3.15.6.2.2 and 3.15.6.2.3 have been revised to clarify the reference to codes and standards for liquid UF cylinder handling cranes. The sections referenced in Chapter 1, 6
Appendix A, are inspection and testing requirements and not design requirements. There are no changes to the commitments to sections of crane codes and standards contained in SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A.
F.
SARUP Section 3.15.9.2.2 has been revised to clarify that the industry codes and standards applicable to the process building cranes only involve inspection and testing requirements and 4
GDP 98-0219 i
Page 2 of 2 not design requirements. SARUP Section 3.15.9.2.3 has been revised to reference SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A.
G.
The Basis statements for SARUP Technical Safety Requirement (TSR) Sections 2.2.4.1, 2.3.4.2, 2.5.4.2, and 2.6.4.2 have been revised to remove one of two references to SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A, for liquid UF cylinder handling cranes. The sections of the codes and standards 6
referenced in Chapter 1, Appendix A, are inspection and testing requirements and not design requirements. The discussion preceding the deleted reference involved design guidance. There are no changes to the commitments to sections ofcrane codes and standards in S ARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A.
References i
1.
Letter from James H. Miller (USEC) to Dr. Carl J. Paperiello (NRC), Certificate Amendment Request - Update the Application Safety Analysis Report, USEC Letter GDP 97-0189, October 31,1997.
2.
Letter from George P. Rifakes (USEC) to Dr. Carl J. Paperiello (NRC), Certificate Amendment Request - Update the Application Safety Analysis Report - Proposed Changes, USEC Letter GDP 98-0064, March 31,1998.
l
(3 PROPOSED CHANGES CERTIFICATE ABIENDMENT REQUEST SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT UPDATE INSERTION / REB 10 VAL INSTRUCTIONS OCTOBER 19,1998 Remove Pages Insert Pages SARUP Revision Log SARUP Revision Log 1
i SARUP List of Effective Pages SARUP List of Effective Pages SARUP-1, SARUP-2, SARUP-3, SARUP-4, SARUP-1, SARUP-2, SARUP-3, SARUP-4, SARUP-ll, SARUP-12 SARUP-II, SARUP-12 SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A I SARUP Chapter 1, Appendix A A-3, A-4 A-3, A-4 SARUP Section 3.15 SARUP Section 3.15 3.15-50, 3.15-51, 3.15-67 3.15-50, 3.15-51, 3.15-67 p)
SARUP Technical Safety Requirements SARUP Technical Safety Requirements t
2.2.I8, 2.3-23, 2.5-16, 2.6-21 2.2-18, 2.3-23, 2.5-16, 2.6-21
/
(v)
l October 19, 1998 t
United States Enriclunent Corporation Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Safety Analysis Report Update REVISION LOG Date Description 8/18/97 Initial Issue. Included: changes to SAR Chapter 2 (changed pages only); new SARUP Sections 4.1,4.2.1 through 4.2.5, 4.3.1, 4.4.
10/31/97 Submittal of completely SARUP (including 8/18/97 sections unchanged),
with the exception of changes to Application SAR Chapter 3. Included:
changes to SAR Chapters 1 and 2 and Sections 5.2,5.4, and 5.6 (changed pages only); complete replacement of Section 3.15, Chapter 4, and the TSRs; new Section 5.2, Appendix A.
3/31/98 Submittal to remove the fixed fire suppression sprinkler systems within the C-333-A, C-337-A, and C-360 facilities and the sanitary and fire water system (SFWS), including it's distribution and elevated storage tank as safety (AQ) systems. Sections revised include: Section 3.15.7.2, Table 3.15-2, Table 4.2-5, Table 4.2-11, Section 4.3.2.2.16, TSR Table of Contents, TSR 2.2.3.3, TSR 2.4.3.1.a, TSR 2.4.3.1.b, TSR 2.4.3.2.a, TSR 2.4.3.2.b, and TSR 2.6.3.2. SARUP List of Effective Pages added.
10/19/98 Submittal to define the codes and standards applied to the process building cranes.
Sections revised include:
Chapter 1,
Appendix A,
Sections 3.15.6.2.2, 3.15.6.2.3, 3.15.9.2.2, 3.15.9.2.3 and TSRs 2.2.4.1, 2.3.4.2, 2.5.4.2, and 2.6.4.2.
O i
1 I
- - - -. - _ _. _ - -.. _~
i SARUP PGDP October 19, 1998
/]
SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES SAROP Pa'ne RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Page RAC/Date/ Revision Revision Loe 2.1-1 97C100 2.1 3 97C100 i
October 19,1998 2.1-4 97C100 2.1-5 97C100 SARUP Ust of Effective Paces 2.1-20 97C100 SARUP-1 October 19,1998 2.2 1 97C100 SARUP-2 October 19, 1998 2.2-2 97C100 SARUP-3 October 19,1998 SARUP-4 October 19,1998 2.3-1 97C100
~
SARUP-5 March 31,1998 2.3-2 97C100 i
SARUP-6 March 31,1998 2.3-3 97C100 SARUP-7 March 31,1998 2.3-4 97C100 l
SARUP-8 March 31,1998 2.3-5 97C100 SARUP-9 March 31,1998 2.3-6 97C100 SARUP-10 March 31,1998 2.3-7 97C100 a
SARUP-il October 19,1998 2.3 8 97C100 SARUP-12 October 19,1998 2.3-9 97C100 2.3-10 97C100 g
2.3-10a 97C100
(
Chapter 1. Ann. A 2.3-10b 97C100 2.3-11 97C100 A-1 97C0238(RI) 2.3-Ila 97C100 A-2 97C0238(R1) 2.3-11b 97C100 A-3 97C238 (RO) 2.3 12 97C100 98C116 (RO) 2.3-13 97C100 A-4 97C238 (RO) 2.3-14 97C100 98C116 (RO)
A-5 97C0238(RO) -
2.4 1 97C100 A-6 97C0238(R0) 2.4-la 97C100 A-7 Rev. 8 2.4-2 97C100 A-8 97C0238(RO) 2.4-3 97C100 A-9 Rev. 8 2.4-4 97C100 A-10 Rev.8 2.4-5 97C100 2.4 6 97C100 Chapter 2 2.4-6a 97C100 i
2,4-7 97C100 3
97C100 4
97C100 5
97C100 2.5-1 97C100 6
97C100 2.5-2 97C100 6a 97C100 2.5-3 97C100 2.5-6 97C100 o
SARUP-1
i SARUP-PGDP October 19, 1998
('N SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES SARUP Paic RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Paec RAC/Date/ Revision e.f-l 97C100 2.7-8 97C100 a.u-la 97C100 2.6-2 97C100 2.8-1 97C100 2.6-2a 97C100 2.8-2 97C100 2.6-3 97C100 2.8-3 97C100 2.6-3a 97C100 2.6-4 97C100 2.9-1' 97C100 2.6-5 97C100 2.9-2 97C100 2.6-6 97C100 2.9-3 97C100 2.6-6a 97C100 2.9-4 97C100 2.6-6b 97C100 2.9-5 97C100 2.6-7 97C100 2.9-6 97C100 2.6-8 97C100 2.9-7 97C100 2.6-9 97C100 2.9-8 97C100 2.6-10 97C100 2.9-9 97C100
- 2.6-10a 97C100 2.9-10 97C100 2.6-10b 97C100 2.9-11 97C100 2.6-10c 97C100 2.9-12 97C100 2.6-10d 97C100 2.9-13 97C100 2.6-10e 97C100 2.9-14 97C100 2.6-10f 97C100 2.9-15 97C100 2.6-10g 97C100 2.6-10h 97C100 2.6-10i 97C100 2.6-10J 97C100 2.6-11b 97C100 2.6-13 97C100 2.6-14 97C100 2.6-15 97C100 2.6-16 97C100
'2.6-17 97C100 2.6-18 97C100 2.6-19 97C100 2.6-20 97C100 2.6-21 97C100 2.6-22 97C100 2.7-1 97C100 1
2.7-2 97C100 i
2.7-3 97C100 2.7-4 97C100 2.7-5 97C100 2.7-6
.97C100 p
2.7-7 97C100 SARUP-2
m.
SARUP-PGDP October 19, 1998
[]
SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES SARUP Pane RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Pace RAC/Date/ Revision Clianter 3 3.15-39 97C238(RI) 3.15-40 97C238(R1) i 97C238(R1) 3.15-41.
97C238(R1) ii 97C238(R1) 3.15-42 97C238(R1) lii 97C238(R1) 3.15-43 97C238(RI) 3.15-44 97C238(R1) 3.15-1 97C238(R1) 3.15-45 97C238(RI) 3.15-2 97C238(R1) 3.15-46 97C238(R1) 3.15-3 97C238(R1) 3.15-47 97C238(R1) 3.15-4 97C238(R1) 3.15-48 97C238(R1) 3.15-5 97C238(R1) 3.15-49 97C238(RI) 3.15-6 97C238(R1) 3.15-50 97C238(RI) 3.15-7 97C238(RI) 98C116 (RO) 3.15-8 97C238(RI) 3.15-51 97C238(RI) 3.15-9 97C238(RI) 98C116 (RO) 3.15-10 97C238(RI) 3.15-52 97C238(RI) 3.15-11 97C238(R1) 3.15-53 97C238(R1) 3.15-12 97C238(RI) 3.15-54 97C238(RI) 3.15-13 97C238(RI) 3.15-55 97C238(RI) 3.15-14 97C238(RI) 3.15-56 97C238(R2)
I 3.15-15 97C238(RI) 3.15-57 97C238(R2)
,U 3.15-16 97C238(R1) 3.15-58 97C238(RI) 3.15-17 97C238(RI) 3.15-59 97C238(RI) 3.15-18 97C238(RI) 3.15-60 97C238(RI) 3.15-19 97C238(RI) 3.15-61 97C238(RI) 3.15-20 97C238(RI) 3.15-62 97C238(RI) 3.15-21 97C238(RI) 3.15-63 97C238(RI) 3.15-22 97C238(RI) 3.15-64 97C238(RI) 3.15-23 97C238(RI) 3.15-65 97C238(RI) 3.15-24 97C238(R1) 3.15-66 97C238(RI) 3.15-25 97C238(RI) 3,15-67 97C238 (R1) 3.15-26 97C238(RI) 98C116 (RO) 3.15-27 97C238(RI) 3.15-68 97C238(RI) 3.15-28 97C238(RI) 3.15-69 97C238(RI) 3.15-29 97C238(RI) 3.15-70 97C238(RI) 3.15-30 97C238(RI) 3.15-71 97C238(RI)
-3.15 31 97C238(RI) 3.15-72 97C238(RI) 3.15-32 97C238(R1) 3.15-73 97C238(RI) 3.15 33 97C238(R1) 3.15-74 97C238(R1) 3.15 97C238(RI) 3.15-75 97C238(RI) 3.15-35 97C238(RI) 3.15-76 97C238(RI) 3.15-36 97C238(RI) 3.15-77 97C238(RI) 3.15-37 97C238(RI) 3.15-78 97C238(RI)
(
3.15-38 97C238(RI) 3.15-79 97C238(RI)
SARUP-3
~. _
SARUP-PGDP October 19,1998 SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES SAltUP Pace RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Pace RAC/Date/Revis'on 1
3.15-80 97C238(RI)
T3.15-6 97C238(RI) i 3.15-81 97C238(RI)
T3.15-7 97C238(RI) 3.15-82 97C238(RI)
T3.15-8 97C238(RI)
-3.15-83.
97C238(RI)
T3.15-9 97C238(RI) 3.15-84 97C238(RI)
T3.15-10 97C238(RI) i 3.15-85 97C238(RI)
T3.15-I l 97C238(RI)
}
3.15-86 97C238(RI)
T3.15-1, Sht. I 97C238(RI)
T3.15-1, Sht. 2 97C238(RI)
.T3.15-1, Sht. 3 97C238(RI) i T3.15-1, Sht. 4 97C238(RI)
T3.15-1, Sht. 5
' 97C238(R1)-
T3.15-1, Sht. 6 97C238(RI)
T3.15-1, Sht. 7 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht.1 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. 2 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht. 3 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. 4 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. 5 97C238(RI) p}-
T3.15-2, Sht. 6 97C238(RI)
(
4 1
T3.15-2, Sht. 7 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht. 8 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. 9 97C238(RI)
I T3.15-2, Sht.10 97C238(RI) i T3.15-2, Sht. I1 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht.12 97C238(RI) 1 T3.15-2, Sht.13 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. _14 97C238(RI)
A T3.15-2, Sht.15 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht.16 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2. Sht.17 97C238(R2)
T3.15-2, Sht.18 97C238(R2)
T3.15-2, Sht.19 97C238(R2) j T3.15-2, Sht. 20 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht. 21 97C238(RI) i T3.15-2, Sht. 22 97C238(RI)
T3.15-2, Sht. 23 97C238(R1)
T3.15-2, Sht. 24 97C238(R1)
T3.15-3, Sht.1 97C238(RI)
T3.15-3, Sht. 2 97C238(RI)
~
T3.15-3, Sht. 3 97C238(RI)
T3.15 97C238(RI)
T3.15-5 97C238(RI) l
\\
l SARUP-4 i
..x,.
SARUP-PGDP October 19,1998 SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES sal (UP Pace RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Page RAC/Date/ Revision Tecimical Safety Requirements 2.1-28 97C237(R2)
Cover Page 97C237(R2) 2.2-1 97C237(R2) 2.2-2 97C237(R2) ii 97C237(R3) 2.2-3 97C237(R2) lii 97C237(R2) 2.2-4 97C237(R2) iv 97C237(R3) 2.2-5 97C237(R2) v 97C237(R2) 2.2-6 97C237(R2) 2.2-7 97C237(R2) 1.0-1 97C237(R2) 2.2-8 97C237(R3) 1.0-2 97C237(R2) 2.2-9 97C237(R2) 1.0-3 97C237(R2) 2.2-10 97C237(R2) 1.0-4 97C237(R2) 2.2-11 97C237(R2) 1.0-5 97C237(R2) 2.2-12 97C237(R2) 1.0-6 97C237(R2) 2.2-13 97C237(R2) 1.0-7 97C237(R2) 2.2-14 97C237(R2) 2.2-15 97C237(R2) 2.1-1 97C237(R2) 2.2-16 97C237(R2) 2.1-2 97C237(R2) 2.2-17 97C237(R2) n 2.1-3 97C237(R2) 2.2-18 97C237(R2)
(]
2.1-4 97C237(R2) 98C116 (RO) 2.1-5 97C237(R2) 2.1-6 97C237(R2) 2.3-1 97C237(R2) 2.1-7 97C237(R2) 2.3-2 97C237(R2) 2.1-8 97C237(R2) -
2.3-3 97C237(R2) 2.1-9 97C237(R2) 2.3-4 97C237(R2) 2.1-10 97C237(R2) 2.3-5 97C237(R2) 2.1-11 97C237(R2) 2.3-6 97C237(R2) 2.1-12 97C237(R2) 2.3-7 97C237(R2) 2.1-13 97C237(R2) 2.3-8 97C237(R2) 2.1-14 97C237(R2) 2.3-9 97C237(R2) 2.1-15 97C237(R2) 2.3-10 97C237(R2) 2.1-16 97C237(R2) 2.3-11 97C237(R2) 2.1-17 97C237(R2) 2.3-12 97C237(R2) 2.1-18 97C237(R2) 2.3-13 97C237(R2) 2.1-19 97C237(R2) 2.3-14 97C237(R2) 2.1-20 97C237(R2) 2.3-15 97C237(R2) 2.1-21 97C237(R2) 2.3-16 97C237(R2) 2.1-22 97C237(R2) 2.3-17 97C237(R2) 2.1-23 97C237(R2) 2.3-18 97C237(R2) 2.1-24 97C237(R2) 2.3-19 97C237(R2) 2.1-25 97C237(R2) 2.3-20 97C237(R2) 2.1-26 97C237(R2) 2.3-21 97C237(R2) 2.1-27 97C237(R2) 2.3-22 97C237(R2)
SARUP-ll
SARUP-PGDP October 19, 1998 SARUP LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES G
SAkUP Pace RAC/Date/ Revision SARUP Pace RAC/Date/ Revision 2.3-23 97C237(R2) 2.6-1 97C237(R2) 98Cl16 (RO) 2.6-2 97C237(R2) 2.3-24 97C237(R2) 2.6-3 97C237(R2) 2.3-25 97C237(R2) 2.6-4 97C237(R2) 2.3-26 97C237(R2) 2.6-5 97C237(R2) 2.6-6 97C237(R3) 2.4-1 97C237(R2) 2.6-7 97C237(R2) 2.4-2 97C237(R2) 2.6-8 97C237(R2)'
2.4-3 97C237(R3) 2.6-9 97C237(R2) 2.4-4 97C237(R3) 2.6-10 97C237(R2) 2.4-5 97C237(R3) 2.6-11 97C237(R2) 2.4-6 97C237(R3) 2.6-12 97C237(R2) 2.4-7 97C237(R3) 2.6-13 97C237(R2) 2.4-8 97C237(R3) 2.6-14 97C237(R2) 2.4-9 97C237(R2).
2.6-15 97C237(R2) 2.4-10 97C237(R2) 2.6-16 97C237(R2) 2.4-11_
97C237(R2) 2.6-17 97C237(R2) 2.4-12 97C237(R2) 2.6-18 97C237(R2) 2.4-13
- 97C237(R2) 2.6-19 97C237(R2) 2.4-14 97C237(R2) 2.6-20 97C237(R2) 2.4-15 97C237(R2) 2.6-21 97C237(R2) 2.4-16 97C237(R2) 98C116 (RO) 2.4-17 97C237(R2) 2.6-22 97C237(R2) 2.6-23 97C237(R2) 2.5-1 97C237(R2) 2.6-24 97C237(R2) 2.5-2 97C237(R2) 2.5-3 97C237(R2) 3.0-1 97C237(R2) 2.5-4 97C237(R2) 3.0-2 97C237(R2) 2.5-5 97C237(R2) 3.0-3 97C237(R2) 2.5-6 97C237(R2) 3.0-4 97C237(R2) 2.5-7 97C237(R2) 3.0-5 97C237(R2)
~;
-2.5-8 97C237(R2) 3.0-6 97C237(R2) 2.5-9_
97C237(R2) 3.0-7 97C237(R2) i 2.5 97C237(R2) 3.0-8 97C237(R2) 2.5-11 97C237(R2) 3.0-9 97C237(R2) 2.5-12 97C237(R2) 3.0-10 97C237(R2) 2.5-13 97C237(R2) 3.0-11 97C237(R2) 2.5-14 97C237(R2)'
3.0-12 97C237(R2)
{
2.5-15 97C237(R2) 2.5-16 97C237(R2) 98C116 (RO) 2.5-17 97C237(R2) b s
SARUP-12
. _ ~ _
SAR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19, 1998
[
RAC 97C' 38 (RO), RAC 98C116 (RO) 2 A / -.
Section 5.1 - PGDP does not implement the unit mass limits described in this section. Mass l
limits are defined in Nuclear Criticality Safety Approvals (NCSAs) and Nuclear Criticality Safety Evaluations (NCSEs).
For references to this standard, see SAR Section 5.2.2.1.
1.8 ANSI /ANS 8.19, Administrative Practices for Nuclear Criticality Safety,1984 Edition PGDP satisfies the requirements of this standard.
For references to this standard, see SAR Section 5.2.2.1.
1.9 ANSI /ANS 8.20, American National Standard for Nuclear Criticality Safety Training,1991 Edition PGDP satisfies the requirements of this standard.
For references to this standard, see SAR Sections 6.6.5.2 and 6.6.6.1.
.l.10 ANSI A17.1, Safety Codes for Elevators,1974 Edition O
PGDP satisfies only the following section of this standard as clarified below:
Section 1005.4 - The building C-360 hydraulic lifts (elevator and levelator) are designed and tested to the requirements of this section of the standard for direct-plunger type elevators.
For references to this standard, see the TSR Sections 2.6.4.3 and 2.6.4.4.
1.11 ANSI B30.2, Overhead and Gantry Crane Design & Inspection,1990 Edition (including Addenda A,1991)
PGDP satisfies the requirements of the following sections of this standard for liquid UF. handling cranes, Feed Facility cranes, and process building cranes (one each in buildings C-310, C-315, C-333 and C-337) that are normally parked over cascade equipment:
Section 2-2.1.1 - all Section 2-2.1.2 - all Section 2-2.1.3 - all except for paragraphs (6), (8), and (9)
Section 2-2.2.2 - only paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(4)
Section 2-2.3.1 - all 1
Section 2-2.4.1 - all 1.12. ANSI B30.9, Slings,1990 Edition (including Addenda A,1991)
PGDP satisfies the requirements of the following sections of this standard for lifting fixtures used to handle liquid UF cylinders:
6 A-3
~
.. - -. ~ -...
l l
)
I i
- . L/
SAR PGDP.
PROPOSED Octobec 19, 1998 RAC 97C238 (RO). RAC 98C116 (RO) t-Section 9-1.6 - all
)
Section 9-2.8.1 - all p
Section 9-2.8.2 - at
.1.13
. ANSI B30.10, Hooks,1987 Edition (up through Addeuda C,1992) ~
PGDP ntisfies the requirements of the following shetions of this standard for lifting fixtures used j
i-to handle liquid UF. cylinders:
i Section 10-1.2.1.1 - all i
Section 10-1.2.1.2 - all -
(
Section 10-1.2.1.3 - all l
ll 1.14 ANSI B30.20, Below the Hook Rigging Devices,1993 Edition I
PGDP satisfies the requin:ments of the following sections of this standard fer lifting fixtures used to handle liquid UF cylinders:
{
6
- Section 20-1. 3 - all l
Section 20 l.4.1 - ordy paragraphs (a) and (b) i 1
'g 1 15 ANSI NB-23, National Board Inspection Code,1995 Edition PGDP satisfies the requirements of this code as described below:
UF accumulators and condensers are inspected at 5 year intervals in accordance with the 1995 edition of the National Board Inspection Code (NBIC).
1.16 ~ ANSI N323, Radiation Protection Instrumentation Test and Calibration,1978 Edition PGDP satisfies the requirements of this ' standard except as described in SAR Section 5.3,5.
1.17 ANSI N510, Testing of Nr. clear Air Treatmen.t Systems,1989 Edition PGDP satisfies the requirements of this standard for the priodic testirg of HEPA systents that c
i are relied upon for personnel protection or to meet environmental emissions limits with the l
following exceptions:
Section 11-The test gas specified will be an alternative but ecuivalent Halide gas, l
l L
Section 15 - Laboratory testing of the : adsorbent will test for HF loading instexd cf radiciodine since HF is the gas of concem at PGDP.
For references to this standard, see SAR Sections 5.3.2.10 and 5.3.7.5.
V i -
A-4 l
_ _ ~ _. _ _ _ _
q
- i!'
i i
t SAR-PGDP PROIOSED October 19, 1998 j' /"'i RAC 97Cd8 (RI), RAC 98Cll6 (RO) h 5.
.. Cylinders that are not approved (i.e., sized) for holding greater tha'i 500 lb (227 kg) of UF. do
[
i
[
cot have the capacity to contain sufficient inaterial to result in signiil: ant off-site health effects.
Cylinders capable of holding greater than 50)lb (227 kg) of UF, but not approved for filling may j
contain only solid UF. unless they tre being heated in a closed autoclave.
Cylinders containing ordy glscous/setid UF., regardless of size, have the potential to exceed only the on-site EGs if the cylinder does not maintain its integrity.
j Therefore, cylinders capable of holding nore than 500 lb (227 kg) of UF. are classified as Q.
l S'naller cylinders (capable of holdir:g r.o more than 500 lb [227 kg] of UF.) are classified as AQ.
i
[.
"J.15.6.1.5 Bpundary l
The Q and AQ boundaries for the UF cylinders are defined in Tables 3.15-1 and 3.15-2, respectively.
[
3.15.6.2 Liquid UF Cjlinder Handling Crar,es k
The liquid UF cylinder handling cranes consist of those cranes and associated lifting fixtures in the feed, withdrawal, and the toll transfer and sampling facilities that are used to lift liquid-filled UF.
i cylinders. Facility-specific differences are noted where appropriate,
(
3.15.6.2.1 EafetyJunctiou j
j' The liquid UF. cylinder handling crancs shall not fail in a manner to cause US primary system failure. The liquid UF. cylinder handling crancs provide for the safe movement of liquid US cylinders.
. This function is accomplished by ensuring liquij UF handling crane lifting components and load braking j
systems are maintained to prevent an uncornrolled dropping of a cylinder. Both engineering and
(
adrainistrative controls are used to limit the areas (i.e., none controls) that liquid UF. handling cranes can be operated. These zone controls are usel to minEmize the risk associated with dropping a liquid cylinder, o': similar weight load, on operating process equipment.
3.15.6.2.2 Functionallkauitruents The liquid UF,, cylinder handling cranes shall be designed in accordance with the following functiorn! requirements to emure the capaSility to accomplish the required stfety function:
The cras shall be designed to withstand the evaBuation basis earthqualte and not fail in a manner such that the load wi.ll be dropped.
The cranes shall be designed to withstand the evaluation basis wind loading and not fail in a manner such that the load will be dropped.
l The cranes shall be designed for the loads they will handle during operation of these facilities.
The cranes shall be designed so that the load will not be dropped should the controls be released fer any reason (e.g., evacuation of facility).
t 49 3.15-50
- .----i
SAR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19, 1998
(^
RAC 97C238 (RI), RAC 98Cl16 (RO) l
\\*
3.1'5.6.2.3' System Evaluation The required safety function is to not fail in a manner that causes UF primary system failure 6
(i.e., dropped cylinder) during normal operation, an evacuation of facility event, or natural phenomena l events. The cranes are designed for the loads they will handle during normal operation of these facilities.
Administrative controls require inspections of the cables, brakes, and other critical items to ensure that j the crane can operate correctly. (Refer to Chapter 1, Appendix A for commitments to ANSI standard l inspection and testing requirements). In addition, the cranes are designed so that when the controls are released (e.g., evacuation of facility event), only small compensatory movements occur due to momentum after the crane drive mechanism stops and brakes are applied but these movements have no safety significance. The cranes were evaluated to assess their ability to withstand natural phenomena events.
The analyses indicated that the cranes will not have any structural damage, will remain in place, and will not release their loads during an evaluation basis eanhquake and wind. Floods do not reach the elevation of the facility to threaten crane integrity.
Failure of the crane lifting components or load braking system while lifting a liquid-filled UF6 cylinder could result in dropping the cylinder and rupturing the cylinder. Therefore, a load test is performed periodically.
Engineering (i.e, limit switches, etc.) and administrative controls are also used with liquid UF6 cylinder handling cranes to minimize the risk of the cranes dropping a liquid cylinder, or similar weight (A
load, on operating process equipment. The engineering controls for liquid handling cranes used in the i
various process buildings are discussed in Section 3.7.3.1.2. The administrative zone controls (such as V
for the feed facilities) are incorporated in the applicable procedures.
Based on the analysis, the cranes can accomplish the required safety function.
3.15.6.2.4 System Classification The liquid UF cylinder handling cranes are required to perform the following safety function:
6 Prevent dropping a liquid-filled UF cylinder that could result in a cylinder failure event.
The cylinder failure event is classified as an EBE whose consequences could exceed the off-site EGs if the cranes were to fail in a manner that resulted in the drop and failure of a liquid-filled cylinder.
Therefore, the liquid UF cylinder handling cranes meet the criteria for classification as a Q system.
6 3.15.6.2.5 Boundary The Q boundaries for the liquid UF cylinder handling cranes, including associated lifti,g 6
fixtures, are defined in Table 3.15-1.
O) i 3.15-51
SAR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19,1998 i
T RAC 97C238 (RI), RAC 98Cl16 (RO)
.V i
3.15.9.2.1 Safety Function i
The cell floor process building cranes shall not fai! in a manner that will cause a large UF release 6
during:
Normal operation, Natural phenomena events with the cranes in the parked position and An evacuation event due to a release of the controls.
3.15.9.2.2 Functional Reauirements The system shall meet the following functional requirements to ensure the capability to accomplish the required safety functions:
The process building cranes shall not fail from the parked position in a manner that will cause UF primary system failure during an evaluation basis natural phenomena event.
6 The process building cranes shall be designed to prevent dropping of the load should the controls be released for any reason (e.g., evacuation of the facility).
l The process building cranes shall be designed for the loads they will handle during operation of these facilities.
3.15.9.2.3 System Evaluation
.Ih The process building cranes are required to be designed so that evaluation basis natural phenomena events will not result in a large release of UF when the cranes are in the parked position.
6 This safety function is accomplished by requiring the cranes to withstand evaluation basis natural phenomena events to the extent necessary to prevent failure of the UF primary system. Additional 6
assurance is provided by ongoing inspections and tests (Refer to Chapter 1, Appendix A for commitments to ANSI standard inspection and testing requirements).
l l
The process building cranes are parked in a standby location when not in use. There are two cranes (one each in the C-333 and C-337 facilities) that are normally parked over unit bypass piping.
Analysis indicates these process building cranes will not fall from their parked positions during an evaluatien basis earthquake, and they are not affected by the evaluation basis flood or high wind events.
i The use of these building cranes for moving a heavy load is infrequent because it is only needed when a piece of major equipment has failed. They are also used for other infrequent tasks such as replacing lights. Thus, the moving of a heavy load with a crane or the use of a crane for other activities concurrent with an evaluation basis natural phenomena event is not considered a credible event.
In the C-310 product withdrawal facility, one process building crane is parked over the Normetex l
pump located on the North end of the building. An evaluation of this crane determined that it would not fail from its parked position during an evaluation basis earthquake. In the C-315 tails withdrawal facility, i
one process building crane is parked near (but not directly over) the Normetex pump on the south-east i
side of the building. Akhough the C-315 process building crane was not seismically evaluated, this crane is equipped with drop plates that will minimize the risk of it falling during an evaluation basis earthquake.
3.15-67
TSR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19, 1998 RAC 97C237 (R2), 98Cil6 (RO) i 2.2.4 DESIGN FEATURES
-p
!' k 2.2.4.1 Liquid UF Cylinder IIandling Cranes DF:
The liquid handling cranes (and associated lifting fixtures) are designed and maintained not to fail in a manner to cause primary system integrity failure.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:
1 l
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 2.2.4.2-1 Perform operator functional crane inspection of: associated Prior to first time use lifting fixtures, hoist, trolley, bridge, and upper limit during shift switch.
SR 2.2.4.2-2 Perform a load test (at h 100% of rated capacity) of the Annually I
cranes and verify that the cranes do not allow a load to move (except compensatory movements) upon operator l
release of the controls.
SR 2.2.4.2-2 Perform load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) oflifting Annually fixtures.
BASIS:
i Cranes that transport cylinders containing liquid UF or solid cylinders over liquid UF. CYLINDERS are
(
designed with a minimum lifting capacity of 18 tons. The associated lifting fixture is designed with a j
U safety factor of 5:1. The 5:1 safety factor indica:es that the load-bearing members of the lifting device shall be capable of lifting five times the combined weight of the fixture's rated load and the weight of the fixture without exceeding the ultimate tensile strength of the construction materials. The itse of 5:1 safety factor has been shown to provide a lifting fixture which meets the design factor guidance presented l in applicable industry standards.
The cranes are required to prevent dropping a liquid 'illed UF. CYLINDER or a solid cylinder onto a liquid UF CYLINDER that could result in a cylinder failure event and a large release of Uf. This event is classified as an Evaluation Basis Event whose consequences could exceed off-site Evaluation Guidelines. The function performed by the crane is passive. In addition to the surveillances specified above, cranes handling liquid UF. are tested in accordance with sections of applicable industry standards as described in the SAR, Chapter 1, Appendix A.
Compensatory movements are small additional movements due to momentum after the crane drive mechanism stops and brakes are applied. These compensatory movements have no safety significance. [SAR Section 3.15.6.2]
l l
l l
- N I
2.2-18 l
TSR-PGOP PROPOSED October 19, 1998
~
RAC 97C237(R2),98C116 (RO) 2.3.4.2 Liquid UF. Cylinder IIandling Cranes
)
DF; The liquid handling cranes (and associated lifting fixtures) are designed and maintained not to fail in a manner to cause primary system integrity failure.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 2.3.4.21 Perform operator functional crane inspection of: associated Prior to first time use lifting fixtures, hoist, trolley, bridge. and upper limit during shift switch.
SR 2.3.4.2-2 Perform a load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) of the Annually cranes and verify that the cranes do not allow a load to move (except compensatory movements) upon operator release of the controls.
SR 2.3.4.2-3 Perform load test (at 2 100% of rated capacity) of lifting Annually fixtures.
BASIS:
Cranes that transport cylinders containing liquid UF or solid cylinders over liquid UF6 CYLINDERS are designed with a minimum lifting capacity of 18 tons. The associated lifting fixture is designed with p) a safety factor of 5:1. The 5:1 safety factor indicates that the load-bearing members of the lifting device shall be capable of lifting five times the combined weight of the fixture's rated load and the weight of (V
the fixture without exceeding the ultimate tensile strength of the construction materials. The use of 5:1 safety factor has been shown to provide a lifting fixture which meets the design factor guidance presented l in applicable industry standards.
The cranes are required to prevent dropping a liquid-filled UF. CYLINDER or a solid cylinder onto a liquid UF. CYLINDER that could result in a cylinder failure event and a large release of Uf. This event is classified as an Evaluation Basis Event whose consequences could exceed Off-site Evaluation Guidelines. The function performed by the crane is passive. In addition to the surveillances specified above, cranes handling liquid UF, are tested in accordance with sections of applicable industry standards as described in the SAR, Chapter 1, Appendix A.
Compensatory movements are small additional movements due to momentum after the crane drive mechanism stops and brakes applied. These compensatory movements have no safety significance. [SAR Section 3.15.6.2]
\\
%J 2.3-23
TSR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19,1998 RAC 97C237 (R2), 98Cl16 (RO) 2.5.4.2 Liquid UF, Cylinder IIandling Cranes (j
DF; The liquid handling cranes (and associated lifdng fixtures) are designed and maintained not to fail in a manner to cause primary system mtegrity failure.
SURVEILLANCE:
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 2.5.4.2-1 Perform operator functional crane inspection of: associated Prior to first time use lifting fixtures, hoist, trolley, bridge, and upper limit during shift switch.
SR 2.5.4.2-2 Perform a load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) of the Annually cranes and verify that the cranes do not allow a load to move (except compensatory movements) upon operator release of the controls.
SR 2.5.4.2-3 Perform load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) oflifting Annually fixtures.
BASIS:
Cranes that transport cylinders containing liquid UF, or solid cylinders over liquid UF. CYLINDERS are designed with a minimum lifting capacity of 18 tons. The associated lifting fixture is designed with a safety factor of 5:1. The 5:1 safety factor indicates that the load-bearing members of the lifting device p) shall be capable of lifting five times the combined weight of the fixture's rated load and the weight of (V
the fixture without exceeding the ultimate tensile strength of the constructiori materials. The use of 5:1 safety factor has been shown to provide a lifting fixture which meets the design factor guidance presented j in applicable industry standards.
The cranes are required to prevent dropping a liquid-filled UF. CYLINDER or a solid cylinder onto a liquid UF. CYLINDER that could result in a cylinder failure event and a large release of Uf. This event is classified as an Evaluation Basis Event whose consequences could exceed off-site Evaluation Guidelines. The function performed by the crane is passive. In addition to the surveillances specified above, cranes handling liquid UF, are tested in accordance with sections of applicable industry standards as destribed in the SAR, Chapter 1, Appendix A.
Compensatory movements are small additional movements due to momentum after the crane drive mechanism stops and brakes applied. These compensatory movements have no safety significance. [SAR Section 3.15.6.2]
p V)
I 2.5-16
1 ISR-PGDP PROPOSED October 19,1998 RAC 97C237 (R2), 98C116 (RO) 2.6.4.2 Liquid UF. Cylinder llandling Cranes i-)
iV DFs The liquid handling cranes (and associated lifting fixtures) are designed and maintained not to fail in a manner to cause primary system integrity failure.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS:
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 2.6.4.2-1 Perform operator functional crane inspection of: associated Prior to first time use lifting fixtures, hoist, trolley, bridge, and upper limit during shift switch.
SR 2.6.4.2-2 Perform a load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) of the Annually cranes and verify that the cranes do not allow a load to move (except compensatory movements) upon operator release of the controls.
SR 2.6.4.2-3 Perform load test (at 2100% of rated capacity) oflifting Annually fixtures.
i BASIS:
Cranes that transport cylinders containing liquid UF, or solid cylinders over liquid UF. CYLINDERS are designed with a minimum lifting capacity of 18 tons. The associated lifting fixture is designed with a
(~~'h safety factor of 5:1. The 5:1 safety factor indicates that the load-bearing members of the lifting device
\\
)
shall be capable of lifting five times the combined weight of the fixture's rated load and the weight of the fixture without exceeding the ultimate tensile strength of the construction materials. The use of 5:1 safety factor has been shown to provide a lifting fixture which meets the design factor guidance presented
{
l in applicable industry standards.
The cranes are required to prevent dropping a liquid-filled UF. CYLINDER or a solid cylinder onto a liquid UF CYLINDER that could result in a cylinder failure event and a large release of QF. This event is classified as an Evaluation Basis Event whose consequences could exceed off-site Evaluation Guidelines. The function performed by the crane is passive. In addition to the surveillances specified above, cranes handling liquid UF are tested in accordance with sections of applicable industry standards as described in the SAR, Chapter 1, Appendix A.
Compensatory movements are small additional movements due to momentum after the crane drive mechanism stops and brakes are applied. These compensatory movements have no safety significance. [SAR Section 3.15.6.2]
l G
2.6-21