ML20154P649

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 800410 Note Asking If NRC Asked to Comment on 2443 & HR 6865,bills Providing for DOE Solidification of Liquid Wastes in West Valley,Ny.Commission Not Received Formal Request to Comment on These Bills
ML20154P649
Person / Time
Site: West Valley Demonstration Project
Issue date: 05/05/1980
From: Bunting J
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20154P653 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-URFO NUDOCS 9810230037
Download: ML20154P649 (1)


Text

_

l

'Q' sk a.. ~ in no 4 h

v A

~

[>

. UNITED STATES J

f g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j

fa 1E E-WASHINGTON, D, C 20555

          • ,o j

1AY 5 1980 A

I

' MEMORANDUM'FOR':'I ohn B. Martin, Director.

J j

L

. Division of Waste Management i

l l[ '

FROM:

. Joseph 0. Bunting, Jr., Chief j

s Licensing Process and' Integration Branch i

i

SUBJECT:

- QUESTIONS ON WEST-VALLEY WASTE SOLIDIFICATION LEGISLATION -

l (S. 2443,. INTRODUCED BY' SENS.. M0YNIHAN AND JAVITS, ' AND H.R.

6865 INTRODUCED BY REP. LUNDINE) u Your note of April-10 asked if NRC had been asked to comment on the above

. Q'

. Bills providing for. DOE solidification of the liquid wastes as the Nrs

' Western New York Nuclear Service. Center in West Valle, NY. You also wanted to know if the Division of Waste Management (W ) had been properly l

. involved in the preparation of comments, and whether this Division is l

-coordinating with the Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety (FC).

i-i L

'Our understanding. is that the Commission has not received a fomal request to comment on these Bills, but they are virtually identical to the proposed L

. amendment introduced by Lundine last year to the FY 1980 DOE authorization

-j Bill. Mr. Dircks testified on this-amendment og -May 31', '1980 before the, House Interior Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, and a copy of his testimony is. enclosed. After the failure of the Lundine amendment, Mr. Dircks also asked:FC to analyze the Moynihan Bill, on February 27, 1980,

' three weeks. before-'itL was ' introduced as. a companion Bill to Lundine's H.R.

L' L

6865, 'a' resurrection of last year's amendment. A copy of Mr. Cunningham's L

response is. also enclosed, together with a copy of Ed Regnier's memorandum lA to FC's Charles Haughney, who prepared the memo for Mr. Cunningham's

-Q:

signature.

j

..is not' evident in the memo to Mr. Dircks. You will note that both memoranda While FC did r_equest our input, the analysis of the Waste Licensing Branch i

l carry the same date, and the points in Ed Regnier's do not appear in Cunningham's.

~To: assure adequate coordination of our comments on S. 2443, however, I have

. been. in touch with both Ed Regnier and Charles Haughney, and have put them

- on' concurrence for our separately-ticketed analysis.

lh N$4< u eph 0. Bunting, Jr., bief L

J L

L censing Process and Integration Branch l'

L

Enclosures:

. As: stated I

9810230037 800505 l

PDR ADOCK 05000201 b

U PDR a

w

_ _;y g y r ;

_