ML20154J179

Forwards Insp Rept 50-395/88-16 on 880712-15.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Explains That Individual Contaminated W/ Hot Particle Dose Record Must Include Exposure Calculated Per NRC Staff Position

ML20154J179
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	09/09/1988
From:	Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Bradham O SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
Shared Package
ML20154J181	List: IR 05000395/1988016 ML20154J179
References
NUDOCS 8809220272
Download: ML20154J179 (2)

See also: IR 05000395/1988016

Text

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - -

,

,

• , e . ..

-

OfhCla/ ,

.

SEP Q 9 M t

!

1

Docket No. 50-395 ,

License No. NPF-12

<

l

1

l

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company  :

ATTN

Mr. O. S. Bradham, Vice President i

Nuclear Operations i

'

'i

P. O. Box 88

Jenkinsville, SC 29065  ;

1

.l

Gentlemen: j

'

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-395/88-16

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted by i

]

F. N. Wright on July 12-15, 1988. The inspection included a review of (

i activities anithorized for your Sumer facility. At the conclusion of the  ;

j inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff l

i identified in the enclosed inspection report.  :

c

j Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within I

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures  !

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

'

i

activities in progress. f

',

j Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or devihtions were  !

4

identified. l

i i

During the inspection, the inspectors reviewed the personnel exposure records i

i

for the individual contaminatvd with a hot particle described in Inspection  !

Report No. 50-395/86-22. The individual's exposure records did not include the i

i

calculated skin dose of 420 rems based on current regulatory guidance in hB5 l

l Handbook 59 and IE Notice 86-23. As reported in our letter to you dated

, December 3, 1987, the NRC recognizes that the calculated dose of 420 rems based [

i on the current NRC staff position is very conservative and that the individual's l

! dose record should contain a notation of the circumstances of this dose to put l

l the dose in proper perspective. However, it is the NRC position that the l

) individual's dose record must include the exposure calculated in accordance with j

the current NRC staff positien.  ;

i (

j in accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2. L

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure i

4 will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room, l

l I

!  !

l  !

j i

i  !

l

8809220272 SSO909 l

gDR AEOCK050gg5

i [

_ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _J

r ___ _ _ _

.

..

. .

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company 2

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

()flC}ittll SigNd E9

)[

J. Philip Stohr, Director

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report

cc w/ enc 1:

S. L. Skolds, General Manager

Nuclear Plant Operations

J. E. Knotts, Jr.

Bishop Cook, Purcell & Reynolds

W. A. Williams, Jr., Technical

Assistant, Nuclear Operations -

Santee Cooper

A. R. Koon, Jr. , Manager

Nuclear Licensing

R. E. Rainear, Executive Vice President,

South Carolina Public Service Authority

K. E. Beale, Manager

Nuclear Protection Services

State of South Carolina

bec w/ enc 1:

NRC Resident inspector

DRS Technical Assistant

J. J. Hayes, Project Manager, NRR

Occument Control Desk

RI RII R Q ', f

i

jf V* Q,f LE ' NFP.-l{SfB

FW i - osey C:ol # .T r-v * * ' " ) h * * U^^

8/g(g.t/S3 e,15 /S 3 S/)[ .ns HDance q , g g ,g "

18[,y/psa *'4{- I L 2 - w

9 / '/ /R 9/7/d weg