ML20154J179
| ML20154J179 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1988 |
| From: | Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Bradham O SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20154J181 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8809220272 | |
| Download: ML20154J179 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000395/1988016
Text
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - -
,
,
OfhCla/
- , e . ..
,
SEP Q 9 M
-
.
t
!
1
Docket No. 50-395
,
License No. NPF-12
l
<
1
l
South Carolina Electric and Gas Company
ATTN: Mr. O. S. Bradham, Vice President
i
Nuclear Operations
i
'
P. O. Box 88
'i
Jenkinsville, SC 29065
1
.l
Gentlemen:
j
'
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-395/88-16
This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) inspection conducted by
i
]
F. N. Wright on July 12-15, 1988.
The inspection included a review of
(
activities anithorized for your Sumer facility.
At the conclusion of the
i
j
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
l
i
identified in the enclosed inspection report.
c
j
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.
Within
I
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
!
i
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
'
',
activities in progress.
f
!
j
Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or devihtions were
4
identified.
l
i
i
During the inspection, the inspectors reviewed the personnel exposure records
i
for the individual contaminatvd with a hot particle described in Inspection
!
i
Report No. 50-395/86-22. The individual's exposure records did not include the
i
calculated skin dose of 420 rems based on current regulatory guidance in hB5
l
i
l
Handbook 59 and IE Notice 86-23.
As reported in our letter to you dated
December 3, 1987, the NRC recognizes that the calculated dose of 420 rems based
[
,
i
on the current NRC staff position is very conservative and that the individual's
l
!
dose record should contain a notation of the circumstances of this dose to put
l
l
the dose in proper perspective.
However, it is the NRC position that the
l
)
individual's dose record must include the exposure calculated in accordance with
j
the current NRC staff positien.
i
(
j
in accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2.
L
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure
i
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room,
l
4
l
I
!
!
l
!
j
i
i
!
l
8809220272 SSO909
l
gDR
AEOCK050gg5
i
[
.
-
.
J
r
___
_ _ _
..
.
.
.
South Carolina Electric and Gas Company 2
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
()flC}ittll SigNd E9
)[
J. Philip Stohr, Director
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report
cc w/ enc 1:
S. L. Skolds, General Manager
Nuclear Plant Operations
J. E. Knotts, Jr.
Bishop Cook, Purcell & Reynolds
W. A. Williams, Jr., Technical
Assistant, Nuclear Operations -
Santee Cooper
A. R. Koon, Jr. , Manager
Nuclear Licensing
R. E. Rainear, Executive Vice President,
South Carolina Public Service Authority
K. E. Beale, Manager
Nuclear Protection Services
State of South Carolina
bec w/ enc 1:
NRC Resident inspector
DRS Technical Assistant
J. J. Hayes, Project Manager, NRR
Occument Control Desk
RI
RII
R Q ',
jf
V*
Q,f
LE
NFP.-l{SfB
f
i
FW i
- osey
C:ol
'
8/g(g.t
.T r-v * * ' " ) h * *
U^^
/S3
e,15 /S 3
S/)[
18[,y/psa
.ns HDance
q , g g ,g
"
- '4{- I L 2 - w
9 / '/
/R
9/7/d
weg